1
|
Saengthongpithak W, Suk-Ouichai C, Taweemonkongsap T, Thiravit S, Chotikawanich E, Jitpraphai S, Woranisarakul V, Mahamongkol K, Hansomwong T. CT volumetric analysis: association of renal parenchyma and GFR alteration in nephrectomy patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:2549-2557. [PMID: 39641781 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04693-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 11/02/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wasin Saengthongpithak
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Chalairat Suk-Ouichai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shanigarn Thiravit
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ekkarin Chotikawanich
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Siros Jitpraphai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Varat Woranisarakul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Katunyou Mahamongkol
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thitipat Hansomwong
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saitta C, Autorino R, Capitanio U, Lughezzani G, Meagher MF, Yim K, Nguyen MV, Mantovani M, Guer M, Amparore D, Piramide F, Hakimi K, Patil D, Tanaka H, Fukuda S, Kobayashi M, Chen W, Pandolfo SD, Cortes J, Puri D, Yuen K, Lazzeri M, Fasulo V, Larcher A, Paciotti M, Garofano G, Porpiglia F, Montorsi F, Fujii Y, Master V, Buffi NM, Derweesh IH. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in pT3aN0M0 Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102343. [PMID: 40286515 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2025] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in pT3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of surgically treated pT3aN0M0 RCC patients. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality/overall survival (ACM/OS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific mortality/ cancer-specific survival (CSM/CSS), recurrence/progression free survival (PFS) and new onset de novo eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-S3b). A propensity score matched model in a 1:1 ratio was conducted, within a caliper width of 0.01. Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) and Cox multivariable analysis (MVA) were fitted to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors. RESULTS After PSM 359 were analyzed (PN = 179 vs. RN = 180); median follow up of 38.7 (IQR 16.28-64) months. MVA for ACM revealed, high grade (HR 2.05, P = .019), and CKD-S3b at last follow up (HR 2.13, P = .018) as independent risk factors, while RN versus PN (P = .41) was not. MVA for CSM and recurrence revealed that RN versus PN was not an independent risk factor for CSM (P = .088) and recurrence (P = .277). MVA for CKD-S3b revealed RN versus PN (HR 1.67 P = .025) as associated with increased risk of CKD-S3b. KMA comparing PN versus RN revealed 5-year OS of 87.4% versus 82% (P = .26); 5-year CSS of 95.6% versus 90.3% (P = .15); 5-year PFS of 83.5% versus 77% (P = .38); 5-year CKD-S3b free survival of 80.8% versus 65.5% (P = .016). CONCLUSION PN exhibited oncological equipoise while reducing risk of development of eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. PN may be considered in T3a RCC when prioritization of functional preservation is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Saitta
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Capitanio
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute (URI), Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Kendrick Yim
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Mimi V Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Matilde Mantovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Melis Guer
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Kevin Hakimi
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Hajime Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shohei Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Julian Cortes
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Kit Yuen
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute (URI), Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Garofano
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute (URI), Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Viraj Master
- Department of Urology, Emory Medical Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nicolò M Buffi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saitta C, Garofano G, Afari JA, Tanaka H, Patil D, Yuen KL, Wang L, Cortes J, Meagher MF, Puri D, Cerrato C, Nguyen MV, Hakimi K, Kobayashi M, Fukuda S, Paciotti M, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Buffi NM, Fujii Y, Master V, Derweesh IH. NODESAFE Nomogram: A Novel Score System to Predict Lymph Node Involvement at the Time of Nephrectomy or Nodal Recurrence in Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102232. [PMID: 39481317 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to develop a preoperative nomogram called NODESAFE (NODE SAFEty) to predict nodal involvement (NI) at time of surgery or subsequent follow up in localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as the role of lymphadenectomy in localized RCC remains controversial. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of RCC patients who underwent primary surgical resection. Patients with clinical metastasis at presentation were excluded. NI was defined as presence of histological RCC with lymphadenectomy at time of surgery, or subsequent development histologically proven NI. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and testing subsets to facilitate model evaluation which was constructed through a stepwise multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model. Accuracy was tested with receiver operator characteristic estimated area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Total 3308 patients (2221 [67.1%] male) met inclusion criteria. During follow-up 25 patients (0.76 %) experienced nodal recurrence, and 22/25 were preoperatively classified as cN0. In our cohort, 112 (3.4%) patients had clinical lymphadenopathy preoperatively (cN1), and 34/112 were pN1. The following covariates were found to be statically significant on a MLR model: hypertension (Odds ratio [OR] 3.35, < .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5 (OR 1.93 P = .025), tumor size ≥ 6 cm (OR 2.63, P = .001), tumor necrosis at CT scan (OR 1.83, P = .036), cN1 (OR 5.59, P < .001) and CRP ≥ 8.5 mg/L (1.96, P = .018). Testing the prediction performance of the model in the validation set AUC of the model was 0.89. NODESAFE demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.9%, specificity of 86.1% and 99.1% negative predictive values using a 4% threshold probability. CONCLUSION Combining clinical features, serum biomarkers and radiographic findings, we developed a model capable of predicting NI with high degree of accuracy. NODESAFE may refine clinical decision making with respect to the performance of lymphadenectomy at the time of surgery, postsurgical surveillance, and spur consideration for adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Saitta
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Garofano
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Jonathan A Afari
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | - Kit L Yuen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Luke Wang
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Julian Cortes
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Mimi V Nguyen
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Kevin Hakimi
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Nicolò M Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | | - Viraj Master
- Department of Urology, Emory Medical Center, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saitta C, Paciotti M, Lughezzani G, Garofano G, Meagher MF, Yuen KL, Fasulo V, Contieri R, Avolio PP, Piccolini A, Arena P, Mantovani M, Beatrici E, Calatroni M, Reggiani F, Hurle RF, Lazzeri M, Saita A, Casale P, Derweesh IH, Buffi NM. Impact of Mayo Adhesive Probability score and BMI on renal functional decline after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:942-949. [PMID: 39416753 PMCID: PMC11479805 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and body mass index (BMI) on renal function decline after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Methods We queried our prospective database for patients who underwent RAPN between January 2018 and December 2023. Outcomes were development of de novo CKD-S3 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression identified predictors for CKD-S3. Kaplan-Meier Analyses was fitted for survival assessment. Finally, multivariable linear regression was utilized to identify predictors of delta eGFR at last follow-up (preoperative eGFR-last eGFR). Results Two-hundred fifty-eight patients were analysed (obese n = 49 [19%]; MAP score 0-2 = 135 [52.33%]; MAP score 3-5 = 123 [47.6%]) with a median follow-up of 33 (IQR 20-42) months. MVA revealed, high MAP score (HR 2.29, p = 0.019), increasing RENAL score (HR 1.26, p = 0.009), increasing age (HR 1.04, p = 0.003), obesity (HR 2.38, p = 0.006) and diabetes mellitus (HR 2.38, p = 0.005) as associated with increased risk of development of CKD-S3, while trifecta achievement was not (p = 0.63). Comparing low MAP score versus high MAP score 4-year CKD-S3 free survival was 87.8% versus 56.1% (p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression showed that high MAP score (coefficient 6.64, p = 0.001) and BMI (coefficient 0.51, p = 0.011) were significantly associated with increased delta eGFR at last follow up. Conclusions MAP score and increasing BMI are predictor for long term renal functional detrimental. These insights may call consideration for closer follow-up or greater medical scrutiny prior surgery in obese patients and with elevated MAP score. Further investigations are requisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Saitta
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego Health SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Giuseppe Garofano
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | | | - Kit L. Yuen
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego Health SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Andrea Piccolini
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Paola Arena
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | | | - Edoardo Beatrici
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| | - Marta Calatroni
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
- Nephrology and Dialysis DivisionIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Francesco Reggiani
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
- Nephrology and Dialysis DivisionIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Rodolfo F. Hurle
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Alberto Saita
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
| | | | - Nicolò M. Buffi
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzanoItaly
- Biomedical ScienceHumanitas UniversityPieve EmanueleItaly
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prata F, Basile S, Tedesco F, Ragusa A, Pira M, Iannuzzi A, Fantozzi M, Civitella A, Scarpa RM, Papalia R. Skill Transfer from Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy to the Hugo™ RAS System: A Novel Proficiency Score to Assess Surgical Quality during the Learning Curve. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2226. [PMID: 38673499 PMCID: PMC11050920 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The absence of validated tools to assess the skill transfer from laparoscopy to robotic surgery remains an unsolved issue in the context of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We aimed to describe and validate a novel proficiency score to critically evaluate the surgical quality of RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Methods: Between October 2022 and September 2023, 27 consecutive patients underwent off-clamp RAPN for localized renal tumors at our institution. To analyze the learning curve (LC), the cohort was chronologically divided into two phases of 6 months each. Proficiency was defined as the achievement of trifecta while maintaining a comparable intraoperative time in the interquartile range of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed by the same surgeon. A logistic binary regression model was built to identify predictors of proficiency achievement. Results: A proficiency score was achieved in 14 patients (74.1%). At univariable analysis, number of consecutive procedures > 12 (OR 13.7; 95%CI 2.05-21.1, p = 0.007), pathological tumor size (OR 0.92; 95%CI 0.89-0.99, p = 0.04) and essential blood hypertension (OR 0.16; 95%CI 0.03-0.82, p = 0.02) were found to be predictors of proficiency score. At multivariable analysis, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, number of consecutive procedures > 12 (OR 8.1; 95%CI 1.44-14.6, p = 0.03) was the only independent predictor of proficiency score achievement. Conclusions: Our results showed that the skills of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon are transferrable to the novel Hugo™ RAS System in the context of nephron-sparing surgery. Improved surgical quality may be expected after completing the first 12 consecutive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Prata
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.B.); (F.T.); (A.R.); (M.P.); (A.I.); (M.F.); (A.C.); (R.M.S.); (R.P.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aveta A, Iossa V, Spena G, Conforti P, Pagano G, Dinacci F, Verze P, Manfredi C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Spirito L, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Fiorenza A, Russo P, Crocerossa F, Lucarelli G, Perdonà S, Sanseverino R, Siracusano S, Cilio S, Pandolfo SD. Ablative Treatments for Small Renal Masses and Management of Recurrences: A Comprehensive Review. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:450. [PMID: 38672721 PMCID: PMC11050889 DOI: 10.3390/life14040450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review focuses on ablative techniques for small renal masses (SRMs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), and discusses recurrence management. Through an extensive literature review, we outline the procedures, outcomes, and follow-up strategies associated with each ablative method. The review provides a detailed examination of these techniques-RFA, CA, MWA, and IRE-elucidating their respective outcomes. Recurrence rates vary among them, with RFA and CA showing comparable rates, MWA demonstrating favorable short-term results, and IRE exhibiting promise in experimental stages. For managing recurrences, various strategies are considered, including active surveillance, re-ablation, or salvage surgery. Surveillance is preferred post-RFA and post-CA, due to slow SRM growth, while re-ablation, particularly with RFA and CA, is deemed feasible without additional complications. Salvage surgery emerges as a viable option for larger or resistant tumors. While ablative techniques offer short-term results comparable to surgery, further research is essential to understand their long-term effects fully. Decisions concerning recurrence management should consider individual and tumor-specific factors. Imaging, notably contrast-enhanced ultrasounds, plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment success, emphasizing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes. The lack of randomized trials highlights the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
| | - Vincenzo Iossa
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Spena
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Paolo Conforti
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Giovanni Pagano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Fabrizio Dinacci
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.M.); (L.S.)
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.M.); (L.S.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Alessandra Fiorenza
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Pierluigi Russo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Roberto Sanseverino
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
| | | | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pandolfo SD, Wu Z, Campi R, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Mari A, Verze P, Manfredi C, Franco A, Ditonno F, Cerrato C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Contieri R, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Lucarelli G, Cilio S, Perdonà S, Siracusano S, Autorino R, Aveta A. Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:693. [PMID: 38398084 PMCID: PMC10886610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67010 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy;
| | - Andrea Mari
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Urology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, IRCCS—European Institute of Oncology, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy;
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | | | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang G, Wang B, Liu H, Jia G, Tao B, Zhang H, Wang C. How many cases are required to achieving early proficiency in purely off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? Front Surg 2024; 10:1309522. [PMID: 38234451 PMCID: PMC10792019 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1309522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (Offc-RAPN) is a technically challenging procedure that can effectively avoid renal ischemia owing to the absence of hilar vessel preparation and clamping. However, data on the learning curve (LC) for this technique are limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the LC of Offc-RAPN and compare the perioperative outcomes between different learning phases. Methods This retrospective study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent purely Offc-RAPN between January 2022 and April 2023. Multidimensional cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis method was used to assess LC. Spearman's correlation and LOWESS analysis were performed to analyze the continuous variables of perioperative outcomes. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2-test, t-test and U-test. Results CUSUM analysis identified two LC phases: phase I (the first 24 cases) and phase II (the subsequent 26 cases). Phase II showed significant reductions in mean operative time (133.5 vs. 115.31 min; p = 0.04), mean console time (103.21 vs. 81.27 min; p = 0.01), and mean postoperative length of stay (5.33 vs. 4.30 days; p = 0.04) compared to phase I. However, no significant differences were observed in other perioperative outcomes or baseline characteristics between the two LC phases. Conclusions Offc-RAPN performed by a surgeon with experience in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries achieved early proficiency in 24 cases. Moreover, Offc-RAPN alone is safe and feasible even in the initial phase of the LC for an experienced surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Chunyang Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|