2
|
Li JH, Xu X, Wang YF, Xie HY, Chen JY, Dong NG, Badiwala M, Xin LM, Ribeiro RVP, Yin H, Zhang H, Zhang JZ, Huo F, Yang JY, Yang HJ, Pan H, Li SG, Qiao YB, Luo J, Li HY, Jia JJ, Yu H, Liang H, Yang SJ, Wang H, Liu ZY, Zhang LC, Hu XY, Wu H, Hu YQ, Tang PF, Ye QF, Zheng SS. Chinese expert consensus on organ protection of transplantation (2022 edition). Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:516-526. [PMID: 36376226 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Hui Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Liver Transplantation, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Zhejiang Shuren University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310022, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Yan-Feng Wang
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430062, China
| | - Hai-Yang Xie
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jing-Yu Chen
- Wuxi Lung Transplantation Center, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, China
| | - Nian-Guo Dong
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Mitesh Badiwala
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Li-Ming Xin
- School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
| | | | - Hao Yin
- Organ Transplant Center, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Jian-Zheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Feng Huo
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou 510040, China
| | - Jia-Yin Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hong-Ji Yang
- Organ Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Hui Pan
- Department of Lung Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shao-Guang Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Yin-Biao Qiao
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jia Luo
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao-Yu Li
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jun-Jun Jia
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao Yu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Han Liang
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430062, China
| | - Si-Jia Yang
- Department of Lung Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Zhong-Yang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Li-Cheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Hu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yi-Qing Hu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Pei-Fu Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Qi-Fa Ye
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430062, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Liver Transplantation, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Zhejiang Shuren University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310022, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doppenberg JB, Leemkuil M, Engelse MA, Krikke C, de Koning EJP, Leuvenink HGD. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion of the human pancreas for clinical islet isolation: a prospective feasibility study. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1397-1407. [PMID: 34036616 PMCID: PMC8456912 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Due to an increasing scarcity of pancreases with optimal donor characteristics, islet isolation centers utilize pancreases from extended criteria donors, such as from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, which are particularly susceptible to prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT). We hypothesized that hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) can safely increase CIT. Five human DCD pancreases were subjected to 6 h of oxygenated HMP. Perfusion parameters, apoptosis, and edema were measured prior to islet isolation. Five human DBD pancreases were evaluated after static cold storage (SCS). Islet viability, and in vitro and in vivo functionality in diabetic mice were analyzed. Islets were isolated from HMP pancreases after 13.4 h [12.9–14.5] CIT and after 9.2 h [6.5–12.5] CIT from SCS pancreases. Histological analysis of the pancreatic tissue showed that HMP did not induce edema nor apoptosis. Islets maintained >90% viable during culture, and an appropriate in vitro and in vivo function in mice was demonstrated after HMP. The current study design does not permit to demonstrate that oxygenated HMP allows for cold ischemia extension; however, the successful isolation of functional islets from discarded human DCD pancreases after performing 6 h of oxygenated HMP indicates that oxygenated HMP may be a useful technology for better preservation of pancreases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason B Doppenberg
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Leemkuil
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marten A Engelse
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christina Krikke
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eelco J P de Koning
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henri G D Leuvenink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Sousa SG, Nascimento da Silva GV, Costa Rodrigues AM, Meireles Fernandes da Silva TM, Costa FC, Freitas Teixeira da Silva A, Santana de Macedo BF, Brito MVH. Organ Preservation Solutions in Transplantation: A Literature Review. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 19:511-521. [PMID: 33797354 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Renal transplant with ABO-incompatible donors expands the donor pool. Earlier studies have focused the use of protocol biopsies in ABOincompatible transplant patients. Our study described outcomes of indication (for cause) renal biopsies and clinical outcomes in patients with ABO-incompatible renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 164 patients from January 2012 to June 2019. Biochemical parameters, serial immunoglobulin G anti-ABO titers, and class I and II donor-specific antibody findings were obtained from hospital records, and renal graft biopsies were reviewed according to the Banff 2017 update. RESULTS We analyzed the results of 65 biopsies from 54 patients. Biopsy-proven acute antibody-mediated rejection (12.8%) was found to be more prevalent than acute cellular rejection (1.8%). Patients with antibodymediated rejection all had microvascular inflammation (g+ptc score of 2 or more, where g+ptc is the sum of the glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis scores) and were positive for C4d. Acute tubular injury per se was seen in 10.3% of patients; 65% of these patients had C4d positivity in peritubular capillaries, and only 1 patient developed chronic active antibody-mediated rejection on follow-up. Patient and death-censored graft survival rates were 92% and 98% at 1 year after transplant and 88% and 91% at 3 years, respectively. Patients with an episode of antibody-mediated rejection had lower rates of patient (76.5%) and deathcensored graft survival (84.6%) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS The microvascular inflammation score (g+ptc score of 2 or higher) is more reliable than diffuse C4d positivity to determine antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-incompatible transplants because diffuse C4d positivity may also be seen in etiologies unrelated to antibody-mediated rejection. Acute tubular injury with C4d positivity without microvascular injury does not confirm antibody-mediated rejection. We suggest that Banff classification be updated in ABOincompatible transplants to include diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Beta-cell replacement is the best therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes. Because of donor scarcity, more extended criteria donors are used for transplantation. Donation after circulatory death donors (DCD) are not commonly used for pancreas transplantation, because of the supposed higher risk of complications. This review gives an overview on the pathophysiology, risk factors, and outcome in DCD transplantation and discusses different preservation methods. RECENT FINDINGS Studies on outcomes of DCD pancreata show similar results compared with those of donation after brain death (DBD), when accumulation of other risk factors is avoided. Hypothermic machine perfusion is shown to be a safe method to improve graft viability in experimental settings. DCD should not be the sole reason to decline a pancreas for transplantation. Adequate donor selection and improved preservation techniques can lead to enhanced pancreas utilization and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Leemkuil
- 0000 0000 9558 4598grid.4494.dDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H. G. D. Leuvenink
- 0000 0000 9558 4598grid.4494.dDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R. A. Pol
- 0000 0000 9558 4598grid.4494.dDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Messner F, Guo Y, Etra JW, Brandacher G. Emerging technologies in organ preservation, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: a blessing or curse for transplantation? Transpl Int 2019; 32:673-685. [PMID: 30920056 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Since the beginning of transplant medicine in the 1950s, advances in surgical technique and immunosuppressive therapy have created the success story of modern organ transplantation. However, today more than ever, we are facing a huge discrepancy between organ supply and demand, limiting the potential for transplantation to save and improve the lives of millions. To address the current limitations and shortcomings, a variety of emerging new technologies focusing on either maximizing the availability of organs or on generating new organs and organ sources hold great potential to eventully overcoming these hurdles. These advances are mainly in the field of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. This review gives an overview of this emerging field and its multiple sub-disciplines and highlights recent advances and existing limitations for widespread clinical application and potential impact on the future of transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franka Messner
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Yinan Guo
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Joanna W Etra
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|