Cryoablation as Primary Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer Followed by Penile Rehabilitation

Cryosurgery would be An Effective Option for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Cryosurgery (CS) has been used on patients with clinically localized PCa for more than 10 years. However, clinical studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety have reported conflicting results. This systematic assessment was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of CS compared with those of radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP), respectively. All controlled trials comparing CS with RT or RP and single-arm studies reporting results of CS therapy were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Ten publications from seven trials, with totally 1252 patients, were included in the meta-analysis, which revealed no significant differences in comparisons of CS vs RT and CS vs RP for overall survival and disease specific survival. However, a significantly lower disease-free survival could be observed for CS than RP. Moreover, a systematic review of literature focusing on comparative data of databases and materials of single-arm trials revealed satisfactory survival results in both primary and salvage CS. Our results showed that cryosurgery would be a relatively effective method for clinically localized prostate cancer with survival results comparable to radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. However, the large percentage of complications caused by cryosurgery should be carefully monitored.

In-situ administration of dendritic cells following argon-helium cryosurgery enhances specific antiglioma immunity in mice

Dendritic cells (DCs) are highly specialized antigen-presenting cells that play a key role in the activation of naive T cells. With an aim to explore whether in-situ administration of DCs following argon-helium cryosurgery could enhance specific antiglioma immunity in mice, we evaluated the validity of this approach in a murine subcutaneous GL261 glioma model. C57BL/6 mice models bearing subcutaneous GL261 glioma were established and then divided into four groups, namely, no-treatment group (n=14), DC group (n=14), cryosurgery group (n=15), and cryosurgery+DC group (n=15). Compared with the other groups, cryosurgery combined with DCs injection reduced tumor sizes and significantly prolonged survival. In addition, the combined treatment resulted in significantly increasing percentages of CD3, CD3CD4 cells, the ratio of CD3CD4/CD3CD8, and the level of serum interleukin-12 10 days after treatments. Furthermore, in the combined treatment group, Th1 cells were significantly higher than those in the other groups, and the splenic cytotoxic T lymphocyte of mice showed significantly increasing specific cytotoxicity against GL261 cells. These results indicated that in addition to the destruction of tumor, cryosurgery combined with DCs injection enhanced systemic antitumor immunity, suggesting the potential usefulness of the combined treatment in the clinical management of gliomas.

Surgical management of prostate cancer

Surgery remains a mainstay in the management of localized prostate cancer. This article addresses surgical aspects germane to the management of men with prostate cancer, including patient selection for surgery, nerve-sparing approaches, minimization of positive surgical margins, and indications for pelvic lymph node dissection. Outcomes for men with high-risk prostate cancer following surgery are reviewed, and the present role of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy is discussed. In addition, there is a review of the published literature on surgical ablative therapies for prostate cancer.

Primary Zonal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Phase IIa Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

To present the results of a prospective phase IIa study assessing the role of primary zonal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for prostate cancer treatment.

METHODS

31 consecutive patients with unilateral organ confined prostate cancer primarily treated by zonal HIFU (from February 2007 to June 2011) were recruited into a single centre prospective phase IIa feasibility study. Complications were prospectively recorded and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo score. Postoperatively, patients were followed with serial serum PSA determinations and digital rectal examinations. An individual PSA nadir was identified in each patient. Followup also included whole gland biopsies performed in the event of a PSA rising>2.0 ng/mL above nadir value (Phoenix criteria).

RESULTS

At a median followup of 38 months, biochemical recurrence free survival was 100%, 89%, and 82.7% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, with overall and cancer specific survival of 100%. The procedure was safe and well tolerated with no major adverse events. All patients were continent at their last followup and 55.2% (16/29) had erectile function sufficient for penetration.

CONCLUSION

Primary zonal HIFU is a valid focal therapy strategy, safe and feasible in day to day practice with good promising results [corrected].

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: rationale and treatment opportunities

Focal therapy is an emerging treatment modality for localised prostate cancer that aims to reduce the morbidity seen with radical therapy, while maintaining cancer control. Focal therapy treatment strategies minimise damage to non-cancerous tissue, with priority given to the sparing of key structures such as the neurovascular bundles, external sphincter, bladder neck and rectum. There are a number of ablative technologies that can deliver energy to destroy cancer cells as part of a focal therapy strategy. The most widely investigated are cryotherapy and high-intensity focussed ultrasound. Existing radical therapies, such as brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy, also have the potential to be applied in a focal manner. The functional outcomes of focal therapy from several phase I and II trials have been encouraging, with low rates of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Robust medium- and long-term cancer control outcomes are currently lacking. Controversies in focal therapy remain, notably treatment paradigms based on the index lesion hypothesis, appropriate patient selection for focal therapy and how the efficacy of focal therapy should be assessed. This review articles discusses the current status of focal therapy, highlighting controversies and emerging strategies that can influence treatment outcomes for the future.

The role of targeted focal therapy in the management of low-risk prostate cancer: update on current challenges

Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers among men in the United States, second only to nonmelanomatous skin cancer. Since prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing came into widespread use in the late 1980s, there has been a sharp increase in annual prostate cancer incidence. Cancer-specific mortality, though, is relatively low. The majority of these cancers will not progress to mortal disease, yet most men who are diagnosed opt for treatment as opposed to observation or active surveillance (AS). These men are thus burdened with the morbidities associated with aggressive treatments, commonly incontinence and erectile dysfunction, without receiving a mortality benefit. It is therefore necessary to both continue investigating outcomes associated with AS and to develop less invasive techniques for those who desire treatment but without the significant potential for quality-of-life side effects seen with aggressive modalities. The goals of this paper are to discuss the problems of overdiagnosis and overtreatment since the advent of PSA screening as well as the potential for targeted focal therapy (TFT) to bridge the gap between AS and definitive therapies. Furthermore, patient selection criteria for TFT, costs, side effects, and brachytherapy template-guided three-dimensional mapping biopsies (3DMB) for tumor localization will also be explored.

Initial brazilian experience in the treatment of localized prostate cancer using a new generation cryotechnology: feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The objective of our study is to present the first Brazilian cryoablation experience in the treatment of low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer using 3rd generation cryoablation and real-time biplanar transrectal ultrasonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten Brazilian patients underwent primary cryoablation for localized prostate cancer between October 2010 and June 2011. All patients consented for whole gland primary cryotherapy. The procedures were performed by 3rd generation cryoablation with the Cryocare System ® (Endocare, Irvine, California). Preoperative data collection included patient demographics along with prostate gland size, Gleason score, serum prostate specific antigen, and erectile function status. Operative and post--operative assessment involved estimated blood loss, operative time, complications, serum PSA level, erectile function status, urinary incontinence, biochemical disease free survival (BDFS), and follow-up time.

RESULTS

All patients in the study successfully underwent whole gland cryoablation. The mean of: age, prostate size, PSA level, and Gleason score, was 66.2 years old; 40.7 g; 7.8 ng/mL; and 6 respectively. All patients were classified as low or moderate D' Amico risk (5 low and 5 moderate). Erectile dysfunction was present in 50% of patients. The estimated blood loss was minimal, operative time was 46.1 minutes. All patients that developed erectile dysfunction post-treatment responded to oral or intracavernosal medications with early penile rehabilitation. All patients maintained urinary continence by the end of a 10 months evaluation period and none had biochemical relapse within the mean follow-up of 13 months (7-15 months).

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience shows that cryoablation is a minimally invasive option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Short term data seems to be promising but longer follow-up is necessary to verify oncological and functional results.

Focal therapy in the management of prostate cancer: an emerging approach for localized prostate cancer

A widespread screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has led increased diagnosis of localized prostate cancer along with a reduction in the proportion of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. Over the past decade, interest in focal therapy as a less morbid option for the treatment of localized low-risk prostate cancer has recently been renewed due to downward stage migration. Focal therapy stands midway between active surveillance and radical treatments, combining minimal morbidity with cancer control. Several techniques of focal therapy have potential for isolated ablation of a tumor focus with sparing of uninvolved surround tissue demonstrating excellent short-term cancer control and a favorable patient's quality of life. However, to date, tissue ablation has mostly used for near-whole prostate gland ablation without taking advantage of accompanying the technological capabilities. The available ablative technologies include cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP). Despite the interest in focal therapy, this technology has not yet been a well-established procedure nor provided sufficient data, because of the lack of randomized trial comparing the efficacy and morbidity of the standard treatment options. In this paper we briefly summarize the recent data regarding focal therapy for prostate cancer and these new therapeutic modalities.

Prostate cryoablation in patients with multiple-component inflatable penile prostheses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and assess any inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP)-related complications in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer treated definitively with third-generation, ultrasound-guided prostate cryoablation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From November 2003 to October 2010, we identified 100 consecutive patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer who were treated with targeted cryoablation as primary or salvage therapy by a single surgeon. Review of these patients revealed 13 who had previously been diagnosed with organic erectile dysfunction and had been implanted with a multiple-component IPP by the same surgeon. To assess IPP complications related to the cryoablation procedure, we retrospectively reviewed events occurring within a 6-month postoperative follow-up period.

RESULTS

For the entire series, the patient ages ranged from 42-84 years (mean 68). Of the 13 patients with IPPs, no device-related complication (eg, IPP infection, erosion, or malfunction) was found. No patient required IPP revision or removal.

CONCLUSION

Patients with organ-confined prostate cancer who also have a multiple-component IPP may safely undergo ultrasound-guided prostate cryoablation as definitive therapy. Cryoprobe and thermocouple placement must be carried out carefully, using ultrasound guidance. To avoid IPP reservoir injury, suprapubic tube placement should be avoided.

Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To present the early results of the use of third-generation cryotherapy as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer in China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2009, 102 patients underwent primary cryosurgery for clinically localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent a dual freeze-thaw cycle using third-generation cryotechnology with ultrathin 17-gauge cryoneedles.

RESULTS

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level for all patients at the last follow-up visit was less than 0.5 ng/ml in 94 patients (92.2%) and 0.5 ng/ml or more in 8 (7.8%). One patient (1.0%) had recurrent prostate cancer confirmed by prostate biopsy and was treated with salvage cryotherapy. Seven other patients (6.9%) had an elevated PSA level after cryotherapy despite negative posttreatment biopsies and a metastatic evaluation. Of 102 patients, 1 patient was incontinent preoperatively. Of the remaining 101 patients, 4 patients (4.0%) developed mild incontinence requiring 1 to 2 pads per day. Urethral sloughing occurred in 5 of the 102 patients (4.9%) and in 1 of these patients (1.0%) required transurethral resection of sloughing. The rates of erectile dysfunction were 64.1%. No urethral strictures, rectourethral fistulas, urinary retention, or chronic pelvic pain was reported. The median inpatient stay after cryoablation was 3.2 days.

CONCLUSION

Early results suggest that cryotherapy offers a safe and effective alternative for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Additional studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the sustained efficacy of this procedure.

Comparison of penile size and erectile function after high-intensity focused ultrasound and targeted cryoablation for localized prostate cancer: a prospective pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) represents a common quality-of-life issue of any treatment used for prostate cancer, including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and targeted cryoablation of the prostate (TCAP). There is a paucity of comparative studies regarding the difference in the erectile function and penile size of patients undergoing HIFU or TCAP.

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare the erectile function and penile size of patients undergoing HIFU or TCAP.

METHODS

Patients with a preoperative erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) score ≥ 26 were prospectively included. All patients were preoperatively evaluated by IIEF-EF and penile color Doppler ultrasound. Penile length and circumference were measured in flaccidity and at maximum erection. At 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months after surgery, patients were assessed with the same protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

IIEF-EF score, penile color Doppler ultrasound, penile length, and circumference at different time points.

RESULTS

There were 55 patients in the HIFU group and 47 in the TCAP group. At each time point, there were significant differences in mean IIEF-EF scores and penile color Doppler results between the two groups. At 36 months, TCAP patients experienced lower erectile function recovery rate compared with HIFU patients (TCAP=46.8%; HIFU=65.5%; P=0.021). No significant decreases in penile length and circumference were found in the two groups (all P values ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate TCAP caused significantly decreased erectile function than HIFU. We found no change in penile size after HIFU or TCAP. The option of HIFU may be more attractive to the patient who wants to avoid ED afterward, to maintain their quality of life.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: fact or fiction?

Prostate cancer is the commonest male cancer diagnosed in men in the UK, and the treatment of organ confined prostate cancer is a subject of much debate. Focal therapy for prostate cancer intends to treat the cancer within the prostate, whilst sparing the majority of the benign prostate tissue. In addition, the intention is to avoid treatment effects in the surrounding structures, the damage of which leads to the side effects commonly associated with radical whole gland therapies. This relies on accurate localization of the prostate cancer by biopsy and imaging followed by treatment using a modality capable of delivery to a focal area within the prostate. Focal therapy lies between the current extremes of radical whole gland treatment and active surveillance. There have been many articles reviewing the concept of focal therapy for organ confined prostate cancer, but with a paucity of data available for analysis. This is being addressed with an increase in the published data on focal therapy, using a number of different modalities. In this review, we address the question of whether the data currently published does in fact support the further development of the focal therapy approach, or whether it is a concept best relegated to the realms of fiction.

Minimally invasive ablative therapies for definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer in the primary setting

Traditionally, the patient with a new diagnosis of localized prostate cancer faces either radical therapy, in the form of surgery or radiation, or active surveillance. A growing subset of these men may not be willing to accept the psychological burden of active surveillance nor the side effects of extirpative or radiation therapy. Local ablative therapies including cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy have emerged as a means for minimally invasive definitive treatment. These treatments are well tolerated with decreased morbidity in association with improvements in technology; however, long-term oncologic efficacy remains to be determined.

Contemporary analysis of erectile, voiding, and oncologic outcomes following primary targeted cryoablation of the prostate for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate erectile function (EF) and voiding function following primary targeted cryoablation of the prostate (TCAP) for clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) in a contemporary cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated between 2/2000-5/2006 with primary TCAP. Variables included age, Gleason sum, pre-TCAP prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, clinical stage, pre-TCAP hormonal ablation, pre-TCAP EF and American Urologic Association Symptom Score (AUASS). EF was recorded as follows: 1 = potent; 2 = sufficient for intercourse; 3 = partial/insufficient; 4 = minimal/insufficient; 5 = none. Voiding function was analyzed by comparing pre/post-TCAP AUASS. Statistical analysis utilized SAS software with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 78 consecutive patients were analyzed with a mean age of 69.2 years and follow-up 39.8 months. Thirty-five (44.9%) men reported pre-TCAP EF level of 1-2. Post-TCAP, 9 of 35 (25.7%) regained EF of level 1-2 while 1 (2.9%) achieved level 3 EF. Median pre-TCAP AUASS was 8.75 versus 7.50 postoperatively (p = 0.39). Six patients (7.7%) experienced post-TCAP urinary incontinence. Lower pre-TCAP PSA (p = 0.008) and higher Gleason sum (p = 0.002) were associated with higher post-TCAP AUASS while prostate volume demonstrated a trend (p = 0.07). Post-TCAP EF and stable AUASS were not associated with increased disease-recurrence (p = 0.24 and p = 0.67, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Stable voiding function was observed post-TCAP, with an overall incontinence rate of 7.7%. Further, though erectile dysfunction is common following TCAP, 25.7% of previously potent patients demonstrated erections suitable for intercourse. While long-term data is requisite, consideration should be made for prospective evaluation of penile rehabilitation following primary TCAP.

Primary cryoablation for Gleason 8, 9, or 10 localized prostate cancer: Biochemical and local control outcomes from the Cryo OnLine database registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The increased use of cryoablation as an initial treatment for localized high-grade prostate cancer has been due to many factors including reports that cell kill from exposure to cryogenic temperatures is independent of cellular dedifferentiation and Gleason score. The objective of this study is to report the outcomes of primary cryoablation when used to treat Gleason 8, 9, or 10 localized prostate cancer at a large number of centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 1608 patients who underwent primary cryoablation at 27 centers were collected using the Cryo OnLine Database (COLD) registry. This analysis considers only the 77 patients who had a Gleason score of at least 8 and a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. Biochemical failure was defined according to both the original ASTRO definition (three rises) and the 2006 updated ASTRO (Phoenix) definition of nadir + 2. Biopsy was performed at the physician's discretion, but most commonly if a patient had a rising or suspicious prostate specific antigen (PSA).

RESULTS

The average age at treatment was 69.6 +/- 8.2 years. Pretreatment PSA was 16.2 +/- 17.9 ng/ml and the average Gleason was 8.5 +/- 0.6. Patients were followed for 39.0 +/- 18.8 months (range: 24-120 months) and 5-year follow-up was available for 12 patients. Eight-seven percent of the patients achieved a PSA nadir < 0.4 ng/ml. Five-year actuarial biochemical survivals was 64.4 +/- 6.0% and 44.6 +/- 8.0% for the ASTRO and Phoenix definitions, respectively. A total of 47 underwent posttreatment biopsy. Of these, 12 showed evidence of disease resulting in a positive biopsy rate for those who underwent biopsy of 25.5%. This yields a positive biopsy rate of the entire population of 15.6% (12/77).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoablation, as a primary treatment for high-grade Gleason prostate cancer practiced over a wide spectrum of users provides definable biochemical and local control for a hard to manage patient population with aggressive disease.

Focal or subtotal therapy for early stage prostate cancer

Focal treatment for prostate cancer is highly intriguing, but poorly supported by the published literature. Further studies, preferably randomized controlled trials, are needed before this can be considered standard therapy. Focal treatment should be reserved for patients with focal disease. Even "clinically insignificant" synchronous tumors are malignant, and carry risk of progression if not treated with the index lesion. Whether these are likely to progress in this setting compared to those managed with active surveillance is unknown. The limited data regarding subtotal or focal cryotherapy suggest that patients properly evaluated for presence of satellite tumors have a low risk of having large unknown satellite tumors. The author requires office-based saturation biopsy prior to considering focal cryotherapy. Observation of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), atypical findings (ASAP), or cancer on the contralateral biopsy cores excludes the patient from consideration of subtotal therapy. MRI offers a potential additional ability to detect occult contralateral tumors. Younger men paradoxically seem to have greater interest in focal therapy while having a higher risk of future malignancy in the untreated areas based on the years of potential risk. However, no age cutoff is established. Without published data to support its use, lumpectomy or freezing only the focus where cancer is believed to exist, will remain limited. Hemispheric or subtotal treatment decreases the amount of untreated tissue. As a result, the local failure rate would be predicted to be lower but is unknown. When performing subtotal treatment, the author freezes almost the entire gland, sparing only the aspect adjacent to the contralateral neurovascular bundle, and has found this practice to be of highly limited utility based on the issues described. Biopsy should be performed following any treatment that fails to target the entire gland. A positive biopsy should be dealt with based on clinical factors as if the patient had not been treated, and a positive biopsy should not preclude active surveillance if deemed appropriate.

The current use and future trends of focal surgical therapy in the management of localized prostate cancer

The current treatment algorithms for management of localized prostate cancer are mainly extirpative in nature. Treatment varies from expectant management to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. However, the ever-increasing emphasis on achieving the best survival benefit while better preserving quality of life, coupled with the introduction of new, safer, and efficacious minimally invasive ablative technologies, has led to the increased popularity of minimally invasive treatment (MIT). MIT refers to the use of a wide range of techniques for local target ablation of the prostate gland with minimal damage to the surrounding tissue. Currently these include cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound. However, other experimental technologies such as photodynamic therapy, interstitial prostate brachytherapy, and microwave and radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation are also currently under investigation in early clinical trials. To date, the overall interim results for these relatively new modalities of treatment appear comparable to those for surgical and radiation therapies. However, randomized, controlled studies are needed to support use of these modalities as an alternative to surgery and radiation. In this review, we will address the current rationale for and knowledge of MIT with regard to its safety and efficacy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In addition, we will discuss future promising tools in MIT such as photodynamic therapy and the target focal therapy approach as a new trend for the treatment of organ-confined low-volume disease.