Performance of GeneXpert ultra in the diagnosis of Tuberculous Cervical lymphadenitis in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues

HBHA-IGRA and cytotoxic mediators release assays for the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis

IMPORTANCE

Cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (CTL), the most frequent extrapulmonary form of tuberculosis, is currently a major health problem in Tunisia and in several regions around the world. CTL diagnosis is challenging mainly due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease and the potential misdiagnosis as cervical non-tuberculous lymphadenitis. This study demonstrates the added value of the heparin-binding hemagglutinin-interferon-gamma release assay as an immunoassay in the context of CTL.

Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is an arduous task owing to different anatomical locations, unusual clinical presentations, and sparse bacillary load in clinical specimens. Although GeneXpert® MTB/RIF is a windfall in TB diagnostics including EPTB, it yields low sensitivities but high specificities in many EPTB specimens. To further improve the sensitivity of GeneXpert®, GeneXpert® Ultra, a fully nested real-time PCR targeting IS6110, IS1081 and rpoB (Rv0664) has been endorsed by the WHO (2017), wherein melt curve analysis is utilized to detect rifampicin-resistance (RIF-R).

AREA COVERED

We described the assay chemistry/work design of Xpert Ultra and evaluated its performance in several EPTB types, that is, TB lymphadenitis, TB pleuritis, TB meningitis, and so on, against the microbiological reference standard or composite reference standard. Notably, Xpert Ultra exhibited better sensitivities than Xpert, but mostly at the compensation of specificity values. Moreover, Xpert Ultra exhibited low false-negative and false-positive RIF-R results, compared with Xpert. We also detailed other molecular tests, that is, Truenat MTBTM/TruPlus, commercial real-time PCR, line probe assay, and so on, for EPTB diagnosis.

EXPERT OPINION

A combination of clinical features, imaging, histopathological findings, and Xpert Ultra are adequate for definite EPTB diagnosis so as to initiate an early anti-tubercular therapy.

Comparison of Performances of GeneXpert MTB/RIF, Bactec MGIT 960, and Bactec Myco/F Systems in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Biopsy Tissues: a Retrospective Study

Tuberculosis remains a major global public concern as a leading cause of health care-associated infections. The detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is challenging due to the paucibacillary nature of the pathogen. For suspected pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients, if sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), related samples are negative for MTB, or suspected tumors, biopsy tissues may provide a better diagnostic yield. This study was aimed at comparing the performances of three methods in identifying MTB in biopsy tissues, including the Bactec mycobacterial growth indicator tube 960 (MGIT 960) system, the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (GeneXpert), and the Bactec Myco/F lytic culture (Myco/F) system. Biopsy samples from 3,209 nonduplicated patients were retrospectively enrolled between January 2018 and September 2021, of which 180 (5.6%) were positive for MTB by at least one method. GeneXpert revealed the highest recovery rate (134/162, 82.7%), followed by MGIT 960 (99/135, 73.3%) and Myco/F (26/143, 18.1%), and the composite positive rate for GeneXpert and MGIT 960 was 96.6% (173/179). Pairwise comparisons were conducted after completion of both tests, and the results showed that Myco/F had significantly lower detection rates than GeneXpert and MGIT 960 (16.4% versus 82.8%, P < 0.001; 14.3% versus 71.4%, P < 0.001). In summary, GeneXpert was the most sensitive and recommended method for MTB detection in biopsy tissues, and the combination of GeneXpert and MGIT 960 could improve the overall diagnostic yield. IMPORTANCE Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) poses a severe threat to public health worldwide. The diagnosis of tuberculosis is challenging due to the low load of the microorganism in samples. Biopsy tissues are sometimes collected via invasive procedures with limited size, and additional samples are often inaccessible. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, Bactec MGIT 960 system, and Bactec Myco/F lytic system have been used in detecting MTB in our laboratory. Here, we evaluated the performances of these three methods in 3,209 biopsy tissues samples to establish a more effective protocol based on clinical requirements. Attempts for a locally optimized protocol should be always made.

Evaluating the efficacy of stool sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and its comparison with other sample types by meta-analysis for TB diagnostics

Precise and timely detection of tuberculosis (TB) is crucial to reduce transmission. This study aims to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on stool samples and systematically review the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with different sample types by meta-analysis. Stool samples of smear-negative pulmonary TB (PTB), cervical lymph node TB, and abdominal TB patients were tested on the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra system. Meta-analysis was performed on a set of 44 studies. Data were grouped by sample type, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra were calculated. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra with stool samples was 100% for smear-negative PTB, 27.27% for cervical lymph node TB, and 50% for abdominal TB patients, with 100% specificity for all included TB groups. The summary estimate for all PTB samples showed 84.2% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity, and EPTB samples showed 88.6% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity. Among all sample types included in our meta-analysis, urine showed the best performance for EPTB diagnosis. This pilot study supports the use of stool as an alternative non-invasive sample on Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for rapid testing, suitable for both PTB and EPTB diagnosis.