Rethinking results from the Japanese 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine randomized clinical trial

Pneumococcal Vaccination in Adults: What Can We Learn From Observational Studies That Evaluated PCV13 and PPV23 Effectiveness in the Same Population?

INTRODUCTION

Fifteen and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15; PCV20) were recently licensed to prevent pneumococcal disease in adults. In the absence of efficacy or effectiveness data for these new vaccines, studies comparing 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and PCV13 might help inform decision-making on how to best implement expanded-valency PCVs. Comparing PPV23 and PCV13 is problematic, as no head-to-head clinical trials evaluated efficacy. Comparing effectiveness results across observational studies that vary by population, design, and outcomes is difficult. To address these limitations, we undertook a narrative review of studies that assessed PPV23 and PCV13 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the same adult populations.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar and screened 525 studies using a standardized evaluation framework.

RESULTS

Nine studies met inclusion criteria, all from high-income countries. None evaluated invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) alone. VE against vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia ranged from 2 to 6% for PPV23 and 41 to 71% for PCV13. VE against pneumococcal pneumonia or severe pneumococcal disease (IPD or pneumococcal pneumonia) ranged from -10 to 11% for PPV23, 40 to 79% for PCV13, and 39 to 83% for sequential PCV13/PPV23. VE against all-cause pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infection ranged from -8 to 3% for PPV23 and 9 to 12% for PCV13.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, PCV13 demonstrated better protection than PPV23 against pneumococcal disease and all-cause respiratory outcomes in the included studies. Where evaluated, sequential PCV13/PPV23 vaccination showed little benefit over PCV13 alone. Results support the use of PCVs to protect against pneumococcal disease and respiratory infections in adults.

Polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines to Streptococcus pneumoniae generate distinct humoral responses

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia, bacteremia, and meningitis in older adults worldwide. Two pneumococcal vaccines containing S. pneumoniae capsular polysaccharides are in current use: the polysaccharide vaccine PPSV23 and the glycoconjugate vaccine PCV13. In clinical trials, both vaccines elicit similar opsonophagocytic killing activity. In contrast to polysaccharide vaccines, conjugate vaccines have shown consistent efficacy against nasopharyngeal carriage and noninvasive pneumonia overall and for some prevalent individual serotypes. Given these different clinical profiles, it is crucial to understand the differential immunological responses induced by these two vaccines. Here, we used a high-throughput systems serology approach to profile the biophysical and functional features of serum antibodies induced by PCV13 and PPSV23 at 1 month and 1 year. In comparison with PPSV23, PCV13 induced higher titers across antibody isotypes; more durable antibody responses across immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM isotypes; and increased antigenic breadth. Although titers measured in opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assays were similar between the two groups, confirming what was observed in clinical studies, serum samples from PCV13 vaccinees could induce additional non-OPA antibody-dependent functions, including monocyte phagocytosis and natural killer cell activation. In a multivariate modeling approach, distinct humoral profiles were demonstrated in each arm. Together, these results demonstrate that the glycoconjugate PCV13 vaccine induces an antigenically broader, more durable, polyfunctional antibody response. These findings may help explain the increased protection against S. pneumoniae colonization and noninvasive pneumonia and the longer duration of protection against invasive pneumococcal disease, mediated by PCV13.

Interrupted time-series analyses of routine vaccination program for elderly pneumonia patients in Japan; an ecological study using aggregated nationwide inpatient data

A national routine pneumococcal pneumonia immunization program started in Japan in 2014. It targeted the population aged ≥65 years and used a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; PPSV23. However, its effectiveness was not well defined because of the lack of a comprehensive database on the PPSV23 vaccination status of each subject. We used interrupted time-series analyses to assess the changes in the incidence and prognosis of elderly patients hospitalized for pneumonia before and after initiation of the program. First, we estimated the PPSV23 coverage rates in subjects aged ≥65 years based on the number of shipped PPSV23 syringes and the estimated population in each prefecture. The estimated coverage rates reached around 40% in 2014 for the 3 Tohoku prefectures, while those in the other prefectures remained below 20%. After the national routine immunization program started, the estimated coverage rate increased significantly in every prefecture and exceeded 40% in 2017. Next, we aggregated the data extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from April 2011 through February 2017 for hospitalized pneumonia patients aged ≥65 years. The data included data from 655,746 patients, excluding those in the 3 Tohoku prefectures. Interrupted time-series analyses found no change in the incidence of hospitalized pneumonia patients and in-hospital mortality after the vaccination program, but there was a decrease in the in-hospital mortality of pneumonia patients with severe comorbidities defined by the modified Charlson comorbidity index. These results suggest an association between the vaccination program and an improved outcome in hospitalized elderly pneumonia patients with severe comorbidities in Japan.

Pneumococcal Pneumonia and Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Those 65 and Older: Rates of Detection, Risk Factors, Vaccine Effectiveness, Hospitalisation and Mortality

Pneumococcal pneumonia (PP) and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) are important causes of morbidity and mortality in seniors worldwide. Incidence rates and serious outcomes worsen with increasing frailty, numbers of risk factors and decreasing immune competence with increasing age. Literature reviews in Medline and Embase were performed for pneumococcal disease incidence, risk factors, vaccination rates and effectiveness in the elderly. The introduction of protein-conjugated pneumoccal vaccines (PCV) for children markedly reduced IPD and PP in seniors, but serotypes not included in vaccines and with previously low levels increased. Pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPV23) vaccination does not change nasal and pharyngeal carriage rates. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates in seniors are below guideline levels, especially in older seniors and nursing home staff. Pneumococcal and influenza carriage and vaccination rates of family members, nursing home health care workers and other contacts are unknown. National vaccination programmes are effective in increasing vaccination rates. Detection of IPD and PP initially depend on clinical symptoms and new chest X ray infiltrates and then varies according to the population and laboratory tests used. To understand how seniors and especially older seniors acquire PP and IPD data are needed on pneumococcal disease and carriage rates in family members, carers and contacts. Nursing homes need reconfiguring into small units with air ventilation externally from all rooms to minimise respiratory disease transmission and dedicated staff for each unit to minimise transmision of infectious diseaases.

The Japanese 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine randomized clinical trial: Further reflections on the design and results

The recent article by Gessner et al. discussed several concerns regarding the design and results of the clinical trial by Maruyama et al. in 2010 on the vaccine efficacy (VE) of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. First, Gessner et al. questioned the integrity of the study randomization and blinding. Maruyama et al. have indicated that study participants were individually randomized and blinding was maintained throughout the study. Second, Gessner et al. questioned the internal validity of the trial results. Gessner et al. applied the reported VE against pneumococcal pneumonia and assumptions to estimate how much all-cause pneumonia could be prevented resulting in a "VE" estimate of 19.5%. This estimate does not truly qualify as a VE estimate, but as vaccine effectiveness estimate from a hypothetical cohort. The randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted by Maruyama et al. met the methodological standards for a randomized control trial and its results are unquestionably valid.