Intraoperative prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy to reduce bladder recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy

The role of intravesical chemotherapy following nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intravesical recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy occurs in 22% to 47%. Intravesical chemotherapy is still underused due to concerns about its efficacy and safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical chemotherapy regimens in reducing the risk of intravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify reports published until March 2024. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The outcomes measured were intravesical recurrence rates and complications in patients treated with different intravesical instillation chemotherapy and timing after radical nephroureterectomy. Sub-analyses were performed on randomized controlled trials and studies involving patients with no history of bladder cancer.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria, and data from 2,483 patients were reviewed. Intravesical chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of intravesical recurrence at 12 months (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.65; P < 0.001;) and at 24 months (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.61; P < 0.001). Notably, no association was found when confronting intra and postoperative instillations (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.34-1.28; P = 0.2), nor single vs. multiple instillation (OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 0.75-2.50; P = 0.3). The pooled rate for minor and major complications was 9% and 0.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that intravesical chemotherapy significantly reduces intravesical recurrence rates after radical nephroureterectomy at 12 and 24 months. Additionally, it underscores the favorable safety profile of intravesical chemotherapy, with a low incidence of major complications. The ideal instillation scheme and chemotherapy agent should be further defined.

Hydrogel-based formulations for urothelial cancer therapy

Drug infusion therapy after surgery for urothelial carcinoma is an effective measure to reduce cancer recurrence rate. Hydrogels are drug carriers with good biocompatibility and high drug loading capacity, which can optimize the pharmacokinetics of drugs in the urinary system to improve the therapeutic effect. Compared with the traditional free drug in situ perfusion, the hydrogel drug loading system can still maintain effective drug concentration in the face of continuous urinary flushing due to its good mucosal adhesion effect. The significantly prolonged drug retention time can not only improve the therapeutic effect of drugs, but also reduce the discomfort and risk of urinary tract infections caused by frequent drug infusion, and improve patient compliance. In addition, the combination of hydrogel with nanoparticles and magnetic materials can also improve the mucosal permeability and targeting effect of the hydrogel drug loading system, so as to overcome the mucus layer of urinary epithelium and the physiological barrier of tumor and minimize the impact on normal tissue and cell functions. At present, the research of hydrogels for urothelial cancer treatment involves chemotherapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, inhibition of metabolism and multi strategy synergistic therapy. This review summarizes the research progress of hydrogels for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, hoping to provide a reference for the future research of safe, reliable, effective, and advanced hydrogels with little side effects.

Intravesical Therapy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) poses unique challenges in diagnosis and treatment. This comprehensive review focuses on prophylactic intravesical therapy for UTUC, summarizing key aspects of intravesical therapy in various clinical scenarios, including concurrent with or following radical nephroureterectomy, kidney-sparing surgery, ureteroscopy-guided biopsy. The incidence of intravesical recurrence in UTUC after surgical treatment is significant, necessitating effective preventive measures. Intravesical therapy plays a vital role in reducing the risk of bladder recurrence following UTUC surgery. Tailoring timing, drug selection, dosage, and frequency is vital in optimizing treatment outcomes and reducing intravesical recurrence risk in UTUC. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the history, clinical trials, guideline recommendations, and clinical applications of intravesical therapy for UTUC. It also discusses the future directions based on current clinical needs and ongoing trials. Future directions entail optimizing dosage, treatment duration, and drug selection, as well as exploring novel agents and combination therapies. Intravesical therapy holds tremendous potential in improving outcomes for UTUC patients and reducing the risk of bladder recurrence. Although advancements have been made in UTUC treatment research, further refinements are necessary to enhance efficacy and safety.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab).

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

Assessment of Therapeutic Benefit and Option Strategy on Intravesical Instillation for Preventing Bladder Cancer Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Objective

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is a very aggressive disease, characterized by 22%–50% of patients suffering from subsequent bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Although the therapy of intravesical instillation is reported to be effective in preventing bladder recurrence, no study had been reported in Northeast China. The findings relating to the clinical effectiveness of intravesical instillation after RNU are somewhat controversial, and the best efficacy and least adverse effects of instillation drugs have not been widely accepted. Here, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intravesical instillation for the prevention intravesical recurrence systematically.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, from October 2006 to September 2017, 158 UUT-UC patients underwent RNU were divided into 4 groups: epirubicin (EPB) instillation group, hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) instillation group, bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) instillation group, and noninstillation group. Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify the risk factors for intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS). The nomogram model was also applied to predict patient outcomes. Subsequently, to evaluate the clinical significance of intravesical instillation comprehensively, several databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Embase were searched and data from published studies with our results were combined by direct meta-analysis. Moreover, a network meta-analysis comparing instillation therapies was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of different instillation drugs.

Results

In our retrospective cohort study, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve demonstrated noninstillation groups were associated with worsened IVRFS. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis indicated that intravesical instillation was independent protective factors for IVRFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.731). Moreover, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC) values, and the C-index showed the priority of nomogram's predictive accuracy. Next, direct meta-analysis including 19 studies showed that intravesical instillation could prevent the recurrence of bladder cancer with a pooled risk ratio (RR) estimate of 0.53. Subgroup analysis by study type, year of intravesical recurrence, first instillation time, and instillation times also confirmed the robustness of the results. Moreover, intraoperative instillation was associated with a decrease in the risk of bladder recurrence compared with postoperative instillation. Then, a network meta-analysis including 7 studies indicated that pirarubicin (THP) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.2%) is the most effective therapy to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence, followed by BCG (SUCRA = 83.5%), mitomycin C (MMC) (SUCRA = 53.6%), EPB (SUCRA = 52.6%), and HCPT (SUCRA = 5.1%) after the analysis of the value ranking.

Conclusions

A maintenance schedule of intravesical instillation prevents the recurrence of bladder cancer after RNU in UUT-UC patients effectively. Large, prospective trials are needed to further confirm its value. Compared with other chemotherapy regimens, THP may be a promising drug with favorable efficacy to prevent bladder recurrence. As included studies had moderate risk of bias, the results of network meta-analysis should be applied with caution.

Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care?

Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. Current guidelines strongly recommend radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template-based lymph node dissection for all high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinomas. Although the open approach is still considered the standard of care, evolution of minimally invasive approaches especially the robotic-assisted approach, has been found to be oncologically equivalent. Since its initial description in 2006, the surgical technique as well as the robotic surgical system has gone through a major evolution. With well-established advantages of the minimally invasive approach, robotic radical nephroureterectomy also has the ability to address both upper and lower urinary tract simultaneously without the need of patient repositioning, standardized single docking technique, ease of performing crucial steps like excision of ureterovesical junction and bladder cuff with watertight cystotomy closure, allowing perioperative instillation of intra-vesical chemotherapy. Robot-assisted radical nephro-ureterectomy and template-based lymph node dissection is gradually emerging as the current standard of care to achieve the best possible oncologic and functional outcomes. In this review article we are focusing on the evolution of this approach in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma along with a review of oncologic outcomes.

Robot-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy

First proposed by Kimball and Ferris in 1933 for the treatment of papillary tumors in the upper urinary tract, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision remains the gold standard for management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma involving the proximal ureter and/or pelvicaliceal system. Over three decades since the first description of laparoscopic RNU, minimally invasive approaches to RNU have continued to evolve and become increasingly utilized. More recently, robot-assisted RNU (RARNU) has increasingly become a viable approach. Specifically, RARNU affords a reduction in perioperative morbidity and improved convalescence as a minimally invasive approach, all while adhering to traditional open surgical principles and providing surgeons with improved technical ergonomics and streamlined operating room logistics, particularly with the advent of the da Vinci Xi platform. In this study, we describe our approach to transperitoneal RARNU, including indications, operating room setup, step-by-step surgical technique, and perioperative care.