The Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenting

Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Vertebrobasilar Artery Stent Placement

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vertebrobasilar artery stent placement (VBS) is potentially effective in preventing recurrent posterior circulation strokes; however, the incidences of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory ischemic events based on the location of stent placement have rarely been investigated. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of VBS between intracranial and extracranial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was single-center retrospective cohort study, and we obtained medical records of patients who underwent VBS. We compared clinical and periprocedural factors between extracranial and intracranial VBS. The primary outcomes included the incidence of in-stent restenosis (>50% reduction in lumen diameter) and stented-territory ischemic events. We compared the incidence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory ischemic events by using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients, 41 (39.0%) underwent extracranial VBS, and 64 (61.0%) underwent intracranial VBS. During the follow-up, the incidences of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory ischemic events were 15.2% and 22.9%, respectively. The procedure time was longer (47.7 ± 19.5 minutes versus 74.5 ± 35.2 minutes, P < .001), and the rate of residual stenosis (≥30%) just after VBS was higher (2 [4.9%] versus 24 [37.5%], P < .001) in intracranial VBS than in extracranial VBS. Also, the incidences of in-stent restenosis were significantly higher in intracranial VBS than in extracranial VBS (4.9% versus 21.9%, P = .037). On the other hand, the incidences of stented-territory ischemic events (7.3% versus 32.8%, P < .001) were significantly higher in intracranial VBS than in extracranial VBS. The main mechanisms of stroke were artery-to-artery embolism (2 [66.7%]) in extracranial VBS, and artery-to-artery embolism (9 [42.9%]) and branch atheromatous disease (8 [38.1%]) in intracranial VBS. The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated a higher incidence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory ischemic events in intracranial VBS than in extracranial VBS (P = .008 and P = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During the follow-up, the incidence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory ischemic events was higher in patients with intracranial VBS than in those with extracranial VBS. The higher rates of postprocedural residual stenosis might have contributed to the increased risk of in-stent restenosis. Furthermore, prolonged procedure time and additional stroke mechanism, including branch atheromatous disease, might be associated with a higher risk of stented-territory ischemic events in intracranial VBS.

In-stent restenosis after vertebral artery origin stenosis stenting: a nomogram for risk assessment

OBJECTIVE

To propose a nomogram for individual risk assessment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) stenting.

METHODS

We included 793 patients with VAOS treated with stenting from October 2006 to May 2013, with a median follow-up of 27.8 months. Cox regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were adopted for variable selection. The nomogram was formulated and validated by concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. An in-stent restenosis risk table (ISR-RT) was subsequently generated for risk stratification. Differences between low-, intermediate-, and high-risk levels were shown by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

The training and validation set included 594 and 199 patients, with a mean ISR rate of 37.2% and 35.2%, respectively. Stent type (HR=1.64, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.14), stent diameter (HR=2.48, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.48), history of peripheral vascular disease (HR=2.17, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.00), history of transit ischemic attack (HR=1.45, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.14), and left-side involvement (HR=1.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.69) were included in the nomogram. The C-indexes at 6 and 12 months were 0.650 and 0.611 in the training set, and 0.713 and 0.603 in the validation set, respectively. Compared with low-risk patients, the intermediate- and high-level group had 1.46 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.04; p=0.0235) and 2.28 (95% CI 1.64 to 3.17; p<0.0001) higher chances of developing ISR in 2 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram and a risk evaluation table were developed with good predictive ability for in-stent restenosis among patients with VAOS, which could serve as a practical approach for individualized risk evaluation.

Site and Mechanism of Recurrent Pontine Infarction: A Hospital-Based Follow-Up Study

Although pontine infarction is the most common subtype of posterior circulation stroke, there has been little research focusing on recurrent pontine infarction. Our study aimed to investigate the factors associated with site and mechanism of recurrent pontine infarction. Patients with acute isolated pontine infarction were enrolled and followed up for one year. Lesion topography was determined by diffusion-weighted imaging. Mechanisms were determined based on lesion topography and other vascular, cardiologic and laboratory results. A total of 562 patients with pontine infarction were included, with 67 patients experiencing recurrence during the follow-up period. Forty-one recurrences occurred at the same site as index pontine infarction (41/67, 61.2%). Results indicated that the mechanism of index pontine infarction was significantly associated with the recurrent sites (p = 0.041, OR 2.938, 95% CI 1.044–8.268), and also with the mechanisms of recurrence (p = 0.004, OR 6.056, 95% CI 1.774–20.679). Branch atheromatous disease-induced index pontine infarction was likely to recur at the same site and with the same mechanism. Moreover, if recurrence occurred at the same site, the mechanism was probably the same as that of the index stroke (p = 0.000). Our study may help physicians treat patients with pontine infarction by predicting the site and mechanism of recurrence.

Higher Prevalence of Diabetes in Pontine Infarction than in Other Posterior Circulation Strokes

BACKGROUND

Pontine infarction is the major subtype of posterior circulation stroke, and diabetes is more common in pontine infarction patients than in anterior circulation stroke patients. Whether the prevalence of diabetes remains homogenous within the posterior circulation stroke population is unclear. The present study is aimed at investigating the prevalence of diabetes in pontine infarction and comparing it to other subtypes of posterior circulation stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter case-control study. Patients with posterior circulation stroke were screened. The subjects were divided into pontine infarction and nonpontine infarction groups.

RESULTS

From November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2021, a total of 6145 stroke patients were screened and 2627 patients had posterior circulation strokes. After excluding cardioembolic stroke, as well as its other determined and undetermined causes, 1549 patients with 754 pontine infarctions were included in the analysis. The prevalence of diabetes in the pontine infarction group was higher than that in the nonpontine infarction group (42.7% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, diabetes was an independent risk factor for pontine infarction (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27-2.09, P < 0.05). For small vessel occlusion, diabetes was also more common in the pontine infarction group (43.2% vs. 30.0%, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that diabetes was an independent risk factor for pontine infarction (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32-2.46, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with the nonpontine infarction subtype of posterior circulation stroke, patients with pontine infarction had a higher prevalence of diabetes, and diabetes was an independent risk factor for pontine infarction.

The Relationship Between APOE Gene Polymorphism and In-stent Restenosis After Stenting at the Beginning of the Vertebral Artery

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively investigate the relationship between apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene polymorphism and in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stenting at the beginning of the vertebral artery.

METHODS

The study included 155 patients who successfully underwent stenting at the beginning of the vertebral artery and had postoperative digital subtraction angiography or computed tomography angiography. Based on the follow-up results, they were divided into the restenosis (ISR) group and non-restenosis (non-ISR) group. The clinical information and APOE genotypes of both groups were analyzed. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyze independent risk factors for ISR.

RESULTS

After 1 year of follow-up, 49 (31.6%) patients had ISR and 106 (68.4%) did not. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum lipoprotein-related phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and E3/E4 genotype were independent risk factors for ISR after stenting at the beginning of the vertebral artery. In addition, the LDL-C level of patients with the E3/E4 genotype was higher compared with the E3/E3 genotype group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

APOE gene polymorphism is associated with ISR, and the E3/E4 genotype is an independent risk factor for ISR after stenting at the beginning of the vertebral artery. Further genetic studies can identify risk genotypes to facilitate the early prediction and identification of high-risk patients with ISR.

Long-Term Outcome of Enterprise Stenting for Symptomatic ICAS in a High-Volume Stroke Center

Background and Purpose: The Enterprise stent has been used for treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), but its long-term outcome remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the Enterprise stent used for patients with symptomatic ICAS due to hypoperfusion.

Method: Patients with symptomatic ICAS due to hypoperfusion treated with the Enterprise stents from a high-volume stroke center were evaluated. The successful recanalization was defined as the Modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥ 2b. The stroke and neurological death that occurred within 72 h after the procedure as well as long-term clinical and imaging outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Overall, 130 patients with 130 ICAS treated with the Enterprise stent were included in our study. The successful recanalization rate was 100%. The mean pre- and postprocedural stenosis was 82.9 ± 8.9% vs. 15.1 ± 8.4%. Periprocedural complications occurred in 5 (3.8%) patients within 72 h after the procedure. Clinical follow-up data were available in 125 (96.2%) patients (median, 24 months) and any stroke or neurological death was encountered in 6 (4.8%) patients. Angiographic follow-up data was obtained from 118 (90.8%) patients (median, 13.5 months). In addition, 1-year in-stent restenosis (>70%) was found in 17 (14.4%) patients, and among them, 4 (23.5%) patients were symptomatic.

Conclusion: Deployment of Enterprise stent is safe for ICAS. The short-term and long-term outcomes were acceptable, but the efficacy of the Enterprise stent needs to be further evaluated in future studies.

Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Stenting treatment for refractory symptomatic patients with vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is safe; however, there is a high rate of in-stent restenosis. Although drug-eluting stents can reduce the incidence of restenosis to some extent, there is still a risk caused by stent fracture. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been proven to reduce the rate of restenosis in peripheral and coronary artery disease. DCB can prevent inflammation caused by extraneous material stimulation and allow the subsequent treatment that is characteristic of "leave nothing behind." The purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of DCB and bare metal stent (BMS) in the treatment of VAOS. Method/Design: This trial is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial that compares the DCB to BMS in terms of angiographically assessed target lesion binary restenosis (≥50%) at 12 months in endovascular treatment of symptomatic patients with VAOS. Discussion: A total of 180 patients with symptomatic VAOS who match the trial eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with DCB (n = 90) or BMS (n = 90). An angiographic core laboratory-adjudicated target lesion binary restenosis (≥50%) at 12 months of follow-up was selected as primary efficacy endpoint to assess the DCB treatment effect. A clinical events committee will assess the safety endpoints of all-cause death, target vessel related transient ischemic attack and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke events. A data safety monitoring board will periodically review safety data for subject safety, the study conduct, and progress. In this trial, randomization is only allowed after successful pre-dilatation. We anticipate that this trial will provide rigorous data to clarify whether DCBs are beneficial in patients with symptomatic VAOS. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03910166.

Balloon-mounted stenting for ICAS in a multicenter registry study in China: a comparison with the WEAVE/WOVEN trial

Background

The outcome of deploying balloon-mounted stents for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) has not been fully investigated. In this study we evaluate the safety and long-term outcome of using balloon-mounted stents to treat symptomatic ICAS in comparison with the WEAVE/WOVEN study.

Methods

In a multicenter registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China, 159 patients treated with an intracranial balloon-mounted stent approved by the China Food and Drug Administration were evaluated. The morphological features of the lesions were categorized by Mori classification. The endpoints, including periprocedural and long-term clinical and radiological outcomes, were the same as those in the WEAVE/WOVEN study.

Results

In the present study the mean percent stenosis before and after stenting was 84.0% and 6.1%, respectively. The proportions of Mori A, Mori B, and Mori C lesions were 33.3%, 52.2%, and 14.5%, respectively. The 72-hour rates of stroke and mortality after the procedure were 0%. The 1-year rates of any stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and death were 6.3% (10/159), 5.7% (9/159), 0.6% (1/159), and 0.6% (1/159), respectively. The 1-year rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) was 23.4% (15/64). The rate of ISR in Mori C lesions (53.8%, 7/13) was significantly higher than that in Mori A (15.8%, 3/19) or Mori B lesions (15.6%, 5/32) (p=0.024).

Conclusions

The short-term and long-term outcomes of using a balloon-mounted stent for symptomatic ICAS with focal and non-angular lesions (Mori A and B type) and smooth arterial access were comparable to the results of the WEAVE/WOVEN trial.

Hybrid Recanalization for the Treatment of Carotid/Vertebral In-stent Restenosis or Occlusion: Pilot Surgery Experiences From One Single Center

Background : The hybrid recanalization of internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery (VA) in-stent restenosis or occlusion using a combination of endarterectomy and endovascular intervention has achieved technical success. We present our surgical experiences to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the hybrid technique for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and occlusion. Methods : A cohort of 12 refractory patients with in-stent restenosis or occlusion who underwent hybrid recanalization, a combination of endarterectomy and endovascular intervention, were retrospectively analyzed. Medical records, including presenting symptoms, comorbidities, contralateral ICA/VA findings, use of antiplatelet drugs, postoperative complications, and angiographic outcomes, were collected. Results : Among 415 consecutive patients with ICA, common carotid artery, and V1 segment lesions, 12 refractory patients (2.89%) with 13 cases were enrolled in our study (1 female and 11 male). All patients underwent successful hybrid recanalization. There were no cases of postoperative stroke or death. Only two patients sustained hoarseness, but it resolved within 2 weeks after surgery. Three patients were treated with dual antiplatelet (aspirin and clopidogrel), seven with single antiplatelet (aspirin), one with single antiplatelet (clopidogrel), and one with single antiplatelet (ticagrelor). All patients were followed up in the outpatient department according to the protocol, with a mean follow-up period of 13 months (range, 6-24 months). No death or recurrent symptoms occurred during the regular follow-up period. Conclusion : The hybrid technique maybe a safe and feasible treatment option to recanalize in-stent restenosis or occlusion with acceptable complications.

The Association Between Apolipoprotein E Gene Polymorphism and In-Stent Restenosis After Extracranial and Intracranial Artery Stenting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neo-atherosclerosis plays a vital role in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after extracranial and intracranial artery stenting, and Apolipoprotein (ApoE) gene polymorphism has been reported to be closely related to the occurrence and development of atherosclerosis. The present study aims to investigate the association between ApoE gene polymorphism and ISR after extracranial and intracranial artery stenting.

METHODS

A total of 169 patients with successful stent implantation were included in this study. ApoE genotypes were obtained during the postoperative follow-up. Color Doppler ultrasonography of cervical artery or head and neck CT angiography (CTA) was performed on the 1,3,6 and 12 months and then yearly in the clinical follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of independent risk factors was performed to evaluate the ISR. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare the restenosis -free rate among the patients with different ApoE genotypes.

RESULTS

Of the 169 patients, 43 (43/169, 25.4%) developed ISR after a mean follow-up period of 10.4 months (1-35 months). Multivariate analysis showed that genotype E4/E4 (hazard ratio 3.305, P = 0.031, 95% confidence interval 1.118-9.773) and degree of stenosis >90% (hazard ratio 5.083, P = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.938-13.327) were significant determinants of ISR.

CONCLUSION

ApoE gene polymorphism is closely related to the incidence of ISR after extracranial and intracranial artery stenting, and the genotype E4/E4 is an independent risk factor for ISR.

Cilostazol plus clopidogrel in the prevention of in-stent stenosis after vertebral artery origin stenting in gout patients: three case reports

It is unclear whether cilostazol instead of aspirin in combination with clopidogrel could prevent in-stent thrombosis in patients with a history of gout undergoing vertebral artery origin stenting. Three men (age range, 58–74 years) were diagnosed with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Vertebral artery origin stenosis was visible by computed tomographic angiography or digital subtraction angiography. Four bare metal stents were placed in the vertebral artery origin. The patients were administered 100 mg cilostazol orally twice a day and 75 mg clopidogrel orally once a day perioperatively and 100 mg cilostazol orally twice day was administered indefinitely after 3 months. No in-stent stenosis was observed in all of these patients during a follow-up period up to 19 months. Cilostazol plus clopidogrel has the potential to become an alternative to standard dual antiplatelet therapy in vertebral artery origin stenting. A high-quality clinical trial is needed to verify these preliminary findings.

Drug-coated balloon for vertebral artery origin stenosis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a potential treatment for patients with low restenosis risk in vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS). However, the clinical data of long-term outcome are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a DCB in patients with severe VAOS.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, single-center pilot study enrolled 30 patients with severe VAOS treated with DCB between 2017 and 2018. The first 20 patients were treated with a balloon-to-vessel ratio of predilation (pBVR)＜0.8 (small-size balloon predilation) and the following 10 patients were treated with a pBVR 0.8-1.0 (large-size balloon predilation). Primary safety endpoints included 30-day death, stroke, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). The main efficacy outcome was restenosis at 6 months, defined as a peak systolic velocity >140 cm/s measured by Doppler ultrasound. Long-term outcomes, including TIAs, stroke, death, and modified Rankin Scale score, were followed up to 2 years.

RESULTS

Technical success (<50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 26 patients (mean age 66.2±7.0; seven women). Four patients received bailout stenting and were excluded. Ultrasound confirmed restenosis at 6 months in 10 (38.5%) of 26, which was significantly less frequent in LSBP (LSBP vs SSBP=10% vs 56.3%, p<0.05). No adverse events occurred within 30 days of treatment. 19 patients were followed up for 2 years, with two deaths due to cancer.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that DCB is a safe approach for VAOS. The relatively low restenosis rate indicates the its potential long-term efficacy for VAOS. Future randomized controlled trials to confirm its efficacy are warranted.

Carotid-vertebral artery bypass with saphenous vein graft for symptomatic vertebrobasilar insufficiency

OBJECTIVESymptomatic steno-occlusion of the proximal vertebral artery (VA) or subclavian artery (ScA) heralds a poor prognosis and high risk of stroke recurrence despite medical therapy, including antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. In some cases, the V2 segment of the cervical VA is patent and perfused via collateral vessels. The authors describe 7 patients who were successfully treated by external carotid artery (ECA)-saphenous vein (SV)-VA bypass.METHODSSeven cases involving symptomatic patients were retrospectively studied: 3 cases of V1 segment occlusion, 2 cases of severe in-stent restenosis in the V1 segment, and 2 cases of occlusion of the proximal ScA. All patients underwent ECA-SV-VA bypass. The ECA was isolated and retracted, and the anterior wall of the transverse foramen was unroofed. The VA was exposed, and then the 2 ends of the SV were anastomosed to the VA and ECA in an end-to-side fashion.RESULTSSurgical procedures were all performed as planned, with no intraoperative complications. There were 2 postoperative complications (severe laryngeal edema in one case and shoulder weakness in another), but both patients recovered fully and measures were taken to minimize laryngeal edema and its effects in subsequent cases. All patients experienced improvement of their symptoms. No new neurological deficits were reported. Postoperative angiography demonstrated that the anastomoses were all patent, and analysis of follow-up data (range of follow-up 12-78 months) revealed no further ischemic events in the vertebrobasilar territory.CONCLUSIONSThe ECA-SV-VA bypass is a useful treatment for patients who suffer medically refractory ischemic events in the vertebrobasilar territory when the proximal part of the VA or ScA is severely stenosed or occluded but the V2 segment of the cervical VA is patent.

Incidence, risk, and treatment of binary restenosis after vertebral artery stenting

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the major concern of vertebral artery stenting (VAS). We aimed to investigate the feasibility and outcome of redo angioplasty for ISR of vertebral artery.

METHOD

The patients were retrospectively reviewed for the significant ISR (>50%). Redo angioplasty including balloon angioplasty and stenting was performed for symptomatic ISR (>50%) or asymptomatic ISR (≥70%). The clinical follow-up was performed on the 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then yearly in the clinic or by telephone. The angiographic follow-up was performed at 6-12 months after redo angioplasty.

RESULT

A total of 72 patients had significant ISR and 48 redo angioplasty (92.3%, 48/52) were successfully achieved with 13 located in the V4 and 35 in the ostium of vertebral artery. Twenty-six lesions were implanted by the second stent and the others received balloon angioplasty. No stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) occurred in the perioperative time. One patient died 2 months after redo angioplasty due to nonstroke cause. Redo angioplasty nonsignificantly decreased the stroke or TIA compared with medical treatment. Sixteen patients developed the binary restenosis, which was lower in the patients receiving stent implantation than balloon angioplasty.

CONCLUSION

Redo angioplasty was a feasible method for the ISR of VAS and redo stenting might be the first choice.

Outcome of endovascular recanalization for intracranial in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is one of the long-term adverse outcomes of endovascular angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. In this study, we try to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for intracranial ISR.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected patients with intracranial ISR who underwent endovascular treatment from June 2012 to August 2019 at a high-volume stroke center. Successful recanalization was defined as ≤30% residual stenosis. Stroke, myocardial infarction, and death after stenting within 30 days were used to evaluate periprocedural safety. Recurrent stroke in the territory of the culprit vessel and re-ISR in patients with clinical and vascular imaging follow-up data were used to evaluate the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

32 patients (59.6±7.2 years old) with ISR were recruited, including 22 patients (68.8%) treated with balloon dilatation, 8 patients (25%) with stenting, and 2 patients (6.3%) with failed procedures. Successful recanalization was achieved in 71.9% (23/32) of patients. There was no stroke, myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after the procedure. Recurrent stroke was found in 10.7% (3/28) of the patients, and re-ISR was found in 42.1% (8/19) of the patients. The re-ISR rate was lower in patients with stenting than in those with balloon dilatation (0% vs 57.1%, p=0.090), and in patients with successful recanalization than in those with unsuccessful recanalization (33.3% vs 75.0%, p=0.352), but with no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The periprocedural safety of endovascular treatment for intracranial ISR may be acceptable, but the long-term rates of recurrent stroke and re-ISR remain at high levels.

Topographic location of unisolated pontine infarction

BACKGROUND

The topographic location of acute pontine infarction is associated with clinical syndromes and prognosis. Previous studies focused on isolated pontine infarction, but the topographic location of unisolated pontine infarction has remained unclear.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal registry study. Patients with acute pontine infarction confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled. Based on the territory of the pontine artery, the topographic location was divided into anteromedial, anterolateral, tegmental, bilateral and unilateral multiple infarctions.

RESULTS

From May 1, 2003, to Oct 31, 2017, 1003 patients were enrolled, and 330 had unisolated pontine infarction. For isolated pontine infarction, 44.9, 19.8, 16.0, 13.1 and 6.2% of patients had anteromedial, anterolateral, tegmental, bilateral and unilateral multiple pontine infarctions, respectively. For unisolated pontine infarction, 30.3, 19.7, 24.5, 15.2 and 10.3% of patients had anteromedial, anterolateral, tegmental, bilateral and unilateral multiple pontine infarctions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this large series study, our data revealed fewer anteromedial infarctions and more tegmental and unilateral multiple infarctions in patients with unisolated pontine infarction than in patients with isolated pontine infarction.