1
|
Dalky A, Quran TO, Abuhammad S, Al-Faraj HM, Bani Hani S, ALBashtawy M, Abu Khader IR, Jallad M, Salameh B. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and associated factors among pregnant and lactating women attending maternity care clinics in refugee camps in Jordan. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305314. [PMID: 38861556 PMCID: PMC11166341 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the advantages of vaccination in preventing maternal and fetal problems, there were many concerns in the medical community regarding vaccine safety for pregnant women, and this has put obstetricians in a challenging situation when it comes to advising their pregnant patients on whether to obtain the vaccine. AIM This study was performed to define the level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination and assess the impact of COVID-19 attitudes and knowledge on vaccine acceptance between pregnant and lactating Syrian women who are seeking prenatal care services at the clinics in Azraq refugee camp in Jordan. METHOD A quantitative, cross-sectional study utilizing a non-probability convenience sample. A validated and reliable self-administered questionnaire consisting of four sections was used. RESULTS A total of 412 pregnant/lactating women was recruited The acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among participants was 86.5%. There was a significant positive moderate association between respondents' attitudes and knowledge around the COVID-19 vaccine and their acceptance of the vaccine (r = .468, p < .001, r = .357, p < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION To effectively mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic and achieve collective protection, decision-makers must intensify the efforts in promoting the importance of maternal vaccination, especially in vulnerable communities that suffer the most from pandemic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa Dalky
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Management and Policy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, Jordan
| | | | - Sawsan Abuhammad
- Faculty of Nursing, Department of Maternal and Child Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Haneen Mahyoub Al-Faraj
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health Management and Policy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Salam Bani Hani
- Faculty of Nursing, Nursing Department, Irbid National University, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Mohammed ALBashtawy
- Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Department of Community and Mental Health, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan
| | | | - Mohammed Jallad
- Faculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine
| | - Basma Salameh
- Faculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aggarwal S, Singh L, Alam U, Sharma S, Saroj SK, Zaman K, Usman M, Kant R, Chaturvedi HK. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among adults in India: A primary study based on health behavior theories and 5C psychological antecedents model. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0294480. [PMID: 38722922 PMCID: PMC11081298 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the significant success of India's COVID-19 vaccination program, a sizeable proportion of the adult population remains unvaccinated or has received a single dose of the vaccine. Despite the recommendations of the Government of India for the two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and the precautionary booster dose, many people were still hesitant towards the COVID-19 full vaccination. Hence, this study aimed to identify the primary behavioral and psychological factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy. Cross-sectional data was collected via a multi-stage sampling design by using a scheduled sample survey in the Gorakhpur district of Uttar Pradesh, India, between 15 July 2022 to 30 September 2022. This study has utilized three health behavior models-the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the 5C Psychological Antecedents of vaccination, and employed bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression model to assess the level of vaccine hesitancy and predictive health behavior of the respondents. Results indicate that among the constructs of the HBM and 5C Antecedents models, "perceived benefits", "confidence" and "collective responsibility" showed a lesser likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. However, in the TPB model constructs, a 'negative attitude towards the vaccine' showed a four times higher likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. From the future policy perspective, this study suggested that addressing the issue of 'negative attitudes towards the vaccine' and increasing the trust or confidence for the vaccine through increasing awareness about the benefits of the vaccination in India may reduce vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Aggarwal
- Indian Council of Medical Research- Headquarters (ICMR-Hqrs), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Lucky Singh
- ICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Umaer Alam
- ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Saurabh Sharma
- ICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Shashi Kala Saroj
- ICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Kamran Zaman
- ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
- ICMR-National Institute of Traditional Medicine (ICMR-NITM), Belagavi Karnataka, India
| | - Mohd Usman
- ICMR- National Institute of Medical Statistics (ICMR-NIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajni Kant
- ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biasio LR, Zanobini P, Lorini C, Bonaccorsi G. Perspectives in the Development of Tools to Assess Vaccine Literacy. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:422. [PMID: 38675804 PMCID: PMC11054371 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12040422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccine literacy (VL) is the ability to find, understand, and evaluate vaccination-related information to make appropriate decisions about immunization. The tools developed so far for its evaluation have produced consistent results. However, some dimensions may be underestimated due to the complexity of factors influencing VL. Moreover, the heterogeneity of methods used in studies employing these tools hinders a comprehensive understanding of its role even more. To overcome these limitations, a path has been sought to propose new instruments. This has necessitated updating earlier literature reviews on VL and related tools, exploring its relationship with vaccine hesitancy (VH), and examining associated variables like beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors towards immunization. Based on the current literature, and supported by the re-analysis of a dataset from an earlier study, we propose a theoretical framework to serve as the foundation for creating future assessment tools. These instruments should not only evaluate the psychological factors underlying the motivational aspect of VL, but also encompass knowledge and competencies. The positioning of VL in the framework at the intersection between sociodemographic antecedents and attitudes, leading to behaviors and outcomes, explains why and how VL can directly or indirectly influence vaccination decisions by countering VH and operating at personal, as well as at organizational and community levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrizio Zanobini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (P.Z.); (C.L.); (G.B.)
| | - Chiara Lorini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (P.Z.); (C.L.); (G.B.)
| | - Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (P.Z.); (C.L.); (G.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luisi M, Geana MV, Pei J. Pandemic antecedents - Exploring predictivity and relationships between COVID-19 vaccine uptake and influenza, shingles, and HPV vaccination. Vaccine 2024; 42:2455-2462. [PMID: 38461049 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A wealth of extant research focuses on identifying barriers to, and predictors of, COVID-19 vaccination. In addition to treating COVID-19 vaccination and related experiences as antecedents, this study analyzes the relationships between COVID-19 vaccination experiences and intent to receive the flu, shingles, and HPV vaccines. METHOD Analyses were performed on the responses from U.S. survey panel of 1,024 participants (n = 1,024), 530 (51.8 %) who received at least a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and 494 (48.2 %) who had not. Descriptive and inferential statistics identify participant demographic characteristics, prior vaccination behavior, vaccination intentions, risk behavior assessment, vaccination attitudes and beliefs, and the predictivity of COVID-19 vaccination, when treated as an antecedent. RESULTS Receiving a first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine interacted with receiving a past influenza vaccine, predicting the future intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine or booster. Vaccine hesitancy in parents is significantly related to vaccination behaviors for themselves and their children. Analyses also showed differences between the vaccinated group (VG) and the unvaccinated group (UVG) on hesitancy, beliefs, and attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION Experience with COVID-19 vaccination and the relationship of those experiences with other vaccinations provide useful insight on leveraging vaccine uptake. Healthcare professionals should improve the COVID-19 vaccination experience and use vaccination appointments to promote other vaccinations. Research should continue to compare vaccination experiences and how they may persuade or dissuade vaccination intent for other vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Luisi
- School of Journalism, University of Missouri, 178 Gannett Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
| | - Mugur V Geana
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Suite 2001, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
| | - Jun Pei
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Suite 2001, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Che Mood NA, Mat Yudin Z, Ahmad WMAW, Abdul Kadir A, Norhayati MN, Md Nawawi NH, Mohamad Zon E, Ali N. Validation of the questionnaire "Pregnancy Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (pVHS)" toward COVID-19 vaccine for Malaysian pregnant women. PeerJ 2024; 12:e17134. [PMID: 38549778 PMCID: PMC10977085 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnancy is one of the risks for severe COVID-19 infection, and receiving a vaccination is one of the effective methods to reduce disease severity. However, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women remains an issue. This study aims to develop and validate the pregnancy Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (pVHS) toward COVID-19 vaccine for Malaysian pregnant women. Method An 8-item Malay language pregnancy Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (pVHS-M) for COVID-19 was adapted from the adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale and validated using Exploratory Factor Analysis. Six expert panels were involved in content validity, and ten pregnant women were involved in face validity. A cross-sectional study on 200 pregnant women was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan. Result The item-level content validity index is 1.00, demonstrating good relevance of the eight items used to assess COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The item-level face validity index obtained is 0.99, indicating that the items were clear and comprehensible. The Cronbach alpha score was 0.944, with factor loadings ranging from 0.79 to 0.89. Conclusion The pVHS-M demonstrated good internal consistency, indicating that it is a valid and reliable tool for assessing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Azreen Che Mood
- School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Zainab Mat Yudin
- School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad
- School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Azidah Abdul Kadir
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Noor Norhayati
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Noorfaizahtul Hanim Md Nawawi
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Erinna Mohamad Zon
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Norsiah Ali
- Masjid Tanah Health Clinic, Masjid Tanah, Melaka, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Biasio LR, Zanobini P, Lorini C, Monaci P, Fanfani A, Gallinoro V, Cerini G, Albora G, Del Riccio M, Pecorelli S, Bonaccorsi G. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2176083. [PMID: 36794338 PMCID: PMC10026896 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles published between January 2020 and October 2022: 26 papers were identified using these tools in the context of COVID-19. Descriptive analysis showed that the levels of VL observed in the studies were generally in agreement, with functional VL score often lower than the interactive-critical dimension, as if the latter was stimulated by the COVID-19-related infodemic. Factors associated with VL included vaccination status, age, educational level, and, possibly, gender. Effective communication based on VL when promoting vaccination is critical to sustaining immunization against COVID-19 and other communicable diseases. The VL scales developed to date have shown good consistency. However, further research is needed to improve these tools and develop new ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrizio Zanobini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Lorini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Monaci
- Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alice Fanfani
- Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Veronica Gallinoro
- Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Cerini
- Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Albora
- Medical Specialization School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Del Riccio
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Pecorelli
- Scientific Advisory Committee, Giovanni Lorenzini Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lu Y, Wang Q, Zhu S, Xu S, Kadirhaz M, Zhang Y, Zhao N, Fang Y, Chang J. Lessons learned from COVID-19 vaccination implementation: How psychological antecedents of vaccinations mediate the relationship between vaccine literacy and vaccine hesitancy. Soc Sci Med 2023; 336:116270. [PMID: 37778145 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhancing the public's vaccine literacy is critical for curbing vaccine hesitancy and enhancing society's pandemic preparedness, particularly in an era of infodemic. Evidence on vaccine literacy as an influencing factor of hesitancy is scarce. Lessons could be learned from COVID-19 vaccination implementation. Taking the COVID-19 vaccines as an example, the current study aimed to examine the relationship between vaccine literacy and hesitancy and the mediating role of psychological antecedents of vaccination on the relationship. METHODS A baseline online questionnaire survey among the general public in China based on quota sampling was conducted in April 2021 to measure participants' vaccine literacy, psychological antecedents of vaccination, COVID-19 vaccination status, and vaccine hesitancy. A follow-up online survey tracked the updated COVID-19 vaccination status among those who hadn't taken COVID-19 vaccines at the baseline survey. Structural equation modeling has been applied to examine the direct and indirect effect of vaccine literacy on vaccine hesitancy. Time-to-event analysis was used to explore the effect of vaccine hesitancy on vaccination behavior. RESULTS Lower vaccine hesitancy was associated with higher vaccine literacy. The "3Cs" psychological antecedents were important mediators between vaccine literacy and vaccine hesitancy. The pathway between critical/interactive vaccine literacy and vaccine hesitancy through the "3Cs" psychological antecedents played a more important role. Time-to-event analysis showed participants with a higher vaccine hesitancy were prone to have a longer delay in vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Improving the public's ability to obtain and evaluate vaccination information can fix the public's psychological determinants of vaccination, reducing vaccine hesitancy and promoting vaccination. Governments need to put more effort into guiding and regulating the media to disseminate evidence-based information, rectifying misinformation, and improving the public's vaccine literacy through education, especially the public's capability to critically discern mixed information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunshu Lu
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China
| | - Quanfang Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Shan Zhu
- Xi'an Municipal Health Commission, Xi'an, China
| | - Sen Xu
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China
| | - Muhtar Kadirhaz
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China
| | - Yushan Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China
| | - Nan Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China
| | - Yu Fang
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China
| | - Jie Chang
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Center for Drug Safety and Policy Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Shaanxi Center for Health Reform and Development Research, Xi'an, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bellomo RK, Cerabona V, Massimi A, Migliara G, Sparano M, Novello F, Schilirò T, Siliquini R, Villari P, De Vito C. Who chooses alternative sources of information about childhood vaccinations? A cross-sectional study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1225761. [PMID: 37771825 PMCID: PMC10525346 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1225761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Vaccine hesitancy can lead to problematic outcomes in terms of public health. A factor playing a fundamental role in this dynamic is the source of information considered by parents in the decision-making progress that leads to the acceptance or refusal of childhood vaccinations. This study aims to investigate the sources of information considered by the parents of children attending primary and secondary schools in two large Italian cities and to identify predictors that led to choosing alternative sources of information. Methods An online questionnaire was administered to the parents of students attending elementary, middle, and high schools in Rome and Turin. Two validated tools were used: the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines Survey and the Vaccine Health Literacy of adults in Italian. Sources of information about vaccinations, trust toward the healthcare system, hesitancy and attitudes about COVID-19 vaccinations, were also investigated. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of the preferred sources of information on the topic. Results Totally, 2,301 answers to the survey were collected from June to October 2021. Of these, 1,127 came from parents in Rome (49%) and 1,174 from parents based in Turin (51%) with a mean age of 47.7 years (±6.4). The majority of the respondents were mothers (81%), married (73%), with two or more children (70.5%). The multivariable logistic regression model results showed that fathers were more inclined than mothers to use alternative sources of information (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.29-2.00). Moreover, a higher level of vaccine hesitancy was a strong predictor for choosing alternative sources of information (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.73-3.46). The HLVa-it scores show that parents with a lower Vaccine Literacy (VL) were more inclined to use alternative sources of information. Discussion Addressing health literacy issues and changing the official forms of communication could help improving vaccine acceptance. This study shows the importance of rebuilding a trusting relationship between patients and health care providers, which is fundamental in the fight against vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Katia Bellomo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Cerabona
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Azzurra Massimi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Sparano
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Tiziana Schilirò
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Siliquini
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wen J, Du X, Li A, Zhang S, Shen S, Zhang Z, Yang L, Sun C, Li J, Zhu S. Dilemmas and options for COVID-19 vaccination in children. Ital J Pediatr 2023; 49:103. [PMID: 37620892 PMCID: PMC10464401 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-023-01513-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 16 million children have been detected positive for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States since the outbreak of the pandemic. In general, children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 tend to have lighter symptoms than adults. However, in some cases, the infection can develop into severe forms, such as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Moreover, long-term public health preventive interventions have had some negative effects on the physical and mental health of children. Given the important role that vaccination plays in reducing severe illness and mortality, it is essential for the efficient implementation of vaccination in the pediatric population. Nevertheless, parental distrust of vaccination, especially with regard to its safety and efficacy, hinders this process. Herein, we comprehensively summarize the available data on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in children. The results show that the currently approved COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective for children. Although two doses of vaccine in children seem insufficient to prevent Omicron infection, the booster dose provides enhanced protection against infection and severe illness. Most importantly, the bivalent vaccine has been approved for use in the pediatric population to extend the immune response to currently circulating Omicron variant. And the immune protection afforded to newborns after maternal vaccination appears to last only 6 months. Therefore, in the current situation where the rate of virus mutation is accelerating and the COVID-19 pandemic is still severe, it is crucial to extend vaccine protection to children over 6 months of age to weave a tighter safety net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingzhi Wen
- Department of Paediatrics, Yantai Yeda Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, 264006, China
| | - Xiaoan Du
- Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
| | - Adan Li
- Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
| | - Shungeng Zhang
- Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
| | - Shengyun Shen
- Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
| | - Ziteng Zhang
- Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
| | - Liyuan Yang
- Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, 272067, China
| | - Changqing Sun
- Department of Paediatrics, Yantai Yeda Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, 264006, China
| | - Jianing Li
- Department of Paediatrics, Yantai Yeda Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, 264006, China.
| | - Shiheng Zhu
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lorini C, Del Riccio M, Zanobini P, Biasio RL, Bonanni P, Giorgetti D, Ferro VA, Guazzini A, Maghrebi O, Lastrucci V, Rigon L, Okan O, Sørensen K, Bonaccorsi G. Vaccination as a social practice: towards a definition of personal, community, population, and organizational vaccine literacy. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1501. [PMID: 37553624 PMCID: PMC10408168 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16437-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A comprehensive and agreed-upon definition of vaccine literacy (VL) could support the understanding of vaccination and help policy-makers and individuals make informed decisions about vaccines. METHODS To shed some light on this debate and provide clarity, a scoping review was conducted to collect, summarize, and analyse available definitions of VL. Based on the findings of the scoping review, a new and comprehensive definition was proposed by a panel of experts. RESULTS Fifty-three articles were included, and two of them appeared to be the milestones around which the other definitions were grouped. The new definition proposed by the panel of experts included not only the personal perspective, but also the community, population, and organizational perspectives. Moreover, due to the increasing complexity of the social context with respect to the ability to navigate, understand, and use information and services, the definition of organizational vaccine literacy and the attributes of a vaccine literate healthcare organization have been proposed. CONCLUSION The new definition can contribute to the overall paradigm of health literacy and its distinct component of vaccine literacy, possibly improving the implementation of public health strategies to allow vaccination to be understood as a social practice by the entire community. This study describes the conceptual foundations, the competencies, and the civic orientation to be considered when developing measurement tools devoted to assessing VL at the different levels and in different contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lorini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy.
- Health Literacy Laboratory (HeLiLab), University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marco Del Riccio
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Patrizio Zanobini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Health Literacy Laboratory (HeLiLab), University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Duccio Giorgetti
- Medical School of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Giovanni Alessandro Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Valerio Allodola Ferro
- Department of Law, Economics and Human Sciences, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Via Dell'Università 25, 89124, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Andrea Guazzini
- Department of Education, Literatures, Intercultural Studies, Languages and Psychology, University of Florence, Via Di San Salvi 12, 50135, Florence, Italy
| | - Olfa Maghrebi
- Department of Education, Literatures, Intercultural Studies, Languages and Psychology, University of Florence, Via Di San Salvi 12, 50135, Florence, Italy
| | - Vieri Lastrucci
- Epidemiology Unit, Meyer's Children University Hospital, Viale Gaetano Pieraccini, 24, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Lisa Rigon
- Medical School of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Giovanni Alessandro Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Orkan Okan
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Kristine Sørensen
- Global Health Literacy Academy, Viengevej 100, 8240, Risskov, Denmark
| | - Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Health Literacy Laboratory (HeLiLab), University of Florence, Viale Giovanni Battista Morgagni 48, 50134, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bruno S, Nachira L, Arcaro P, Pattavina F, Campo E, Cadeddu C, Carducci B, Lanzone A, Damiani G, Laurenti P. Assessing Doubts, Knowledge, and Service Appreciation among Pregnant Women Who Received the COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Research Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040812. [PMID: 37112724 PMCID: PMC10143795 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is considered one of the deadliest pandemics in history. Pregnant women are more susceptible to developing serious diseases during COVID-19 than their non-pregnant peers. Pregnant women often express doubt about accepting the vaccination, especially in regard to their security and safety. This study aims to investigate the appreciation of the vaccination offer, and if there are any determinants impacting vaccine hesitancy. A questionnaire was administered to a sample of pregnant women who had just received their immunization against COVID-19 at the vaccination service of a teaching hospital in Rome, from October 2021 to March 2022. A high appreciation of the vaccination services was found, both for the logistic organization and the healthcare personnel, with mean scores above 4 out of 5. The degree of pre-vaccinal doubt was low (41%) or medium (48%) for the largest part of the sample, while the degree of COVID-19 vaccine knowledge was high for 91% of the participants. Physicians were the most decisive information source for the vaccination choice. Our results highlighted that a supportive approach could increase appreciation and improve the setting of vaccinations. Healthcare professionals should aim for a more comprehensive and integrated role of all figures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Bruno
- Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Nachira
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Arcaro
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pattavina
- Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrica Campo
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Cadeddu
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Brigida Carducci
- Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Lanzone
- Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Damiani
- Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Laurenti
- Women, Children and Public Health Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Keselman A, Arnott Smith C, Wilson AJ, Leroy G, Kaufman DR. Cognitive and Cultural Factors That Affect General Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 11:vaccines11010094. [PMID: 36679939 PMCID: PMC9865922 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of COVID-19 vaccines is a major scientific accomplishment that has armed communities worldwide with powerful epidemic control tools. Yet, COVID-19 vaccination efforts in the US have been marred by persistent vaccine hesitancy. We used survey methodology to explore the impact of different cognitive and cultural factors on the public's general vaccination attitudes, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccination status. The factors include information literacy, science literacy, attitudes towards science, interpersonal trust, public health trust, political ideology, and religiosity. The analysis suggests that attitudes towards vaccination are influenced by a multitude of factors that operate in a complex manner. General vaccination attitude was most affected by attitudes towards science and public health trust and to a lesser degree by information literacy, science literacy, and religiosity. Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines were most affected by public health trust and to a lesser extent by general trust, ideology and attitudes towards science. Vaccination status was most influenced by public health trust. Possible mediating effects of correlated variables in the model need to be further explored. The study underscores the importance of understanding the relationship between public health trust, literacies, and sociocultural factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alla Keselman
- National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-301-827-5671
| | | | - Amanda J. Wilson
- National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Gondy Leroy
- Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
| | - David R. Kaufman
- Medical Informatics Program, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| |
Collapse
|