Fourteen years of the Pregnancy Registry on maternal immunisation with a reduced-antigen-content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

Timing of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: Evidence and implementation - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy has been introduced in an increasing number of countries to better protect infants against the disease in their first weeks of life. The optimal timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is however still under debate.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed published literature on safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy related to timing of vaccination. The search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science and yielded 1623 articles, thereof 777 duplicates. Screening resulted in the inclusion of 45 publications reporting on safety (n = 11), immunogenicity (n = 26) and/or effectiveness (n = 9). We also mapped pertussis recommendations in pregnancy by government institutions globally according to the recommended timing of vaccination.

RESULTS

Overall, the selected publications did not indicate increased safety concerns associated with timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. Immunogenicity studies often suggested optimal protection at birth after early third trimester vaccination. Few studies investigated qualitative antibody characteristics, and none investigated antibody titers in breastmilk or cellular-mediated immunity related to timing of vaccination. Effectiveness studies showed decreased vaccine effectiveness of late third trimester pertussis vaccination compared to vaccination earlier in pregnancy. Worldwide, a general recommendation for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was found for 58 countries, with as many as 22 different recommended timings registered.

CONCLUSION

The timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy seems to impact immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness, with optimal immune responses at birth suggested following early third trimester vaccination and reduced vaccine effectiveness of late third trimester pertussis vaccination suggested compared to vaccination earlier in pregnancy. However, inconsistent and lacking data are reflected in the divergent national recommendations for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy worldwide.

SUMMARY

Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy aims to protect infants in their first weeks of life. Our review suggests that immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness are impacted by the timing of vaccination in pregnancy. National recommendations for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy vary widely worldwide.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion Maternal Vaccine Coadministered With Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine: A Phase 2 Study

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion protein stabilized in the prefusion conformation (RSVPreF3) was under investigation as a maternal vaccine.

METHODS

This phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose, multicenter study enrolled healthy, nonpregnant women, randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to 5 parallel groups studying RSVPreF3 (60 or 120 µg) coadministered with diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (dTpa) or placebo, and dTpa coadministered with placebo. Safety and humoral immune responses were assessed. An extension phase also assessed a RSVPreF3 120 μg vaccination 12-18 months after first vaccination.

RESULTS

The safety profile of RSVPreF3 was unaffected by dose or dTpa coadministration. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were evenly distributed across study groups. Injection-site pain was higher following the second vaccination versus the first vaccination. Medically attended AEs were rare (<5% overall). Both RSVPreF3 dose levels (alone and with dTpa) were immunogenic, increasing levels of RSV-A neutralizing antibody ≥8-fold and anti-RSVPreF3 IgG antibody ≥11-fold at 1 month postvaccination, which persisted at 12-18 months postvaccination; modest 2-fold increases were observed with a second RSVPreF3 vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates RSVPreF3 coadministration with dTpa induces robust immune responses and is well tolerated, regardless of the RSVPreF3 dose level used.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04138056.

Improving Tdap maternal immunization rate in Saudi Arabia

Pertussis is a serious and potentially fatal disease in infants too young for vaccination. Despite a high vaccine coverage in children, pertussis continues to occur in unvaccinated infants in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Available data supports the use of maternal pertussis immunization for preventing pertussis in young infants. In June 2019, the Saudi Ministry of Health recommended maternal pertussis immunization with combined tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) during every pregnancy. To understand barriers to maternal immunization and identify strategies to improve maternal immunization, we conducted an online survey in November and December 2020, asking 60 obstetricians/gynecologists about their attitudes to maternal pertussis immunization. Fewer than 50% survey respondents considered maternal immunization as part of their role, and only 47% were aware of the national recommendation. Consequently, the uptake of maternal vaccination in KSA may be sub-optimal. The key barriers that hinder obstetricians/gynecologists from recommending maternal Tdap immunization were the anticipation of patient refusal, and their own need for more information/experience about the disease and the national recommendation. Vaccine availability and supply were important barriers, whereas cost/reimbursement and resource issues were of lesser concern. Disseminating evidence based information to physicians, educating pregnant women and addressing public misconceptions.

Maternal vaccination-current status, challenges, and opportunities

AIM

Maternal vaccination is a promising strategy for protecting pregnant women and newborns against severe infections. This review aims to describe the current status and challenges associated with maternal vaccination against seasonal influenza, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap/DTaP), and novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan and other countries, mainly the United States and the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and other public websites (e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to obtain information on maternal vaccination.

RESULTS

Inactivated vaccines are recommended for pregnant women by gynecologic societies in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Among pregnant Japanese women, the influenza and COVID-19 (two doses) vaccine coverage rates were 27.0%-53.5% (six studies) and 73.6% (one study), respectively; there are no studies on maternal vaccination with DTaP. Concerns regarding vaccine safety are a major barrier to maternal vaccination across countries. Maternal vaccination is effective in preventing severe disease in pregnant women and protecting infants aged <6 months, is generally safe, and does not increase the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Providing accurate information regarding vaccination through healthcare providers and the government and government funding for vaccines may help improve maternal vaccination rates in Japan.

CONCLUSION

Current coverage for maternal vaccination is still low globally mainly because of vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women. The government, drug-regulatory authorities, and healthcare professionals must educate pregnant women about the effectiveness and safety of maternal vaccines and encourage vaccination when the benefits outweigh the risks.