Cell-type specificity of the human mutation landscape with respect to DNA replication dynamics

APOBEC3B Does Not Promote Tumor Progression in Tp53 Hemizygous Mice

BACKGROUND

DNA cytosine deaminase APOBEC3B (A3B) is one of the endogenous sources of somatic mutations in many types of human cancers and is associated with tumor progression rather than tumorigenesis. However, it remains uncertain whether APOBEC3B-induced mutations accelerate tumor progression or not. In this paper, we established a mouse model with A3B overexpression and investigated whether the introduction of A3B overexpression accelerates tumor development in Tp53 hemizygous mice.

METHODS

We established A3B transgenic mouse by microinjection and selected the mouse which has only one A3B transgene by genomic qPCR and southern blotting using the probe against the transgene. A3B expression was validated by qPCR, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry and in vitro CDA assays using lysates of this transgenic mouse liver, spleen and bone marrow. We interbreed this transgenic mouse model with CAG-Cre and Tp53 knockout mice and observed differences in tumor progression and survival between Tp53 hemizygous mice and Tp53 homozygous mice irrespective of A3B expression. Finally, comprehensive genomic mutation analysis was done using the developed tumors.

RESULTS

We established A3B transgenic mouse which has only one transgene. A3B expression and its CDA activity were confirmed in liver cells and tumor tissues of mice overexpressing A3B. Tp53 hemizygous mice developed osteosarcomas, spindle and pleomorphic sarcomas, and squamous cell carcinomas, however we did not observe any difference in tumor development between the mice with or without A3B expression. The tumor with A3B expression has more high-VAF mutations than the one without A3B, but these mutations are not APOBEC signature.

CONCLUSION

We developed a Cre inducible A3B transgenic mouse model bearing single copy of A3B gene. Although the introduction of A3B overexpression did not accelerate tumor development in Tp53 hemizygous mice, our mouse model with A3B overexpression is well-validated and useful for further research.

The clock-like accumulation of germline and somatic mutations can arise from the interplay of DNA damage and repair

The rates at which mutations accumulate across human cell types vary. To identify causes of this variation, mutations are often decomposed into a combination of the single-base substitution (SBS) "signatures" observed in germline, soma, and tumors, with the idea that each signature corresponds to one or a small number of underlying mutagenic processes. Two such signatures turn out to be ubiquitous across cell types: SBS signature 1, which consists primarily of transitions at methylated CpG sites thought to be caused by spontaneous deamination, and the more diffuse SBS signature 5, which is of unknown etiology. In cancers, the number of mutations attributed to these 2 signatures accumulates linearly with age of diagnosis, and thus the signatures have been termed "clock-like." To better understand this clock-like behavior, we develop a mathematical model that includes DNA replication errors, unrepaired damage, and damage repaired incorrectly. We show that mutational signatures can exhibit clock-like behavior because cell divisions occur at a constant rate and/or because damage rates remain constant over time, and that these distinct sources can be teased apart by comparing cell lineages that divide at different rates. With this goal in mind, we analyze the rate of accumulation of mutations in multiple cell types, including soma as well as male and female germline. We find no detectable increase in SBS signature 1 mutations in neurons and only a very weak increase in mutations assigned to the female germline, but a significant increase with time in rapidly dividing cells, suggesting that SBS signature 1 is driven by rounds of DNA replication occurring at a relatively fixed rate. In contrast, SBS signature 5 increases with time in all cell types, including postmitotic ones, indicating that it accumulates independently of cell divisions; this observation points to errors in DNA repair as the key underlying mechanism. Thus, the two "clock-like" signatures observed across cell types likely have distinct origins, one set by rates of cell division, the other by damage rates.

Tissue-Predisposition to Cancer Driver Mutations

Driver mutations are considered the cornerstone of cancer initiation. They are defined as mutations that convey a competitive fitness advantage, and hence, their mutation frequency in premalignant tissue is expected to exceed the basal mutation rate. In old terms, that translates to "the survival of the fittest" and implies that a selective process underlies the frequency of cancer driver mutations. In that sense, each tissue is its own niche that creates a molecular selective pressure that may favor the propagation of a mutation or not. At the heart of this stands one of the biggest riddles in cancer biology: the tissue-predisposition to cancer driver mutations. The frequency of cancer driver mutations among tissues is non-uniform: for instance, mutations in APC are particularly frequent in colorectal cancer, and 99% of chronic myeloid leukemia patients harbor the driver BCR-ABL1 fusion mutation, which is rarely found in solid tumors. Here, we provide a mechanistic framework that aims to explain how tissue-specific features, ranging from epigenetic underpinnings to the expression of viral transposable elements, establish a molecular basis for selecting cancer driver mutations in a tissue-specific manner.

Disentangling sources of clock-like mutations in germline and soma

The rates of mutations vary across cell types. To identify causes of this variation, mutations are often decomposed into a combination of the single base substitution (SBS) "signatures" observed in germline, soma and tumors, with the idea that each signature corresponds to one or a small number of underlying mutagenic processes. Two such signatures turn out to be ubiquitous across cell types: SBS signature 1, which consists primarily of transitions at methylated CpG sites caused by spontaneous deamination, and the more diffuse SBS signature 5, which is of unknown etiology. In cancers, the number of mutations attributed to these two signatures accumulates linearly with age of diagnosis, and thus the signatures have been termed "clock-like." To better understand this clock-like behavior, we develop a mathematical model that includes DNA replication errors, unrepaired damage, and damage repaired incorrectly. We show that mutational signatures can exhibit clock-like behavior because cell divisions occur at a constant rate and/or because damage rates remain constant over time, and that these distinct sources can be teased apart by comparing cell lineages that divide at different rates. With this goal in mind, we analyze the rate of accumulation of mutations in multiple cell types, including soma as well as male and female germline. We find no detectable increase in SBS signature 1 mutations in neurons and only a very weak increase in mutations assigned to the female germline, but a significant increase with time in rapidly-dividing cells, suggesting that SBS signature 1 is driven by rounds of DNA replication occurring at a relatively fixed rate. In contrast, SBS signature 5 increases with time in all cell types, including post-mitotic ones, indicating that it accumulates independently of cell divisions; this observation points to errors in DNA repair as the key underlying mechanism. Thus, the two "clock-like" signatures observed across cell types likely have distinct origins, one set by rates of cell division, the other by damage rates.

The landscape of somatic mutations in lymphoblastoid cell lines

Somatic mutations have important biological ramifications while exerting substantial rate, type, and genomic location heterogeneity. Yet, their sporadic occurrence makes them difficult to study at scale and across individuals. Lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), a model system for human population and functional genomics, harbor large numbers of somatic mutations and have been extensively genotyped. By comparing 1,662 LCLs, we report that the mutational landscape of the genome varies across individuals in terms of the number of mutations, their genomic locations, and their spectra; this variation may itself be modulated by somatic trans-acting mutations. Mutations attributed to the translesion DNA polymerase η follow two different modes of formation, with one mode accounting for the hypermutability of the inactive X chromosome. Nonetheless, the distribution of mutations along the inactive X chromosome appears to follow an epigenetic memory of the active form.