Efficacy of Atlantoaxial Transarticular Screw Fixation Using Navigation-Guided Drill: Technical Note

The Comparison Between Transarticular Screw Fixation and Segmental Screw-Rod Fixation for Posterior Fusion of the C1-2 Segment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Both transarticular screw fixation (TAS) and segmental screw-rod fixation (SF) have been widely performed for C1-2 fusion; however, just only small clinical studies and a few meta-analyses comparing the 2 surgical techniques for C1-2 posterior fusion have been reported.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases for articles comparing the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of TAS and SF for C1-2 posterior fusion with April 14, 2022, as the publication cutoff date. The odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference were used to analyze differences in outcomes between the 2 abovementioned surgical techniques. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 5101 publications were assessed, and 6 studies were finally included in the study. In terms of the fusion rate, SF produced significantly better outcomes than TAS did (OR = 2.96, P = 0.02). With respect to surgical outcomes, blood loss and operation times were significantly lower in the TAS group than those in the SF group (P = 0.008 and P < 0.00001, respectively). The rate of vertebral artery injury was significantly lower in the SF group than that in the TAS group (OR = 3.95, P = 0.04). However, other complications, such as screw malposition, infection, hardware failure, and nonunion, were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SF showed a greater fusion rate and lower risk of vertebral artery injury than TAS did, but TAS showed less blood loss and lower operation times than SF.

Virtual extensions improve perception-based instrument alignment using optical see-through devices

Instrument alignment is a common task in various surgical interventions using navigation. The goal of the task is to position and orient an instrument as it has been planned preoperatively. To this end, surgeons rely on patient-specific data visualized on screens alongside preplanned trajectories. The purpose of this manuscript is to investigate the effect of instrument visualization/non visualization on alignment tasks, and to compare it with virtual extensions approach which augments the realistic representation of the instrument with simple 3D objects. 18 volunteers performed six alignment tasks under each of the following conditions: no visualization on the instrument; realistic visualization of the instrument; realistic visualization extended with virtual elements (Virtual extensions). The first condition represents an egocentric-based alignment while the two other conditions additionally make use of exocentric depth estimation to perform the alignment. The device used was a see-through device (Microsoft HoloLens 2). The positions of the head and the instrument were acquired during the experiment. Additionally, the users were asked to fill NASA-TLX and SUS forms for each condition. The results show that instrument visualization is essential for a good alignment using see-through devices. Moreover, virtual extensions helped achieve the best performance compared to the other conditions with medians of 2 mm and 2° positional and angular error respectively. Furthermore, the virtual extensions decreased the average head velocity while similarly reducing the frustration levels. Therefore, making use of virtual extensions could facilitate alignment tasks in augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) environments, specifically in AR navigated surgical procedures when using optical see-through devices.

Comparison of Atlantoaxial Fusion with Transarticular Screws and C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Screws Using Intraoperative O-Arm Navigation

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the surgical outcomes of atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws (TASs) and C1 lateral mass-C2 screws (screw-rod constructs [SRCs]) using the intraoperative O-arm navigation system (O-arm).

METHODS

Among a total of 28 patients who underwent atlantoaxial fixation, 13 underwent TAS fixation and 15 underwent SRC fixation using the O-arm. All patients underwent Brooks procedure with iliac bone graft in addition to screw fixation. TAS fixation was performed for cases without high-riding vertebral artery (hVA). In the SRC group, pars or lamina screws were inserted for the side with a C2 hVA. Operative time, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative complications, screw accuracy, and bone union were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in mean operative time between the 2 procedures (166 minutes in the TAS group vs. 212 minutes in the SRC group, P < 0.05) and in mean blood loss (80 vs. 185 mL, respectively; P < 0.01). Two patients developed temporary postoperative occipital neuralgia probably related to C2 nerve root in the SRC group. No screws violated the cortex in either group. Complete bone union was observed in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

O-arm-assisted TAS fixation had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and fewer screw insertion complications than O-arm-assisted SRC fixation. O-arm-assisted TAS fixation is preferable for atlantoaxial fusion in patients without hVA.