Challenges and opportunities in developing a Shigella-containing combination vaccine for children in low- and middle-income countries: Report of an expert convening

Conserved antigens for enteric vaccines

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), Shigella, and Campylobacter have been identified as major causes of diarrheal diseases worldwide. In addition to overt disease and death, they are responsible for stunting in children with the risk of lifelong consequences on health and economic opportunities. All three of these bacterial pathogens, which collectively account for approximately 30 % of the cases of diarrheal diseases, are recognized as antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threats. In spite of the dangers these pathogens represent for both children and adults, there is as yet no licensed vaccine available for any of them. Fortunately, much has been accomplished to identify conserved antigens against each of these pathogens so that now relatively simple vaccines have the potential to be developed into multi-pathogen vaccines which could have a major impact on reduction of diarrheal diseases. Conserved antigens may be used even more efficiently if consolidated and expressed on a cellular vector or as part of a conjugate vaccine. A new mucosal adjuvant, double mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT), has been shown to not only be among the conserved antigens against ETEC, but to also have properties which drive robust mucosal and systemic immune responses for antigens given orally or intramuscularly. Conserved antigens and the strategies for their use such as co-administration with dmLT will be presented in this review.

The impact of vaccines for diarrhoea on antibiotic use among children in five low-resource settings: a comparative simulation study

BACKGROUND

Vaccines for diarrhoea could have the ancillary benefit of preventing antibiotic use. We aimed to quantify and compare the expected impact of enteric vaccines on antibiotic use via Monte Carlo simulations.

METHODS

We analysed data from a longitudinal birth cohort, which enrolled children from 2009 to 2012 from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Tanzania. We used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate hypothetical vaccine impact in nine vaccination scenarios (including six single vaccines and three combination vaccines) on antibiotic- treated diarrhoea, overall antibiotic courses, and antibiotic exposures to bystander pathogens. For each vaccine scenario, we randomly selected target pathogen-specific diarrhoea episodes to be prevented according to the specified vaccine efficacy and estimated the absolute and relative differences in incidence of antibiotic use outcomes between vaccine and no vaccine scenarios.

FINDINGS

Among 1119 children, there were 3029 (135·3 courses per 100 child-years) antibiotic-treated diarrhoea episodes. Based on simulated results, a Shigella vaccine would cause the greatest reductions compared with the other single pathogen vaccines in antibiotic courses for all-cause diarrhoea (6·1% relative reduction; -8·2 courses per 100 child-years [95% CI -9·4 to -7·2]), antibiotic courses overall (1·0% relative reduction; -8·2 courses per 100 child-years [-9·4 to -7·2]), and antibiotic exposures to bystander pathogens (1·2% relative reduction; -15·9 courses per 100 child-years [-18·5 to -13·8]). An adenovirus-norovirus-rotavirus vaccine would cause the greatest reductions in antibiotic use (12·2 courses per 100 child-years [-13·7 to -11·0]) compared with the other combination vaccines. However, projected vaccine effects on antibiotic use in 2021 were 45-74% smaller than those estimated in 2009-12 accounting for reductions in diarrhoea incidence in the past decade.

INTERPRETATION

Vaccines for enteric pathogens could result in up to 8-12 prevented courses of antibiotics per 100 vaccinated children per year. Combination vaccines will probably be necessary to achieve greater than 1% reductions in total antibiotic use among children in similar low-resource settings.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Facilitating the development of urgently required combination vaccines

The essence of a vaccine lies in its ability to elicit a set of immune responses specifically directed at a particular pathogen. Accordingly, vaccines were historically designed, developed, registered, recommended, procured, and administered as monopathogen formulations. Nonetheless, the control and elimination of an astonishing number of diseases was realised only after several once-separate vaccines were provided as combinations. Unfortunately, the current superabundance of recommended and pipeline vaccines is now at odds with the number of acceptable vaccine administrations and feasible health-care visits for vaccine recipients and health-care providers. Yet, few new combinations are in development because, in addition to the scientific and manufacturing hurdles intrinsic to coformulation, developers face a gauntlet of regulatory, policy, and commercialisation obstacles in a milieu still largely designed for monopathogen vaccines. We argue here that national policy makers and public health agencies should prospectively identify and advocate for the development of new multipathogen combination vaccines, and suggest ways to accelerate the regulatory pathways to licensure of combinations and other concrete, innovative steps to mitigate current obstacles.

The 2022 Vaccines Against Shigella and Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VASE) Conference: Summary of breakout workshops

The global public health nonprofit organization PATH hosted the third Vaccines Against Shigella and Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VASE) Conference in Washington, DC, from November 29 to December 1, 2022. This international gathering focused on cutting-edge research related to the development of vaccines against neglected diarrheal pathogens including Shigella, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), Campylobacter, and non-typhoidal Salmonella. In addition to the conference's plenary content, the agenda featured ten breakout workshops on topics of importance to the enteric vaccine field. This unique aspect of VASE Conferences allows focused groups of attendees to engage in in-depth discussions on subjects of interest to the enteric vaccine development community. In 2022, the workshops covered a range of topics. Two focused on the public health value of enteric vaccines, with one examining how to translate evidence into policy and the other on the value proposition of potential combination vaccines against bacterial enteric pathogens. Two more workshops explored new tools for the development and evaluation of vaccines, with the first on integrating antigen/antibody technologies for mucosal vaccine and immunoprophylactic development, and the second on adjuvants specifically for Shigella vaccines for children in low- and middle-income countries. Another pair of workshops covered the status of vaccines against two emerging enteric pathogens, Campylobacter and invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella. The remaining four workshops examined the assessment of vaccine impact on acute and long-term morbidity. These included discussions on the nature and severity of intestinal inflammation; cellular immunity and immunological memory in ETEC and Shigella infections; clinical and microbiologic endpoints for Shigella vaccine efficacy studies in children; and intricacies of protective immunity to enteric pathogens. This article provides a brief summary of the presentations and discussions at each workshop in order to share these sessions with the broader enteric vaccine field.

A Perspective on the Strategy for Advancing ETVAX®, An Anti-ETEC Diarrheal Disease Vaccine, into a Field Efficacy Trial in Gambian Children: Rationale, Challenges, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions

For the first time in over 20 years, an Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine candidate, ETVAX®, has advanced into a phase 2b field efficacy trial for children 6-18 months of age in a low-income country. ETVAX® is an inactivated whole cell vaccine that has gone through a series of clinical trials to provide a rationale for the design elements of the Phase 2b trial. This trial is now underway in The Gambia and will be a precursor to an upcoming pivotal phase 3 trial. To reach this point, numerous findings were brought together to define factors such as safe and immunogenic doses for children, and the possible benefit of a mucosal adjuvant, double mutant labile toxin (dmLT). Considering the promising but still underexplored potential of inactivated whole cells in oral vaccination, we present a perspective compiling key observations from past ETVAX® trials that informed The Gambian trial design. This report will update the trial's status and explore future directions for ETEC vaccine trials. Our aim is to provide not only an update on the most advanced ETEC vaccine candidate but also to offer insights beneficial for the development of other much-needed oral whole-cell vaccines against enteric and other pathogens.

Exploring Shigella vaccine priorities and preferences: Results from a mixed-methods study in low- and middle-income settings

Background

Shigella is the leading bacterial cause of diarrheal mortality in children and can cause long-term effects on growth and development. No licensed Shigella vaccines currently exist but several promising candidates are in development and could be available in the next five years. Despite Shigella being a well-known public health target of the World Health Organization for decades, given current burden estimates and competing preventable disease priorities in low-income settings, whether the availability of an effective Shigella vaccine will lead to its prioritization and widespread introduction among countries at highest risk is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a mixed-methods study of national stakeholders and healthcare providers in five countries in Asia and Africa and regional stakeholders in the Pan American Health Organization to identify preferences and priorities for forthcoming Shigella vaccines.

Results

In our study of 89 individuals, diarrhea was the most frequently mentioned serious health concern for children under five years. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was more often considered very concerning than diarrhea or stunting. Shigella awareness was high but not considered a serious health concern by most stakeholders. Most participants were willing to consider adding a new vaccine to the routine immunization schedule but expressed reservations about a Shigella vaccine because of lower perceived burden relative to other preventable diseases and an already crowded schedule; interest was highest among national stakeholders in countries receiving more financial support for immunization. The priority of a Shigella vaccine rose when participants considered vaccine impacts on reducing stunting and AMR. Participants strongly preferred oral and combination vaccines compared to injectable and a single-antigen presentations, citing greater perceived community acceptability.

Conclusions

This study provides a critical opportunity to hear directly from country and regional stakeholders about health priorities and preferences around new vaccines. These findings should inform ongoing Shigella vaccine development efforts and eventual vaccine introduction and implementation planning.

Vaccine value profile for Shigella

Shigella is the leading bacterial cause of diarrhoea and the second leading cause of diarrhoeal mortality among all ages. It also exhibits increasing levels of antibiotic resistance. The greatest burden is among children under five in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). As such, a priority strategic goal of the World Health Organization (WHO) is the development of a safe, effective and affordable vaccine to reduce morbidity and mortality from Shigella-attributable dysentery and diarrhea, including long term outcomes associated with chronic inflammation and growth faltering, in children under 5 years of age in LMICs. In addition, a safe and effective Shigella vaccine is of potential interest to travellers and military both to prevent acute disease and rarer, long-term sequelae. An effective Shigella vaccine is also anticipated to reduce antibiotic use and thereby help diminish further emergence of enteric pathogens resistant to antimicrobials. The most advanced vaccine candidates are multivalent, parenteral formulations in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical studies. They rely on O-antigen-polysaccharide protein conjugate technologies or, alternatively, outer membrane vesicles expressing penta-acylated lipopolysaccharide that has been detoxified. Other parenteral and oral formulations, many delivering a broader array of Shigella antigens, are at earlier stages of clinical development. These formulations are being assessed in alignment with the WHO Preferred Product Characteristics, which call for a 1 to 2 dose primary immunization series given during the first 12 months of life, ideally starting at 6 months of age. This 'Vaccine Value Profile' (VVP) for Shigella is intended to provide a high-level, holistic assessment of the information and data that are currently available to inform the potential public health, economic and societal value of pipeline vaccines and vaccine-like products. This VVP was developed by a working group of subject matter experts from academia, non-profit organizations, government agencies and multi-lateral organizations. All contributors have extensive expertise on various elements of the Shigella VVP and collectively aimed to identify current research and knowledge gaps. The VVP was developed using only existing and publicly available information.