1
|
Rodler S, Danninger D, Eismann L, Kazmierczak PM, Jokisch F, Li M, Becker A, Kretschmer A, Stief C, Westhofen T. Health-related quality of life following salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or focal therapy. World J Urol 2024; 42:242. [PMID: 38635030 PMCID: PMC11026200 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04945-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is an important treatment option for patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after radiotherapy (RT) or focal therapy (FT). However, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after sRP depending on the primary treatment is understudied. METHODS Patients who underwent Salvage RP for recurrent PCa were analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was HRQOL assessed by the quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and its prostate specific QLQ-PR25 add-on. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome parameters (erectile function, continence) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). Statistical analyses employed the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kaplan-Meier method, with a p value < 0.05 denoting significance. RESULTS 37 patients with RT as primary treatment (RT-sRP) and 22 patients with focal therapy prior sRP (FT-sRP) were analyzed. Mean global health score was not significantly different preoperatively (71.9 vs. 67.3, p = 0.89) as well as after a median of 32 months follow-up (54.9 vs. 50.6, p = 0.63) with impaired HRQOL after sRP in both groups. Baseline erectile dysfunction was more prevalent in the RT-sRP group (mean IIEF-5: 5.0) than in the FT-sRP group (mean IIEF-5: 8.5, p = 0.037). No differences were observed at follow-up for erectile function (IIEF-5-Score: 0.5 vs 2.5, p = 0.199) and continence (continence rate: 48.4% vs 52.9% (p = 0.763) between the RT-sRP and FT-sRP group. 5-year-BRFS was 60% (RT-sRP) and 68% (FT-sRP, p = 0.849). CONCLUSIONS sRP impacts HRQOL in patients with PCa after RT and FT with no significant differences. Comparison with HRQOL and BRFS of treatment alternatives is paramount to counsel patients for appropriate treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Dina Danninger
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Friedrich Jokisch
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Armin Becker
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Light A, Lazic S, Houghton K, Bayne M, Connor MJ, Tam H, Ahmed HU, Shah TT, Barwick TD. Diagnostic Performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Versus Multiparametric MRI for Detection of Intraprostatic Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:379-385. [PMID: 38212074 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
For men with prostate cancer who develop biochemical failure after radiotherapy, European guidelines recommend reimaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). However, the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting intraprostatic recurrences is unclear, both with and without mpMRI. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of a series of patients investigated for radiorecurrence between 2016 and 2022 is described. All patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and prostate biopsy. PET/CT images were interpreted independently by 2 expert readers masked to other imaging and clinical data. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT versus mpMRI and of PET/CT with mpMRI together versus mpMRI alone. The secondary outcome was the proportion of cancers missed by mpMRI but detected by PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy analysis was performed at the prostate hemigland level using cluster bootstrapping. Results: Thirty-five men (70 hemiglands) were included. Cancer was confirmed by biopsy in 43 of 70 hemiglands (61%). PET/CT sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95), respectively, which were not significantly different from results by MRI (sensitivity of 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P = 0.1) (NPV of 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.75; P = 0.07). Specificity and positive predictive values were not significantly different. When PET/CT and MRI were used together, the sensitivity was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00) and NPV was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.75-1.00), both significantly higher than MRI alone (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Specificity and positive predictive values remained not significantly different. MRI missed 12 of 43 cancers (28%; 95% CI, 17%-43%), of which 11 of 12 (92%; 95% CI, 62%-100%) were detected by PET/CT. Conclusion: For detecting intraprostatic radiorecurrence, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has high sensitivity that is not significantly different from mpMRI. When 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI were used together, the results conferred a significantly greater sensitivity and NPV than with mpMRI alone. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT may therefore be a useful tool in the diagnosis of localized radiorecurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Light
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Lazic
- Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Kate Houghton
- Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Max Bayne
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Henry Tam
- Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tara D Barwick
- Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; and
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sciarra A, Santarelli V, Salciccia S, Moriconi M, Basile G, Santodirocco L, Carino D, Frisenda M, Di Pierro G, Del Giudice F, Gentilucci A, Bevilacqua G. How the Management of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Will Be Modified by the Concept of Anticipation and Incrementation of Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:764. [PMID: 38398155 PMCID: PMC10886975 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatments for prostate cancer (PC) is an extremely heterogeneous phase and at least a stratification into low- and high-risk cases for early progression in metastatic disease is necessary. At present, PSA-DT represents the best parameter to define low- and high-risk BCR PC, but real precision medicine is strongly suggested to define tailored management for patients with BCR. Before defining management, it is necessary to exclude the presence of low-volume metastasis associated with PSA progression using new-generation imaging, preferably with PSMA PET/CT. Low-risk BCR cases should be actively observed without early systemic therapies. Early treatment of low-risk BCR with continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can produce disadvantages such as the development of castration resistance before the appearance of metastases (non-metastatic castration-resistant PC). Patients with high-risk BCR benefit from early systemic therapy. Even with overall survival (OS) as the primary treatment endpoint, metastasis-free survival (MFS) should be used as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials, especially in long survival stages of the disease. The EMBARK study has greatly influenced the management of high-risk BCR, by introducing the concept of anticipation and intensification through the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and ADT combination therapy. In high-risk (PSA-DT ≤ 9 months) BCR cases, the combination of enzalutamide with leuprolide significantly improves MFS when compared to leuprolide alone, maintaining an unchanged quality of life in the asymptomatic phase of the disease. The possibility of using ARSIs alone in this early disease setting is suggested by the EMBARK study (arm with enzalutamide alone) with less evidence than with the intensification of the combination therapy. Continued use versus discontinuation of enzalutamide plus leuprolide intensified therapy upon reaching undetectable PSA levels needs to be better defined with further analysis. Real-world analysis must verify the significant results obtained in the context of a phase 3 study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Sciarra
- Department Materno Infantile e Scienze Urologiche, Sapienza University, Viale Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (S.S.); (M.M.); (G.B.); (L.S.); (D.C.); (M.F.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.G.); (A.G.); (G.B.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajwa P, Heidenreich J, Drzezga A, Schmidt M, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. The diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in primary staging of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: A single-center cohort analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:74-78. [PMID: 37750292 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a recommended imaging modality for patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Its routine implementation before radical prostatectomy (RP) may allow avoiding undertreatment. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for pelvic lymph node metastases in a large cohort of patients treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for high-risk PCa. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional database of patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT before RP and ePLND for high-risk PCa. The diagnostic estimates of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lymph node involvement were calculated. RESULTS We included 165 high-risk PCa patients. The median PSA value was 24.5 ng/mL (range: 6.7-185) and all the patients had biopsy Grade Group 4-5. In total, 46 (28%) of patients had clinical lymph node involvement at 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. A mean number of resected lymph nodes per patient was 22 (range: 15-45) and 149 (4.2%) of all resected nodes were positive for lymph node metastasis at final pathology. The diagnostic estimates for the detection of pN+ disease at RP were as follows: sensitivity 63% (95% CI: 51-75), specificity 97% (95% CI: 91-99), positive predictive value 94% (95% CI: 82-99), and negative predictive value 79% (95% CI: 70-86). The total accuracy of PSMA-PET was 83% (95% CI: 76-88). CONCLUSION Our analyses support high specificity and positive predictive value of pretreatment 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients treated with RP for high-risk PCa. While a positive finding should be considered as robust indicator for clinical decision-making, a negative result cannot reliably rule out the presence of lymph node involvement in high-risk PCa; there is a need for advanced risk stratification in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Julian Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Schmidt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saouli A, Ruffion A, Dariane C, Barret E, Fiard G, Hankard GF, Créhange G, Roubaud G, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Renard-Penna R, Gauthé M, Baboudjian M, Ploussard G, Rouprêt M. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review (French ccAFU). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5485. [PMID: 38001745 PMCID: PMC10670522 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically review the current evidence regarding the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) for recurrent prostate cancer. A systematic review was conducted throughout September 2022 using the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Embase databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. A total of 55 studies (3836 patients) met our eligibility criteria. The vast majority of men included had radiation therapy (including brachytherapy) as their first-line treatment (n = 3240, 84%). Other first-line treatments included HIFU (n = 338, 9%), electroporation (n = 59, 2%), proton beam therapy (n = 54, 1.5%), cryotherapy (n = 34, 1%), focal vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (n = 22, 0.6%), and transurethral ultrasound ablation (n = 19, 0.5%). Median preoperative PSA, at the time of recurrence, ranged from 1.5 to 14.4 ng/mL. The surgical approach was open in 2300 (60%) cases, robotic in 1465 (38%) cases, and laparoscopic in 71 (2%) cases. Since 2019, there has been a clear increase in robotic versus conventional surgery (1245 versus 525 cases, respectively). The median operative time and blood loss ranged from 80 to 297 min and 75 to 914 mL, respectively. Concomitant lymph node dissection was performed in 2587 cases (79%). The overall complication rate was 34%, with a majority of Clavien grade I or II complications. Clavien ≥ 3 complications ranged from 0 to 64%. Positive surgical margins were noted in 792 cases (32%). The median follow-up ranged from 4.6 to 94 months. Biochemical recurrence after sRP ranged from 8% to 51.5% at 12 months, from 0% to 66% at 22 months, and from 48% to 59% at 60 months. The specific and overall survival rates ranged from 13.4 to 98% and 62 to 100% at 5 years, respectively. Urinary continence was maintained in 52.1% of cases. sRP demonstrated acceptable oncological outcomes. These results, after sRP, are influenced by several factors, and above all by pre-treatment assessment, including imaging, with the development of mpMRI and metabolic imaging. Our results demonstrated that SRP can be considered a suitable treatment option for selected patients, but the level of evidence remains low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amine Saouli
- Department of Urology, CHU Souss Massa, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir 80000, Morocco
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service D’urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69002 Lyon, France;
- Équipe 2, Centre D’innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY), Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, 69002 Lyon, France
- Comité de Cancérologie de l’Association Française d’Urologie, Groupe Prostate, Maison de l’Urologie, 11, Rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; (G.F.); (M.G.)
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris University, U1151 Inserm-INEM, F-75015 Paris, France;
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France; (E.B.); (L.B.)
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Comité de Cancérologie de l’Association Française d’Urologie, Groupe Prostate, Maison de l’Urologie, 11, Rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; (G.F.); (M.G.)
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38400 Grenoble, France
| | | | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | | | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France; (E.B.); (L.B.)
| | | | - Mathieu Gauthé
- Comité de Cancérologie de l’Association Française d’Urologie, Groupe Prostate, Maison de l’Urologie, 11, Rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; (G.F.); (M.G.)
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Service D’urologie et de Transplantation Rénale, CHU La Conception, 13005 Marseille, France;
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France;
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moschovas MC, Bravi CA, Dell'Oglio P, Turri F, de Groote R, Liakos N, Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Di Maida F, Piramide F, Andras I, Breda A, Mottrie A, Patel V, Larcher A. Outcomes of Salvage Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the last decade: systematic review and perspectives of referral centers. Int Braz J Urol 2023; 49:677-687. [PMID: 37903005 PMCID: PMC10947626 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (S-RARP) has gained prominence in recent years for treating patients with cancer recurrence following non-surgical treatments of Prostate Cancer. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the role and outcomes of S-RARP over the past decade. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted, encompassing articles published between January 1st, 2013, and June 1st, 2023, on S-RARP outcomes. Articles were screened according to PRISMA guidelines, resulting in 33 selected studies. Data were extracted, including patient demographics, operative times, complications, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes. RESULTS Among 1,630 patients from 33 studies, radiotherapy was the most common primary treatment (42%). Operative times ranged from 110 to 303 minutes, with estimated blood loss between 50 to 745 mL. Intraoperative complications occurred in 0 to 9% of cases, while postoperative complications ranged from 0 to 90% (Clavien 1-5). Continence rates varied (from 0 to 100%), and potency rates ranged from 0 to 66.7%. Positive surgical margins were reported up to 65.6%, and biochemical recurrence ranged from 0 to 57%. CONCLUSION Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with cancer recurrence after previous prostate cancer treatment is safe and feasible. The literature is based on retrospective studies with inherent limitations describing low rates of intraoperative complications and small blood loss. However, potency and continence rates are largely reduced compared to the primary RARP series, despite the type of the primary treatment. Better-designed studies to assess the long-term outcomes and individually specify each primary therapy impact on the salvage treatment are still needed. Future articles should be more specific and provide more details regarding the previous therapies and S-RARP surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcio Covas Moschovas
- AdventHealth Global Robotics InstituteFloridaUSAAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Florida, USA
- University of Central FloridaFloridaUSAUniversity of Central Florida (UCF), Florida, USA
- ORSI AcademyGhentBelgiumORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of UrologyLondonUKDepartment of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaMilanItalyASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Turri
- La Statale UniversityASST Santi Paolo e CarloMilanItalyASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - La Statale University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben de Groote
- ORSI AcademyGhentBelgiumORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
- OLV HospitalDepartment of UrologyAalstBelgiumDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- University of Freiburg Medical CentreGermanyUniversity of Freiburg Medical Centre, Germany
| | - Mike Wenzel
- University Hospital FrankfurtGermanyUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Germany;
| | | | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- University of FlorenceFlorenceItalyUniversity of Florence, Florence, Italy;
| | - Federico Piramide
- University of TurinSan Luigi Gonzaga HospitalItalyUniversity of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyCluj-NapocaRomaniaIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Alberto Breda
- Autonoma University of Barcelona at Fundacio PuigvertBarcelonaSpainAutonoma University of Barcelona at Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- ORSI AcademyGhentBelgiumORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
- OLV HospitalDepartment of UrologyAalstBelgiumDepartment of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Vipul Patel
- AdventHealth Global Robotics InstituteFloridaUSAAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Florida, USA
- University of Central FloridaFloridaUSAUniversity of Central Florida (UCF), Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marra G, Calleris G, Conte F, Benfant N, Rajwa P, Ahmed M, Abreu A, Cacciamani G, Smith JA, Joniau S, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathcart P, Gill I, Karnes RJ, Tilki D, Shariat SF, Touijer K, Gontero P. Recurrent Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy or Ablation: Should We Observe Them All? Results from a Large Multicenter Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Consortium. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00194-3. [PMID: 37704503 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) yields poor functional outcomes and relatively high complication rates. Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) has genetic and clinical features showing little, if not absent, metastatic potential. However, the behavior of GS 6 PCa recurring after previous PCa treatment including radiotherapy and/or ablation has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the oncological outcomes of sRP for radio- and/or ablation-recurrent GS 6 PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective data of sRP for recurrent PCa after local nonsurgical treatment were collected from 14 tertiary referral centers from 2000 to 2021. INTERVENTION Prostate biopsy before sRP and sRP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A survival analysis was performed for pre-sRP biopsy and sRP-proven GS 6. Concordance between PCa at pre-sRP biopsy and sRP histology was assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We included GS 6 recurrent PCa at pre-sRP biopsy (n = 142) and at sRP (n = 50), as two cohorts. The majority had primary radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy (83.8% of GS 6 patients at pre-sRP biopsy; 78% of GS 6 patients at sRP) and whole-gland treatments (91% biopsy; 85.1% sRP). Biopsy GS 6 10-yr metastasis, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-89%), 98% (95-99%), and 89% (78-95%), respectively. Upgrading at sRP was 69%, 35.5% had a pT3 stage, and 13.4% had positive nodes. The sRP GS 6 10-yr metastasis-free survival, CSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, and 90% (95% CI 58-98%) respectively; pT3 and pN1 disease were found in 12% and 0%, respectively. Overall complications, high-grade complications, and severe incontinence were experienced by >50%, >10%, and >15% of men, respectively (in both the biopsy and the sRP cohorts). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and absence of a centralized pathological review. CONCLUSIONS GS 6 sRP-proven PCa recurring after nonsurgical primary treatment has almost no metastatic potential, while patients experience relevant morbidity of the procedure. However, a significant proportion of GS 6 cases at pre-sRP biopsy are upgraded at sRP. In the idea not to overtreat, efforts should be made to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pre-sRP biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the oncological results of salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer of Gleason score (GS) 6 category. We found a very low malignant potential of GS 6 confirmed at salvage radical prostatectomy despite surgical complications being relatively high. Nonetheless, biopsy GS 6 was frequently upgraded and had less optimal oncological control. Overtreatment for recurrent GS 6 after nonsurgical first-line treatment should be avoided, and efforts should be made to increase the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies for recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Francesca Conte
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicole Benfant
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohamed Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joseph A Smith
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lara Rodriguez-Sanchez
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA; Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Center: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Karim Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu Z, Chao H, Xu F, Deng H, Deng L, Song Z, Zeng T. Identification of a prognostic biomarker predicting biochemical recurrence and construction of a novel nomogram for prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1115718. [PMID: 37077837 PMCID: PMC10106702 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBiochemical recurrence (BCR) is common in prostate cancer (PCa), but its prediction is based predominantly on clinicopathological characteristics with low accuracy. We intend to identify a potential prognostic biomarker related to the BCR and construct a nomogram for improving the risk stratification of PCa patients.MethodsThe transcriptome and clinical data of PCa patients were obtained from TCGA and GEO databases. Differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were used to screen out differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the BCR of PCa. Cox regression analysis was further applied to screen out DEGs related to BCR-free survival (BFS). Time-dependent receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and Kaplan–Meier (K-M) survival analysis were conducted to assess the prognostic value. Then, a prognostic nomogram was established and evaluated. The clinicopathological correlation analysis, GSEA analysis, and immune analysis were used to explore the biological and clinical significance of the biomarker. Finally, the qRT-PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were conducted to validate the expression of the biomarker.ResultsBIRC5 was identified to be the potential prognostic biomarker. The clinical correlation analysis and K-M survival analysis found that the BIRC5 mRNA expression was positively associated with disease progression and negatively associated with the BFS rate. Time-dependent ROC curves verified its accurate prediction performance. The GSEA and immune analysis suggested that the BIRC5 was related to immunity. A nomogram with an accurate prediction for BFS of PCa patients was constructed. qRT-PCR, western blotting, and IHC results validated the expression level of BIRC5 in PCa cells and tissues.ConclusionOur study identified BIRC5 as a potential prognostic biomarker related to BCR of PCa and constructed an efficacy nomogram for predicting BFS to assist clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaojun Yu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
- Medical Department, Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
| | - Haichao Chao
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
| | - Fanghua Xu
- Pathology Department, The People’s Hospital of Pingxiang, Pingxiang, JiangXi, China
| | - Huanhuan Deng
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
- Medical Department, Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
| | - Leihong Deng
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
| | - Zhen Song
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
| | - Tao Zeng
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi, China
- *Correspondence: Tao Zeng,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rajwa P, Pfister D, Rieger C, Heidenreich J, Drzezga A, Persigehl T, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. Importance of magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Prostate 2023; 83:385-391. [PMID: 36564936 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate staging and identification of optimal candidates for local salvage therapy, such as salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), is necessary to ensure optimal care in patients with radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to analyze performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for predicting pathologic nonorgan confined disease (pT3) and lymph node involvement (pN+) in patients treated with SRP for radiorecurrent PCa. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the institutional database to identify patients who underwent MRI or 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT before SRP for radiorecurrent PCa. The diagnostic estimates of MRI and PSMA-PET/CT for pT3 and pN+, were calculated. RESULTS We identified 113 patients with radiorecurrent PCa who underwent preoperative MRI followed by SRP; 53 had preoperative 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. For the detection of pT3 disease, the overall accuracy of MRI was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-78), sensitivity 40% (95% CI 26-55) and specificity 94% (95% CI 85-98); PSMA-PET/CT had slightly higher accuracy of 77% (95% CI 64-88), and higher sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 68-99), but lower specificity of 70% (95% CI 51-84). For pN+ disease, MRI had poor sensitivity of 14% (95% CI 3-36), specificity of 50 (95% CI 39-61) and total accuracy of 43% (95% CI 34-53); PSMA-PET/CT had an accuracy of 85% (95% CI 72-93), sensitivity of 27% (95% CI 6-61), and specificity of 100% (95% CI 92-100). CONCLUSION In patients with radiorecurrent PCa, both, MRI, and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT are valuable tools for the pre-SRP staging and should be integrated into the standard workup. For lymph node metastases, 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a strong rule-in test with nearly perfect specificity; in contrast MRI had a low accuracy for lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Constantin Rieger
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julian Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nabavizadeh R, Karnes RJ. Salvage radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:163-167. [PMID: 36591993 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is underutilized because of fear of historical high rates of peri-operative morbidities. However, there has been significant improvements in complication rates as well as oncologic outcomes in the recent years. RECENT FINDINGS Complication rates have significantly declined for both open and robotic approach in the past decade. Rectal injury is now reported around 2%, which is down from 30% in the historic series. Similarly, the current risk of major vascular injury is low. About 75% of patients report social continence (up to one pad per day). However, erectile function recovery remains poor and patients should be counselled accordingly. Long-term durable oncologic response is achievable with 10-year recurrence-free survival reported in about 40-50% of well selected patients. SUMMARY Recent improvements in oncologic and peri-operative outcomes make sRP a desirable option for local control. sRP treats the whole gland as opposed to focal therapies and allows for pelvic lymph node dissection and removal of seminal vesicles, which can be sanctuary site of disease. In experienced hands, regardless of the surgical approach, sRP can achieve a durable response resulting in delaying or avoiding androgen deprivation therapy and its associated morbidities.
Collapse
|
11
|
Marra G, Marquis A, Yanagisawa T, Shariat SF, Touijer K, Gontero P. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Primary Nonsurgical Treatment: An Updated Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:251-257. [PMID: 36822924 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) has historically been associated with high morbidity, whilst recently published multicentre series suggested a trend towards improved outcomes. Hence, we performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria to investigate the oncological and functional results and morbidity of sRP. We included 20 retrospective articles comprising 4175 men. Robotic procedures were performed in 40% and nerve sparing in up to 36% of men. Postoperative continence was preserved in 40.4% of patients and erectile function in <16%. High-grade complications were described in 6.6% of patients (rectal injuries 0.9%). At final sRP pathology, surgical margins were positive in 26.1%, 32.8% had seminal vesicle invasion, and International Society of Urological Pathology grade was >3 in 26.6%. Ten-year metastasis-free survival ranged from 72% to 77% and 5-yr cancer-specific survival ranged from 86.6% to 97.7%. Salvage radical prostatectomy shows durable oncological control and morbidity improved over recent years, despite remaining significant compared to and higher than that of primary radical prostatectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) shows improving oncological control and morbidity over time. The complications associated with sRP and its functional results seem to be acceptable and are continuously improving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim Touijer
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Calleris G, Marra G, Benfant N, Rajwa P, Ahmed M, Abreu A, Cacciamani G, Ghoreifi A, Ribeiro L, Westhofen T, Tourinho-Barbosa R, Raskin Y, Veerman H, Albisinni S, Smith JA, Rouprêt M, Oderda M, Massari E, Persad R, Van Der Poel H, Joniau S, Sanchez-Salas R, Kretschmer A, Cathcart P, Gill I, Karnes RJ, Tilki D, Shariat SF, Touijer K, Gontero P. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following First-line Nonsurgical Treatment: Validation of the European Association of Urology Criteria in a Large, Multicenter, Contemporary Cohort. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00006-8. [PMID: 36682962 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is a potentially curative option for locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) but is associated with significant morbidity. Therefore, the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend restricting sRP to a favorable-prognosis group according to the EAU criteria, but these have been validated considering only biochemical recurrence (BCR). Our aim was to test these criteria in a large, multicenter, contemporary cohort. We retrospectively reviewed 1265 patients who underwent sRP at 14 referral centers (2000-2021), stratified by compliance with the EAU criteria. Our primary outcome was metastasis-free survival (MFS). We included 1030 men, of whom 221 (21.5%) fully met the EAU recommended criteria for sRP and 809 (78.5%) did not. The EAU-compliant group experienced more favorable pathological and functional outcomes (79% vs 63% wearing no pads at 1 yr; p < 0.001) and had significantly better MFS (90% vs 76% at 5 yr; p < 0.001), prostate-specific antigen-free survival (55% vs 38% at 5 yr; p < 0.001), and overall survival (89% vs 84% at 5 yr; p = 0.01). This was verified by Cox regression analysis for MFS (hazard ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.99; p = 0.01). We found that adherence to the EAU criteria is associated with a lower risk of BCR and, more importantly, of metastasis after surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at outcomes of surgical removal of the prostate for prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy or other nonsurgical treatments according to whether or not patients met the European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria for this surgery. We found that men who did not meet the criteria had a higher risk of metastasis and their benefit from surgery might be significantly less than for patients who do meet the EUA criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Calleris
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Nicole Benfant
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Mohamed Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andre Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Thilo Westhofen
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Yannic Raskin
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Veerman
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joseph A Smith
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Department of Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Emilia Massari
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology & The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karim Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marra G, Calleris G, Massari E, Vissio E, Molinaro L, Cassoni P, D'Agate D, Oderda M, Valerio M, Raskin Y, Joniau S, Papotti M, Gontero P. Topography of Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Single-centre Analysis of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Specimens and Implications for Focal Salvage Treatments. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 47:110-118. [PMID: 36601045 PMCID: PMC9806711 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences after nonsurgical first-line treatment are managed with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). When local treatment is indicated, salvage focal treatment (FT) may achieve outcomes similar to those after salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP), with lower morbidity. However, descriptions of the topography of PCa recurrence are scarce. Objective To describe the characteristics and topography of recurrent PCa at sRP. Design setting and participants We performed a review of the final pathology for consecutive men undergoing sRP at a single centre between 2007 and 2021. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Clinical and pathological outcomes and recurrence localisation (standardised map) were recorded. Suitability for salvage FT was evaluated using criteria defined a priori. Results and limitations We included 41 men who underwent sRP after whole-gland treatment (82.9% primary radiotherapy). Of these, 68.3% had grade group ≥3 and 46.3% had pT3 disease, including nine men (22%) with seminal vesicle involvement >1 cm. The pN+ rate was 29.3%. Surgical margins were positive in 39% (mostly at the apex, 21.9%). PCa was located at <3 mm from the apex in 68% of cases. The segment most frequently involved was the mid-gland (93%). The median prostate and index lesion (IL) volume was 31.4 cm3 (interquartile range [IQR] 23-37) and 2 cm3 (IQR 0.5-6), respectively. A solitary IL was present in 63.4% of cases, while 7.3% had whole-gland PCa involvement. Overall, 56% of the men (n = 23) were deemed suitable for salvage FT (although seven had pN+ disease). The sample size, single-centre retrospective design, and unavailability of magnetic resonance imaging data are the main limitations. Conclusions According to sRP pathology, radiorecurrent PCa is an aggressive disease, frequently showing extraprostatic extension, positive margins, and apical involvement. The majority of cases still harbour a solitary index lesion and a consistent proportion may be suitable for a gland-preserving strategy. Patient summary In this report we looked at the location of prostate cancer recurrence within the prostate gland after radiotherapy or ablation, in which energy (such as heat, cold, or laser energy) is used to kill cells. We found that although these recurrences are often high-grade locally advanced disease, around half of cases might be suitable for a gland-preserving salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Corso Bramante 88–90, 10100 Turin, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Emilia Massari
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Vissio
- Department of Pathology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Pathology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele D'Agate
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Yannick Raskin
- Department of Urology, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mauro Papotti
- Department of Pathology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Salvage Retzius-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of Complications, Functional Outcomes, and Oncologic Outcomes. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9733-9743. [PMID: 36547178 PMCID: PMC9777071 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
(Background) Radiation failure for localized prostate cancer is seen in 20-60% of patients who do not undergo extirpative surgery. Though potentially curative, salvage prostatectomy (SS) has not been frequently performed historically due to high rates of complications and postoperative incontinence. With the advent of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, these rates appear to be improved. Retzius-sparing approaches have additionally been shown to improve continence outcomes in the index setting, and may further improve continence outcomes in salvage cases while maintaining oncologic integrity. (Methods) We performed a literature review and qualitative analysis of published papers on salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SRS). Three studies met criteria and were included in analysis. (Results) There were more patients with Gleason Grade Group 1 disease after initial treatment in the SRS group vs. SS (22% vs. 8%). Patients most frequently underwent external beam radiation therapy in both groups (52% vs. 49%). 30-day complication rates were 10% and 26% for SRS and SS, respectively. Continence outcomes were significantly improved in SRS with 59% of continence (based on study criteria) compared to 38% in SS. Time to continence was similarly improved for SRS. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence were not significantly different between SRS and SS in any study. (Conclusions) SRS is a safe and feasible option for salvage treatment of localized prostate cancer and may improve postoperative continence outcomes. Positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates are similar to those reported in SS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Marquis A, Marra G, Calleris G, Oderda M, Montefusco G, D'Agate D, Sotelo R, Sooriakumaran P, Walz J, Gontero P. Nightmares in Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Primary Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Step by Step Tutorial. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 43:62-67. [PMID: 35942231 PMCID: PMC9356262 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy after primary radiotherapy (sRP) is considered a challenging procedure. We highlight the complications of sRP and detail critical surgical steps to help prevent them. A nonsystematic literature review in PubMed using the term “salvage radical prostatectomy” was performed on December 1, 2021. Salvage robot-assisted RP (sRARP) cases and imaging materials were used to create an educational video providing practical examples. Owing to radiation-induced changes in the prostate and surrounding tissues after radiotherapy, sRP is typically more challenging than primary RP. Among its critical steps are incision of the endopelvic fascia, bladder neck dissection with attempts at sparing the neck, development of posterior planes between the prostate and rectum, and dissection of the prostatic apex. Complication rates are significant, in particular for bladder neck contracture (0–16%) and anastomotic leakage (10–33%). Rectal injury is now rare (<2%) but still feared; careful adherence to surgical principles is required to avoid this complication. Functional outcomes are nonoptimal, with a high risk of urinary incontinence (severe incontinence in ∼25% of men). sRARP is a challenging urological procedure and should be performed by experienced surgeons. Thorough knowledge of the surgical anatomy and a meticulous technique for the most difficult surgical steps are crucial to minimise complications and to improve patient outcomes. Patient summary In patients with prostate cancer, removal of the prostate because of cancer recurrence after primary treatment with radiotherapy can be difficult because of radiation-induced tissue damage. This challenging procedure should be performed by experienced surgeons to minimise the risk of complications.
Collapse
|
16
|
Marra G, Shah TT, D’Agate D, Marquis A, Calleris G, Lunelli L, Filippini C, Oderda M, Gatti M, Valerio M, Sanchez-Salas R, Bossi A, Gomez-Rivas J, Conte F, Deandreis D, Cussenot O, Ricardi U, Gontero P. The SAFE Pilot Trial—SAlvage Focal Irreversible Electroporation—For Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Study Protocol. Front Surg 2022; 9:900528. [PMID: 35747441 PMCID: PMC9209638 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.900528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionCurrently, the majority of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences after non-surgical first-line treatment are managed with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is a curative alternative to ADT but yields significant morbidity. Preliminary evidence from focal salvage treatments shows similar oncological control but lower morbidity compared to sRP. Among available ablative focal energies, irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a treatment modality that proved promising, especially in treating apical lesions, where PCa most often recurs. Our aim is to test the safety of salvage IRE for recurrent PCa.MethodsWe performed a single-arm pilot feasibility study (IDEAL stage 2a): SAFE, SAlvage Focal irreversible Electroporation for recurrent localized PCa. Twenty patients with biopsy-proven PCa recurrence after primary non-surgical (radiation or ablation) treatment were included. All men will undergo mpMRI ± targeted biopsies, pre-operative PSMA-PET staging before inclusion and sIRE. Outcomes will be evaluated through internationally validated questionnaires and morbidity scales. All men will undergo a control biopsy at one year.ResultsPrimary objectives were the evaluation of the safety of sIRE (and patients’ quality of life) after treatment. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of functional outcomes, namely, continence and erectile function changes and evaluation of short-term oncological efficacy.ConclusionsSAFE is the second pilot study to evaluate sIRE and the first one performed according to the most recent diagnostic and staging imaging standards. sIRE may provide a curative option for recurrent PCa together with lower comorbidities compared to sRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
- Correspondence: Giancarlo Marra
| | - Taimur T. Shah
- Department of Urology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniele D’Agate
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Radiology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier-Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Juan Gomez-Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Conte
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Desiree Deandreis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Division of Radiotherapy and Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Introduction of salvage prostatectomy in Denmark: the initial experience. BMC Res Notes 2022; 15:185. [PMID: 35597969 PMCID: PMC9123700 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-06076-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To introduce salvage prostatectomy in Denmark. Prior to this, no national curative treatment for recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy existed in Denmark. This pilot study represent our initial experiences and the feasibility of performing salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for true local, high-risk recurrence after initial therapy with external beam radiation for high-risk prostate cancer. RESULTS Five patients underwent sRARP between April 2020 and July 2021. All patients were discharged within 48 h and no major complications were observed within 3 months. All patients had unmeasurable PSA (< 0.1 ng/ml) at follow-up 6 months after surgery. One patient with longer follow-up than 6 months experienced biochemical recurrence. At 3-months follow-up all patients reported considerable incontinence, at 6-month follow-up, pad usage decreased to 1 or 2 pads daily. Based on our initial results, the idea to introduce sRARP as a nationwide option remains and further patients will be included to establish the true role of sRARP in patients with recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PCa.
Collapse
|
18
|
Schuetz V, Reimold P, Goertz M, Hofer L, Dieffenbacher S, Nyarangi-Dix J, Duensing S, Hohenfellner M, Hatiboglu G. Evolution of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy from Open to Robotic and Further to Retzius Sparing Surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010202. [PMID: 35011942 PMCID: PMC8745561 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) has evolved from open to minimally invasive approaches. sRP can be offered to patients with local recurrence to improve biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free and overall survival. We evaluate oncological outcome and continence after retropubic (RRP), conventional (cRARP), and Retzius-sparing robotic (rsRARP) surgery. Materials/methods: A total of 53 patients undergoing sRP between 2010 and 2020 were included. Follow-up included oncological outcome and continence. Results: sRP was done as RRP (n = 25), cRARP (n = 7), or rsRARP (n = 21). Median blood loss was 900 mL, 500 mL, and 300 mL for RRP, cRARP, and rsRARP, respectively. At 12 months, 5 (20%), 0, and 4 (19%) patients were continent, 9 (36%), 3 (43%), and 7 (33%) had grade 1 incontinence, 5 (20%), 2 (29%), and 3 (14%) had grade 2 incontinence, and 3 (12%), 2 (29%), and 4 (19%) had grade 3 incontinence for RRP, cRARP, or rsRARP, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 52.6 months, 16 (64%), 4 (57%), and 3 (14%) developed BCR in the RRP-, cRARP-, and rsRARP-group, respectively. Conclusions: Over the years, sRP has shifted from open to laparoscopic/robotic surgery. RARP shows good oncological and functional outcome. rsRARP ensures direct vision on the rectum during preparation and can therefore increase safety and surgeon’s confidence, especially in the salvage setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Schuetz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence: (V.S.); (G.H.); Tel.: +49-6221-6110 (V.S. & G.H.)
| | - Philipp Reimold
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Magdalena Goertz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Luisa Hofer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Svenja Dieffenbacher
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Joanne Nyarangi-Dix
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
- Section of Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Gencay Hatiboglu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence: (V.S.); (G.H.); Tel.: +49-6221-6110 (V.S. & G.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sciarra A, Maggi M. Comment on: "Prognostic value of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio in patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation recurrent prostate cancer". Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:683-685. [PMID: 34847653 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04725-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dell'oglio P, Tappero S, Andras I, Palagonia E, Larcher A, Secco S, Mottrie A, Bocciardi AM, Suardi N, Galfano A. Comment on: "The surgical learning curve for salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon study". Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:680-682. [PMID: 34847652 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04721-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Dell'oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy - .,Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands - .,Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands -
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Erika Palagonia
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti", Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, URI-IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Secco
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy
| | - Alexander Mottrie
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Aldo M Bocciardi
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Büchser D, Medina R, Mayrata E, González A, Marban M, Achard V, Alongi F, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Couñago F. Salvage local treatment for localized radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a narrative review and future perspectives. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4207-4219. [PMID: 34448402 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although dose escalation protocols have improved biochemical control in prostate cancer radiotherapy, 10-45% of patients will experience disease recurrence. The prostate and seminal vesicles are the most frequent site of the first relapse. Traditionally, these patients have been managed with hormonal therapy, which is not curative. Recent improvements in diagnostic tests (e.g., multiparametric magnetic resonance and molecular imaging, including PET/CT scan with choline or Ga-PSMA) and new treatment techniques (e.g., stereotactic body radiation therapy or other minimally invasive alternatives like high-intensity focus ultrasound, cryoablation or high-dose-rate brachytherapy) offer new therapeutic strategies with the potential to cure some patients with limited adverse effects. In this narrative review, the authors present the most recent evidence to help identify the most suitable candidates for salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Büchser
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo 48903, Spain
| | - Rafael Medina
- Urology, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Sevilla 41013, Spain
| | - Esther Mayrata
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo 48903, Spain
| | - Alba González
- Radiation Oncology, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao 48013, Spain.,Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Marina Marban
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo 48903, Spain
| | - Vérane Achard
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar 37024, Italy
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo 48903, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Radiation Oncology, Quirón Salud University Hospital, Madrid 28223, Spain.,Radiation Oncology, La Luz Hospital, Madrid 28003, Spain.,Clinical Department, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28670, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tregunna R. Good oncological control with salvage surgery. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:190. [PMID: 33692497 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00452-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
23
|
Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radio-Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review of Oncologic, Histopathologic and Functional Outcomes and Predictors of Good Response. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:2881-2892. [PMID: 34436018 PMCID: PMC8395524 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28040252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
A valid treatment option for recurrence after definite radiotherapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer (PC) is salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). However, data on SRP are scarce, possibly resulting in an underutilization. A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, and Web of Science databases including studies published between January 1980 and April 2020. Overall, 23 English language articles including a total number of 2323 patients were selected according to PRISMA criteria. The overall median follow-up was 37.5 months (IQR 35.5–52.5). Biochemical-recurrence (BCR)-free probability ranged from 34% to 83% at five years, respectively, and from 31% to 37% at 10 years. Cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) ranged from 88.7% to 98% and 64% to 95% at five years and from 72% to 83% and 65% to 72% at 10 years, respectively. Positive surgical margins ranged from 14% to 45.8% and pathologic organ-confined disease was reported from 20% to 57%. The rate of pathologic > T2-disease ranged from 37% to 80% and pN1 disease differed between 0% to 78.4%. Pre-SRP PSA, pre-SRP Gleason Score (GS), pathologic stage after SRP, and pathologic lymph node involvement seemed to be the strongest prognostic factors for good outcomes. SRP provides accurate histopathological and functional outcomes, as well as durable cancer control. Careful patient counseling in a shared decision-making process is recommended.
Collapse
|