Infected donors in renal transplantation: expanding the donor pool

Kidney Transplantation From Infected Donors With Particular Emphasis on Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Prevention of sepsis-related organ dysfunction in septic donors is crucial. In this study, septic donors were followed-up based on donor Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2014 and 2020 at our center, 29 primary kidney transplant recipients received organs from 20 septic donors. All donors received either pathogen-specific or broad-spectrum antibiotics at least 48 hours before procurement, and all recipients received similar treatment posttransplant for an average of 7 to 14 days. Donor eligibility was determined according to the sum of donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores obtained from 6 parameters: Pao2/Fio2 ratio; platelet count; serum bilirubin, creatinine, and lactate levels; and presence of hypotension. The cut-off value for bacteremic donor acceptance was below 12 points.

RESULTS

Fever (≥38 °C) persisted in 5 donors in the last 24 hours before organ removal. However, in these 5 donors, the mean donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 6.5 ± 1.1, mean arterial pressure was >70 mm Hg, and serum lactate levels were <2 mmol/L. Fifteen donors had systemic inflammatory response syndrome scores of ≤2 with corresponding donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores of 7.9 ± 1.2; none had systemic inflammatory response syndrome scores >3, which would have indicated severe organ failure. In 28 recipients (97%), no donor-related infections were observed in the perioperative first month and afterwards.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of donors and recipients with a common protocol greatly reduced the risk of donor-induced infection transmission. In addition, we found the donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria to be a helpful tool in predicting organ failure in infected donors.

Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors With Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The use of organs from donors with infection is limited because of the possibility of transmission. We aimed to investigate the transmission after deceased donor transplantation with bloodstream infection (BSI).

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients undergoing kidney or pancreas transplantation at five tertiary centers in Korea from January 2009 and November 2019 was performed. We analyzed the outcomes after transplantation from deceased donors with BSI.

RESULTS

Eighty-six recipients received transplantation from 69 donors with BSI. The most common isolated pathogens from donors were Gram-positive bacteria (72.0%), followed by Gram-negative bacteria (22.7%), and fungi (5.3%). Appropriate antimicrobial agents were used in 47.8% of donors before transplantation. Transmission occurred only in 1 of 83 recipients (1.2%) from bacteremic donors and 1 of 6 recipients (16.7%) from fungemic donors. One-year patient and graft survival was 97.5%and 96.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in graft and patient survival between patients who received organs from infected donors and noninfected donors.

CONCLUSION

Using organs from donors with bacteremia seems to be a safe option with low transmission risk. The overall prognosis of using organs from donors with BSI is favorable.

Brazilian guidelines for the management of brain-dead potential organ donors. The task force of the AMIB, ABTO, BRICNet, and the General Coordination of the National Transplant System

OBJECTIVE

To contribute to updating the recommendations for brain-dead potential organ donor management.

METHOD

A group of 27 experts, including intensivists, transplant coordinators, transplant surgeons, and epidemiologists, joined a task force formed by the General Coordination Office of the National Transplant System/Brazilian Ministry of Health (CGSNT-MS), the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine (AMIB), the Brazilian Association of Organ Transplantation (ABTO), and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet). The questions were developed within the scope of the 2011 Brazilian Guidelines for Management of Adult Potential Multiple-Organ Deceased Donors. The topics were divided into mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic support, endocrine-metabolic management, infection, body temperature, blood transfusion, and use of checklists. The outcomes considered for decision-making were cardiac arrest, number of organs recovered or transplanted per donor, and graft function/survival. Rapid systematic reviews were conducted, and the quality of evidence of the recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Two expert panels were held in November 2016 and February 2017 to classify the recommendations. A systematic review update was performed in June 2020, and the recommendations were reviewed through a Delphi process with the panelists between June and July 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 19 recommendations were drawn from the expert panel. Of these, 7 were classified as strong (lung-protective ventilation strategy, vasopressors and combining arginine vasopressin to control blood pressure, antidiuretic hormones to control polyuria, serum potassium and magnesium control, and antibiotic use), 11 as weak (alveolar recruitment maneuvers, low-dose dopamine, low-dose corticosteroids, thyroid hormones, glycemic and serum sodium control, nutritional support, body temperature control or hypothermia, red blood cell transfusion, and goal-directed protocols), and 1 was considered a good clinical practice (volemic expansion).

CONCLUSION

Despite the agreement among panel members on most recommendations, the grade of recommendation was mostly weak. The observed lack of robust evidence on the topic highlights the importance of the present guideline to improve the management of brain-dead potential organ donors.

Safe Use of Infected Donor Organs in Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Organ availability is limited in the face of the growing number of candidates. Using organs from individuals with an infection at the time of transplantation emerged as a possible but controversial solution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients submitted to kidney transplantation in Hospital Garcia de Orta (Almada, Portugal) from January 2008 to March 2019, comparing outcomes between recipients of organs from donors with an active infection and noninfected donors in the referred interval.

RESULTS

An active infection in the donor was identified in 55 cases (28.4%) from a total of 194 transplants. The most frequent site of infection was the lung (n = 30), followed by the urinary tract (n = 13); 9 donors (16.4%) had documented bacteremia. None of the identified microorganisms were multidrug-resistant. All recipients from an infected donor received adequate antibiotic prophylaxis (mean duration of 11.1 ± 3.0 days). No significant differences between groups were found regarding patients' demographics, cold ischemia time, duration of hospital stay, delayed graft function, rejection episodes, noninfectious complications, or patient and graft survival. Basiliximab was the preferred induction agent in both groups but was used in a larger proportion of recipients in the infected donor group (87.0% vs 60.6%; P = .001). The rate of infectious complications was significantly lower in the infected donor group (14.5% vs 42.4%; P = .001), and none of the previously isolated agents in the donor was found in the recipient.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplant using infected donors can be performed safely, without worse organ-specific or recipient outcomes, if certain conditions are considered.

Impact of donor with evidence of bacterial infections on deceased donor liver transplantation: a retrospective observational cohort study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

The shortage of available donor organs is an unsolvable concern leading to an expansion in the donor criteria for organ transplantation. Here, we describe our experience and assess the outcomes in recipients who obtained a graft from a donor with bacterial infections in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).

METHODS

All DDLTs between January 1991 and February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorised into two groups based on the recipients who obtained a graft from a donor with (group I) or without (group II) evidence of bacterial infections. Outcomes and bacterial infections were compared between the two groups of recipients.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 285 DDLTs were performed from 248 donors consisting of 48 split liver grafts and 208 whole liver grafts. Of those, 98 recipients (group I, 34.3%) were transplanted with a graft from 78 donors with positive bacterial cultures. Donor sputum cultures had the highest rate of positive bacterial growth, accounting for 26.6% of donors. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.9746). The OS rates at 1 and 3 years were 73.5% and 69.2%, respectively, in the group I recipients versus 68.8% and 62.4% in the group II recipients. Importantly, no hospital mortality was related to donor-derived bacterial infections.

CONCLUSION

Transmission of bacteria from the donor to the recipient is infrequent in DDLT. Therefore, potential donors with positive bacterial infections should not be excluded for organ transplantation to increase organ availability and ameliorate the organ shortage.

A Case Report: Organs From a Donor With Highly Virulent Zoonotic Outbreak Strain of Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype III, Multilocus Sequence Type 283 Infective Endocarditis Did Not Result in Transmission With Adequate Prophylactic Antibiotic Cover

In 2015, an outbreak involving a highly virulent zoonotic outbreak strain of Streptococcus agalactiae serotype III, multilocus sequence type 283 occurred in Singapore with increased neurologic complications, septic arthritis, and spinal infections in healthier patients. We report a case of a successful dual kidney transplant from a deceased donor with infective endocarditis and disseminated infection with the same strain of S agalactiae and we review the current literature.

Central nervous system syndromes in solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients have a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) complications, including both focal and diffuse neurologic deficits. In the immunocompromised host, the initial clinical evaluation must focus on both life-threatening CNS infections and vascular or anatomic lesions. The clinical signs and symptoms of CNS processes are modified by the immunosuppression required to prevent graft rejection. In this population, these etiologies often coexist with drug toxicities and metabolic abnormalities that complicate the development of a specific approach to clinical management. This review assesses the multiple risk factors for CNS processes in solid organ transplant recipients and establishes a timeline to assist in the evaluation and management of these complex patients.