A case series of acute pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination in the context of recent reports from Europe and the United States

Low incidence of de novo HLA antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination: A cohort study of patients awaiting kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA Abs) are associated with an increased risk of allograft loss. Herein, we report the prospective follow-up for anti-HLA Abs formation in 103 patients with end-stage kidney disease on the waiting list for transplantation who underwent COVID-19 vaccination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sera were tested before and after vaccination using Luminex technology. The cohort comprised of 62 males and 41 females with a mean age of 56 ± 14 years. The patients received BNT162b2 (80.4%), mRNA-1273 (18.5%), AZD1222 (0.40%), or ChAdOx1-S (0.80%) vaccine. Patients were tested before and within 119 ± 50, 95 ± 46 and 25 ± 26 days after the first, second, and third dose of the vaccine, respectively.

RESULTS

No significant change in calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) after vaccination was seen. Although 98.1% of patients had no change in anti-HLA Abs profile or cPRA after vaccination, two patients (1.9%) developed de novo anti-HLA Abs against class I or II HLA antigens. In those two patients, the cPRA changed from 0% and 63% at baseline to 9% and 90% after vaccination, respectively. Both patients received the BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine. The earliest detected anti-HLA Abs was 18 days after the first dose.

CONCLUSION

In rare cases, new anti-HLA antibodies were observed after COVID-19 vaccination, with potential implications for transplantation. The low incidence of this phenomenon is outweighed by the clinical benefits of vaccination.

Immediate and Long-Term Adverse Events of COVID-19 Vaccines: A One-Year Follow-Up Study From the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Background The administration of COVID-19 vaccines has been critical in controlling the spread of the virus. However, understanding the potential adverse events (AEs) associated with these vaccines is crucial for public health. While most previous studies observed only short-term AEs, this study aimed to investigate the immediate and long-term AEs following the first and second doses of Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Sinopharm vaccines, providing valuable long-term insights. Methodology A prospective, one-year, follow-up study was conducted by tracking 922 vaccinated individuals to assess short-term and long-term AEs. Demographics, clinical characteristics, vaccine types, and dose effects were taken into consideration. AEs were classified based on severity and duration. Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences among the vaccine groups, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. Bowker's and chi-square tests were performed using JMP Pro 14.3.0. Results Of the 922 participants, 55.53% (n = 512) were vaccinated with Pfizer, and 23.32% (n = 215) and 21.15% (n = 195) were vaccinated with Sinopharm and AstraZeneca, respectively. Overall, 72.34% of participants (n = 667) were suffering from AEs after the first dose, with a lower prevalence of AEs after the second dose (52.71%, n = 486). Pfizer exhibited the highest percentage and severity of AEs, followed by AstraZeneca and Sinopharm. Most AEs reported in this study were mild and resolved within 72 hours, with females experiencing more frequent AEs. The common short-term AEs observed were fever, injection-site pain, myalgia, fatigue, and headache. Notably, there were no chronic AEs, and only one case of myocarditis was associated with AstraZeneca. Conclusions Despite the variation in the prevalence of AEs among the three vaccines, the vaccination process proved to be safe with no serious short-term AEs. However, the long-term AEs associated with AstraZeneca and the decrease in the prevalence of AEs after the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccines warrant further investigations and priority for future research.

D-dimer as a diagnostic and prognostic plasma biomarker in patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis

OBJECTIVES

The impact of plasma biomarkers on diagnosis and prognosis of patients with acute pericarditis (AP) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to assess the diagnostic and prognostic role of d-dimer (DD), an easily obtainable biomarker, in patients with AP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective clinical study enrolling 265 consecutive patients hospitalized between September 2010 and May 2019 with a first episode of AP. At baseline, demographics, clinical features, laboratory and imaging findings were recorded. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 18 months. Endpoints included cardiac tamponade, new-onset atrial fibrillation, pericardial drainage, recurrent/constrictive pericarditis and death.

RESULTS

DD was measured in 165 out of 265 patients (62.3%, median levels 1456 ng/mL) Among them, 121 patients (73.3%) presented with elevated age-adjusted DD levels. Patients with elevated DD depicted a higher rate of pleural (69.4%, vs 38.6%, p<0.001) and pericardial effusions (89.3% vs 72.7%, p = 0.009). Elevated DD correlated with admission (rho=0.37) and peak (rho=0.36) C-reactive protein values. Patients with elevated DD depicted a trend towards a greater prevalence of pericardial tamponade vs those without (14.9% vs 4.5% respectively, p = 0.07). In the 43.8% of patients with elevated DD who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), no case of pulmonary embolism or aortic syndrome was unveiled.

CONCLUSION

DD elevation is detected in the majority of AP cases at presentation and may herald cardiac tamponade. In patients with chest pain not attributable to alternative causes, elevated DD denotes an inflammatory condition and should not prompt unnecessary investigations, such as CTPA.

Pustular Eruption following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Narrative Case-Based Review

From the beginning of public vaccinations until the relaxation of COVID-19 measures, many case reports, case series and case-control studies have been published indicating cutaneous side effects of COVID-19 vaccination. Post-vaccination pustular eruption was reported as well, with a challenging differential diagnosis between pustular psoriasis, AGEP (acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis) and neutrophil pustular eruptions. We report a case of 56-year-old woman presented with acute generalized pustular flare up culminated 5 days after the second dose of BNT162b2(Pfizer) vaccination. She was diagnosed with pustular psoriasis flare and due to the regulating role of IL-1 in pustular psoriasis and in the cytokine storm observed in cases of COVID-19 postvaccination inflammation; we decided to treat the patient with an IL-1 antagonist, subcutaneous anakinra (100 mg daily) along with acitretin. One week later, after anakinra withdrawal, she presented a pustular psoriasis flare and a 7-day anakinra re-administration led to a satisfactory improvement in the skin lesions. We also reviewed the medical literature and found 28 case reports with pustular eruption after the COVID-19 vaccination. We compared the patients reported, regarding sex, age, number of doses, post-vaccination period and vaccine brand, and compared those results with our patient. Finally, as indicated by our case and other cases with similarly treated pustular eruptions. targeted therapy to this cytokine imbalance such as anakinra (IL-1) antagonist can improve the clinical course of the patient.

Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 vaccines: A review of case-report and case-series studies

BACKGROUND

There are multiple reviews on cardiovascular aspects of COVID-19 disease on cardiovascular system in different population but there is lack of evidence about cardiovascular adverse effects of COVID vaccines.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiac complications of COVID19 vaccines, based on vaccine type (mRNA, vector-based, and inactivated vaccines).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed covering PubMed for English case-reports and case-series studies, and finally 100 studies were included.

RESULTS

Myocarditis (with overall rate around 1.62%) was shown to be the most common post-COVID19 immunization cardiac event. More than 90% of post-COVID19 vaccination myocarditis occurred after receiving mRNA vaccines (Moderna & Pfizer-BioNTech), but the report of this event was less in the case of vector-based vaccinations and/or inactivated vaccines. Myocarditis was reported more commonly in men and following the second dose of the immunization. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) was reported after mRNA (more commonly) and vector-based vaccinations, with no case report after inactivated vaccines. When mRNA and vector-based vaccinations were used instead of inactivated vaccines, a greater frequency of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) and pulmonary emboli (PE) was reported. Myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest was recorded in those beyond the age of 75 years.

CONCLUSION

The personal and public health benefits of COVID-19 vaccination much outweigh the minor cardiac risks. Reporting bias, regarding more available mRNA vaccines in developed countries, may conflict these results.

COVID-19-Induced Myocarditis and mRNA Vaccine-Related Pericarditis: A Case Report

Acute inflammatory cardiac disease is an increasing cause of COVID-19 vaccine-induced complications. We report a case of acute pericarditis following the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) in a 49-year-old woman with previous COVID-19-induced myocarditis and heart failure. A clinical presentation compatible with acute decompensated heart failure elevated troponin levels and a cardiac-MRI showing myocardial fibrosis and inflammatory pericardial effusion led to the diagnosis of perimyocarditis. She was treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. Her condition improved in eight days. Physicians should be aware of the possible diagnosis of pericarditis and/or a myocardial injury after COVID-19 infection and vaccination.

Acute pericarditis in patients receiving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines: a case series from the community

BACKGROUND

International agencies reported that cases of pericarditis occur very rarely following the administration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Herewith, we described a series of patients from the community diagnosed with acute pericarditis after vaccination.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 28 patients (median age 51 years, 79% female) with or without a positive history of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 recovered infection who were diagnosed with acute pericarditis following the administration of COVID-19 vaccine. We excluded specific identifiable causes of pericarditis, including infectious, autoimmune, neoplastic and metabolic disease. Patients were referred for a complete cardiovascular evaluation. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed and diagnosis of acute pericarditis was achieved according to current guidelines.

RESULTS

There were 16 patients administered with Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine, 8 with Moderna/Spikevax vaccine and 4 with Astra Zeneca/Vaxzevria vaccine. Nine patients had been previously diagnosed with COVID-19, while the others had no prior history of COVID-19. Eleven patients had no comorbidity while the others had between one and four comorbidities. Ten patients had a history of rheumatic or autoimmune diseases. Chest pain was present in 24 patients. Minor ECG abnormalities were detected in 10 patients, T-wave inversion in 6, and 7 patients had concave ST elevation. The majority of patients showed mild pericardial effusions at TTE. Only two patients exhibited large pericardial effusions.

CONCLUSION

This case series shows a higher incidence of acute pericarditis in patients administered with COVID-19 vaccines than previously estimated, probably because of a more comprehensive assessment of clinical as well as echocardiographic parameters.

Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Cardiac Imaging Findings in 118 Studies

We reviewed the reported imaging findings of myocarditis in the literature following COVID-19 vaccination on cardiac imaging by a literature search in online databases, including Scopus, Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Embase (Elsevier), and Google Scholar. In total, 532 cases of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination were reported (462, 86.8% men and 70, 13.2% women, age range 12 to 80) with the following distribution: Pfizer-BioNTech: 367 (69%), Moderna: 137 (25.8%), AstraZeneca: 12 (2.3%), Janssen/Johnson & Johnson: 6 (1.1%), COVAXIN: 1 (0.1%), and unknown mRNA vaccine: 9 (1.7%). The distribution of patients receiving vaccine dosage was investigated. On cardiac MR Imaging, late intravenous gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was observed mainly in the epicardial/subepicardial segments (90.8%, 318 of 350 enhancing segments), with the dominance of inferolateral segment and inferior walls. Pericardial effusion was reported in 13.1% of cases. The vast majority of patients (94%, 500 of 532) were discharged from the hospital except for 4 (0.7%) cases. Post-COVID-19 myocarditis was most commonly reported in symptomatic men after the second or third dose, with CMRI findings including LGE in 90.8% of inferior and inferolateral epicardial/subepicardial segments. Most cases were self-limited.

Descriptive Study of Pericarditis Outcomes in Different Etiologies and Risk Factors: A Retrospective Record Review

Background: Pericarditis is an inflammatory pericardial disorder that can be caused by several infectious and non-infectious illnesses. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was recently added to the long list of pericarditis causes. As a result, this study aims to look at the incidence of various etiologies of pericarditis, including post-COVID-19 vaccine and risk factors, at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: Between 2012 and 2022, all male and female patients diagnosed with acute, chronic, or constrictive pericarditis at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital clinic were included in this retrospective study, which took place in June 2022. Data were collected from the hospital's medical records, including the patient's demographic information, pericarditis history, medical history, social background, laboratory tests, Echocardiogram (ECHO) and electrocardiogram (ECG) readings, and medication history. Associations were tested using univariate and bivariate analysis.

Results: Acute pericarditis was diagnosed in 59 (89.1%) patients and the most common symptoms were chest pain and shortness of breath (SOB) followed by fever and cough.Idiopathic pericarditis was the primary etiology 30 (46.9%) with male predominance 25 (55.6%), followed by infections and then cardiac presenting primarily with chest pain 25 (83.3%). In comparison, the most common presentation in females was autoimmune, as seen in eight patients (42.1%). Most patients required aspirin, ibuprofen, and colchicine. Among outcomes, of a total of 64 patients, five died within 30 days. Moreover, four (7.5%) experienced subsequent cardiac tamponades, which was mainly due to malignancy (50%) (p<0.05).

Conclusion: There was a substantial relationship between malignancy and developing morbid complications, with 59 patients out of 64 getting acute pericarditis and the remainder chronic and constrictive pericarditis with idiopathic pericarditis being the leading causes.

A Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting Acute Pericarditis by Electrocardiogram

(1) Background: Acute pericarditis is often confused with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) among patients presenting with acute chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Since a deep learning model (DLM) has been validated to accurately identify STEMI cases via 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), this study aimed to develop another DLM for the detection of acute pericarditis in the ED. (2) Methods: This study included 128 ECGs from patients with acute pericarditis and 66,633 ECGs from patients visiting the ED between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. The ECGs were randomly allocated based on patients to the training, tuning, and validation sets, at a 3:1:1 ratio. We used raw ECG signals to train a pericarditis-DLM and used traditional ECG features to train a machine learning model. A human–machine competition was conducted using a subset of the validation set, and the performance of the Philips automatic algorithm was also compared. STEMI cases in the validation set were extracted to analyze the DLM ability of differential diagnosis between acute pericarditis and STEMI using ECG. We also followed the hospitalization events in non-pericarditis cases to explore the meaning of false-positive predictions. (3) Results: The pericarditis-DLM exceeded the performance of all participating human experts and algorithms based on traditional ECG features in the human–machine competition. In the validation set, the pericarditis-DLM could detect acute pericarditis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.954, a sensitivity of 78.9%, and a specificity of 97.7%. However, our pericarditis-DLM also misinterpreted 10.2% of STEMI ECGs as pericarditis cases. Therefore, we generated an integrating strategy combining pericarditis-DLM and a previously developed STEMI-DLM, which provided a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 99.4%, to identify acute pericarditis in patients with chest pains. Compared to the true-negative cases, patients with false-positive results using this strategy were associated with higher risk of hospitalization within 3 days due to cardiac disorders (hazard ratio (HR): 8.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.99 to 16.39). (4) Conclusions: The AI-enhanced algorithm may be a powerful tool to assist clinicians in the early detection of acute pericarditis and differentiate it from STEMI using 12-lead ECGs.

Comparative assessment of myocarditis and pericarditis reporting rates related to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in Europe and the United States

OBJECTIVES

The novel mRNA vaccines proved to be safe and effective in averting severe COVID-19. Vaccine-related complications recorded by pharmacovigilance systems, such as "EudraVigilance" in Europe and "VAERS" in the United States (US), rarely include myocarditis and pericarditis. Given the novelty of the platform and the increasing global-scale vaccine production needs, we assessed their reporting rates comparatively across continents.

METHODS

Data of myocarditis and pericarditis cases post COVID-19 vaccination reported through week 40/2021 were collected for mRNA vaccines from EudraVigilance and VAERS. The corresponding administered vaccine doses were used as denominators to estimate reporting rates for comparison purposes.

RESULTS

Low reporting rates of myocarditis (7.64/million vaccine doses) and pericarditis (5.32/million) was found, with higher rates of both disorders in EudraVigilance compared to VAERS; these differences were more pronounced post mRNA-1273 (~5-fold) than post BNT162b2 vaccination (~1.5-fold). Most myocarditis cases occurred in males <30 years. Pericarditis affected predominantly males <40 and both sexes >40 years. The extremely rare fatalities related to myocarditis (0.102/million) or pericarditis (0.017/million) were also higher in EudraVigilance versus VAERS.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the underlying causes of the observed differences could provide guidance for the enhanced quality of mRNA vaccines that would foster vaccine acceptance.

Recurrent Pericarditis: a Stubborn Opponent Meets New Treatments in 2022

Purpose of Review

Our goal in writing this review was to provide a comprehensive appraisal of current therapies for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis with a particular focus on the newest therapeutic agents. We sought to understand the role of the inflammasome in the pathophysiology of pericarditis and how it informs the use of interleukin-1 (IL-1)-directed therapies.

Recent Findings

The latest research on this topic has focused on the critical role of the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein) inflammasome. Very recently, components of the NLRP3 inflammasome were detected by immune staining in pericardial tissue from patients with recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. In a mouse model of pericarditis, anti-IL-1 agents anakinra and rilonacept reduced NLRP3 immunostaining. Subsequent study of these drugs in human subjects with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis demonstrated their efficacy.

Summary

Recurrent idiopathic pericarditis, while relatively rare, poses a continued treatment challenge and contributes to a diminished quality of life for those patients who are afflicted. Recent developments, including an animal model of the disease and the use of IL-1-directed therapies, represent an exciting leap forward in our understanding of treatment targets. These advances offer not only new tools in our fight against this disease, but also the promise of earlier intervention and attenuation of disease morbidity. As our experience with these new agents expands, we can address questions about the ideal timing of introduction of anti-IL-1 therapy and duration of therapy and better understand the potential side effect profile.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01719-z.

Acute Pericarditis: Update

Purpose of Review

Since 2015, when ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases were published, ongoing research has enhanced the current state of knowledge on acute pericarditis. This review is an update on the latest developments in this field.

Recent Findings

In recurrent acute pericarditis, autoinflammation has been included among causative mechanisms restricting the vague diagnoses of “idiopathic” pericarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance that detects ongoing pericardial inflammation may guide treatment in difficult-to-treat patients. Development of risk scores may assist identification of patients at high risk for complicated pericarditis, who should be closely monitored and aggressively treated. Treatment with IL-1 inhibitors has been proven efficacious in recurrent forms with a good safety profile. Finally, acute pericarditis has recently attracted great interest as it has been reported among side effects post COVID-19 vaccination and may also complicate SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Summary

Recent advancements in acute pericarditis have contributed to a better understanding of the disease allowing a tailored to the individual patient approach. However, there are still unsolved questions that require further research.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11886-022-01710-8.

An Unusual Case Of Hemorrhagic Pleuropericarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination

As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are being increasingly administered worldwide, subsequent side effects, such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis, are becoming increasingly more common. Our case describes a 64-year-old male who developed chest pain and shortness of breath one week after receiving the Moderna (Cambridge, Massachusetts) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. He was found to have a large, left-sided pleural effusion and a small pericardial effusion. The patient underwent thoracentesis and video-assisted thoracoscopic procedure with chest tube placement, which drained bloody pleural and pericardial fluid. He was treated with a course of colchicine. Subsequent imaging revealed the resolution of pericardial and pleural effusions, along with the resolution of symptoms.

Chronic pericardial effusion: current concepts and emerging trends

INTRODUCTION

Pericardial effusion (PEF) is a common and challenging pericardial syndrome with a variety of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic, incidentally uncovered small PEFs, to life-threatening cardiac tamponade.

AREAS COVERED

: This review focuses on the pathophysiology, epidemiology, etiology, classification, clinical findings, diagnostic work-up, management and outcome of PEFs. Particular emphasis has been given on the most recent evidence concerning the contribution of imaging for the detection, differential diagnosis and evaluation of the hemodynamic impact of PEFs on the diastolic filling of the heart. Moreover, simplified algorithms for PEF triage and management have been included.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of patients with PEFs is mainly based on four parameters namely hemodynamic impact on diastolic function, elevation of inflammatory markers, presence of a specific underlying condition known to be associated with PEF and finally size and duration of the effusion. Novel data have contributed to change our view towards large, asymptomatic, "idiopathic" PEFs and dictated a rather conservative approach in most cases. It is also stressed that there is a compelling need for additional research, which is essential for tailored treatments aiming at the improvement of quality of life and containment of health care costs.

A case of an elderly female who developed subacute pleuropericarditis following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination

Despite the established safety of BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, some rare but serious complications have been previously reported. Here, we report a rare case of an elderly female who developed subacute pleuropericarditis after the vaccination. An 88-year-old female experienced weight gain and dyspnea three days after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccination, and one month later, presented to our hospital due to the exacerbation of the symptoms. Computed tomography showed remarkable pericardial and bilateral pleural effusions, and transthoracic echocardiogram visualized collapse signs of right and left atrium which indicates pre-tamponade. Percutaneous drainages of pericardial and pleural effusions stabilized her vital condition and revealed that all of them were exudative, indicating the presence of pleuropericarditis. Finally, we diagnosed this case as COVID-19 vaccine-associated pleuropericarditis because there were no signs of bacterial/viral infection or any other relevant causes except for the vaccination. When the pericardial and pleural effusions are concurrently found after COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine-associated pleuropericarditis should be considered as a differential diagnosis. The aggressive drainage of pericardial and pleural effusions could be helpful not only for diagnosis but also for treatment in the clinical management of COVID-19 vaccine-associated pleuropericarditis.

Learning objective

Although the safety and efficacy of BNT162b2 have been widely accepted, it is clinically important to know the potential risk of side effects. When the pericardial and pleural effusions are concurrently found after the vaccination, coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine-associated pleuropericarditis should be considered as a differential diagnosis.

Rapid resolution of severe pericardial effusion using anakinra in a patient with COVID-19 vaccine-related acute pericarditis relapse: a case report

Background

Pericarditis, along with myocarditis, is being increasingly reported after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, but the best treatment strategy in this specific setting is still unclear.

Case summary

We report a case of acute pericarditis after the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine with recurrence of large pericardial effusion after a previous pericardiocentesis and anti-inflammatory drugs tapering. The patient was successfully treated with the recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra, with full reabsorption of the pericardial effusion and an abrupt drop of the inflammatory markers within 72 h. The patient was discharged a few days later, with a further decrease of the inflammatory markers and no residual symptoms.

Discussion

Anakinra is being increasingly used in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis due to its capability to interrupt the autoinflammatory response leading to deleterious cytokine storms. On account of its high efficacy and rapid onset, it has been reported to rapidly reverse large inflammatory pericardial effusions. Pericarditis and myocarditis have been reported after the COVID-19 vaccine, but this is the first case of COVID-19 vaccine-related pericarditis and pericardial effusion successfully treated with anakinra, avoiding a second pericardiocentesis.

Temporal relationship of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination: A pragmatic approach

Background

Complications following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly with mRNA vaccines, rarely include myocarditis and pericarditis. This work principally aimed at defining a realistic temporal relationship between vaccination and myocarditis/pericarditis development.

Methods

All relevant cases reported from week 52/2020 through week 41/2021 in the VAERS database were retrieved and analyzed for licensed vaccines. These included BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and AD26.COV2·S. Incidence rates were calculated using the corresponding administered vaccine doses as denominators. Additionally, analyzed parameters included demographics, dose series, hospitalization length and outcome.

Results

Overall, 2016 myocarditis and 1380 pericarditis cases, (4.96/10⁶ and 3.40/10⁶ administered vaccine doses, respectively), were recorded. Most myocarditis cases occurred following BNT162b2 (5.60/10⁶ doses) in males <30 years. Pericarditis affected predominantly males <40, both sexes >40 years, and was most common post AD26.COV2·S (4.78/10⁶ doses). Hospitalization was required for 40.3% and 27.2% of myocarditis and pericarditis cases, respectively. A bimodal pattern was found for both myocarditis and pericarditis, with two peaks that coincided temporally, but were reversed in intensity. The first peak was recorded 1–3 days post-vaccination and was more pronounced in myocarditis, while the second was recorded 15–30 days post-vaccination and was more intense in pericarditis.

Conclusions

Myocarditis/pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and depicts a bimodal pattern.

A Case of Acute Viral Pericarditis Complicated With Pericardial Effusion Induced by Third Dose of COVID Vaccination

COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious in clinical trials. A two-dose regimen of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine confers no less than 95% protection against COVID-19 with an adequate safety profile. To date, no reports have been made in the literature regarding the onset of acute viral pericarditis after vaccination with the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. But on the other hand, pericarditis is reported to occur in rare instances of COVID-19 infection, and this may be attributed to the pro-inflammatory effects of the spike protein. In this article, we describe the case of an elderly male patient with a known case of hypothyroidism who presented to our emergency department with fever, chills, and dry cough for ten days after the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Although we cannot mention a direct effect, it is essential to note a potential adverse reaction to vaccine administration following the expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-induced from the vaccine’s mRNA.

Cardiomyopathy Associated with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: What Do We Know?

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has mobilized many efforts worldwide to curb its impact on morbidity and mortality. Vaccination of the general population has resulted in the administration of more than 6,700,000,000 doses by the end of October 2021, which is the most effective method to prevent hospitalization and death. Among the adverse effects described, myocarditis and pericarditis are low-frequency events (less than 10 per 100,000 people), mainly observed with messenger RNA vaccines. The mechanisms responsible for these effects have not been specified, considering an exacerbated and uncontrolled immune response and an autoimmune response against specific cardiomyocyte proteins. This greater immunogenicity and reactogenicity is clinically manifested in a differential manner in pediatric patients, adults, and the elderly, determining specific characteristics of its presentation for each age group. It generally develops as a condition of mild to moderate severity, whose symptoms and imaging findings are self-limited, resolving favorably in days to weeks and, exceptionally, reporting deaths associated with this complication. The short- and medium-term prognosis is favorable, highlighting the lack of data on long-term evolution, which should be determined in longer follow-ups.