1
|
van der Heijden AG, Bruins HM, Carrion A, Cathomas R, Compérat E, Dimitropoulos K, Efstathiou JA, Fietkau R, Kailavasan M, Lorch A, Martini A, Mertens LS, Meijer RP, Mariappan P, Milowsky MI, Neuzillet Y, Panebianco V, Sæbjørnsen S, Smith EJ, Thalmann GN, Rink M. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2025 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2025; 87:582-600. [PMID: 40118736 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2025] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/25/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This publication represents a summary of the updated 2025 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (MMIBC). The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of MMIBC with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. METHODS For the 2025 guidelines, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with MMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of MMIBC patients and the importance of shared decision-making with patients. The key changes in the 2025 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) guidelines include the following: a new recommendation for the use of susceptible FGFR3 alterations to select patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma for treatment with erdafitinib; significant adaption and update of the recommendations for pre- and postoperative radiotherapy and sexual organ-preserving techniques in women; new recommendation related to radical cystectomy and extent of lymph node dissection based on the results of the SWOG trial; recommendation related to hospital volume; new recommendations for salvage cystectomy after trimodality therapy and for the management of all patients who are candidates for trimodality bladder-preserving treatment in a multidisciplinary team setting using a shared decision-making process; significant adaption and update to the recommendation for adjuvant nivolumab in selected patients with pT3/4 and/or pN+ disease not eligible for, or who declined, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and addition of a new recommendation for metastatic disease regarding the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in case of HER2 overexpression; in addition, removal of the recommendations on sacituzumab govitecan as the manufacturer has withdrawn the US Food and Drug Administration approval for this product; update of the follow-up of MIBC; and full update of the management algorithms of MIBC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This overview of the 2025 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and follow-up of MIBC patients and is designed for effective integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Carrion
- Department of Urology, Vall Hebron Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Param Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodriguez Peñaranda N, di Bello F, Marmiroli A, Falkenbach F, Longoni M, Le QC, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Graefen M, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Stella G, Piro A, Puliatti S, Micali S, Karakiewicz PI. Urinary Diversion Versus Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:2233-2240. [PMID: 39656392 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16644-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare adverse in-hospital outcomes in ileal conduit versus neobladder urinary diversion type after radical cystectomy (RC) in contemporary versus historical patients. METHODS Patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS 2000-2019). Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:2 ratio) and multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were used. RESULTS Of 10,533 contemporary (2011-2019) patients, 943 (9.0%) underwent neobladder urinary diversion, while 9590 (91.0%) underwent ileal conduit urinary diversion. Furthermore, of 9742 historical (2010-2019) patients, 932 (9.6%) underwent neobladder urinary diversion and 8810 (90.4%) underwent ileal conduit urinary diversion. After 1:2 PSM, within the contemporary cohort, 943/943 (100%) neobladder versus 1886/9590 (19.6%) ileal conduit patients were included. Similarly, within the historical cohort, 932/932 (100%) neobladder versus 1864/8810 (21.1%) ileal conduit patients were included after PSM. In multivariable LRMs, relative to contemporary neobladder patients, contemporary ileal conduit patients exhibited higher rates of overall postoperative (49.0 vs. 43.6%; multivariable odds ratio [MOR] 1.2), wound (4.2 vs. 2.7%; MOR 1.6), and genitourinary (13.1% vs. 10.0%; MOR 1.3) complications as well as blood transfusions (19.0 vs. 15.6%; MOR 1.3). Conversely, in multivariable LRMs within the historical cohort, no differences were recorded between ileal conduit and neobladder patients. CONCLUSIONS Unlike historical comparisons between ileal conduit and neobladder patients, where no differences in adverse in-hospital outcomes were recorded, analyses relying on a contemporary patient cohort subject to PSM and multivariable adjustment revealed higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes in 4/13 examined categories. This observation should be considered at informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Francesco di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Stella
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Adele Piro
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barone B, Napolitano L, Reccia P, Calace FP, De Luca L, Olivetta M, Stizzo M, Rubinacci A, Della Rosa G, Lecce A, Romano L, Sciorio C, Spirito L, Mattiello G, Vastarella MG, Papi S, Calogero A, Varlese F, Tataru OS, Ferro M, Del Biondo D, Napodano G, Vastarella V, Lucarelli G, Balsamo R, Fusco F, Crocetto F, Amicuzi U. Advances in Urinary Diversion: From Cutaneous Ureterostomy to Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction-A Comprehensive Review. J Pers Med 2024; 14:392. [PMID: 38673019 PMCID: PMC11051023 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer ranks as the 10th most prevalent cancer globally with an increasing incidence. Radical cystectomy combined with urinary diversion represents the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, offering a range of techniques tailored to patient factors. Overall, urinary diversions are divided into non-continent and continent. Among the first category, cutaneous ureterostomy and ileal conduit represent the most common procedures while in the second category, it could be possible to describe another subclassification which includes ureterosigmoidostomy, continent diversions requiring catheterization and orthotopic voiding pouches and neobladders. In this comprehensive review, urinary diversions are described in their technical aspects, providing a summary of almost all alternatives to urinary diversion post-radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biagio Barone
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (F.F.); (U.A.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Pasquale Reccia
- Urology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.R.); (F.P.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Francesco Paolo Calace
- Urology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.R.); (F.P.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Luigi De Luca
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Multispecialty, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Michelangelo Olivetta
- Urology Unit, Gaetano Fucito Hospital, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, 84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy;
| | - Marco Stizzo
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Andrea Rubinacci
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Giampiero Della Rosa
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Arturo Lecce
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Romano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | | | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Gennaro Mattiello
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Maria Giovanna Vastarella
- Gynaecology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Papi
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (F.V.)
| | - Filippo Varlese
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of General Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (F.V.)
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, The Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies (I.O.S.U.D.), George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology from Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Dario Del Biondo
- Department of Urology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.D.B.); (G.N.)
| | - Giorgio Napodano
- Department of Urology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (D.D.B.); (G.N.)
| | - Vincenzo Vastarella
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Department, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Raffaele Balsamo
- Urology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.R.); (F.P.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (F.F.); (U.A.)
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (A.R.); (G.D.R.); (A.L.); (L.R.); (G.M.); (S.P.); (F.C.)
| | - Ugo Amicuzi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (F.F.); (U.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wombwell A, Lobo N, Khan MS, Thurairaja R. Ileal conduit obstruction secondary to tethering of the small bowel anastomosis to the pubic bone. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e258418. [PMID: 38182174 PMCID: PMC10773287 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-258418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
We present the case of a late 60s male who presented to hospital 3 years postradical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion with polyuria and acute kidney injury. CT of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB) revealed mild hydronephrosis of a solitary left kidney and a 3-cm calculus in the ileal conduit. The patient subsequently underwent a laparotomy which revealed the cause of obstruction to be tethering of the small bowel anastomosis to the pubic bone. The conduit was excised with the calculus in situ and a new conduit was fashioned. The patient recovered from surgery without complication, and his kidney function improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Wombwell
- Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Niyati Lobo
- Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alfred Witjes J, Max Bruins H, Carrión A, Cathomas R, Compérat E, Efstathiou JA, Fietkau R, Gakis G, Lorch A, Martini A, Mertens LS, Meijer RP, Milowsky MI, Neuzillet Y, Panebianco V, Redlef J, Rink M, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Sæbjørnsen S, Veskimäe E, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2024; 85:17-31. [PMID: 37858453 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 212.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT We present an overview of the updated 2023 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (MMIBC). OBJECTIVE To provide practical evidence-based recommendations and consensus statements on the clinical management of MMIBC with a focus on diagnosis and treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the MMIBC guidelines has been performed annually since 2017. Searches cover the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries databases for yearly guideline updates. A level of evidence and strength of recommendation are assigned. The evidence cutoff date for the 2023 MIBC guidelines was May 4, 2022. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Patients should be counselled regarding risk factors for bladder cancer. Pathologists should describe tumour and lymph nodes in detail, including the presence of histological subtypes. The importance of the presence or absence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the prostatic urethra is emphasised. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bladder is superior to computed tomography (CT) for disease staging, specifically in differentiating T1 from T2 disease, and may lead to a change in treatment approach in patients at high risk of an invasive tumour. Imaging of the upper urinary tract, lymph nodes, and distant metastasis is performed with CT or MRI; the additional value of flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT still needs to be determined. Frail and comorbid patients should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative histology remains the most important prognostic variable, while circulating tumour DNA appears to be an interesting predictive marker. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy remains cisplatin-based. In motivated and selected women and men, sexual organ-preserving cystectomy results in better functional outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes. Robotic and open cystectomy have comparable outcomes and should be combined with (extended) lymph node dissection. The diversion type is an individual choice after taking patient and tumour characteristics into account. Radical cystectomy remains a highly complex procedure with considerable morbidity and risk of mortality, although lower rates are observed for higher hospital volumes (>20 cases/yr). With proper patient selection, trimodal therapy (chemoradiation) has comparable outcomes to radical cystectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery improves disease-specific survival and overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk disease who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment, and is strongly recommended. There is a weak recommendation for adjuvant nivolumab, as OS data are not yet available. Health-related quality of life should be assessed using validated questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. Surveillance is needed to monitor for recurrent cancer and functional outcomes. Recurrences detected on follow-up seem to have better prognosis than symptomatic recurrences. CONCLUSIONS This summary of the 2023 EAU guidelines provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of MMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology guidelines panel on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer has released an updated version of the guideline containing information on diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Recommendations are based on studies published up to May 4, 2022. Surgical removal of the bladder and bladder preservation are discussed, as well as updates on the use of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in localised and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Carrión
- Department of Urology, Vall Hebron Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - John Redlef
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ayoub CH, Dakroub A, El-Asmar JM, Ali AH, Beaini H, Abdulfattah S, El Hajj A. Preoperative MELD score predicts mortality and adverse outcomes following radical cystectomy: analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221135944. [PMID: 36407007 PMCID: PMC9669693 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221135944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been widely used to predict the mortality and morbidity of various surgical procedures. Objectives We aimed to correlate a high preoperative MELD score with adverse 30-day postoperative complications following radical cystectomy. Design and Methods Patients who underwent elective, non-emergency radical cystectomy were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2017. Patients were categorized according to a calculated MELD score. The primary outcomes of this study were 30-day postoperative mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay following radical cystectomy. For further sensitivity analysis, propensity score matching was used to yield a total of 1387 matched pairs and primary outcomes were also assessed in the matched cohort. Results Compared with patients with a MELD < 10, those with MELD ⩾ 10 had significantly higher rates of mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.71, p = 0.004], major complications (OR = 1.42, p < 0.001), and prolonged hospital stay (OR = 1.29, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Following risk-adjustment for race, propensity-matched groups revealed that patients with MELD score ⩾ 10 were significantly associated with higher mortality (OR = 1.85, p = 0.008), major complications (OR = 1.34, p < 0.001), yet similar length of hospital stay (OR = 1.17, p = 0.072). Conclusion MELD score ⩾ 10 is associated with higher mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing radical cystectomy compared with lower MELD scores. Risk-stratification using MELD score may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients to provide adequate preoperative counseling, optimize perioperative conditions, and even consider nonsurgical alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Habib Ayoub
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ali Dakroub
- American University of Beirut Medical School,
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jose M. El-Asmar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Adel Hajj Ali
- Cleveland Clinic, Heart, Vascular &
Thoracic Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Hadi Beaini
- American University of Beirut Medical School,
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Suhaib Abdulfattah
- American University of Beirut Medical School,
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Albert El Hajj
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO BOX: 11-0236, Riad El Solh,
Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|