Impact of tissue-agnostic approvals for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies

Preclinical application of a CD155 targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for digestive system cancers

Despite intensive multimodal therapy, the prognosis for patients with digestive system cancers remains poor. Cancer cell heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironments are the main barriers to the effective CAR-T cell therapy with solid malignancies. In parallel, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are essential for tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment formation. The limited efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy with solid malignancies prompted us to test whether new therapeutic target could enhance the antitumor activity of CAR-T cells with several digestive system cancer types. We determined CD155 expression in multiple human digestive system cancers, including gastric cancer, esophagus cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colon cancer, normal tissue samples and patient-derived M2-like tumor-associated macrophages. We developed a CD155-based CAR comprising the extracellular domain of human TIGIT, 4-1BB, and CD3z signaling domains (BBz). Furthermore, we validated the killing efficacy and safety of CD155-BBz CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo using in-house established preclinical tumor models. CD155 was strongly and homogenously expressed in digestive system cancers but mildly in normal tissues, indicating it could be an ideal target for CAR-T cell therapy, moreover, TAMs that express CD155 possess an immunosuppressive M2-like profile. We found that CD155-BBz CAR-T cells can mediate significant antitumor activity in vivo, which induces complete tumor regression and long-lasting immunologic memory of established solid tumors in xenograft models. Our study indicates that CD155 is a promising target for digestive system cancer therapy, and CD155-targeting CAR-T cells perform a detecting power in digestive system cancer clinical trials.

Entrectinib can induce nerve cell damage by inhibiting PI3K-AKT and TGF-β signaling pathways

Background

The tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitor (TRKi) entrectinib is used to treat neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive solid tumors and ROS1-positive patients. Despite its impressive efficacy against cancer, the clinical application is still limited by the central nervous system (CNS)-related toxicities. However, the precise mechanism of such CNS-related toxicities remains elusive.

Methods

The effect of entrectinib-induced nerve cell damage was evaluated by the nerve cells (PC12, HT22 and SK-N-SH) based in vitro models. Various assays, including CCK-8, colony formation and EdU incorporation assays were utilized to estimate the cellular viability and proliferation ability. Cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. Next, transcriptome sequencing technology was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene ontology (GO), kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were applied to predict the potential functions of DEGs. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting assays were performed to measure the expressions of thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), TGF-β1, PI3K, AKT and phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) in the entrectinib-treated nerve cells. Additionally, we Preliminary observed and validated whether THBS1 overexpression could rescue nerve cell damage and the abnormalities in PI3K-AKT and TGF-β signaling pathways.

Results

Entrectinib significantly inhibited the nerve cells proliferation and colony formation, and induced nerve cells apoptosis. Transcriptome sequencing analysis and qRT-PCR revealed that THBS1 was downregulated within entrectinib treatment. KEGG and GSEA analysis also suggested that entrectinib directly caused the abnormalities in proliferation-related signaling pathway like PI3K-AKT pathway, and apoptosis-related signaling pathway including TGF-β pathway. We further demonstrated that THBS1, TGF-β1, PI3K, AKT and p-AKT were downregulated by entrectinib. Meanwhile, pretreatment with THBS1 overexpression plasmids significantly rescued nerve cells (PC12, HT22 and SK-N-SH) from cell death and the abnormalities in PI3K-AKT and TGF-β signaling pathways.

Conclusion

These results identified a critical role of entrectinib in promoting nerve cell damage by downregulating the expression of THBS1 while also inhibiting PI3K-AKT and TGF-β signaling pathways. Our findings will provide potential therapeutic targets for CNS-related toxicities.

Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of FGFR Gene-Altered Solid Tumors

The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is a crucial receptor tyrosine kinase involved in essential biological processes, including growth, development, and tissue repair. However, FGFR gene mutations, including amplification, fusion, and mutation, can disrupt epigenetics, transcriptional regulation, and tumor microenvironment interactions, leading to cancer development. Targeting these kinase mutations with small molecule drugs or antibodies has shown clinical benefits. For example, erdafitinib is approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer patients with FGFR2/FGFR3 mutations, and pemigatinib is approved for treating cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement. Effective screening of FGFR variant patients is crucial for the clinical application of FGFR inhibitors. Various detection methods, such as polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry, are available, and their selection should be based on diagnostic and treatment decision-making needs. Our developed expert consensus aims to standardize the diagnosis and treatment process for FGFR gene mutations and facilitate the practical application of FGFR inhibitors in clinical practice.

Exploring ALK fusion in colorectal cancer: a case series and comprehensive analysis

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive colorectal cancer (CRC) is a rare and chemotherapy-refractory subtype that lacks established and effective treatment strategies. Additionally, the efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors (ALKi) in CRC remain undetermined. Herein, we examined a series of ALK-positive CRC patients who underwent various lines of ALKi treatment. Notably, we detected an ALK 1196M resistance mutation in a CRC patient who received multiple lines of chemotherapy and ALKi treatment. Importantly, we found that Brigatinib and Lorlatinib demonstrated some efficacy in managing this patient, although the observed effectiveness was not as pronounced as in non-small cell lung cancer cases. Furthermore, based on our preliminary analyses, we surmise that ALK-positive CRC patients are likely to exhibit inner resistance to Cetuximab. Taken together, our findings have important implications for the treatment of ALK-positive CRC patients.

Pancreatic cancer biomarkers: A pathway to advance in personalized treatment selection

Pancreatic cancer is one of the tumors with the worst prognosis, and unlike other cancers, few advances have been made in recent years. The only curative option is surgery, but only 15-20% of patients are candidates, with a high risk of relapse. In advanced pancreatic cancer there are few first-line treatment options and no validated biomarkers for better treatment selection. The development of targeted therapies in pancreatic cancer is increasingly feasible due to tumor-agnostic treatments, such as PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 alterations or immunotherapies in patients with high microsatellite instability/tumor mutational burden. In addition, other therapeutic molecules have been developed for patients with KRAS G12C mutation or fusions in NTRK or NRG1. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in biomarkers that may help guide targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer. Therefore, this review aims to offer an updated perspective on biomarkers with therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer.

BRAF - a tumour-agnostic drug target with lineage-specific dependencies

In June 2022, the FDA granted Accelerated Approval to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib for the treatment of adult and paediatric patients (≥6 years of age) with unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600E-mutant solid tumours, except for BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancers. The histology-agnostic approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib marks the culmination of two decades of research into the landscape of BRAF mutations in human cancers, the biochemical mechanisms underlying BRAF-mediated tumorigenesis, and the clinical development of selective RAF and MEK inhibitors. Although the majority of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant tumours derive clinical benefit from BRAF inhibitor-based combinations, resistance to treatment develops in most. In this Review, we describe the biochemical basis for oncogenic BRAF-induced activation of MAPK signalling and pan-cancer and lineage-specific mechanisms of intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors. We also discuss novel RAF inhibitors and drug combinations designed to delay the emergence of treatment resistance and/or expand the population of patients with BRAF-mutant cancers who benefit from molecularly targeted therapies.

Treatment Options in Late-Line Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from Recent Randomized Studies

Systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably over the past 20 years. First- and second-line combinations of 5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without anti-angiogenic and/or anti-EGFR antibodies, were approved shortly after the turn of the millennium. Further triumphs were not seen for almost 10 years, until the approval of initially regorafenib and shortly after trifluridine/tipiracil. A growing understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling has led to further treatment options. Here, we review the most recent clinical data for late-line treatment options in mCRC, focusing on randomized trials if available. We include recommendations for options in unselected patients and therapies that should only be offered in patients with distinct tumor profiles (e.g., BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, deficient MMR, or NTRK gene fusions).

The significance of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in solid tumors: the more the merrier?

INTRODUCTION

To date, several emerging biomarkers have gained considerable interest in the field of predictive molecular oncology. The advent of precision medicine has led to the development of innovative drugs targeting rare molecular pathways independently from histology, defined as tissue-agnostic drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Although there is a lot of promise for this new tissue-agnostic model in the oncological scenario, crucial issues from both the diagnostic and therapeutic standpoint are emerging. This review aims to critically examine the role of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in different solid tumors, focusing on the prevalence and methods of detection of agnostic biomarkers together with drug approvals to guide clinicians in this evolving landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

To strengthen the framework for tissue-agnostic approvals, the dialogue between regulatory, industrial, and academic parties should be intensified. Critical questions include the development of an efficient network system that can overcome the heterogeneity of patients' inclusion criteria along with the increasingly difficult interpretation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling technologies. Cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit studies are needed in the national context considering the modalities of access to diagnostic tests and reimbursement of treatments.