Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients Hospitalized at a Transplantation and Nephrology Ward: 1-Year Follow-up

The phenomenon of urinary tract infection experienced by women with a kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection is the most common infection among people with a kidney transplant and increases the risk of graft rejection. Women have a higher risk. A literature search did not identify any description of the phenomenon of urinary tract infection experienced by women with a kidney transplant.

OBJECTIVE

To examine how women with a kidney transplant experienced the phenomenon of a urinary tract infection.

DESIGN

A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach.

APPROACH

Eight individual semistructured interviews based on van Manen's four lifeworld existentials and analysed using systematic text condensation.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with a kidney transplant and recently been admitted to the hospital due to a urinary tract infection.

FINDINGS

We identified four themes: (1) Feeling both typical and atypical symptoms; (2) Becoming aware of the body and trying her best to prevent urinary tract infection; (3) Having a urinary tract infection is a dual experience, both good and bad; (4) Support from relatives.

CONCLUSION

The urinary tract infection symptoms pathway varied between participants but also between individual episodes of incidents among each participant. Participants felt secure when they experienced a common symptom pattern, but a new symptom pattern made them insecure. Together with their relatives, they experienced a urinary tract infection as a disruption of their everyday life and it decreased their experiences of happiness. They experienced to be supported by relatives but also by healthcare professionals, but needed more information on how to prevent, observe and react to a urinary tract infection in the future.

Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 10-Year Study

OBJECTIVES

Urinary tract infections are the main infectious complications among kidney transplant recipients and are considered as a potential risk factor for poor graft outcomes. However, the risk factors of urinary tract infections are controversial. The purpose of our study was to estimate the incidence and predisposing factors of urinary tract infections in patients undergoing kidney transplant in our teaching hospital of Sahloul, Tunisia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 141 consecutive adult kidney transplants that were performed at the Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Sahloul, Tunisia, between January 2007 and April 2016.

RESULTS

Of 141 patients, 72 (51.1%) had urinary tract infections after kidney transplant. Mean age was 32.54 ± 12.1 years; 47.6% were male patients, and 52.4% were female patients. The average time between transplant and early urinary tract infections was 11 days (range, 1-30 days). Among our patient group, 87.8% of urinary tract infections occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant. We collected 205 episodes of urinary tract infections: 66.3% were asymptomatic bacteriuria, 10.2% acute cystitis, and 23.4% pyelonephritis. The estimated risk factors for urinary tract infection included only female sex (P < .05); older age (P = .32), longer duration of catheter (P = .34), and high body mass index (P = .46) were not correlated with urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite preventive measures, urinary tract infections remain an important cause of morbidity among kidney transplant recipients. In fact, more than half of kidney transplant recipients had at least 1 urinary tract infection after surgery. Female sex was statistically associated with higher risk of urinary tract infection.

[Clinical and microbiological characteristics of urinary tract infections in the first year after renal transplantation]

Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most frequent infection in kidney transplant (KT) patients. The main objective was to determine the clinical and microbiological characteristics of UTIs that occur during the first year after KT.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study that included patients over 18 years of age who received KT between 2009-2020 in two hospitals in Córdoba city, Argentina. Patients were followed up during the first year after the transplant by recording them in the medical records, and those who presented at least one episode of UTI were analyzed.

Results

During the study period, 568 KTs were performed, of which 207 (36.4%) had at least one episode of UTI. In total, there were 419 UTI episodes, 6 (1.4%) polymicrobial UTI episodes, so a total of 426 microorganisms were identified in the urine cultures. Of the total number of episodes, 206 (49.2%) occurred between 31 and 180 days post-transplant. The main etiological agent was E. coli with 225 isolates (52.8%) followed by Klebsiella sp. with 94 (22.1%). 52.1% of all episodes were caused by multi-resistant microorganisms (MRM). Among the E. coli isolates, 94 (41.8%) were MRM. In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with UTI due to MRM were a history of recurrent UTI (Odds ratio 2.43; 95% CI: 1.37-4.30) and induction with basiliximab (Odds ratio 1.53; 95% CI: 1.029-2.29).

Main conclusion

UTIs occurred in more than a third of kidney transplant patients, being slightly more than half caused by MOR.

Classification of imbalanced data using machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of renal graft failures in Ethiopia

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease has raised the need for renal replacement therapy over recent decades. Even though a kidney transplant offers an improved quality of life and lower cost of care than dialysis, graft failure is possible after transplantation. Hence, this study aimed to predict the risk of graft failure among post-transplant recipients in Ethiopia using the selected machine learning prediction models.

METHODOLOGY

The data was extracted from the retrospective cohort of kidney transplant recipients at the Ethiopian National Kidney Transplantation Center from September 2015 to February 2022. In response to the imbalanced nature of the data, we performed hyperparameter tuning, probability threshold moving, tree-based ensemble learning, stacking ensemble learning, and probability calibrations to improve the prediction results. Merit-based selected probabilistic (logistic regression, naive Bayes, and artificial neural network) and tree-based ensemble (random forest, bagged tree, and stochastic gradient boosting) models were applied. Model comparison was performed in terms of discrimination and calibration performance. The best-performing model was then used to predict the risk of graft failure.

RESULTS

A total of 278 completed cases were analyzed, with 21 graft failures and 3 events per predictor. Of these, 74.8% are male, and 25.2% are female, with a median age of 37. From the comparison of models at the individual level, the bagged tree and random forest have top and equal discrimination performance (AUC-ROC = 0.84). In contrast, the random forest has the best calibration performance (brier score = 0.045). Under testing the individual model as a meta-learner for stacking ensemble learning, the result of stochastic gradient boosting as a meta-learner has the top discrimination (AUC-ROC = 0.88) and calibration (brier score = 0.048) performance. Regarding feature importance, chronic rejection, blood urea nitrogen, number of post-transplant admissions, phosphorus level, acute rejection, and urological complications are the top predictors of graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Bagging, boosting, and stacking, with probability calibration, are good choices for clinical risk predictions working on imbalanced data. The data-driven probability threshold is more beneficial than the natural threshold of 0.5 to improve the prediction result from imbalanced data. Integrating various techniques in a systematic framework is a smart strategy to improve prediction results from imbalanced data. It is recommended for clinical experts in kidney transplantation to use the final calibrated model as a decision support system to predict the risk of graft failure for individual patients.

Therapeutic Potential of Intravenous Phage as Standalone Therapy for Recurrent Drug-Resistant Urinary Tract Infections

Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) are common in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and are associated with multidrug resistance and increased morbidity/mortality. Novel antibiotic alternatives to reduce UTI recurrence are critically needed. We describe a case of rUTI due to extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) Klebsiella pneumoniae in a KTR that was treated successfully with 4 weeks of adjunctive intravenous bacteriophage therapy alone, without concomitant antibiotics, and with no recurrence in a year of follow-up.

Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Living Donor Renal Transplant Recipients and the Role of Behavioral Education Program in Management: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent type of kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We aimed to investigate the incidence, causes, and clinical impact of early recurrent UTI post-living donor KT and to examine the role of behavioral education program in management.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort chart-review study included all KT recipients with recurrent UTI necessitating hospital admission between September 2017 and August 2021. All patients with recurrent UTI were subjected to behavioral education for a month.

RESULTS

UTI was found in 14 of 145 patients (9.6%), with recurrent UTI in 11 (7.6%). A total of 93% of UTIs occurred during the first 6 months post-transplant and represented 52% of KT readmissions during the same period. A total of 64.3% of patients were older than 50 years. The mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 5 (2.5) days, with an equal incidence in both sexes. The most common bacterial isolates in early recurrent UTI were Escherichia coli in 80.9%. Both Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and multidrug-resistant organisms (resistance in ≥3 drugs) were seen in 82.4% of isolates. Furthermore, the most effective antibiotic was meropenem, with 86.7% effectiveness. A total of 65% of UTIs were managed with a single antibacterial course. A total of 64.3% of patients were older than 50 years. In patients who developed UTI, the mean (SD) serum creatinine was 1.31 (0.52) mg/dL, with a mean increase in serum creatinine of 0.19 mg/dL on having the episodes; at 1 year post-transplant, serum creatinine declined to 1.23 (0.43) mg/dL. Four patients (36%) had no recurrence of UTI after behavioral education.

CONCLUSIONS

The multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates account for 82.4% of the UTIs. Therefore, antibiotic prescription should follow the antimicrobial stewardship guidelines. Behavioral education significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent UTI.

Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent urinary tract infection in kidney transplant recipients

Background

Rapid and accurate pathogen diagnosis is an urgent unmet clinical need for recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) may offer another strategy for diagnosing uropathogens but remains to be studied.

Methods

Nineteen KTRs with RUTI were collected in this study. The uropathogens were detected and compared by mNGS and urine culture, respectively. Modifications of the anti-infection strategy were also assessed.

Results

Rich and diverse pathogens were revealed by mNGS. mNGS was significantly higher than culture in total positive rate (100.0% vs. 31.6%; p < 0.01) and in identification rates for bacteria (89.5% vs. 31.6%; p < 0.01), for viruses (57.9% vs. 0; p < 0.01), and for fungi (42.1% vs. 0; p < 0.01), respectively. mNGS identified a significantly higher proportion of mixed infections than culture (89.5% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.01). The anti-infection therapies were adjusted in two (33.3%) and 12 (76.9%) cases guided by culture and mNGS, respectively.

Conclusion

mNGS has more remarkable etiological diagnostic performance compared with urine culture for KTRs with RUTI to guide anti-infection strategies and, in turn, protect the graft.

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the First Year After Transplantation

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) needs replacement therapy and most often, kidney transplantation is the best therapeutic option. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most important complications after renal transplantation that affects transplantation outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to define the incidence rate, UTI risk factors among kidney transplant recipients, and causative organism of UTI and their antibiotic susceptibility. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we collected clinical, demographic, and laboratory data from 268 transplant recipients in Ali-Asghar Hospital from 2011 - 2018. Data collected from patients were analyzed with SPSS software version 25. Results: According to the results, 50 (18.7%) had UTI in the first year after renal transplantation. Female gender and underlying cause of renal failure were predisposing factors for UTI. The most common causative organism was Escherichia coli (58.4%). The antibiotic susceptibility results showed nitrofurantoin and meropenem as the most effective antibiotics for Escherichia coli. Conclusions: The UTI was more common in women and patients with analgesic nephropathy and lupus nephritis. The most common causative organism was E. coli and meropenem and nitrofurantoin were the most effective drug choices.

Urinary Tract Infections Caused by K. pneumoniae in Kidney Transplant Recipients – Epidemiology, Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance

Urinary tract infections are the most common complication in kidney transplant recipients, possibly resulting in the deterioration of a long-term kidney allograft function and an increased risk of recipient’s death. K. pneumoniae has emerged as one of the most prevalent etiologic agents in the context of recurrent urinary tract infections, especially with multidrug resistant strains. This paper discusses the epidemiology and risk factors associated with urinary tract infections in kidney transplant recipients, multi-drug resistance of K. pneumoniae (ESBL, KPC, NDM), treatment and pathogenesis of K. pneumoniae infections, and possible causes of recurrent UTIs. It also addresses the issue of colonization/becoming a carrier of K. pneumoniae in the gastrointestinal tract and asymptomatic bacteriuria in relation to a symptomatic UTI development and epidemiology.

Incidence and risk factors for urinary tract infections in the first year after renal transplantation

Background

The most common infections among renal transplant patients are urinary tract infections (UTI). Our main objective in this study is to determine the incidence of UTIs in patients who have undergone renal transplantation in our hospital, to identify the causative microbiological agents, risk factors and determine the effects of UTI on short-term graft survival.

Methods

Urinary tract infections, which developed within the first year of renal transplantation, were investigated. Patients were compared regarding demographic, clinical, laboratory characteristics and graft survival.

Results

102 patients were included in our study. Fifty-three patients (53%) were male and 49 (48%) were female. Sixty-seven urinary tract infection attacks in 21 patients (20.5%) were recorded. Age (p = 0.004; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.032–1.184), longer indwelling urinary catheter stay time (p = 0.039; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.013–1.661) and urologic complications (p = 0.006; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.001–0.320) were found as risk factors for UTI development in the first year of transplantation. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. Of these bacteria, 63.2% were found to be extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) positive. Multidrug resistant microorganisms (MDROs) were more frequent in male patients (32 episodes in males vs. 14 episodes in females, p = <0.001). UTI had no negative impact on short-term graft survival.

Conclusion

Our study results represent the high incidence of UTI with MDROs in KT recipients. Infection control methods should be applied even more vigorously especially in male transplant patients since a higher incidence of UTI caused by resistant microorganisms was reported in male patients.

Incidence and Causes of Late Hospital Readmissions After Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Our primary aim was to find the incidence, causes, and factors responsible for late hospital readmissions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 185 patients included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with late readmission after discharge and those with no late readmission. Inpatient records and charts were assessed for the medical status of the patients, cause of chronic kidney disease, comorbidities, vintage and modality of dialysis, and hospital admissions 3 months before transplant. Collected patient data included recipient age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, hepatitis C status, donor age, methods of immunosuppression and induction, duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications and secondary procedures, number, duration, and causes of hospital readmission after transplant, and methods of evaluation and management during readmission.

RESULTS

There were 80 patients who received 127 late hospital readmissions. The most common cause of late hospital readmission was infection, which led to 45 admissions (35.43%). Of 45 admissions for infections, 18 were caused by urinary tract infections. Other reasons for admission were pneumonia (10 admissions), cytomegalovirus infection (11 admissions), and tuberculosis (6 admissions). The second most common cause of readmission was infectious or noninfectious diarrhea, which led to 29 admissions (22.88%). There were 28 late hospital readmissions (22.4%) for the evaluation or management of graft dysfunction. Newonset diabetes after transplant and febrile illness were causes of late hospital readmission in 8 cases each (6.9%), with 9 late hospital readmissions (7.08%) the result of other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of late hospital readmission is high (43.2%), and the most common cause is infection, particularly urinary tract infections. Age of the recipient and early hospital readmission are predictive factors for late hospital readmission.

Overview on urinary tract infection, bacterial agents, and antibiotic resistance pattern in renal transplant recipients

Background:

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a mainly common infection in kidney transplant recipients. This study decided to investigate UTI, bacterial agents, and antibiotic resistance pattern in kidney transplant recipients from Iran.

Materials and Methods:

Search process was conducted for UTI, bacterial agents, and antibiotic resistance pattern in kidney transplant recipients from Iran via electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, etc.,) with Mesh terms in either Persian and English languages without limited time to May 31, 2020. Data were analyzed by comprehensive meta-analysis software.

Results:

The combined prevalence of UTI in renal transplant recipients was reported by 31.1%. The combined prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria was 69%. The most common pathogens among Gram negatives were E. coli followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae with frequency 43.4% and 13%, respectively. Subgroup analysis for Gram-positive bacteria showed the combined prevalence of 31%. The most common microorganism among Gram positives belonged to coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Enterococci with a prevalence of 10.2% and 9%, respectively. Subgroup meta-analysis of antibiotic resistance for Gram-negative showed the most resistance to cephalexin followed by carbenicillin with a prevalence of 89.1% and 87.3%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Our review showed a noticeable rate of UTI (31.1%) among renal transplant recipients in Iran and a high prevalence of Gram-negative (69%) and Gram-positive (13%) microorganisms. A high resistance rate was seen against almost all antibiotics used for the treatment of UTI. Therefore, empirical prescription of antibiotics should be avoided, and it should be based on data obtained from antibiogram tests.

Analysis of Susceptibility to Selected Antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients over 8 Years: Single-Center Study

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common bacterial infections among kidney transplant (KTX) recipients. The purpose of this study was to analyze antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in four most common pathogens responsible for UTIs in KTX recipients and determine risk factors (RF) for resistance in the same group. Methods: Analyzed antibiograms were based on urine samples positive for bacterial growth of 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL obtained from hospitalized adult KTX recipients presenting with UTI symptoms upon admission to the center in years 2011–2018. Results: In total, 783 antibiograms were analyzed for Klebsiella pneumoniae (258 samples, 33.0%), Escherichia coli (212, 27.0%), Enterococcus faecalis (128, 24.0%), and Enterococcus faecium (125, 16.0%). The decrease in susceptibility of E. coli to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (62.9% vs. 40.0%) and ciprofloxacin (100% to 40.0%) was observed. Susceptibility to gentamicin increased from 33.3% to 92.9% in E. faecium. Susceptibility to tigecycline remained 100% through all years in case of E. faecalis and E. faecium. Male gender was a RF for resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (p = 0.008), ciprofloxacin (p = 0.0003), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (p = 0.00009), ceftriaxone (p = 0.0001), and cefuroxime axetil (p = 0.00038) in K. pneumoniae and against gentamicin in E. faecalis (p = 0.015). Higher resistance to ampicillin in E. faecalis (p = 0.012) and to ciprofloxacin (p = 0.0003), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (p = 0.007), piperacillin/tazobactam (p = 0.003), ceftriaxone (p = 0.001), and cefuroxime axetil (p = 0.013) in K. pneumoniae was observed in higher age groups of patients. Diabetes as a cause of kidney insufficiency (p = 0.026) and kidney-pancreas transplantation (p = 0.014) was RF for resistance to ceftriaxone in K. pneumoniae. Conclusions: AMR in uropathogens from KTX recipients fluctuated. There were identifiable RFs for resistance in the examined bacteria–antibiotic combinations. We recommend continuous mapping of site-specific microorganisms as etiology and susceptibility may vary between institutions and over time.

Five compelling UTI questions after kidney transplant

PURPOSE

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection among infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). After transplantation, infections can result from surgical complications, donor-derived infections, pre-existing recipient infections, and nosocomial infections. Post-transplant infection is still a major cause of morbidity, mortality, graft dysfunction and rejection. In this paper, we aimed to review a few compelling questions in kidney transplantation (KTX).

METHODS

To identify relevant clinical questions regarding KTX and UTI a meeting was conducted among physicians involved in the KT program in our hospital. After discussion, several clinically relevant questions related to UTI after KTX. The 5 first rated in importance were judged generalizable to other clinical settings and selected for the purposes of this review.

RESULTS

Nearly half of the patients present in the first three months of transplant with UTI. The most common uropathogens in post-transplant UTIs are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. Risk factors for UTI include female sex, advanced age, recurrent UTI before transplant, prolonged urethral catheterization, delayed graft function, and cadaveric kidney transplant.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of post-transplant UTI is similar in both developed and developing countries. E.coli is the most common pathogen in most of studies. Cadaveric donor and post-dialysis transplantation are defined as independent risk factors for post-transplant UTI. Further studies are still required to identify risk factors after kidney transplantation and UTI's importance for graft function and patient outcome.

Preventing sepsis development in complicated urinary tract infections

Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent infections in the community and the most common reason for antimicrobial prescribing in ambulatory care. A UTI is defined as complicated when urinary tract anatomical abnormalities or urinary devices are present, when it is recurrent and when associated with immunodeficiency. Complicated UTIs (cUTIs) have a higher risk of treatment failure and often require longer antimicrobial treatment courses. cUTIs, especially those which are healthcare-associated, are often due to multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs).Areas covered: This article will review the available evidence in relation to prevention of sepsis in cUTI, evaluating the risk factors associated with sepsis development. Published articles from January 2005 to September 2019 on UTIs and sepsis prevention in complicated UTIs were identified by using MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine Bethesda MD) and by reviewing the references of retrieved articles.Expert opinion: Prevention of sepsis relies on prompt and timely diagnosis of cUTI, early identification of the causative organism, removal of obstructions and source control, proper and adequate empirical/targeted antimicrobial treatment. In particular, source control, i.e. removal of urinary obstructions, infected stents, urinary catheters, nephrostomies, and drainage of hydronephrosis/abscess, is essential for preventing the development and progression of sepsis.

Bacterial urinary tract infection among adult renal transplant recipients at St. Paul's hospital millennium medical college, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression protocols, follow up periods and antimicrobial stewardship in modern medicine; post-renal transplantation urinary tract infection remained a major public health problem globally. This multiple serious squeals includes asymptomatic bacteriuria, cystitis and pyelonephritis. Among these, the bacterial origin of infection complications accounts for the most significant clinical, socio-economic impacts in many countries of the world. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of bacterial isolates that cause urinary tract infections, assess antibiotic susceptibility pattern among symptomatic and asymptomatic renal transplant recipients attending at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

METHODS

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2017 to August 2018 among 74 renal transplant recipients St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A first morning voided clean-catch mid-stream urine specimens were collected and 0.001 ml inoculated onto blood and MacConkey agar plates following the standard bacteriological protocols. It was incubated aerobically at 35-37 °C for 24-48 h. Cultural characteristics and series of biochemical tests were used for the identification of isolates to species level based on the standard bacteriological protocols.

RESULTS

A hospital-based cross-sectional study has shown that significant bacteriuria was found in 11/74 (14.9, 95% CI =8.2-24.7) patients. The prevalence among females 6/32 (18.75%) was higher among males 5/42 (11.9%) without significant association (COR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.04-8.45, P = 0.253). Urinary tract infection was higher in the age group of 35-49 years old (19.3%). Age was statistically significant and stronger independent associated risk factor with crude odds ratio = 3.67, 95% CI = 2.89-20.07 and P = 0.003, respectively. The most prevalent bacteria isolates were Escherichia coli 2(18.2%), Staphylococcus aureus 2(18.2%), Acinetobacter spp. 2(18.2%), Enterococcus spp. 2(18.2%), Coagulase-negative Staphylococci 2(18.2%) followed by Porteus mirabilis 1(9.1%). The majority (80%) of Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Simultaneously, the multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates accounts for 82% among tested kidney allograft recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the overall prevalence of urinary tract infection in the study participants was relatively low with a prevalence of 14.9%. Majority of the study participants were asymptomatic and a higher percentage of females were involved. The multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates in the present study account for 82%.

Urinary tract infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of urinary tract infections (UTI) in solid organ transplantation, focusing on kidney transplant (KT) recipients. KT recipients have unique risk factors for UTI, including indwelling stents and surgical manipulation of the genitourinary tract. KT recipients experience multi-drug antibiotic-resistant infections-UTI prevention and management strategies must consider risks of antimicrobial resistance. Non-antimicrobial prevention strategies for UTI in KT recipients are reviewed. It is important to recognize that some renal transplant recipients with UTI may primarily present with fever, malaise, leukocytosis, or a non-specific sepsis syndrome without symptoms localized to the urinary tract. However, asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) must be distinguished from UTI because AB is not necessarily a disease state. Accumulating data indicate that there are no benefits of antibiotics for treatment of AB in KT recipients more than 2 months after post-transplant. Further research is needed on management of AB in the early (<2 months) post-transplant period, prophylaxis for UTI in this era of antibiotic resistance, recurrent UTI, non-antimicrobial prevention of UTI, and uropathogens identified in donor urine and/or preservative fluid cultures.

Does early removal of double J stents reduce urinary infection in living donor renal transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic use of double J (DJ) stents in recipients is highly accepted in renal transplantation. In this study, the association between the frequency of urologic complications (UC) and urinary tract infections (UTI), and the early or late removal of DJ stents was investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 116 live-donor renal transplant patients were included in the study during a 4-year period, with a mean follow-up of 29.2 ±15.3 months. In all, DJ stents were used. All patients were clinically monitored for graft function by assessment of the complete blood count, renal biochemistry, urine analysis and blood drug level according to our follow-up protocol.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time of their stent removal: group I (n = 44), removal within the first 14 days; and group II (n = 72), removal after 14 days. No urinary leaks were detected in either of the groups. Three patients suffered from anastomotic stricture (group I, n = 1; group II, n = 2). The rates of UTI were similar in groups I and II (13.6% vs. 16.6%, respectively, p = 0.79). The rate of UTI in women was found to be 3.8 times higher than in men.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study demonstrated that DJ stent removal within 14 days did not reduce the risk of UTI when compared to stent removal after 14 days. Similar effects on complication rates for ureteral stenting for these 2 removal periods were observed.

Evaluation of early and late-term infections after renal transplantation: Clinical experiences of Sanko University Medical Faculty Transplantation Center

OBJECTIVE

Infections play an important part in post-transplantation causes of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to evaluate short-, and long-term infections encountered in after renal transplantations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred and thirteen cases that consisted of both living and cadaver donors, who suffered from late period renal insufficiency and had renal transplant between June 2011 and January 2016 at the Transplantation Center of Sanko University School of Medicine were included in the study. In this study the short-, and long-term infections seen in post renal transplantation were examined retrospectively. Infection types, frequency and periods of infection, infection agents and predisposing factors were determined as the examination parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 213 patients who received renal transplant, 139 were males (65.3%) and 74 were women (34.75%) and the mean age was 42±11,8 (range, 14-70) years. Twelve (5.6%) patients exited after renal transplantation. Post-transplant infections were seen in 49 patients (23.1%) within 1-6 months; in 13 patients (6.1%) within 6-12 months; and in 5 patients (2.4%) after the 12^th month. The most common infections after renal transplantation were associated with urinary tract (70 patients, 34.3%). The most frequently isolated agents were E. coli (n=66; 30.9%), Kebsiella spp. (n=18; 8.4%) and Enterococci (n=18; 8.4%) respectively. The renal transplants from the cadavers were observed to contract infections 1.78 times more frequently compared to the living donors (OR=1.78, 95% CI=1.03-3.09).

CONCLUSION

The most common complication after renal transplantation are infections. The majority of the infections are seen within the first year especially between 1-6 months. Post-transplant infections are often related to urinary system. E.coli is the most frequently isolated agent and it may be responsible for urosepsis in renal transplant patients. Infection more often seen in renal transplantations from cadavers.

Epidemiology, susceptibility, and risk factors for acquisition of MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria among kidney transplant recipients with urinary tract infections

Background

Multiple drug resistant/extensively drug resistant (MDR/XDR) Gram-negative urinary tract infections (UTIs) represent a growing threat to kidney transplant recipients. This retrospective study aimed to assess the incidence and microbiological profile of MDR/XDR Gram-negative UTIs, to identify drug susceptibility of MDR/XDR bacteria, and to determine the potential risk factors for MDR/XDR UTIs in kidney recipients.

Materials and methods

During the study period, 1569 patients underwent consecutive kidney transplantation in two transplantation centers. We studied the demographics, clinical characteristics, and urine culture data from kidney recipients with MDR/XDR Gram-negative UTIs, and verified the risk factors associated with MDR/XDR infections.

Results

Eighty-one kidney recipients yielded 88 episodes of MDR/XDR Gram-negative UTIs with five patients (6.2%) succumbing to all-cause in-hospital mortality. The most frequently isolated bacterium was Escherichia coli (62.5%). Almost all MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to first- and second-generation cephalosporin, and monocyclic beta-lactam. They were relatively sensitive to meropenem, amikacin, and tigecycline. As for the 12 XDR bacteria, all of them were resistant to meropenem and 25% of them were resistant to tigecycline. All XDR Acinetobacter baumannii and E. coli were susceptible to tigecycline. Nosocomial infection (odds ratio [OR] = 11.429, 95% CI = 1.311–99.625, P = 0.027) was the only independent predictor of MDR/XDR Gram-negative UTIs. Non-fermenting bacterial infection (OR = 20.161, 95% CI = 3.409–119.240, P = 0.001), polycystic kidney disease (OR = 39.871, 95% CI = 1.979–803.384, P = 0.016), and serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL (OR = 8.688, 95% CI = 1.354–55.747, P = 0.023) were significantly different between XDR and MDR Gram-negative UTIs.

Conclusion

Meropenem, amikacin, and/or tigecycline can be prescribed for MDR/XDR Gram-negative infections. Tigecycline can also be prescribed for XDR A. baumannii and E. coli. Nosocomial infection was a risk factor for MDR/XDR Gram-negative UTIs, while XDR UTIs were associated with non-fermenting bacterial infection, polycystic kidney disease, and impaired renal function.

Value of perioperative genitourinary screening culture and colonization status in predicting early urinary tract infection after renal transplantation

Background

We aimed to assess whether patients colonized with certain organisms in the genitourinary tract would have greater urinary tract infection (UTI) risk during the post-transplantation period, and whether information on the perioperatively colonized organisms may help identify the causal organisms during early UTI.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the culture results of preoperative urine, preoperative urethral swab, and postoperative urinary catheter tip specimens of 420 renal transplant recipients. The colonization status was compared to the culture results during the first UTI episode within 6 months after transplantation.

Results

Twenty six (6.2%) patients developed early UTI, and the presence of common uropathogens in the perioperative genitourinary specimen was positively associated with a higher early UTI risk odds ratio [OR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44 to 7.24; P = 0.003). However, the actual causal organism during UTI was observed perioperatively only in 15 patients (40.5%). Neither perioperative colonization nor early UTI was associated with subsequent acute cellular rejection or graft failure.

Conclusions

Renal transplantation patients who were colonized with common uropathogens were more likely to develop early UTI. However, the usefulness of the culture results of perioperative colonizers in predicting the causal organism during early UTI seems limited due to the low concordance rate.

The challenge of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients. These infections are quite common, and the goal of care is to identify and reduce risk factors while providing effective prophylaxis and treatment. Better understanding of long-term outcomes from these infections has led to the distinctions among UTI, recurrent UTI, and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), and that each requires a different therapeutic approach. Specifically, new research has supported the perspective that asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be treated. Symptomatic UTI, on the other hand, requires intervention and remains an ongoing challenge for infectious disease clinicians. Many bacteria species are responsible for UTI in renal transplant patients, and in recent years there has been a global rise in infection caused by bacteria with newly acquired antibacterial resistance genes. Many renal transplant patients who experience UTI will also have multiple recurring episodes, which likely has a distinct pathophysiological mechanism leading to chronic colonization of the urinary tract. In these cases, long-term management includes bacterial suppression, which aims to reduce rather than eliminate bacteria to levels below the threshold for symptomatic infection. This review will address the current understanding of UTI epidemiology, pathogenesis, and risk factors in the renal transplant community, and also focus on current prevention and treatment strategies for patients who face an environment of increasingly antibiotic-resistant bacteria.