Identifying Improved and Non-improved Aspects of Health-related Quality of Life After Liver Transplantation Based on the Assessment of the Specific Questionnaire Liver Disease Quality of Life

Quality of life, anxiety, and depression improve at one-year after liver transplantation in patients with advanced liver disease

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) improves survival in end-stage liver disease. Several reports have addressed the impact of LT on patients' lives, beyond purely medical outcomes. Although the quality of life and mental health have been demonstrated to improve with this procedure, such studies are still missing in Latin America.

Methods

Patients who received LT at the Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá between 2017 and 2019 were assessed for quality of life (QoL), anxiety, and depression and they were followed up for one year after the procedure. Pre-transplant data were gathered at inclusion on the waiting list, while post-transplant data at 3- and 12 months after LT. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) instruments were used to evaluate QoL. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used for evaluating anxious and depressive symptoms.

Results

115 recipients met the inclusion criteria. Mean pre-transplant EQ-VAS was 70.78, rising to 87.16 and 92.56 at 3- and 12-months, respectively. Improvements in all EQ-5D dimensions were found in response to LT. According to the HADS questionnaire, anxiety was reduced by 2.35 points and depression by 1.63 points after LT.

Conclusion

in the short term, LT is a successful strategy for enhancing QoL, anxiety, and depression in patients with liver disease. Long-term benefits must be assessed.

Impact of biliary complications on quality of life in live-donor liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advancements in liver transplantation (LT) surgical procedures and perioperative care, post-LT biliary complications (BCs) remain a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and graft failure. In addition, data are conflicting regarding the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of LT recipients. Thus, the success of LT should be considered in terms of both the survival and recovery of HRQoL.

AIM

To assess the impact of BCs on the HRQoL of live-donor LT recipients (LDLT-Rs).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data for 25 LDLT-Rs who developed BCs post-LT between January 2011 and December 2016 at our institution. The Short Form 12 version 2 (SF 12v2) health survey was used to assess their HRQoL. We also included 25 LDLT-Rs without any post-LT complications as a control group.

RESULTS

The scores for HRQoL of LDLT-Rs who developed BCs were significantly higher than the norm-based scores in the domains of physical functioning (P = 0.003), role-physical (P < 0.001), bodily pain (P = 0.003), general health (P = 0.004), social functioning (P = 0.005), role-emotional (P < 0.001), and mental health (P < 0.001). No significant difference between the two groups regarding vitality was detected (P = 1.000). The LDLT-Rs with BCs had significantly lower scores than LDLT-Rs without BCs in all HRQoL domains (P < 0.001) and the mental (P < 0.001) and physical (P = 0.0002) component summary scores.

CONCLUSION

The development of BCs in LDLT-Rs causes a lower range of improvement in HRQoL.

ASPECTOS PSICOSSOCIAIS DA QUALIDADE DE VIDA DE RECEPTORES DE TRANSPLANTE HEPÁTICO

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a dimensão psicossocial da qualidade de vida de pacientes antes e depois do transplante hepático. Método: estudo descritivo, transversal, com abordagem quantitativa, com 150 pacientes submetidos ao transplante de fígado em seguimento a partir do sexto mês, no ambulatório de um centro de referência em transplante hepático. A coleta de dados foi realizada a partir da aplicação de um instrumento com dados sociodemográficos/clínicos e do questionário Liver Disease Quality of Life. Foi utilizada análise estatística descritiva, teste t de Student para comparação das médias dos domínios e Games-Howell para comparações múltiplas. Resultados: houve melhoria nos níveis de qualidade de vida pós-transplante nos quatro domínios avaliados (<0,0001), com maior elevação de escores para os domínios: preocupação (55,5 vs 87,9) e estigma da doença hepática (58,6 vs 93,7). Conclusão: o estudo demonstrou que os pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático obtiveram uma melhoria significativa da percepção da qualidade de vida no que diz respeito à dimensão psicossocial, sendo mais perceptiva nos domínios preocupação e estigma da doença hepática.

Evaluation of health status in patients with hepatitis c treated with and without interferon

Background

The evolution of technology in healthcare has increased the health care’s costs and, the universal healthcare systems, in developed countries, need to ensure proper allocation of resources. Thus, the major issue is assessing the effectiveness of new medical technologies. The evaluation of quality of life in response to new treatments has become a key indicator in chronic conditions for which medical interventions are evaluated not only in terms of increasing the number of expected life years but also in terms of increasing quality of life. The aim of this observational study was to verify whether a simple instrument (EQ-5D-5 L) can capture variations in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and allow us to evaluate the impact of different drug treatment protocols in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) on daily activities.

Methods

Sixty six patients with HCV were consecutively enrolled in the Hepatology Unit at the University Hospital of Catania “G. Rodolico”. Sixteen patients received new direct-acting-antiviral agents (DAAs) plus pegylated alpha interferon (Peg-α-IFN) protocol (Group A) and 50 DAAs IFN free protocol (Group B).

The EQ-5D-5 L® questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) were given to both groups to calculate coefficient’s utility. We used the EQ-5D-5 L Crosswalk Index Value Calculator to obtain the utility EQIndex and both parametric and non parametric tests for the statistical analysis.

Results

The biopsy taken at the beginning of treatment showed comparable cell damage in both groups. The difference in the VAS results was negative for patients who received protocols containing IFN (indicating decreased quality of life),whereas it was positive in patients treated with IFN-free protocols. The baseline EQIndex did not reveal any differences between the two treatment groups. The post-treatment EQIndex was statistically better in the groups that received IFN-free therapy.

Conclusions

When innovative treatments are introduced into clinical practice, assessing quality of life is mandatory to determine their benefits. The instruments used in the present study are effective in detecting the areas in which improvement has occurred. These instruments can be easily managed by general practitioners for follow up of progression of the disease and referred to the specialist.