1
|
Hanna P, Zabell J, Konety B, Warlick C. Perioperative complications and oncological outcomes of open versus robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score-matched study. World J Urol 2024; 42:220. [PMID: 38587653 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04907-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a comparative effectiveness analysis between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open approach (ORC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving all patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for invasive bladder cancer at our institution from 2010 to 2018. Of a total 296 patients, we matched ORC and RARC cases based on age, BMI, Charlson comorbidity index, pathological TN staging of the tumor, prior radiotherapy, and type of diversion. The perioperative complications and oncological outcomes were compared. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients were matched in the ORC and RARC groups. The median operative time was longer in RARC group (430 min) than that of ORC group (372 min) (p = 0.03); however, the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in RARC group (500 ml) than that of ORC (700 ml) (p < 0.0001). The median length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly reduced in the RARC group (7 days) compared to the ORC group (8 days) (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between both groups in 30- and 90-day postoperative complications (p = 0.3 and p = 0.2, respectively). A total of 68 deaths (38.2%) were observed, of which 36 (40.4%) were in ORC group while 32 (36%) were in RARC group (p = 0.5). The results were comparable in both groups regarding 5-year survival rate and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.3 and p = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSION RARC showed better perioperative outcomes in the form of less EBL and shortened LOS compared to ORC group. However, both RARC and ORC provide similar postoperative oncologic control, in terms of similar positive surgical margins, cancer-specific rates, and 5-year survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hanna
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Department of Urology, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
| | - Joseph Zabell
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noda M, Nakamura M, Kawai T, Sato Y, Yamada Y, Akiyama Y, Yamada D, Suzuki M, Kume H. Early recurrence of bladder cancer in the colon after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Disappearance following dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin treatment. IJU Case Rep 2021; 4:429-432. [PMID: 34755076 PMCID: PMC8560432 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The popularity of robot-assisted radical cystectomy over open radical cystectomy has been increasing because the former, a minimally invasive surgery, contributes to earlier recovery and shorter hospitalization. However, atypical recurrences may be more frequent after robot-assisted radical cystectomy than after open radical cystectomy. We report a case of an atypical early recurrence of bladder cancer including the descending colon. CASE PRESENTATION A 70-year-old Japanese man underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Four months later, he was hospitalized for severe anemia (hemoglobin, 5.1 g/dL). Colonoscopy revealed a 4-cm submucosal oozing tumor in the descending colon. Computed tomography revealed multiple recurrent lesions including recurrence in the descending colon, all of which disappeared completely after chemotherapy with six cycles of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. CONCLUSION We encountered a rare case of an atypical recurrence of bladder cancer in the colon after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michio Noda
- Department of UrologyMitsui Memorial HospitalJapan
| | - Masaki Nakamura
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
- Department of UrologyNTT Medical CenterJapan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
| | - Yoshiyuki Akiyama
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
| | - Daisuke Yamada
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
| | - Motofumi Suzuki
- Department of UrologyTokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of UrologyGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wijburg CJ, Michels CTJ, Hannink G, Grutters JPC, Rovers MM, Alfred Witjes J. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study. Eur Urol 2021; 79:609-618. [PMID: 33446375 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer is known for its high risk of complications. Although open radical cystectomy (ORC) is regarded as the standard treatment, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is increasingly used in practice, despite the fact that high-quality evidence comparing the effectiveness of both techniques is lacking. OBJECTIVE To study the effectiveness of RARC compared with that of ORC, in terms of 90 d complications (Clavien-Dindo), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective comparative effectiveness study was conducted in 19 Dutch centres, expert in either ORC or RARC. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30, 90, and 365 d. INTERVENTION Standard ORC or RARC with PLND, using a standardised perioperative protocol. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was any-grade complications after 90 d. Secondary outcomes included HRQOL, complications (minor, major, 30 d, and 365 d), and clinical outcomes. Differences were calculated as risk differences (RDs) between the groups with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential baseline differences by means of propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between March 2016 and November 2018, 348 patients were included (n = 168 for ORC, n = 180 for RARC). At 90 d, any-grade complication rates were 63% for ORC and 56% for RARC (RD -6.4%, 95% CI -17 to 4.5). Major complication rates were 15% for ORC and 16% for RARC (RD 0.9%, 95% CI -7.0 to 8.8). Total minor complication rates were 57% for ORC and 49% for RARC (RD -7.6%, 95% CI -19 to 3.6). Analyses showed no statistically significant differences in HRQOL between ORC and RARC. Some differences were found in the secondary outcomes in favour of either RARC or ORC. The major drawback inherent to the design comprises residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS This multicentre comparative effectiveness study showed no statistically significant differences between ORC and RARC in terms of complications and HRQOL. PATIENT SUMMARY This multicentre study did not show differences in overall complication rates, health-related quality of life, mortality, and clinical and oncological outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl J Wijburg
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte T J Michels
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke P C Grutters
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moschini M, Zamboni S, Soria F, Mathieu R, Xylinas E, Tan WS, Kelly JD, Simone G, Meraney A, Krishna S, Konety B, Mattei A, Baumeister P, Mordasini L, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gallina A, Stabile A, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Rink M, Necchi A, Karakiewicz PI, Rouprêt M, Koupparis A, Kassouf W, Scherr DS, Ploussard G, Boorjian SA, Lotan Y, Sooriakumaran P, Shariat SF. Open Versus Robotic Cystectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Comparing Survival Outcomes. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8081192. [PMID: 31395826 PMCID: PMC6722857 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8081192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess the differential effect of robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) on survival outcomes in matched analyses performed on a large multicentric cohort. Methods: The study included 9757 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) treated in a consecutive manner at each of 25 institutions. All patients underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching 2:1 was performed with two ORC patients matched to one RARC patient. The propensity-matched cohort included 1374 patients. Multivariable competing risk analyses accounting for death of other causes, tested association of surgical technique with recurrence and cancer specific mortality (CSM), before and after propensity score matching. Results: Overall, 767 (7.8%) patients underwent RARC and 8990 (92.2%) ORC. The median follow-up before and after propensity matching was 81 and 102 months, respectively. In the overall population, the 3-year recurrence rates and CSM were 37% vs. 26% and 34% vs. 24% for ORC vs. RARC (all p values > 0.1), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, RARC and ORC had similar recurrence and CSM rates before and after matching (all p values > 0.1). Conclusions: Patients treated with RARC and ORC have similar survival outcomes. This data is helpful in consulting patients until long term survival outcomes of level one evidence is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Zamboni
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology Bichat Hospital, Paris Descartes University, 75877 Paris, France
| | - Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery and Intervention Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Intervention Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Anoop Meraney
- Urology Division, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
| | - Suprita Krishna
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Baumeister
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Livio Mordasini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Department of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Anthony Koupparis
- Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H4A3J1, Canada
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10038, USA
| | | | - Stephen A Boorjian
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- Department of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London W1T 4EU, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA.
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|