Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Craniotomy for the Treatment of Bilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Anatomic and Clinical Parameters and Surgical Outcomes

Clipping of anterior circulation aneurysms using fully endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy: a clinical study and analysis

Endoscopy's ability to provide close observation, deep magnification, and multi-angle views has proven to be an effective tool for minimally invasive craniotomy in neurosurgery. However, no large case series have been published on the use of fully endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy for clipping intracranial aneurysms (IAs). To evaluate the value of fully endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy in the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients who underwent fully endoscopic-assisted minimally keyhole invasive craniotomy for clipping of IAs. A total of 9 anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms were clipped using the supraorbital keyhole approach (SKA). Additionally, 10 middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCA) and 2 posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms were clipped using the pterional keyhole approach (PKA). The clipping success rate was 100% in all patients. Apart from one patient who experienced transient third cranial nerve palsy, one who developed an intracranial infection, and one who had a brief seizure, no other patients experienced serious complications. Except for one patient who had residual muscle weakness due to a preoperative basal ganglia hemorrhage, all other patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 1. Fully endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy has promising applications in the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms in Hunt-Hess grade 0-II, especially for unruptured aneurysms. Future multi-center studies are needed to confirm its broader applicability.

Trends in the Age of Patients Treated for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms from 1990 to 2020

BACKGROUND

The decision for treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is often difficult. Innovation in endovascular devices have improved the benefit-to-risk profile especially for elderly patients; however, the treatment guidelines from the past decade often recommend conservative management. It is unknown how these changes have affected the overall age of the patients selected for treatment. Herein, we aimed to study potential changes in the average age of the patients that are being treated over time.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify all studies describing the age of the UIAs that were treated by any modality. Scatter diagrams with trend lines were used to plot the age of the patients treated over time and assess the presence of a potential significant trend via statistical correlation tests.

RESULTS

A total of 280 studies including 83,437 UIAs treated between 1987 and 2021 met all eligibility criteria and were entered in the analysis. Mean age of the patients was 55.5 years, and 70.7% were female. There was a significant increasing trend in the age of the treated patients over time (Spearman r: 0.250; P < 0.001), with a 1-year increase in the average age of the treated patients every 5 years since 1987.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that based on the treated UIA patient data published in the literature, older UIAs are being treated over time. This trend is likely driven by safer treatments while suggesting that re-evaluation of certain UIA treatment decision scores may be of great interest.

Simultaneous Craniotomies for Multiple Intracranial Aneurysm Clippings-One-Stage Surgery with Multiple Craniotomies

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms (MIAs) involves various modalities and sometimes requires staged operations. This study aimed to prove the efficacy and safety of one-stage multiple craniotomies (OSMC) for multiple cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent treatment for intracranial aneurysms between May 2003 and April 2020. The surgical results, complications, and lengths of hospital stay were compared between the patients who underwent OSMC and those who underwent multistage multiple craniotomies.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics of the OSMC and multistage multiple craniotomies groups (n = 82 and 43, respectively) were similar. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups when the amount of blood transfused, complications, and surgical results were compared (P = n.s. for all); however, the operation time and hospitalization period (353.9 minutes vs. 490.3 minutes and 12.3 days vs. 21.8 days, respectively; P = 0.001 for both) were shorter in the OSMC group. The treatment cost (17,000 USD vs. 22,000 USD, P = 0.001) was lower in the OSMC group.

CONCLUSIONS

OSMC for aneurysm clipping in patients with MIAs is a relatively safe and economical method. Furthermore, it has good clinical outcomes. This new surgical method is worthwhile in that it can be applied to patients who are afraid to undergo multiple surgeries, and we suggest that it is an efficient, low-cost option for the treatment of MIAs.

Contralateral approach for the treatment of a distal supraclinoid aneurysm: a technical case report

Background: When treating intracranial aneurysms with open microsurgery, rare cases arise in which an ipsilateral approach leads to poor visualization, lack of proximal control, or potential damage to nearby vital structures due to the anatomy of the aneurysm. Case Description: We describe a patient with a small, unruptured aneurysm arising from the medial aspect of the distal supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), just below the ICA bifurcation. A contralateral surgical approach was chosen because our view of the aneurysm from an ipsilateral approach would have been obstructed by the ICA. The contralateral approach provided excellent exposure of the aneurysm and allowed for precise clip placement without complications. Conclusions: Contralateral approaches may be a good option for some small medially pointing aneurysm of large proximal cerebral arteries.

Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Flow Diversion for Treatment of Anterior Circulation Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Nearly 20% of individuals with an aneurysm will have multiple aneurysms-these individuals are at increased risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Treatment of bilateral aneurysms with flow diverters (FDs), or Pipeline embolization device, has not yet been established as an effective therapy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 2-stage treatment of bilateral aneurysms with Pipeline embolization devices placed 6 months apart.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 16 individuals with bilateral aneurysms treated with 2-stage flow diversion at a tertiary referral center from January 2010 to July 2018.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients with 33 aneurysms treated with bilateral flow diversion, 1 had 2 aneurysms treated with a single FD on the contralateral side. The aneurysms treated were ophthalmic, superior hypophyseal, posterior communicating, or cavernous segment aneurysms, with an average size of 6.5 mm. No major complications, such as in-stent stenosis, thromboembolic events, distal intraparenchymal hemorrhage, rerupture, stent migration, or neurological death, were recorded. All the patients had good functional outcomes. At the 24-month follow-up examination, 81% of aneurysms showed complete occlusion. No aneurysm required repeat treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present study have demonstrated that 2-stage treatment of bilateral aneurysms with FDs is both safe and efficacious. The timing of contralateral FD stent placement is critical. We found that 6 months allows for adequate neurological recovery and stent endothelialization.

A literature review concerning contralateral approaches to paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms

Ipsilateral approaches remain the standard technique for clipping paraclinoid aneurysms. Surgeons must however be prepared to deal with bony and neural structures restricting accessibility. The application of a contralateral approach has been proposed claiming that some structures in the region can be better exposed from this side. Yet, only few case series have been published evaluating this approach, and there is a lack of systematic reviews assessing its specific advantages and disadvantages. We performed a structured literature search and identified 19 relevant publications summarizing 138 paraclinoid aneurysms operated via a contralateral approach. Patient's age ranged from 19 to 79 years. Aneurysm size mainly varied between 2 and 10 mm and only three articles reported larger aneurysms. Most aneurysms were located at the origin of the ophthalmic artery, followed by the superior hypophyseal artery and carotid cave. All aneurysm protruded from the medial aspect of the carotid artery. Interestingly, minimal or even no optic nerve mobilization was required during exposure from the contralateral side. Strategies to achieve proximal control of the carotid artery were balloon occlusion and clinoid segment or cervical carotid exposure. Successful aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 135 cases, while 3 ophthalmic aneurysms had to be wrapped only. Complications including visual deterioration, CSF fistula, wound infection, vasospasm, artery dissection, infarction, and anosmia occurred in a low percentage of cases. We conclude that a contralateral approach can be effective and should be considered for clipping carefully selected cases of unruptured aneurysms arising from medial aspects of the above listed vessels.