1
|
Mayer KA, Omic H, Weseslindtner L, Doberer K, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Viard T, Tillgren A, Haindl S, Casas S, Eskandary F, Heinzel A, Kozakowski N, Kikić Ž, Böhmig GA, Eder M. Levels of donor-derived cell-free DNA and chemokines in BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14785. [PMID: 35894263 PMCID: PMC10078585 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) carries a risk of irreversible allograft injury. While detection of BK viremia and biopsy assessment are the current diagnostic gold standard, the diagnostic value of biomarkers reflecting tissue injury (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA]) or immune activation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand [CXCL]9 and CXCL10) remains poorly defined. METHODS For this retrospective study, 19 cases of BKPyVAN were selected from the Vienna transplant cohort (biopsies performed between 2012 and 2019). Eight patients with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), 17 with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 10 patients without polyomavirus nephropathy or rejection served as controls. Fractions of dd-cfDNA were quantified using next-generation sequencing and CXCL9 and CXCL10 were detected using multiplex immunoassays. RESULTS BKPyVAN was associated with a slight increase in dd-cfDNA (median; interquartile range: .38% [.27%-1.2%] vs. .21% [.12%-.34%] in non-rejecting control patients; p = .005). Levels were far lower than in ABMR (1.2% [.82%-2.5%]; p = .004]), but not different from TCMR (.54% [.26%-3.56%]; p = .52). Within the BKPyVAN cohort, we found no relationship between dd-cfDNA levels and the extent of tubulo-interstitial infiltrates, BKPyVAN class and BK viremia/viruria, respectively. In some contrast to dd-cfDNA, concentrations of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 exceeded those detected in ABMR, but similar increases were also found in TCMR. CONCLUSION BKPyVAN can induce moderate increases in dd-cfDNA and concomitant high urinary excretion of chemokines, but this pattern may be indistinguishable from that of TCMR. Our results argue against a significant value of these biomarkers to reliably distinguish BKPyVAN from rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Haris Omic
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thierry Viard
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Susanne Haindl
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Casas
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Farsad Eskandary
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Eder
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Z, Graf FE, Hirsch HH. Antivirals against human polyomaviruses: Leaving no stone unturned. Rev Med Virol 2021; 31:e2220. [PMID: 33729628 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) encompass more than 10 species infecting 30%-90% of the human population without significant illness. Proven HPyV diseases with documented histopathology affect primarily immunocompromised hosts with manifestations in brain, skin and renourinary tract such as polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN), polyomavirus-associated haemorrhagic cystitis (PyVHC), polyomavirus-associated urothelial cancer (PyVUC), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), Trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS) and pruritic hyperproliferative keratinopathy. Although virus-specific immune control is the eventual goal of therapy and lasting cure, antiviral treatments are urgently needed in order to reduce or prevent HPyV diseases and thereby bridging the time needed to establish virus-specific immunity. However, the small dsDNA genome of only 5 kb of the non-enveloped HPyVs only encodes 5-7 viral proteins. Thus, HPyV replication relies heavily on host cell factors, thereby limiting both, number and type of specific virus-encoded antiviral targets. Lack of cost-effective high-throughput screening systems and relevant small animal models complicates the preclinical development. Current clinical studies are limited by small case numbers, poorly efficacious compounds and absence of proper randomized trial design. Here, we review preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated small molecules with presumed antiviral activity against HPyVs and provide an outlook regarding potential new antiviral strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongsong Wu
- Transplantation & Clinical Virology, Department Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabrice E Graf
- Transplantation & Clinical Virology, Department Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hans H Hirsch
- Transplantation & Clinical Virology, Department Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinical Virology, Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Infectious Diseases & Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taraz Jamshidi S, Sajjadian K, Emadzadeh M, Saber Afsharian M, Kalantari MR, Alenabi A, Zeraati AA, Emadzadeh A. Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy: Frequency and Graft Survival Analysis in Northeast of Iran. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2021; 16:215-221. [PMID: 33936233 PMCID: PMC8085291 DOI: 10.30699/ijp.2021.128489.2403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background & Objective: Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN), mainly caused by the BK virus, is one of the most important infectious complications of kidney transplantation. The leading histopathologic characteristics of PVAN is viral cytopathic effects, such as nucleomegaly with smudged or clumped chromatin and intranuclear ground-glass inclusion, mostly in tubular epithelial cells. Moreover, tubular necrosis, tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, atrophy, and fibrosis have been noted. Positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for SV-40 highlights the infected epithelial cells of renal tubules. Methods: A total of 85 core needle biopsies of transplanted kidneys were evaluated histologically and were stained for SV-40 using the IHC method. In addition, a follow-up of graft failure was performed. Results: Our findings revealed that the frequency of polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant patients in the Northeast of Iran is 4.7%. There was no significant correlation between PVAN and graft rejection. Although a higher rate of graft loss was observed in PVAN patients, in comparison with non-PVAN patients (25% vs. 14.8%), the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, patients with immunohistochemically confirmed PVAN and those with histopathologic features of viral-like cytopathic effects had significantly lower graft survival in the follow-up period (42.5 vs. 196.8 months and 109.4 vs. 205.7 months, respectively). Conclusion: The frequency of polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant patients in the Northeast of Iran is 4.7%. There was no significant correlation between PVAN and graft rejection. Furthermore, we observed that polyomavirus infection accelerates the course of graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirin Taraz Jamshidi
- Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad. Iran
| | - Khadijeh Sajjadian
- Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Maryam Emadzadeh
- Clinical Research Unit, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | | | - Mahmoud Reza Kalantari
- Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad. Iran
| | - Anita Alenabi
- Cancer Molecular Pathology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Abbas Ali Zeraati
- Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad. Iran
| | - Ali Emadzadeh
- Kidney Transplantation Complications Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad. Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nickeleit V, Singh HK, Randhawa P, Drachenberg CB, Bhatnagar R, Bracamonte E, Chang A, Chon WJ, Dadhania D, Davis VG, Hopfer H, Mihatsch MJ, Papadimitriou JC, Schaub S, Stokes MB, Tungekar MF, Seshan SV. The Banff Working Group Classification of Definitive Polyomavirus Nephropathy: Morphologic Definitions and Clinical Correlations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 29:680-693. [PMID: 29279304 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2017050477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is a common viral infection of renal allografts, with biopsy-proven incidence of approximately 5%. A generally accepted morphologic classification of definitive PVN that groups histologic changes, reflects clinical presentation, and facilitates comparative outcome analyses is lacking. Here, we report a morphologic classification scheme for definitive PVN from the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy, comprising nine transplant centers in the United States and Europe. This study represents the largest systematic analysis of definitive PVN undertaken thus far. In a retrospective fashion, clinical data were collected from 192 patients and correlated with morphologic findings from index biopsies at the time of initial PVN diagnosis. Histologic features were centrally scored according to Banff guidelines, including additional semiquantitative histologic assessment of intrarenal polyomavirus replication/load levels. In-depth statistical analyses, including mixed effects repeated measures models and logistic regression, revealed two independent histologic variables to be most significantly associated with clinical presentation: intrarenal polyomavirus load levels and Banff interstitial fibrosis ci scores. These two statistically determined histologic variables formed the basis for the definition of three PVN classes that correlated strongest with three clinical parameters: presentation at time of index biopsy, serum creatinine levels/renal function over 24 months of follow-up, and graft failure. The PVN classes 1-3 as described here can easily be recognized in routine renal biopsy specimens. We recommend using this morphologic PVN classification scheme for diagnostic communication, especially at the time of index diagnosis, and in scientific studies to improve comparative data analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Nickeleit
- Division of Nephropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
| | - Harsharan K Singh
- Division of Nephropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Division of Transplantation Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Montefiore, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Cinthia B Drachenberg
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ramneesh Bhatnagar
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Erika Bracamonte
- Department of Pathology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Anthony Chang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - W James Chon
- Renal Transplant Program, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine/Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Darshana Dadhania
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Vicki G Davis
- Division of Nephropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael B Stokes
- Department of Pathology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad F Tungekar
- Histopathology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Surya V Seshan
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dvir R, Paloschi V, Canducci F, Dell'Antonio G, Racca S, Caldara R, Pantaleo G, Clementi M, Secchi A. IL28B rs12979860 genotype as a predictor marker of progression to BKVirus Associated nephropathy, after kidney transplantation. Sci Rep 2017; 7:6746. [PMID: 28751760 PMCID: PMC5532253 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06915-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BK virus (BKV) associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is still an important cause of allograft dysfunction after kidney transplantation (KT). Recent data have shown that the new interferon (IFN)-λ family has been ascribed antiviral properties similar to IFNα, and that the response to IFNλ in kidney is restricted to epithelial cells, suggesting that the IFNλ system evolves as specific protection of the epithelia. We aimed to test the hypothesis of correlation between a single nucleotide polymorphism (C/T dimorphism rs12979860) in the genomic region of IL28B and BKVAN, in patients after KT. Fifty kidney-transplanted patients were included as follow: Group 1 (BKV+/BKVAN+): 11 patients with active BKV- replication and biopsy-proven BKVAN; Group 2 (BKV+/BKVAN-): 22 patients with active BKV- replication but without evidence of BKVAN; Group 3 (BKV-/BKVAN-): 17 patients without evidence of BKV- replication (control group). Here we show that the C/C genotype was statistically higher in group 2 than in group 1 and BKVAN was detected significantly more frequently in patients with C/T and T/T genotypes than in patients with C/C genotype. We therefore propose IL28B polymorphism (rs12979860), as a predictor-marker to differentiate between patients with self-limited, even if persistent, BKV- reactivation and patients with a high risk of progression towards BKVAN, and to modulate the clinical management of these patients accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roee Dvir
- Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vera Paloschi
- Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Canducci
- Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Insubria, Dept. of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Sara Racca
- Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossana Caldara
- Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pantaleo
- UniSR-Social.Lab [Research Methods], Faculty of Psychology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Clementi
- Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Secchi
- Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agrawal N, Echenique IA, Meehan SM, Limaye AP, Cook L, Chang A, Harland RC, Javaid B, Kadambi PV, Matushek S, Williams J, Josephson MA. Variability in assessing for BK viremia: whole blood is not reliable and plasma is not above reproach - a retrospective analysis. Transpl Int 2017; 30:670-678. [PMID: 28295760 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 12/31/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is a major complication of kidney transplantation. Most reports describe polyomavirus viremia either precedes or is detectable at the time of diagnosis of PVN. This association is the basis of current screening recommendations. We retrospectively reviewed the PCR results of blood and urine samples from 29 kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven PVN. Biopsies were performed for a rise in serum creatinine or persistent high-level BK viruria. All biopsies showed polyoma virus large T-antigen expression in tubular epithelium using immunohistochemistry. All had viruria preceding or at the time of biopsy (range, 5.2 × 104 to >25 × 106 BKV DNA copies/ml). Twenty (69%) had viremia ranging from 2.5 × 103 to 4.3 × 106 copies/ml at the time of the biopsy. Via blood BK PCR assay, nine (31%) had no BK viremia detected either preceding or at the time of the biopsy. In five recipients where sufficient specimen permitted, additional plasma BK assessment revealed positive detection of viremia. A comparative analysis of assays from two centres was performed with spiked samples. BK DNA may not be detected in the blood of some kidney transplant recipients with histologically confirmed PVN. This may reflect limitation of whole blood as opposed to plasma-based BK DNA assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neerja Agrawal
- Department of Transplant Nephrology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Ajit P Limaye
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Linda Cook
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Chang
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Basit Javaid
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown, DC, USA
| | | | - Scott Matushek
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gouvêa ALF, Cosendey RIJ, Carvalho FR, Varella RB, de Souza CF, Lopes PF, Silva AA, Rochael MC, de Moraes HP, Lugon JR, Almeida JR. Pilot Study of Early Monitoring Using Urinary Screening for BK Polyomavirus as a Strategy for Prevention of BKV Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:2310-2314. [PMID: 27742286 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urine monitoring programs represent an important strategy for early diagnosis of reactivation of BK polyomavirus (BKV) in kidney transplant recipients. This study analyzes a BKV urine screening model in kidney transplant patients. METHODS Urinary screening for BKV reactivation was performed by urinary decoy cell and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in samples from 32 consecutive kidney transplant patients, collected in a 6-month follow-up period. PCR in plasma samples and BKV immunohistochemical studies to assess BKV renal disease, if a kidney biopsy was indicated, were performed. RESULTS The urinary screening for BKV among 32 renal receptors was positive in 18 patients (56%) by the concomitant use of the decoy cells and/or qualitative PCR at some time during the study period. Transfusion before transplantation was significantly associated with urinary decoy cell positive screening (odds ratio = 11; 95% confidence interval = 1.47 to 82.4; P < .05); and so was male sex (odds ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 3.83; P < .05). The clinical management of screening positive cases consisted of decreasing or changing the immunosuppression regimen. Sixteen renal biopsies were performed. Immunohistochemistry for SV40 T antigen was negative in all biopsies. After 1 year of follow-up, no patient developed BKV-associated nephropathy, and there was no difference in renal function between patients positive and negative for BKV urinary screening. CONCLUSIONS Early urinary monitoring is effective in detection of BKV replication and represents a good strategy to minimize the deleterious effects caused by the presence of the virus on preservation of graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L F Gouvêa
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Departamento de Patologia/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - R I J Cosendey
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - F R Carvalho
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - R B Varella
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - C F de Souza
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - P F Lopes
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Departamento de Patologia/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - A A Silva
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Departamento de Patologia/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - M C Rochael
- Departamento de Patologia/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - H P de Moraes
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas/Anatomia Patológica/Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - J R Lugon
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - J R Almeida
- Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas (LAMAP), Departamento de Medicina Clínica/Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) mainly caused by BK virus (BKV) remains the most common productive viral infection of the kidney. Over the past decade, clinical interest often focused on BK viremia and viruria as the diagnostic mainstays of patient management. The purpose of this review is to discuss viral nephropathy in the context of BK viremia and viruria and new strategies to optimize diagnostic accuracy and patient management. The emerging roles of polyomaviruses in oncogenesis, salivary gland disease, and post-bone marrow transplantation as well as novel Polyomavirus strains are highlighted. Recent findings Areas of investigation include proposals by the Banff working group on the classification of PVN and studies on PVN progression and resolution, including the role cellular immune responses may play during reconstitution injury. New noninvasive strategies to optimize the diagnosis of PVN, that is, the urinary ‘polyomavirus-haufen’ test and mRNA expression levels for BKV in the urine, hold great promise to accurately identify patients with viral nephropathy. Tools are now available to separate ‘presumptive’ from ‘definitive’ disease in various patient cohorts including individuals post-bone marrow transplantation. Recent observations also point to a currently underrecognized role of polyomaviruses in oncogenesis post-transplantation and salivary gland disease in patients with HIV-AIDS. Summary This review summarizes recent studies on PVN and the significance of the BKV strain in disease. Current paradigms for patient management post-(renal) transplantation are discussed in the setting of new observations. Issues that still require clarification and further validation are highlighted.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hässig A, Roos M, Etter A, Bossart W, Müller N, Schiesser M, Wüthrich RP, Fehr T. Association of BK viremia with human leukocyte antigen mismatches and acute rejection, but not with type of calcineurin inhibitor. Transpl Infect Dis 2013; 16:44-54. [PMID: 24134704 DOI: 10.1111/tid.12153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Revised: 03/31/2013] [Accepted: 04/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION BK viremia and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVN) represent a significant problem after kidney transplantation. Both are associated with intensified immunosuppression, but other risk factors and the impact of a screening program on outcome are incompletely understood. METHODS Here, we report on the short- and long-term outcome of a cohort of patients, who were transplanted in 2006/2007 and included in a newly introduced systematic 3-monthly screening for BK viremia at the University Hospital Zurich. In patients testing positive for BK viremia, screening frequency was intensified and immunosuppression reduced. Patients with suspected PVN underwent transplant biopsy. RESULTS Among 152 included patients, 49 (32%) tested positive for BK viremia, but only 8 developed biopsy-proven PVN. BK viremia had a significant impact on estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria in the first 2 years. Acute rejection episodes and the number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches were the strongest independent predictors of BK viremia in a multiple logistic model. In contrast, no particular immunosuppressive agent or regimen was associated with enhanced risk. CONCLUSION Taken together, systematic BK viremia screening led to detection of a high percentage of viremic patients. With adjustment of immunosuppression, an excellent outcome was achieved. The independent association of HLA mismatches with BK viremia suggests impaired polyomavirus immunosurveillance in highly mismatched allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hässig
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuypers DRJ. Management of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012; 8:390-402. [DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW BK virus is one of the most frequent causes of graft loss after renal transplantation, with BK virus-associated nephropathy occurring in roughly 8% of patients, and graft loss rates reported as high as 50%. This review is meant to highlight the literature on BK viral disease following renal transplantation published in the most recent year. RECENT FINDINGS Prevention of BK virus-associated graft loss requires early diagnosis of BK viral replication, which is best achieved by screening for BK viral DNA in the blood. Screening intervals more frequently than the currently recommended 3 months appear to offer increased efficacy. Reduction in immunosuppression remains the mainstay for treatment of BK viral disease, with consideration given to antiviral drug therapy with leflunomide. Acute rejection may be minimized by a short course of intravenous immunoglobulin. Sirolimus appears to be a promising addition to the therapeutic armamentarium. For patients requiring re-transplantation after BK virus-associated graft loss, viral clearance from the bloodstream prior to re-transplantation should be achieved to attain optimal results. SUMMARY BK virus is a major pathogen affecting renal allografts, although intensive surveillance and targeted dose reduction in immunosuppression with the consideration of additional antiviral drug therapy can minimize graft loss resulting from infection.
Collapse
|
12
|
Anzivino E, Bellizzi A, Mitterhofer AP, Tinti F, Barile M, Colosimo MT, Fioriti D, Mischitelli M, Chiarini F, Ferretti G, Taliani G, Pietropaolo V. Early monitoring of the human polyomavirus BK replication and sequencing analysis in a cohort of adult kidney transplant patients treated with basiliximab. Virol J 2011; 8:407. [PMID: 21849069 PMCID: PMC3179958 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422x-8-407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2011] [Accepted: 08/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Nowadays, better immunosuppressors have decreased the rates of acute rejection in kidney transplantation, but have also led to the emergence of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Therefore, we prospectively investigated BKV load in plasma and urine samples in a cohort of kidney transplants, receiving basiliximab combined with a mycophenolate mofetil-based triple immunotherapy, to evaluate the difference between BKV replication during the first 3 months post-transplantation, characterized by the non-depleting action of basiliximab, versus the second 3 months, in which the maintenance therapy acts alone. We also performed sequencing analysis to assess whether a particular BKV subtype/subgroup or transcriptional control region (TCR) variants were present. Methods We monitored BK viruria and viremia by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) at 12 hours (Tx), 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 6 (T3) months post-transplantation among 60 kidney transplant patients. Sequencing analysis was performed by nested-PCR with specific primers for TCR and VP1 regions. Data were statistically analyzed using χ2 test and Student's t-test. Results BKV was detected at Tx in 4/60 urine and in 16/60 plasma, with median viral loads of 3,70 log GEq/mL and 3,79 log GEq/mL, respectively, followed by a significant increase of both BKV-positive transplants (32/60) and median values of viruria (5,78 log GEq/mL) and viremia (4,52 log GEq/mL) at T2. Conversely, a significantly decrease of patients with viruria and viremia (17/60) was observed at T3, together with a reduction of the median urinary and plasma viral loads (4,09 log GEq/mL and 4,00 log GEq/mL, respectively). BKV TCR sequence analysis always showed the presence of archetypal sequences, with a few single-nucleotide substitutions and one nucleotide insertion that, interestingly, were all representative of the particular subtypes/subgroups we identified by VP1 sequencing analysis: I/b-2 and IV/c-2. Conclusions Our results confirm previous studies indicating that BKV replication may occur during the early hours after kidney transplantation, reaches the highest incidence in the third post-transplantation month and then decreases within the sixth month, maybe due to induction therapy. Moreover, it might become clinically useful whether specific BKV subtypes or rearrangements could be linked to a particular disease state in order to detect them before BKVAN onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Anzivino
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|