1
|
Antoniou T, McCormack D, Fell DB, Kwong JC, Gomes T. Impact of national recommendations for routine pertussis vaccination during pregnancy on infant pertussis in Ontario, Canada: a population-based time-series study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:627. [PMID: 37653488 PMCID: PMC10469528 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05938-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In February 2018, Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommended antenatal tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization in every pregnancy regardless of previous Tdap immunization history. We examined the impact of the NACI recommendation on rates of infant pertussis in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We conducted a population-based time-series study of all live births in Ontario between August 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of the NACI recommendation on monthly rates of pertussis among infants ≤ 3 months of age. RESULTS We observed 675 incident cases of pertussis among 1,368,024 infants 3 months of age or less between August 2011 and February 2020. The average monthly percent change in infant pertussis during the period up to and including publication of the NACI guidance and the period following publication were 0.0% (95% CI: -0.4-0.3%) and - 0.8% (95% CI -2.3% to -0.1%), respectively. Following interventional ARIMA modelling, publication of the NACI guidance was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the monthly pertussis incidence trend (-0.67 cases per 100,000 infants; p = 0.73). CONCLUSION Publication of national recommendations for antenatal Tdap immunization in every pregnancy did not significantly reduce infant pertussis rates. This may reflect the persistently low rate of antenatal vaccination following publication of the recommendations. Expanding the scope of practice of allied health care providers to include antenatal Tdap immunization and patient education regarding antenatal pertussis immunization should be considered to further optimize uptake of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Antoniou
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Deshayne B Fell
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Young A, Charania NA, Gauld N, Norris P, Turner N, Willing E. Informing women about maternal vaccination in Aotearoa New Zealand: Is it effective? Midwifery 2023; 120:103636. [PMID: 36827756 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Young
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
| | - Nadia A Charania
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Studies, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, Auckland 0627, New Zealand
| | - Natalie Gauld
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - Pauline Norris
- Va'a o Tautai-Centre for Pacific Health, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
| | - Nikki Turner
- Immunisation Advisory Centre, University of Auckland, Grafton Campus, Building 507, Level 3, 22-30 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
| | - Esther Willing
- Kōhatu-Centre for Hauora Māori, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maertens K, Orije MRP, Huoi C, Boisnard F, Lyabis O. Immunogenicity of a liquid hexavalent DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine after primary and booster vaccination of term and preterm infants born to women vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy. Vaccine 2023; 41:795-804. [PMID: 36528443 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination during pregnancy with tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (aP) (Tdap) antigens is important for early protection of newborn infants against pertussis, particularly for preterm infants. This study evaluated the effect of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy on the immunogenicity of a diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), aP, inactivated poliovirus (IPV), hepatitis B (HB), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (PRP ∼ T) vaccine in term and preterm populations. METHODS A prospective, observational study (NCT02511327) recruited women and their infants based on delivery (term or preterm) and vaccination status (vaccinated with a Tdap vaccine [Boostrix™, GlaxoSmithKline] during pregnancy or not vaccinated in the last 5 years). All infants received licensed DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T (Hexyon™, Sanofi) (8, 12, 16 week primary series and booster at 13 months of age [preterm infants] or 15 months of age [term infants]). Immunogenicity was evaluated using validated assays. Data were pooled into term (N = 127) and preterm infants (N = 105), and infants of women who received a Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (N = 199) or not (N = 33). RESULTS Before primary vaccination, antibody levels were higher for term than preterm infants for anti-D, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP, and similar for anti-HBs and anti-T. At this time, infants of Tdap-vaccinated women had higher anti-D, anti-T, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP antibody levels than infants of Tdap-unvaccinated women; anti-HBs and anti-polio antibody levels were similar in both groups. Post-primary, pre-booster, and post-booster, there were only small differences in seroprotection rates (anti-D, anti-T, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-HBs, anti-PRP) and seroconversion rates (anti-PT, anti-FHA), except for anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥ 0.15 µg/mL post-primary vaccination (higher for term [98.31 % and 90.91 %, respectively] versus preterm infants [89.80 % and 79.41 %, respectively]). CONCLUSIONS These data support the use of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T vaccine for primary and booster vaccination in term and preterm born infants and in infants born to Tdap-vaccinated or Tdap-unvaccinated women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - M R P Orije
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geoghegan S, Shuster S, Butler KM, Feemster KA. Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Maternal Immunization: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis of the Published Literature. Matern Child Health J 2022; 26:2198-2209. [PMID: 36173503 PMCID: PMC9521012 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03508-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Vaccines are being developed against Group B Streptococcus and respiratory syncytial virus. These vaccines are designed to be given to pregnant women to protect infants; thus, their success depends on uptake in this population. Maternal immunization programs have struggled to achieve target coverage rates. This systematic narrative synthesis aims to define the most important barriers and facilitators for maternal immunization and to identify priority areas for future research. Methods A search strategy was developed in Medline and adapted according to the requirements of additional search engines. Two reviewers independently reviewed the studies, using pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results sections of included studies were coded, and thematic analysis was used to identify prominent themes. Results 321 studies were included in the final review. Most studies came from North America (37%), Europe (26%) or East Asia, Australia and New Zealand (22%). Low-and middle-income countries were under-represented. Five percent of studies came from Sub-Saharan Africa, and 2% came from South Asia. The prominent factors impacting maternal immunization were provider recommendation, perceived risks and benefits of maternal vaccines for the infant, race, birthplace, and access to healthcare. Few studies explored reasons behind racial and socioeconomic disparities in maternal immunization rates. Discussion A strong provider recommendation, equitable access to prenatal care and messaging that focuses on vaccine safety and infant benefits emerged as the key components for optimising vaccine uptake among pregnant women. Research among healthcare providers, minority groups and in low- and-middle-income countries was lacking. In anticipation of the expansion of maternal immunization programmes, focused research is needed to address these gaps and inform a successful public health strategy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10995-022-03508-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Geoghegan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. .,University College Dublin School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Sydney Shuster
- Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Karina M Butler
- University College Dublin School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland
| | - Kristen A Feemster
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Building 421, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc, 351 North Sumneytown Pike, Upper Gwynedd, PA, 19454, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Munter AC, Hautvast JL, Ruijs WL, Henri Spaan D, Hulscher ME, Ruiter RA. Deciding about maternal pertussis vaccination: associations between intention, and needs and values in a vaccine-hesitant religious group. Vaccine 2022; 40:5213-5222. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
6
|
Young A, Charania NA, Gauld N, Norris P, Turner N, Willing E. Knowledge and decisions about maternal immunisation by pregnant women in Aotearoa New Zealand. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:779. [PMID: 35698133 PMCID: PMC9192336 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08162-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal vaccinations for influenza and pertussis are recommended in New Zealand to protect mothers and their infant from infection. However, maternal immunisation coverage in New Zealand is suboptimal. Furthermore, there is unacceptable inequitable maternal immunisation rates across the country with Māori and Pacific women having significantly lower maternal immunisation rates than those of other New Zealanders. METHODS This research set out to explore what pregnant/recently pregnant Māori and Pacific women knew about immunisation during pregnancy and what factors influenced their decision to be vaccinated. A semi-structured interview guide was developed with questions focusing on knowledge of pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy and decision-making. Māori and Pacific women aged over 16 years were purposively sampled and interviewed in Dunedin and Gisborne, New Zealand between May and August 2021. Interviews were analysed following a directed qualitative content approach. Data were arranged into coding nodes based on the study aims (deductive analysis) informed by previous literature and within these participant experiences were inductively coded into themes and subthemes. RESULTS Not all women were aware of maternal vaccine recommendations or they diseases they protected against. Many underestimated how dangerous influenza and pertussis could be and some were more concerned about potential harms of the vaccine. Furthermore, understanding potential harms of infection and protection provided by vaccination did not necessarily mean women would choose to be vaccinated. Those who decided to vaccinate felt well-informed, had vaccination recommended by their healthcare provider, and did so to protect their and their infant's health. Those who decided against vaccination were concerned about safety of the vaccines, lacked the information they needed, were not offered the vaccine, or did not consider vaccination a priority. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of understanding about vaccine benefits and risks of vaccine-preventable diseases which can result in the reinforcement of negative influences such as the fear of side effects. Furthermore, if vaccine benefits are not understood, inaccessibility of vaccines and the precedence of other life priorities may prevent uptake. Being well-informed and supported to make positive decisions to vaccinate in pregnancy is likely to improve vaccine coverage in Māori and Pacific Island New Zealanders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Young
- Division of Health Sciences , Kōhatu-Centre for Hauora Māori, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, PO Box 56 , 9054, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| | - Nadia A Charania
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Natalie Gauld
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Pauline Norris
- Va'a o Tautai - Centre for Pacific Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Nikki Turner
- Immunisation Advisory Centre, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Esther Willing
- Division of Health Sciences , Kōhatu-Centre for Hauora Māori, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, PO Box 56 , 9054, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilbert NL, Guay M, Kokaua J, Lévesque I, Castillo E, Poliquin V. Pertussis vaccination in Canadian pregnant women, 2018-2019. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:762-768. [PMID: 35151906 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to measure the uptake of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Canada and to identify sociodemographic factors associated with non-vaccination. METHODS A total of 5091 biological mothers of children born between September 2, 2018, and March 1, 2019, were interviewed about pertussis vaccination during their pregnancy. RESULTS Among 4607 mothers who recalled whether they had been vaccinated for pertussis, 43% had been vaccinated and 57% had not. The main reason given by mothers for not having been vaccinated was not being aware that pertussis vaccination was recommended. Factors independently associated with non-vaccination were being born outside Canada, lower household income, living in a province or territory where pertussis vaccination was not provided free of charge, having had previous live births, and having received maternity care from a midwife. CONCLUSION Advice from the maternity care provider is an important driver of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas L Gilbert
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON; École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC.
| | - Mireille Guay
- Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - Jackie Kokaua
- Centre for Social Data Integration and Development, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - Isabelle Lévesque
- Centre for Social Data Integration and Development, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON
| | - Eliana Castillo
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Vanessa Poliquin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cappozzo F, Dal Zotto A, Scollo M, Bernardini D, Maria Dal Zotto A, Bonvecchio L, Tognetto G, Marinangeli S, Negrello C, Lanza P, Cocco A, Falivene P, Vianello L, Di Caprio A, Gabutti G, Saugo M. dTap vaccination uptake during pregnancy: Pregnant women-focused and health professionals-focused predictors in the Veneto Region (Italy). Vaccine 2021; 39:6913-6919. [PMID: 34711438 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recommendations, the uptake of dTap maternal vaccination is still low in many countries. The reasons for this must be investigated both on the patient's and the healthcare professionals' sides. METHODS A record linkage study was performed linking Birth Assitance Certificates and dTap mothers' vaccination records (5183 deliveries) to describe the influence of socioeconomical and obstetrical-gynecological factors after the recommendations concerning dTap vaccination in pregnancy issued by the Italian Ministry of Health (August 2018). An interview was also administered to a subgroup of 656 new mothers on the occasion of the first vaccination of their newborns, in order to assess the dTap vaccination advice received from maternal care providers during pregnancy. A generalized linear model (binomial family, log link) was implemented to give a correct estimate of the mother's relative risk of being vaccinated. RESULTS Several pregnant women-focused factors are evident, but the most important ones are related to maternal care providers' practices: after mutual adjustment, the explicit advice towards dTap maternal vaccination given by the Obstetrician-Gynecologist or the Midwife is associated with a 12-fold increase in the dTap coverage. CONCLUSIONS Multiprofessional training is essential to make Obstetricians-Gynecologists and Midwives more confident in recommending dTaP maternal immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cappozzo
- Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Scollo
- Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Daniele Bernardini
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Bonvecchio
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Gabriella Tognetto
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Negrello
- Family Counseling Center, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Paola Lanza
- Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocco
- Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Falivene
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Liviano Vianello
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Caprio
- Health Services Director, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gabutti
- Department of Medical Sciences,University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mario Saugo
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit 7, Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maertens K, Orije MRP, Herzog SA, Mahieu LM, Hens N, Van Damme P, Leuridan E. Pertussis immunization during pregnancy: assessment of the role of maternal antibodies on immune responses in term and preterm born infants. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 74:189-198. [PMID: 33971009 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist on the impact of maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, acellular Pertussis (aP) (Tdap) vaccination for preterm born infants. We report its effect at birth and on antibody-mediated immune responses to a DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine in preterm compared to term infants. METHODS Women delivering at term or prematurely were either vaccinated with a Tdap vaccine (Boostrix®, GSK) during pregnancy or not vaccinated in the last 5 years. Cord and maternal blood were collected at delivery. Infants were vaccinated with DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine (Hexyon®, Sanofi Pasteur) and bled before and one month after primary (8-12-16 weeks) and before and one month after booster vaccination (13 or 15 months for preterm and term respectively). Immunoglobulin G antibodies against all antigens included in DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine were measured (NCT02511327). RESULTS Cord blood Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in preterm infants from Tdap-vaccinated women were significantly higher than in term and preterm infants from unvaccinated women. A longer time interval between maternal vaccination and delivery resulted in higher cord blood GMCs in preterm infants. Equal GMCs in term and preterm infants from Tdap-vaccinated women were observed after primary vaccination. After boosting, significantly lower GMCs were seen for PT, FHA and TT in preterm compared to term infants from Tdap-vaccinated women, yet still comparable to GMCs in both term and preterm infants from unvaccinated women. CONCLUSION Preterm infants profit from maternal Tdap vaccination. Prematurity did not influence primary immune responses in the presence of maternal antibodies, but was associated with a lower booster immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marjolein R P Orije
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sereina A Herzog
- Centre for Health Economic Research and Modeling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ludo M Mahieu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Niel Hens
- Centre for Health Economic Research and Modeling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BIOSTAT), Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moons P, Fieuws S, Vandermeulen C, Ombelet F, Willems R, Goossens E, Van Bulck L, de Hosson M, Annemans L, Budts W, De Backer J, Moniotte S, Marelli A, De Groote K. Influenza Vaccination in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease in the Pre-COVID-19 Era: Coverage Rate, Patient Characteristics, and Outcomes. Can J Cardiol 2021; 37:1472-1479. [PMID: 33961983 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination is the most commonly recommended immune prevention strategy. However, data on influenza vaccination in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are scarce. In this study, our goals were to: (1) measure vaccination coverage rates (VCRs) for influenza in a large cohort of children, adolescents, and adults with CHD; (2) identity patient characteristics as predictors for vaccination; and (3) investigate the effect of influenza vaccination on hospitalization. METHODS A nationwide cohort study in Belgium included 16,778 patients, representing 134,782 vaccination years, from the Belgian Congenital Heart Disease Database Combining Administrative and Clinical Data (BELCODAC). Data over 9 vaccination years (2006-2015) were used, and patients were stratified into 5 age cohorts: 6 months to 4 years; 5-17 years; 18-49 years; 50-64 years; and 65 years and older. RESULTS In the respective age cohorts, the VCR was estimated to be 6.6%, 8.0%, 23.9%, 46.6%, and 72.8%. There was a steep increase in VCRs as of the age of 40 years. Multivariable logistic regression showed that higher anatomical complexity of CHD, older age, presence of genetic syndromes, and previous cardiac interventions were associated with significantly higher VCRs. Among adults, men had lower and pregnant women had higher VCRs. The association between influenza vaccination and all-cause hospitalization was not significant in this study. CONCLUSIONS The influenza VCR in people with CHD is low, especially in children and adolescents. Older patients, particularly those with complex CHD, are well covered. Our findings should inform vaccination promotion strategies in populations with CHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Moons
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Fouke Ombelet
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; VIB - Center of Brain and Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eva Goossens
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, Division of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Liesbet Van Bulck
- KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michèle de Hosson
- Department of Adult Congenital Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Werner Budts
- KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Congenital and Structural Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julie De Backer
- Department of Adult Congenital Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Moniotte
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arianne Marelli
- McGill Adult Unit for Congenital Heart Disease Excellence (MAUDE Unit), McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Katya De Groote
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hahn BA, de Gier B, van Kassel MN, Bijlsma MW, van Leeuwen E, Wouters MGAJ, van der Ende A, van de Beek D, Wallinga J, Hahné SJM, Jan van Hoek A. Cost-effectiveness of maternal immunization against neonatal invasive Group B Streptococcus in the Netherlands. Vaccine 2021; 39:2876-2885. [PMID: 33895018 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonatal invasive Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection causes considerable disease burden in the Netherlands. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) prevents early-onset disease (EOD), but has no effect on late-onset disease (LOD). A potential maternal GBS vaccine could prevent both EOD and LOD by conferring immunity in neonates. OBJECTIVE Explore under which circumstances maternal vaccination against GBS would be cost-effective as an addition to, or replacement for the current risk factor-based IAP prevention strategy in the Netherlands. METHODS We assessed the maximum cost-effective price per dose of a trivalent (serotypes Ia, Ib, and III) and hexavalent (additional serotypes II, IV, and V) GBS vaccine in addition to, or as a replacement for IAP. To project the prevented costs and disease burden, a decision tree model was developed to reflect neonatal GBS disease and long-term health outcomes among a cohort based on 169,836 live births in the Netherlands in 2017. RESULTS Under base-case conditions, maternal immunization with a trivalent vaccine would gain 186 QALYs and prevent more than €3.1 million in health care costs when implemented in addition to IAP. Immunization implemented as a replacement for IAP would gain 88 QALYs compared to the current prevention strategy, prevent €1.5 million in health care costs, and avoid potentially ~ 30,000 IAP administrations. The base-case results correspond to a maximum price of €58 per dose (vaccine + administration costs; using a threshold of €20,000/QALY). Expanding the serotype coverage to a hexavalent vaccine would only have a limited additional impact on the cost-effectiveness in the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS A maternal GBS vaccine could be cost-effective when implemented in addition to the current risk factor-based IAP prevention strategy in the Netherlands. Discontinuation of IAP would save costs and prevent antibiotic use, however, is projected to lead to a lower health gain compared to vaccination in addition to IAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A Hahn
- Athena Institute, VU Amsterdam, the Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (Cib), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Brechje de Gier
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (Cib), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Merel N van Kassel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, the Netherlands
| | - Merijn W Bijlsma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maurice G A J Wouters
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arie van der Ende
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Microbiology, Infection and Immunity, and Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diederik van de Beek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, the Netherlands
| | - Jacco Wallinga
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (Cib), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Susan J M Hahné
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (Cib), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Albert Jan van Hoek
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (Cib), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Orije MRP, Larivière Y, Herzog SA, Mahieu LM, Van Damme P, Leuridan E, Maertens K. Breast milk antibody levels in Tdap vaccinated women after preterm delivery. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:e1305-e1313. [PMID: 33768227 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND & AIMS Enrichment of breast milk (BM) with immunoglobin (Ig)A and IgG, through maternal vaccination, could help young infants combat targeted pathogens. However, evidence on this effect after preterm delivery is lacking. This study investigated the total and anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT) specific IgA and IgG production in BM after term or preterm delivery in the presence of maternal Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis) vaccination. METHODS Serum and BM samples of lactating women, who delivered at term or prematurely and did or did not receive Tdap vaccine (Boostrix®, GSK Biologicals) during pregnancy, were collected as part of a clinical study (N=234, NCT02511327). Anti-PT IgA/IgG (IBL®; MSD®) and Total IgA/IgG (Thermofisher®, on BM samples only) immunosorbent assays were performed on all samples collected at 72 hours, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postpartum. RESULTS BM after preterm delivery contained anti-PT IgA and IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) comparable to those after term delivery (e.g. colostrum anti-PT IgA: 5.39 International Units per milliliter (IU/mL) vs 6.69 IU/mL, respectively). Maternal Tdap vaccination induced significantly higher anti-PT IgG GMC's in colostrum of vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women delivering at term (0.110 IU/mL vs 0.027 IU/mL, p=0.009). Compliance with postpartum vaccination led to no differences in BM after 4 weeks postpartum. Anti-PT antibodies persisted up to 12 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that maternal Tdap vaccination induces high Ig levels in BM after both term and preterm delivery and that these antibodies remain abundantly present throughout lactation, possibly offering additional mucosal protection during the most vulnerable period in early life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein R P Orije
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV); Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ynke Larivière
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV); Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sereina A Herzog
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID); Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO); University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ludo M Mahieu
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology; University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV); Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV); Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination (CEV); Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okoli GN, Reddy VK, Al-Yousif Y, Neilson CJ, Mahmud SM, Abou-Setta AM. Sociodemographic and health-related determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence since 2000. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:997-1009. [PMID: 33420724 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccination is considered to be the most practical and effective preventative measure against influenza. It is highly recommended for population subgroups most at risk of developing complications, including pregnant women. However, seasonal influenza vaccine uptake remains suboptimal among pregnant women, even in jurisdictions with universal vaccination. We summarized the evidence on the determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy to better understand factors that influence vaccine uptake among pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from January 2000 to February 2020 for publications in English reporting on sociodemographic and/or health-related determinants of seasonal influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy. Two reviewers independently included studies. One reviewer extracted data and assessed study quality, and another reviewer checked extracted data and study quality assessments for errors. Disagreements were resolved through consensus, or a third reviewer. We meta-analyzed using the inverse variance, random-effects method, and reported the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS From 1663 retrieved citations, we included 36 studies. The following factors were associated with increased seasonal influenza vaccine uptake: Older age (20 studies: OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), being nulliparous (13 studies: OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38), married (8 studies: OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), employed (4 studies: OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24), a non-smoker (8 studies: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.51) and having prenatal care (3 studies: OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.25-5.02), a chronic condition (6 studies: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.44), been previously vaccinated (9 studies: OR 4.88, 95% CI 3.14-7.57) and living in a rural area (9 studies: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14). Compared with being black, being white was also associated with increased seasonal influenza vaccine uptake (11 studies: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.20-1.41). CONCLUSIONS The evidence suggests that several sociodemographic and health-related factors may determine seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy, and that parity, history of influenza vaccination, prenatal care and comorbidity status may be influential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George N Okoli
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,George & Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Vaccine and Drug Evaluation Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Viraj K Reddy
- George & Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Yahya Al-Yousif
- George & Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Christine J Neilson
- Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Salaheddin M Mahmud
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Vaccine and Drug Evaluation Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- George & Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Munter AC, Ruijs WLM, Ruiter RAC, van Nimwegen DJJ, Oerlemans AJM, van Ginkel R, Hulscher MEJL, Hautvast JLA. Decision-making on maternal pertussis vaccination among women in a vaccine-hesitant religious group: Stages and needs. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0242261. [PMID: 33180859 PMCID: PMC7660565 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As of December 2019, pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered pertussis vaccination to protect their newborn infant against pertussis infection. However, the manner in which pregnant women decide about this maternal pertussis vaccination is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the decision-making process regarding maternal pertussis vaccination, and to explore the related needs among the vaccine-hesitant subgroup of orthodox Protestant women. METHODS Charmaz's grounded theory approach was used to develop a decision-making framework. To construct this framework we used an explorative multimethod approach in which in-depth interviews and online focus groups were supplemented by a literature search and research group meetings. This study was carried out in a hypothetical situation since the maternal pertussis vaccination had yet to be implemented in the Dutch immunisation programme at the time of the study. RESULTS Twenty-five orthodox Protestant women participated in an interview, an online focus group, or in both. The findings of this study resulted in a decision-making framework that included three stages of decision-making; an Orientation stage, a value-based Deliberation stage, and Final decision stage. The Orientation stage included the needs for decision-making categorised into Information needs and Conversation needs. Women indicated that -if they were to receive sufficient time for Orientation and Deliberation- they would be able to reach the stage of Final decision. CONCLUSION The decision-making framework resulting from our findings can be used by health care professionals to provide women with information and consultation in the decision-making process. Future studies should investigate whether the stages of and needs for decision-making can be found across other vaccine-hesitant subgroups and vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C. de Munter
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Infectious Disease Control, GGD Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wilhelmina L. M. Ruijs
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Infectious Disease Control, GGD Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A. C. Ruiter
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dagmar J. J. van Nimwegen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Infectious Disease Control, GGD Gelderland-Zuid, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anke J. M. Oerlemans
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rijk van Ginkel
- “Fruits of Passion; Together Fighting Human Suffering”, Bodegraven, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. J. L. Hulscher
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeannine L. A. Hautvast
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dubé E, Gagnon D, Kaminsky K, Green CR, Ouakki M, Bettinger JA, Brousseau N, Castillo E, Crowcroft NS, Driedger SM, Greyson D, Fell D, Fisher W, Gagneur A, Guay M, Halperin D, Halperin SA, MacDonald S, Meyer SB, Waite NM, Wilson K, Witteman HO, Yudin M, Cook JL. Vaccination during pregnancy: Canadian maternity care providers' opinions and practices. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:2789-2799. [PMID: 32271655 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1735225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A number of countries have implemented vaccination in pregnancy as a strategy to reduce the burden of influenza and pertussis. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of Canadian maternity care providers in administration of vaccines to their pregnant patients. A cross-sectional web-based survey was sent to family physicians, obstetricians-gynecologists, midwives, pharmacists, and nurses. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine variables independently associated with offering vaccination services in pregnancy in providers' practice. A total of 1,135 participants participated. Overall, 64% (n = 724) of the participants reported offering vaccines in their practice and 56% (n = 632) reported offering vaccines to pregnant patients. The main reasons reported for not offering vaccination services in pregnancy were the belief that vaccination was outside of the scope of practice; logistical issues around access to vaccines; or lack of staff to administer vaccines. In multivariable analysis, the main factors associated with vaccination of pregnant patients in practices where vaccination services were offered were: providers' confidence in counseling pregnant patients about vaccines, seeing fewer than 11 pregnant patients on average each week, and being a nurse or a family physician. Although the majority of participants expressed strong support for vaccination during pregnancy, half were not offering vaccination services in their practice. Many were not equipped to offer vaccines in their practice or felt that it was not their role to do so. To enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake in pregnancy, it will be important to address the logistical barriers identified in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Dubé
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Dominique Gagnon
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Kyla Kaminsky
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| | - Courtney R Green
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| | - Manale Ouakki
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nicholas Brousseau
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada
| | - Eliana Castillo
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada
| | - Natasha S Crowcroft
- Public Health Ontario, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
| | - S Michelle Driedger
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Devon Greyson
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
| | - Deshayne Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Canada.,Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario , Ottawa, Canada
| | - William Fisher
- Department of Psychology, Western University , London, Canada
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Département des soins de santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Maryse Guay
- Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec , Québec, Canada.,Centre de recherche de l'hôpital Charles Le Moyne , Longueuil, Canada
| | - Donna Halperin
- School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University , Antigonish, Canada
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Department of Pediatrics, Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre , Halifax, Canada
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Faculty of Nursing, School of Public Health, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada
| | - Samantha B Meyer
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Canada
| | - Nancy M Waite
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Canada
| | | | - Holly O Witteman
- Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Université Laval , Québec, Canada
| | - Mark Yudin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
| | - Jocelynn L Cook
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada , Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shono A, Hoshi SL, Kondo M. Maternal influenza vaccination relates to receiving relevant information among pregnant women in Japan. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:1364-1370. [PMID: 31850838 PMCID: PMC7482762 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1697109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 11/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal vaccination for seasonal influenza is currently not listed as a routine vaccination in the national vaccination schedule of Japan. However, many pregnant women voluntarily receive an influenza vaccination. We explored the factors related to influenza vaccine uptake. We particularly focused on factors related to any recommendation, such as advice or suggestions from another individual. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey in Japan among pregnant women or mothers who had recently given birth in March 2017 and 2018. Logistic regression models were used to determine the factors influencing vaccination uptake. Key individuals regarding maternal vaccination were examined using the network visualization software Gephi. The total number of valid responses was 2204 in 2017 and 3580 in 2018. Over 40% of respondents had been vaccinated with the seasonal influenza vaccine at some point in both years. Of the vaccinated respondents, over 80% received advice regarding the influenza vaccination. Obstetricians were the most common source of advice in both years. Among respondents who chose more than two sources, the largest link in the network of sources was found between the obstetrician and family members. Attention to public concern or potential recommenders, by public health authorities, not just pregnant women, about the benefits of maternal influenza vaccination is important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiko Shono
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shu-Ling Hoshi
- Department of Health Care Policy and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masahide Kondo
- Department of Health Care Policy and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brillo E, Tosto V, Giardina I, Buonomo E. Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza immunization: an overview. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34:3415-3444. [PMID: 31645152 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1680633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza immunization for women during pregnancy (the so-called "maternal immunization") has been introduced in several countries, and recently also in Italy, to protect mother and fetus during pregnancy, infant in his first months of life and mother during postpartum period. However, very low vaccination coverage rates have been reached due to several variables. METHODS A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase, including any experimental or observational studies, to assesses existing evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, safety and optimal timing of administration of Tdap and influenza immunization in pregnancy for mothers and their infants. The search was finalized in August 2019. RESULTS Reviewing the literature, we identified only a few studies that, among several maternal and infant outcomes, found sporadic significant associations with maternal influenza immunization and even less with Tdap immunization. Moreover, most of the authors of these studies explained these findings as a result of residual confounding effect. The effectiveness of maternal influenza immunization is more complicated to prove than the effectiveness of Tdap immunization because of several reasons. Not all nations recommend and offer vaccines in the same weeks of pregnancy and this one manifests the complexity in defining the best timing for Tdap or influenza immunization. CONCLUSIONS The safety of maternal Tdap or influenza immunization is supported by the evidence so far, however, regular surveillance should be maintained, especially with regard to the influenza vaccine that changes in formulation each year. There is a need to optimize the timing of vaccination in pregnancy and to have a national system of detection of maternal immunization in each country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Brillo
- Center for Research in Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Tosto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Irene Giardina
- Center for Research in Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ersilia Buonomo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maertens K, Leuridan E. Maternal pertussis immunisation as the first infant dose. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2019; 19:342-344. [PMID: 30938291 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30739-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp 2610, Belgium
| | - Elke Leuridan
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp 2610, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Krishnaswamy S, Lambach P, Giles ML. Key considerations for successful implementation of maternal immunization programs in low and middle income countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15:942-950. [PMID: 30676250 PMCID: PMC6605837 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1564433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The Maternal Neonatal Tetanus Elimination program is proof of concept for the feasibility and potential for maternal immunization to reduce neonatal mortality particularly in low and middle-income countries. Introduction of any additional vaccine into the antenatal space, such as Influenza and Pertussis, and potentially Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Group B Streptococcus vaccines in the future, requires strengthening of antenatal care and immunization services. Successful implementation also requires robust disease surveillance in pregnant women and neonates and active surveillance for adverse events following immunization to monitor the impact and ensure the safe use of the vaccine. This review outlines five key elements essential for successful implementation of a maternal immunization program focusing particularly on low and middle-income countries. These include; relevant considerations in supporting a decision to undertake a maternal immunization program including knowledge of local disease epidemiology, involvement of the consumer, healthcare provider recommendation, equitable access to maternal vaccination, and systems for disease surveillance, program evaluation and safety monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushena Krishnaswamy
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Philipp Lambach
- Initiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- The Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|