Response to "Non-segmented negative-strand RNA virus RNA synthesis in vivo"

Developments in Plant Negative-Strand RNA Virus Reverse Genetics

Twenty years ago, breakthroughs for reverse genetics analyses of negative-strand RNA (NSR) viruses were achieved by devising conditions for generation of infectious viruses in susceptible cells. Recombinant strategies have subsequently been engineered for members of all vertebrate NSR virus families, and research arising from these advances has profoundly increased understanding of infection cycles, pathogenesis, and complexities of host interactions of animal NSR viruses. These strategies also permitted development of many applications, including attenuated vaccines and delivery vehicles for therapeutic and biotechnology proteins. However, for a variety of reasons, it was difficult to devise procedures for reverse genetics analyses of plant NSR viruses. In this review, we discuss advances that have circumvented these problems and resulted in construction of a recombinant system for Sonchus yellow net nucleorhabdovirus. We also discuss possible extensions to other plant NSR viruses as well as the applications that may emanate from recombinant analyses of these pathogens.

The RNA synthesis machinery of negative-stranded RNA viruses

The group of Negative-Stranded RNA Viruses (NSVs) includes many human pathogens, like the influenza, measles, mumps, respiratory syncytial or Ebola viruses, which produce frequent epidemics of disease and occasional, high mortality outbreaks by transmission from animal reservoirs. The genome of NSVs consists of one to several single-stranded, negative-polarity RNA molecules that are always assembled into mega Dalton-sized complexes by association to many nucleoprotein monomers. These RNA-protein complexes or ribonucleoproteins function as templates for transcription and replication by action of the viral RNA polymerase and accessory proteins. Here we review our knowledge on these large RNA-synthesis machines, including the structure of their components, the interactions among them and their enzymatic activities, and we discuss models showing how they perform the virus transcription and replication programmes.

Initiation and regulation of paramyxovirus transcription and replication

The paramyxovirus family has a genome consisting of a single strand of negative sense RNA. This genome acts as a template for two distinct processes: transcription to generate subgenomic, capped and polyadenylated mRNAs, and genome replication. These viruses only encode one polymerase. Thus, an intriguing question is, how does the viral polymerase initiate and become committed to either transcription or replication? By answering this we can begin to understand how these two processes are regulated. In this review article, we present recent findings from studies on the paramyxovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, which show how its polymerase is able to initiate transcription and replication from a single promoter. We discuss how these findings apply to other paramyxoviruses. Then, we examine how trans-acting proteins and promoter secondary structure might serve to regulate transcription and replication during different phases of the paramyxovirus replication cycle.

Vesicular stomatitis virus polymerase's strong affinity to its template suggests exotic transcription models

Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is the prototype for negative sense non segmented (NNS) RNA viruses which include potent human and animal pathogens such as Rabies, Ebola and measles. The polymerases of NNS RNA viruses only initiate transcription at or near the 3′ end of their genome template. We measured the dissociation constant of VSV polymerases from their whole genome template to be 20 pM. Given this low dissociation constant, initiation and sustainability of transcription becomes nontrivial. To explore possible mechanisms, we simulated the first hour of transcription using Monte Carlo methods and show that a one-time initial dissociation of all polymerases during entry is not sufficient to sustain transcription. We further show that efficient transcription requires a sliding mechanism for non-transcribing polymerases and can be realized with different polymerase-polymerase interactions and distinct template topologies. In conclusion, we highlight a model in which collisions between transcribing and sliding non-transcribing polymerases result in release of the non-transcribing polymerases allowing for redistribution of polymerases between separate templates during transcription and suggest specific experiments to further test these mechanisms.

RNA dependent RNA Polymerases tight association with their template creates an almost infinite dilution transcription machinery. Polymerases are delivered to the host cytoplasm associated with the genome template, however, they initiate transcription only at or near the 3′ end of the genome template. How these polymerases initiate and sustain transcription is completely unknown. Given the efficiency of these polymerases and their nontrivial template interactions, understanding their mechanism has both medical and nano-technological applications. Here we show that efficient transcription requires a sliding mechanism for non-transcribing polymerases and can be realized with different polymerase-polymerase interactions.

Rabies virus transcription and replication

Rabies virus (RABV) is a negative-stranded RNA virus. Its genome is tightly encapsidated by the viral nucleoprotein (N) and this RNA-N complex is the template for transcription and replication by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L) and its cofactor, the phosphoprotein (P). We present molecular, structural, and cellular aspects of RABV transcription and replication. We first summarize the characteristics and molecular biology of both RNA synthesis processes. We then discuss biochemical and structural data on the viral proteins (N, P, and L) and their interactions with regard to their role in viral transcription and replication. Finally, we review evidence that rabies viral transcription and replication take place in cytoplasmic inclusion bodies formed in RABV-infected cells and discuss the role of this cellular compartmentalization.

Interferon in rabies virus infection

Rabies is among the longest known and most dangerous and feared infectious diseases for humans and animals and still is responsible for tenth of thousands of human deaths per year. The rabies virus (RABV) is a rather atypical member of the Rhabdoviridae family as it has completely adapted during evolution to warm-blooded hosts and is directly transmitted between them, whereas most other rhabdoviruses are transmitted by insect vectors. The virus is also unique with respect to its extremely broad host species range and a very narrow host organ range, namely its strict neurotropism. It is becoming increasingly clear that the host innate immune system, particularly the type I interferon system, and the viral counteractions profoundly shape this virus-host relationship. In the past few years, exciting new insight was obtained on how viruses are sensed by innate immune receptors, how the downstream signaling networks for activation of interferon are working, and how viruses can interfere with the system. While RABV 5'-triphosphate RNAs were identified as the major pathogen-associated molecular pattern sensed by cytoplasmic RIG-I-like receptors (RLR), the RABV phosphoprotein (P) has emerged as a potent multifunctional antagonist able to counteract the signaling cascades leading to transcriptional activation of interferon genes as well as interferon signaling pathways, thereby limiting expression of antiviral and immune-stimulatory genes.

Rhabdovirus evasion of the interferon system

The family Rhabdoviridae contains important pathogens of humans, livestock, and crops, including the insect-transmitted vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and the neurotropic rabies virus (RV), which is directly transmitted between mammals. In spite of a highly similar organization of RNA genomes, proteins, and virus particles, cell biology of VSV and RV is divergent in several aspects, particularly with respect to their interplay with the cellular host defense. While infection with both rhabdoviruses is recognized via viral triphosphate RNAs by the cytoplasmic RNA helicase/translocase RIG-I, the viral counteractions to limit the response are contrasting. VSV infection is characterized by a rapid general shutdown of host gene expression and severe cytopathic effects, due to multiple activities of the matrix (M) protein affecting host polymerase functions and mRNA nuclear export, and by rapid and high-level virus replication. In contrast, RV spread and transmission relies on preserving the integrity of host cells, particularly of neurons. While a general cell shutdown by RV M is not observed, RV phosphoprotein (P) has developed independent functions to interfere with activation of IRFs and with STAT signaling. The molecular mechanisms employed are different from those of the paramyxovirus P gene products serving similar functions, and illustrate evolution of IFN antagonists to specifically support virus survival in the natural niches.

Drosophila viruses and the study of antiviral host-defense

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a powerful model to study host-pathogen interactions. Most studies so far have focused on extracellular pathogens such as bacteria and fungi. More recently, viruses have come to the front, and RNA interference was shown to play a critical role in the control of viral infections in drosophila. We review here our current knowledge on drosophila viruses. A diverse set of RNA viruses belonging to several families (Rhabdoviridae, Dicistroviridae, Birnaviridae, Reoviridae, Errantiviridae) has been reported in D. melanogaster. By contrast, no DNA virus has been recovered up to now. The drosophila viruses represent powerful tools to study virus-cell interactions in vivo. Analysis of the literature however reveals that for many of them, important gaps exist in our understanding of their replication cycle, genome organization, morphology or pathogenesis. The data obtained in the past few years on antiviral defense mechanisms in drosophila, which point to evolutionary conserved pathways, highlight the potential of the D. melanogaster model to study antiviral innate immunity and to better understand the complex interaction between arthropod-borne viruses and their insect vectors.