1
|
Paka P, Lieber SR, Lee RA, Desai CS, Dupuis RE, Barritt AS. Perioperative glucose management and outcomes in liver transplant recipients: A qualitative systematic review. World J Transplant 2018; 8:75-83. [PMID: 29988867 PMCID: PMC6033739 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the relationship between post-liver transplantation (LT) glycemic control and LT outcomes. METHODS A qualitative systematic review on relevant prospective interventions designed to control glucose levels including insulin protocols. Studies investigating an association between glycemic control and post-LT outcomes such as mortality, graft rejection, and infection rate were reviewed. PubMed, EMBASE, and other databases were searched through October 2016. RESULTS Three thousands, six hundreds and ninety-two patients from 14 studies were included. Higher mortality rate was seen when blood glucose (BG) ≥ 150 mg/dL (P = 0.05). BG ≥ 150 mg/dL also led to higher rates of infection. Higher rates of graft rejection were seen at BG > 200 mg/dL (P < 0.001). Mean BG ≥ 200 mg/dL was associated with more infections (P = 0.002). Nurse-initiated protocols and early screening strategies have shown a reduction in negative post-LT outcomes. CONCLUSION Hyperglycemia in the perioperative period is associated with poor post-LT outcomes. Only a few prospective studies have designed interventions aimed at managing post-LT hyperglycemia, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and their impact on post-LT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prani Paka
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| | - Sarah R Lieber
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| | - Ruth-Ann Lee
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| | - Chirag S Desai
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| | - Robert E Dupuis
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| | - Alfred Sidney Barritt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silva TE, Ronsoni MF, Schiavon LL. Challenges in diagnosing and monitoring diabetes in patients with chronic liver diseases. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2018; 12:431-440. [PMID: 29279271 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence and mortality of diabetes mellitus and liver disease have risen in recent years. The liver plays an important role in glucose homeostasis, and various chronic liver diseases have a negative effect on glucose metabolism with the consequent emergence of diabetes. Some aspects related to chronic liver disease can affect diagnostic tools and the monitoring of diabetes and other glucose metabolism disorders, and clinicians must be aware of these limitations in their daily practice. In cirrhotic patients, fasting glucose may be normal in up until 23% of diabetes cases, and glycated hemoglobin provides falsely low results, especially in advanced cirrhosis. Similarly, the performance of alternative glucose monitoring tests, such as fructosamine, glycated albumin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol, also appears to be suboptimal in chronic liver disease. This review will examine the association between changes in glucose metabolism and various liver diseases as well as the particularities associated with the diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes in liver disease patients. Alternatives to routinely recommended tests will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Telma E Silva
- Division of Gastroenterology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Trindade Florianópolis, SC, 88040-970, Brazil.
| | - Marcelo F Ronsoni
- Division of Endocrinology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-970, Brazil
| | - Leonardo L Schiavon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Trindade Florianópolis, SC, 88040-970, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
New-onset diabetes is a frequent complication after solid organ transplantation. Although a number of common factors are associated with the disease, including recipient age, body mass index, hepatitis C infection, and use of immunosuppressive drugs, new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation (NODALT) has the following unique aspects and thus needs to be considered its own entity. First, a liver graft becomes the patient's primary metabolic regulator after liver transplantation, but this would not be the case for kidney or other grafts. The metabolic states, as well as the genetics of the graft, play crucial roles in the development of NODALT. Second, dysfunction of the islets of Langerhans is common in cirrhotic patients and would be exacerbated by immunosuppressive agents, particularly calcineurin inhibitors. On the other hand, minimized immunosuppressive protocols have been widely advocated in liver transplantation because of liver tolerance (immune privilege). Third and last, through the "gut-liver axis," graft function is closely linked to gut microbiota, which is now considered an important metabolic organ and known to independently influence the host's metabolic homeostasis. Liver transplant recipients present with specific gut microbiota that may be prone to trigger metabolic disorders. In this review, we proposed 3 possible sites for the origin of NODALT, which are liver, islets, and gut, to help elucidate the underlying mechanism of NODALT.
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiménez-Pérez M, González-Grande R, Omonte Guzmán E, Amo Trillo V, Rodrigo López JM. Metabolic complications in liver transplant recipients. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:6416-6423. [PMID: 27605877 PMCID: PMC4968123 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The metabolic syndrome (MS), which includes obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and hyperglycaemia according to the most widely accepted definitions now used, is one of the most common post-transplant complications, with a prevalence of 44%-58%. The MS, together with the immunosuppression, is considered the main risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transplant recipients, which in turn accounts for 19%-42% of all deaths unrelated to the graft. The presence of MS represents a relative risk for the development of CVD and death of 1.78. On the other hand, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), considered as the manifestation of the MS in the liver, is now the second leading reason for liver transplantation in the United States after hepatitis C and alcohol. NAFLD has a high rate of recurrence in the liver graft and a direct relation with the worsening of other metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance or diabetes mellitus. Consequently, it is vitally important to identify and treat as soon as possible such modifiable factors as hypertension, overweight, hyperlipidaemia or diabetes in transplanted patients to thus minimise the impact on patient survival. Additionally, steroid-free regimens are favoured, with minimal immunosuppression to limit the possible effects on the development of the MS.
Collapse
|
5
|
The association between polyomavirus BK strains and BKV viruria in liver transplant recipients. Sci Rep 2016; 6:28491. [PMID: 27338010 PMCID: PMC4919687 DOI: 10.1038/srep28491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus that cause of allograft dysfunction among kidney transplant recipients. The role of BKV infection in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients is not well understood neither for the relationship between various BKV strains with occurrence of BKV viral viruria. This study aimed to understand the prevalence of BKV infection and identified of BKV various strains in the urine of liver transplant recipients. There was not significant difference of renal outcome between high BKV viruria and low BKV viruria in the liver transplant recipients. The WW-non-coding control region (NCCR) BKV detected in urine was associated with higher urinary BKV load, whereas the Dunlop-NCCR BKV was detected in the urine of low urinary BKV load. An in vitro cultivation system demonstrated that WW-BKV strain exhibiting the higher viral DNA replication efficiency and higher BKV load. Altogether, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of BKV strains on the occurrence of BK viruria in the liver transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Li DW, Lu TF, Hua XW, Dai HJ, Cui XL, Zhang JJ, Xia Q. Risk factors for new onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:6329-6340. [PMID: 26034369 PMCID: PMC4445111 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2014] [Revised: 10/16/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To determine the risk factors for new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after liver transplantation by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We electronically searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from January 1980 to December 2013 to identify relevant studies reporting risk factors for NODM after liver transplantation. Two authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data. Discrepancies were resolved in consultation with a third reviewer. All statistical analyses were performed with the RevMan5.0 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using either a fixed effects or a random effects model, based on the presence (I2 < 50%) or absence (I2 > 50%) of significant heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty studies with 4580 patients were included in the meta-analysis, all of which were retrospective. The meta-analysis identified the following significant risk factors: hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (OR = 2.68; 95%CI: 1.92-3.72); a family history of diabetes (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.09-2.63, P < 0.00001); male gender (OR = 1.53; 95%CI: 1.24-1.90; P < 0.0001); impaired fasting glucose (IFG; OR = 3.27; 95%CI: 1.84-5.81; P < 0.0001); a family history of diabetes (OR = 1.69; 95%CI: 1.09-2.63; P = 0.02); use of tacrolimus (OR = 1.34; 95%CI: 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03) and body mass index (BMI)(WMD = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.69-1.68, P < 0.00001). Other factors, such as hepatitis B virus infection and alcoholism, were not found to be associated with the incidence of NODM.
CONCLUSION: The study showed that HCV infection, IFG, a family history of diabetes, male gender, tacrolimus and BMI are risk factors for NODM after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Saab S, Trimble G, Mishra A, Henry L. The association of hepatitis C virus infection and post-liver transplant diabetes: data from 17 000 HCV-infected transplant recipients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41:209-17. [PMID: 25413020 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2014] [Revised: 09/08/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with metabolic manifestations including insulin resistance and diabetes through various mechanisms. Whether HCV infection is associated with an increased risk of post-transplant diabetes in liver transplant recipients is unclear. AIM To assess the association of HCV infection with post-transplant diabetes. METHODS All liver transplant recipients infected with hepatitis C (exposed) and hepatitis B (HBV) (controls) with post-transplant follow-up from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2003-2012) were included. RESULTS A total of 17 121 HCV patients and 1450 HBV controls were included in this observational study. Subjects with HCV were more likely to be overweight and obese at transplant, but the rate of pre-transplant diabetes of 13.7% was similar to HBV (P > 0.05). Post-transplant, 32.5% of HCV patients and 27.5% of HBV patients had diabetes (P < 0.0001). This difference was observed starting as early as 6 months post-transplant: 22.5% HCV and 18.9% HBV (P = 0.0043). With longer follow-up, both the cumulative and incidental risks of developing post-transplant diabetes were consistently higher in HCV patients. In particular, by 5 years post-transplant, both the relative risk of having diabetes [1.18 (1.08-1.29), P = 0.0002] and the hazard ratio for time to developing diabetes [1.27 (1.15-1.41), P < 0.0001] were significantly higher in HCV patients compared to HBV patients. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for confounders including the use of immunosuppressants, hepatitis C infection was independently associated with developing post-transplant diabetes: aHR = 1.55 (1.34-1.79), P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION Hepatitis C infection is associated with a higher risk of post-transplant diabetes that persists up to 5 years post-transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Younossi
- Department of Medicine, Center for Liver Diseases, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gámán G, Sárváry E, Gelley F, Doros A, Görög D, Fehérvári I, Kóbori L, Wágner L, Nemes B. New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and the Analysis of Dipeptidyl-Peptidase-4 After Liver Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2014; 46:2177-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.05.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
9
|
Predictive Factors of Sustained Virological Response for Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus After Liver Transplantation: The Hungarian Experience. Transplant Proc 2012; 44:2162-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
10
|
Hübscher SG. Steatosis and fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C infection: complex interactions providing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Liver Transpl 2011; 17:1374-9. [PMID: 22006866 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|