Survival trends in chemotherapy exposed metastatic bladder cancer patients and chemotherapy effect across different age, sex, and race/ethnicity

The sex gap in bladder cancer survival - a missing link in bladder cancer care?

The differences in bladder cancer outcomes between the sexes has again been highlighted. Uncommon among cancers, bladder cancer outcomes are notably worse for women than for men. Furthermore, bladder cancer is three to four times more common among men than among women. Factors that might explain these sex differences include understanding the importance of haematuria as a symptom of bladder cancer by both clinicians and patients, the resultant delays in diagnosis and referral of women with haematuria, and health-care access. Notably, these factors seem to have geographical variation and are not consistent across all health-care systems. Likewise, data relating to sex-specific treatment responses for patients with non-muscle-invasive or muscle-invasive bladder cancer are inconsistent. The influence of differences in the microbiome, bladder wall thickness and urine dwell times remain to be elucidated. The interplay of hormone signalling, gene expression, immunology and the tumour microenvironment remains complex but probably underpins the sexual dimorphism in disease incidence and stage and histology at presentation. The contribution of these biological phenomena to sex-specific outcome differences is probable, albeit potentially treatment-specific, and further understanding is required. Notwithstanding these aspects, we identify opportunities to harness biological differences to improve treatment outcomes, as well as areas of fundamental and translational research to pursue. At the level of policy and health-care delivery, improvements can be made across the domains of patient awareness, clinician education, referral pathways and guideline-based care. Together, we aim to highlight opportunities to close the sex gap in bladder cancer outcomes.

Adenocarcinoma of the Bladder: Assessment of Survival Advantage Associated With Radical Cystectomy and Comparison With Urothelial Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between radical cystectomy (RC) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the bladder (ACB). Moreover, to directly compare the survival advantage of RC between ACB vs. urothelial bladder cancer (UBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Non-metastatic muscle-invasive ACB and UBC patients were identified within Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER 2000-2018). All analyses were stratified between RC vs. no-RC, in either organ-confined (OC: T2N0M0) or non-organ-confined (NOC: T3-4N0M0 or TanyN1-3M0) stages. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, competing risks regression (CRR) analyses, and 3 months' landmark analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,005 ACB and 47,741 UBC patients were identified, of whom 475 (47%) and 19,499 (41%) were treated with RC, respectively. After PSM, comparison between RC vs. no-RC applied to 127 vs. 127 OC-ACB, 7,611 vs. 7,611 OC-UBC, 143 vs. 143 NOC-ACB, and 4,664 vs. 4,664 NOC-UBC patients. 36-month CSM rates in RC vs. no-RC patients were 14 vs. 44% in OC-ACB, 18 vs. 39% in OC-UBC, 49 vs. 66% in NOC-ACB, and 44 vs. 56% in NOC-UBC patients. In CRR analyses, the effect of RC on CSM yielded a hazard ratio of 0.37 in OC-ACB, of 0.45 in OC-UBC, of 0.65 in NOC-ACB and of 0.68 in NOC-UBC patients (all P values<0.001). Landmark analyses virtually perfectly replicated the results.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACB, regardless of stage, RC is associated with lower CSM. The magnitude of this survival advantage was greater in ACB than in UBC, even after control for immortal time bias.

The Effect of Sex on Disease Stage and Survival after Radical Cystectomy in Non-Urothelial Variant-Histology Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Female sex in patients treated by radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with more advanced stage and worse survival. However, studies supporting these findings mostly or exclusively relied on urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) and did not address non-urothelial variant-histology bladder cancer (VH BCa). We hypothesized that female sex is associated with a more advanced stage and worse survival in VH BCa, similarly to that of UCUB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Within the SEER database (2004-2016), we identified patients aged ≥18 years, with histologically confirmed VH BCa, and treated with comprehensive RC. Logistic regression addressing the non-organ-confined (NOC) stage, as well as cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression addressing CSM for females vs. males, were fitted. All analyses were repeated in stage-specific and VH-specific subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 1623 VH BCa patients treated with RC were identified. Of those, 38% were female. Adenocarcinoma (n = 331, 33%), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 304, 18%), and other VH (n = 317, 37%) were less frequent in females but not squamous cell carcinoma (n = 671, 51%). Across all VH subgroups, female patients had higher NOC rates than males did (68 vs. 58%, p < 0.001), and female sex was an independent predictor of NOC VH BCa (OR = 1.55, p = 0.0001). Overall, five-year cancer-specific mortality (CSM) were 43% for females vs. 34% for males (HR = 1.25, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In VH BC patients treated with comprehensive RC, female sex is associated with a more advanced stage. Independently of stage, female sex also predisposes to higher CSM.

Radical cystectomy in non-metastatic sarcomatoid bladder cancer: A direct comparison vs urothelial bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

The effect of radical cystectomy (RC) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) is unclear in non-metastatic sarcomatoid bladder cancer (SBC) patients. We aimed to test the benefit of RC in SBC, and to perform a direct comparison vs urothelial bladder cancer (UCB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER 2001-2018) all non-metastatic SBC and UBC patients were identified. Endpoint of interest was CSM. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, competing risks regression (CRR) analyses, three-months landmark analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed. All results were stratified according to organ-confined (OC: T₂N₀M₀) vs non-organ-confined (NOC: T_3-4N₀M₀ or T_anyN_1-3M₀) stages.

RESULTS

Of 554 SBC patients, 49 vs 51% harbored OC vs NOC stages. Of 47,741 UBC patients, 62 vs 38% harbored OC vs NOC stages. RC rates were 33 vs 67% in OC vs NOC-SBC patients, and 40 vs 60% in OC vs NOC-UBC patients. After 1:1 PSM, comparison between RC vs no-RC was performed in OC-SBC (67 patients per group), OC-UBC (7611 patients per group), NOC-SBC (63 patients per group), and NOC-UBC patients (4644 patients per group). CRR hazard ratios associated with RC vs no-RC were 0.37 (p < 0.001) in OC-SBC vs 0.45 (p < 0.001) in OC-UBC, and 0.56 (p = 0.01) in NOC-SBC vs 0.68 (p < 0.001) in NOC-UBC. These results were replicated in sensitivity and landmark analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effect of RC vs no-RC is stronger in SBC than UBC patients, regardless of OC vs NOC stages.

Rates of metastatic prostate cancer in newly diagnosed patients: Numbers needed to image according to risk level

BACKGROUND

The numbers needed to image to identify pelvic lymph node and/or distant metastases in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients according to risk level are unknown.

METHODS

Relying on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2010-2016), we tabulated rates and proportions of patients with (a) lymph node or (b) distant metastases according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk level and calculated the number needed to image (NNI) for both endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 145,939 newly diagnosed PCa patients assessable for analyses of pelvic lymph node metastases (cN1), 4559 (3.1%) harbored cN1 stage: 13 (0.02%), 18 (0.08%), 63 (0.3%), 512 (2.8%), and 3954 (14.9%) in low, intermediate favorable, intermediate unfavorable, high, and very high-risk levels. These resulted in NNI of 4619, 1182, 319, 35, and 7, respectively. Of 181,109 newly diagnosed PCa patients assessable for analyses of distant metastases (M1_a-c ), 8920 (4.9%) harbored M1_a-c stage: 50 (0.07%), 45 (0.1%), 161 (0.5%), 1290 (5.1%), and 7374 (22.0%) in low, intermediate favorable, intermediate unfavorable, high, and very high-risk. These resulted in NNI of 1347, 602, 174, 20, and 5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations perfectly validated the NCCN recommendations for imaging in newly diagnosed high and very high-risk PCa patients. However, in unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa patients, in whom bone and soft tissue imaging is recommended, the NNI might be somewhat elevated to support routine imaging in clinical practice.