1
|
Mayor N, Eldred-Evans D, Tam H, Sokhi H, Padhani AR, Connor MJ, Price D, Gammon M, Klimowska-Nassar N, Burak P, Day E, Winkler M, Fiorentino F, Shah T, Ahmed HU. Prostagram magnetic resonance imaging in a screening population: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or Likert? BJU Int 2024; 133:112-117. [PMID: 37591614 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare biopsy recommendation rates and accuracy of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2) with the Likert scale for detection of clinically significant and insignificant prostate cancer in men screened within the Imperial Prostate 1 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial Using Imaging (IP1-PROSTAGRAM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Men aged 50-69 years were screened with Prostagram MRI. Scans were prospectively reported using both PI-RADSv2 (excluding dynamic contrast-enhanced sequence score) and 5-point Likert scores by expert uro-radiologists. Systematic and targeted transperineal biopsy was recommended if the scan was scored ≥ 3, based on either reporting system. The proportion of patients recommended for biopsy and detection rates for Grade Groups (GGs) 1 and ≥ 2 were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare performance. RESULTS A total of 406 men underwent Prostagram MRI. The median (interquartile range) age and prostate-specific antigen level were 57 (53-61) years and 0.91 (0.56-1.74) ng/mL, respectively. At MRI score ≥ 3, more patients were recommended for biopsy based on Likert criteria (94/406; 23%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.2%-27.6%) compared to PI-RADSv2 (72/406; 18%, 95% CI 14.2%-21.9%; P = 0.03). For MRI scores ≥ 4, PI-RADSv2 and Likert scales led to 43/406 (11%, 95% CI 7.9%-14.1%) and 35/406 (9%, 95% CI 6.2%-11.9%) men recommended for biopsy (P = 0.40). For GG ≥ 2 detection, PIRADSv2 and Likert detected 22% (95% CI 11.4%-30.8%, 14/72) and 16% (95% CI 9.5%-25.3%, 15/94), respectively (P = 0.56). For GG1 cancers detection these were 11% (95% CI 4.3%-19.6%, seven of 72) vs 11% (95% CI 4.7%-17.8%, nine of 94; P = 1.00). The accuracy of PI-RADSv2 and Likert scale was similar (area under the ROC curve 0.64 vs 0.65, P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS In reporting non-contrast-enhanced Prostagram MRI in a screening population, the PI-RADSv2 and Likert scoring systems were equally accurate; however, Likert scale use led to more men undergoing biopsy without a subsequent increase in significant cancer detection rates. To improve reporting of Prostagram MRI, either the PI-RADSv2 or a modified Likert scale or a standalone scoring system should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Mayor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - David Eldred-Evans
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Henry Tam
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Heminder Sokhi
- Department of Radiology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Martin J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Derek Price
- Public and Patient Representative, Solihull, UK
| | | | - Natalia Klimowska-Nassar
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paula Burak
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Day
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesca Fiorentino
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division of Methodologies and Nightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit (King's Clinical Trials Unit), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Taimur Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Islam MR, Biswas S, Mowla SGM, Banik GC, Ahmed HU, Rahim A, Tanveer T, Amin MR, Azad KAK. Mental Health Assessment of Health Care Providers of Bangladesh during Covid-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Study. Mymensingh Med J 2024; 33:247-253. [PMID: 38163800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
SARS COV 2 raised immense agony to everyone. As health care workers remains direct contact with patients, they are vulnerable to mental health disorder. The study was done to identify mental health status of health care providers of Bangladesh. It was a cross sectional web based survey among health care providers of bangladesh. A structured web based questionnaire was prepared both in Bangla and English version for better understanding. Total 2594 health care workers responded to online survey. Male were 1303(50.2%) and female were 1291(49.8%). Occupational demography shows 98.5% were physicians. Mean value of patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ9) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were 8.43±6.082 and 8.27±5.234 respectively among healthcare providers. To overcome anxiety and depression, 93.4% of HCW didn't receive any psychological material and 85.6% HCW didn't find physiological resources even through media. Despite many lacking, healthcare workers were resilient in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Islam
- Professor Mohammad Rafiqul Islam, Professor of Medicine, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Merriel SWD, Archer S, Forster AS, Eldred-Evans D, McGrath J, Ahmed HU, Hamilton W, Walter FM. Experiences of 'traditional' and 'one-stop' MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England: a qualitative study with patients and GPs. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054045. [PMID: 35882453 PMCID: PMC9330318 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to understand and explore patient and general practitioner (GP) experiences of 'traditional' and 'one-stop' prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, analysed using inductive thematic analysis SETTING: Patients were recruited from National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in London and in Devon; GPs were recruited via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Networks. Interviews were conducted in person or via telephone. PARTICIPANTS Patients who had undergone a MRI scan of the prostate as part of their diagnostic work-up for possible prostate cancer, and GPs who had referred at least one patient for possible prostate cancer in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS 22 patients (aged 47-80 years) and 10 GPs (6 female, aged 38-58 years) were interviewed. Patients described three key themes: cancer beliefs in relation to patient's attitudes towards prostate cancer;communication with their GP and specialist having a significant impact on experience of the pathway and pathway experience being influenced by appointment and test burden. GP interview themes included: the challenges of dealing with imperfect information in the current pathway; managing uncertainty in identifying patients with possible prostate cancer and sharing this uncertainty with them, and other social, cultural and personal contextual influences. CONCLUSIONS Patients and GPs reported a range of experiences and views of the current prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England. Patients valued 'one-stop' pathways integrating prostate MRI and diagnostic consultations with specialists over the more traditional approach of several hospital appointments. GPs remain uncertain how best to identify patients needing referral for urgent prostate cancer testing due to the lack of accurate triage and risk assessment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alice S Forster
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - John McGrath
- Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Willie Hamilton
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reddy D, Dudderidge T, Shah T, McCracken S, Arya M, Fiorentino F, Day E, Prevost A, Emberton M, Staffurth J, Sandhu S, Hindley R, Arumainayagam N, Sydes MR, Khoo V, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Comparative healthcare research outcomes of novel Surgery in prostate cancer (IP4-CHRONOS): Pilot RCT assessing feasibility of randomization for focal therapy in localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5086 Background: Randomised comparative data is lacking for focal therapy in localised prostate cancer. Imperial Prostate 4 CHRONOS (IP4- CHRONOS) is an RCT designed to reflect patient and physician equipoise to maximise acceptance to randomisation. Methods: Patients and physicians could opt for CHRONOS-A or CHRONOS-B. CHRONOS-A randomised between focal therapy (HIFU/cryotherapy) and radical therapy (radiation/prostatectomy). Using a multi-arm-multistage design, CHRONOS-B randomised between focal and focal combined with neoadjuvant medication (3 months of either finasteride or bicalutamide). We report the pilot phase outcomes on feasibility of randomisation. IP4-CHRONOS had ethics committee approval and was registered (ISRCTN17796995). Results: Due to impact of COVID-19, the target for CHRONOS-A was modified from 60 to 36; 36 patients were randomised over 24 months from 7 sites (Nov/2019-Nov/2021). CHRONOS-B randomised 64 patients over 14 months across 6 sites (Dec/2019-Feb/2021). Median (IQR) age and PSA (ng/ml) for CHRONOS-A were 69 (65-72) years and 6 (5-7) and for 66 (60.5-70) years and 6 (4-7) for CHRONOS-B, respectively. 34/36 (94%) and 60/64 (94%) had ISUP Grade Group > / = 2, respectively. 4/18 (22%) randomised to radical in CHRONOS-A withdrew consent; 1/22 (5%) randomised to focal withdrew. In CHRONOS-B, only 1/21 (5%) randomised to focal alone, and another randomised to focal with neoadjuvant bicalutamide withdrew. A qualitative recruitment intervention partially improved accrual to CHRONOS-A. Conclusions: IP4-CHRONOS evaluated patient and physician equipoise regarding focal therapy. Randomising between focal and radical therapy is not feasible due to strong patient preferences. A multi-arm, multi-stage RCT investigating the role of neoadjuvant agents combined with focal therapy is feasible. Clinical trial information: 17796995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Manit Arya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Emily Day
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nim Arumainayagam
- Department of Urology, Ashford and St Peters Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Syed SE, Khan NM, Ahmed HU. Emotional and Behavioural Changes in Children and Adolescents and Their Association With Parental Depression During COVID-19 Pandemic: a Pilot Study in Bangladesh. East Asian Arch Psychiatry 2022; 32:11-16. [PMID: 35332105 DOI: 10.12809/eaap2138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mental health of children, adolescents, and their parents. This study aimed to assess the emotional and behavioural changes in children and adolescents and their association with parental depression during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. METHODS On 7 May 2020 during COVID-19 lockdown, an online questionnaire was distributed through social media and made available for 10 days. Data were collected from parents of children aged 4 to 17 years. The Bangla version of the parent-rated version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was used to determine the behavioural and emotional disturbances of the children and adolescents. The Bangla version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess the depression status of parents. RESULTS There were 512 participants. 21.5% of children and adolescents had emotional and behavioural problems. More boys than girls had abnormal peer relationship problems (21.1% vs 15.4%, p = 0.03). Of the parents, 16.2% had moderate depression, 5.5% moderately severe depression, and 2.9% severe depression. 8.2% and 2.9% of parents reported that it was very difficult and extremely difficult, respectively, to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people; the proportion was higher in mothers than fathers (χ2 = 11.4, df = 3, p = 0.01). The PHQ-9 total score of parents mildly correlated with the SDQ score of children and adolescents (r = 0.51, p = 0.01). In multiple linear regression, a combination of parent sex (β = 0.08, p < 0.001), child's history of developmental/psychiatric problems (β = 0.02, p = 0.67), and the SDQ total score of children and adolescents (β = 0.52, p = 0.03) accounted for 27% of the variability in PHQ total score of parents. CONCLUSION During lockdown, the prevalence of psychiatric disorder among children and adolescents and their parents increased. The depression status of parents mildly correlated with the behavioural and emotional disturbances of children and adolescents. We recommend opening the schools as soon as the situation improves and developing interventions such as virtual mental health assessment for children and adolescents and their parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E Syed
- Department of Psychiatry, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - N M Khan
- National Institute of Mental Health, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - H U Ahmed
- National Institute of Mental Health, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Connor MJ, Genie MG, Gonzalez M, Sarwar N, Thippu Jayaprakash K, Horan G, Hosking-Jervis F, Klimowska-Nassar N, Sukumar J, Pokrovska T, Basak D, Robinson A, Beresford M, Rai B, Mangar S, Khoo V, Dudderidge T, Falconer A, Winkler M, Watson V, Ahmed HU. Metastatic prostate cancer men's attitudes towards treatment of the local tumour and metastasis evaluative research (IP5-MATTER): protocol for a prospective, multicentre discrete choice experiment study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048996. [PMID: 34794989 PMCID: PMC8603288 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensification with agents such as docetaxel, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide has resulted in improved overall survival in men with de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Novel local cytoreductive treatments and metastasis-directed therapy are now being evaluated. Such interventions may provide added survival benefit or delay the requirement for further systemic agents and associated toxicity but can confer additional harm. Understanding men's preferences for treatment options in this disease state is crucial for patients, clinicians, carers and future healthcare service providers. METHODS Using a prospective, multicentre discrete choice experiment (DCE), we aim to determine the attributes associated with treatment that are most important to men with mHSPC. Furthermore, we plan to determine men's preferences for, and trade-offs between, the attributes (survival and side effects) of different treatment options including systemic therapy, local cytoreductive approaches (external beam radiotherapy, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy or minimally invasive ablative therapy) and metastases-directed therapies (metastasectomy or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy). All men with newly diagnosed mHSPC within 4 months of commencing ADT and WHO performance status 0-2 are eligible. Men who have previously consented to a cytoreductive treatment or have developed castrate-resistant disease will be excluded. This study includes a qualitative analysis component, with patients (n=15) and healthcare professionals (n=5), to identify and define the key attributes associated with treatment options that would warrant trade-off evaluation in a DCE. The main phase component planned recruitment is 300 patients over 1 year, commencing in January 2021, with planned study completion in March 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Authority East of England, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 20/EE/0194). Project information will be reported on the publicly available Imperial College London website and the Heath Economics Research Unit (HERU website including the HERU Blog). We will use the social media accounts of IP5-MATTER, Imperial Prostate London, HERU and the individual researchers to disseminate key findings following publication. Findings from the study will be presented at national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Authorship policy will follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04590976.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin John Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Divison of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mesfin G Genie
- Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), Faculty of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Economics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venezia, Italy
| | - Michael Gonzalez
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Naveed Sarwar
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kamalram Thippu Jayaprakash
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn, UK
| | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Feargus Hosking-Jervis
- Imperial Prostate, Divison of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Natalia Klimowska-Nassar
- Imperial Prostate, Divison of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit (ICTU), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Johanna Sukumar
- Imperial Prostate, Divison of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit (ICTU), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tzveta Pokrovska
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Dolan Basak
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Angus Robinson
- Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Mark Beresford
- Department of Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Bhavan Rai
- Department of Urology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Mangar
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Alison Falconer
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Divison of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Verity Watson
- Health Economics Research Unit (HERU), Faculty of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Divison of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bass EJ, Pantovic A, Connor MJ, Loeb S, Rastinehad AR, Winkler M, Gabe R, Ahmed HU. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 25:174-179. [PMID: 34548624 PMCID: PMC9184263 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00449-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Multiparametric MRI localizes cancer in the prostate, allowing for MRI guided biopsy (MRI-GB) 43 alongside transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-GB). Three MRI-GB approaches exist; visual estimation (COG-TB); fusion software-assisted (FUS-TB) and MRI ‘in-bore’ biopsy (IB-TB). It is unknown whether any of these are superior. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to address three questions. First, whether MRI-GB is superior to TRUS-GB at detecting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Second, whether MRI-GB is superior to TRUS-GB at avoiding detection of insignificant PCa. Third, whether any MRI-GB strategy is superior at detecting csPCa. Methods A systematic literature review from 2015 to 2019 was performed in accordance with the START recommendations. Studies reporting PCa detection rates, employing MRI-GB and TRUS-GB were included and evaluated using the QUADAS-2 checklist. 1553 studies were found, of which 43 were included in the meta-analysis. Results For csPCa, MRI-GB was superior in detection to TRUS-GB (0.83 vs. 0.63 [p = 0.02]). MRI-GB was superior in detection to TRUS-GB at avoiding detection of insignificant PCa. No MRI-GB technique was superior at detecting csPCa (IB-TB 0.87; COG TB 0.81; FUS-TB 0.81, [p = 0.55]). There was significant heterogeneity observed between the included studies. Conclusions In patients with suspected PCa on MRI, MRI-GB offers superior rates of csPCa detection and reduces detection of insignificant PCa compared to TRUS-GB. No individual MRI-GB technique was found to be better in csPCa detection. Prospective adequately powered randomized controlled trials are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Bass
- Imperial Prostate. Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - A Pantovic
- Centre of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research -, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M J Connor
- Imperial Prostate. Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | - A R Rastinehad
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital at Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate. Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate. Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bass EJ, Pantovic A, Connor M, Gabe R, Padhani AR, Rockall A, Sokhi H, Tam H, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2021; 24:596-611. [PMID: 33219368 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00298-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), the use of three multiple imaging sequences, typically T2-weighted, diffusion weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images, has a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant cancer. Current guidance now recommends its use prior to biopsy. However, the impact of DCE is currently under debate regarding test accuracy. Biparametric MRI (bpMRI), using only T2 and DWI has been proposed as a viable alternative. We conducted a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis to further examine the diagnostic performance of bpMRI in the diagnosis of any and clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the literature from 01/01/2017 to 06/07/2019 was performed by two independent reviewers using predefined search criteria. The index test was biparametric MRI and the reference standard whole-mount prostatectomy or prostate biopsy. Quality of included studies was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. Statistical analysis included pooled diagnostic performance (sensitivity; specificity; AUC), meta-regression of possible covariates and head-to-head comparisons of bpMRI and mpMRI where both were performed in the same study. RESULTS Forty-four articles were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity for any cancer detection was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), specificity 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81) for bpMRI. The summary ROC curve yielded a high AUC value (AUC = 0.86). The pooled sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93), specificity 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.84) and the AUC value was 0.87. Meta-regression analysis revealed no difference in the pooled diagnostic estimates between bpMRI and mpMRI. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis on contemporary studies shows that bpMRI offers comparable test accuracies to mpMRI in detecting prostate cancer. These data are broadly supportive of the bpMRI approach but heterogeneity does not allow definitive recommendations to be made. There is a need for prospective multicentre studies of bpMRI in biopsy naïve men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Bass
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - A Pantovic
- Centre of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - M Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - R Gabe
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - A Rockall
- Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer,Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - H Sokhi
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Tam
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bass EJ, Klimowska-Nassar N, Sasikaran T, Day E, Fiorentino F, Sydes MR, Winkler M, Arumainayagam N, Khoubehi B, Pope A, Sokhi H, Dudderidge T, Ahmed HU. PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: The IP3-PROSPECT study. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 107:106485. [PMID: 34139356 PMCID: PMC8451266 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The traditional double blind RCT is the ‘gold standard’ trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer. Patients and methods IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort. Results Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT. Conclusion The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Bass
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - N Klimowska-Nassar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T Sasikaran
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - E Day
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - F Fiorentino
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - N Arumainayagam
- Department of Urology, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St. Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, UK
| | - B Khoubehi
- Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Pope
- Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK
| | - H Sokhi
- Department of Radiology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK
| | - T Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Division of Cancer, Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mangar S, Mondal S, Edwards S, Ahmed HU, Wassersug RJ, Falconer A, Iles R, Dimitriou D. Evaluating the prevalence and nature of sleep disturbances in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy using a combination of actigraphy and sleep questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e17046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e17046 Background: Sleep disturbances and cancer related fatigue are commonly associated. Prostate cancer patients may suffer from disturbed sleep as a result of their diagnosis and following treatment, especially with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Wrist actigraphy is a non-invasive objective method of sleep data collection. This feasibility study compares sleep data obtained by actigraphy with subjective data from sleep questionnaires in order to determine the nature and severity of sleep disturbances in patients with and without ADT use. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 74 patients with prostate cancer attending a regional oncology clinic. Two validated subjective sleep questionnaires namely the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] were used. Patients wore actigraphy watches for a minimum of five consecutive days. The parameters of interest included: actual sleep time, sleep efficiency, fragmentation index, daytime napping frequency and duration. The questionnaire and actigraphy data were compared between 20 patients receiving ADT and 41 who were treatment-naive. Results: The compliance rate for completed actigraphy was 85%. Complete data sets with actigraphy and questionnaires were available from 61 patients. Those already receiving ADT were on LHRH analogues for a median duration of 2.35 years. Poor sleep quality as self-identified by patients from the PSQI (cut-off > 5) was 49% in the treatment-naive group which increased to 70% for those on ADT. For daytime sleepiness as assessed by ESS (cut-off > 10) this was 16% and 20% respectively. Actigraphy showed that patients on ADT reported longer sleep duration (7.4 vs 6.5 hours, p = 0.02), higher levels of nocturnal wakings (51.1% vs 36.7%, p = 0.002), with greater daytime napping duration (80.7mins vs 53.0mins, p = 0.04), and frequency (8.6 vs 5.6, p = 0.02) compared to treatment-naive patients. Conclusions: Self-reported poor sleep quality is common in prostate cancer patients, which appears worse for those receiving ADT. In patients receiving ADT, data derived from actigraphy suggests that although they were sleeping for longer at night, the quality of sleep was poor which, in turn, may be responsible for an increase in the frequency and duration of daytime napping. Based on the current findings, we recommend the use of actigraphy to characterise patients’ sleep patterns and to assess if sleep treatment is needed. Actigraphic data may allow for direct comparisons of different hormonal agents on sleep whilst identifying those with specific sleep disorders amenable to therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Mangar
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Alison Falconer
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ray Iles
- National Institutes for Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and Behavioural Change, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shah TT, Kanthabalan A, Pavlou M, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Haroon A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Arya M, Payne HA, Mitra A, Horan G, Moore C, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU. MRI and targeted biopsies compared to transperineal mapping biopsies for targeted ablation in recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: Primary outcomes of the FORECAST trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5009 Background: Radiotherapy is a common and effective treatment for localised prostate cancer. However, recurrence of cancer can occur in 10-15% of men in the following 5 years. Most patients with recurrence are managed using hormonal therapy with associated systemic side-effects and subsequent development of castrate resistance. Salvage prostatectomy confers a high risk of urine incontinence and rectal injury. Accurately localising and ablating only areas of recurrence within the prostate might be effective with fewer side-effects. The FOcal RECurrent Assessment and Salvage Treatment (FORECAST) trial assessed this diagnostic and treatment pathway for men with radiorecurrent cancer (NCT01883128). Methods: We first compared the accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI) and MRI-targeted biopsy in identifying areas of recurrent cancer to a transperineal template prostate mapping (TTPM) biopsy (Apr/2014-Jan/2018) in 181 patients from 6 UK centres. We then assessed the functional and cancer control outcomes of focally ablating areas of intraprostatic recurrence in 93 patients with localised or metastatic cancer (using cryotherapy or HIFU). Primary outcomes were sensitivity of mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsies and urinary continence after focal ablation. A key secondary outcome was progression free survival (PFS) defined as no new metastases or hormone use (localised group only), or chemotherapy or further local treatment. Results: Of 181 men with suspicion of recurrence following radiotherapy, re-staging whole-body imaging (Choline PET and Bone Scan) showed localised disease in 128 (71%), nodal disease only in 13 (7%) and 38 (21%) metastatic. The sensitivity of MRI-targeted biopsy was 92% (95%CI 83-97%). Specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, were 75% (95%CI 45-92%), 94% (95%CI 86-98%) and 65% (95%CI 38-86%). 4/72 (6%) cancers were missed on TTPM biopsies alone and 6/72 (8%) were missed on MRI-targeted biopsies alone. Overall sensitivity of mpMRI was 81% (95%CI 73-88%) using Likert score 4-5 to denote a positive test. Specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, were 88% (95%CI 73-98%), 96% (95%CI 90-99%) and 57% (95%CI 42-70%). In the 93 men undergoing focal ablation, urinary continence was preserved in 78/93 (84%); 5/93 (5%) had a CTCAE grade 3+ adverse events. There were no rectal injuries. With a median follow-up of 27.8 [SD 1.3] months, PFS was 66% [54-75] at 24-months. Metastases-free survival in the 73 men with localised disease was 80% [95%CI 68–88] at 24-months. There were no cancer specific deaths. Conclusions: Prostate mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsies can accurately detect and localise recurrent prostate cancer following radiotherapy. Focal ablation to areas of intra-prostatic recurrence preserves continence in the majority of men with good cancer control. Clinical trial information: NCT01883128.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sola Adeleke
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Athar Haroon
- Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harbir Sidhu
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Freeman
- University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Basingstoke Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Manit Arya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Ann Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London and University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Mitra
- Department of Oncology, University College London and University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kings Lynn, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Grey A, Scott R, Shah B, Acher P, Liyanage S, Pavlou M, Omar R, Chinegwundoh F, Patki P, Campbell D, Shah TT, Hamid S, Brew-Graves C, Arumainayagam N, Chapman A, Eldred-Evans D, Freeman A, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. The CADMUS trial: A paired cohort, blinded study comparing multiparametric ultrasound targeted biopsies with multiparametric MRI targeted biopsies in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5008 Background: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate followed by targeted biopsy is recommended in men at risk of prostate cancer. Dissemination of this pathway may be limited by cost, variable scan and reporting quality, and contraindicated in the presence of metallic implants and claustrophobia. Multi-parametric ultrasound (mpUSS) is a point of care test with low cost that combines b-mode, colour Doppler, elastography and contrast enhancement. CADMUS compared the diagnostic performance of mpUSS to mpMRI. Methods: CADMUS recruited 370 patients from seven sites to a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort trial (ISRCTN 38541912). Ethics committee approval was obtained. Patients underwent both mpUSS and mpMRI independently, each with a positive test defined as a Likert score of >3. Those with either a positive mpUSS or mpMRI, or both, were advised to undergo targeted biopsies. Reporting of each scan was carried out blind to the other and prior to biopsy; patients advised for biopsy were blinded to which test was positive. The order of mpUSS and mpMRI targeting was randomised. Primary outcomes were proportion of positive tests and detection of clinically significant cancer (csPCa) defined as Gleason >4+3 of any length and/or maximum cancer core length of >6mm of any grade [PROMIS definition1]. Results: 306 completed both mpUSS and mpMRI. Agreement in lesion detection between mpUSS and mpMRI was 73.2% (kappa 0.06, p = 0.14). 257 with positive results on mpUSS, mpMRI or both had targeted biopsies. Agreement on detection of csPCa was 91.1% (expected 59.8%, kappa 0.78, p < 0.01). Overall, mpUSS detected 4.3% fewer csPCa than mpMRI (95% CI = [-8.3%, -1.5%]; p = 0.042 [Bonferroni correction]). mpUSS detected 7.2% (6/83) csPCa missed by mpMRI; mpMRI detected 20.5% (17/83) csPCa that mpUSS missed. At a less stringent definition of significant cancer, Gleason grade >3+4 of any length (definition 3), agreement was 89.1% (expected 55.6%, kappa 0.75, p < 0.01) mpUSS detected 5.4% fewer definition 3 cancers than mpMRI overall. mpUSS detected 7% (7/99) definition 3 cancers that mpMRI missed; mpMRI detected 21% (21/99) definition 3 cancers that mpUSS missed. Conclusions: The CADMUS trial shows mpUSS has a diagnostic performance approaching that of mpMRI and significant cancer detection is improved by the use of both scans over mpMRI alone. Clinical trial information: 38541912. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bina Shah
- Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Acher
- Southend University Hospital, Southend, United Kingdom
| | - Sidath Liyanage
- Department of Radiology, Southend University Hospital, Southend, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rumana Omar
- University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Prasad Patki
- Barts and the Royal London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sami Hamid
- Department of Urology, The Whittington Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nim Arumainayagam
- Department of Urology, Ashford and St Peters Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Chapman
- Department of Radiology, Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alex Freeman
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bertoncelli Tanaka M, St John ER, Exarchos G, Hogben K, Ahmed HU, Hrouda D. Safety and adverse events of urgent elective surgery during COVID-19 within three UK hospitals. Br J Surg 2021; 108:e51-e52. [PMID: 33640929 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This is a cohort study including 283 patients who underwent breast and urological procedures in three UK centres during the peak of COVID-19. COVID-related 30-day mortality was zero, as well as COVID-related admissions. Only 12 patients developed COVID-19 symptoms, although none had a positive COVID swab. Non-emergency surgery for breast and urological conditions was safe during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, provided contemporaneous safety measures were followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bertoncelli Tanaka
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - E R St John
- Department of Breast Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Academic Surgical Unit, Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - G Exarchos
- Department of Breast Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - K Hogben
- Department of Breast Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - D Hrouda
- Imperial Urology, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Cancer and Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Connor MJ, Shah TT, Smigielska K, Day E, Sukumar J, Fiorentino F, Sarwar N, Gonzalez M, Falconer A, Klimowska-Nassar N, Evans M, Naismith OF, Thippu Jayaprakash K, Price D, Gayadeen S, Basak D, Horan G, McGrath J, Sheehan D, Kumar M, Ibrahim A, Brock C, Pearson RA, Anyamene N, Heath C, Shergill I, Rai B, Hellawell G, McCracken S, Khoubehi B, Mangar S, Khoo V, Dudderidge T, Staffurth JN, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Additional Treatments to the Local tumour for metastatic prostate cancer-Assessment of Novel Treatment Algorithms (IP2-ATLANTA): protocol for a multicentre, phase II randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042953. [PMID: 33632752 PMCID: PMC7908915 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival in men diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic prostate cancer has increased following the use of upfront systemic treatment, using chemotherapy and other novel androgen receptor targeted agents, in addition to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Local cytoreductive and metastasis-directed interventions are hypothesised to confer additional survival benefit. In this setting, IP2-ATLANTA will explore progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes with the addition of sequential multimodal local and metastasis-directed treatments compared with standard care alone. METHODS A phase II, prospective, multicentre, three-arm randomised controlled trial incorporating an embedded feasibility pilot. All men with new histologically diagnosed, hormone-sensitive, metastatic prostate cancer, within 4 months of commencing ADT and of performance status 0 to 2 are eligible. Patients will be randomised to Control (standard of care (SOC)) OR Intervention 1 (minimally invasive ablative therapy to prostate±pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND)) OR Intervention 2 (cytoreductive radical prostatectomy±PLND OR prostate radiotherapy±pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT)). Metastatic burden will be prespecified using the Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease (CHAARTED) definition. Men with low burden disease in intervention arms are eligible for metastasis-directed therapy, in the form of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) or surgery. Standard systemic therapy will be administered in all arms with ADT±upfront systemic chemotherapy or androgen receptor agents. Patients will be followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. PRIMARY OUTCOME PFS. Secondary outcomes include predictive factors for PFS and overall survival; urinary, sexual and rectal side effects. Embedded feasibility sample size is 80, with 918 patients required in the main phase II component. Study recruitment commenced in April 2019, with planned follow-up completed by April 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) Research Ethics Committee Wales-5 (19/WA0005). Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03763253; ISCRTN58401737.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin John Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Taimur Tariq Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Katarzyna Smigielska
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Day
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Johanna Sukumar
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Naveed Sarwar
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Gonzalez
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Falconer
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Klimowska-Nassar
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martin Evans
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Frances Naismith
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Derek Price
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Shiva Gayadeen
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Dolan Basak
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - John McGrath
- Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Denise Sheehan
- Department of Oncology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Manal Kumar
- Department of Urology, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - Azman Ibrahim
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, Wirral, UK
| | - Cathryn Brock
- Department of Oncology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel A Pearson
- Department of Oncology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicola Anyamene
- Department of Oncology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Catherine Heath
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Iqbal Shergill
- Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
| | - Bhavan Rai
- Department of Urology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Giles Hellawell
- Department of Urology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Stuart McCracken
- Department of Urology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
| | - Bijan Khoubehi
- Department of Urology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Mangar
- Department of Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John Nicholas Staffurth
- Research, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Connor MJ, Eldred-Evans D, van Son M, Hosking-Jervis F, Bertoncelli Tanaka M, Reddy D, Bass EJ, Powell L, Ahmad S, Pegers E, Joshi S, Sri D, Wong K, Tam H, Hrouda D, Qazi H, Gordon S, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. A Multicenter Study of the Clinical Utility of Nontargeted Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsies in Patients Undergoing Pre-Biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Urol 2020; 204:1195-1201. [PMID: 32516029 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The added value of nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies when performed alongside magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies in men referred with a suspicion of prostate cancer is unclear. We aimed to determine the clinical utility of transperineal nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies, when performed alongside targeted systematic prostate biopsies, using pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients referred with a suspicion of prostate cancer (April 2017 to October 2019) underwent pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. A transperineal biopsy was advised if multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging PI-RADS® (v.2.0) score was 4 or 5, and score 3 required a prostate specific antigen density 0.12 ng/ml or greater. Primary threshold for clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as any Gleason 3+4 or greater. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified pre-biopsy predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer in nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies, regardless of targeted pathology (p <0.05, R, version 3.5.1). RESULTS A total of 1,719 men underwent a pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, with 679 (39.5%) proceeding to combined targeted systematic prostate biopsies and nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies. In these men clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 333 (49%) and 139 (20.5%) with targeted systematic prostate biopsies and nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies, respectively. In those men with clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted systematic prostate biopsies, clinically significant prostate cancer was also present in nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies in 117 (17.2%); Gleason 3+3 was present in 50 (7.4%). In 287 men without any cancer in the targeted systematic prostate biopsies, 13 (1.9%) had clinically significant prostate cancer in nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies. In addition 18/679 (2.7%) had Gleason 3+3 disease and no Gleason greater than 4+3 was detected. Predictors associated with clinically significant prostate cancer in nontargeted systematic prostate biopsies were prostate specific antigen 5 ng/ml or greater (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.13-3.73, p=0.02), PI-RADS score 5 (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.51-3.38, p <0.001) and prostate volume less than 50 cc (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.57-3.87, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in exclusively nontargeted transperineal systematic biopsies in a pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging pathway was low (1.9%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Eldred-Evans
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M van Son
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Hosking-Jervis
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Bertoncelli Tanaka
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Reddy
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - E J Bass
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Powell
- Department of Urology, St. George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Ahmad
- Department of Urology, Epsom and St. Helier's University Hospital Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - E Pegers
- RM Partners, West London Cancer Alliance, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Joshi
- RM Partners, West London Cancer Alliance, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Sri
- Department of Urology, St. George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Wong
- Department of Urology, Epsom and St. Helier's University Hospital Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - H Tam
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D Hrouda
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H Qazi
- Department of Urology, St. George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Gordon
- Department of Urology, Epsom and St. Helier's University Hospital Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanthabalan A, Arya M, Freeman A, Mitra AV, Payne H, Peters M, Shah TT, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Intraprostatic Cancer Recurrence following Radical Radiotherapy on Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsy: Implications for Focal Ablative Salvage Therapy. J Urol 2020; 204:950-955. [PMID: 32602770 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Men in whom external beam radiotherapy fails are usually placed on delayed hormone therapy. Some of these men have localized recurrence that might be suitable for further local therapy. We describe patterns of recurrence and suitability for focal ablative therapy in those undergoing transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 145 consecutive patients (December 2007 to May 2014) referred with suspicion of recurrence due to rising prostate specific antigen after external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy who underwent transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies. Suitability for focal ablative therapy required the cancer to be unifocal or unilateral, or bilateral/multifocal with 1 dominant index lesion and secondary lesions with Gleason score 3+3=6 with no more than 3 mm cancer core involvement. RESULTS Mean patient age was 70.7 (SD 5.8) years. Median prostate specific antigen at time of transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy was 4.5 ng/ml (IQR 2.5-7.7). Overall 75.9% (110) were suitable for a form of focal salvage treatment, 40.7% (59) were suitable for quadrant ablation, 14.5% (21) hemiablation, 14.5% (21) bilateral focal ablation and 6.2% (9) for index lesion ablation. CONCLUSIONS Three-quarters of patients who have localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer may be suitable for focal ablative therapy to the prostate based on transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kanthabalan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Arya
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A V Mitra
- Department of Clinical Oncology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - H Payne
- Department of Clinical Oncology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Edison MA, Connor MJ, Miah S, El-Husseiny T, Winkler M, Dasgupta R, Ahmed HU, Hrouda D. Understanding virtual urology clinics: a systematic review. BJU Int 2020; 126:536-546. [PMID: 32463991 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a systematic review to identify the clinical, fiscal and environmental evidence on the use of urological telehealth and/or virtual clinic (VC) strategies, and to highlight research gaps in this rapidly evolving field. METHODS Our PROSPERO-registered (CRD42019151946) systematic search of Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Review Database was performed to identify original research articles pertaining to adult urology telehealth or VC strategies. Risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment was performed according to the Cochrane 2.0 RoB tool or the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for non-randomized studies. RESULTS A total of 5813 participants were included from 18 original articles (two randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 10 prospective studies, six retrospective studies). Urology sub-specialities comprised: uro-oncology (n = 6); general urology (n = 8); endo-urology (n = 2); and lower urinary tract symptoms and/or incontinence (n = 2). Across all sub-specialties, prospective studies using VCs reported a primary median (interquartile range [IQR]) VC discharge rate of 16.6 (14.7-29.8)% and a primary median (IQR) face-to-face (FTF) clinic referral rate of 32.4 (15.5-53.3)%. Direct cost analysis demonstrated median (IQR) annual cost savings of £56 232 (£46 260-£61 116). Grade II and IIIb complications were reported in two acute ureteric colic studies, with rates of 0.20% (3/1534) and 0.13% (2/1534), respectively. The annual carbon footprint avoided ranged from 0.7 to 4.35 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions, depending on the mode of transport used. Patient satisfaction was inconsistently reported, and assessments lacked prospective evaluation using validated questionnaires. CONCLUSION Urology VCs are a promising new platform which can offer clinical, financial and environmental benefits to support an increasing urological referral burden. Further prospective evidence is required across urological sub-specialties to confirm equivalency and safety against traditional FTF assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Alexandra Edison
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Martin John Connor
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Imperial Prostate I Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saiful Miah
- Department of Urology, Wycombe Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Amersham, UK
| | - Tamer El-Husseiny
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Imperial Prostate I Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ranan Dasgupta
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Imperial Prostate I Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Hrouda
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Connor MJ, Shah TT, Sukumar J, Naismith OF, Day E, Fiorentino F, Falconer A, Sarwar N, Gonzalez M, Gayadeen S, Jayaprakash KT, McGrath J, Horan G, Heath C, Mangar S, Khoo V, Dudderidge T, Staffurth JN, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Initial experience of the adjuvant treatments to the local tumor for metastatic prostate cancer: Assessment of novel treatment algorithms, a multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial (IP2-ATLANTA). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps5600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS5600 Background: Local cytoreductive and metastasis-directed interventions are hypothesised to confer additional survival benefit beyond standard systemic therapy in patients with de novo synchronous metastatic prostate cancer. There is accumulating prospective evidence for local cytoreductive therapy. In particular, the phase III study STAMPEDE which demonstrated improved overall survival in a low burden subgroup of men following cytoreductive radiotherapy. Cytoreductive prostatectomy and minimally invasive ablative therapies (MIAT) are now subject to similar trial evaluation. IP2-ATLANTA will evaluate progression-free and overall survival outcomes with the addition of sequential multi-modal local and metastasis-directed treatments in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer compared to standard care alone. Methods: Phase II, multicentre, three-arm randomised controlled trial using a positive comparator arm ( n=918 ). An internal pilot ( n=80) feasibility phase is incorporated. All men with new histologically diagnosed, hormone sensitive, metastatic prostate cancer, within three months of commencing ADT and of PS 0-2 are eligible. Patients are randomised (1:1:1) to: Control (Standard of Care) OR Intervention 1 (Minimally invasive ablative therapy to the prostate +/- pelvic lymph node dissection [PLND]) OR Intervention 2 (prostate radiotherapy +/- lymph nodes OR Radical prostatectomy +/- PLND). Metastatic burden pre-specified by CHAARTED definition. Men with low-burden disease in intervention arms are eligible for metastasis-directed therapy (stereotactic ablative radiotherapy [SABR] or surgery). Standard systemic therapy given in all arms (incl. docetaxel). Follow-up: min. 2-years; max. 4 years. Primary outcome: progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes: Overall survival; urinary, sexual & rectal side-effects; patient reported outcome measures. HRA ethical approval (Ref: 19/WA0005). To date, 28/80 (35%) patients have been recruited and randomised across 9 open sites in the internal pilot. Median recruitment rate is 85.7% (IQR 55–86). Internal pilot recruitment expected to be complete by April 2020. IP2-ATLANTA addresses an important research gap in the role of local and metastasis-directed therapy in men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03763253 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Johanna Sukumar
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Frances Naismith
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Day
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alison Falconer
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naveed Sarwar
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Shiva Gayadeen
- West Middlesex University Hospital (WMUH), London, United Kingdom
| | | | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Horan
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Heath
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Mangar
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eldred-Evans D, Burak P, Connor MJ, Day E, Evans M, Fiorentino F, Gammon M, Hosking-Jervis F, Klimowska- Nassar N, McGuire W, Padhani AR, Price D, Prevost T, Sokhi H, Tam H, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Population-based prostate cancer screening using a prospective, blinded, paired screen-positive comparison of PSA and fast MRI: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5513 Background: The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test can lead to under- and over-diagnosis of prostate cancer and has not been recommended for population screening. A fast MRI scan might overcome the limitations of PSA. IP1-PROSTAGRAM is the first study to evaluate the performance of a 15-minute non-contrast MRI for prostate cancer screening in comparison to PSA. Methods: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, population-based, screen-positive paired-cohort study. Men aged 50-69 years in the UK were invited for prostate cancer screening through seven primary care practices or community-based recruitment. Participants underwent a PSA and MRI scan (T2-weighted and diffusion). MRI was scored using PIRADS version 2.0 without knowledge of PSA; screen-positive MRI (defined as either PIRADS score 3-5 or 4-5) were compared against a screen-positive PSA defined as ≥3ng/ml. If any test was screen-positive, a systematic 12-core biopsy was performed with MRI-ultrasound image-fusion targeted biopsy to MRI suspicious areas, as appropriate. Clinically-significant cancer was defined as any Gleason score ≥3+4. The primary outcome was the proportion of screen-positive MRI at different scores; important secondary outcomes were the number of clinically-significant and insignificant cancers detected. Results: 2034 men were invited to participate of whom 408 consented and 406 were screened by both PSA and MRI (10/Oct/2018-15/May/2019). The proportion with a screen-positive MRI (score 3-5) was higher than the proportion with a screen-positive PSA (17.7% [95%CI 14.3-21.8] vs. 9.9% [95%CI 7.3-13.2]; p < 0.001). A screen-positive MRI (score 4-5) was similar to a screen-positive PSA (10.6% [95%CI 7.9-14.0] vs. 9.9% [95%CI 7.3-13.2], p = 0.71). An MRI score 3-5 or 4-5 used to denote a screen-positive MRI, compared to PSA alone, detected 14, 11 and 7 clinically-significant cancers, respectively. There were 7, 5 and 6 clinically-insignificant cancers detected, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: When screening the general population for prostate cancer, MRI using a score of 4-5 to define a screen-positive test, compared to PSA alone at ≥3ng/ml, could lead to more men diagnosed with clinically-significant cancer without increasing the number of men biopsied or diagnosed with clinically-insignificant cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03702439 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Burak
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Emily Day
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Martin Gammon
- Imperial Prostate, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - William McGuire
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Price
- Imperial Prostate, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Toby Prevost
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heminder Sokhi
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Henry Tam
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reddy D, Shah TT, van Son M, Guillaumier S, Hosking-Jervis F, Dudderidge T, McCracken S, Nigam R, Hindley R, McCartan N, Afzal N, Lewi H, Persad R, Virdi J, Orczyk C, Moore C, Arya M, Emberton M, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Oncological outcomes of 356 patients undergoing salvage focal ablative HIFU or cryotherapy following radiation failure. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5582 Background: Patients that have previously failed radiotherapy for prostate cancer is usually limited to systemic therapy due to morbidity from salvage prostatectomy. We reviewed the outcomes following focal salvage ablative therapy with HIFU or cryotherapy within the UK’s HEAT and ICE registries. Methods: 356 consecutive patients underwent focal ablative treatment after initial radiation treatment failure (28/1/2004-1/10/2019, 194 (54.5%) underwent HIFU (posterior recurrence) and 162 (45.5%) underwent cryotherapy (mostly anterior or T3b). Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) defined as no systemic therapy, whole-gland treatment, metastases or prostate cancer-specific death. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and overall survival. Results: Median (IQR) age was 69years (65-73) and PSA (IQR) was 4.0ng/ml (1-7-7.2). Overall median (IQR) follow-up was 41.3 months (21.4-58.5). Quadrant ablation was performed in 128 (36.0%), hemi-ablation performed in 64 (18.0%), hockey-stick in 5 (1.4%) and 159 (43.8%) had unknown ablative patterns. Due to histological or MRI proven recurrence/residual disease, 31 (8.7%) underwent further focal salvage re-treatment. FFS (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 81% (76-87%) and 75% (68-83%) respectively. Median (IQR) time to failure was 15.5 months (19.7). Overall survival (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 97% (95-100%) and 88% (81-96%) respectively. Prostate-specific mortality was 2.8%. Overall 3 (0.8%) patients were managed for fistula formation, 16 (4.5%) were treated for UTIs. Conclusions: Salvage focal ablative therapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer is safe and provides good short to medium-term oncological control. The FORECAST study is awaited to further determine oncological outcomes in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Raj Nigam
- University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naveed Afzal
- Dorset County Hampshire NHS Trust, Dorchester, United Kingdom
| | - Henry Lewi
- Springfield Hospital, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Persad
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jaspal Virdi
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Manit Arya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jayaram A, Goh G, Kularatne BY, Waterhouse J, Shanmugabavan Y, Rowan A, Wong YNS, Freeman A, Akarca A, Herrero J, Rosenthal R, McGranahan N, Hung M, Emberton M, Attard G, Quezada SA, Marafioti T, Ahmed HU, Swanton C, Linch MD. Intratumoural (IT) evolutionary landscape of high-risk prostate cancer and outcome: The PROGENY (PROstate cancer GENomic heterogeneitY) study of genomic and immune parameters. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e17500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e17500 Background: IT heterogeneity (ITH) is well recognised in prostate cancer (PC), but its role in high-risk disease and patient outcomes are uncertain. Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, translational study using targeted multi-region prostate biopsies to study genomic and T-cell ITH in clinically high-risk PC aiming to identify drivers and potential therapeutic strategies. A pre-defined exploratory objective was to evaluate the association of ITH, median inflammatory infiltrate (MII), total, clonal and neoantigens, with overall survival (OS) and time-to-next-line of therapy (TTNL). Results: 49 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected PC underwent image-guided multiregion transperineal biopsy. 79 tumour regions from 25 patients (pts) with PC underwent sequencing, analysis of mutations, copy number and neoepitopes combined with tumour infiltrating T-cell subset quantification. The median follow-up was 60 months (m) with 10 death events. For %ITH, MII, total, clonal and subclonal neoantigens, patients were split by the median. Conclusions: The PROGENY study provides a diagnostic platform suitable for studying tumour ITH and has the potential to identify poor outcome subgroups in PC. Larger sample numbers in prospective trials are warranted to further investigate this hypothesis. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuradha Jayaram
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Rowan
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yien Ning Sophia Wong
- Cancer Immunology Unit, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Freeman
- University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ayse Akarca
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rachel Rosenthal
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas McGranahan
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Hung
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gerhardt Attard
- Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Sergio A. Quezada
- Cancer Immunology Unit, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Teresa Marafioti
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark David Linch
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Noureldin M, Eldred-Evans D, Khoo CC, Winkler M, Sokhi H, Tam H, Ahmed HU. Review article: MRI-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis and management. World J Urol 2020; 39:57-63. [PMID: 32253585 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy has been the traditional biopsy route in the detection of prostate cancer. However, due to concern regarding overdetection of low-risk cancer and missed clinically significant cancers as well as risk of sepsis, alternative approaches have been explored. Transperineal template biopsy-sampling the gland every 5 m to 10 mm-reduces error by sampling the whole prostate but increases risk of detecting clinically insignificant cancers as well as conferring risks of side effects such as urinary retention and bleeding. METHODS There are various targeted biopsy techniques, each with different cancer detection rates, costs and learning curves. Current research focuses on refining biopsy methodology to maximize detection of significant cancers, whilst minimising invasiveness and complications. In this article, the up-to-date research data about MRI-targeted prostate biopsy were reviewed to show its utilization in prostate cancer management and diagnosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Prostate multiparametric MRI has become an effective tool in the detection of significant cancers and an essential component of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway incorporating MRI-guided biopsy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Noureldin
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. .,Urology Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - D Eldred-Evans
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C C Khoo
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H Sokhi
- Department of Radiology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - H Tam
- Department of Radiology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Connor MJ, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Cytoreductive cryotherapy for newly diagnosed oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:537-538. [PMID: 32076122 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0216-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.
| | - M Winkler
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Connor MJ, Gorin MA, Ahmed HU, Nigam R. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer in the era of routine multi-parametric MRI. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:232-243. [PMID: 32051551 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0206-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer focal therapy aims to minimize the side-effects of whole gland treatments, such as radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy without compromising oncological efficacy. However, concerns exist regarding the multifocal nature of prostate cancer and the lack of long-term oncological data for this form of treatment. In recent years, the routine adoption of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has improved our ability to select candidates for focal therapy and to accurately deliver this form of prostate cancer treatment. METHODS We performed a review of the literature to provide a summary of the oncological and functional outcomes of men receiving primary prostate focal therapy. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of the routine implementation of mpMRI as part of the initial prostate cancer diagnostic pathway on the selection of candidates and delivery of focal therapy. Finally, we summarize knowledge gaps in the field and highlight active clinical trials in this arena. RESULTS Primary focal therapy involves the application of one of a number of energies that ablate tissue, such as cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Success is principally dependent on highly accurate patient selection and disease localization underpinned in large part by the routine integration of pre-biopsy mpMRI. Prospective medium-term follow-up data for primary HIFU and cryotherapy for men with intermediate-risk disease have shown acceptable cancer control with low risk of side effects and complications. Additional research is needed to clearly define an appropriate follow-up approach and to guide the management of in- and out-of-field recurrences. Multiple comparative trials with randomization against standard care are currently underway in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The widespread adoption of prostate mpMRI has led to improved disease localization, enabling the performance of focal therapy as a viable treatment strategy for men with low volume intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.
| | - M A Gorin
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - R Nigam
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, UK.,University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Adeleke S, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Galazi M, Shah TT, Clemente J, Davda R, Payne HA, Chouhan MD, Lioumi M, Chua S, Freeman A, Rodriguez-Justo M, Coolen A, Vadgama S, Morris S, Cook GJ, Bomanji J, Arya M, Chowdhury S, Wan S, Haroon A, Ng T, Ahmed HU, Punwani S. Localising occult prostate cancer metastasis with advanced imaging techniques (LOCATE trial): a prospective cohort, observational diagnostic accuracy trial investigating whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in radio-recurrent prostate cancer. BMC Med Imaging 2019; 19:90. [PMID: 31730466 PMCID: PMC6858718 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-019-0380-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate whole-body staging following biochemical relapse in prostate cancer is vital in determining the optimum disease management. Current imaging guidelines recommend various imaging platforms such as computed tomography (CT), Technetium 99 m (99mTc) bone scan and 18F-choline and recently 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) for the evaluation of the extent of disease. Such approach requires multiple hospital attendances and can be time and resource intensive. Recently, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has been used in a single visit scanning session for several malignancies, including prostate cancer, with promising results, providing similar accuracy compared to the combined conventional imaging techniques. The LOCATE trial aims to investigate the application of WB-MRI for re-staging of patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) following external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS/DESIGN The LOCATE trial is a prospective cohort, multi-centre, non-randomised, diagnostic accuracy study comparing WB-MRI and conventional imaging. Eligible patients will undergo WB-MRI in addition to conventional imaging investigations at the time of BCR and will be asked to attend a second WB-MRI exam, 12-months following the initial scan. WB-MRI results will be compared to an enhanced reference standard comprising all the initial, follow-up imaging and non-imaging investigations. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity analysis) of WB-MRI for re-staging of BCR will be investigated against the enhanced reference standard on a per-patient basis. An economic analysis of WB-MRI compared to conventional imaging pathways will be performed to inform the cost-effectiveness of the WB-MRI imaging pathway. Additionally, an exploratory sub-study will be performed on blood samples and exosome-derived human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) dimer measurements will be taken to investigate its significance in this cohort. DISCUSSION The LOCATE trial will compare WB-MRI versus the conventional imaging pathway including its cost-effectiveness, therefore informing the most accurate and efficient imaging pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION LOCATE trial was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov on 18th of October 2016 with registration reference number NCT02935816.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sola Adeleke
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd floor Charles Bell house, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS UK
| | - Arash Latifoltojar
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd floor Charles Bell house, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS UK
| | - Harbir Sidhu
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd floor Charles Bell house, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital, London, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Myria Galazi
- Molecular Oncology Group, University College London, Cancer Institute, Paul O’Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6DD UK
| | - Taimur T. Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 4th floor, 21 University Street, London, WC1E UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Joey Clemente
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd floor Charles Bell house, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS UK
| | - Reena Davda
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Heather Ann Payne
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Manil D. Chouhan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd floor Charles Bell house, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital, London, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Maria Lioumi
- Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre (CCIC), King’s College, London, New Hunt’s House, Guy’s Campus, London, SE1 1UL UK
| | - Sue Chua
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Down’s Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Histopathology Department, University College London Hospital, 4th Floor, Rockefeller Building University Street, London, WC1 6DE UK
| | - Manuel Rodriguez-Justo
- Histopathology Department, University College London Hospital, 4th Floor, Rockefeller Building University Street, London, WC1 6DE UK
| | - Anthony Coolen
- Institute for Mathematical and Molecular Biomedicine, King’s College London, Hodgkin Building, Guy’s Campus, London, SE1 1UL UK
| | - Sachin Vadgama
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Fitzrovia, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Steve Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Fitzrovia, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Gary J. Cook
- Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, 5th Floor Tower, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Urology Department, University College Hospital, Westmoreland Street, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, W1G 8PH UK
| | - Simon Chowdhury
- Oncology Department, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge road, Lambeth, London, SE1 7EH UK
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, 5th Floor Tower, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE UK
| | - Tony Ng
- Molecular Oncology Group, University College London, Cancer Institute, Paul O’Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6DD UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Urology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 2nd floor Charles Bell house, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital, London, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Johnston EW, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu HS, Ramachandran N, Sokolska M, Bainbridge A, Moore C, Ahmed HU, Punwani S. Multiparametric whole-body 3.0-T MRI in newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement for nodal and metastatic staging. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:3159-3169. [PMID: 30519933 PMCID: PMC6510859 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5813-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver concordance of whole-body (WB)-MRI, vs. 99mTc bone scintigraphy (BS) and 18fluoro-ethyl-choline (18F-choline) PET/CT for the primary staging of intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS An institutional review board approved prospective cohort study carried out between July 2012 and November 2015, whereby 56 men prospectively underwent 3.0-T multiparametric (mp)-WB-MRI in addition to BS (all patients) ± 18F-choline PET/CT (33 patients). MRI comprised pre- and post-contrast modified Dixon (mDixon), T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Patients underwent follow-up mp-WB-MRI at 1 year to derive the reference standard. WB-MRIs were reviewed by two radiologists applying a 6-point scale and a locked sequential read (LSR) paradigm for the suspicion of nodal (N) and metastatic disease (M1a and M1b). RESULTS The mean sensitivity/specificity of WB-MRI for N1 disease was 1.00/0.96 respectively, compared with 1.00/0.82 for 18F-choline PET/CT. The mean sensitivity and specificity of WB-MRI, 18F-choline PET/CT, and BS were 0.90/0.88, 0.80/0.92, and 0.60/1.00 for M1b disease. ROC-AUC did not show statistically significant improvement for each component of the LSR; mean ROC-AUC 0.92, 0.94, and 0.93 (p < 0.05) for mDixon + DWI, + T2WI, and + contrast respectively. WB-MRI had an interobserver concordance (κ) of 0.79, 0.68, and 0.58 for N1, M1a, and M1b diseases respectively. CONCLUSIONS WB-MRI provides high levels of diagnostic accuracy for both nodal and metastatic bone disease, with higher levels of sensitivity than BS for metastatic disease, and similar performance to 18F-choline PET/CT. T2 and post-contrast mDixon had no significant additive value above a protocol comprising mDixon and DWI alone. KEY POINTS • A whole-body MRI protocol comprising unenhanced mDixon and diffusion-weighted imaging provides high levels of diagnostic accuracy for the primary staging of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. • The diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI is much higher than that of bone scintigraphy, as currently recommended for clinical use. • Staging using WB-MRI, rather than bone scintigraphy, could result in better patient stratification and treatment delivery than is currently provided to patients worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward William Johnston
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43 - 45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Arash Latifoltojar
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43 - 45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Harbir Singh Sidhu
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43 - 45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Navin Ramachandran
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43 - 45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Magdalena Sokolska
- Medical Physics, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Alan Bainbridge
- Medical Physics, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Caroline Moore
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Imperial College London, Fulham Palace Road, Hammersmith, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, 2nd Floor Charles Bell House, 43 - 45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van Luijtelaar A, Greenwood BM, Ahmed HU, Barqawi AB, Barret E, Bomers JGR, Brausi MA, Choyke PL, Cooperberg MR, Eggener S, Feller JF, Frauscher F, George AK, Hindley RG, Jenniskens SFM, Klotz L, Kovacs G, Lindner U, Loeb S, Margolis DJ, Marks LS, May S, Mcclure TD, Montironi R, Nour SG, Oto A, Polascik TJ, Rastinehad AR, De Reyke TM, Reijnen JS, de la Rosette JJMCH, Sedelaar JPM, Sperling DS, Walser EM, Ward JF, Villers A, Ghai S, Fütterer JJ. Focal laser ablation as clinical treatment of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project. World J Urol 2019; 37:2147-2153. [PMID: 30671638 PMCID: PMC6763411 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02636-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To define the role of focal laser ablation (FLA) as clinical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) using the Delphi consensus method. METHODS A panel of international experts in the field of focal therapy (FT) in PCa conducted a collaborative consensus project using the Delphi method. Experts were invited to online questionnaires focusing on patient selection and treatment of PCa with FLA during four subsequent rounds. After each round, outcomes were displayed, and questionnaires were modified based on the comments provided by panelists. Results were finalized and discussed during face-to-face meetings. RESULTS Thirty-seven experts agreed to participate, and consensus was achieved on 39/43 topics. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as any volume Grade Group 2 [Gleason score (GS) 3+4]. Focal therapy was specified as treatment of all csPCa and can be considered primary treatment as an alternative to radical treatment in carefully selected patients. In patients with intermediate-risk PCa (GS 3+4) as well as patients with MRI-visible and biopsy-confirmed local recurrence, FLA is optimal for targeted ablation of a specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible focus. However, FLA should not be applied to candidates for active surveillance and close follow-up is required. Suitability for FLA is based on tumor volume, location to vital structures, GS, MRI-visibility, and biopsy confirmation. CONCLUSION Focal laser ablation is a promising technique for treatment of clinically localized PCa and should ideally be performed within approved clinical trials. So far, only few studies have reported on FLA and further validation with longer follow-up is mandatory before widespread clinical implementation is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A van Luijtelaar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - H U Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A B Barqawi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - E Barret
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - J G R Bomers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M A Brausi
- Department of Urology, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - P L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - M R Cooperberg
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Eggener
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J F Feller
- Desert Medical Imaging, Indian Wells, CA, USA
| | - F Frauscher
- Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A K George
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - R G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - S F M Jenniskens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L Klotz
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G Kovacs
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - U Lindner
- Department of Urology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - S Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - D J Margolis
- Department of Radiology, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - L S Marks
- Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - S May
- Desert Medical Imaging, Indian Wells, CA, USA
| | - T D Mcclure
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - R Montironi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - S G Nour
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - A Oto
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - T J Polascik
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - T M De Reyke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J S Reijnen
- Department of Radiology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J J M C H de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Amsterdam UMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P M Sedelaar
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - E M Walser
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - J F Ward
- Division of Surgery, Department of Urology, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Villers
- Department of Urology, Lille University Medical Center, Lille, France
| | - S Ghai
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J J Fütterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Miah S, Dunford C, Edison M, Eldred-Evans D, Gan C, Shah TT, Lunn P, Winkler M, Ahmed HU, Gibbons N, Hrouda D. A prospective clinical, cost and environmental analysis of a clinician-led virtual urology clinic. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2019; 101:30-34. [PMID: 30286648 PMCID: PMC6303818 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A virtual clinic is a form of telemedicine where contact between clinical teams and patients occur without face-to-face consultation. Our study aims to quantify the clinical, financial and environmental benefits of our virtual urology clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected data prospectively from our weekly follow-up virtual clinic over a continuous four-month period between July and September 2017. RESULTS In total, we reviewed 409 patients. Following virtual clinic consultation, 68.5% of our patients were discharged from further follow-up. The majority of our patients (male 57.7%, female 55.5%) were of working age. The satisfaction scores were high, at 90.1%, and there were no reported adverse events as a result of using the virtual clinic. Our calculated cost savings were £18,744, with a predicted 12-month cost saving of £56,232. The creation of additional face-to-face clinic capacity has created an estimated 12-month increase in tariff generation for our unit of £72,072. In total, 4623 travel miles were avoided by patients using the virtual clinic, with an estimated avoided carbon footprint of 0.35-1.45 metric tonnes of CO2e, depending on mode of transport. Our predicted 12-month avoided carbon footprint is 1.04-4.04 metric tonnes of CO2e. CONCLUSIONS Our virtual clinic model has demonstrated a trifecta of positive outcomes, namely, clinical, financial and environmental benefits. The environmental importance and benefits of a virtual clinic should be promoted as a social enterprise value when engaging stakeholders in setting up such a urological service. We propose the adoption of our virtual clinic model in those urological units considering this method of telemedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Miah
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Both are first joint authors
| | - C Dunford
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
- Both are first joint authors
| | - M Edison
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Eldred-Evans
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - C Gan
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - TT Shah
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Lunn
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Winkler
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - HU Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - N Gibbons
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Hrouda
- Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bass EJ, Freeman A, Jameson C, Punwani S, Moore CM, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Prostate cancer diagnostic pathway: Is a one-stop cognitive MRI targeted biopsy service a realistic goal in everyday practice? A pilot cohort in a tertiary referral centre in the UK. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e024941. [PMID: 30361408 PMCID: PMC6224764 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of a novel multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and cognitive fusion transperineal targeted biopsy (MRTB) led prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic service with regard to cancer detection and reducing time to diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN Consecutive men being investigated for possible PCa under the UK 2-week wait guidelines. SETTING Tertiary referral centre for PCa in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Men referred with a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination between February 2015 and March 2016 under the UK 2-week rule guideline. INTERVENTIONS An mpMRI was performed prior to patients attending clinic, on the same day. If required, MRTB was offered. Results were available within 48 hours and discussed at a specialist multidisciplinary team meeting. Patients returned for counselling within 7 days PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures in this regard included the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients referred with a suspicion of PCa. Quality control outcome measures included clinically significant and total cancer detection rates. RESULTS 112 men were referred to the service. 111 (99.1%) underwent mpMRI. Median PSA was 9.4 ng/mL (IQR 5.6-21.0). 87 patients had a target on mpMRI with 25 scoring Likert 3/5 for likelihood of disease, 26 4/5 and 36 5/5.57 (51%) patients received a local anaesthetic, Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (MRTB). Cancer was detected in 45 (79%). 43 (96%) had University College London definition 2 disease or greater. The times to diagnosis and treatment were a median of 8 and 20 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This approach greatly reduces the time to diagnosis and treatment. Detection rates of significant cancer are high. Similar services may be valuable to patients with a potential diagnosis of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward James Bass
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles Jameson
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Medicine, Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lloyd CE, Nouwen A, Sartorius N, Ahmed HU, Alvarez A, Bahendeka S, Basangwa D, Bobrov AE, Boden S, Bulgari V, Burti L, Chaturvedi SK, Cimino LC, Gaebel W, de Girolamo G, Gondek TM, de Braude MG, Guntupalli A, Heinze MG, Ji L, Hong X, Khan A, Kiejna A, Kokoszka A, Kamala T, Lalic NM, Lecic Tosevski D, Mankovsky B, Li M, Musau A, Müssig K, Ndetei D, Rabbani G, Srikanta SS, Starostina EG, Shevchuk M, Taj R, Vukovic O, Wölwer W, Xin Y. Prevalence and correlates of depressive disorders in people with Type 2 diabetes: results from the International Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes and Depression (INTERPRET-DD) study, a collaborative study carried out in 14 countries. Diabet Med 2018; 35:760-769. [PMID: 29478265 DOI: 10.1111/dme.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To assess the prevalence and management of depressive disorders in people with Type 2 diabetes in different countries. METHODS People with diabetes aged 18-65 years and treated in outpatient settings were recruited in 14 countries and underwent a psychiatric interview. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. Demographic and medical record data were collected. RESULTS A total of 2783 people with Type 2 diabetes (45.3% men, mean duration of diabetes 8.8 years) participated. Overall, 10.6% were diagnosed with current major depressive disorder and 17.0% reported moderate to severe levels of depressive symptomatology (Patient Health Questionnaire scores >9). Multivariable analyses showed that, after controlling for country, current major depressive disorder was significantly associated with gender (women) (P<0.0001), a lower level of education (P<0.05), doing less exercise (P<0.01), higher levels of diabetes distress (P<0.0001) and a previous diagnosis of major depressive disorder (P<0.0001). The proportion of those with either current major depressive disorder or moderate to severe levels of depressive symptomatology who had a diagnosis or any treatment for their depression recorded in their medical records was extremely low and non-existent in many countries (0-29.6%). CONCLUSIONS Our international study, the largest of this type ever undertaken, shows that people with diabetes frequently have depressive disorders and also significant levels of depressive symptoms. Our findings indicate that the identification and appropriate care for psychological and psychiatric problems is not the norm and suggest a lack of the comprehensive approach to diabetes management that is needed to improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Lloyd
- The Open University, School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, UK
| | - A Nouwen
- Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, UK
| | - N Sartorius
- Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes, Switzerland
| | - H U Ahmed
- Child Adolescent & Family Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - A Alvarez
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Bahendeka
- Mother Kevin Post Graduate Medical School, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - D Basangwa
- Mother Kevin Post Graduate Medical School, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - A E Bobrov
- Federal Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology, Moscow, Russia
| | - S Boden
- The Open University, School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, UK
| | - V Bulgari
- Psychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, Saint John of God Clinical Research Centre, Brescia, Italy
- PhD School in Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
| | - L Burti
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
| | - S K Chaturvedi
- National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
| | | | - W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - G de Girolamo
- Psychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, Saint John of God Clinical Research Centre, Brescia, Italy
| | - T M Gondek
- Department of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - A Guntupalli
- School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, UK
| | - M G Heinze
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - L Ji
- People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - X Hong
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - A Khan
- Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan
| | - A Kiejna
- University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - A Kokoszka
- II Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - T Kamala
- Diabetes Centre and Jnana Sanjeevini Medical Centre, Bangalore, India
| | - N M Lalic
- Clinic for Endocrinology, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade
| | - D Lecic Tosevski
- Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - B Mankovsky
- Department of Diabetology, National Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, Ukraine
| | - M Li
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - A Musau
- Africa Mental Health Foundation, Kenya
| | - K Müssig
- Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Centre
- Leibniz Centre for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Centre for Diabetes Research (DZD), München-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - D Ndetei
- University of Nairobi, Africa Mental Health Foundation, Kenya
| | - G Rabbani
- Popular Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - S S Srikanta
- Samatvam Endocrinology Diabetes Centre and Jnana Sanjeevini Medical Centre, Bangalore, India
| | - E G Starostina
- Department of Endocrinology, Moscow Regional Clinical and Research Institute, Russia
| | - M Shevchuk
- Department of Diabetology, National Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - R Taj
- Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan
| | - O Vukovic
- Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - W Wölwer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Y Xin
- Clinical Research Centre, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Clinical Research Centre, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Centre for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chau EM, Arya M, Petrides N, Aldin Z, McKenzie J, Emberton M, Virdi J, Ahmed HU, Kasivisvanathan V. Performance characteristics of multiparametric-MRI at a non-academic hospital using transperineal template mapping biopsy as a reference standard. International Journal of Surgery Open 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- H U Ahmed
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Linch M, Goh G, Hiley C, Shanmugabavan Y, McGranahan N, Rowan A, Wong YNS, King H, Furness A, Freeman A, Linares J, Akarca A, Herrero J, Rosenthal R, Harder N, Schmidt G, Wilson GA, Birkbak NJ, Mitter R, Dentro S, Cathcart P, Arya M, Johnston E, Scott R, Hung M, Emberton M, Attard G, Szallasi Z, Punwani S, Quezada SA, Marafioti T, Gerlinger M, Ahmed HU, Swanton C. Intratumoural evolutionary landscape of high-risk prostate cancer: the PROGENY study of genomic and immune parameters. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:2472-2480. [PMID: 28961847 PMCID: PMC5815564 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intratumoural heterogeneity (ITH) is well recognised in prostate cancer (PC), but its role in high-risk disease is uncertain. A prospective, single-arm, translational study using targeted multiregion prostate biopsies was carried out to study genomic and T-cell ITH in clinically high-risk PC aiming to identify drivers and potential therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-nine men with elevated prostate-specific antigen and multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging detected PC underwent image-guided multiregion transperineal biopsy. Seventy-nine tumour regions from 25 patients with PC underwent sequencing, analysis of mutations, copy number and neoepitopes combined with tumour infiltrating T-cell subset quantification. RESULTS We demonstrated extensive somatic nucleotide variation and somatic copy number alteration heterogeneity in high-risk PC. Overall, the mutational burden was low (0.93/Megabase), but two patients had hypermutation, with loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, MSH2 and MSH6. Somatic copy number alteration burden was higher in patients with metastatic hormone-naive PC (mHNPC) than in those with high-risk localised PC (hrlPC), independent of Gleason grade. Mutations were rarely ubiquitous and mutational frequencies were similar for mHNPC and hrlPC patients. Enrichment of focal 3q26.2 and 3q21.3, regions containing putative metastasis drivers, was seen in mHNPC patients. We found evidence of parallel evolution with three separate clones containing activating mutations of β-catenin in a single patient. We demonstrated extensive intratumoural and intertumoural T-cell heterogeneity and high inflammatory infiltrate in the MMR-deficient (MMRD) patients and the patient with parallel evolution of β-catenin. Analysis of all patients with activating Wnt/β-catenin mutations demonstrated a low CD8+/FOXP3+ ratio, a potential surrogate marker of immune evasion. CONCLUSIONS The PROGENY (PROstate cancer GENomic heterogeneitY) study provides a diagnostic platform suitable for studying tumour ITH. Genetic aberrations in clinically high-risk PC are associated with altered patterns of immune infiltrate in tumours. Activating mutations of Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway or MMRD could be considered as potential biomarkers for immunomodulation therapies. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT02022371.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Linch
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Goh
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - C Hiley
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK;; Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Y Shanmugabavan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - N McGranahan
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - A Rowan
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Y N S Wong
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Cancer Immunology Unit, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - H King
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - A Furness
- Cancer Immunology Unit, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - A Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Linares
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Akarca
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Herrero
- Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - R Rosenthal
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Bill Lyons Informatics Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | | | - G A Wilson
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - N J Birkbak
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - R Mitter
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - S Dentro
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK;; Experimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - P Cathcart
- The Urology Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Arya
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK;; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Johnston
- Centre for Medical Imaging, Universtiy College London, London, UK
| | - R Scott
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Hung
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK;; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Attard
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK;; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Z Szallasi
- Centre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark;; Computational Health Informatics Program (CHIP), Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA;; MTA-SE-NAP Brain Metastasis Research Group, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - S Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, Universtiy College London, London, UK
| | - S A Quezada
- Cancer Immunology Unit, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - T Marafioti
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Gerlinger
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK;; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK;; Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK;; Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - C Swanton
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK;; Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK;; Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK;.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shah TT, To WKL, Ahmed HU. Magnetic resonance imaging in the early detection of prostate cancer and review of the literature on magnetic resonance imaging-stratified clinical pathways. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:1159-1168. [PMID: 28933973 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1383899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With level 1 evidence now available on the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) we must now utilise this data in developing an MRI-stratified diagnostic pathway for the early detection of prostate cancer. Areas covered: A literature review was conducted and identified seven randomised control trials (RCT's) assessing the diagnostic accuracy of such a pathway against the previously accepted systematic/random trans-rectal ultrasound guided (TRUS) biopsy pathway. The studies were heterogeneous in their design. Five studies assessed the addition of MRI-targeted biopsies to a standard care systematic TRUS biopsy pathway. Three of these studies showed either an increase in their diagnostic accuracy or the potential to remove systematic biopsies. Two studies looked specifically at a targeted biopsy only pathway and although the results were again mixed, there was no decrease in the diagnostic rate and overall significantly fewer biopsy cores were taken in the MRI group. Expert commentary: Results from these RCT's together with multiple retrospective and prospective studies point towards either an improved diagnostic rate for clinically significant cancer and/or a reduction in the need for systematic biopsies with a MRI-stratified pathway. The challenge for the urological community will be to implement pre-biopsy MRI into a routine clinical pathway with likely independent monitoring of standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taimur Tariq Shah
- a Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , London , UK.,b Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital , Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK.,c Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences , University College London , London , UK.,d Department of Urology , Whittington Hospitals NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Wilson King Lim To
- c Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences , University College London , London , UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- a Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , London , UK.,b Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital , Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tay KJ, Scheltema MJ, Ahmed HU, Barret E, Coleman JA, Dominguez-Escrig J, Ghai S, Huang J, Jones JS, Klotz LH, Robertson CN, Sanchez-Salas R, Scionti S, Sivaraman A, de la Rosette J, Polascik TJ. Patient selection for prostate focal therapy in the era of active surveillance: an International Delphi Consensus Project. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 20:294-299. [PMID: 28349978 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Revised: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-gland extirpation or irradiation is considered the gold standard for curative oncological treatment for localized prostate cancer, but is often associated with sexual and urinary impairment that adversely affects quality of life. This has led to increased interest in developing therapies with effective cancer control but less morbidity. We aimed to provide details of physician consensus on patient selection for prostate focal therapy (FT) in the era of contemporary prostate cancer management. METHODS We undertook a four-stage Delphi consensus project among a panel of 47 international experts in prostate FT. Data on three main domains (role of biopsy/imaging, disease and patient factors) were collected in three iterative rounds of online questionnaires and feedback. Consensus was defined as agreement in ⩾80% of physicians. Finally, an in-person meeting was attended by a core group of 16 experts to review the data and formulate the consensus statement. RESULTS Consensus was obtained in 16 of 18 subdomains. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a standard imaging tool for patient selection for FT. In the presence of an mpMRI-suspicious lesion, histological confirmation is necessary prior to FT. In addition, systematic biopsy remains necessary to assess mpMRI-negative areas. However, adequate criteria for systematic biopsy remains indeterminate. FT can be recommended in D'Amico low-/intermediate-risk cancer including Gleason 4+3. Gleason 3+4 cancer, where localized, discrete and of favorable size represents the ideal case for FT. Tumor foci <1.5 ml on mpMRI or <20% of the prostate are suitable for FT, or up to 3 ml or 25% if localized to one hemi-gland. Gleason 3+3 at one core 1mm is acceptable in the untreated area. Preservation of sexual function is an important goal, but lack of erectile function should not exclude a patient from FT. CONCLUSIONS This consensus provides a contemporary insight into expert opinion of patient selection for FT of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Tay
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M J Scheltema
- Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College of London, London, UK
| | - E Barret
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - J A Coleman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - S Ghai
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J S Jones
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - L H Klotz
- Sunnybrook Medical Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - R Sanchez-Salas
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - S Scionti
- Saratosa Prostate Cancer Center, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - A Sivaraman
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - J de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bass EJ, Donaldson IA, Freeman A, Jameson C, Punwani S, Moore C, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 20:311-317. [PMID: 28485391 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Revised: 01/29/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high rates of disease misclassification and sepsis, the use of transrectal biopsy remains commonplace. Transperineal mapping biopsies mitigate these problems but carry increased cost and patient burden. Local anaesthetic, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted transperineal biopsy may offer an alternative. Here, we aim to determine the feasibility, tolerability and detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer using a local anaesthetic, transperineal, MRI-targeted biopsy technique. METHODS Tertiary referral centre in which 181 consecutive men underwent local anaesthetic, transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (September 2014 to January 2016). A standardized local anaesthetic technique was used to obtain targeted biopsies using visual estimation with the number of targeted cores determined by each of a number of users. We assessed adverse events, patient visual analogue pain scores and detection rates of clinically significant cancer (defined by University College London (UCL) definitions one and two and separately by the presence of dominant and non-dominant Gleason pattern 4). We secondarily assessed detection of any cancer, rates of detection by MRI (Likert) score and by presenting PSA. Differences were assessed using Chi-squared tests (P<0.05). RESULTS One hundred eighty-one men with 243 lesions were included. There were no episodes of sepsis or re-admissions and one procedure was abandoned owing to patient discomfort. Twenty-three out of 25 (92%) men would recommend the procedure to another. Median visual analogue pain score was 1.0 (interquartile range: 0.0-2.4). A total 104/181 (57%) had UCL definition 1 disease (Gleason ⩾4+3 and/or maximum cancer length ⩾6 mm) and 129/181 (71%) had UCL definition 2 cancer (Gleason ⩾3+4 and/or maximum cancer length ⩾4 mm). Fifty-four out of 181 (30%) and 124/181 (69%) had dominant and non-dominant pattern 4 disease or greater (irrespective of cancer length). Any cancer was detected in 142/181 (78%). Significant disease was more likely in higher MRI-scoring lesions and in men with PSAs ⩾10 ng ml-1. CONCLUSIONS This approach to prostate biopsy is feasible, tolerable and can be performed in ambulatory settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Bass
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I A Donaldson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Jameson
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Arya
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kanthabalan A, Peters M, Van Vulpen M, McCartan N, Hindley RG, Emara A, Moore CM, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Focal salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound in radiorecurrent prostate cancer. BJU Int 2017; 120:246-256. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abi Kanthabalan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; University College London; London UK
- Department of Urology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Centre Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Marco Van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Centre Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; University College London; London UK
- Department of Urology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | | | - Amr Emara
- Department of Urology; Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Basingstoke UK
| | - Caroline M. Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; University College London; London UK
- Department of Urology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Department of Urology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; University College London; London UK
- Department of Urology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science; University College London; London UK
- Department of Urology; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Division of Surgery; Department of Surgery and Cancer; Faculty of Medicine; Imperial College London; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Georgiou PS, Jaros J, Payne H, Allen C, Shah TT, Ahmed HU, Gibson E, Barratt D, Treeby BE. Beam distortion due to gold fiducial markers during salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound in the prostate. Med Phys 2016; 44:679-693. [PMID: 28032342 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) provides a non-invasive salvage treatment option for patients with recurrence after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). As part of EBRT the prostate is frequently implanted with permanent fiducial markers. To date, the impact of these markers on subsequent HIFU treatment is unknown. The objective of this work was to systematically investigate, using computational simulations, how these fiducial markers affect the delivery of HIFU treatment. METHODS A series of simulations was performed modelling the propagation of ultrasound pressure waves in the prostate with a single spherical or cylindrical gold marker at different positions and orientations. For each marker configuration, a set of metrics (spatial-peak temporal-average intensity, focus shift, focal volume) was evaluated to quantify the distortion introduced at the focus. An analytical model was also developed describing the marker effect on the intensity at the focus. The model was used to examine the marker's impact in a clinical setting through case studies. RESULTS The simulations show that the presence of the marker in the pre-focal region causes reflections which induce a decrease in the focal intensity and focal volume, and a shift of the maximum pressure point away from the transducer's focus. These effects depend on the shape and orientation of the marker and become more pronounced as its distance from the transducer's focus decreases, with the distortion introduced by the marker greatly increasing when placed within 5 mm of the focus. The analytical model approximates the marker's effect and can be used as an alternative method to the computationally intensive and time consuming simulations for quickly estimating the intensity at the focus. A retrospective review of a small patient cohort selected for focal HIFU after failed EBRT indicates that the presence of the marker may affect HIFU treatment delivery. CONCLUSIONS The distortion introduced by the marker to the HIFU beam when positioned close to the focus may result in an undertreated region beyond the marker due to less energy arriving at the focus, and an overtreated region due to reflections. Further work is necessary to investigate whether the results presented here justify the revision of the patient selection criteria or the markers' placement protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P S Georgiou
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Jaros
- Faculty of Information Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - H Payne
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - C Allen
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - T T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - E Gibson
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Barratt
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - B E Treeby
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Valerio M, Shah TT, Shah P, Mccartan N, Emberton M, Arya M, Ahmed HU. Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion focal cryotherapy of the prostate: A prospective development study. Urol Oncol 2016; 35:150.e1-150.e7. [PMID: 27955940 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of software-based magnetic resonance-transrectal ultrasound fusion to deliver focal therapy may increase the precision of treatment. This is a prospective development study assessing the feasibility of Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion focal cryotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Consecutive patients undergoing focal cryotherapy were included in an academic registry (December 2013-June 2014). MRI-TRUS fusion focal cryotherapy was offered to men with visible clinically significant prostate cancer (Galil SeedNet system). Eligibility was determined by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and transperineal template mapping or targeted biopsies. A rigid fusion platform (Biojet) was used with the operator ensuring the ice ball covered at least the lesion. Adverse events were scored using the NCICTC V4. Genitourinary toxicity was assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (IPSS, IIEF-15, and UCLA-EPIC). Early contrast-enhanced MRI and mpMRI at 6 to 12 months were used to assess extent of lesion ablation. RESULTS Of 23 patients scheduled, 5 did not have image fusion owing to surgeon preference. Overall, 18 patients undergoing image-fusion cryotherapy had median age of 68 (interquartile range [IQR]: 65-73) years and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen = 9.54 (5.65-16)ng/ml. In all, 13 (72.2%) and 5 (27.8%) patients had intermediate and high-risk cancer, respectively. In total, 10 adverse events were reported with one of these as serious (grade 3) because of admission for hematuria requiring wash out only. There was no difference in the IIEF-15 between baseline and study end (P = 0.24). The IPSS remained stable (P = 0.12), whereas the UCLA-EPIC tended to improve (P = 0.065). The prostate-specific antigen level significantly decreased at 1.8 (1.04-2.93) ng/ml (P<0.001). Both early and late mpMRI showed no residual disease in the treated area. In 2 men, radiological progression of known contralateral disease was observed; both underwent focal high intensity focused ultrasound. CONCLUSION MRI-TRUS fusion focal cryotherapy is feasible in most patients and seems to accurately guide ablation demonstrated by posttreatment imaging. Additional studies are needed to determine efficacy using postcryotherapy biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Valerio
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Taimur Tariq Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paras Shah
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Mccartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Manit Arya
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Grey ADR, Ahmed HU. Re: Limitations of Elastography Based Prostate Biopsy: J. Schiffmann, M. Grindei, Z. Tian, D.-J. Yassin, T. Steinwender, S.-R. Leyh-Bannurah, M. Randazzo, M. Kwiatkowski, P. I. Karakiewicz, P. Hammerer and L. Manka J Urol 2016;195:1731-1736. J Urol 2016; 197:263-264. [PMID: 27765703 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alistair David Robertson Grey
- Department of Tissue and Energy, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London Faculty of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Department of Tissue and Energy, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London Faculty of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
El-Shater Bosaily A, Valerio M, Hu Y, Freeman A, Jameson C, Brown L, Kaplan R, Hindley RG, Barratt D, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. The concordance between the volume hotspot and the grade hotspot: a 3-D reconstructive model using the pathology outputs from the PROMIS trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2016; 19:322. [PMID: 27502740 PMCID: PMC5411669 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
42
|
Shah TT, Peters M, Kanthabalan A, McCartan N, Fatola Y, van der Voort van Zyp J, van Vulpen M, Freeman A, Moore CM, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. PSA nadir as a predictive factor for biochemical disease-free survival and overall survival following whole-gland salvage HIFU following radiotherapy failure. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2016; 19:311-6. [PMID: 27431499 PMCID: PMC4983180 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background: Treatment options for radio-recurrent prostate cancer are either androgen-deprivation therapy or salvage prostatectomy. Whole-gland high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) might have a role in this setting. Methods: An independent HIFU registry collated consecutive cases of HIFU. Between 2005 and 2012, we identified 50 men who underwent whole-gland HIFU following histological confirmation of localised disease following prior external beam radiotherapy (2005–2012). No upper threshold was applied for risk category, PSA or Gleason grade either at presentation or at the time of failure. Progression was defined as a composite with biochemical failure (Phoenix criteria (PSA>nadir+2 ng ml−1)), start of systemic therapies or metastases. Results: Median age (interquartile range (IQR)), pretreatment PSA (IQR) and Gleason score (range) were 68 years (64–72), 5.9 ng ml−1 (2.2–11.3) and 7 (6–9), respectively. Median follow-up was 64 months (49–84). In all, 24/50 (48%) avoided androgen-deprivation therapies. Also, a total of 28/50 (56%) achieved a PSA nadir <0.5 ng ml−1, 15/50 (30%) had a nadir ⩾0.5 ng ml−1 and 7/50 (14%) did not nadir (PSA non-responders). Actuarial 1, 3 and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 72, 40 and 31%, respectively. Actuarial 1, 3 and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 100, 94 and 87%, respectively. When comparing patients with PSA nadir <0.5 ng ml−1, nadir ⩾0.5 and non-responders, a statistically significant difference in PFS was seen (P<0.0001). Three-year PFS in each group was 57, 20 and 0%, respectively. Five-year OS was 96, 100 and 38%, respectively. Early in the learning curve, between 2005 and 2007, 3/50 (6%) developed a fistula. Intervention for bladder outlet obstruction was needed in 27/50 (54%). Patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires showed incontinence (any pad-use) as 8/26 (31%). Conclusions: In our series of high-risk patients, in whom 30–50% may have micro-metastases, disease control rates were promising in PSA responders, however, with significant morbidity. Additionally, post-HIFU PSA nadir appears to be an important predictor for both progression and survival. Further research on focal salvage ablation in order to reduce toxicity while retaining disease control rates is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Kanthabalan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Y Fatola
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J van der Voort van Zyp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Arya
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,NIHR UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hamid S, Guillaumier S, Shah T, Arya M, Ahmed HU. Prostate cancer recurrence after Focal Therapy: Treatment options. ARCH ESP UROL 2016; 69:375-383. [PMID: 27416641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Focal therapy is a novel treatment option in localised prostate cancer with or without a visible lesion on MRI. Treatment for low to intermediate risk prostate cancer with focal therapy has demonstrated good short to medium term outcomes with fewer undesirable genitourinary side effects. This has made focal therapy more appealing to men who find the implications of radical treatment unacceptable or are unable to tolerate active surveillance. In this paper we review the literature for treatment options in prostate cancer recurrence post focal therapy. We also cover the different definitions of failure agreed upon in previous consensus meetings, as well as their implications on future management focal therapy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hamid
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science. Urology Research Group, UCL. London. UK. Department of Urology. UCLH NHS Foundation Trust. London. UK
| | - S Guillaumier
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science. Urology Research Group, UCL. London. UK. Department of Urology. UCLH NHS Foundation Trust. London. UK
| | - T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science. Urology Research Group, UCL. London. UK. Department of Urology. Whittington Hospital NHS Trust. London. UK
| | - M Arya
- Department of Urology. Whittington Hospital NHS Trust. London. UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science. Urology Research Group, UCL. London. UK. Department of Urology. UCLH NHS Foundation Trust. London. UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Kaplan RS, Colaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AK, Oldroyd R, Gabe R, Parker CC, Emberton M. The PROMIS study: A paired-cohort, blinded confirmatory study evaluating the accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in men with an elevated PSA. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.5000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Katie Ward
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Basingstoke Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Freeman
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex K Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Oldroyd
- Patient Representative, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Chris C. Parker
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Valerio M, Dickinson L, Ali A, Ramachadran N, Donaldson I, Mccartan N, Freeman A, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. MP18-20 THE NANOKNIFE ELECTROPORATION ABLATION TRIAL (NEAT): A PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT STUDY. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
46
|
Guillaumier S, Hamid S, Charman S, Charman S, van der Meulen J, McCartan N, Shah K, Hindley R, Nigam R, Dudderidge T, Afzal N, Cornaby A, Lewi H, Persad R, Virdi J, Moore C, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. MP18-08 FOCAL HIFU FOR TREATMENT OF LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTI-CENTRE REGISTRY EXPERIENCE. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - H Lewi
- Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Peters M, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Moerland MA, Hoekstra CJ, van de Pol S, Westendorp H, Maenhout M, Kattevilder R, Verkooijen HM, van Rossum PSN, Ahmed HU, Shah TT, Emberton M, van Vulpen M. Development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model for biochemical failure after whole-gland salvage iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:296-305. [PMID: 26948662 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Revised: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Localized recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be curatively treated using salvage iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy. Selection is hampered by a lack of predictive factors for cancer control. This study aims to develop and internally validate a prognostic model for biochemical failure (BF) after salvage (125)I brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Whole-gland salvage (125)I brachytherapy patients were treated between 1993 and 2010 in two radiotherapy centers in the Netherlands. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess the predictive value of clinical parameters related to BF (Phoenix-definition [prostate-specific antigen [PSA]-nadir + 2.0 ng/mL]). Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. The model's discriminatory ability was assessed with Harrell's C-statistic. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (2000 data sets). Goodness-of-fit was evaluated with calibration plots. All analyses were performed using the recently published TRIPOD (Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) statement. RESULTS After median followup of 74 months (range 5-138), 43 of a total 62 patients developed BF. In multivariable analysis, disease-free survival interval (DFSI) after primary therapy and pre-salvage prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) were predictors of BF: corrected hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.97-0.999; p = 0.04) and 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.99; p = 0.03), both for a 1-month increase (optimism-adjusted C-statistic 0.70). Calibration was accurate up to 36 months. Of patients with PSADT >30 months and DFSI >60 months, 36-month biochemical disease-free survival was >75%. Every 12-month increase in DFSI will allow 3-month decrease in PSADT while maintaining the same biochemical recurrence-free rates. CONCLUSIONS We have presented results from a cohort of patients undergoing salvage (125)I-brachytherapy. Our data show that better selection of patients is possible with the DFSI and PSADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - M A Moerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C J Hoekstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - S van de Pol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - H Westendorp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - M Maenhout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Kattevilder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service (UCLH NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service (UCLH NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service (UCLH NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH/UCL) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - M van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hu Y, Gibson E, Ahmed HU, Moore CM, Emberton M, Barratt DC. Population-based prediction of subject-specific prostate deformation for MR-to-ultrasound image registration. Med Image Anal 2015; 26:332-44. [PMID: 26606458 PMCID: PMC4686007 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Revised: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 10/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Statistical shape models of soft-tissue organ motion provide a useful means of imposing physical constraints on the displacements allowed during non-rigid image registration, and can be especially useful when registering sparse and/or noisy image data. In this paper, we describe a method for generating a subject-specific statistical shape model that captures prostate deformation for a new subject given independent population data on organ shape and deformation obtained from magnetic resonance (MR) images and biomechanical modelling of tissue deformation due to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe pressure. The characteristics of the models generated using this method are compared with corresponding models based on training data generated directly from subject-specific biomechanical simulations using a leave-one-out cross validation. The accuracy of registering MR and TRUS images of the prostate using the new prostate models was then estimated and compared with published results obtained in our earlier research. No statistically significant difference was found between the specificity and generalisation ability of prostate shape models generated using the two approaches. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the landmark-based target registration errors (TREs) following registration using different models, with a median (95th percentile) TRE of 2.40 (6.19) mm versus 2.42 (7.15) mm using models generated with the new method versus a model built directly from patient-specific biomechanical simulation data, respectively (N = 800; 8 patient datasets; 100 registrations per patient). We conclude that the proposed method provides a computationally efficient and clinically practical alternative to existing complex methods for modelling and predicting subject-specific prostate deformation, such as biomechanical simulations, for new subjects. The method may also prove useful for generating shape models for other organs, for example, where only limited shape training data from dynamic imaging is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yipeng Hu
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Eli Gibson
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK; Diagnostic Image Analysis group, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dean C Barratt
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Valerio M, Anele C, Bott SRJ, Charman SC, van der Meulen J, El-Mahallawi H, Emara AM, Freeman A, Jameson C, Hindley RG, Montgomery BSI, Singh PB, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. The Prevalence of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer According to Commonly Used Histological Thresholds in Men Undergoing Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies. J Urol 2015; 195:1403-1408. [PMID: 26626221 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transrectal prostate biopsies are inaccurate and, thus, the prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer in men undergoing biopsy is unknown. We determined the ability of different histological thresholds to denote clinically significant cancer in men undergoing a more accurate biopsy, that of transperineal template prostate mapping. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this multicenter, cross-sectional cohort of men who underwent template prostate mapping biopsies between May 2006 and January 2012, 4 different thresholds of significance combining tumor grade and burden were used to measure the consequent variation with respect to the prevalence of clinically significant disease. RESULTS Of 1,203 men 17% (199) had no previous biopsy, 38% (455) had a prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy, 24% (289) were on active surveillance and 21% (260) were seeking risk stratification. Mean patient age was 63.5 years (SD 7.6) and median prostate specific antigen was 7.4 ng/ml (IQR 5.3-10.5). Overall 35% of the patients (424) had no cancer detected. The prevalence of clinically significant cancer varied between 14% and 83% according to the histological threshold used, in particular between 30% and 51% among men who had no previous biopsy, between 14% and 27% among men who had a prior negative biopsy, between 36% and 74% among men on active surveillance, and between 47% and 83% among men seeking risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS According to template prostate mapping biopsy between 1 in 2 and 1 in 3 men have prostate cancer that is histologically defined as clinically significant. This suggests that the commonly used thresholds may be set too low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Valerio
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - C Anele
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S R J Bott
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
| | - S C Charman
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - J van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - H El-Mahallawi
- Department of Histopathology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - A M Emara
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - A Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Jameson
- Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital London, London, United Kingdom
| | - R G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - B S I Montgomery
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
| | - P B Singh
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kanthabalan A, Shah T, Arya M, Punwani S, Bomanji J, Haroon A, Illing RO, Latifoltojar A, Freeman A, Jameson C, van der Meulen J, Charman S, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. The FORECAST study - Focal recurrent assessment and salvage treatment for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 44:175-186. [PMID: 26184343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Revised: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One-third of men may experience biochemical failure by 8years following radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Over 90% of men are started on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) which is non-curative and confers systemic side-effects. Focal salvage therapy (FST) limits collateral tissue damage and may improve therapeutic ratios. In order to deliver FST, distant disease must be ruled-out and intra-prostatic disease must be accurately detected, localised and characterised. AIM FORECAST - Focal Recurrent Assessment and Salvage Treatment - is a study designed to evaluate a novel imaging-based diagnostic and therapeutic complex intervention pathway for men who fail radiotherapy. METHODS Men with biochemical failure following radical prostate radiotherapy, prior to salvage therapy will be recruited. They will undergo whole-body multi-parametric MRI (WB-MRI), choline PET/CT, bone-scan and pelvic-mpMRI and then MRI transperineal-targeted biopsies (MRI-TB) and Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy (TPM). Those suitable for FST will undergo either high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryotherapy. RESULTS Primary outcome measures: a) the accuracy of WB-MRI to detect distant metastatic disease; b) accuracy of prostate mpMRI in local detection of radiorecurrent prostate cancer; c) detection accuracy of MRI-TB; and d) rate of urinary incontinence following FST. CONCLUSION Focal salvage therapy may confer lower rates of morbidity whilst retaining disease control. In order to deliver FST, intra- and extra-prostatic disease must be detected early and localised accurately. Novel diagnostic techniques including WB-MRI and MRI-TB may improve the detection of distant and local disease whilst reducing healthcare burdens compared with current imaging and biopsy strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kanthabalan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK
| | - M Arya
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S Punwani
- Department of Radiology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, UK
| | - J Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Haroon
- Centre for Medical Imaging and Computing, University College London, UK
| | - R O Illing
- Department of Radiology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Latifoltojar
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, UK
| | - A Freeman
- Department of Pathology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - C Jameson
- Department of Pathology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - S Charman
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|