A Prospective Randomized Trial of the Effects of Early Enteral Feeding After Radical Cystectomy

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Surgeons' perspectives and recommendations ten years after its implementation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes. Embase and Medline (through Pubmed) were searched systematically. Relevant articles were selected and graded. For each ERAS item, a level of evidence was determined. An e-Delphi consensus was then performed amongst an international panel with renowned experience in RC to provide recommendations based on expert opinion.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Preoperative medical optimization and avoiding bowel preparation are highly recommended. Robotic-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion is moderately recommended and can help in applying other ERAS items, such as early mobilization. Medical thromboprophylaxis should be administered and nasogastric tube should be removed at the end of surgery. Perioperative fluid restriction as well as opioid-sparing anesthesia protocols should be implemented. Generally, consensus was reached on most ERAS items, with the exception of epidural anesthesia (no consensus), resection site drainage (consensus against), and type of urinary drainage. Limitations include the lack of a multidisciplinary approach to the present consensus, giving however a highly specialized surgical opinion on ERAS.

CONCLUSIONS

and clinical implications: The current study updates ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and suggests application of ERAS by a panel of experts in the field.

Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Meta-regression Analysis

CONTEXT

Radical cystectomy is considered a procedure of high complexity with a relative high complication rate.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically summarize the literature regarding the complications of radical cystectomy and the factors that contribute to them.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on complications related to radical cystectomy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 3766 studies were screened, and 44 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Complications following radical cystectomy are quite common. The most common complications were gastrointestinal complications (20%), infectious complications (17%), and ileus (14%). The majority of complications occurring were Clavien I-II (45%). Specific measurable patient factors are related to certain complications and can be used to stratify risk and assist in preoperative counseling, while proper design of high-quality RCTs may better reflect real-life complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, RCTs with a low risk of bias had higher complication rates than studies with a high risk of bias, underlining the need for further improvement on complication reporting in order to refine surgical outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Radical cystectomy is usually followed by high complication rates, which affect patients and are, in turn, strongly associated with patients' preoperative health status.

Nutrition as prevention for improved cancer health outcomes: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Among adults with cancer, malnutrition is associated with decreased treatment completion, more treatment harms and use of health care, and worse short-term survival. To inform the National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention workshop, "Nutrition as Prevention for Improved Cancer Health Outcomes," this systematic review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of providing nutrition interventions before or during cancer therapy to improve outcomes of cancer treatment.

METHODS

We identified randomized controlled trials enrolling at least 50 participants published from 2000 through July 2022. We provide a detailed evidence map for included studies and grouped studies by broad intervention and cancer types. We conducted risk of bias (RoB) and qualitative descriptions of outcomes for intervention and cancer types with a larger volume of literature.

RESULTS

From 9798 unique references, 206 randomized controlled trials from 219 publications met the inclusion criteria. Studies primarily focused on nonvitamin or mineral dietary supplements, nutrition support, and route or timing of inpatient nutrition interventions for gastrointestinal or head and neck cancers. Most studies evaluated changes in body weight or composition, adverse events from cancer treatment, length of hospital stay, or quality of life. Few studies were conducted within the United States. Among intervention and cancer types with a high volume of literature (n = 114), 49% (n = 56) were assessed as high RoB. Higher-quality studies (low or medium RoB) reported mixed results on the effect of nutrition interventions across cancer and treatment-related outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Methodological limitations of nutrition intervention studies surrounding cancer treatment impair translation of findings into clinical practice or guidelines.

Efficacy of pre and rehabilitation in radical cystectomy on health related quality of life and physical function: A systematic review

Objective

The efficacy of prehabilitation or rehabilitation interventions on radical cystectomy (RC) patient reported outcomes (PROs), and patient centered outcome has not yet been thoroughly explored in prior reviews, therefore the aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of a single or multi-modal prehabilitation or/and postoperative rehabilitation interventions compared to standard treatment on postoperative complications after RC.

Methods

We performed a three-step search strategy in PubMed, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We used Covidence for the screening of articles, risk of bias assessment, and data-extraction. GRADE was used to assess the risk of bias in outcomes across studies. Where meta-analysis was possible, we used the random effect method due to substantial heterogeneity. The remaining outcomes were summarized narratively.

Results

We identified fourteen studies addressing one of the outcomes. None of the studies provided evidence to support that prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation interventions can improve global health related quality of life (HRQoL) in RC surgery or can reduce postoperative complications significantly. However, preoperative and postoperative education in stoma care can significantly improve self-efficacy and we found significant added benefits of sexual counseling to intracavernous injections compared to injection therapy alone. Likewise, an intensive smoking and alcohol cessation intervention demonstrated a significant effect on quit rates. Physical exercise is feasible and improves physical functioning although it does not reduce the postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Currently, no evidence of efficacy of prehabilitation and/or rehabilitation interventions to improve the overall HRQoL or postoperative complications after RC exists. We found evidence that education in stoma care improved self-efficacy significantly. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to generate high-quality evidence in this field.

Optimizing Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Nutrition is a modifiable risk factor for patients undergoing multimodal oncologic interventions and plays a major supportive role in the setting of bladder cancer. For patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), malnutrition is associated with increased postoperative complications and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this scoping review is to characterize the role of nutritional interventions for patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.

METHODS

A multi-database systematic scoping review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was performed. Search terms were developed a priori to identify clinical trials that focused on nutritional interventions for patients with bladder cancer undergoing RC. Eligible articles were original research articles or abstracts from clinical trials evaluating nutritional interventions in adult patients undergoing RC. Articles were excluded if they did not focus on a nutritional intervention, if patients did not carry a diagnosis of bladder cancer, or if RC was not performed. Articles were reviewed independently by the authors, and inclusion/exclusion were based on consensus agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 83 articles were identified, of which 17 were included in the final analysis. A total of 49 articles were excluded during abstract screening. An additional 17 articles were excluded based on the review of full-text articles. Results of the scoping review suggest that data on the use of nutritional screening, assessment, and intervention for patients undergoing RC are scarce. Although parenteral nutrition (PN) appears to be associated with greater complications after RC, early introduction of food postoperatively or feeding enterally offers benefit and immunonutrition supplements with a focus on a high protein diet has the potential to better optimize surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the prevalence and consequences of malnutrition among patients undergoing RC are well-established, there are limited data evaluating the use of nutritional screening, assessment, and interventions for this population. The pursuit of future clinical trials in this space is critical.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize patient recovery after major surgery. Our study was to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve patient outcomes after radical cystectomy.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane from January 2005 to January 2021 without language restrictions.

Eligibility Criteria

Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies implementing ERAS measuring its interventions on rates of postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS) and bowel function after radical cystectomy.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two members of the investigating team independently selected studies and evaluated bias using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Meta-analysis of all comparative studies used inversed-weighted, fixed- effects models and random effects models to pool results. Publication bias was graphically assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger’s test of funnel plot symmetry.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in our meta-analysis; we observed that ERAS decreased the time for the first bowel movement (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –1.30, 95% CI −1.90 to −0.70, P<0.00001) and shortened the length of stay (LOS) ([SMD]: –0.49, 95% CI −0.77 to −0.20, (P < 0.00001)); however, 30-day readmission (risk ratio [RR]: 0.97,95% [CI] 0.73 to 1.28, P=0.52) and the overall postoperative complication rate (risk ratio [RR]: 0.98,95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.09, P= 0.41) showed no significant difference.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vs. Conventional Recovery After Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy

Background and objective: Radical cystectomy has been characterized as the most difficult operation in urology because of the complex surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), which reduces the incidence of perioperative complications, has been widely used in clinical surgery. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS vs. conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS) on perioperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, based on the PICOS strategy. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were further surveyed for relevant publications. Results: Our search yielded seven RCTs containing 813 patients. The ERAS group was found to have better performance in the following parameters: length of hospital stay [mean difference (MD) = -1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.80 to -0.45, P = 0.001], time to first flatus (MD = -0.70, 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.41, P < 0.00001), and time to regular diet (MD = -0.12, 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.28, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.34, P = 0.64], readmission (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65 to 2.01, P = 0.63), ileus (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.28, P = 0.29), wound infection (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.01, P = 0.05), mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.99, P = 0.49), or time to first bowel movement (MD = -0.55, 95% CI: -1.62 to 0.53, P = 0.32). Conclusion: ERAS reduced the length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and time to regular diet after cystectomy. Compared to CRAS protocols, ERAS protocols do not increase the risk of adverse events.

Clinical efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery for patients treated with radical cystectomy and ileal urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and ileal urinary diversion (IUD). We performed a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and three main Chinese databases (WANFANG, CNKI and VIP) in December 2019 without language restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies, evaluated methodological quality and extracted data using Cochrane Collaboration’s tools. Efficacy was assessed by the time to first flatus, first bowel movement, and hospitalization time. Safety was assessed by 30-day readmission and complications after surgery. Our searches identified 6 studies, including 628 patients. A total of 323 (51%) patients took ERAS. We observed that ERAS reduced the time to first flatus [standard mean difference (SMD): −1.65, 95% CI: −2.63 to −0.68, P=0.0009], first bowel movement (SMD: −1.14, 95% CI: −1.78 to −0.50, P=0.0005), and hospitalization time (MD: −4.09, 95% CI: −6.34 to −1.85, P=0.0004). We did not detect significant difference in terms of 30-day readmission [relative risk (RR): 1.33, 95% CI: 0.61–2.88, P=0.48] and postoperative complications (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.65–1.26, P=0.56) between ERAS and conventional recovery after surgery (CRAS). Our findings indicated that ERAS protocols throughout the perioperative period of RC with IUD might reduce hospitalization expenses and contribute to higher turnover ward, more efficient utilization of medical resources and lower risk of nosocomial infection as a result of shorter length of stay. Besides, early rehabilitation of gastrointestinal function might not only facilitate wound healing and early mobilization, thereby reducing the incidence of basic complications such as cardiopulmonary disease, but also improve patients’ psychological trauma and stress response, increase self-confidence and motivation in treatments, and then lead to unexpected benefits. Further large volume, multicenter randomized controlled studies are warranted before making the final clinical guidelines.

Randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes with and without the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

Introduction:

Very few randomized controlled trials are available globally to support routine use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol after radical cystectomy (RC), and none so far has been conducted in the Indian subcontinent. The aim of the present study was to evaluate hospital stay and 30-day perioperative outcomes following RC with the implementation of the ERAS protocol.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty-four patients undergoing open RC were randomized to ERAS versus conventional surgical care (CSC) at our center from April 2017 to May 2018. Key interventions included avoidance of mechanical bowel preparation, early nasogastric tube removal, early enteral feeding, and early obligatory ambulation. Follow-up was done till 30-day postoperatively or till discharge, whichever longer.

Results:

Twenty-seven patients in each group were analyzed. The demographic profile of the groups was similar. Length of stay in each group (8 days [5–57] ERAS vs. 9 days [5–31] CSC group, P = 0.390) was similar, with time to recovery of bowel function being significantly less in ERAS group (12 h [12–108] vs. 36 h [12–60] for bowel sounds [P = 0.001], 48 h [12–108] vs. 72 h [36–156] for passage of flatus [P = 0.001], and 84 h [36–180] vs. 96 [60–156] for passage of stools [P = 0.013]). Perioperative complication rate (12 patients (44.4%) vs. 14 (51.9%), P = 0.786) was similar.

Conclusions:

ERAS protocol leads to faster bowel recovery compared to conventional care in patients undergoing open RC but fails to demonstrate a shorter length of stay and lower complication rate.

Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy

BACKGROUND

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the primary surgical treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. This major operation is typically associated with an extended hospital stay, a prolonged recovery period and potentially major complications. Nutritional interventions are beneficial in some people with other types of cancer and may be of value in this setting too.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of perioperative nutrition in people undergoing radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings published up to 22 February 2019, with no restrictions on the language or status of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults undergoing RC for bladder cancer. The intervention was any perioperative nutrition support.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and the quality of evidence using GRADE. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications at 90 days and length of hospital stay. The secondary outcome was mortality up to 90 days after surgery. When 90-day outcome data were not available, we reported 30-day data.

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified eight trials including 500 participants. Six trials were conducted in the USA and two in Europe.1. Parenteral nutrition (PN) versus oral nutrition: based on one study with 157 participants, PN may increase postoperative complications within 30 days (risk ratio (RR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.82; low-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of evidence for serious study limitations (unclear risk of selection, performance and selective reporting bias) and serious imprecision. This corresponds to 198 more complications per 1000 participants (95% CI 35 more to 405 more). Length of hospital stay may be similar (mean difference (MD) 0.5 days higher, CI not reported; low-quality evidence).2. Immuno-enhancing nutrition versus standard nutrition: based on one study including 29 participants, immuno-enhancing nutrition may reduce 90-day postoperative complications (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.23; low-quality evidence). These findings correspond to 322 fewer complications per 1000 participants (95% CI 429 fewer to 107 more). Length of hospital stay may be similar (MD 0.20 days, 95% CI 1.69 lower to 2.09 higher; low-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of evidence of both outcomes for very serious imprecision.3. Preoperative oral nutritional support versus normal diet: based on one study including 28 participants, we are very uncertain if preoperative oral supplements reduces postoperative complications. We downgraded quality for serious study limitations (unclear risk of selection, performance, attrition and selective reporting bias) and very serious imprecision. The study did not report on length of hospital stay.4. Early postoperative feeding versus standard postoperative management: based on one study with 102 participants, early postoperative feeding may increase postoperative complications (very low-quality evidence) but we are very uncertain of this finding. We downgraded the quality of evidence for serious study limitations (unclear risk of selection and performance bias) and very serious imprecision. Length of hospital stay may be similar (MD 0.95 days less, CI not reported; low-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of evidence for serious study limitations (unclear risk of selection and performance bias) and serious imprecision.5. Amino acid with dextrose versus dextrose: based on two studies with 104 participants, we are very uncertain whether amino acids reduce postoperative complications (very low-quality evidence). We are also very uncertain whether length of hospital stay is similar (very low-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of evidence for both outcomes for serious study limitations (unclear and high risk of selection bias; unclear risk of performance, detection and selective reporting bias), serious indirectness related to the patient population and very serious imprecision.6. Branch chain amino acids versus dextrose only: based on one study including 19 participants, we are very uncertain whether complication rates are similar (very low-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of evidence for serious study limitations (unclear risk of selection, performance, detection, attrition and selective reporting bias), serious indirectness related to the patient population and very serious imprecision. The study did not report on length of hospital stay.7. Perioperative oral nutritional supplements versus oral multivitamin and mineral supplement: based on one study with 61 participants, oral supplements compared to a multivitamin and mineral supplement may slightly decrease postoperative complications (low-quality evidence). These findings correspond to 135 fewer occurrences per 1000 participants (95% CI 256 fewer to 65 more). Length of hospital stay may be similar (low-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of evidence of both outcomes for study limitations and imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on few, small and dated studies, with serious methodological limitations, we found limited evidence for a benefit of perioperative nutrition interventions. We rated the quality of evidence as low or very low, which underscores the urgent need for high-quality research studies to better inform nutritional support interventions for people undergoing surgery for bladder cancer.

Does Postoperative Rehabilitation for Radical Cystectomy Call for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this review was to systematically compare the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with standard care (SC) after radical cystectomy. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until September 2017 which involved a comparison of ERAS and SC. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of ERAS versus SC. Sixteen studies including 8 prospective and 8 retrospective trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2100 participants were assigned to ERAS (1258 cases) or SC (842 cases). The time to first flatus passage {WMD=-0.95 days, 95% CI (-1.50,-0.41), P=0.0006}, time until return to a regular diet {WMD=-2.15 days, 95% CI (-2.86,-1.45), P<0.00001} and the length of hospital stay {WMD=-3.75 days, 95% CI (-5.13,-2.36), P<0.00001} were significantly shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications {OR=0.60, 95% CI (0.44, 0.83), P=0.002}, especially postoperative paralytic ileus {OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.30, 0.62), P<0.00001} and cardiovascular complications {OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09, 0.90), P=0.03} was significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the SC group. This meta-analysis demonstrated that ERAS was associated with a shorter time to first flatus passage, return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay than SC in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications, especially paralytic ileus and cardiovascular complications.

Optimizing Nutrition Prior to Radical Cystectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malnutrition in a prevalent problem in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Preoperative malnutrition has been shown to contribute to increased rates of postoperative complications. Given the significant morbidity and mortality of the procedure of radical cystectomy, there is potential for improvement in patient outcomes by nutritional intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prospective studies have demonstrated a reduction in postoperative infection rates in patients who receive supplemental immunonutrition prior to major surgery including radical cystectomy. These initial evaluations of nutritional optimization show significant potential for improved outcomes. Additionally, several studies using enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, which include a preoperative nutritional component, have shown a benefit in reducing length of stay. Emerging literature has shown the benefits of preoperative immunonutrition in improving postoperative outcomes of radical cystectomy. However, further work is needed to determine the best mechanism to optimize nutrition prior to radical cystectomy.

Supportive interventions to improve physiological and psychological health outcomes among patients undergoing cystectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Our understanding of effective perioperative supportive interventions for patients undergoing cystectomy procedures and how these may affect short and long-term health outcomes is limited.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials involving any non-surgical, perioperative interventions designed to support or improve the patient experience for patients undergoing cystectomy procedures were reviewed. Comparison groups included those exposed to usual clinical care or standard procedure. Studies were excluded if they involved surgical procedure only, involved bowel preparation only or involved an alternative therapy such as aromatherapy. Any short and long-term outcomes reflecting the patient experience or related urological health outcomes were considered.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles (representing 15 individual studies) were included for review. Heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes across studies meant meta-analyses were not possible. Participants were all patients with bladder cancer and interventions were delivered over different stages of the perioperative period. The overall quality of evidence and reporting was low and outcomes were predominantly measured in the short-term. However, the findings show potential for exercise therapy, pharmaceuticals, ERAS protocols, psychological/educational programmes, chewing gum and nutrition to benefit a broad range of physiological and psychological health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Supportive interventions to date have taken many different forms with a range of potentially meaningful physiological and psychological health outcomes for cystectomy patients. Questions remain as to what magnitude of short-term health improvements would lead to clinically relevant changes in the overall patient experience of surgery and long-term recovery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Cystectomy Is Safe and Accelerates Bowel Function Recovery

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was associated with a faster bowel function recovery and no increase in morbidity compared with standard perioperative care in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

METHODS

A prospective single-center single-surgeon cohort of 114 consecutive patients treated with open radical cystectomy between July 2013 and June 2016 was analyzed. A study group of 74 patients with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was compared with a control group of 40 patients with standard perioperative care. Primary outcome was recovery of bowel function, measured by resumption of bowel sounds, passage of flatus, and passage of stool. Secondary outcome was rate of overall and major 90-day postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Bowel function recovery was significantly faster in the study group. Resumption of bowel sounds on postoperative day 1 was recorded in 43 (58%) vs 4 (10%) patients, passage of flatus within postoperative day 2 in 41 (55%) vs 11 (28%) patients, and passage of stool within postoperative day 3 in 37 (50%) vs no patients in the study vs control group, respectively (P < .01 for all). Overall and major 90-day complications were observed in 35 (47.3%) and 13 (17.6%) patients in the study group, and in 25 (62.5%) and 9 (22.5%) patients in the control group (P = .14 and 0.38, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing open radical cystectomy, an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway allowed a significantly faster bowel function recovery with no increase in 90-day postoperative complications compared with standard perioperative care.

Perioperative Preparation and Nutritional Considerations for Patients Undergoing Urinary Diversion

Patients undergoing urinary diversion are at high risk for complications in the perioperative period. The exact cause of these complications remains poorly defined but is likely multifactorial. Current efforts to optimize patients in the perioperative period, including prehabilitation, smoking cessation, recognition and treatment of comorbid conditions and malnutrition, immunonutrition supplementation, carbohydrate loading, and prevention of known complications and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways, seem beneficial in helping to improve outcomes in this at-risk population. Further studies (some of which are ongoing) are necessary to help optimize these strategies and identify which modifiable factors have the greatest impact.

Surgical Complications of Urinary Diversion

Urinary diversion (UD) with an intestinal segment has significant risks of short- and long-term complications. With modern reporting criteria, understanding of the true prevalence and spectrum of these complications has improved. Methods to minimize early postoperative complications include enhanced recovery pathways, restricted intraoperative fluid protocols, and referral to high-volume centers. With long-term follow-up after UD, the risk of complications steadily rises. Late surgical complications include ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures, urolithiasis, and stomal issues. Patients with UDs require close surveillance to monitor for anatomic, infectious, and metabolic complications and surgeons who perform UD should be aware of the risk and timing of postoperative complications.

Short-term outcome after cystectomy: comparison of early oral feeding in an enhanced recovery protocol and feeding using Bengmark nasojejunal tube

PURPOSE

Cystectomy for bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications. Standardized perioperative protocols, such as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, aim to improve postoperative outcome. Postoperative feeding strategies are an important part of these protocols. In this two-centre study, we compared complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) between an ERAS protocol with early oral nutrition and a protocol with early enteral feeding with a Bengmark nasojejunal tube.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 154 consecutive patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer in two hospitals (Hospital A and B) between 2014 and 2016. Hospital A uses an ERAS protocol (n = 45), which encourages early introduction of an oral diet. Hospital B uses a fast-track protocol comprising feeding with a Bengmark nasojejunal tube (Bengmark-protocol, n = 109). LOS and complications according to Clavien classification were compared between protocols.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day complication rates in the ERAS and Bengmark protocol were similar (64.4 and 67.0%, respectively; p = 0.463). The rate of postoperative ileus (POI) was significantly lower in the Bengmark protocol (11.9% vs. 34.4% in the ERAS protocol, p = 0.009). This association remained significant after adjustment for other variables (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.96; p = 0.042). Median LOS did not differ significantly between protocols (10 days vs. 11 days in the ERAS and Bengmark protocols, respectively; p = 0.861).

CONCLUSIONS

Early oral nutrition in Hospital A was well tolerated. However, the Bengmark protocol was superior with respect to occurrence of POI. A prospective study may clarify whether the lower rate of POI was due to the use of early nasojejunal tube feeding or other reasons.

Advances in surgical management of muscle invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer remains a disease of the elderly with relatively few advances that have improved survival over the last 20 years. Radical cystectomy (RC) has long remained the principal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed was performed. The content was reviewed for continuity with the topic of surgical advances in MIBC. Articles and society guidelines were included in this review.

RESULTS

Despite the associated morbidity, even in the elderly, RC is still a reasonable option. Modifications during RC may have a positive or negative impact on survival and quality of life. The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection is one such factor which may positively impact survival outcomes. In addition, preservation of pelvic organs, robotic surgery and the adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery principles continues to improve the postoperative recovery and quality of life in RC patients.

CONCLUSION

There are some ongoing studies in many of these areas, but overall the new advances in MIBC may improve patient quality and quantity of life. The advances in surgical treatment of MIBC are important and the focus of the review here.