1
|
Light A, Mayor N, Cullen E, Kirkham A, Padhani AR, Arya M, Bomers JGR, Dudderidge T, Ehdaie B, Freeman A, Guillaumier S, Hindley R, Lakhani A, Pendse D, Punwani S, Rastinehad AR, Rouvière O, Sanchez-Salas R, Schoots IG, Sokhi HK, Tam H, Tempany CM, Valerio M, Verma S, Villeirs G, van der Meulen J, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. The Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Focal Therapy (TARGET): A Systematic Review and International Consensus Recommendations. Eur Urol 2024; 85:466-482. [PMID: 38519280 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect recurrences after focal therapy for prostate cancer but there is no robust guidance regarding its use. Our objective was to produce consensus recommendations on MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting after focal therapy. METHODS A systematic review was performed in July 2022 to develop consensus statements. A two-round consensus exercise was then performed, with a consensus meeting in January 2023, during which 329 statements were scored by 23 panellists from Europe and North America spanning urology, radiology, and pathology with experience across eight focal therapy modalities. Using RAND Corporation/University of California-Los Angeles methodology, the Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with MRI after Focal Therapy (TARGET) were based on consensus for statements scored with agreement or disagreement. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 73 studies were included in the review. All 20 studies (100%) reporting suspicious imaging features cited focal contrast enhancement as suspicious for cancer recurrence. Of 31 studies reporting MRI assessment criteria, the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score was the scheme used most often (20 studies; 65%), followed by a 5-point Likert score (six studies; 19%). For the consensus exercise, consensus for statements scored with agreement or disagreement increased from 227 of 295 statements (76.9%) in round one to 270 of 329 statements (82.1%) in round two. Key recommendations include performing routine MRI at 12 mo using a multiparametric protocol compliant with PI-RADS version 2.1 standards. PI-RADS category scores for assessing recurrence within the ablation zone should be avoided. An alternative 5-point scoring system is presented that includes a major dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence and joint minor diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted sequences. For the DCE sequence, focal nodular strong early enhancement was the most suspicious imaging finding. A structured minimum reporting data set and minimum reporting standards for studies detailing MRI data after focal therapy are presented. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The TARGET consensus recommendations may improve MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting after focal therapy for prostate cancer and provide minimum standards for study reporting. PATIENT SUMMARY Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can detect recurrent of prostate cancer after focal treatments, but there is a lack of guidance on MRI use for this purpose. We report new expert recommendations that may improve practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Light
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nikhil Mayor
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Cullen
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Joyce G R Bomers
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Amish Lakhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas Pendse
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Vascular and Urinary Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heminder K Sokhi
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Department of Radiology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Henry Tam
- Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carbin DD, Abou Chedid W, Hindley R, Eden C. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men after trans-urethral resection of the prostate: a matched-pair analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:158. [PMID: 38568342 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01935-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Prior history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can complicate Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Very few studies analyse the outcomes of RARP in men with a prior history of TURP. We analysed the oncological and functional outcomes of RARP in post-TURP men from our prospectively maintained database. We included the RARP data from January 2016 to January 2022. Thirty men who had RARP with a prior history of TURP were identified (Group 2). They were matched using R software and propensity score matching to 90 men with no previous TURP (Group-1). The groups were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), Gleason score, stage, PSA and D'Amico risk category in a 1:3 ratio. The two-year oncological and functional outcomes were compared. Overall, the study found no significant difference between the groups in the preoperative parameters, such as BMI, age, Gleason grade, clinical stage, PSA, prostate volume, and D'amico risk grouping. There was no difference in the estimated blood loss. The TURP group had a lower chance of having a nerve spare (p = 0.03). The median console time was longer in the TURP group (140 min (120,180) versus 168 (129,190) p = 0.058). The postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo 3a 2% versus 6.7%) and hospital stay (median of 2 days), positive surgical margins, continence, and biochemical recurrence rates at 3, 12, and 24 months were not statistically different between the groups. In high-volume centres, the oncological and continence outcomes of RARP post-TURP are not inferior to that of men without prior TURP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wissam Abou Chedid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | | | - Christopher Eden
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hindley R. Is less indeed more for Rezum water vapour treatment of the lateral prostate lobes? BJU Int 2023; 132:234-235. [PMID: 37190987 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
- Department of Health and Wellbeing, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shah A, Hindley R, Vasdev N, Burn P, Hinton M, Rix A, Moreira Da Silva N, Sala E. Assessing the potential of artificial intelligence for prostate MRI in a diverse multi-centre diagnostic population. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01018-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
5
|
Husted M, Gray D, Golding SE, Hindley R. Reaching a Tipping Point: A Qualitative Exploration of Quality of Life and Treatment Decision-Making in People Living With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Qual Health Res 2022; 32:1979-1992. [PMID: 36154347 PMCID: PMC9629511 DOI: 10.1177/10497323221129262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition amongst older men and is associated with lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction; these symptoms can be burdensome and negatively affect quality of life. Various surgical and pharmaceutical treatment options exist but there is a paucity of qualitative research exploring men's decision-making when seeking BPH treatment. This study qualitatively explored men's experience of living with BPH and seeking treatment for BPH. Twenty men (aged 52-75) were recruited from outpatient urology clinics at a hospital trust in Southern England. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews (via video or telephone call) and were audio-recorded; transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes were generated: 'Impacts are about more than just physical symptoms', 'The path towards treatment', 'The process of information gathering' and 'Navigating hopes, fears and uncertainty'. Results indicate most men appear to seek treatment for BPH following a gradual, and sometimes lengthy, period of deterioration in symptoms; for some men, however, treatment seeking follows an acute episode of sudden or severe symptoms. The decision to proceed with surgical or minimally invasive treatment options appears to be dependent on men reaching a tipping point; they no longer perceive their symptoms as tolerable and feel their ability to cope with symptoms is reduced. Men each bring their own set of concerns and preferences about side effects and risk-benefit profiles of different treatments. Clinicians need to be sensitive to these individual differences and incorporate them into shared decision-making for choosing between treatment options for BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Husted
- Department of Psychology, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
| | - Debra Gray
- Department of Psychology, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
| | - Sarah E. Golding
- Department of Psychology, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Psychology, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reddy D, Dudderidge T, Shah T, McCracken S, Arya M, Fiorentino F, Day E, Prevost A, Emberton M, Staffurth J, Sandhu S, Hindley R, Arumainayagam N, Sydes MR, Khoo V, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Comparative healthcare research outcomes of novel Surgery in prostate cancer (IP4-CHRONOS): Pilot RCT assessing feasibility of randomization for focal therapy in localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5086 Background: Randomised comparative data is lacking for focal therapy in localised prostate cancer. Imperial Prostate 4 CHRONOS (IP4- CHRONOS) is an RCT designed to reflect patient and physician equipoise to maximise acceptance to randomisation. Methods: Patients and physicians could opt for CHRONOS-A or CHRONOS-B. CHRONOS-A randomised between focal therapy (HIFU/cryotherapy) and radical therapy (radiation/prostatectomy). Using a multi-arm-multistage design, CHRONOS-B randomised between focal and focal combined with neoadjuvant medication (3 months of either finasteride or bicalutamide). We report the pilot phase outcomes on feasibility of randomisation. IP4-CHRONOS had ethics committee approval and was registered (ISRCTN17796995). Results: Due to impact of COVID-19, the target for CHRONOS-A was modified from 60 to 36; 36 patients were randomised over 24 months from 7 sites (Nov/2019-Nov/2021). CHRONOS-B randomised 64 patients over 14 months across 6 sites (Dec/2019-Feb/2021). Median (IQR) age and PSA (ng/ml) for CHRONOS-A were 69 (65-72) years and 6 (5-7) and for 66 (60.5-70) years and 6 (4-7) for CHRONOS-B, respectively. 34/36 (94%) and 60/64 (94%) had ISUP Grade Group > / = 2, respectively. 4/18 (22%) randomised to radical in CHRONOS-A withdrew consent; 1/22 (5%) randomised to focal withdrew. In CHRONOS-B, only 1/21 (5%) randomised to focal alone, and another randomised to focal with neoadjuvant bicalutamide withdrew. A qualitative recruitment intervention partially improved accrual to CHRONOS-A. Conclusions: IP4-CHRONOS evaluated patient and physician equipoise regarding focal therapy. Randomising between focal and radical therapy is not feasible due to strong patient preferences. A multi-arm, multi-stage RCT investigating the role of neoadjuvant agents combined with focal therapy is feasible. Clinical trial information: 17796995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Manit Arya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Emily Day
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nim Arumainayagam
- Department of Urology, Ashford and St Peters Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reddy D, Peters M, Shah T, van Son M, Bertoncelli MT, Huber P, Lomas D, Rakauskas A, Miah S, Eldred-Evans D, Guillaumier S, Hosking-Jervis F, Engle R, Dudderidge T, Hindley R, Emara A, Nigam R, McCartan N, Valerio M, Afzal N, Lewi H, Orczyk C, Ogden C, Shergill I, Persad R, Virdi J, McCracken S, Greene D, Moore C, Arya M, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed H. MP55-06 FOCAL ABLATIVE SALVAGE THERAPY FOR RADIO-RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: 6 YEAR ONCOLOGICAL AND SAFETY OUTCOMES. J Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002634.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
8
|
Whiting D, Noureldin M, Abdelmotagly Y, Johnston MJ, Brittain J, Rajkumar G, Emara A, Hindley R. Real-world Early Outcomes and Retreatment Rates Following Water Vapour Ablative Therapy for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 39:72-78. [PMID: 35528787 PMCID: PMC9068731 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rezūm water vapour ablation is an effective minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of bladder outflow obstruction. Objective To present early outcomes and reoperation rates after Rezūm, including an analysis of retreatment rates to gain an insight into optimal patient selection and the durability of the procedure. Design, setting, and participants Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing Rezūm for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between March 2017 and January 2020 at two hospital sites. Intervention Rezūm treatment of the prostate. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Patients were reviewed at 6 wk and 3, 6, and 12 mo after their Rezūm procedure. We evaluated changes in urinary symptoms and the retreatment rate. Results and limitations A total of 461 patients undergoing Rezūm were analysed. The mean (±standard deviation) follow-up duration was 16.7 ± 10.4 mo. The mean patient age was 67.5 ± 7.8 yr and the mean prostate volume was 56.5 ± 24.0 ml. There was a significant improvement in mean maximum flow rate and postvoid residual volume and in International Prostate Symptom Score and quality-of-life scores (p < 0.0001). During the follow-up period, 21 patients (4.6%) required retreatment, of which 11 cases (2.4%) were within the first year. The retreatments included eight bladder neck incisions or resections, six transurethral resections of the prostate, four Greenlight laser photoselective vaporisations of the prostate, and three Rezūm procedures. The median length of time to a further operation was 11.5 mo (range 3–34). The most common findings at reoperation were an inadequately treated median lobe, an obstructing bladder neck, and in some cases asymmetry of the prostate cavity or recesses within the prostate gland. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the beneficial effects of Rezūm observed in the pivotal phase 2 randomised study are transferable to a real-world population with a comparable early retreatment rate. A range of procedures were used for retreatment. The factors dictating which option to select were based on patient concerns regarding side effects, gland volume, symptom profile, and cystoscopy findings. Patient summary We investigated outcomes for patients undergoing Rezūm, a water vapour treatment to reduce the size of the prostate in men with obstruction of the bladder outlet because of benign prostate enlargement. This technique yields significant improvements in symptoms and preserves sexual function. The proportion of men needing retreatment was 2.4% in the first year after their Rezūm procedure.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to give a brief description of the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). RECENT FINDINGS In recent years technological advances have made the implementation of MISTs in the armamentarium of BPO surgery possible and in many cases could replace standard procedures.These techniques offer many advantages -short recovery time, rapid symptomatic relief, few adverse effects, lower risk of sexual/ejaculatory dysfunction, acceptable durability and most can be performed as an outpatient procedure.Many of the newer MISTs can be performed outside the operating room under local anesthesia, hence the term office-based MIST. SUMMARY A tailored BPO surgical treatment should not only take into account the prostate volume, but also many other factors including possible adverse events and the patient's expectations.Further studies and long-term data are necessary to standardize methods for evaluating the outcomes of these new procedures and to see which will pass the test of time and end-up replacing the gold standard procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Rijo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Quiron Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | - Thorsten Bach
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Western Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Whiting D, Noureldin M, Abdelmotagly Y, Butler D, Gehring T, Nedas T, Emara A, Hindley R. Rezum water vapour therapy: Understanding retreatment. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)00447-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
11
|
Shah T, Kanthabalan A, Pavlou M, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams N, Haroon A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley R, Virdi J, Arya M, Mitra A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore C, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed H. MRI and targeted biopsies compared to transperineal mapping biopsies for targeted ablation in recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: Primary outcomes of the FORECAST trial. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)01566-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Reddy D, Peters M, Shah T, Van Son M, Huber P, Lomas D, Rakauskas A, Miah S, Guillaumier S, Dudderidge T, Hindley R, Emara A, Nigam R, Valerio M, Afzal N, Lewi H, Orczyk C, Ogden C, Persad R, Virdi J, Moore C, Arya M, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed H. Cancer control outcomes following focal therapy using HIFU in 1,829 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer treated over 15 years. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)01427-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
13
|
|
14
|
Carmona Echeverria LM, Haider A, Freeman A, Stopka-Farooqui U, Rosenfeld A, Simpson BS, Hu Y, Hawkes D, Pye H, Heavey S, Stavrinides V, Norris JM, Bosaily AES, Cardona Barrena C, Bott S, Brown L, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, Henderson A, Hindley R, Kaplan R, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Ghei M, Persad R, Punwani S, Rosario D, Shergill I, Winkler M, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Whitaker HC. A critical evaluation of visual proportion of Gleason 4 and maximum cancer core length quantified by histopathologists. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17177. [PMID: 33057024 PMCID: PMC7561724 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73524-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Gleason score 7 prostate cancer with a higher proportion of pattern 4 (G4) has been linked to genomic heterogeneity and poorer patient outcome. The current assessment of G4 proportion uses estimation by a pathologist, with a higher proportion of G4 more likely to trigger additional imaging and treatment over active surveillance. This estimation method has been shown to have inter-observer variability. Fifteen patients with Prostate Grade Group (GG) 2 (Gleason 3 + 4) and fifteen patients with GG3 (Gleason 4 + 3) disease were selected from the PROMIS study with 192 haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides scanned. Two experienced uropathologists assessed the maximum cancer core length (MCCL) and G4 proportion using the current standard method (visual estimation) followed by detailed digital manual annotation of each G4 area and measurement of MCCL (planimetric estimation) using freely available software by the same two experts. We aimed to compare visual estimation of G4 and MCCL to a pathologist-driven digital measurement. We show that the visual and digital MCCL measurement differs up to 2 mm in 76.6% (23/30) with a high degree of agreement between the two measurements; Visual gave a median MCCL of 10 ± 2.70 mm (IQR 4, range 5–15 mm) compared to digital of 9.88 ± 3.09 mm (IQR 3.82, range 5.01–15.7 mm) (p = 0.64) The visual method for assessing G4 proportion over-estimates in all patients, compared to digital measurements [median 11.2% (IQR 38.75, range 4.7–17.9%) vs 30.4% (IQR 18.37, range 12.9–50.76%)]. The discordance was higher as the amount of G4 increased (Bias 18.71, CI 33.87–48.75, r 0.7, p < 0.0001). Further work on assessing actual G4 burden calibrated to clinical outcomes might lead to the use of differing G4 thresholds of significance if the visual estimation is used or by incorporating semi-automated methods for G4 burden measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Maria Carmona Echeverria
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK. .,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
| | - Aiman Haider
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospital, 60 Whitfield Street, London, W1T4EU, UK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospital, 60 Whitfield Street, London, W1T4EU, UK
| | - Urszula Stopka-Farooqui
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Avi Rosenfeld
- Department of Computer Science, Jerusalem College of Technology, Havaad Haleumi 21, Givat Mordechai, 91160, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Benjamin S Simpson
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Yipeng Hu
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - David Hawkes
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Hayley Pye
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Susan Heavey
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Vasilis Stavrinides
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Joseph M Norris
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.,Department of Radiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Cristina Cardona Barrena
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Simon Bott
- Department Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Portsmouth Road, Camberley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ, UK
| | - Louise Brown
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Nick Burns-Cox
- Department of Urology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Alastair Henderson
- Department of Urology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Hermitage Lane, Tunbridge Wells, ME16 9QQ, UK
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, UK
| | - Richard Kaplan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.,Department of Radiology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Robert Oldroyd
- Public and Patient Representative, 19 Exbury Gardens, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7SL, UK
| | - Maneesh Ghei
- Department of Urology, Whittington Health NHS Trust, Magdala Avenue, London, N19 5NF, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.,Department of Radiology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2JF, UK
| | - Iqbal Shergill
- Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital NHS Trust, Croesnewydd Road, Wrexham, LL13 7TD, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Department of Urology, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.,Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Hayley C Whitaker
- Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics Group, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bosaily AES, Frangou E, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Punwani S, Kaplan R, Brown LC, Freeman A, Jameson C, Hindley R, Peppercorn D, Thrower A, Winkler M, Barwick T, Stewart V, Burns-Cox N, Burn P, Ghei M, Kumaradevan J, Prasad R, Ash-Miles J, Shergill I, Agarwal S, Rosario D, Salim F, Bott S, Evans H, Henderson A, Ghosh S, Dudderidge T, Smart J, Tung K, Kirkham A. Additional Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Sequences in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data from the PROMIS Study. Eur Urol 2020; 78:503-511. [PMID: 32312543 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) is established in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but the need for enhanced sequences has recently been questioned. OBJECTIVE To assess whether dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) improves accuracy over T2 and diffusion sequences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS PROMIS was a multicentre, multireader trial, with, in this part, 497 biopsy-naïve men undergoing standardised 1.5T MP-MRI using T2, diffusion, and DCE, followed by a detailed transperineal prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy at 5 mm intervals. Likert scores of 1-5 for the presence of a significant tumour were assigned in strict sequence, for (1) T2 + diffusion and then (2) T2 + diffusion + dynamic contrast-enhanced images. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS For the primary analysis, the primary PROMIS outcome measure (Gleason score ≥4 + 3 or ≥6 mm maximum cancer length) on TPM was used, and an MRI score of ≥3 was considered positive. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Sensitivity without and with DCE was 94% and 95%, specificity 37% and 38%, positive predictive value 51% and 51%, and negative predictive value 90% and 91%, respectively (p > 0.05 in each case). The number of patients avoiding biopsy (scoring 1-2) was similar (123/497 vs 121/497, p = 0.8). The number of equivocal scores (3/5) was slightly higher without DCE (32% vs 28% p = 0.031). The proportion of MRI equivocal (3/5) and positive (4-5) cases showing significant tumours were similar (23% and 71% vs 20% and 69%). No cases of dominant Gleason 4 or higher were missed with DCE, compared with a single case with T2 + diffusion-weighted imaging. No attempt was made to correlate lesion location on MRI and histology, which may be considered a limitation. Radiologists were aware of the patient's prostate-specific antigen. CONCLUSIONS Contrast adds little when MP-MRI is used to exclude significant prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY An intravenous injection of contrast may not be necessary when magnetic resonance imaging is used as a test to rule out significant tumours in the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Imperial College London Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Alex Freeman
- University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles Jameson
- University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College London Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tara Barwick
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College London Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Victoria Stewart
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College London Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nick Burns-Cox
- Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Paul Burn
- Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Simon Bott
- Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK
| | - Hywel Evans
- Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK
| | | | - Sukanya Ghosh
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - J Smart
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Ken Tung
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Paramore L, Yang B, Abdelmotagly Y, Noureldin M, McLean D, Rajkumar G, Adamson A, Emara A, White C, Hindley R, Nedas T. Delivering urgent urological surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: outcomes from our initial 52 patients. BJU Int 2020; 126:248-251. [PMID: 32410333 PMCID: PMC7272877 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Paramore
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Bob Yang
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Yehia Abdelmotagly
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Mohamed Noureldin
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Duncan McLean
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Govindaraj Rajkumar
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Andrew Adamson
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Amr Emara
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Christopher White
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Richard Hindley
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | - Timothy Nedas
- Urology Department, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cathcart P, Moore C, Ahmed H, Leslie T, Arya M, Hindley R, Cahill F, Prendergast A, Coetzee C, Yogeswaran Y, Sooriakumaran P, Emberton M. Functional outcomes from the Robotic surgery After Focal Therapy (RAFT) clinical trial. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33798-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
18
|
Stavrinides V, Norris J, Bott S, Brown L, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, El-Shater Bosaily A, Frangou E, Freeman A, Ghei M, Henderson A, Hindley R, Kaplan R, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Persad R, Punwani S, Rosario D, Shergill I, Carmona L, Winkler M, Whitaker H, Ahmed H, Emberton M. MRI index lesions in the cancerous prostate: How do they differ from false positive phenotypes? Lessons from the PROMIS study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33748-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
19
|
Miah S, Hosking-Jervis F, Connor MJ, Eldred-Evans D, Shah TT, Arya M, Barber N, Bhardwa J, Bott S, Burke D, Doherty A, Foster C, Freeman A, Hindley R, Jameson C, Karim O, Laniado M, Montgomery B, Nigam R, Punwani S, Sinclair A, Winkler M, Allen C, Ahmed HU. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:262-269. [PMID: 31411968 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to obtain tissue from men with suspected prostate cancer (PC). OBJECTIVE To report a multicentre series of image-fusion transperineal prostate biopsies and compare the diagnostic yield of clinically significant PC (csPC) between targeted and nontargeted biopsies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study included 640 consecutive patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) presenting for first biopsy or following a previous negative transrectal biopsy under the care of 13 urologists in 11 centres in the UK (April 2014-June 2017). INTERVENTION Multiparametric MRI was carried out in 61 approved prostate MRI centres with transperineal targeted alone (n=283) or targeted plus nontargeted (n=357) transperineal rigid image-fusion targeted biopsy (MIM-Symphony-DX). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Rates of csPC and insignificant cancer detection in targeted and nontargeted biopsies were measured using a number of thresholds to define clinical significance. The primary definition was Gleason≥4+3 or any grade ≥6mm. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The mean age, median PSA, and median prostate volume for the cohort were 63.8yr (standard deviation [SD] 8.4), 6.3 ng/ml (SD 5.8), and 42.0cm3 (SD 24.7), respectively. Overall, 276/640 men (43.1%) were diagnosed with csPC. csPC was detected from targeted biopsies alone in 263/640 cases (41.1%). Of the 357 men who underwent nontargeted biopsies, three (0.8%) had csPC exclusively in nontargeted cores, with no evidence of cancer in targeted cores. Overall, 32/357 (9.0%) had csPC in nontargeted biopsies regardless of the targeted biopsy findings. Clinically insignificant disease in nontargeted biopsies was detected in 93/357 men (26.1%). Our findings were consistent across all other thresholds of clinical significance. Limitations include the lack of nontargeted biopsies in all men. CONCLUSIONS In this large multicentre series, nontargeted prostate biopsy cores had a low yield of csPC and a high yield of clinically insignificant PC. An image-fusion targeted-biopsy-only approach maintains high detection for csPC and low detection of clinically insignificant cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we found that following prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted transperineal biopsies of suspicious areas, the clinical value of performing additional extensive unguided biopsies of nonsuspicious areas is limited and can often find insignificant cancers that do not need treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saiful Miah
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Feargus Hosking-Jervis
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martin J Connor
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Eldred-Evans
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Neil Barber
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Simon Bott
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | - Daniel Burke
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Omer Karim
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marc Laniado
- The Prostate Unit, BUPA Cromwell Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Raj Nigam
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Charing Cross Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reddy D, Shah TT, van Son M, Guillaumier S, Hosking-Jervis F, Dudderidge T, McCracken S, Nigam R, Hindley R, McCartan N, Afzal N, Lewi H, Persad R, Virdi J, Orczyk C, Moore C, Arya M, Emberton M, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Oncological outcomes of 356 patients undergoing salvage focal ablative HIFU or cryotherapy following radiation failure. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5582 Background: Patients that have previously failed radiotherapy for prostate cancer is usually limited to systemic therapy due to morbidity from salvage prostatectomy. We reviewed the outcomes following focal salvage ablative therapy with HIFU or cryotherapy within the UK’s HEAT and ICE registries. Methods: 356 consecutive patients underwent focal ablative treatment after initial radiation treatment failure (28/1/2004-1/10/2019, 194 (54.5%) underwent HIFU (posterior recurrence) and 162 (45.5%) underwent cryotherapy (mostly anterior or T3b). Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) defined as no systemic therapy, whole-gland treatment, metastases or prostate cancer-specific death. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and overall survival. Results: Median (IQR) age was 69years (65-73) and PSA (IQR) was 4.0ng/ml (1-7-7.2). Overall median (IQR) follow-up was 41.3 months (21.4-58.5). Quadrant ablation was performed in 128 (36.0%), hemi-ablation performed in 64 (18.0%), hockey-stick in 5 (1.4%) and 159 (43.8%) had unknown ablative patterns. Due to histological or MRI proven recurrence/residual disease, 31 (8.7%) underwent further focal salvage re-treatment. FFS (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 81% (76-87%) and 75% (68-83%) respectively. Median (IQR) time to failure was 15.5 months (19.7). Overall survival (95%CI) at 3 and 6 years were 97% (95-100%) and 88% (81-96%) respectively. Prostate-specific mortality was 2.8%. Overall 3 (0.8%) patients were managed for fistula formation, 16 (4.5%) were treated for UTIs. Conclusions: Salvage focal ablative therapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer is safe and provides good short to medium-term oncological control. The FORECAST study is awaited to further determine oncological outcomes in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Raj Nigam
- University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naveed Afzal
- Dorset County Hampshire NHS Trust, Dorchester, United Kingdom
| | - Henry Lewi
- Springfield Hospital, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Persad
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jaspal Virdi
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Manit Arya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lovegrove CE, Miah S, El-Shater Bosaily A, Bott S, Brown L, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, Freeman A, Henderson A, Hindley R, Kaplan R, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Persad R, Punwani S, Rosario D, Shergill I, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial. J Urol 2020; 203:100-107. [PMID: 31335254 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the performance of transrectal ultrasound guided systematic and transperineal template mapping biopsies with a 5 mm sampling frame stratified by the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Likert score in the PROMIS (Prostate MR Imaging Study). MATERIALS AND METHODS Biopsy naïve men due to undergo prostate biopsy for elevated prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and transperineal template mapping and transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsies, which were performed and reported while blinded to other test results. Clinically significant prostate cancer was primarily defined as Gleason 4 + 3 or greater, or a maximum cancer core length of 6 mm or more of any grade. It was secondarily defined as Gleason 3 + 4 or greater, or a maximum cancer core length of 4 mm or more of any grade. RESULTS In 41 months 740 men were recruited at a total of 11 centers, of whom 576 underwent all 3 tests. Eight of the 150 men (5.1%) with a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging score of 1-2 had any Gleason 3 + 4 or greater disease on transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy. Of the 75 men in whom transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy showed Gleason 3 + 3 of any maximum cancer core length 61 (81%) had Gleason 3 + 4, 8 (11%) had Gleason 4 + 3 and 0 (0%) had Gleason 4 + 5 or greater disease. For definition 1 (clinically significant prostate cancer) transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy sensitivity remained stable and low across multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Likert scores of 35% to 52%. For definition 2 (clinically significant prostate cancer and any cancer) sensitivity increased with higher multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging scores. The negative predictive value varied due to varying disease prevalence but for all cancer thresholds it declined with increasing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging scores. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Likert scores 1-2 transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy revealed Gleason 3 + 4 disease in only 1 of 20 men. Further, for any clinically significant prostate cancer definition transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy had poor sensitivity and variable but a low negative predictive value across multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging scores. Men who undergo transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy without targeting in the setting of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging score of 3 to 5 should be advised to undergo repeat (targeted) biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Lovegrove
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS (National Health Service) Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saiful Miah
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS (National Health Service) Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily
- Department of Urology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial Prostate, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Bott
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, NHS Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Brown
- Department of Urology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Burns-Cox
- Department of Urology, Musgrove Park Hospital and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial Prostate, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair Henderson
- Department of Urology, Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Kaplan
- Department of Urology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial Prostate, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Oldroyd
- Public and Patient Representative, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Parker
- Department of Academic Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial Prostate, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Rosario
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Iqbal Shergill
- Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital NHS Trust, Wrexham, United Kingdom
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS (National Health Service) Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Emberton
- Department of Urology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial Prostate, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS (National Health Service) Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thorman H, Johnston M, Shah A, Peppercorn D, Emara A, Scott K, Nedas T, Hindley R. Comparing Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rates After The Introduction Of Pre-Biopsy MRI: Turning PROMIS Into Action. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
23
|
Farmer T, Johnston M, Milica A, Hindley R, Emara A. Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: a Literature Review of NIH III Prostatitis. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-019-00508-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
24
|
Hamdy FC, Elliott D, le Conte S, Davies LC, Burns RM, Thomson C, Gray R, Wolstenholme J, Donovan JL, Fitzpatrick R, Verrill C, Gleeson F, Singh S, Rosario D, Catto JW, Brewster S, Dudderidge T, Hindley R, Emara A, Sooriakumaran P, Ahmed HU, Leslie TA. Partial ablation versus radical prostatectomy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the PART feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-96. [PMID: 30264692 DOI: 10.3310/hta22520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men in the UK. Patients with intermediate-risk, clinically localised disease are offered radical treatments such as surgery or radiotherapy, which can result in severe side effects. A number of alternative partial ablation (PA) technologies that may reduce treatment burden are available; however the comparative effectiveness of these techniques has never been evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility of a RCT of PA using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) versus radical prostatectomy (RP) for intermediate-risk PCa and to test and optimise methods of data capture. DESIGN We carried out a prospective, multicentre, open-label feasibility study to inform the design and conduct of a future RCT, involving a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to understand barriers to participation. SETTING Five NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS Men with unilateral, intermediate-risk, clinically localised PCa. INTERVENTIONS Radical prostatectomy compared with HIFU. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE The randomisation of 80 men. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Findings of the QRI and assessment of data capture methods. RESULTS Eighty-seven patients consented to participate by 31 March 2017 and 82 men were randomised by 4 May 2017 (41 men to the RP arm and 41 to the HIFU arm). The QRI was conducted in two iterative phases: phase I identified a number of barriers to recruitment, including organisational challenges, lack of recruiter equipoise and difficulties communicating with patients about the study, and phase II comprised the development and delivery of tailored strategies to optimise recruitment, including group training, individual feedback and 'tips' documents. At the time of data extraction, on 10 October 2017, treatment data were available for 71 patients. Patient characteristics were similar at baseline and the rate of return of all clinical case report forms (CRFs) was 95%; the return rate of the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaire pack was 90.5%. Centres with specific long-standing expertise in offering HIFU as a routine NHS treatment option had lower recruitment rates (Basingstoke and Southampton) - with University College Hospital failing to enrol any participants - than centres offering HIFU in the trial context only. CONCLUSIONS Randomisation of men to a RCT comparing PA with radical treatments of the prostate is feasible. The QRI provided insights into the complexities of recruiting to this surgical trial and has highlighted a number of key lessons that are likely to be important if the study progresses to a main trial. A full RCT comparing clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life outcomes between radical treatments and PA is now warranted. FUTURE WORK Men recruited to the feasibility study will be followed up for 36 months in accordance with the protocol. We will design a full RCT, taking into account the lessons learnt from this study. CRFs will be streamlined, and the length and frequency of PROMs and resource use diaries will be reviewed to reduce the burden on patients and research nurses and to optimise data completeness. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99760303. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 52. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Steffi le Conte
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucy C Davies
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richéal M Burns
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire Thomson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Gray
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jane Wolstenholme
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Ray Fitzpatrick
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fergus Gleeson
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Surjeet Singh
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - James Wf Catto
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Brewster
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Amr Emara
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tom A Leslie
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Elliott D, Hamdy FC, Leslie TA, Rosario D, Dudderidge T, Hindley R, Emberton M, Brewster S, Sooriakumaran P, Catto JW, Emara A, Ahmed H, Whybrow P, le Conte S, Donovan JL. Overcoming difficulties with equipoise to enable recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of partial ablation vs radical prostatectomy for unilateral localised prostate cancer. BJU Int 2018; 122:970-977. [PMID: 29888845 PMCID: PMC6348419 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe how clinicians conceptualised equipoise in the PART (Partial prostate Ablation vs Radical prosTatectomy in intermediate-risk unilateral clinically localised prostate cancer) feasibility study and how this affected recruitment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS PART included a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to optimise recruitment. Phase I aimed to understand recruitment, and included: scrutinising recruitment data, interviewing the trial management group and recruiters (n = 13), and audio-recording recruitment consultations (n = 64). Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis methods. In Phase II, strategies to improve recruitment were developed and delivered. RESULTS Initially many recruiters found it difficult to maintain a position of equipoise and held preconceptions about which treatment was best for particular patients. They did not feel comfortable about approaching all eligible patients, and when the study was discussed, biases were conveyed through the use of terminology, poorly balanced information, and direct treatment recommendations. Individual and group feedback led to presentations to patients becoming clearer and enabled recruiters to reconsider their sense of equipoise. Although the precise impact of the QRI alone cannot be determined, recruitment increased (from a mean [range] of 1.4 [0-4] to 4.5 [0-12] patients/month) and the feasibility study reached its recruitment target. CONCLUSION Although clinicians find it challenging to recruit patients to a trial comparing different contemporary treatments for prostate cancer, training and support can enable recruiters to become more comfortable with conveying equipoise and providing clearer information to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy Elliott
- Population Health SciencesBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Tom A. Leslie
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Department of Oncology and MetabolismUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | | | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Simon Brewster
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - James W.F. Catto
- Department of Oncology and MetabolismUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Amr Emara
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBasingstokeUK
| | - Hashim Ahmed
- Imperial UrologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Paul Whybrow
- Population Health SciencesBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Steffi le Conte
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- Population Health SciencesBristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals Bristol NHS TrustBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shah TT, Peters M, Guillaumier S, Arya M, Afzal N, Hosking-Jervis F, Dudderidge T, Hindley R, Lewi H, McCartan N, Moore CM, Nigam R, Ogden C, Persad R, Shah K, Virdi J, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU, Minhas S. MP30-11 PREDICTORS OF POOR FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER FOCAL HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU). J Urol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
27
|
Pai A, Hussain M, Hindley R, Emara A, Barber N. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Transurethral Circumferential Excision of the Ureteral Orifice for Urothelial Carcinoma. J Endourol 2017; 31:651-654. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aakash Pai
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
| | - Muddassar Hussain
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Amr Emara
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Neil Barber
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Leslie T, Davies L, Elliott D, Brewster S, Sooriakumaran P, Rosario D, Catto J, Dudderidge T, Ahmed H, Emberton M, Hindley R, Donovan J, Gray R, Hamdy F. PD56-08 THE PART TRIAL - A PHASE III STUDY COMPARING PARTIAL PROSTATE ABLATION VERSUS RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (PART) IN INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER – EARLY DATA FROM THE FEASIBILITY STUDY. J Urol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
29
|
Soares R, Bott S, Hindley R, McGregor R, Eden C. MP40-02 SHORT-TERM RESULTS OF EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN 1,000 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
30
|
Guillaumier S, Hamid S, Charman S, Charman S, van der Meulen J, McCartan N, Shah K, Hindley R, Nigam R, Dudderidge T, Afzal N, Cornaby A, Lewi H, Persad R, Virdi J, Moore C, Arya M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. MP18-08 FOCAL HIFU FOR TREATMENT OF LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTI-CENTRE REGISTRY EXPERIENCE. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - H Lewi
- Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peters M, Shah T, Kanthabalan A, McCartan N, van der Voort van Zyp J, Moerland M, van Vulpen M, Hindley R, Emberton M, Ahmed H. MP18-02 DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNAL VALIDATION OF A MULTIVARIABLE PREDICTION MODEL FOR BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER FOCAL SALVAGE HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: PRESENTATION OF A RISK SCORE FOR INDIVIDUAL PATIENT PROGNOSIS. J Urol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
32
|
Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d’Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyère F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi NK, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitán C, Knispel H, Bachmann A. A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing GreenLight-XPS Laser Vaporization of the Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Two-yr Outcomes of the GOLIATH Study. Eur Urol 2016; 69:94-102. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
33
|
Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d' Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink J, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyere F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi N, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitan C, Knispel H, Bachmann A. PD5-10 TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE (GL-XPS OR TURP) DOES NOT RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT IMPAIRMENT OF ERECTILE FUNCTION. J Urol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
34
|
Donaldson IA, Alonzi R, Barratt D, Barret E, Berge V, Bott S, Bottomley D, Eggener S, Ehdaie B, Emberton M, Hindley R, Leslie T, Miners A, McCartan N, Moore CM, Pinto P, Polascik TJ, Simmons L, van der Meulen J, Villers A, Willis S, Ahmed HU. Focal therapy: patients, interventions, and outcomes--a report from a consensus meeting. Eur Urol 2015; 67:771-7. [PMID: 25281389 PMCID: PMC4410301 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 09/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal therapy as a treatment option for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is an increasingly popular and rapidly evolving field. OBJECTIVE To gather expert opinion on patient selection, interventions, and meaningful outcome measures for focal therapy in clinical practice and trial design. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Fifteen experts in focal therapy followed a modified two-stage RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Methodology process. All participants independently scored 246 statements prior to rescoring at a face-to-face meeting. The meeting occurred in June 2013 at the Royal Society of Medicine, London, supported by the Wellcome Trust and the UK Department of Health. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Agreement, disagreement, or uncertainty were calculated as the median panel score. Consensus was derived from the interpercentile range adjusted for symmetry level. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 246 statements, 154 (63%) reached consensus. Items of agreement included the following: patients with intermediate risk and patients with unifocal and multifocal PCa are eligible for focal treatment; magnetic resonance imaging-targeted or template-mapping biopsy should be used to plan treatment; planned treatment margins should be 5mm from the known tumor; prostate volume or age should not be a primary determinant of eligibility; foci of indolent cancer can be left untreated when treating the dominant index lesion; histologic outcomes should be defined by targeted biopsy at 1 yr; residual disease in the treated area of ≤3 mm of Gleason 3+3 did not need further treatment; and focal retreatment rates of ≤20% should be considered clinically acceptable but subsequent whole-gland therapy deemed a failure of focal therapy. All statements are expert opinion and therefore constitute level 5 evidence and may not reflect wider clinical consensus. CONCLUSIONS The landscape of PCa treatment is rapidly evolving with new treatment technologies. This consensus meeting provides guidance to clinicians on current expert thinking in the field of focal therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report we present expert opinion on patient selection, interventions, and meaningful outcomes for clinicians working in focal therapy for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian A Donaldson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Roberto Alonzi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dean Barratt
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Viktor Berge
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Simon Bott
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK
| | - David Bottomley
- Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Scott Eggener
- Section of Urology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Tom Leslie
- Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alec Miners
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lucy Simmons
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Huriez, CHRU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Sarah Willis
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Guillaumier S, McCartan N, Dickinson L, Fatola Y, Freeman A, Hindley R, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Does focal high-intensity focused ultrasound have a role in treating localized prostate cancer in the elderly? J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
133 Background: There is an increase in the ageing population leading a significant proportion of men diagnosed with prostate cancer being over 75 years of age. Misconceptions regarding treating the elderly are still rife. The body of evidence that has recently emerged shows that this cohort of patients should be offered the same curative therapies as their counterparts. This study looks at the feasibility of focal HIFU in treating localised prostate cancer in those aged over 75 years of age. Methods: Our independent academic HIFU registry incorporates a total of 60 patients who were diagnosed with low, intermediate and high risk localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage T2a-T3aN0M0 and treated with focal HIFU using Sonablate500, between 2004 and 2014. We divided the patient cohort into those that were treated within the remit of a trial protocol, and those that were not. Results: As biochemical failure is difficult to define, we looked at the medium-term transition rates to redo HIFU, local salvage and systemic therapy. 12% required re-treatment with HIFU. 8% transitioned into local salvage or systemic therapy of which 1 patient had radiotherapy and 4 were subsequently treated with androgen deprivation therapy). The table below outlines the complication rates associated with focal HIFU. Conclusions: Focal HIFU has been shown to be both feasible and effective in the elderly population. It is a safe modality of treatment to use in this patient cohort with a low complication profile. Long-term studies are however necessary. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Yomi Fatola
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Freeman
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Hashim Uddin Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d’Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyère F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi NK, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitán C, Knispel H, Thomas JA. A European Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing 180 W GreenLight XPS Laser Vaporization and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 12-Month Results of the GOLIATH Study. J Urol 2015; 193:570-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bachmann
- Department of Urology Basel, University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Tubaro
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Neil Barber
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, Camberley
| | - Frank d’Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gordon Muir
- Department of Urology, King’s College Hospital and King’s Health Partners, London
| | - Ulrich Witzsch
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Joan Benejam
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Manacor, Manacor, Spain
| | | | - Antony Riddick
- Department of Urology, Lothian University Hospitals Division, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - Sascha Pahernik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Herman Roelink
- Department of Urology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo/Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Filip Ameye
- Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Christian Saussine
- Department of Urology, Nouvel Hopital Civil de Strasbourg, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Franck Bruyère
- Department of Urology, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, Loire Valley and Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre- Val de Loire Université, Val de Loire, France
| | - Wolfgang Loidl
- Department of Urology, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Tim Larner
- Department of Urology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton
| | - Nirjan-Kumar Gogoi
- Department of Urology, Mid Yorkshire NHS Trust, Dewsbury & District Hospital, Dewsbury
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire
| | - Rolf Muschter
- Department of Urology, Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg, Rotenburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - Nitin Shrotri
- Department of Urology, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Kent
| | - Stuart Graham
- Department of Urology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London
| | - Moritz Hamann
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Martin Schostak
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Carlos Capitán
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Helmut Knispel
- Department of Urology, Uro-Forschungs GmbH im St. Hedwig Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | - J. Andrew Thomas
- Department of Urology, ABMU LHB, Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, Wales
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yap T, Ahmed H, Hindley R, McCartan N, Charman S, Guillaumier S, Dickinson L, Emberton M, Minhas S. MP45-15 A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF FOCAL THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER ON ERECTILE FUNCTION FROM A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF 3 PROSPECTIVE TRIALS. J Urol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.1212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
38
|
Hindley R. Bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: evaluation of impact on overall sexual function in an international randomized controlled setting. BJU Int 2013; 112:7-9. [PMID: 23759006 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11770.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
39
|
Dickinson L, Ahmed H, McCartan N, Weir S, Hindley R, Lewi H, Cornaby A, Nathan S, Persad R, Ogden C, Emberton M. 553 FIVE YEAR ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING WHOLE-GLAND PRIMARY HIFU FROM THE UK INDEPENDENT HIFU REGISTRY. J Urol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
40
|
Emara A, Maiti R, Bott S, Khan S, Nedas T, Hindley R. 2217 VALIDATION OF PSA FREE TO TOTAL RATIO AND PSA DENSITY AGAINST TEMPLATE BIOPSIES OF PROSTATE. J Urol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
41
|
Zakri R, Magrill D, Emaru A, Kommu S, Hindley R, Barber N. UP-01.210 Benefits of Embarking on a Robotic Nephro-Ureterectomy Programme for Surgeon and Patient. Urology 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Magrill D, Emara A, Zakri R, Kommu S, Hindley R, Barber N. UP-03.149 Endoscopic Circumferential Mobilization of Distal Ureter in Laparoscopic Nephro-Ureterectomy: A Safe Option for Suspected Cancer. Urology 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
43
|
Pandha H, Ismail M, Boxall A, Bhatt A, Langley S, Hindley R, Morgan R. 2326 ENGRAILED-2 (EN2): A URINARY BIOMARKER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER WITHOUT DRE. J Urol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
44
|
Morgan R, Boxall A, Bhatt A, Bailey M, Hindley R, Langley S, Whitaker HC, Neal DE, Ismail M, Whitaker H, Annels N, Michael A, Pandha H. Engrailed-2 (EN2): a tumor specific urinary biomarker for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:1090-8. [PMID: 21364037 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-2410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cause of cancer related death in men. A number of key limitations with prostate specific antigen (PSA), currently the standard detection test, has justified evaluation of new biomarkers. We have assessed the diagnostic potential of Engrailed-2 (EN2) protein, a homeodomain-containing transcription factor expressed in PC cell lines and secreted into the urine by PC in men. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN EN2 expression in PC cell lines and prostate cancer tissue was determined by semi-quantative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. First pass urine [without prior digital rectal examination (DRE)] was collected from men presenting with urinary symptoms (referred to exclude/confirm the presence of prostate cancer) and from controls. EN2 protein was measured by ELISA in urine from men with PC (n = 82) and controls (n = 102). RESULTS EN2 was expressed and secreted by PC cell lines and PC tissue but not by normal prostate tissue or stroma. The presence of EN2 in urine was highly predictive of PC, with a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 88.2%, without requirement for DRE. There was no correlation with PSA levels. These results were confirmed independently by a second academic center. CONCLUSIONS Urinary EN2 is a highly specific and sensitive candidate biomarker of prostate cancer. A larger multicenter study to further evaluate the diagnostic potential of EN2 is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Morgan
- Postgraduate Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Blick C, Bott S, Muneer A, Barber NJ, Hindley R, Eden C, Sullivan M. Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: A Three-Center Retrospective Analysis. J Endourol 2010; 24:1451-5. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Blick
- Department of Urology, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Bott
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, United Kingdom
| | - Asif Muneer
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil J. Barber
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Eden
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Sullivan
- Department of Urology, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Arumainayagam N, Allen C, Moore C, Barber N, Hindley R, Muir G, Trachtenberg J, Cormier L, Barret E, Azzouzi A, Villers A, Emberton M. 936 TOOKAD ® SOLUBLE (PADELIPORFIN) SECOND GENERATION VASCULAR TARGETED PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY (VTP) FOR PROSTATE CANCER: SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(10)60916-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
47
|
Allen DJ, Hindley R, Clovis S, O'Donnell P, Cahill D, Rottenberg G, Popert R. Does body-coil magnetic-resonance imaging have a role in the preoperative staging of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer? BJU Int 2004; 94:534-8. [PMID: 15329107 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05023.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the accuracy and use of body-coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-six patients undergoing RP were staged before surgery using body-coil MRI; none was denied surgery on the basis of their scan results. All scans were reported before RP by one of three consultant radiologists and afterward by a colleague with a special interest in prostate MRI, unaware of the patients' clinical details. RESULTS The overall sensitivity of MRI at detecting extracapsular extension was 50% on general reporting and 72% when reported by the specialist radiologist; the respective specificities were 84% and 86%. Of the 55 patients included in the study, 18 (33%) had extracapsular disease on histological analysis. MRI was most accurate in the 17 patients at high-risk (prostate-specific antigen, PSA, >10 ng/mL and Gleason score >or= 8) and eight at intermediate risk (PSA < 10 ng/mL and Gleason score 7). In the former group with specialist analysis, the sensitivity was 100%, although this decreased to 67% with general reporting. Both gave a specificity of 82%. Intermediate risk disease gave a sensitivity and specificity of 75%, irrespective of reporting method. The ability of MRI to detect extraprostatic tumour in the 30 low-risk patients (PSA < 10 ng/mL and Gleason score 2-6) was poor; the sensitivity was 25% with general and 50% on specialist review, although both methods gave a specificity of >90%. CONCLUSION Body-coil MRI is sensitive and specific for identifying extracapsular extension of prostate cancer in patients with high- or intermediate-risk disease. Patients at low risk frequently have microscopic extension which is not detected. Opinion from a radiologist with a special interest in prostate MRI can increase the reporting accuracy even when unaware of the patients' clinical details.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darrell J Allen
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cantello B, Connor S, Dean D, Hindley R. A Versatile Route to 2-Arylmethyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolidine-3,5-diones via Regiospecific Alkylation of 1,2,4-Oxadiazolidine-3,5-dione. Synlett 1997. [DOI: 10.1055/s-1997-772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|