Desensitization Protocol in Highly HLA-Sensitized and ABO-Incompatible High Titer Kidney Transplantation

Outcome of desensitization in human leukocyte antigen and ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: Single center experience of first 200 incompatible transplants

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although desensitization is well established, concerns about graft outcome, patient survival and rejection still exist. The present study aims at comparing outcomes of renal transplant recipients across simultaneous ABO and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility barriers to those with ABO or HLA incompatibility alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted from October 2015 to December 2018. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, who were prospective HLA incompatible (HLAi) and/or ABO incompatible (ABOi) renal transplant recipients were included. A total of 400 cases including 36 ABOi transplants, 154 HLAi transplants, 10 simultaneously ABO and HLA incompatible transplants, and 200 ABO (ABOc) and HLA (HLAc) compatible kidney transplants from living donors were included.

RESULTS

There were significantly more number of blood transfusions, previous transplants and pregnancies in HLAi transplant recipients relative to the ABOi or the control group. Mean number of therapeutic plasma exchange procedures per patient and mean plasma volume processed per procedure were slightly higher in the ABOi + HLAi category. The incidence of graft dysfunction due to suspected antibody-mediated rejection during first year was highest in the ABOi + HLAi group, followed by ABOc + HLAi and ABOi + HLAc, lowest in the ABOc + HLAc category. Mean time to first episode of graft dysfunction was significantly shorter with incompatible transplants. There were no kidney transplant recipient deaths in the study.

CONCLUSION

Patient outcome and graft outcomes observed with incompatible transplants were not worse than those observed with compatible transplants.

ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation After Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Case Report

Many studies have been made on ABO-compatible kidney transplants following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, there have been few reports on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We report on the case of a successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with high titers after bone marrow transplantation experienced no infectious episodes. The patient was a 38-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease resulting from interstitial nephritis induced by drug toxicity or graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). He had received allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from a human leukocyte antigen-identical unrelated donor to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia. The patient with high anti-B antibody titers (IgM 1:1024 IgG 1:256) received a desensitization protocol consisting of 2 doses of rituximab and 5 courses of plasmapheresis. The patient had prolonged depletion of circulating B cells 2 years after the transplant and was infected with cytomegalovirus viremia, pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, and adenovirus urinary tract infection at 2, 3, and 17 months post-transplant, respectively. Currently, at 6 years after his transplant, the patient has had no rejection and is in good clinical condition with only mild renal insufficiency. Our results suggest that ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation may be an effective renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease after HSCT, but desensitization in combination with immunosuppressants could lead to a state of over-immunosuppression, causing various infections.

Proteasomal adaptations underlying carfilzomib-resistance in human bone marrow plasma cells

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have a deleterious effect on allografts and remain a major immunologic barrier in transplantation. Current therapies to eliminate DSAs are ineffective in highly HLA-sensitized patients. Proteasome inhibitors have been employed as a strategy to target bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), the source of long-term antibody production; however, their efficacy has been limited by poorly defined drug-resistance mechanisms. Here, we performed transcriptomic profiling of CD138⁺ BMPCs that survived in vivo desensitization therapy with the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to identify mechanisms of drug resistance. The results revealed a genomic signature that included increased expression of the immunoproteasome, a highly specialized proteasomal variant. Western blotting and functional studies demonstrated that catalytically active immunoproteasomes and the immunoproteasome activator PA28 were upregulated in carfilzomib-resistant BMPCs. Carfilzomib-resistant BMPCs displayed reduced sensitivity to the proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib, bortezomib, and ixazomib, but enhanced sensitivity to an immunoproteasome-specific inhibitor ONX-0914. Finally, in vitro carfilzomib treatment of BMPCs from HLA-sensitized patients increased levels of the immunoproteasome β5i (PSMB8) catalytic subunit suggesting that carfilzomib therapy directly induces an adaptive immunoproteasome response. Taken together, our results indicate that carfilzomib induces structural changes in proteasomes and immunoproteasome formation.

Excellent outcome after desensitization in high immunologic risk kidney transplantation

Introduction

HLA-incompatible (HLAi) and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) has been on the increase over the last decade. However, there are wide variations in outcomes from these procedures. In this study we evaluated the graft and patient outcomes in incompatible KT and non-sensitized KT.

Methods

Patients who underwent KT between January 2012 and April 2018 were enrolled and reviewed. We divided kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) into five groups as follows: HLAi (n = 50); ABOi (n = 65); HLAi+ABOi (n = 5); control (n = 428); and living-donor control (LD control, n = 218). We compared the risk of rejection, graft function, graft survival, and patient survival between incompatible KTRs and control/LD control KTRs.

Results

Although the incidence of active antibody-mediated rejection in HLAi group tends to be higher than in control and LD control groups (6.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.20; 6.0% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.44, respectively), the rejection-free survival, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different from those of the control and LD control groups in all three incompatible KT groups (all P>0.05). Graft function during the study period was also not different between incompatible KTRs and control/LD control groups (both P>0.05). Using Cox regression analysis, neither HLAi nor ABOi were risk factors for graft failure. Some infectious diseases such as urinary tract infection and cytomegalovirus infection were more common in the HLAi group than in the control/LD control group (both P<0.05), but only one infection-related death occurred in HLAi KTRs. Infection risks were similar in the ABOi and HLAi+ABOi groups compared to controls.

Conclusion

Our results showed favorable outcomes for incompatible KT after desensitization. Although desensitization therapy for incompatible KT has improved access to transplantation for KT candidates with high immunological risk, more clinical data are clearly needed.

Latest insights on ABO-incompatible living-donor renal transplantation

This review summarizes the latest insights on ABO‐incompatible living‐donor renal transplantation. Desensitization protocols and clinical outcomes were investigated, and a comparison was made with kidney‐paired donation, which is not permitted in Japan for ethical reasons. Although renal transplantation is greatly beneficial for most patients with end‐stage kidney disease, many of these patients must remain on dialysis therapy for extended periods due to the scarcity of organs from deceased donors. ABO blood type incompatibility was once believed to be a contraindication to renal transplantation due to the increased risk for antibody‐mediated rejection and early graft loss attributable to isoagglutinins. Recently, pretransplant desensitization strategies, such as removal of isoagglutinins and antibody‐producing cells, have achieved successful outcomes, although it remains unclear whether graft survival and patient morbidity are equivalent to those for ABO‐compatible renal transplantation. The present review suggested that ABO‐incompatible living‐donor renal transplantation might be a favorable radical renal replacement therapy for patients with end‐stage kidney disease.

Pilot Experience with ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation as a Second Transplant

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in immunosuppressant medications, improvement in long-term survival for kidney transplant recipients has been more difficult to achieve. In fact, the number of patients with failing grafts who must either return to dialysis or undergo a second transplant is increasing. Second transplantation is associated with reduced mortality rates compared to remaining on dialysis after an initial graft loss. Nowadays, excellent ABO-incompatible kidney transplant outcomes have been achieved. However, there have been no reports on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation as a second transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three patients who received their graft from an ABO-incompatible living donor at our institution as a second transplant were enrolled in this study. We focused on immunosuppressive therapy for second ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, donor-specific antibody status before the second transplant, patient and graft survivals, and complications.

RESULTS

All 3 patients successfully underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation as a second transplant with a follow-up period of 141, 39, and 24 months. Patient and graft survival rates were 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation may be an acceptable treatment for patients who need a second renal replacement therapy after their initial graft failure.

Clinical Outcomes of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease due to Diabetes Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Diabetes nephropathy is one of the most common causes of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. The data are clear that kidney transplantation is superior to remaining on dialysis for patients with diabetes. However, there have been no reports on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in patients with ESKD due to diabetes nephropathy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study to investigate the clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation for patients with pre-existing diabetes nephropathy at our institution from April 2011 to October 2017. A total of 14 recipients were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

All 14 patients underwent successful kidney transplantation. Both overall patient and graft survival rates were 100, 89.9, and 89.9% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. One patient died 20 months after transplantation with a functioning graft due to pancreas cancer. Two of the 14 patients (14.3%) developed biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection during the follow-up period. The median observation period was 32.0 months (range 5-83 months).

CONCLUSION

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation may be an acceptable renal replacement therapy for ESKD patients with diabetes.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation as a renal replacement therapy-A single low-volume center experience in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Living donor kidney transplantation is preferable to deceased donor transplantation due to its superior long-term patient and graft survivals. However, ABO blood group incompatibility is a major barrier to living donor kidney transplantation. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation has been performed in Japan since the late 1980's, but it is still globally uncommon. The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABO-IKT) with that of ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABO-CKT) at an institution where only about two kidney transplants are performed a month on average.

DESIGN

A single center propensity score-matched cohort study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of 240 patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at Osaka City University Hospital from January 1999 to December 2016, of which 66 patients were ABO-IKT. The remaining 174 patients who underwent ABO-CKT were studied as the control group, and the clinical outcomes of ABO-IKT and ABO-CKT recipients were compared based on propensity score matching.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in both patient survival and death-censored graft survival rates between the ABO-IKT and ABO-CKT groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate as well as frequency of acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, infectious adverse events, malignancies, and post-operative bleeding between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Currently, ABO-IKT may be an acceptable treatment for patients with ESKD even at a low-volume transplant center.

Clinical significance of CCR7+CD8+ T cells in kidney transplant recipients with allograft rejection

The regulatory function of CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T cells against effector T-cells involved in T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) in kidney transplant recipients was investigated. In vitro experiments explored the ability of CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T cells to suppress T-cell proliferation under T-cell activation conditions or during coculture with human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (HRPTEpiC). In an ex vivo experiment, the proportion of CCR7⁺/CD8⁺, FOXP3⁺/CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T and effector T-cell subsets were compared between the normal biopsy control (NC, n = 17) and TCMR group (n = 17). The CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T cells significantly suppressed the proliferation of CD4⁺ T cells and significantly decreased the proportion of IFN-γ⁺ and IL-17⁺/CD4⁺ T cells and inflammatory cytokine levels (all p < 0.05). After coculturing with HRPTEpiC, CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T cells also suppressed T-cell differentiation into IL-2⁺, IFN-γ⁺, and IL-17⁺/CD4⁺ T cells (all p < 0.05). The TCMR group had significantly fewer CCR7⁺/CD8⁺ and FOXP3⁺/CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T in comparison with the NC group, but the proportions of all three effector T-cell subsets were increased in the TCMR group (all p < 0.05). The proportion of CCR7⁺/CD8⁺ T was inversely correlated with those of effector T-cell subsets. The results indicate that CCR7⁺CD8⁺ T cells may regulate effector T-cells involved in TCMR in an in vitro and in an ex vivo transplant model.

ABO-Incompatible Living Kidney Transplant Recipients from Spousal Donors Receiving Rituximab

INTRODUCTION

We summarized our experience with ABO-incompatible living kidney transplant recipients from spousal donors receiving rituximab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2006 and December 2014, 82 patients with end-stage renal disease underwent living donor kidney transplantation at Osaka City University Hospital, of which 23 cases were ABO-incompatible transplantation between spouses with rituximab induction. We analyzed these recipients, focusing on their immunosuppressive protocols, frequency of acute rejections, and patient/graft survivals.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival rates were 100%. The incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) was 30.4%. One patient experienced antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and intractable ACR, 2 had AMR, and 2 had intractable ACR episodes that were treated using thymoglobulin.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation between spouses using rituximab is a radical but effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, this procedure could be immunologically high risk due to ABO-incompatibility and poor histocompatibility.

Advances in pharmacotherapy to treat kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Current immunosuppressive combination therapy provides excellent prevention of T-cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation; however, antibody-mediated rejection remains of high concern and accounts for a large number of long-term allograft losses. The recent development of protocol biopsies resulted in the definition of subclinical rejection (SCR), showing histologic evidence for rejection but unremarkable clinical course.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current knowledge and evidence of pharmacotherapy to treat kidney allograft rejections and covers SCR treatment options. Each substance is analyzed with regard to its classical indication and further discussed for the treatment of other forms of rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a lack of randomized trials, early acute T-cell-mediated rejection can be treated effectively in most cases without graft loss. The necessity to treat SCR is currently unclear. Due to a lack of effective therapies, new treatment approaches for antibody-mediated rejection are an urgent medical need to improve long-term outcomes. Future research should aim to better define pathophysiology and histology, stratify risk, and develop rational treatment strategies from randomized controlled trials, in order to establish the value of novel therapies in the arsenal of rejection pharmacotherapy. However, the effective prevention of rejection with minimal side effects still remains the goal in immunosuppression.

Impact of ABO Incompatibility on the Development of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Presensitized to HLA

Whether the coexistence of anti-A/B antibody and donor specific anti-HLA antibody (HLA-DSA) has a synergistic impact on the development of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is unclear. This study includes 92 KTRs who received a kidney from an ABO-incompatible (ABOi) donor or were presensitized to donor HLA (HLAs) and 292 controls (CONT). HLAs was defined as a crossmatch positivity or the presence of HLA-DSA. We compared the incidence of AAMR among ABOi (n = 58), ABOi+HLAs (n = 12), HLAs (n = 22), and CONT (n = 292) groups and evaluated the risk factors and antibody type (anti-A/B vs. HLA-DSA) responsible for AAMR. AAMR developed less frequently in ABOi and CONT than in the ABOi+HLAs or HLAs (P < 0.05 for all); however, there was no difference between the ABOi+HLAs and HLAs groups. AAMR developed more frequently with strong HLA-DSA at baseline; however, high baseline anti-A/B titer did not affect AAMR development. Strong baseline HLA-DSA was an independent predictor for AAMR, however the baseline anti-A/B titer was not. All four AAMR episodes in ABOi+HLAs were positive to HLA-DSA but not to anti-A/B. In conclusion, ABO incompatibility does not increase the risk for AAMR in HLAs KTRs.

Clinical Outcome of Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients from Spousal Donors

INTRODUCTION

Patients aged 60 years and older stand for the fastest growing group of patients with end-stage renal disease worldwide, and the need for kidney transplants among this population is rising. In Japan, living donor kidney transplantation is mainly performed to deal with the severe shortage of deceased donors, and the number of spousal transplants is currently increasing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 164 patients with ESRD underwent living donor kidney transplantation at our institution, of whom 21 patients aged 60 years and older had spousal kidney transplantation. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation was performed in 5 of the 21 cases. We analyzed these recipients.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival rates were 100%. The incidence of acute rejection was 23.8%. Eight patients experienced cytomegalovirus viremia, two patients experienced Pneumocystis jiroveci infection, and one experienced bacterial pneumonia. Two patients developed cancers and underwent curative operation after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly kidney transplantation from spousal donors is associated with age-related immune dysfunction, which may develop infections and malignancies and could be immunologically high risk due to the high rate of ABO-incompatibility and poor histocompatibility. An effort to minimize the adverse effect of immunosuppression and to reduce the risk of acute rejection may be needed for an excellent long-term outcome.

Outcomes of combination therapy for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation

AIM

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) in renal transplant patients has poor allograft outcomes. However, treatment strategy has not been established yet. Herein, we present short-term outcomes of combination therapy for CAMR.

METHODS

We identified nine patients with CAMR or suspicious CAMR who were treated with antihumoral therapy from 2010 to 2011 and analyzed their medical records retrospectively.

RESULTS

Five patients had CAMR, and four patients had suspicious CAMR. Severe transplant glomerulopathy (TG) was observed in seven patients. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was decreased in all patients before treatment. We used three different treatment regimens: (i) high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab; (ii) high-dose IVIG, rituximab, and bortezomib; and (iii) plasmapheresis with low-dose IVIG, rituximab and bortezomib. After treatment with one of these three regimens, graft function improved or stabilized in six patients, whereas three patients showed further deterioration of eGFR. The third regimen suppressed deterioration of renal function in all patients. Most patients showed no progression of proteinuria. Infectious complications due to Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and herpes zoster occurred in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy for CAMR might be effective, even in patients with relatively late-stage CAMR.

Late-onset neutropenia and acute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients receiving rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil

INTRODUCTION

Using rituximab, we have performed successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations in recipients without splenectomy as well as in those with high pretransplant anti-A/B antibody titers. A common and increasingly recognized toxicity of rituximab is late-onset neutropenia (LON), defined as unexplained grades III to IV neutropenia occurring at least 4weeks after the last dose of rituximab in the absence of an alternative explanation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2006 and December 2011, 25 patients who received rituximab underwent successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation and were enrolled as the subjects in this study. The incidence rate and clinical features of LON as well as the relationship between LON and acute rejection in these patients were studied.

RESULTS

Twelve recipients (48%) experienced LON 2 to 12months after transplantation. Five of the 12 patients (41.6%) who developed LON had an episode of biopsy-confirmed acute cellular rejection, as compared with one of the 13 patients (7.7%) who did not develop LON. Moreover, 3 patients who experienced LON developed steroid and deoxyspergualin-resistant acute cellular rejection requiring OKT-3 administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of acute cellular rejection was higher in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients with LON than in those without LON. Our findings suggested that these recipients who developed LON after rituximab administration may be at an increased risk for acute cellular rejection.

Desensitization for solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Desensitization protocols are being used worldwide to enable kidney transplantation across immunologic barriers, i.e. antibody to donor HLA or ABO antigens, which were once thought to be absolute contraindications to transplantation. Desensitization protocols are also being applied to permit transplantation of HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cells to patients with antibody to donor HLA, to enhance the opportunity for transplantation of non-renal organs, and to treat antibody-mediated rejection. Although desensitization for organ transplantation carries an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, ultimately these transplants extend and enhance the quality of life for solid organ recipients, and desensitization that permits transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells is life saving for patients with limited donor options. Complex patient factors and variability in treatment protocols have made it difficult to identify, precisely, the mechanisms underlying the downregulation of donor-specific antibodies. The mechanisms underlying desensitization may differ among the various protocols in use, although there are likely to be some common features. However, it is likely that desensitization achieves a sort of immune detente by first reducing the immunologic barrier and then by creating an environment in which an autoregulatory process restricts the immune response to the allograft.

Conversion of stable ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients from mycophenolate mofetil with standard exposure calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to everolimus with very low exposure CNIs-a short-term pilot study

BACKGROUND

A recent report has demonstrated that as with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), everolimus is capable of inhibiting human B-lymphocyte function and activation including B-lymphocyte proliferation, apoptosis, and immunoglobulin production in vitro. Everolimus may therefore be used as an immunosuppressant in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A three-month pilot study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of conversion of stable ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients from MMF with standard exposure calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to everolimus with very low exposure CNIs. Sixteen recipients were enrolled in the study. The patients without acute rejection by graft biopsy were switched from MMF to everolimus with CNI minimization. At three months after conversion, graft biopsies were performed to check for acute rejection and C4d deposition.

RESULTS

Conversion to everolimus with CNI minimization for three months did not induce acute rejection and C4d deposition in all of the ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients. A slight elevation of anti-A/B antibody titer occurred in our present study. Everolimus was associated with hyperlipidemia and edema.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated that short-term conversion from MMF to everolimus after one yr post-transplant may be a safe and effective alternate for ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients requiring temporary discontinuation of MMF.

Rituximab prevents an anamnestic response in patients with cryptic sensitization to HLA

BACKGROUND

Some patients sensitized to HLA antigens do not have antibody present in serum specimens that are available before transplantation. However, such patients are at risk for an anamnestic response resulting from a proinflammatory response to the trauma of transplant surgery. Quantifying HLA-specific B cells provides a way to identify these patients and provide treatment to prevent an anamnestic response.

METHODS

B cells were isolated before transplantation from 59 patients, 20 of whom were treated with rituximab at the time of transplantation. Ninety-nine tests were performed to quantify HLA-specific B cells by staining with HLA tetramers. Patients were considered sensitized or nonsensitized based on the frequencies of HLA-specific B cells. Pretransplantation and posttransplantation sera were tested for the detection of antibody specific for the tetramer antigen.

RESULTS

Of the 24 cases where patients were considered sensitized to HLA antigens but did not have antibody before transplantation, no posttransplantation antibody to the tetramer antigen was detected in 10 cases when patients were treated with rituximab, but antibody was detected in 13 of 16 cases when there was no rituximab treatment (P=0.00006). The mean frequencies of B cells specific for HLA-B7 were the same in rituximab-treated patients who did not make antibody and in nontreated patients who did make antibody (6.0% vs. 5.7%; P=0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Elimination of peripheral HLA-specific B cells in patients who are sensitized to HLA antigens but lacking detectable antibody abrogates an anamnestic response.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in elderly patients over 60 years of age

Introduction

Patients aged 60 years and older represent the fastest-growing population with end-stage renal disease worldwide, and the need for a kidney transplant among this population is increasing. Due to the severe shortage of deceased donors in Japan, ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation has been performed since the late 1980s. Excellent long-term outcomes have been achieved, and the rates of graft survival in these patients are currently similar to those in recipients of ABO-compatible grafts. However, the outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in elderly patients over 60 years of age have not been well studied yet.

Patients and methods

We studied 4 elderly kidney transplant patients who received their grafts from ABO-incompatible living donors at our institution between December 2006 and December 2011, focusing on the immunosuppressive protocols, complications and graft survivals. The mean observation period was 21.5 months (range, 8 months to 62 months). Our immunosuppressive protocols were as follows: to remove the anti-A/B antibodies, the patients underwent 4–8 sessions of double-filtration plasmapheresis and/or plasma exchange prior to kidney transplantation until the anti-A/B titers were less than 1:16. For the patients with low anti-A/B titers (<1:512), the immunosuppressive protocol consisted of a single dose of rituximab (150 mg/m²). The patients with high anti-A/B antibody titers (≥1:512) underwent splenectomy and received 2 doses of rituximab. The pretransplant immunosuppressive protocol included B-lymphocyte suppression with 4 weeks of mycophenolate mofetil (0.5 g/day for low-titer protocol and 1 g/day for high-titer protocol).

Results

All 4 patients underwent successful transplantation. At the end of follow-up, their mean serum creatinine was 1.18 mg/dl. No patient experienced antibody-mediated rejection or acute cellular rejection. Late-onset neutropenia occurred in two cases. Two cases experienced cytomegalovirus reactivation by cytomegalovirus antigenemia. In one patient, diffuse hemorrhage required surgical intervention. However, there were no severe complications.

Conclusions

Although a careful evaluation of patients is needed, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation may become a viable treatment option for elderly patients with end-stage renal disease.

Excellent outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Due to the severe shortage of deceased donors in Japan, ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation has been performed since the late 1980s. Excellent long-term outcomes have been achieved; the rates of graft survival among these patients are currently similar to those of recipients of ABO-compatible grafts. Our single-center experience describing the immunosuppressive protocols, complications, and grafts survivals is documented in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 123 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between January 1999 and December 2010, 25 cases were ABO-incompatible grafts. All of these patients were followed until August 2011. Analyzing these patients, we focused on their immunosuppressive protocols, complications, and graft survivals.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival rates were 100%. One patient experienced antibody-mediated rejection and an intractable acute cellular rejection episode, 1 patient an antibody-mediated rejection, and 6 patients had acute cellular rejection episodes. However, there were no severe complications.

CONCLUSION

Although ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is a high-risk procedure, a short-term graft survival rate of 100% may be expected due to recent significant improvements in desensitization and recipient management.

Infectious risks and optimal strength of maintenance immunosuppressants in rituximab-treated kidney transplantation

Background

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, effectively depletes B lymphocytes. It is not clear whether the use of conventional doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methylprednisolone and tacrolimus as maintenance immunosuppression in rituximab-treated kidney transplantation is associated with increased risk.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 67 patients who underwent HLA-sensitized or ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation after one dose of rituximab (200 or 500 mg) (group 1). Eighty-seven kidney transplant recipients who did not require rituximab served as a control (group 2).

Results

Cytomegalovirus infection (16.4 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.031) and pneumonia (9.0 vs. 1.1%, p = 0.043) occurred more often in group 1, and 2 patients of group 1 died of infection. The doses of methylprednisolone and tacrolimus levels of the two groups were not different. MMF dose was reduced when serious infection occurred. The doses of MMF (in grams/day) at the following times postoperatively were lower in group 1 than in group 2: 1 month: 1.26 ± 0.42 vs. 1.40 ± 0.39, p = 0.033; 3 months: 1.14 ± 0.51 vs. 1.36 ± 0.39, p = 0.011; 6 months: 1.07 ± 0.50 vs. 1.30 ± 0.42, p = 0.012; 1 year: 0.88 ± 0.52 vs. 1.19 ± 0.44, p = 0.009; 2 years: 0.69 ± 0.55 vs. 1.25 ± 0.49, p = 0.059, but the reduction of MMF doses did not increase the incidence of acute rejection in group 1 (4.5% in group 1 vs. 9.2% in group 2, p = 0.351). If patients who died with functioning graft were excluded, graft survival was 98.5% in group 1 and 100% in group 2.

Conclusions

Serious infectious complications were increased in rituximab-treated kidney transplant recipients and it might be adequate to reduce the MMF dose from the early postoperative period.