1
|
Popli S, Durant AM, Tyson M, Singh P. Current State of Bladder Preservation in High Grade Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and Localized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2025:10.1007/s11912-025-01657-3. [PMID: 40304944 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01657-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, new, effective bladder sparing techniques have emerged as favorable options for patients with BCG-unresponsive high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), leading to a paradigm shift from the traditional radical cystectomy in clinical practice. Our aim is to examine the evolution of these techniques, summarize the current evidence, and shed light on the future of these treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS Bladder preservation techniques offer a patient-centered approach while also demonstrating non-inferiority to radical cystectomy in terms of survival outcomes for both NMIBC and MIBC patients. Approved novel therapies, including systemic pembrolizumab and intravesical agents such as nadofaragene, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept, and cretostimogene grenadenorepvec, have shown promising results for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC patients. For carefully selected MIBC patients, Trimodal Therapy (TMT) remains an effective alternative. However, the consensus on the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to TMT and the choice of radio-sensitizing chemotherapy / fractionation schedule of radiation therapy is still under investigation. Additionally, immunotherapy in BCG-naïve patients and as part of concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in MIBC patients offers favorable early results. Bladder preservation is a feasible and increasingly preferred alternative in certain NMIBC and MIBC patients who are either unfit or unwilling for radical cystectomy. Promising novel therapies, such as immunotherapy, recombinant intravesical therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates are emerging as potential alternatives. These therapies aim to achieve good oncological outcomes while maintaining quality of life, providing an alternative to the decades long standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Popli
- Mayo Clinic, (Medical Oncology), Phoenix, (Arizona), USA
| | | | - Mark Tyson
- Mayo Clinic, (Urology), Phoenix, (Arizona), USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baudelin C, Sargos P, Dinart D, Hennequin C, Teyssonneau D, Meynard L, Vuong NS, Lefort F, Baboudjian M, Roubaud G. Concomitant chemotherapy in trimodal treatment of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review of prospective trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2025; 205:104557. [PMID: 39580059 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE For selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), trimodal therapy (TMT) incorporating transurethral resection of the tumor and chemoradiotherapy is an alternative to radical cystectomy. Concurrent chemotherapy (CC) is a pivotal component of TMT, however, the optimal CC protocol remains unknown. This systematic review aims to assess efficacy and safety outcomes of CC protocols used in TMT. METHODS A systematic literature search in the PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify eligible studies published between 1980 and March 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed following predefined criteria. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. Cisplatin-based CC protocols were the most reported. The highest level of evidence was found for 5-fluorouracil and Mitomycin C and for Carbogen-Nicotinamide. However, significant heterogeneity in patient selection, treatment modalities, follow-up and reported outcomes precluded comparison between trials. Outcomes were similar regardless of CC, with 5-year overall survival around 50 %. Bladder preservation rates ranged from 60 % to 90 %. Distant metastasis rates varied from 10 % to 45 %. Locoregional control rates seemed improved with cisplatin combinations despite an increased acute toxicity. Acute and late toxicity were however relatively low across CC protocols. There was no decrease in gastro-intestinal or urinary Quality of Life. Scarce data were available for elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS With similar efficacy and toxicity profiles, and in the absence of comparability among trials, our review does not provide sufficient data to determine the optimal CC for TMT of MIBC. TMT is a well-tolerated and efficient approach with tailored strategy available for patients with localized MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Baudelin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Amethyst Radiotherapy Group, La Garenne Colombes, France.
| | - Derek Dinart
- Clinical Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | | | - Diego Teyssonneau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Lucie Meynard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Nam-Son Vuong
- Department of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Félix Lefort
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, APHM, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France.
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pfail J, Lichtbroun B, Golombos DM, Jang TL, Packiam VT, Ghodoussipour S. The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement. Curr Opin Urol 2025; 35:115-122. [PMID: 39350629 PMCID: PMC11617270 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach. RECENT FINDINGS For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages. SUMMARY Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pfail
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin Lichtbroun
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - David M. Golombos
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas L. Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vignesh T. Packiam
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feghaly C, Challita R, Hadir HB, Mobayed T, Bitar TA, Harbi M, Ghorayeb H, El-Hassan R, Bodgi L. Bladder Cancer Treatments in the Age of Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Potential Radiosensitivity Biomarkers. Biomark Insights 2024; 19:11772719241297168. [PMID: 39512649 PMCID: PMC11542137 DOI: 10.1177/11772719241297168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in men. While cystectomy remains the primary treatment, advances in radiotherapy and chemotherapy have highlighted the value of bladder-preserving strategies, which can also enhance patients' quality of life. Despise these advances, around 20% of patients may still require salvage cystectomy due to tumor radioresistance. This underscores the need to develop radiosensitivity predictive assays. Radiotherapy acts by inducing DNA damage, primarily through DNA double-strand breaks, which can significantly affect treatment outcomes if left unrepaired. In addition to activating DNA repair pathways, the response to radiation also involves the tumor microenvironment, cell death pathways, immune responses and different types of cell death and proliferation receptors. In recent years, personalized medicine, which tailors treatments to individual patients, has gained increasing attention in cancer care. The development of chemo- and radiosensitivity predictive assays has become a key focus of cancer research. Despite the potential impact of such assays on bladder cancer treatment, there is still no reliable test that can help clinicians and informs patients in choosing the best treatment. This review aims to highlight studies that attempted to characterize bladder cancer radiosensitivity and to discuss the potential biomarkers that could be used to develop bladder cancer radiosensitivity predictive assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Feghaly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rafka Challita
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hanine Bou Hadir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tala Mobayed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tarek Al Bitar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mohammad Harbi
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hala Ghorayeb
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rana El-Hassan
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Larry Bodgi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- U1296 Unit, “Radiation: Defense, Health and Environment”, Centre Léon-Bérard, Inserm, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ben-David R, Galsky MD, Sfakianos JP. Novel bladder-sparing approaches in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Trends Mol Med 2024; 30:686-697. [PMID: 38692938 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
The pursuit of surgeons and oncologists in fulfilling the inherent desire of patients to retain their urinary bladder despite having muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has sparked years of research and multiple debates, given its aggressive nature and the high risk of fatal metastatic recurrence. Historically, several approaches to bladder-sparing treatment have been explored, ranging from radical transurethral resection to concurrent chemoradiation. A less well-established approach involves a risk-adapted approach with local therapy deferred based on the clinical response to transurethral resection followed by systemic therapy. Each approach is associated with potential risks, benefits, and trade-offs. In this review, we aim to understand, navigate, and suggest future perspectives on bladder-sparing approaches in patients with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben Ben-David
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel SA, Liu Y, Solanki AA, Baumann BC, Efstathiou JA, Jani AB, Chang AJ, Fischer-Valuck B, Royce TJ. Bladder only versus bladder plus pelvic lymph node chemoradiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:325.e15-325.e23. [PMID: 36725382 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder-sparing chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is a definitive first-line treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The optimal radiotherapy target volume, either bladder-only (BO) or bladder plus pelvic lymph nodes (BPN), remains unclear. METHODS We identified 2,104 patients in the National Cancer Database with cT2-4N0M0 urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder treated with CRT following maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor from 2004 to 2016. The exposure of interest was BO vs. BPN treatment volume. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards. Sensitivity analysis tested an interaction term for clinical T stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and radiation modality (3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy or proton therapy). Annual use of BO vs. BPN from 2004 to 2016 was compared using Cochran-Armitage test. RESULTS A total of 578 patients were treated with BO and 1,526 patients treated with BPN CRT. There was a significant increase in BPN use from 2004 to 2016 (66.9%-76.8%, P < 0.0001). With a median follow-up of 6.2 years, there was no survival difference between groups: 5- and 10-year OS 27.4% (95% CI 23.4%-31.4%) in the BO group vs. 31.9% (95% CI 29.3%-34.6%) in the BPN group, and 13.1% (95% CI 9.7%-17.1%) in the BO group vs. 13.2% (95% CI 10.6%-16.0%) in the BPN group, respectively (log-rank P = 0.10). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant association between BPN and OS (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.02, P = 0.09). On sensitivity analysis, we found no differential effect by T stage or radiation modality. CONCLUSION Use of pelvic lymph node radiation has risen in the US but may not impact long-term survival outcomes for patients with node-negative muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Optimizing radiation treatment volumes for CRT for MIBC will be important to study under prospective trials, such as the SWOG/NRG 1806.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagar A Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta GA.
| | - Yuan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| | - Abhishek A Solanki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago IL
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis MO
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Ashesh B Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta GA
| | - Albert J Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles CA
| | | | - Trevor J Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Approaches to Clinical Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Possibilities and Limitations. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041323. [PMID: 36831665 PMCID: PMC9953905 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In the surgical oncology field, the change from a past radical surgery to an organ preserving surgery is a big trend. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients eligible for cisplatin. There is a growing interest in bladder preserving strategies after NAC because good oncologic outcome has been reported for pathologic complete response (pCR) patients after NAC, and many studies have continued to discuss whether bladder preservation treatment is possible for these patients. However, in actual clinical practice, decision-making should be determined according to clinical staging and there is a gap that cannot be ignored between clinical complete response (cCR) and pCR. Currently, there is a lack in a uniform approach to post-NAC restaging of MIBC and a standardized cCR definition. In this review, we clarify the gap between cCR and pCR at the current situation and focus on emerging strategies in bladder preservation in selected patients with MIBC who achieve cCR following NAC.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lemiński A, Michalski W, Masojć B, Kaczmarek K, Małkiewicz B, Kienitz J, Zawisza-Lemińska B, Falco M, Słojewski M. Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:1560. [PMID: 36836093 PMCID: PMC9960746 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The treatment plan should be tailored to each patient's characteristics, with more intensive protocols offered to patients who are fit for surgery but opt for organ-sparing. After a thorough, debulking transurethral resection of the tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the response evaluation should trigger further management with either chemoradiation or early cystectomy in non-responders. A hypofractionated, continuous radiotherapy regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C is currently preferred based on clinical trials. The response should be evaluated with repeated transurethral resections of the tumor bed and abdominopelvic-computed tomography after chemoradiation, with quarterly assessments during the first year. Salvage cystectomy should be offered to patients fit for surgery who failed to respond to treatment or developed a muscle-invasive recurrence. Non-muscle-invasive bladder recurrences and upper tract tumors should be treated in line with guidelines for respective primary tumors. Multiparametric magnetic resonance can be used for tumor staging and response monitoring, as it may distinguish disease recurrence from treatment-induced inflammation and fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artur Lemiński
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Wojciech Michalski
- Department of Urological Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCNRIO), Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bartłomiej Masojć
- Department of Radiotherapy, West-Pomeranian Oncology Center, 71-730 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Krystian Kaczmarek
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Jakub Kienitz
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Michał Falco
- Department of Radiotherapy, West-Pomeranian Oncology Center, 71-730 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marcin Słojewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stecca C, Mitin T, Sridhar SS. The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Preservation Approaches in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:51-55. [PMID: 36517193 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Stecca
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Timur Mitin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kamran SC, Efstathiou JA. The Legacy of RTOG/NRG Protocols in Shaping Current Bladder Preservation Therapy in North America. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:26-34. [PMID: 36517191 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the historical, gold standard treatment was radical cystectomy. However, the notion of organ preservation using trimodality therapy (TMT, consisting of maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by chemoradiation) has been established as a viable treatment alternative to complete removal of the bladder. Despite the lack of direct head-to-head randomized comparisons of TMT to radical cystectomy, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/NRG has spearheaded the use of radiation therapy as part of bladder preservation for years, with prospective data demonstrating similar long-term clinical outcomes to cystectomy series, particularly with contemporary treatment. We summarize these trials and discuss the evolution of bladder preservation throughout the decades, culminating in our current TMT protocols. We further discuss the future of organ-preservation therapy in MIBC, with continued improvement in radiation techniques, incorporation of novel therapies, and personalization of treatment to optimize benefit for bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Magliocco AM, Moughan J, Miyamoto DT, Simko J, Shipley WU, Gray PJ, Hagan MP, Parliament M, Tester WJ, Zietman AL, McCarthy S, Saeed-Vafa D, Xiong Y, Ayral T, Hartford AC, Patel A, Rosenthal SA, Chafe S, Greenberg R, Schwartz MA, Augspurger ME, Keech JA, Winter KA, Feng FY, Efstathiou JA. Analysis of MRE11 and Mortality Among Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Managed With Trimodality Therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2242378. [PMID: 36383379 PMCID: PMC9669810 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Bladder-preserving trimodality therapy can be an effective alternative to radical cystectomy for treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but biomarkers are needed to guide optimal patient selection. The DNA repair protein MRE11 is a candidate response biomarker that has not been validated in prospective cohorts using standardized measurement approaches. OBJECTIVE To evaluate MRE11 expression as a prognostic biomarker in MIBC patients receiving trimodality therapy using automated quantitative image analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prognostic study analyzed patients with MIBC pooled from 6 prospective phase I/II, II, or III trials of trimodality therapy (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 8802, 8903, 9506, 9706, 9906, and 0233) across 37 participating institutions in North America from 1988 to 2007. Eligible patients had nonmetastatic MIBC and were enrolled in 1 of the 6 trimodality therapy clinical trials. Analyses were completed August 2020. EXPOSURES Trimodality therapy with transurethral bladder tumor resection and cisplatin-based chemoradiation therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES MRE11 expression and association with disease-specific (bladder cancer) mortality (DSM), defined as death from bladder cancer. Pretreatment tumor tissues were processed for immunofluorescence with anti-MRE11 antibody and analyzed using automated quantitative image analysis to calculate a normalized score for MRE11 based on nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (NC) signal ratio. RESULTS Of 465 patients from 6 trials, 168 patients had available tissue, of which 135 were analyzable for MRE11 expression (median age of 65 years [minimum-maximum, 34-90 years]; 111 [82.2%] men). Median (minimum-maximum) follow-up for alive patients was 5.0 (0.6-11.7) years. Median (Q1-Q3) MRE11 NC signal ratio was 2.41 (1.49-3.34). Patients with an MRE11 NC ratio above 1.49 (ie, above first quartile) had a significantly lower DSM (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93; P = .03). The 4-year DSM was 41.0% (95% CI, 23.2%-58.0%) for patients with an MRE11 NC signal ratio of 1.49 or lower vs 21.0% (95% CI, 13.4%-29.8%) for a ratio above 1.49. MRE11 NC signal ratio was not significantly associated with overall survival (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.49-1.44). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Higher MRE11 NC signal ratios were associated with better DSM after trimodality therapy. Lower MRE11 NC signal ratios identified a poor prognosis subgroup that may benefit from intensification of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Moughan
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center/ACR, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David T. Miyamoto
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeff Simko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - William U. Shipley
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Phillip J. Gray
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael P. Hagan
- Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Administration Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| | | | | | - Anthony L. Zietman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Yin Xiong
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | - Ashish Patel
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Camden, New Jersey
| | | | - Susan Chafe
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | - John A. Keech
- MultiCare Gig Harbor Medical Park, Gig Harbor, Washington
| | - Kathryn A. Winter
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center/ACR, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khalifa J, Roumiguié M, Pouessel D, Sargos P. [Bladder-sparing trimodal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:771-778. [PMID: 35970682 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Organ-sparing strategies in the management of local or locally advanced cancers meet a dual objective: tumor control and preservation of the function of the involved organ. Given the morbidity and mortality of cystectomy and its impact on quality of life and bladder function, bladder-sparing strategies have emerged for the management of urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer, mostly through trimodal treatment, which consists in maximal trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor, followed by chemo-radiotherapy. This review presents the modalities of trimodal treatment, before exposing the advantages and limitations of this strategy compared to cystectomy among operable patients. Despite the absence of comparative data from randomized trials, the two approaches seem to provide similar oncological results among appropriately selected patients. In modern series, the rate of salvage cystectomy is approximately 15% at 5 years; this delayed cystectomy does not seem to be associated with greater morbidity and mortality as compared to upfront cystectomy. Emphasis is placed in the review on quality of life data of these two approaches. In order to optimize the selection of patients eligible to trimodal therapy, the classical predictive factors of response to radio(chemo)therapy are critically analyzed, with the perspective of innovative molecular biomarkers. Finally, a close multidisciplinary collaboration is needed for the choice and the execution of the therapeutic strategy, and the patient should be fully involved in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Khalifa
- Département de radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Onccopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31000 Toulouse, France; Inserm U1037, équipe immunité antitumorale et immunothérapie, centre de recherche contre le cancer de Toulouse, 2, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France.
| | - M Roumiguié
- Département d'urologie, CHU de Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - D Pouessel
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Onccopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - P Sargos
- Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cour de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Greer MD, Schaub SK, Bowen SR, Liao JJ, Russell K, Chen JJ, Weg ES, Meyer J, Alving T, Schade GR, Gore JL, Psutka SP, Montgomery RB, Schweizer M, Yu EY, Grivas P, Wright JL, Zeng J. A Prospective Study of a Resorbable Intravesical Fiducial Marker for Bladder Cancer Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100858. [PMID: 35387424 PMCID: PMC8977855 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We conducted a prospective pilot study to evaluate safety and feasibility of TraceIT, a resorbable radiopaque hydrogel, to improve image guidance for bladder cancer radiation therapy (RT). Methods and Materials Patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer receiving definitive RT were eligible. TraceIT was injected intravesically around the tumor bed during maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor. The primary endpoint was the difference between radiation treatment planning margin on daily cone beam computed tomography based on alignment to TraceIT versus standard-of-care pelvic bone anatomy. The Van Herk margin formula was used to determine the optimal planning target volume margin. TraceIT visibility, recurrence rates, and survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Results The trial was fully accrued and 15 patients were analyzed. TraceIT was injected in 4 sites/patient (range, 4-6). Overall, 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-98%) of injection sites were radiographically visible at RT initiation versus 71% (95% CI, 62%-81%) at RT completion. The median duration of radiographic visibility for injection sites was 106 days (95% CI, 104-113). Most patients were treated with a standard split-course approach with initial pelvic radiation fields, then midcourse repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by bladder tumor bed boost fields, and 14/15 received concurrent chemotherapy. Alignment to fiducials could allow for reduced planning target volume margins (0.67 vs 1.56 cm) for the initial phase of RT, but not for the boost (1.01 vs 0.96 cm). This allowed for improved target coverage (D95% 80%-83% to 91%-94%) for 2 patients retrospectively planned with both volumetric-modulated arc therapy and 3-dimensional conformal RT. At median follow-up of 22 months, no acute or late complications attributable to TraceIT placement occurred. No patients required salvage cystectomy. Conclusions TraceIT intravesical fiducial placement is safe and feasible and may facilitate tumor bed delineation and targeting in patients undergoing RT for localized muscle invasive bladder cancer. Improved image guided treatment may facilitate strategies to improve local control and minimize toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stephen R. Bowen
- Radiation Oncology and
- Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tristan Alving
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - George R. Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah P. Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert B. Montgomery
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael Schweizer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Jing Zeng
- Radiation Oncology and
- Corresponding author: Jing Zeng, MD
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bladder-Sparing Approaches to Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
15
|
Fabiano E, Riou O, Pointreau Y, Périchon N, Durdux C. Role of radiotherapy in the management of bladder cancer: Recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:315-322. [PMID: 34955411 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on the indications and techniques for external beam radiotherapy for bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fabiano
- Département de radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - O Riou
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut régional du cancer, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Y Pointreau
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut interrégional de cancérologie, centre Jean-Bernard, clinique Victor-Hugo, 72000 Le Mans, France
| | - N Périchon
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Eugène-Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - C Durdux
- Département de radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhiyu Z, Qi Z, Zhen S, Jun O, Jianglei Z. The Effect of Tri-Modality Therapy with Bladder Preservation for Selective Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2021; 20:15330338211062323. [PMID: 34816789 PMCID: PMC8649089 DOI: 10.1177/15330338211062323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor combined with postoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical cystectomy (RC) in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. Clinical data of 125 patients with MIBC admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from December 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, in which 79 patients (tri-modality therapy [TMT] group) received TMT bladder-sparing treatment, and 41 patients (RC group) received RC. The differences of probabilities for 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, and comprehensive overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS) between 2 groups were calculated using Kaplan-Meier product limited estimates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect potential risk factors for OS and PFS. Results: There was no statistical difference between the TMT group and RC group in the 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, comprehensive OS rate, and PFS rate. And survival analysis found no significant difference in OS and PFS between the 2 groups. Univariate analysis showed that age, TNM staging, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were associated with OS, while PNI was connected to tumor recurrence. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that TNM staging and PNI were independent risk factors for OS. Conclusions: TMT can be used as an alternative to RC for MIBC patients under the premise of strict control of indications, rigorous postoperative follow-up, and timely salvage cystectomy. PNI was negatively correlated with OS and PFS, while TNM staging was positively correlated with OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhang Zhiyu
- 74566The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhou Qi
- 74566The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Song Zhen
- 74566The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Ouyang Jun
- 74566The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhang Jianglei
- 74566The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pak JS, Haas CR, Anderson CB, DeCastro GJ, Benson MC, McKiernan JM. Survival and oncologic outcomes of complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:787.e9-787.e15. [PMID: 33865688 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prior studies have shown that pathologic complete response at radical cystectomy, a significant prognostic factor, can be attributed to both neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and high-quality transurethral resections (TURBT) prior to NAC. It remains unclear whether the visual completeness of TURBT prior to NAC plays an important role in subsequent outcomes. We sought to assess the association of completeness of TURBT prior to NAC with response and survival outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed all patients with clinically localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer at our institution who received NAC from 2000 to 2017. Complete TURBT was defined as resection of all visible tumor in entirety, resection to normal-appearing muscle, and/or repeat pre-NAC TURBT revealing cT0. Patients who were restaged as cT0 after NAC and refused cystectomy were placed on an active surveillance/delayed intervention (ASDI) protocol. The primary endpoints were overall and cancer-specific survival. The secondary endpoints were recurrence-free and muscle-invasive recurrence-free survival. RESULTS Of 93 patients, 62 (67%) underwent complete TURBT prior to chemotherapy. Compared to patients with incomplete TURBT, those with complete TURBT had lower rates of variant histology (13% vs. 32%) and hydronephrosis (15% vs. 39%). Also, 36% of patients with incomplete TURBT had ≥cT3 disease prior to NAC, compared to none in the complete TURBT cohort. Patients with complete TURBT were more likely to defer RC and pursue ASDI (61% vs. 32%). Those with complete TURBT had lower rates of pT2 or higher disease at cystectomy (48% vs. 75%), with a lower rate of N+ disease trending towards significance (17% vs. 37%). Patients with complete TURBT had higher 5-year overall (77% vs. 46%, P = 0.003) and cancer-specific (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.001) survival. On Cox regression analysis, complete TURBT was significantly associated with superior cancer-specific, recurrence-free, and muscle-invasive recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS A complete TURBT prior to NAC is associated with improved survival and oncologic outcomes in this cohort with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The extent to which complete TURBT simply represents a proxy for less aggressive disease or is actually a beneficial therapeutic intervention which improves response to chemotherapy is difficult to define retrospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S Pak
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center,NY.
| | | | | | - G Joel DeCastro
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center,NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Agarwal PK, Sfakianos JP, Feldman A, Tagawa ST, Black PC. A 25-year perspective on advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation, treatment and future directions/challenges of urothelial cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:528-547. [PMID: 34332848 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Urologic Oncology Journal was founded 25 years ago and we reviewed the literature since that time in the area of urothelial cancer to see the progress and pitfalls we have made over this time period. A comprehensive literature search was conducted by the authors involved who are all actively involved in research, clinical trials, and treatment for urothelial cancer and the results were summarized over the past 25 years. The field of urothelial cancer has evolved tremendously in the last 25 years with the incorporation of molecular subtyping, novel imaging, immunotherapy, and robotic surgery. However, treatments such as BCG and radical cystectomy have remained steadfast over the last 25 years. Although we have a better understanding of the biology of bladder cancer, we still have a long way from being able to cure patients with bladder cancer and eliminate morbidity from treatments. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been made since the founding of the Urologic Oncology Journal 25 years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piyush K Agarwal
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, UChicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Adam Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khalifa J, Supiot S, Pignot G, Hennequin C, Blanchard P, Pasquier D, Magné N, de Crevoisier R, Graff-Cailleaud P, Riou O, Cabaillé M, Azria D, Latorzeff I, Créhange G, Chapet O, Rouprêt M, Belhomme S, Mejean A, Culine S, Sargos P. Recommendations for planning and delivery of radical radiotherapy for localized urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:95-114. [PMID: 34118357 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Curative radio-chemotherapy is recognized as a standard treatment option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Nevertheless, the technical aspects for MIBC radiotherapy are heterogeneous with a lack of practical recommendations. METHODS AND MATERIALS In 2018, a workshop identified the need for two cooperative groups to develop consistent, evidence-based guidelines for irradiation technique in the delivery of curative radiotherapy. Two radiation oncologists performed a review of the literature addressing several topics relative to radical bladder radiotherapy: planning computed tomography acquisition, target volume delineation, radiation schedules (total dose and fractionation) and dose delivery (including radiotherapy techniques, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and adaptive treatment modalities). Searches for original and review articles in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases were conducted from January 1990 until March 2020. During a meeting conducted in October 2020, results on 32 topics were presented and discussed with a working group involving 15 radiation oncologists, 3 urologists and one medical oncologist. We applied the American Urological Association guideline development's method to define a consensus strategy. RESULTS A consensus was obtained for all 34 except 4 items. The group did not obtain an agreement on CT enhancement added value for planning, PTV margins definition for empty bladder and full bladder protocols, and for pelvic lymph-nodes irradiation. High quality evidence was shown in 6 items; 8 items were considered as low quality of evidence. CONCLUSION The current recommendations propose a homogenized modality of treatment both for routine clinical practice and for future clinical trials, following the best evidence to date, analyzed with a robust methodology. The XXX group formulates practical guidelines for the implementation of innovative techniques such as adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Géraldine Pignot
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | | | - Pierre Graff-Cailleaud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, France
| | | | - David Azria
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, APHP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Belhomme
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Arnaud Mejean
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Konieczkowski DJ, Efstathiou JA, Mouw KW. Contemporary and Emerging Approaches to Bladder-Preserving Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2021; 35:567-584. [PMID: 33958151 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Bladder-preserving trimodality therapy (TMT), consisting of trans-urethral bladder tumor resection followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, is an established standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For appropriately selected patients, TMT offers oncologic outcomes comparable to radical cystectomy while preserving the patient's native bladder. Optimal TMT outcomes require careful patient selection, which is currently based on clinical and pathologic factors. The role of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in TMT is currently being investigated in several on-going clinical trials. In the future, molecular features associated with response to TMT or ICB may further improve patient selection and guide post-treatment surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University, 460 West 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 3, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, HIM 328, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Deuker M, Krimphove MJ, Stolzenbach LF, Collà Ruvolo C, Nocera L, Mansour M, Tian Z, Roos FC, Becker A, Kluth LA, Shariat SF, Black PC, Kassouf W, Tilki D, Saad F, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Radical Cystectomy vs. Multimodality Treatment in T2N0M0 Bladder Cancer: A Population-based, Age-matched Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e264-e271. [PMID: 33972185 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy still exists regarding efficacy of multimodality treatment (MMT) vs. radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB). METHODS Within the SEER database (2004-2016), we retrospectively identified patients with stage T2N0M0 UCUB. Competing risks regression (CRR) tested cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and adjusted for other-cause mortality after MMT vs. RC. Exact matching for age was applied. Subgroup analyses focused on differences in chemotherapy or lymph node dissection rates. In sensitivity analyses, we accounted for 40% understaging rate in patients who underwent MMT. RESULTS Of 9862 patients with T2N0M0 UCUB, 2675 (27.1%) underwent MMT vs. 5751 (58.3%) RC vs. 1436 (14.6%) radiotherapy (RT) without chemotherapy. MMT rate increased (annually +3.0%, P < .01) and MMT patient age was significantly higher (median 77 years) than RC patient age (68 years). In exact age-matched analyses, 10-year CSM rates were 44.3% vs. 25.9% for MMT vs. RC (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] 0.48); 44.1% vs. 22.8% for MMT vs. RC with chemotherapy (HR 0.43); 40.5% vs. 31.1% for MMT vs. RC without lymph node dissection (HR 0.66), and 55.6% vs. 27.3% for RT without chemotherapy vs. RC (HR 0.37, all P < .001). Sensitivity analyses that addressed understaging of patients who underwent MMT resulted in virtually the same CSM rates. CONCLUSION In patents with T2N0M0, MMT or even more so RT alone may be associated with higher CSM than RC, even in exact age-matched multivariate CRR analyses, which adjust for other-cause mortality. In consequence, patients with T2 UCUB should be informed of this possible CSM disadvantage outside of highly specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Deuker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Marieke J Krimphove
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - L Franziska Stolzenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mila Mansour
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Frederik C Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dinh TKT, Mitin T, Bagshaw HP, Hoffman KE, Hwang C, Jeffrey Karnes R, Kishan AU, Liauw SL, Lloyd S, Potters L, Showalter TN, Taira AV, Vapiwala N, Zaorsky NG, D'Amico AV, Nguyen PL, Davis BJ. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Radiation Treatment of Node-Negative Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:953-963. [PMID: 33127490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Definitive radiation therapy (RT), with or without concurrent chemotherapy, is an alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with localized, muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are either not surgical candidates or prefer organ preservation. We aim to synthesize an evidence-based guideline regarding the appropriate use of RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses literature review using the PubMed and Embase databases. Based on the literature review, critical management topics were identified and reformulated into consensus questions. An expert panel was assembled to address key areas of both consensus and controversy using the modified Delphi framework. RESULTS A total of 761 articles were screened, of which 61 were published between 1975 and 2019 and included for full review. There were 7 well-designed studies, 20 good quality studies, 28 quality studies with design limitations, and 6 references not suited as primary evidence. Adjuvant radiation therapy after cystectomy was not included owing to lack of high-quality data or clinical use. An expert panel consisting of 14 radiation oncologists, 1 medical oncologist, and 1 urologist was assembled. We identified 4 clinical variants of MIBC: surgically fit patients who wish to pursue organ preservation, patients surgically unfit for cystectomy, patients medically unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and borderline cystectomy candidates based on age with unilateral hydronephrosis and normal renal function. We identified key areas of controversy, including use of definitive radiation therapy for patients with negative prognostic factors, appropriate radiation therapy dose, fractionation, fields and technique when used, and chemotherapy sequencing and choice of agent. CONCLUSIONS There is limited level-one evidence to guide appropriate treatment of MIBC. Studies vary significantly with regards to patient selection, chemotherapy use, and radiation therapy technique. A consensus guideline on the appropriateness of RT for MIBC may aid practicing oncologists in bridging the gap between data and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tru-Khang T Dinh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timur Mitin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Hilary P Bagshaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Clinics, Palo Alto, California
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clara Hwang
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Louis Potters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Al V Taira
- Sutter Health Radiation Oncology, San Mateo, California
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State University Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer, Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer, Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Challapalli A, Masson S, White P, Dailami N, Pearson S, Rowe E, Koupparis A, Oxley J, Abdelaziz A, Ash-Miles J, Bravo A, Foulstone E, Perks C, Holly J, Persad R, Bahl A. A Single-arm Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Cabazitaxel and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:325-332. [PMID: 33727028 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy improves survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, response rates and survival remain suboptimal. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cisplatin plus cabazitaxel. METHODS A phase II single-arm trial was designed to recruit at least 26 evaluable patients. This would give 80% power to detect the primary endpoint, an objective response rate defined as a pathologic complete response plus partial response (pathologic downstaging), measured by pathologic staging at cystectomy (p0 = 0.35 and p1 = 0.60, α = 0.05). RESULTS Objective response was seen in 15 of 26 evaluable patients (57.7%) and more than one- third of patients achieved a pathologic complete response (9/26; 34.6%). Seventy-eight percent of the patients (21/27) completed all cycles of treatment, with only 6.7% of the reported adverse events being graded 3 or 4. There were 6 treatment-related serious adverse event reported, but no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions. In the patients who achieved an objective response, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached (median follow-up of 41.5 months). In contrast, the median progression-free survival (7.2 months) and overall survival (16.9 months) were significantly worse (P = .001, log-rank) in patients who did not achieve an objective response. CONCLUSION Cabazitaxel plus cisplatin for neoadjuvant treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be considered a well-tolerated and effective regimen before definitive therapy with higher rates (57.7%) of objective response, comparing favorably to that with of cisplatin/gemcitabine (23%-26%). These results warrant further evaluation in a phase III study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Masson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul White
- Department of Statistics, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Narges Dailami
- Department of Statistics, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Sylvia Pearson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Anthony Koupparis
- Department of Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Ahmed Abdelaziz
- Department of Oncology, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Egypt
| | | | - Alicia Bravo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Emily Foulstone
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - Claire Perks
- IGFs & Metabolic Endocrinology Group, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeff Holly
- IGFs & Metabolic Endocrinology Group, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Amit Bahl
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Swinton M, Choudhury A, Kiltie AE, Chung P, Billfalk-Kelly A, James N, Kamran SC, Efstathiou JA. Trimodal Therapy. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
25
|
Polo-Alonso E, Kuk C, Guruli G, Paul AK, Thalmann G, Kamat A, Solsona E, Thalmann G, Urdaneta AI, Zlotta AR, Mir MC. Trimodal therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer management. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2020; 72:650-662. [PMID: 33263367 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.20.04018-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical cystectomy (RC) is the current mainstay for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Concerns regarding morbidity, mortality and quality of life have favored the introduction of bladder sparing strategies. Trimodal therapy, combining transurethral resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the current standard of care for bladder preservation strategies in selected patients with MIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive search of the Medline and Embase databases was performed. A total of 19 studies were included in a systematic review of bladder sparing strategies in MIBC management was carried out following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The overall median complete response rate after trimodal therapy (TMT) was 77% (55-93). Salvage cystectomy rate with TMT was 17% on average (8-30). For TMT, the 5-year cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates range from 42-82% and 32-74%, respectively. Currently data supporting neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in bladder sparing approaches are emerging, but robust definitive conclusions are still lacking. Gastrointestinal toxicity rates are low around 4% (0.5-16), whereas genitourinary toxicity rates reached 8% (1-24). Quality of life outcomes are still underreported. CONCLUSIONS Published data and clinical experience strongly support trimodal therapy as an acceptable bladder sparing strategy in terms of oncological outcomes and quality of life in selected patients with MIBC. A strong need exists for specialized centers, to increase awareness among urologists, to discuss these options with patients and to stress the increased participation of patients and their families in treatment path decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira Polo-Alonso
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Cynthia Kuk
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Georgi Guruli
- Division of Urology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Asit K Paul
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - George Thalmann
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ashish Kamat
- Department of Urology, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Solsona
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - George Thalmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo I Urdaneta
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain -
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tholomier C, Souhami L, Kassouf W. Bladder-sparing protocols in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:2920-2937. [PMID: 33457265 PMCID: PMC7807363 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.02.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder-sparing protocols (BSP) have been gaining widespread popularity as an attractive alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Unimodal therapies are inferior to multimodal regimens. The most promising regimen is trimodal therapy (TMT), which is a combination of maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. In appropriately selected patients (low volume unifocal T2 disease, complete TURBT, no hydronephrosis and no carcinoma-in-situ), comparable oncological outcomes to RC have been reported in large retrospective studies, with a potential improvement in overall quality of life (QOL). TMT also offers the possibility for definitive therapy for patients who are not surgically fit to undergo RC. Routine biopsy of previous tumor resection is recommended to assess response. Prompt salvage RC is required in non-responders and for recurrent muscle-invasive disease, while non-muscle-invasive recurrence can be managed conservatively with TURBT +/- intravesical BCG. Long-term follow-up consisting of routine cystoscopy, urine cytology, and cross-section imaging is required. Further studies are warranted to better define the role of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of TMT. Finally, future research on predictive markers of response to TMT and on the integration of immunotherapy in bladder sparing protocols is ongoing and is highly promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Côme Tholomier
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Luis Souhami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang H, Hojo H, Parshuram Raturi V, Nakamura N, Nakamura M, Okumura M, Hirano Y, Motegi A, Kageyama SI, Zenda S, Akimoto T. Palliative Radiation Therapy for Macroscopic Hematuria Caused by Urothelial Cancer. Palliat Med Rep 2020; 1:201-207. [PMID: 34223477 PMCID: PMC8241331 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profiles of palliative radiation therapy (RT) for macroscopic hematuria (MH) caused by urothelial cancer. Methods: A total of 25 urothelial cancer patients with MH who underwent palliative RT between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed in this retrospective study. The hematuria-free survival (HFS) time was defined as the period from complete resolution of MH to the recurrence of MH, death, or the last follow-up examination. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: By the end of the median follow-up duration of 90 days (11–886 days), complete resolution of MH had been achieved in 22 patients (88%), and the median interval between the start of RT and resolution of MH was 9 days (2–179 days). Of the 22 patients in whom the symptom resolved, 9 (41%) developed recurrent MH, and the median time to relapse of MH was 129 days (30–692 days). The median RT dose was 30 Gy (20–40 Gy). Nine (36%) patients received a blood transfusion before the RT. The three-month HFS rate was 52.1%. There was a significant difference in the three-month HFS rate between patients with and without a history of pretreatment blood transfusion (HFS rate: 34.6% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.03). Grade 2 urinary tract pain and grade 3 diarrhea were seen in one patient each. Conclusion: Palliative RT appeared to be effective with limited toxicities for urothelial cancer patients with MH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiqin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Jinan Central Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.,Department of Oncology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.,Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Hojo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Vijay Parshuram Raturi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Okumura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hirano
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shun-Ichiro Kageyama
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jiang DM, North SA, Canil C, Kolinsky M, Wood LA, Gray S, Eigl BJ, Basappa NS, Blais N, Winquist E, Mukherjee SD, Booth CM, Alimohamed NS, Czaykowski P, Kulkarni GS, Black PC, Chung PW, Kassouf W, van der Kwast T, Sridhar SS. Current Management of Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Consensus Guideline from the Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada. Bladder Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.3233/blc-200291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), treatment outcomes remain suboptimal, and variability exists across current practice patterns. OBJECTIVE: To promote standardization of care for MIBC in Canada by developing a consensus guidelines using a multidisciplinary, evidence-based, patient-centered approach who specialize in bladder cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase was performed; and most recent guidelines from national and international organizations were reviewed. Recommendations were made based on best available evidence, and strength of recommendations were graded based on quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Overall, 17 recommendations were made covering a broad range of topics including pathology review, staging investigations, systemic therapy, local definitive therapy and surveillance. Of these, 10 (59% ) were level 1 or 2, 7 (41% ) were level 3 or 4 recommendations. There were 2 recommendations which did not reach full consensus, and were based on majority opinion. This guideline also provides guidance for the management of cisplatin-ineligible patients, variant histologies, and bladder-sparing trimodality therapy. Potential biomarkers, ongoing clinical trials, and future directions are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline embodies the collaborative expertise from all disciplines involved, and provides guidance to further optimize and standardize the management of MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Maria Jiang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott A. North
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Christina Canil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Kolinsky
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lori A. Wood
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Samantha Gray
- Department of Oncology, Saint John Regional Hospital, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, NB, Canada
| | - Bernhard J. Eigl
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Naveen S. Basappa
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Normand Blais
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Som D. Mukherjee
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nimira S. Alimohamed
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Piotr Czaykowski
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Girish S. Kulkarni
- Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter W. Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Srikala S. Sridhar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Compérat E, Audenet F, Houédé N, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Colin P, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Roumiguié M, Méjean A. French ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Bladder cancer. Prog Urol 2020; 28:R48-R80. [PMID: 32093463 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective To propose updated French guidelines for non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancers. Methods A Medline search was achieved between 2015 and 2018, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of bladder cancer, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. Results Diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is based on a complete deep resection of the tumor. The use of fluorescence and a second-look indication are essential to improve initial diagnosis. Risks of both recurrence and progression can be estimated using the EORTC score. A stratification of patients into low, intermediate and high risk groups is pivotal for recommending adjuvant treatment: instillation of chemotherapy (immediate post-operative, standard schedule) or intravesical BCG (standard schedule and maintenance). Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-refractory patients. Extension evaluation of MIBC is based on contrast-enhanced pelvic-abdominal and thoracic CT-scan. Multiparametric MRI can be an alternative. Cystectomy associated with extended lymph nodes dissection is considered the gold standard for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients. An orthotopic bladder substitution should be proposed to both male and female patients with no contraindication and in cases of negative frozen urethral samples; otherwise transileal ureterostomy is recommended as urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line chemotherapy using platin is recommended (GC or MVAC), when performans status (PS < 1) and renal function (creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min) allow it (only in 50 % of cases). In second line treatment, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival. Conclusion These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for NMIBC and MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne université, AP–HP, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’anatomie pathologique, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP–HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Département d’oncologie médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, 51100 France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, AP–HP, 75010 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59800 Lille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie de l’hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, université Paris-Descartes, AP–HP, 75018 Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Département d’urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, 31000 France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP–HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tachibana I, Bandali E, Calaway AC, Krishnan N, Cheng L, Adra N, Kaimakliotis HZ. Urothelial carcinoma in situ response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or lack thereof: Impact on patient selection for organ preservation in muscle-invasive disease? Urol Oncol 2020; 38:850.e1-850.e7. [PMID: 32693973 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical cystectomy improves urothelial bladder cancer survival [1]. Complete pathological response on cystectomy pathology (pT0N0) is associated with the best survival outcomes [2]. Rates of complete response have increased with improved adoption of NACT calling into question the need for radical cystectomy or perhaps use of organ preservation protocols. In patients with papillary bladder tumors, carcinoma in situ (CIS) has been shown to influence progression and develop into invasive urothelial carcinoma [3]. Furthermore, in patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma, concurrent CIS has been reported in roughly 45% to 65% of cases [4]. Thus, we sought to determine the response rate of CIS to NACT to determine if the presence of CIS should factor into excluding patients from organ preservation. METHODS A review of our prospectively maintained bladder cancer database was performed among patients undergoing preoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by cystectomy between 2007 and 2017. Presence of CIS before and after radical cystectomy was assessed. Random bladder biopsies or transurethral resection (TUR) with enhanced imaging for CIS (Cysview) were not routinely utilized in the preoperative setting. RESULTS One-hundred eighty-three patients were identified that underwent preoperative cisplatin chemotherapy. A total of 96 (52.4%) unique patients had documented CIS in the entire cohort. Forty-eight (50%) patients were noted to have CIS on TUR. Of these 48 patients, 26 (54.1%) were noted to have residual CIS on final pathology. An additional 48 patients were found to have CIS on final pathology that was not diagnosed on TUR, making a total of 74 (77.1%) patients with CIS refractory to NACT on cystectomy pathology. CONCLUSIONS CIS seems to respond poorly to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If organ preservation protocols are considered, a thorough assessment for CIS with enhanced photodynamic detection cystoscopy or random bladder biopsies should be considered. Residual cisplatin-refractory disease, even if noninvasive CIS, may lead to poor outcomes. Future molecular classifiers may assist in disease signatures to help guide treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isamu Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
| | - Elhaam Bandali
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Adam C Calaway
- Departent of Urology, University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Naveen Krishnan
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nabil Adra
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morales ASR, Joy JK, Zbona DM. Administration sequence for multi-agent oncolytic regimens. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26:933-942. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155219895070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The existence of a multitude of oncolytics regimens containing two or more agents (combination) outlines the need to define their most adequate sequence of administration. However, limited resources are currently available to specify a particular sequence, presenting challenges potentially impacting on patient safety, and Pharmacy & Infusion Nursing workflows. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed leading to the compilation of a document containing drug administration sequencing instructions for our Nursing, Pharmacy, and Oncology providers to follow. Regimens prioritized in our literature review represented regimens selected as part of our approved Clinical Pathways, regimens inquiries from Pharmacy or Nursing, as well as less frequently used regimens. We stratified the regimens by tumor type and arranged them alphabetically by indication. Results A table was compiled containing all the supporting literature for the recommended drug administration sequences. If, in certain instances, no literature support was identified outlining rationale such as enhanced management of adverse effects, a specific institutional decision was made by our enterprise Medical Oncology Committee with recommendations from Pharmacy experts. The primary guiding principles for outlining our recommendations were the following: administration of vesicant agents first; administration of biologic agents first; administration of taxanes prior to platinum agents; and duration of infusion (shorter infusions prioritized). Conclusion This guideline is not exhaustive. The compilation provided here is intended to be utilized as guidance for oncolytics administration sequence. We will continue to review and incorporate treatment sequencing recommendations for additional regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jamie K Joy
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America Global, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jiang DM, Chung P, Kulkarni GS, Sridhar SS. Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recent Advances and Unanswered Questions. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:14. [PMID: 32008105 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0880-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Bladder-sparing trimodality therapy (TMT) has become an accepted alternative to cystectomy for selected muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients unfit for cystectomy or opting for bladder preservation. This review will summarize recent advances in TMT for MIBC. RECENT FINDINGS A growing body of literature has emerged which supports the use of TMT. However, its delivery is yet to be standardized. The role of chemotherapy and predictive biomarkers remain to be elucidated. Novel bladder-sparing approaches, drug combinations including immunotherapy and targeted therapies are under investigation in clinical trials, with the goal of ultimately enhancing survival and quality of life outcomes. Recent advances in TMT have made bladder preservation possible for MIBC patients seeking an alternative local therapy to cystectomy. With careful patient selection, TMT offers comparable survival outcomes to cystectomy, and improved quality of life as patients are able to successfully retain their bladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Maria Jiang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada, 700 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada, 6-824, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder Preservation. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:36-41. [PMID: 29912804 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical cystectomy currently remains the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, surgery can be associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, including the removal of the bladder. An alternative strategy is to preserve the bladder through concurrent chemoradiation following a maximal transurethral resection of the tumor. National protocols using a bladder-preservation approach have demonstrated disease-specific outcomes comparable to radical cystectomy in selected patients, but these results have not been replicated in previously reported population-based series. Here, we describe an outcomes analysis of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with either radical surgery or bladder-preserving chemoradiation (BPCRT) for those patients meeting BPCRT criterion using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the NCDB, patients with American Joint Commission on Cancer clinical T2-3, N0, M0 urothelial carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were included for analysis. Only patients treated with definitive intent with either radical cystectomy or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation after a maximal transurethral tumor resection were included. Propensity-score matching was used. RESULTS Among 8454 eligible patients, 7276 (86%) underwent radical cystectomy, and 1178 (14%) underwent BPCRT. Patients undergoing BPCRT were significantly older (median age, 77 vs. 68 y; P<0.001) and had higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores (P=0.002). Using propensity-matched analysis, 1002 patients remained in each cohort, and there was no significant difference in survival found between the 2 cohorts (median overall survival, 2.7 vs. 3.0 y [P=0.20]; 4-year overall survival, 39.1% and 42.6% [P=0.15], for BPCRT and surgery, respectively). In addition, the hazard ratio (HR) of surgery versus BPCRT decreased over time, with an initial HR of 1.27 favoring BPCRT which decreased by a factor of 0.85 per year. CONCLUSIONS From 2004 to 2013, ∼14% of patients from the NCDB who potentially met bladder-preservation criteria underwent the procedure. Our propensity-matched analysis is the only report of its kind to demonstrate similar survival outcomes with bladder preservation when patients are properly selected. This study is also the first to demonstrate a dynamic HR between radical surgery and BPCRT over time.
Collapse
|
34
|
Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 3-organ-sparing procedures in urothelial cancer of upper tract, bladder and urethra. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:1903-1911. [PMID: 31352580 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02232-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The impact of radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma is significant on patient's quality of life. Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) can provide comparable oncological outcomes and with improved quality of life. In this review, we summarize the indications, techniques and outcomes of OSS for these tumors. METHODS PubMed® was searched for relevant articles. Keywords used were: for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): endoscopic, ureteroscopic/percutaneous management, laser ablation; for urothelial bladder cancer: bladder preservation, trimodal therapy, muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); for urethral cancer: urethra/penile-sparing, urethral carcinoma. RESULTS Kidney-sparing surgery is an option in patients with low-risk UTUC with better renal function preservation and comparable oncological control to radical nephroureterectomy. In select patients with MIBC, trimodal therapy has better quality of life and comparable oncological control to radical cystectomy. In distal male urethral cancer, penile conserving surgery is feasible and offers acceptable survival outcomes. In female urethral cancer, organ preservation can be achieved, in addition to OSS, through radiation. CONCLUSIONS In the appropriately selected patient, OSS in upper tract, bladder and urethral carcinoma has comparable oncological outcomes to radical surgery and with the additional benefit of improved quality of life.
Collapse
|
35
|
Song YP, McWilliam A, Hoskin PJ, Choudhury A. Organ preservation in bladder cancer: an opportunity for truly personalized treatment. Nat Rev Urol 2019; 16:511-522. [PMID: 31197260 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0199-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radical treatment of many solid tumours has moved from surgery to multimodal organ preservation strategies combining systemic and local treatments. Trimodality bladder-preserving treatment (TMT) comprises maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumour followed by radiotherapy and concurrent radiosensitizing treatment, thereby sparing the urinary bladder. From the patient's perspective, the choice of maintaining quality of life without a negative effect on the chances of cure and long-term survival is attractive. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the evidence shows comparable clinical outcomes between patients undergoing radical cystectomy and TMT. Despite this evidence, many patients continue to be offered radical surgery as the standard-of-care treatment. Improvements in radiotherapy techniques with adaptive radiotherapy and advances in imaging translate to increases in the accuracy of treatment delivery and reductions in long-term toxicities. With the advent of novel biomarkers promising improved prediction of treatment response, stratification of patients for different treatments on the basis of tumour biology could soon be a reality. The future of oncological treatment lies in personalized medicine with the combination of technological and biological advances leading to truly bespoke management for patients with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yee Pei Song
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK. .,Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter J Hoskin
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examines both trimodality therapy (TMT) in the definitive management of bladder cancer as well as the use of adjuvant radiotherapy for bladder cancer with a specific focus on publications from the last 2 years. RECENT FINDINGS TMT is an effective management strategy for muscle invasive bladder cancer with outcomes similar to radical cystectomy. Effectiveness of this strategy exists in variant histologies and can be personalized with use of biomarkers. There is a role for adjuvant radiotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer, especially in the age of improved imaging and modern radiotherapy techniques. SUMMARY This review should provide the reader data necessary to support use of TMT and adjuvant radiation therapy in their clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Pham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Murali-Krishnan S, Pang KH, Greco F, Fiori C, Catto JW, Vavassori VL, Esperto F. Bladder-sparing treatment in MIBC: where do we stand? MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:101-112. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
38
|
Genitourinary System Cancers. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97145-2_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
39
|
García-Perdomo HA, Montes-Cardona CE, Guacheta M, Castillo DF, Reis LO. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer organ-preserving therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2018; 36:1997-2008. [PMID: 29943218 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2384-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effectiveness and harms of bladder-preserving trimodal therapy (TMT) as a first-line treatment versus radical cystectomy (RC) plus radical pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in terms of overall survival. METHODS We included parallel clinical trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies that included patients older than 18 years old, diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, who underwent TMT compared with RC. The planned comparison was TMT versus RC plus pelvic lymphadenectomy as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were salvage cystectomy and cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival. A search strategy was designed for MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, and LILACS. We saturated information with conference abstracts, in progress clinical trials, literature published in non-indexed journals, and other sources of gray literature. Standardized tools assessed the risk of bias independently. We performed the statistical analysis in R v3.4.1 and effect sizes were reported in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Accordingly, we used a random effect model due to the statistical heterogeneity found in included studies. RESULTS We found 2682 records with the search strategies and, finally, 11 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The summary HR for OS was 1.06 95%CI (0.85-1.31) I2 = 77%, showing no statistical difference. Regarding cancer-specific survival, the summary HR was 1.23 95%CI (1.04-1.46) I2 = 14%. On the other side, for the progression-free survival, the summary HR was 1.11 95%CI (0.63-1.95) I2 = 78%. Only one study described HR for adverse events (1.37 95%CI 1.16-1.59). CONCLUSION We found no differences in overall survival and progression-free survival between these two interventions. Nonetheless, we found that cancer-specific survival favored patients who received radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
- School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
- UROGIV Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Diego Fernando Castillo
- School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
- UROGIV Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Leonardo O Reis
- UroScience, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas and University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
El-Achkar A, Souhami L, Kassouf W. Bladder Preservation Therapy: Review of Literature and Future Directions of Trimodal Therapy. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 19:108. [PMID: 30392150 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-018-0859-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW This review targets the latest literature on bladder preservation therapy with emphasis on trimodal therapy (TMT), highlighting its role in the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and outlining future directions in bladder preservation research. RECENT FINDINGS TMT is the most promising bladder preservation treatment modality. Comparable results to contemporary radical cystectomy series are seen in properly selected patients. A multidisciplinary team approach is critical in the management of these patients. Future research is directed at the integration of immunotherapy into the treatment protocol. TMT, involving maximal transurethral resection followed by chemoradiation, is an attractive alternative to radical cystectomy with urinary diversion in carefully selected patients with muscle invasive disease. In the absence of randomized trial (RCT), comparison between TMT and cystectomy, based on retrospective data from large centers, suggests comparable oncological outcomes, with a favorable impact on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan El-Achkar
- Experimental surgery, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Luis Souhami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, 1001 Decarie Blvd, D02.7210, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Compérat E, Audenet F, Houédé N, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Colin P, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Roumiguié M, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs de la vessie French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Bladder cancer. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S46-S78. [PMID: 30366708 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.07.283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, GRC no5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne université, GRC no5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, 51100 France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59800 Lille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, université Paris-Descartes, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, 31000 France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mathes J, Rausch S, Todenhöfer T, Stenzl A. Trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:1219-1229. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1535314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Mathes
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Büchser D, Zapatero A, Rogado J, Talaya M, Martín de Vidales C, Arellano R, Bocardo G, Cruz Conde A, Pérez L, Murillo MT. Long-term Outcomes and Patterns of Failure Following Trimodality Treatment With Bladder Preservation for Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology 2018; 124:183-190. [PMID: 30266376 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report long-term results on survival, toxicity, and patterns of failure of 3 different organ-sparing strategies for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a monoinstitutional prospective analysis of 3 consecutive bladder-sparing protocols combining maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (mTURBT), radiotherapy (RT), and cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Protocol 1 consisted of neoadjuvant methotrexate-cisplatin-vinblastine followed by endoscopic re-evaluation and consolidative RT 60 Gy in complete responders. Protocol 2 involved altered-fractionation RT 64.8 Gy and concurrent weekly cisplatin with re-evaluation after 40.8 Gy. Protocol 3 consisted of RT 64.8 Gy with concomitant weekly cisplatin. Nonresponders underwent radical cystectomy. Probabilities for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier product limited estimates. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to detect potential risk factors for OS, CSS, and MFS. RESULTS The 10-year bladder preservation rate was 79%. The 10-year OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 43.2%, 76.3% and 79.2%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the different treatment protocols. On multivariate analysis, mTURBT of the bladder and the complete response after induction therapy were independent correlates of improved OS and of MFS. The development of invasive bladder recurrence was independently associated with worse CSS and MFS. CONCLUSION Ten-year results indicate that bladder-sparing treatment is a successful approach for muscle invasive bladder cancer in selected patients. The mTURBT of the bladder tumor and complete response after induction therapy remain the most relevant predictive factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Büchser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacobo Rogado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marisol Talaya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ramón Arellano
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Bocardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Cruz Conde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leopoldo Pérez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María T Murillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wilhite TJ, Routman D, Arnett AL, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Pisansky TM, Boorjian SA, Jethwa KR, Mynderse LA, Roberts KW, Frank I, Choo R, Davis BJ, Stish BJ. Increased utilization of external beam radiotherapy relative to cystectomy for localized, muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a SEER analysis. Bladder (San Franc) 2018; 5:e34. [PMID: 32775476 PMCID: PMC7401988 DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2018.639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess recent utilization patterns of radiotherapy (RT) relative to cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and evaluate survival trends over time in patients receiving RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program (SEER) was used to identify patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2013 with localized MIBC. Patients with a prior history of non-bladder malignancy, who received no treatment, or did not have available treatment information, were excluded. Treatment utilization patterns were assessed using Cochran-Armitage tests for trend, and patient characteristics were compared using chi-square tests. Overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All-cause (ACM) and cause-specific mortality (CSM) were evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Of 16175 patients analyzed, 11917 (74%) underwent cystectomy, and 4258 (26%) were treated with RT. Patients who received RT were older (median age 79 vs. 68, P < 0.01). Over time, the proportion of patients receiving RT relative to cystectomy increased (24% 1992–2002 vs. 28% 2003–2013, P < 0.01), despite median patient age throughout the study period remaining unchanged (71 for each 1992–2002 and 2003–2013, P = 0.41). For RT, compared with patients diagnosed earlier, those diagnosed from 2010–2013 showed improved OS (64% vs. 60% at 1 year, P < 0.01; 38% vs. 29% at 3 years, P < 0.01) and CSS (71% vs. 67% at 1 year, P = 0.01; 51% vs. 40% at 3 years, P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, diagnosis from 2010–2013 was associated with a lower estimated risk of ACM (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.66–0.89, P < 0.001) and CSM (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.97, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Utilization of RT for localized MIBC increased relative to cystectomy from 1992 to 2013, despite the median age of treated patients remaining unchanged. More recent survival outcomes for patients receiving RT were improved, supporting continued use of bladder preservation strategies utilizing RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J Wilhite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrea L Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy E Glasgow
- Robert and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Elizabeth B Habermann
- Robert and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Igor Frank
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bradley J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Here, we will review and summarize the current status and emerging data supporting the use of trimodality therapy as an alternative to cystectomy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. RECENT FINDINGS There are no randomized-controlled data comparing radical cystectomy with bladder preserving trimodality therapy available for comparison. However, observational data suggests acceptable bladder preservation and functional outcomes in patients receiving bladder preserving trimodality therapy as well as similar oncologic outcomes in select patients compared to radical cystectomy. Future trials are focusing on new techniques and novel therapeutics in patients with bladder cancer. Bladder preserving trimodality therapy results in satisfactory quality of life and comparable disease outcomes for select patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder compared to cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Skyler B Johnson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, HRT 138, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, HRT 138, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. .,Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
8 - Pianificazione E Somministrazione Del Trattamento Radioterapico. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 104:S31-S35. [PMID: 29893177 DOI: 10.1177/0300891618766111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
47
|
Tselis N, Prott FJ, Ott O, Weiss C, Rödel C. [Radiochemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer : An update]. Urologe A 2018; 57:679-685. [PMID: 29651707 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0628-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Primary organ-preservation by means of multimodal therapy, however, can be a viable alternative to radical surgery. OBJECTIVES The concept and results of multimodal therapy, consisting of initial transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-B), followed by simultaneous radiochemotherapy (RCT), are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS Evaluation of retrospective cohorts and prospective therapy optimization studies on organ-preservation treatment regimens. Comparative meta-analyses comparing cystectomy with multimodal treatment are presented. RESULTS Complete TUR-B, including bladder mapping and tumor biopsy, should precede simultaneous RCT. Radiosensitization should be cisplatin-based or consist of a combination of 5‑fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Complete response rates after TUR-B plus RCT are generated in 60-90% of patients along with 5‑year survival rates of 40-75% and preservation of the bladder in approximately 80% of surviving patients. CONCLUSIONS Multimodal therapy by means of TUR-B followed by simultaneous RCT is a viable alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with muscle-invasive urinary bladder carcinoma. Patients with early tumors (cT2/3N0) are particularly suitable in whom initial TUR-B leads to complete tumor resection (R0).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Tselis
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland.
| | | | - O Ott
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - C Weiss
- Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Deutschland
| | - C Rödel
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bladder-Sparing Treatments. Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00027-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
49
|
Ha YS, Kim TH. The Surveillance for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
50
|
Rödel C, Tselis N. Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_39-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|