Evaluation of Risk of Gastrostomy and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Assessing Safety and Timing of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt and Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Newborns

BACKGROUND

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt placement (VPS) is a common surgical procedure for treating newborns with hydrocephalus. Due to poor feeding, these patients often require a gastrostomy tube (GT). There is controversy regarding safety and outcomes when patients require a VPS and GT.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was queried from 2016 to 2020 for newborns who underwent VPS placement during newborn hospitalization. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between those also requiring GT placement to those undergoing VPS alone. The timing of surgeries was also investigated.

RESULTS

4012 patients met inclusion criteria: 597 patients with VPS + GT placement and 3415 received only a VPS. Those undergoing VPS + GT had an increased proportion of shunt infection (3.2 % vs. 1.1 %) and mechanical complications (5.4 % vs. 0.7 %), often necessitating early removal (17 % vs. 12 %), all p < 0.05. The readmission rate was higher in those with VPS + GT, as were overall shunt complications upon readmission (11 % vs. 8 %, p = 0026). Regarding the timing of VPS and GT, those undergoing GT before VPS had higher rates of shunt and wound complications in newborn hospitalization, as well as shunt and GT complications upon readmission.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide retrospective cohort analysis, placement of gastrostomy tubes during the same hospitalization as ventriculoperitoneal shunts increased shunt complications. In addition, the timing of shunt placement was found to be more favorable before gastrostomy placement. These findings should be considered for patients requiring both procedures.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Modifiable Preoperative Risk Factors to Mitigate Postoperative Site Infection Following Pediatric Gastrostomy

PURPOSE

There are limited studies assessing modifiable preoperative risk factors for pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes (LGT) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. We sought to evaluate the effect of demographics and surgical/infectious history on the superficial infection rate following gastrostomy tube (GT) placement.

METHODS

After IRB approval, we conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2021 of pediatric patients undergoing LGT or PEG tube. The primary outcome was cellulitis or abscess formation within 30-days and 90-days postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with t-tests, Chi-squared, and logistic regression(p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

There were 382 patients, with 181 (47%) LGT and 201 (53%) PEGs. LGT patients were younger (5.9 vs. 12.3 months, p < 0.001) and more likely to be admitted to the neonatal or cardiac intensive care unit prior to their GT. There were similar rates of prior surgical intervention (58% vs. 66%, p = 0.29) and previous infection (37% vs. 38%, p = 0.87) in both LGT and PEG patients. Within 30-days postoperatively, LGT patients had a higher superficial infection rate (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.04). On multivariate regression, Black race (Odds Ratio 0.10, p = 0.03) was protective and prior Staphylococcus colonization (OR 2.35, p = 0.04) increased the odds of infection. In those patients colonized with Staphylococcus, 21% developed a superficial site infection compared to 9% in those not colonized (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest prior Staphylococcus colonization is a significant risk factor for superficial infection following GT. Further work into preoperative decolonization strategies may provide an avenue to decrease the high infection rate in this common pediatric procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Gastrostomy Sequence With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting-Does It Matter?

BACKGROUND

Neurological injury requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement often necessitates gastrostomy for nutritional support. The sequence of these procedures is debated over concerns for shunt infection and displacement requiring revisional surgery as a consequence of gastrostomy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal sequence of VPS shunt and gastrostomy tube placement in adults.

METHODS

In an all-payer database, adult patients undergoing gastrostomy and VPS placement were identified within 15 days between January 2010 and October 2021. Patients were categorized as receiving gastrostomy before, on the same day as, or after shunt placement. The primary outcomes of this study were rates of revision and infection. All outcomes were evaluated within 30 months after index shunting.

RESULTS

In total, 3015 patients were identified as undergoing VPS and gastrostomy procedures within 15 days. After a 1:1:1 match, 1080 patient records were analyzed. Revision rates at 30 months were significantly lower among patients who received VPS and gastrostomy procedures on the same day compared with gastrostomy after VPS (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). In addition, patients who received gastrostomy before VPS compared with those after had lower revision rates (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96) and infection (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.99). No significant differences were noted in mechanical complication or shunt displacement rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients requiring VPS and gastrostomy may benefit from undergoing both procedures concurrently or with gastrostomy before VPS placement, secondary to lower revision rates. Patients undergoing gastrostomy before VPS have the added benefit of decreased infection rates.

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt and Gastrostomy Tube Placement and Timing: A Database Analysis

Background Debate exists about the safety of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in the presence of a gastrostomy tube and the timing of these procedures from each other. Using a large database, we sought to determine the rates of shunt infection and revision in patients who had both devices placed, based on the timing between procedures. Methods We performed a retrospective database analysis using a multi-institutional database (TriNetX), looking at all patients diagnosed with gastrostomy tube with subsequent ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement and vice-versa. We also evaluated patients who had gastrostomy tubes and shunts placed at the same time. We categorized cohorts into patients with device placement after 1-10 days, 11-30 days, and after one month of the other. Our primary endpoints were shunt infection and shunt revision. Results Patients who had same-day gastrostomy tube and shunt placement had a shunt infection rate of 10.06% within five years, and 14.53% had a shunt revision. With prior shunting and subsequent gastrostomy tube placement within 1-10 days, 12.18% had shunt infections, and 17.88% had shunt revisions; for those who had subsequent gastrostomy tube placement within 11-30 days, shunt infections were seen in 10.57%, and shunt revisions in 19.41%; gastrostomy tube placement after one month or longer of shunt placement resulted in 15.39% of patients having shunt infections and 17.73% with shunt revision. Prior gastrostomy tube patients with subsequent shunt placement, within 1-10 days had shunt infection rates of 8.27% and revision rates of 14.39%; for shunt placement within 11-30 days, shunt infections were seen in 10.82%, and shunt revisions were done in 14.33% of patients; for shunt placement after one month or longer, shunt infection rate was 11.68%, and revision rate was 16.80%. Conclusions Our results demonstrate no significant difference in shunt infection rates and shunt revision rates between same-day gastrostomy tube and shunt placement versus placement within 1-10 days, 11-30 days, or any time after one month from one another.