1
|
Jeffrey K, Hammersley V, Maini R, Crawford A, Woolford L, Batchelor A, Weatherill D, White C, Millington T, Kerr R, Basetti S, Macdonald C, Quint JK, Kerr S, Shah SA, Kurdi A, Simpson CR, Katikireddi SV, Rudan I, Robertson C, Ritchie L, Sheikh A, Daines L. Deriving and validating a risk prediction model for long COVID: a population-based, retrospective cohort study in Scotland. J R Soc Med 2024; 117:402-414. [PMID: 39556251 PMCID: PMC11574934 DOI: 10.1177/01410768241297833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/19/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Using electronic health records, we derived and internally validated a prediction model to estimate risk factors for long COVID and predict individual risk of developing long COVID. DESIGN Population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING Scotland. PARTICIPANTS Adults (≥18 years) with a positive COVID-19 test, registered with a general medical practice between 1 March 2020 and 20 October 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predictors of long COVID, and patients' predicted probabilities of developing long COVID. RESULTS A total of 68,486 (5.6%) patients were identified as having long COVID. Predictors of long COVID were increasing age (aOR: 3.84; 95% CI: 3.66-4.03 and aOR: 3.66; 95% CI: 3.27-4.09 in first and second splines), increasing body mass index (BMI) (aOR: 3.17; 95% CI: 2.78-3.61 and aOR: 3.09; 95% CI: 2.13-4.49 in first and second splines), severe COVID-19 (aOR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.72-1.84); female sex (aOR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.53-1.60), deprivation (most versus least deprived quintile, aOR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.36-1.44), several existing health conditions. Predictors associated with reduced long COVID risk were testing positive while Delta or Omicron variants were dominant, relative to when the Wild-type variant was dominant (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.88 and aOR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.61-0.67, respectively) having received one or two doses of COVID-19 vaccination, relative to unvaccinated (aOR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86-0.95 and aOR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-1.00). CONCLUSIONS Older age, higher BMI, severe COVID-19 infection, female sex, deprivation and comorbidities were predictors of long COVID. Vaccination against COVID-19 and testing positive while Delta or Omicron variants were dominant predicted reduced risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Jeffrey
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Vicky Hammersley
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Rishma Maini
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow and Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Crawford
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Lana Woolford
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | | | - David Weatherill
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Chris White
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | | | | | | | - Calum Macdonald
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Steven Kerr
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Syed Ahmar Shah
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
- Al-Kitab University, Kirkuk 36015, Iraq
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Colin R Simpson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
- School of Health, Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow and Edinburgh, UK
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Igor Rudan
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Chris Robertson
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow and Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lewis Ritchie
- Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Luke Daines
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeung A, Wilkinson M, Bishop J, Taylor B, Palmateer N, Barnsdale L, Lang J, Cameron C, McCormick D, Clusker T, McAuley A, Hutchinson S. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake and risks of severe COVID-19 disease among people prescribed opioid agonist therapy in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health 2024; 78:380-387. [PMID: 38594065 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-221602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence quantifying the risk of severe COVID-19 disease among people with opioid dependence. We examined vaccine uptake and severe disease (admission to critical care or death with COVID-19) among individuals prescribed opioid agonist therapy (OAT). METHOD A case-control design was used to examine vaccine uptake in those prescribed OAT compared with the general population, and the association between severe disease and OAT. In both analyses, 10 controls from the general population were matched (to each OAT recipient and COVID-19 case, respectively) according to socio-demographic factors. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) for severe disease. RESULTS Vaccine uptake was markedly lower in the OAT cohort (dose 1: 67%, dose 2: 53% and dose 3: 31%) compared with matched controls (76%, 72% and 57%, respectively). Those prescribed OAT within the last 5 years, compared with those not prescribed, had increased risk of severe COVID-19 (RR 3.38, 95% CI 2.75 to 4.15), particularly in the fourth wave (RR 6.58, 95% CI 4.20 to 10.32); adjustment for comorbidity and vaccine status attenuated this risk (adjusted RR (aRR) 2.43, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.02; wave 4 aRR 3.78, 95% CI 2.30 to 6.20). Increased risk was also observed for those prescribed OAT previously (>3 months ago) compared with recently (aRR 1.74, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.71). CONCLUSIONS The widening gap in vaccine coverage for those prescribed OAT, compared with the general population, is likely to have exacerbated the risk of severe COVID-19 in this population over the pandemic. However, continued OAT use may have provided protection from severe COVID-19 among those with opioid dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Yeung
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Max Wilkinson
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Norah Palmateer
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew McAuley
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharon Hutchinson
- Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|