Potent immunosuppression for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation may not be a risk factor for malignancy

Success rate and safety of living donor kidney transplantation in ABO blood group incompatible relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation relies on two principles: (i) removal of antibodies from a blood group; and (ii) inhibition of reappearance of blood group antibodies by intensifying the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. This systematic review aimed to analyze the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline were searched. Search duration was from the database establishment to December 2022. A thorough search was performed for relevant studies investigating the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity test was performed using Cochrane's Q and chi-squared tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.1).

RESULTS

The search for relevant literature in the five electronic databases yielded 1238 articles. Of the 1238 articles, only 15 were included. Meta-analysis of outcomes from five studies showed a survival rate of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.97, P < 0.001) after ≥3 years, while outcomes from 12 studies revealed a short-term patient survival rate of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96, P = 0.75). In contrast, long- and short-term graft survival rates were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, P < 0.001), respectively. Incidence rates of infectious, surgical, and medical complications were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.001), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.25, P < 0.001), and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66, P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Good long- and short-term patient outcomes and graft survival rates were observed after ABO-I kidney transplantation. Similarly, the safety of performing kidney transplantations from living donors with ABO-I blood groups was established by the results of the current meta-analysis. Therefore, ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantations should be encouraged to reduce the time recipients spend on waiting lists and supplement the existing paired-exchange donor program.

Cancer Risk Following HLA-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) require desensitization to facilitate transplantation, and this substantial upfront immunosuppression may result in serious complications, including cancer.

Methods

To characterize cancer risk in ILDKTr, we evaluated 858 ILDKTr and 12 239 compatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (CLDKTr) from a multicenter cohort with linkage to the US transplant registry and 33 cancer registries (1997-2016). Cancer incidence was compared using weighted Cox regression.

Results

Among ILDKTr, the median follow-up time was 6.7 y (maximum 16.1 y) for invasive cancers (ascertained via cancer registry linkage) and 5.0 y (maximum 16.1 y) for basal and squamous cell carcinomas (ascertained via the transplant registry and censored for transplant center loss to follow-up). Invasive cancers occurred in 53 ILDKTr (6.2%) and 811 CLDKTr (6.6%; weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.35). Basal and squamous cell carcinomas occurred in 41 ILDKTr (4.8%) and 737 CLDKTr (6.0%) (wHR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.69-1.40). Cancer risk did not vary according to donor-specific antibody strength, and in an exploratory analysis, was similar between CLDKTr and ILDKTr for most cancer types and according to cancer stage, except ILDKTr had a suggestively increased risk of colorectal cancer (wHR 3.27; 95% CI, 1.23-8.71); however, this elevation was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that the risk of cancer is not increased for ILDKTr compared with CLDKTr. The possible elevation in colorectal cancer risk is unexplained and might suggest a need for tailored screening or prevention.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Preconditioning Therapy in ABO-Incompatible Living Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation is now an established form of renal replacement therapy, but the efficacy and safety of the different types of preconditioning therapies are unclear. We aimed to synthesize the totality of the published evidence about the effects of any form of preconditioning therapies in living donor ABOi kidney transplantation on graft and patient outcomes.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Clinicaltrial.gov databases (inception through June 2015) to identify all studies that described the outcomes of adult living donor ABOi kidney transplantations using any form of preconditioning therapies. Two independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Data were summarized using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses. We assessed confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.

RESULTS

Eighty-three studies (54 case reports and case series, 25 cohort, 2 case-control, and 2 registry studies) involving 4810 ABOi transplant recipients were identified. Overall, confidence in the available evidence was low. During a mean follow-up time of 28 (standard deviation [SD], 26.6) months, the overall graft survival for recipients who received immunoadsorption or apheresis was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 88.2%-97.1%) and 88.0% (95% CI, 82.6%-91.8%), respectively. For those who received rituximab or underwent splenectomy, the overall graft survival was 94.5% (95% CI, 91.6%-96.5%) and 79.7% (95% CI, 72.9%-85.1%), respectively. Data on other longer-term outcomes, including malignancy, were sparse.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab or immunoadsorption appeared to be promising preconditioning strategies before ABOi kidney transplantation. However, the overall quality of evidence and the confidence in the observed treatment effects are low. The increased use of ABOi kidney transplantation needs to be matched with randomized trials of different types, dosing, and frequency of preconditioning therapies so that this scarce resource can be used most effectively and efficiently.

Current progress in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi KT) was introduced to expand the donor pool and minimize shortage of kidneys for transplantation. Because improved outcomes of ABOi KT were reported in Japan in the early 2000s, the number of ABOi KTs has been increasing worldwide. In addition, a better understanding of immune pathogenesis and subsequent aggressive immunosuppression has helped to make effective desensitization protocols. Current strategies of ABOi KT consist of pretransplant antibody removal using plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption to prevent hyperacute rejection and potent maintenance immunosuppression, such as tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, to inhibit antibody-mediated rejection. Recent outcomes of ABOi KT are comparable with ABO-compatible KT. However, there are still many problems to be resolved. Very high anti-ABO antibody producers are difficult to desensitize. In addition, ABOi KT is associated with an increased risk of infection and possibly malignancy due to aggressive immunosuppression. Optimization of desensitization and patient-tailored immunosuppression protocols are needed to achieve better outcomes of ABOi KT. This review provides an overview of the history, immune mechanism, immunosuppressive protocol, outcomes, current obstacles, and future perspectives in ABOi KT.

Outcome comparison of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with low-dose rituximab and ABO-compatible kidney transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The development of immunosuppressive techniques has helped overcome the ABO incompatibility barrier. However, the outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation remain a controversial issue with the advent of the anti-CD20 chimeric antibody rituximab. Herein, we report the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation with low-dose rituximab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2006 and April 2013, 42 patients underwent living-related kidney transplantation at our hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ABO-compatible (ABOc; n = 29) and ABOi kidney transplants using low-dose rituximab (100 mg/m(2)) without splenectomy (n = 13). The basic immunosuppression regimen (calcineurin inhibitor [CNI], mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], and steroids) was the same for both groups, except for the use of rituximab and therapeutic apheresis in the ABOi group. We compared post-transplantation renal function, incidents of virus infection, episodes of rejection, and graft survival between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In our hospital, 30% of recipients received ABOi kidney transplants. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) did not differ between the groups. Rejection episodes confirmed by biopsy in the ABOc and ABOi groups were 8 (28%) and 4 (31%) patients (P = .833), acute antibody-mediated rejection was observed in 1 (3.5%) and 2 (15%) patients (P = .165), and virus infection was observed in 14 (48%) and 3 (23%) patients (P = .252), respectively. The 5-year patient survival rate was 100% in both groups, and the 5-year graft survival rates were 95% for ABOc and 100% for ABOi transplants (P = .527).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation with low-dose rituximab are similar to those of ABOc kidney transplantation. Further study is necessary to address the efficacy and safety of ABOi kidney transplantation.

An update on ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is nowadays a well-established procedure to expand living donor transplantation to blood group incompatible donor/recipient constellations. In the last two decades, transplantation protocols evolved to more specific isohaemagglutinin elimination techniques and established competent antirejection protection protocols without the need of splenectomy. ABOi kidney transplantation associated accommodation despite isohaemagglutinin reappearance, C4d positivity of peritubular capillaries as well as the increased incidence of bleeding complications is currently under intense investigation. However, most recent data show excellent graft survival rates equivalent to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation outcome.

ABO incompatible renal transplants: Good or bad?

ABO incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) was previously considered to be an absolute contraindication for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) due to hyperacute rejection related to blood type barrier. Since the first successful series of ABOi-KT was reported, ABOi-KT is performed increasingly all over the world. ABOi-KT has led to an expanded donor pool and reduced the number of patients with ESKD awaiting deceased kidney transplantation (KT). Intensified immunosuppression and immunological understanding has helped to shape current desensitization protocols. Consequently, in recent years, ABOi-KT outcome is comparable to ABO compatible KT (ABOc-KT). However, many questions still remain unanswered. In ABOi-KT, there is an additional residual immunological risk that may lead to allograft damage, despite using current diverse but usually intensified immunosuppressive protocols at the expense of increasing risk of infection and possibly malignancy. Notably, in ABOi-KT, desensitization and antibody reduction therapies have increased the cost of KT. Reassuringly, there has been an evolution in ABOi-KT leading to a simplification of protocols over the last decade. This review provides an overview of the history, outcome, protocol, advantages and disadvantages in ABOi-KT, and focuses on whether ABOi-KT should be recommended as a therapeutic option of KT in the future.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A dramatic shortage of available organs around the world encouraged attempts to cross previously forbidden immunological boundaries in kidney transplantation. This review focuses on the recent results of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The outcome of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in terms of patient and graft survival is comparable to ABO-compatible transplantation for adult and pediatric recipients. Splenectomy has been replaced by the B-cell-depleting agent rituximab to avoid isoagglutinin titer rebound, prevent antibody-mediated rejection, and improve graft survival. However, the risk for infections may be increased and warrants caution. Corticosteroids remain a necessary component of any ABO-incompatible protocol; early as well as late steroid withdrawal may bear an enhanced risk for acute rejection and should only be performed with careful follow-up including protocol biopsies. The few studies that have long-term outcomes using protocol biopsies have characterized a state of accommodation by up-regulation of complement inhibitors, down-regulation of A/B antigens, and establishment of endothelial chimerism over time.

SUMMARY

The experience accumulated around the world indicates that ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is well tolerated and effective in adults and in children, and it represents an important step forward in expanding the living donor pool. Further understanding of ABO-incompatible graft accommodation may have broader implication also for human leukocyte antigen-sensitized allograft recipients.