1
|
Salvador VF, Morais IMLD, Leal LLLL, Tamiozo GL, Chagas HDF, Silva IS, Ferreira LL, Borges FDA, Prata MCA, Costa-Junior LM, da Costa AJ, Monteiro CMDO, Lopes WDZ. Resistance of Rhipicephalus microplus to different acaricides in tropical climates: Are the laboratory and field results related? Vet Parasitol 2025; 336:110441. [PMID: 40088617 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2025] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025]
Abstract
The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the relationship between laboratory (Larval Packet Test -LPT; Larval Immersion Test - LIT; Adult Immersion Test - AIT) and field studies using active ingredients or commercial formulations to control R. microplus in a tropical region. This comparative study was carried out with four populations of R. microplus from four Brazilian farms. For laboratory assays, technical grade compounds of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos were used in the LPT, while fipronil and ivermectin were used in the LIT. The AIT was conducted using commercial spray formulations containing pyrethroid and organophosphate: cypermethrin 187.5 ppm + chlorpyrifos 375 ppm + fenthion 187.5 ppm and chlorpyrifos 825 ppm + High-Cis cypermethrin 99 ppm. For the field assays, the same commercial products of the AIT used, a pour-on formulation of fipronil 1 mg/kg, injectable 200 µg/kg ivermectin, injectable 630 µg/kg ivermectin, injectable 200 µg/kg doramectin and injectable 200 µg/kg moxidectin. For field studies, populations of R. microplus with the mean therapeutic efficacy ≤89 %, on days 7 up to 21 post-treatment, were classified as resistant to such compounds. To standardize the comparative analysis between laboratory and field results, this same value of larval efficacy or mortality (≤89 %) was used to classify the population as resistant by laboratory tests (LPT, LIT, and AIT). Of the 16 laboratory tests conducted using R. microplus larvae (LPT and LIT), 66.6 % showed no relation with field study results. Inconsistencies were observed in 100 % of cases for spray formulations, 25 % for fipronil, and 75 % for macrocyclic lactones. Although the efficacy results of the AIT with commercial formulations were slightly higher than the therapeutic efficacy observed in the field, it is important to note that there was a 100 % positive relation in the classification of the status of the four populations, which were all considered susceptible in both laboratory and field analyses. These findings demonstrate that, in situations like this study, it is essential to calibrate laboratory tests using larvae, particularly against field results, for each formulation. This approach will allow for more accurate recommendations regarding the use of a chemical formulation for a specific tick population. Furthermore, it reduces the risk of incorrectly identifying R. microplus population as resistant or susceptible and helps clarify the practical implications of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gabriel Lopes Tamiozo
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | | | - Isabela Santos Silva
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | - Lorena Lopes Ferreira
- Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Fernando de Almeida Borges
- Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
| | | | | | - Alvimar José da Costa
- Departamento de Patologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil
| | - Caio Márcio de Oliveira Monteiro
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; Departamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | - Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; Departamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mauri Pablo JD, Del Solar JJC, Hinojosa Enciso ET, Polveiro RC, Vieira DDS, Ramos Sanchez EM, Bardales Escalante W, Maicelo Quintana JL, Lopez Lapa RM. Anaplasmosis in the Amazon: diagnostic challenges, persistence, and control of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Front Vet Sci 2025; 12:1571694. [PMID: 40438413 PMCID: PMC12116455 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1571694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2025] [Accepted: 04/02/2025] [Indexed: 06/01/2025] Open
Abstract
Anaplasmosis remains a significant threat to livestock production in tropical regions, particularly in the Amazon basin, where ecological complexity and limited veterinary infrastructure challenge effective disease management. This review focuses on Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the primary species associated with bovine and granulocytic anaplasmosis, respectively. We examine the current state of diagnostic tools, highlighting the limited accessibility of molecular techniques in rural settings and the emerging but underutilized potential of technologies. Persistent infection and antigenic variation are explored as major obstacles for disease eradication and vaccine development. Although live attenuated and inactivated vaccines are in use for A. marginale, none provide sterilizing immunity, and no commercial vaccines exist for A. phagocytophilum. The review evaluates recent advances in recombinant antigens, chimeric constructs, and genetically attenuated strains, as well as future directions involving multiepitope design, novel adjuvants, and next-generation vaccine platforms. Additionally, we assess the role of tick control in disease prevention and emphasize the importance of integrated strategies in regions like the Amazon. Together, these findings underscore the need for context-specific solutions that address the ecological and epidemiological complexity of anaplasmosis in the Amazon basin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhorsan David Mauri Pablo
- Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
| | - Jakson Jacob Chuquimia Del Solar
- Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
| | - Elthon Thomas Hinojosa Enciso
- Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
| | - Richard Costa Polveiro
- Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
| | - Dielson da Silva Vieira
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | | | - William Bardales Escalante
- Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
| | - Jorge Luis Maicelo Quintana
- Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
| | - Rainer Marco Lopez Lapa
- Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Agronegocios y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodrigues DDC, Gomes GW, Vale FL, Teixeira ALC, Silva IS, Chagas HDF, Strydom T, Torres S, de Mendonça RP, de Almeida Borges F, Costa Junior L, Ferreira LL, Lopes WDZ, Monteiro C. Acaricidal efficacy of fluralaner against Rhipicephalus microplus ticks under laboratory and field conditions in Brazil. Parasit Vectors 2025; 18:161. [PMID: 40296035 PMCID: PMC12039197 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-025-06775-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first isoxazoline-based acaricide (fluralaner) for the control of Rhipicephalus microplus was introduced onto the market in 2022, initially in Brazil, followed by other Latin American countries. Therefore, it is important to establish laboratory methods to monitor the susceptibility of populations of R. microplus to this molecule and to determine the relationship between the results of laboratory tests and those from field trials. METHODS A larval immersion test (LIT) was performed on 18 populations of R. microplus. The lethal concentration 50 (concentration causing 50% mortality [LC50]) values were calculated to determine the resistance ratios (RRs) of the populations. The lethal concentration 99 (concentration causing 99% mortality [LC99]) values were calculated to determine the discriminating doses (DDs = 2 × LC99). The DDs were applied in tests with the POA (susceptible) and GYN (resistant) strains, as well as in tests with the population that presented the lowest LC50 value (population 14) and with the two populations that presented the highest LC50 value (populations 10 and 16). Finally, we performed field trials with the population that presented the lowest and two highest LC50 values. RESULTS In the LIT with fluralaner, the LC50 values ranged from 0.144 to 0.481 µg/mL for the 18 R. microplus populations. The mortality rate was 100% in the tests of the DDs in the five populations tested. In the field trials, the efficacy of fluralaner was similar for the three populations of R. microplus tested (populations 14, 10 and 16), with therapeutic efficacy (until day 21) of 100% and persistent efficacy (between days 28 and 42) > 95%. CONCLUSION We observed natural variability in the susceptibility of larvae from the different populations of R. microplus that had never been treated with this compound. Despite the observed variability in the in vitro results (LC50), a comparable efficacy of > 90% lasting until day 42 was observed in the field trials. Also, based on the results of the laboratory testing (LC50 and DD) and field trials, we can conclude that there was no resistance to fluralaner in the 18 studied tick populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel de Castro Rodrigues
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
- MSD Animal Health, Avenida Dr. Chucri Zaidan, 246-96, 9th Floor, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04583-110, Brazil
| | - Gabriel Webert Gomes
- Undergraduate Program in Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
| | - Francisca Leticia Vale
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
| | - Ana Lúcia Coutinho Teixeira
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
| | - Isabela Santos Silva
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
| | - Haile Dean Figueiredo Chagas
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
| | - Tom Strydom
- MSD Animal Health, 20 Spartan Road, Kempton Park 1619, Isando, South Africa
| | | | | | - Fernando de Almeida Borges
- Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Av. Senador Felinto Muller, 2443, Campo Grande, MS, 79070-900, Brazil
| | - Lívio Costa Junior
- CCBS Research Center, Federal University of Maranhão, Avenida dos Santos, Portugueses, no. 1966, São Luís, MA, 65080-805, Brazil
| | - Lorena Lopes Ferreira
- Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil
- Department of Biosciences and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, R. 235, S/N°-University East Sector, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil
| | - Caio Monteiro
- Graduate Program in Animal Science-School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás-Samambaia Campus, Nova Veneza Highway, Km 8, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
- Department of Biosciences and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, R. 235, S/N°-University East Sector, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Souza GR, de Araújo BRG, Coelho SG, Araújo RN, Lopes WDZ, Rodrigues DS, Ferreira LL. First evaluation of the efficacy and operational cost of acaricidal bath combining different droplet sizes, pressures and spray patterns in dairy cows naturally infested with Rhipicephalus microplus. Trop Anim Health Prod 2025; 57:138. [PMID: 40117031 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-025-04378-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
Rhipicephalus microplus poses a significant challenge to animal health. This study evaluated efficacy and the effective operational cost (EOC) of different acaricidal treatments varying droplet size, pressure and spray pattern using a power sprayer. Three experiments were conducted on dairy cows, with each experiment involving three groups of 10 animals: two treated groups and one untreated control group. In the first experiment, acaricide treatments with the same droplet size (medium) were compared at different pressures (50 and 100 psi) using a full cone spray pattern: E1-M50 and E1-M100. In the second experiment, different droplet sizes (fine and medium) were compared at the same pressure (100 psi) using a full cone spray pattern: E2-F100 and E2-M100. The third experiment compared droplet sizes and spray patterns (fine at full cone and ultra coarse at flat fan) at the same pressure (100 psi): E3-F100 and E3-UC100. All animals received acaricide treatment on day 0 with a product based on organophosphate and pyrethroid. Tick counts were performed on days + 7, + 14, and + 21 to determine treatment effectiveness. Data on bath time were collected to determine the EOC, besides cost with acaricide, labor, water and electricity. No statistical differences (p > 0.05) regarding the mean tick count were observed between treated groups in all experiments. However, the highest efficacy values were found in treatments with larger droplets (medium and ultra coarse) and higher pressure (100 psi). In experiment 1, the efficacy varied from 70.6 to 88.9% and 75.2 to 93.7% for the treated groups E1-M50 and E1-M100, respectively. In experiment 2, efficacy varied from 48.7 to 86.2% for E2-F100 and from 68 to 94.7% for E2-M100. In experiment 3, efficacy ranged from 62.9 to 76.9% for E3-F100 and from 73.4 to 86.5% for E3-UC100. The EOC of the acaricide bath varied between 0.42 and 0.46 USD per animal. The findings show that treatment efficacy and EOC vary depending on the spray parameters used for the control of R. microplus, but further studies should be conducted to determine better combinations of pressure, droplet size and spray pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Resende Souza
- Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Beatriz Rezende Gandra de Araújo
- Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Sandra Gesteira Coelho
- Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Nascimento Araújo
- Laboratório de Fisiologia de Insetos Hematófagos, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | - Daniel Sobreira Rodrigues
- Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, Campo Experimental Santa Rita, Prudente de Morais, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Lorena Lopes Ferreira
- Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Batista Junior A, Maciel LÍ, Rocha YA, Souza GG, Vaz BG, Lopes WDZ, Botelho AF, Chalom MY, Chaves AR. Assessing Antiparasitic Compounds Persistence in Cattle Hair by DART-MS. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY 2025; 36:201-208. [PMID: 39601233 PMCID: PMC11697339 DOI: 10.1021/jasms.4c00422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 11/13/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
This study introduces an alternative strategy for evaluating antiparasitic persistence compounds in cattle hair by Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry (DART-MS). The developed DART-MS method aimed to determine fenthion, chlorpyrifos, and cypermethrin in cattle hair samples. DART-MS analyses were performed in positive ion mode, and parameters related to the DART source were evaluated. The analytical performance demonstrated the efficiency of the optimized DART-MS method for fenthion, chlorpyrifos, and cypermethrin quantification in the evaluated samples, meeting criteria for precision, accuracy and limits of detection. Overall, the DART-MS method provided a fast and efficient analysis for determination of antiparasitic agents in cattle hair, which contributes to the evaluation of drug administration protocols and dosage intervals, and aids the safety and advancement of the livestock sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yuri Arrates Rocha
- Universidade
Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Química, Goiânia, Goiás 74690-900, Brazil
| | | | - Boniek Gontijo Vaz
- Universidade
Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Química, Goiânia, Goiás 74690-900, Brazil
| | | | | | - Marc Yves Chalom
- SENS
Advanced Mass Spectrometry, 05319-000, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cardoso ERN, Carvalho SF, Dias SA, Santos RA, Tavares MA, Neves LC, Paula WVDF, Pádua GT, de Lima NJ, Paludo RLDR, Silva IS, Bittencourt RBM, dos Santos GC, Nascimento FGDJ, de Paula LGF, Dantas-Torres F, Monteiro CMDO, Krawczak FDS. Susceptibility of Amblyomma sculptum, Vector of Rickettsia rickettsii, Ticks from a National Park and an Experimental Farm to Different Synthetic Acaricides. Pathogens 2023; 12:1304. [PMID: 38003769 PMCID: PMC10675591 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12111304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Amblyomma sculptum is a relevant tick species from a One Health perspective, playing an important role as a vector of Rickettsia rickettsii, the main agent of spotted fever rickettsiosis in Brazil. In this study, we evaluated the susceptibility of two A. sculptum populations from Goiás state (midwestern Brazil) to different acaricides. The first tick population (GYN strain) originated from an experimental farm, where the ticks are annually exposed to acaricides. The second (PNE strain) was collected in a national park (Emas National Park), where the ticks had not been exposed to acaricides. Immersion tests were conducted with 21-day-old laboratory-reared larvae and nymphs originating from adult ticks collected in the areas mentioned above. The chosen acaricides were two synthetic pyrethroids (cypermethrin and deltamethrin), one organophosphate (chlorfenvinphos), one formamidine (amitraz), and two combinations of pyrethroids and organophosphates (cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos and citronellal; cypermethrin, fenthion and chlorpyrifos). Mortality data were used to determine the lethal concentration (LC) values at which 50%, 90%, and 99% of the ticks died (LC50, LC90, and LC99, respectively), and resistance ratios (RR) were calculated based on the LC values. The RR revealed differences between the acaricide-exposed (GYN) and unexposed (PNE) tick strains. The PNE strain larvae and nymphs were susceptible to all the tested acaricides. The GYN strain larvae were tolerant to cypermethrin, whereas the nymphs were tolerant to deltamethrin, chlorfenvinphos, and the combination of cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, and citronellal (2 < RR ≤ 10). The GYN strain nymphs were resistant to amitraz (RR > 10). This is the first report of A. sculptum nymphs with resistance to amitraz and tolerance to deltamethrin, chlorfenvinphos, and the combination of cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, and citronellal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ennya Rafaella Neves Cardoso
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Stephani Félix Carvalho
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Sarah Alves Dias
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Rayane Almeida Santos
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Mariana Avelar Tavares
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Lucianne Cardoso Neves
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Warley Vieira de Freitas Paula
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Gracielle Teles Pádua
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Nicolas Jalowitzki de Lima
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Raquel Loren dos Reis Paludo
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Isabela Santos Silva
- Laboratório de Biologia, Ecologia e Controle de Carrapatos—LABEC, Centro de Parasitologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (I.S.S.); (C.M.D.O.M.)
| | - Raphaela Bueno Mendes Bittencourt
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Gabriel Cândido dos Santos
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Flavia Giovana de Jesus Nascimento
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Luiza Gabriella Ferreira de Paula
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| | - Filipe Dantas-Torres
- Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, Department of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Recife 50740-465, Brazil;
| | - Caio Marcio De Oliveira Monteiro
- Laboratório de Biologia, Ecologia e Controle de Carrapatos—LABEC, Centro de Parasitologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (I.S.S.); (C.M.D.O.M.)
| | - Felipe da Silva Krawczak
- Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias—LADOPAR, Setor de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás—UFG, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil; (E.R.N.C.); (S.F.C.); (S.A.D.); (R.A.S.); (M.A.T.); (L.C.N.); (W.V.d.F.P.); (G.T.P.); (N.J.d.L.); (R.L.d.R.P.); (R.B.M.B.); (G.C.d.S.); (F.G.d.J.N.); (L.G.F.d.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nicaretta JE, de Melo Junior RD, Naves RB, de Morais IML, Salvador VF, Leal LLLL, Teixeira ALC, Ferreira LL, Klafke GM, Monteiro CMDO, Borges FDA, Costa Junior LM, Rodrigues DS, Lopes WDZ. Selective versus strategic control against Rhipicephalus microplus in cattle: A comparative analysis of efficacy, animal health, productivity, cost, and resistance management. Vet Parasitol 2023; 321:109999. [PMID: 37556962 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.109999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
This study compared selective control versus strategic control against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, under conditions of a real dairy farm. Strategic control requires that all animals be treated with acaricide at regular pre-determined intervals. Selective control only requires treatment of infested animals and only when they are at or above a pre-determined threshold. Tick counts on animals and in pasture were performed and the susceptibility of tick populations to the different treatment methods was evaluated at the beginning and end of the study using the Larval Packet Test, Larval Immersion Test, and Adult Immersion Test. Over the four years of the study strategic control was more advantageous than the selective control as the group experienced lower tick burden on animals and in pasture, absence of skin lesions and myiases, lower operating costs, treatments concentrated in fewer months of the year and lower resistance pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Eduardo Nicaretta
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | | | - Raphaela Barbosa Naves
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Lorena Lopes Ferreira
- Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Marcondes Klafke
- Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor - Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural, Eldorado do Sul, RS, Brazil
| | - Caio Marcio de Oliveira Monteiro
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; Departamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | - Fernando de Almeida Borges
- Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
| | | | - Daniel Sobreira Rodrigues
- Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, Campo Experimental Santa Rita, Prudente de Morais, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Welber Daniel Zanetti Lopes
- Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil; Departamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|