1
|
Burns S, Bhoyroo R, Leavy JE, Portsmouth L, Millar L, Jancey J, Hendriks J, Saltis H, Tohotoa J, Pollard C. The Impact of the No Jab No Play and No Jab No Pay Legislation in Australia: A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6219. [PMID: 37444067 PMCID: PMC10341108 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20136219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Australia has a long history of population-based immunisation programs including legislations. This paper reports on a review of evaluations of the impact of the federal No Jab No Pay (NJNPay) and state implemented No Jab No Play (NJNPlay) legislations on childhood immunisation coverage and related parental attitudes. Five databases were searched for peer-review papers (Medline (Ovid); Scopus; PsycInfo; ProQuest; and CINAHL). Additional searches were conducted in Google Scholar and Informit (Australian databases) for grey literature. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact of the Australian NJNPay and/or NJNPlay legislations. Ten evaluations were included: nine peer-review studies and one government report. Two studies specifically evaluated NJNPlay, five evaluated NJNPay, and three evaluated both legislations. Findings show small but gradual and significant increases in full coverage and increases in catch-up vaccination after the implementation of the legislations. Full coverage was lowest for lower and higher socio-economic groups. Mandates are influential in encouraging vaccination; however, inequities may exist for lower income families who are reliant on financial incentives and the need to enrol their children in early childhood centres. Vaccine refusal and hesitancy was more evident among higher income parents while practical barriers were more likely to impact lower income families. Interventions to address access and vaccine hesitancy will support these legislations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharyn Burns
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Ranila Bhoyroo
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Justine E. Leavy
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Linda Portsmouth
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Lynne Millar
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Jonine Jancey
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Hendriks
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Hanna Saltis
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Jenny Tohotoa
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Christina Pollard
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Consolidating a research agenda for vaccine mandates. Vaccine 2022; 40:7353-7359. [PMID: 36396514 PMCID: PMC9662755 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A workshop on mandatory vaccination was pitched to the World Public Health Congress in 2019 and the resultant special issue was pitched to Vaccine in 2020. During this project, the COVID-19 pandemic pushed vaccine policy to the forefront of global public health policy, and the imposition of vaccine mandates prompted a new wave of scholarship in the field. This introductory article employs the heuristic of Lasswell's (1956) policy cycle to synthesise the findings of the articles in the special issue. It considers the temporal lifetime of mandates and highlights findings regarding: the emergence of mandates as a policy option, public support and policy instrument design, what matters in the implementation of mandates, and what we can learn from evaluating them. The second half of the paper categorizes the included papers in terms of what aspects of mandates they study and the methods they employ to do so, in order to formulate a guide for future researchers of vaccine mandates. Scholars study either speculative or existing mandates - research can address several stages of the policy cycle or just one of them, ranging from attitudinal research to implementation studies and impact studies. Historical and contextual studies that take deep dives into a particular mandate are a much needed resource for studying emerging mandates, too, and scoping and framework- building work will undoubtedly be valuable in understanding and appreciating the wealth of knowledge production in this growing field. This special issue can serve as a roadmap for a consolidation of this interdisciplinary research agenda, and provide a helpful resource for decisionmakers at this historical juncture.
Collapse
|