Differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening: the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Interpretation, Reporting, Imaging-Based Workups, and Surveillance of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening: 2025 Recommendations From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

Ultrasound of the gallbladder: not the same bag of tricks

Imaging evaluation of the gallbladder is a fundamental skill in the majority of radiology practice. Due to ease of accessibility, low cost, lack of ionizing radiation, and excellent spatial resolution, ultrasound is often the first imaging modality used to evaluate the gallbladder. In this invited article we review and update how ultrasound can evaluate common pathologies including gallbladder polyps, tumefactive sludge, adenomyomatosis, and acute cholecystitis. We also discuss the role of Doppler, microvascular flow imaging, and contrast enhanced ultrasound in the sonographic assessment of the gallbladder.

Should we suspect gallbladder cancer if which CT finding is observed in patients with localized gallbladder wall thickening?

PURPOSE

To identify high-risk computed tomography (CT) features for predicting gallbladder (GB) cancer in patients presenting with localized GB wall thickening.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 120 patients (mean age: 63.9 ± 10.0 years; 51 men) exhibiting localized GB wall thickening on CT scans obtained between January 2008 and May 2017. Two radiologists independently evaluated CT imaging features for predicting GB cancer. The diagnostic performance of significant imaging features and their combinations was evaluated. High-risk CT features ranked by accuracy were delineated for predicting GB cancer.

RESULTS

This study included 55 patients with GB cancer and 65 with benign GB conditions. The top-four most accurate CT imaging features for predicting GB cancer were identified: heterogeneously enhancing single layer or strongly enhancing thick inner layer; GB wall thickness > 6.5 mm; hyperenhancement on arterial phase; and absence of intramural small cystic lesions (accuracies of 90.0 %, 88.3 %, 85.0 %, and 85.0 %, respectively). The combination of any three high-risk features exhibited the highest accuracy (94.2 %). The presence of any high-risk feature yielded a sensitivity of 100 %, whereas that of all high-risk features indicated a specificity of 100 %.

CONCLUSION

CT imaging features, whether alone or in combination, could effectively and accurately predict GB cancer among patients with localized GB wall thickening. This finding holds significance in guiding decisions regarding further diagnostic tests and treatment planning.

Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gallbladder Disease Diagnosis

Gallbladder (GB) disease is classified into two broad categories: GB wall-thickening and protuberant lesions, which include various lesions, such as adenomyomatosis, cholecystitis, GB polyps, and GB carcinoma. This review summarizes recent advances in the differential diagnosis of GB lesions, focusing primarily on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and related technologies. Fundamental B-mode EUS and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) have been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of GB diseases because they can evaluate the thickening of the GB wall and protuberant lesions in detail. We also outline the current status of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for GB lesions, as there have been scattered reports on EUS-FNA in recent years. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, ranging from machine learning to deep learning, have become popular in healthcare for disease diagnosis, drug discovery, drug development, and patient risk identification. In this review, we outline the current status of AI in the diagnosis of GB.

Value of high frame rate contrast enhanced ultrasound in gallbladder wall thickening in non-acute setting

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) has been widely used in screening and differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening (GWT). However, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer are limited, leading to delayed treatment or overtreatment. We aim to explore the value of high frame rate contrast enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) in distinguishing wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (malignant) from GWT mimicking malignancy (benign).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with non-acute GWT who underwent US and H-CEUS examination before cholecystectomy. Clinical information, US image and H-CEUS image characteristics between malignant and benign GWT were compared. The independent risk factors for malignant GWT on H-CEUS images were selected by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of H-CEUS in determining malignant GWT was compared with that of the gallbladder reporting and data system (GB-RADS) score.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients included 30 benign GWTs and 16 malignant GWTs. Only mural layering and interface with liver on US images were significantly different between malignant and benign GWT (P < 0.05). Differences in enhancement direction, vascular morphology, serous layer continuity, wash-out time and mural layering in the venous phase of GWT on H-CEUS images were significant between malignant and benign GWT (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of H-CEUS based on enhancement direction, vascular morphology and wash-out time in the diagnosis of malignant GWT were 93.75%, 90.00%, and 91.30%, respectively. However, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the GB-RADS score were only 68.75%, 73.33% and 71.74%, respectively. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of H-CEUS was significantly higher than that of the GB-RADS score (AUC = 0.965 vs. 0.756).

CONCLUSIONS

H-CEUS can accurately detect enhancement direction, vascular morphology and wash-out time of GWT, with a higher diagnostic performance than the GB-RADS score in determining wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer. This study provides a novel imaging means with high accuracy for the diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer, thus may be better avoiding delayed treatment or overtreatment.

Incidental Findings of Gallbladder and Bile Ducts-Management Strategies: General Aspects, Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening-A World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) Position Paper

The World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings with a series of position papers to give advice on characterization and management. The biliary system (gallbladder and biliary tree) is the third most frequent site for incidental findings. This first part of the position paper on incidental findings of the biliary system is related to general aspects, gallbladder polyps and other incidental findings of the gallbladder wall. Available evidence on prevalence, diagnostic work-up, malignancy risk, follow-up and treatment is summarized with a special focus on ultrasound techniques. Multiparametric ultrasound features of gallbladder polyps and other incidentally detected gallbladder wall pathologies are described, and their inclusion in assessment of malignancy risk and decision- making on further management is suggested.

Pathological gallbladder wall thickening is associated with advanced chronic liver disease and independent of serum albumin

PURPOSE

Increased gallbladder wall thickness (GBWT) is a common finding. Reported causes include advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD), ascites and hypalbuminemia. GBWT is a marker for the prediction of esophageal varices. It remains unclear which of these factors is the decisive driver of GBWT. We aim to investigate whether there is a predominant factor associated with the GBWT.

METHODS

We enrolled 258 patients with ascites, hypalbuminemia and/or ACLD and 98 healthy volunteers that underwent abdominal ultrasound. Differences of mean GBWT in subgroups of patients with ACLD, ascites, and/or hypalbuminemia were analyzed. Correlation between various parameters and GBWT were calculated using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

GBWT in patients with ACLD + ascites + hypalbuminemia (n = 59; 5.70 ± 2.05 mm) was pathologically increased compared to patients with hypalbuminemia + ascites without ACLD (n = 36; 2.14 ± 0.66 mm; p < .001) and to patients with only hypalbuminemia (n = 76; 2.02 ± 0.80 mm; p < .001). GBWT of patients with ACLD + hypalbuminemia (n = 30; 3.42 ± 1.52 mm) and with ACLD and normal albumin level were not different (n = 46; 3.10 ± 1.62 mm; p > .999). Significant correlation was seen between GBWT and ACLD (r = .53; p < .001) and ascites (r = .51; p < .001) but not albumin level (r = .04; p = .510).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that ACLD is predominantly associated with GBWT. In contrast to the current literature, serum albumin level appears not to be associated with pathological GBWT.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound versus multiphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography in evaluation of gallbladder lesions

AIM

To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and multiphasic contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in differentiating benign and malignant gallbladder (GB) lesions.

METHODS

This prospective ethical review board approved study comprised consecutive patients with GB lesions who underwent CEUS and multiphasic CECT at a tertiary care referral center. The enhancement patterns at CEUS and CT were compared. The quantitative CEUS parameters including arrival time (AT), AT in liver, time to peak enhancement, and washout time (WT) were assessed. The diagnostic performance of CEUS and CT features was calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with GB wall thickening. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify features significantly associated with malignancy.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 30 patients (mean age, 52.8 ± 12.2 years, 17 females) with GB lesions were evaluated. Benign and malignant diseases were present in 13 and 17 patients, respectively. There was excellent agreement between CEUS and CT findings. Among the quantitative CEUS features, only WT was significantly associated with malignancy in the overall group (p < 0.001) and wall thickening subgroup (p = 0.007). WT within 53.5 s and 51.5 s had sensitivity of 88.2% and 81.8% and specificity of 84.5% and 100% in diagnosing malignant lesions in the overall group (AUC 0.900) and the wall thickening subgroup (area under curve, AUC 0.927), respectively. At multivariate analysis, features that were significantly associated with malignant lesions in the overall group were disruption of GB wall (CEUS), intralesional non-enhancing areas (CEUS), liver involvement (CEUS or CT), and arterial phase hyperenhancement (CT) in the overall group and disruption of GB wall (CEUS), WT (CEUS), and liver involvement (CEUS or CT) in the wall thickening subgroup.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a useful adjunct to CT in evaluation of GB lesions. Its utilization in patients with GB wall thickening may improve detection of malignancy.

Grayscale ultrasonography findings for characterization of gallbladder wall thickening in non-acute setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate characterization of gallbladder wall thickening (GWT) into benign or malignant on ultrasound (US) is a significant challenge.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies reporting two-dimensional grayscale US in benign and malignant GWT. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a generalized linear mixed method with a random-effects model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 7309 studies screened by titles, 73 studies with 18,008 patients were included. The most common findings in xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) were lack of wall disruption and intramural hypoechoic nodules while adenomyomatosis (ADM) was frequently associated with intramural cysts and intramural echogenic foci. Echogenic foci, lack of gallbladder wall disruption, and hypoechoic nodules had a sensitivity of 89%, 77%, and 66% and specificity of 86%, 51%, and 80%, respectively for the diagnosis of benign GWT. Focal thickening and indistinct liver interface had a sensitivity of 75% and 55% and specificity of 64% and 69%, respectively for the diagnosis of malignant GWT.

CONCLUSION

intramural features (echogenic foci, hypoechoic nodules), gallbladder wall disruption, and liver interface are useful US features for the characterization of GWT.

Current update on gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder (GB) carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy and is associated with poor prognosis. Numerous risk factors have been associated with the development of GB carcinoma. GB carcinomas may present as mass lesions replacing the GB, focal or diffuse thickening of the GB wall, and intraluminal mass in the GB. Various benign conditions can mimic GB carcinoma. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathology, clinical findings, imaging features, and management of GB carcinomas.

How Can We Manage Gallbladder Lesions by Transabdominal Ultrasound?

The most important role of ultrasound (US) in the management of gallbladder (GB) lesions is to detect lesions earlier and differentiate them from GB carcinoma (GBC). To avoid overlooking lesions, postural changes and high-frequency transducers with magnified images should be employed. GB lesions are divided into polypoid lesions (GPLs) and wall thickening (GWT). For GPLs, classification into pedunculated and sessile types should be done first. This classification is useful not only for the differential diagnosis but also for the depth diagnosis, as pedunculated carcinomas are confined to the mucosa. Both rapid GB wall blood flow (GWBF) and the irregularity of color signal patterns on Doppler imaging, and heterogeneous enhancement in the venous phase on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) suggest GBC. Since GWT occurs in various conditions, subdividing into diffuse and focal forms is important. Unlike diffuse GWT, focal GWT is specific for GB and has a higher incidence of GBC. The discontinuity and irregularity of the innermost hyperechoic layer and irregular or disrupted GB wall layer structure suggest GBC. Rapid GWBF is also useful for the diagnosis of wall-thickened type GBC and pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Detailed B-mode evaluation using high-frequency transducers, combined with Doppler imaging and CEUS, enables a more accurate diagnosis.

Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy

Background

The diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder lesions is sometimes difficult. The objective of this study is to assess whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can be an accurate method for detecting gallbladder malignancy and to determine which imaging signs can be indicative of malignancy.

Methods

A study search of PubMed, Elsevier, and Sciencedirect was performed in May 2019. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were used to examine the accuracy of CEUS and CH-EUS.

Results

Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of CEUS and CH-EUS were 0.81 (0.75–0.86) and 0.92 (0.86–0.95); the specificities were 0.94 (0.90–0.96) and 0.89 (0.69–0. 97); the DORs were 64 (32–127) and 89 (22–354); and the area under the SROC curves were 0.90 (0.87–0.92) and 0.92 (0.90–0.94). On CEUS, the diagnostic criterion for gallbladder malignancy according to four features were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.65–0.83) and 0.98 (0.85–1.00) for integrity of gallbladder wall; 0.69 (0.55–0.81) and 0.89 (0.77–0.95) for heterogeneous enhancement; 0.81 (0.71–0.88) and 0.88 (0.76–0.94) for irregular vessels; and 0.81 (0.66–0.91) and 0.75 (0.59–0.86) for washout time within 28 s. On CH-EUS, heterogeneous enhancement could be indicative of malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 0.94 (0.85–0.97); and the specificity was 0.92 (0.71–0.98).

Conclusions

CEUS and CH-EUS are promising and reliable imaging modalities with a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy. CH-EUS might be more sensitive than CEUS with a higher sensitivity. In addition, irregular tralesional vessels and washout time within 28 s on CEUS and heterogeneous enhancement on CH-EUS are indicative of malignancy. However, larger scale and well-designed studies are warranted to verify our results.

Differential diagnosis of focal gallbladder lesions: The added value of contrast enhanced ultrasound with liner transducers

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To evaluate the benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with high frequency transducers in characterization of focal gallbladder lesions (FGL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2017 to April 2019, 59 FGL detected by B mode ultrasound (BMUS) were examined, first with the low frequency convex transducer (1-5 MHz) and afterwards with high frequency transducer (7.5-12 MHz). High frequency dynamic CEUS were applied after bolus injection of 4.8 ml Sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (SonoVue®, Milan). The BMUS and CEUS imaging features were recorded and compared. All lesions were confirmed by surgical resection and histopathologic results.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses of 59 FGL included gallbladder adenocarcinoma (n = 15), gallbladder polyps (n = 11), gallbladder adenomas (n = 18), focal adenomyomatosis (n = 9), and gallbladder Ascariasis debris (n = 6). The mean diameter of FGL was 24.5±11.4 mm, and mean depth to the abdominal wall was 21.2±7.3 mm. While applying CEUS with high frequency transducer, specific diagnostic features, including arterial phase irregular intralesional vascularity (10/15, 66.7%), late phase hypoenhancement (12/15, 80%), destruction of gallbladder wall (8/15, 53.3%), infiltration to the adjacent liver (6/15, 40.0%) were significantly higher in malignant FGL. The overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for the correct characterization of malignant FGL were significantly improved by CEUS with high frequency transducer (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 88.5%, accuracy 100%).

CONCLUSION

With its superior contrast resolution, CEUS performed with high frequency transducers is helpful to achieve better visualization of gallbladder fundus and make differential diagnosis of gallbladder lesions, which might greatly improve diagnostic confidence between malignant and benign FGL.

Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases

Benign gallbladder diseases usually present with intraluminal lesions and localized or diffuse wall thickening. Intraluminal lesions of the gallbladder include gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomas, or sludge and polypoid type of gallbladder cancer must subsequently be excluded. Polyp size, stalk width, and enhancement intensity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and degree of diffusion restriction may help differentiate cholesterol polyps and adenomas from gallbladder cancer. Localized gallbladder wall thickening is largely due to segmental or focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis, although infiltrative cancer may present similarly. Identification of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses is pivotal in diagnosing adenomyomatosis. The layered pattern, degree of enhancement, and integrity of the wall are imaging clues that help discriminate innocuous thickening from gallbladder cancer. High-resolution ultrasound is especially useful for analyzing the layering of gallbladder wall. A diffusely thickened wall is frequently seen in inflammatory processes of the gallbladder. Nevertheless, it is important to check for coexistent cancer in instances of acute cholecystitis. Ultrasound used alone is limited in evaluating complicated cholecystitis and often requires complementary computed tomography. In chronic cholecystitis, preservation of a two-layered wall and weak wall enhancement are diagnostic clues for excluding malignancy. Magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with diffusion-weighted imaging helps to differentiate xathogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer by identifying the presence of fat and degree of diffusion restriction. Such distinctions require a familiarity with typical imaging features of various gallbladder diseases and an understanding of the roles that assorted imaging modalities play in gallbladder evaluations.

Evaluation of gallbladder wall thickening: a multimodality imaging approach

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder (GB) wall thickening is a relatively common finding on imaging. While there are clear recommendations for the management of gallstones, GB wall thickening presents a significant challenge. Despite advances in radiological as well as endoscopic techniques, the ability to characterize GB wall thickening is still limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the currently available literature on various imaging investigations to characterize GB wall thickening. This review also summarizes the differences between benign and malignant GB wall thickening based on available imaging modalities. Transabdominal ultrasonography is the first-line investigation for evaluation of GB wall thickening. However, further characterization requires additional imaging tests. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the use of gadolinium and diffusion-weighted sequence is the preferred modality for GB wall characterization.

EXPERT OPINION

The accurate characterization of GB wall thickening is a challenging task. The available imaging criteria allow differentiation of benign and malignant GB wall thickening with moderate accuracy. The advanced imaging techniques, including contrast enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, and shear wave elastography, continue to evolve. There is a need for a well-designed reporting system for GB wall thickening to ensure uniformity of reporting of imaging tests, especially in regions with a high prevalence of GB cancer.

Incidentally detected focal fundal gallbladder wall thickening: Differentiation contrast enhanced ultrasound features with high-resolution linear transducers

AIM

To investigate the value of contrast enhanced ultrasound with high resolution linear transducers (HF-CEUS) for differential diagnosis of focal fundal gallbladder (GB) wall thickening.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with incidentally detected focal fundal GB wall thickening were included. After conventional B mode ultrasound (BMUS) examinations, HF-CEUS were performed with a 7.5-12 MHz 9L4 linear transducer (S2000 HELX OXANA unit, Siemens). Two radiologists independently reviewed the HF-CEUS enhancement patterns to determine the differential features between malignancy and benignity with a five-point confidence scale. The diagnostic accuracy of BMUS and HF-CEUS for GB wall thickening was compared. The final gold standard was surgery with histological examination.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses included GB adenocarcinoma (n = 16), adenomyomatosis (n = 12), Xanthogranulomatous (n = 2) and cholecystitis (n = 2). HF-CEUS features associated with GB adenocarcinoma including arterial phase inhomogeneous hyperenhancement, venous phase hypoenhancement and disruption of GB wall layer structure (P < 0.05). Two small (5 mm) liver metastasis were confirmed by HF-CEUS during the late phase liver sweep as hypoenhanced lesions. Nonenhanced Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses were clearly observed in 83.3% focal adenomyomatosis. Overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for differentiation between malignant and benign focal fundal GB wall thickening of HF-CEUS and BMUS were 84.3% vs 53.1%, 90.6% vs 59.3% and 87.5% vs 56.2% (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS performed with high frequency linear transducers could be a useful alternative in the differential diagnosis of focal fundal GB wall thickening on conventional ultrasound.

Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiation between Benign Mural Lesions and Adenocarcinoma of Gallbladder

Background

Mural lesions of gallbladder on ultrasound (US) are often difficult to characterize as benign or malignant.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in characterization of gallbladder (GB) wall lesions and making distinction between benign wall thickening and GB adenocarcinoma, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative parameters.

Methods

A total of 26 patients with GB wall lesions detected on sonography underwent CEUS. Lesions were evaluated on the basis of morphological imaging features, enhancement pattern, dynamic real-time contrast uptake, and intralesional vascularity.

Results

Overall, 19 patients had final diagnosis of GB adenocarcinoma, whereas seven patients had benign etiology. CEUS has enabled the differentiation of nonenhancing tumefactive sludge from enhancing mural lesions, thus improving the accuracy of morphological assessment of lesions. The intactness of outer wall was better assessed on CEUS. The dynamic postcontrast assessment showed that carcinoma showed early washout of contrast compared to benign thickening (P = 0.002). Nonlayered mural enhancement or thick enhancing inner layer with nonenhancing thin outer layer was associated with adenocarcinoma. The classification of intralesional vascularity on CEUS was not helpful in distinguishing benign lesions and adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

CEUS can increase the diagnostic confidence in differentiation between benign mural lesions and adenocarcinoma of GB.

Therapeutic effect of high-frequency ultrasound-assisted dye laser on hemangioma and its influence on serum HIF-1α in patients

Background

To analyze the therapeutic effect of high‐frequency ultrasound (HFU)‐assisted dye laser on hemangioma patients and changes in serum hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α).

Methods

A total of 20 patients diagnosed with hemangioma in our hospital from January 2013 to March 2018 were selected, including 12 males and eight females. All patients were treated with HFU‐assisted dye laser. The site and type of hemangioma and age distribution of patients were collected, and changes in data and area of hemangioma and serum HIF‐1α before and after treatment were analyzed.

Results

The vascular condition of hemangioma in all patients was significantly improved at 7, 14, and 30 days after treatment. Gray‐scale ultrasound displayed that the tumor area was reduced by more than 50%. After treatment, the serum HIF‐1α level declined obviously after treatment compared with that before treatment, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

HFU‐assisted dye laser can effectively reduce the tumor area, decrease the serum HIF‐1α level, and improve the prognosis in the treatment of hemangioma.

Differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the differential diagnosis of gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with GPLs (17 with gallbladder cancer, 19 with benign polyps) who underwent CEUS were enrolled in the study. The mean age of patients was 65.7 ± 12.6 years. Perflubutane-based contrast agent and high-mechanical index mode, which can eliminate the background B-mode and provide precise visualization of tumor vessels, were used for CEUS, and two blinded readers evaluated the images, retrospectively.

RESULTS

Patient age and size of malignant GPLs (72.4 ± 9.4 years and 23.4 ± 7.5 mm) were significantly greater than those for benign lesions (59.6 ± 12.3 years and 12.4 ± 2.9 mm) (P < 0.01, respectively), and the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the cut-off value as over 65 years and 16 mm. Univariate analysis showed that heterogeneity in B-mode (80% [12/15]), sessile shape (76% [13/17]), dilated vessel (71% [12/17]), irregular vessel (82% [14/17]), and heterogeneous enhancement (59% [10/17]) on CEUS were significantly correlated with malignant GPLs (P < 0.01, respectively). On CEUS, the diagnostic criterion for malignant GPLs was defined as having one or more of the above four features because of the highest accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignant GBLs were 88%, 68%, and 78% for patient age; 76%, 89%, and 83% for size of GPLs; 80%, 68%, and 74% for B-mode; and 94%, 89%, and 92% for CEUS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign GPLs.

Potential role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of malignant and benign gallbladder lesions in East Asia: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for all potential relevant articles published before December 2017. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were calculated by Meta-Disc Version 1.4 and STATA 12.0.

RESULTS

Twelve eligible studies were included in our study. A total of 1044 patients were assessed. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.84; inconsistency index [I] = 84.5%) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89; I = 94.4%), respectively. The pooled DOR was 58.84 (95% CI, 32.39-106.88; I = 51.9%). The AUC was 0.9371. According to Deek funnel plot asymmetry test, there was no significant publication bias (P = .31).

CONCLUSIONS

The results yielded from the available evidence suggest that CEUS is a promising and adjuvant imaging technique to conventional ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gallbladder lesions.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder lesion

AIM

To describe contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features and evaluate differential diagnosis value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound for patients with benign and malignant gallbladder lesions.

METHODS

This study included 105 gallbladder lesions. Before surgical resection and pathological examination, conventional ultrasound and CEUS were performed to examine for lesions. Then, all the lesions were diagnosed as (1) benign, (2) probably benign, (3) probably malignant or (4) malignant using both conventional ultrasound and CEUS. The CEUS features of these gallbladder lesions were analyzed and diagnostic efficiency between conventional ultrasound and CEUS was compared.

RESULTS

There were total 17 cases of gallbladder cancer and 88 cases of benign lesion. Some gallbladder lesions had typical characteristics on CEUS (e.g., gallbladder adenomyomatosis had typical characteristics of small nonenhanced areas on CEUS). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CEUS were 94.1%, 95.5%, 80.0%, 98.8% and 95.2%, respectively. These were significantly higher than conventional ultrasound (82.4%, 89.8%, 60.9%, 96.3% and 88.6%, respectively). CEUS had an accuracy of 100% for gallbladder sludge and CEUS helped in differential diagnosis among gallbladder polyps, gallbladder adenoma and gallbladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

CEUS may provide more useful information and improve the diagnosis efficiency for the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions than conventional ultrasound.

Diagnostic nomogram for gallbladder wall thickening mimicking malignancy: using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography or multi-detector computed tomography?

OBJECTIVES

To establish a diagnostic nomogram using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in gallbladder wall thickening mimicking malignancy and compare with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with gallbladder wall thickening on B-mode ultrasonography (BUS) were examined by CEUS to develop independent predictors for diagnosing gallbladder carcinoma. Among the 72 cases, 48 patients underwent both CEUS and MDCT. The diagnostic performances of different sets of CEUS criteria and MDCT were compared. A prediction model of malignancy using CEUS was developed. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression indicated that inhomogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase was the strongest independent predictor of malignancy (odds ratio, OR 51.162), followed by interrupted inner layer (OR 19.788), washout time ≤40 s (OR 16.686), and wall thickness >1.6 cm (OR 3.019), which were all selected into the nomogram. Combined with the above significant features, the diagnostic performance of CEUS (AUC = 0.917) was higher than that of MDCT (AUC = 0.788, P = 0.070). The predictive model using CEUS showed good discrimination, with a concordance index of 0.974 (0.950 through internal validation), and good calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS could accurately differentiate between malignant and benign gallbladder wall thickening with equivalent efficacy compared to MDCT. The proposed nomogram could be conveniently used to facilitate the preoperative individualized prediction of malignancy in patients with gallbladder wall thickening.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in gallbladder cancer and pancreatic cancer

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) plays a major role in diagnosing gallbladder (GB) cancer and pancreatic cancer (PC). In cases of GB cancer, EUS allows for precise observations of morphology and wall layers. However, proficiency is required for the morphologic diagnosis of GB tumors. Therefore, contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) began to be performed to diagnose GB lesions. CH-EUS enables real-time observation of the hemodynamics of GB tumors. The enhanced patterns generated by CH-EUS improve precision in the diagnosis of such tumors.PC appears as a hypoechoic mass on EUS. However, distinguishing between PC and mass-forming pancreatitis or focal autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is difficult via conventional EUS. CH-EUS allows for differentiating among these diseases (PC is hypoenhanced and heterogeneously enhanced, pancreatitis is isoenhanced, and a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor is hyperenhanced). EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) also contributes to pathological diagnoses of pancreatic lesions. However, certain PC patients cannot be diagnosed via EUS-FNA. PC is heterogeneously enhanced on CH-EUS, and unenhanced regions have been reported to be areas of fibrosis or necrosis. CH-EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (CH-EUS-FNA) permits puncturing of the enhanced area while avoiding necrotic and fibrotic regions. Moreover, as CH-EUS findings have been quantitatively analyzed, a time-intensity curve (TIC) has become usable for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. CH-EUS-related techniques have been developed and increasingly utilized in the pancreaticobiliary area.

Risk factors for gallbladder contractility after cholecystolithotomy in elderly high-risk surgical patients

OBJECTIVE

Cholecystolithiasis is a common disease in the elderly patient. The routine therapy is open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the previous study, we designed a minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy based on percutaneous cholecystostomy combined with a choledochoscope (PCCLC) under local anesthesia.

METHODS

To investigate the effect of PCCLC on the gallbladder contractility function, PCCLC and laparoscope combined with a choledochoscope were compared in this study.

RESULTS

The preoperational age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, as well as postoperational lithotrity rate and common biliary duct stone rate in the PCCLC group, were significantly higher than the choledochoscope group. However, the pre- and postoperational gallbladder ejection fraction was not significantly different. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that the preoperational thickness of gallbladder wall (odds ratio [OR]: 0.540; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.317-0.920; P=0.023) and lithotrity (OR: 0.150; 95% CI: 0.023-0.965; P=0.046) were risk factors for postoperational gallbladder ejection fraction. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.714 (P=0.016; 95% CI: 0.553-0.854).

CONCLUSION

PCCLC strategy should be carried out cautiously. First, restricted by the diameter of the drainage tube, the PCCLC should be used only for small gallstones in high-risk surgical patients. Second, the usage of lithotrity should be strictly limited to avoid undermining the gallbladder contractility and increasing the risk of secondary common bile duct stones.