Permeability Surface Area Product Using Perfusion Computed Tomography Is a Valuable Prognostic Factor in Glioblastomas Treated with Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide

Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.

Perfusion MRI in treatment evaluation of glioblastomas: Clinical relevance of current and future techniques

Treatment evaluation of patients with glioblastomas is important to aid in clinical decisions. Conventional MRI with contrast is currently the standard method, but unable to differentiate tumor progression from treatment-related effects. Pseudoprogression appears as new enhancement, and thus mimics tumor progression on conventional MRI. Contrarily, a decrease in enhancement or edema on conventional MRI during antiangiogenic treatment can be due to pseudoresponse and is not necessarily reflective of a favorable outcome. Neovascularization is a hallmark of tumor progression but not for posttherapeutic effects. Perfusion-weighted MRI provides a plethora of additional parameters that can help to identify this neovascularization. This review shows that perfusion MRI aids to identify tumor progression, pseudoprogression, and pseudoresponse. The review provides an overview of the most applicable perfusion MRI methods and their limitations. Finally, future developments and remaining challenges of perfusion MRI in treatment evaluation in neuro-oncology are discussed. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:11-22.

High Expression of Glypican-1 Predicts Dissemination and Poor Prognosis in Glioblastomas

OBJECTIVE

Glioblastoma (GBM) relapses locally or in a disseminated pattern and is highly resistant to chemoradiotherapy. Although dissemination is associated with poor prognosis for patients with GBM, the clinicopathologic factors that promote dissemination have not been elucidated. Glypican-1 (GPC-1) is a heparin sulfate proteoglycan that is attached to the extracytoplasmic surface of the cell membrane and regulates cell motility. The aim of this study was to determine whether GPC-1 expression correlated with GBM dissemination and patient prognosis.

METHODS

GPC-1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in 53 patients with GBM who received radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment. We assessed the relationship between dissemination and clinicopathologic factors, including GPC-1 expression. We also evaluated the relationship between GPC-1 expression and overall survival (OS) by uni- and multivariate analyses of a range of clinicopathologic factors, including age, Karnofsky Performance Status, extent of resection, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed that GPC-1 expression correlated with dissemination (P = 0.0116). Log-rank tests revealed that age, Karnofsky Performance Status, extent of resection, MGMT status, dissemination (P = 0.0008) and GPC-1 expression (P = 0.0011) were significantly correlated with OS. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, MGMT status, and GPC-1 expression were significantly correlated with OS. GPC-1 expression had the highest hazard ratio (2.392) among all regressors.

CONCLUSIONS

GPC-1 expression significantly correlated with OS in patients with GBM who received radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment. GPC-1 expression can help predict the occurrence of dissemination and shorter OS in patients with GBM.

Prognostic importance of temozolomide-induced neutropenia in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype patients

Standard treatment for patients with primary glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery, radiotherapy, and concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Recent reports have demonstrated that TMZ-induced myelosuppression correlates with survival in patients with GBM. However, those results were evaluated before the 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification. This study examined whether myelosuppression during concomitant TMZ phase correlates with prognosis in GBM, IDH-wildtype patients. We examined circulating blood cell counts in 50 patients with GBM, IDH-wildtype who received the standard treatment protocol between August 2005 and November 2015. We assessed relationships between rates of decrease in blood cells (white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils, lymphocytes, red blood cells, and platelets) during the concomitant TMZ phase and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate analyses including other clinicopathological factors (age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extent of resection, O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status). Log-rank testing revealed that age, KPS, extent of resection, MGMT status, and decrease rates of WBC, neutrophils, and platelets correlated significantly with OS. On multivariate analysis, age, MGMT status, and decrease rate of neutrophils correlated significantly with OS. Patients with a ≥ 40% decrease in neutrophils showed significantly longer OS than those with < 40% (hazard ratio = 2.815; 95% confidence interval = 1.177-7.038; P = 0.0196). A decrease of ≥ 40% in neutrophils represents a predictor of good prognosis for GBM, IDH-wildtype. Blood cell counts during the concomitant TMZ phase can help predict OS in patients with GBM, IDH-wildtype receiving the standard treatment protocol.