Efficacy of various Marek's disease vaccines protocols for prevention of Marek's disease virus-induced immunosuppression

Optimizing protocols for monitoring in vivo replication of a novel chimeric Marek's disease vaccine with an insertion of the long terminal repeat of reticuloendotheliosis virus in the CVI988 strain genome (CVI-LTR)

Monitoring Marek's disease (MD) vaccination is routinely done by evaluating the load of MD vaccine in the feather pulp (FP) between 7 and 10 days of age. However, attempts in our laboratory to detect a novel CVI-LTR vaccine in the FP samples from commercial flocks failed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the most suitable tissue and age to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination. We used two different commercial CVI988 vaccines as controls. One hundred and sixty 1-day-old commercial brown layers were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR, CVI988-A, CVI988-B or remained unvaccinated. Samples of the spleen, thymus, and bursa were collected at 3, 4, 5, and 6 days of age and samples of FP were collected at 7 and 21 days for DNA isolation. Our results showed that CVI-LTR replicated earlier than CVI988 vaccines in the lymphoid organs but was not detected in the FP at either 7 or at 21 days of age. We also confirmed that either the spleen or thymus collected at 4-6 days was a suitable sample to monitor CVI-LTR vaccination in commercial flocks. Finally, we evaluated the load of oncogenic MDV DNA in five commercial flocks that were vaccinated with either CVI-LTR + rHVT or CVI988-A + rHVT. The load of oncogenic MDV DNA was evaluated at 21 days in the FP in 20 chickens per group. Our results demonstrated that CVI-LTR was more successful in reducing oncogenic MDV DNA at 21 days of age than the CVI988-A strain.RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTSCVI-LTR replicates in the thymus and spleen earlier than CVI988.CVI-LTR replicates in lymphoid organs but it cannot be detected in feather pulp.CVI-LTR reduced the load of oncogenic MDV DNA more efficiently than CVI988.

Role of T Cells in Vaccine-Mediated Immunity against Marek’s Disease

Marek’s disease virus (MDV), a highly cell-associated oncogenic α-herpesvirus, is the etiological agent of T cell lymphomas and neuropathic disease in chickens known as Marek’s disease (MD). Clinical signs of MD include neurological disorders, immunosuppression, and lymphoproliferative lymphomas in viscera, peripheral nerves, and skin. Although vaccination has greatly reduced the economic losses from MD, the molecular mechanism of vaccine-induced protection is largely unknown. To shed light on the possible role of T cells in immunity induced by vaccination, we vaccinated birds after the depletion of circulating T cells through the IP/IV injection of anti-chicken CD4 and CD8 monoclonal antibodies, and challenged them post-vaccination after the recovery of T cell populations post-treatment. There were no clinical signs or tumor development in vaccinated/challenged birds with depleted CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. The vaccinated birds with a combined depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, however, were severely emaciated, with atrophied spleens and bursas. These birds were also tumor-free at termination, with no virus particles detected in the collected tissues. Our data indicated that CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes did not play a critical role in vaccine-mediated protection against MDV-induced tumor development.

Characterization of Md5-BAC-REV-LTR virus as Marek's disease vaccine in commercial meat-type chickens: protection and immunosuppression

Md5-BAC-REV-LTR is a recombinant Marek's disease virus (MDV), with an insertion of the long terminal repeat (LTR) of reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) into the genome of the highly virulent MDV strain rMd5. It has been shown that Md5-BAC-REV-LTR does not induce tumours and confers high protection against challenge with MDV in 15 × 7 chickens. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the protection and safety (in terms of oncogenicity and immunosuppression) of Md5-BAC-REV-LTR in commercial meat-type chickens bearing maternal antibodies against MDV. Our results show that sub-cutaneous administration of Md5-BAC-REV-LTR at 1 day of age conferred high protection (protection index PI = 84.2) against an early challenge (1 day) by contact exposure to shedder birds infected with the vv+ MDV 648A strain. In such stringent challenge conditions, Md5-BAC-REV-LTR was more protective than a commercial CVI988 (PI = 12.4) and similar to the experimental vaccine Md5-BACΔmeq (PI = 92.4). Furthermore, Md5-BAC-REV-LTR did not induce either tumours or immunosuppression in this study. Immunosuppression was evaluated by the relative lymphoid organ weights and also by the ability of the vaccine to induce late-MDV-induced immunosuppression associated with reactivation of the virus. This study shows that Md5-BAC-REV-LTR has the potential to be used as a MD vaccine and is highly protective against early challenge with vv+ MDV. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTSMd5-BAC-REV-LTR is highly protective against early challenge with vv+ MDV in commercial meat-type chickens.Md5-BAC-REV-LTR does not cause early immunosuppression.Md5-BAC-REV-LTR does not cause late immunosuppression.Unlike other serotype 1 vaccines, Md5-BAC-REV-LTR is not detected in feather pulp at 7 days post vaccination.

Highly virulent Marek's disease virus strains affect T lymphocyte function and viability of splenocytes in commercial meat-type chickens

In previous studies, we have demonstrated that very virulent plus Marek's disease viruses (vv+MDV) are highly immunosuppressive in commercial meat-type chickens. The specific objectives of this work were to evaluate if vv+MDV immunosuppression (MDV-IS) is induced by reduction of lymphocyte responsiveness and/or viability. Three experiments were conducted to (i) compare vv+MDV 686 with a partially attenuated 686-BAC; (ii) compare vv+MDV strains (648A and 686) with vMDV (GA) and vvMDV (Md5); and (iii) compare chickens vaccinated with Md5-BACΔMEQ and with CVI988 + HVT. In each experiment, spleens were collected at 28-30 days post infection and lymphocytes were isolated and investigated in three ways: their proliferative response to Concanavalin A (ConA) was analysed by MTT proliferation assay; cell death, and expression of CD45 and MHC-I was studied by flow cytometry; and MHC-IA and β-2 microglobulin (B2M) expression was evaluated by real time RT-PCR. Splenocytes of chickens inoculated with vv+MDV were severely impaired to proliferate when exposed to ConA. Furthermore, vv+MDV induced severe splenocyte death that did not occur after infection with v or vvMDV strains. Vaccination with CVI988 + HVT, and at less level with Md5-BACΔMEQ reduced these negative effects. This is in contrast to our previous results in which Md5-BACΔMEQ but not CVI988 + HVT protected against MDV-IS suggesting that although cell death and decrease lymphocyte function seem to be related to MDV virulence and certainly will be associated with immunosuppression, they might not fully explain the previously reported MDV-IS. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS vv+MDV induces extensive death in splenocytes in meat-type chickens 28-30 dpi. vv+MDV impairs lymphocyte function in meat-type chickens 28-30 dpi. Vaccination protects against splenocyte death and reduced lymphocyte function. Cell lysis and reduced lymphocyte function do not fully explain MDV-IS.

Virus-Induced Immunosuppression in Chickens

A healthy immune system is a cornerstone for poultry production. Any factor diminishing the immune responses will affect production parameters and increase cost. There are numerous factors, infectious and noninfectious, causing immunosuppression (IS) in chickens. This paper reviews the three viral diseases that most commonly induce IS or subclinical IS in chickens: Marek's disease virus (MDV), chicken infectious anemia virus (CIAV), and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), as well as the interactions among them. MDV-induced IS (MDV-IS) affects both humoral and cellular immune responses. It is very complex, poorly understood, and in many cases underdiagnosed. Vaccination protects against some but not all aspects of MDV-IS. CIAV induces apoptosis of the hemocytoblasts resulting in anemia, hemorrhages, and increased susceptibility to bacterial infections. It also causes apoptosis of thymocytes and dividing T lymphocytes, affecting T helper functions, which are essential for antibody production and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) functions. Control of CIAV is based on vaccination of breeders and maternal antibodies (MAbs). However, subclinical IS can occur after MAbs wane. IBDV infection affects the innate immune responses during virus replication and humoral immune responses as a consequence of the destruction of B-cell populations. Vaccines with various levels of attenuation are used to control IBDV. Interactions with MAbs and residual virulence of the vaccines need to be considered when designing vaccination plans. The interaction between IBDV, CIAV, and MDV is critical although underestimated in many cases. A proper control of IBDV is a must to have proper humoral immune responses needed to control CIAV. Equally, long-term control of MDV is not possible if chickens are coinfected with CIAV, as CIAV jeopardizes CTL functions critical for MDV control.

Evaluation of factors influencing the development of late Marek's disease virus-induced immunosuppression: virus pathotype and host sex

Marek's disease virus (MDV) is a herpesvirus that induces lymphoma and immunosuppression in chickens. MDV-induced immunosuppression (MDV-IS) is complex and can be divided into two phases: early-MDV-IS associated with cytolytic infection in the lymphoid organs in chickens lacking maternal antibodies against MDV (MAbs) and late-MDV-IS that appears later in the pathogenesis and occurs even in chickens bearing MAbs. We have recently developed a model to reproduce late-MDV-IS under laboratory conditions. This model evaluates late-MDV-IS indirectly by assessing the effect of MDV infection on the efficacy of infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) vaccines against challenge with ILT virus. In the present study, we have used this model to investigate the role of two factors (MDV pathotype and host sex) on the development of late-MDV-IS. Five MDV strains representing three different pathotypes: virulent (vMDV; 617A, GA), very virulent (vvMDV; Md5), and very virulent plus (vv+MDV; 648A, 686), were evaluated. Only vv+ strains were able to induce late-MDV-IS. An immunosuppression rank (IS-rank) was established based on the ability of MDV to reduce the efficacy of chicken embryo origin vaccine (values go from 0 to 100, with 100 being the highest immunosuppressive ability). The IS-rank of the evaluated MDV strains ranged from 5.97 (GA) to 20.8 (617A) in the vMDV strains, 5.97 to 16.24 in the vvMDV strain Md5, and 39.08 to 68.2 in the vv+ strains 648A and 686. In this study both male and female chickens were equally susceptible to MDV-IS by vv+MDV 686. Our findings suggest that late-MDV-IS is a unique feature of vv+ strains.

Early Immune Responses to Marek's Disease Vaccines

Marek's disease virus (MDV), a highly cell-associated lymphotropic α-herpesvirus, is the causative agent of Marek's disease (MD) in domestic chickens. MDV replicates in chicken cells and establishes a latent infection within CD4⁺ T cells. Although MD vaccines have been in use for several decades, the exact mechanism of vaccine-induced protection is unclear. It is believed that the innate immune system plays a role in vaccine-induced immunity against pathogenic strains of MDV. To shed light on the possible function of the innate immunity in vaccine-mediated protection, we investigated the effect of vaccination, Rispens/CVI988, on the activation of cellular components of the innate immune system by analyzing the expression pattern of select immune-related genes in the cecal tonsils (CT) and duodenum of two MD-susceptible and MD-resistant chicken lines at 3, 5, and 10 days postvaccination (dpv). The differential expression patterns of the tested genes within the CT and duodenum of vaccinated birds revealed the activation of the innate immune system in both the susceptible and resistant lines. Stronger innate immune response was induced within the CT of the vaccinated birds of the susceptible line at 5 dpv. Upregulation of some of the tested genes at 10 dpv was likely due to the activation and response of the adaptive immune system to vaccination. Immunohistochemical analysis showed no increase in the number of CD3⁺ T cells in the CT and duodenum of the vaccinated birds of either line at 5 dpv. There was, however, an increase in the macrophage populations within the duodenum of the vaccinated birds of both the susceptible and resistant lines at 5 dpv. The vaccine strain antigen was detected in the CT and duodenum of the susceptible line, but not the resistant line at 5 dpv.