The influence of comorbidities on the treatment outcome in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigating the Effect of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) Surgery on Sexual Function in Male Patients over 50 Years

Background and Objectives: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of back surgery in elderly individuals. Additionally, LSS can result in buttock pain; abnormal sensations; or even loss of sensation in the thighs, feet, legs, and buttocks, as well as potential loss of bowel and bladder control. As a further consequence, sexual activity is impaired. However, there is limited information on sexual function in patients undergoing LSS surgery, in general, and among male patients, in specific. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LSS surgery on sexual function in male patients over 50 years. Materials and Methods: Participants were fifty male patients with LSS aged 50 years and older who underwent LSS surgery at the Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah from March 2024 to the end of 2024. To assess sexual performance over time, participants completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) questionnaire both before LSS surgery and six months after LSS surgery. For pre-post comparison, we used paired t-tests. Results: Compared to the pre-surgery stage, six-month post-surgery improvements were erectile function (+21%; Cohen's d: 1.40), orgasmic function (+35.1%; Cohen's d: 1.49), sexual desire (+27.3%; Cohen's d: 1.48), intercourse satisfaction (+14% Cohen's d: 0.77), overall satisfaction (+34.6% Cohen's d: 1.74), and overall sexual function (+25.3%; Cohen's d: 1.48). Conclusions: Among a sample of male patients aged 50 years and older, LSS surgery improved all dimensions of sexual satisfaction, including orgasmic, erectile, and sexual functions; sexual desire; intercourse satisfaction; and overall satisfaction. Medical doctors treating males with LSS might consider informing their patients about the favorable effects of LSS surgery on sexual life and sexual satisfaction.

The impact of preoperative handgrip strength on postoperative outcomes following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND

With an aging population, the prevalence of lumbar spinal diseases necessitating surgical intervention is increasing. Handgrip strength (HGS) has emerged as a simple measure of muscle function that may correlate with surgical outcomes. However, the role of HGS concerning postoperative recovery following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is not well-studied, highlighting a gap in the literature regarding its potential as a prognostic tool.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 89 patients who underwent TLIF performed by a single surgeon. Patients were categorized into normal and low HGS groups based on preoperative HGS measurements. Demographics, baseline HGS, and surgical details were recorded, and outcomes were assessed using the JOA, EQ-5D-3L, and Barthel Index at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to examine associations between baseline parameters and outcomes over time.

RESULTS

All patients were followed for at least one year, except for 15 (15.6%) who were lost to follow-up before the one-year mark. Patients with lower preoperative HGS were associated with significantly poorer postoperative functional outcomes. Specifically, a one-unit decrease in HGS was associated with a 2.551-point decrease in the JOA score (p = 0.008), a 0.142-point decrease in the EQ-5D-3L score (p = 0.007), and a 5.784-point decrease in the Barthel Index (p = 0.036). Additionally, male sex, higher body mass index, and lower Charlson comorbidity index were associated with better postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Low preoperative handgrip strength is associated with poorer functional, quality of life, and independence outcomes up to 12 months after TLIF surgery. Assessing HGS preoperatively may provide clinicians with valuable information for identifying patients at risk of suboptimal recovery. Future research could explore intervention strategies to improve preoperative muscle function and potentially enhance recovery outcomes for patients undergoing TLIF.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Biomechanics, and Innovations in Diagnosis and Management

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition caused by the narrowing of the spinal canal, resulting in compression of neural and vascular structures. This compression leads to symptoms such as claudication, paresthesia, and lower extremity weakness. LSS is the leading cause of low back pain and functional limitations, affecting over 103 million people worldwide. Degenerative changes, including ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet joint osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc degeneration, are the primary contributors to LSS. Additional factors, such as genetic predisposition, congenital abnormalities, and autoimmune conditions, are also emerging as contributors. A major challenge in managing LSS lies in differentiating it from other causes of neurogenic symptoms and low back pain while devising an appropriate treatment plan from the wide array of conservative and surgical options available. Minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as lumbar spinous process-splitting laminoplasty and partial facetectomy, are often compared to the gold standard laminectomy with or without fusion. Surgical interventions offer significant improvements in pain relief, disability, and quality of life within 3-6 months; however, these benefits often diminish after 2-4 years. Contrasting evidence demonstrates that long-term outcomes of non-surgical treatments, such as physical therapy, pharmacological management, and lifestyle modifications, are often comparable to surgical modalities. Emerging therapies, including interspinous devices and stem cell therapy, show promise but require further research. Managing LSS requires a multidisciplinary approach tailored to patient-specific factors, including age, comorbidities, and functional goals. Future research should aim to improve diagnostic accuracy, refine surgical techniques, and explore innovative therapies to enhance outcomes for patients with LSS.

Lumbar Decompression versus Decompression and Fusion in Octogenarians: Complications and Clinical Course With 3-Year Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical course and complications between surgical decompression and decompression with fusion in lumbar spine patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review of electronic medical records at a single institution was conducted between September 2005 and December 2021. Logistic regression was used to identify potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Over a 16-year period, 327 patients were allocated to the decompression only group and 89 patients were allocated to the decompression and instrumented fusion group. The study had a mean follow-up duration of 36.7 ± 12.4 months. When assessing the CCI, patients of the instrumentation group had fewer comorbidities (8.9 ± .5 points vs 6.2 ± 1.5 points; P < .001), significantly longer surgical duration (290 ± 106 minutes vs 145 ±50.2 minutes; P < .001), significantly higher volume of intraoperative blood loss (791 ± 319.3 ml vs 336.1 ± 150.8 ml; P < .001), more frequent intraoperative blood transfusion (7 ± 2.1% vs 16± 18.0%; P < .001), and extended stays in the intensive care unit and hospitalization rates. Logistic regression analysis revealed that surgical duration and extent of surgery were unique risk factors for the occurrence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar decompression and additional fusion in octogenarians are considerable treatment techniques; albeit associated with increased complication risks. Prolonged operative time and extent of surgery are critical confounding factors associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. Surgery should only be performed after careful outweighing of potential benefits and risks.

Incidence of subsequent surgical decompression following minimally invasive approaches to treat lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical decompression is the definitive treatment for managing symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis; however, select patients are poor surgical candidates. Consequently, minimally invasive procedures have gained popularity, but there exists the potential for failure of therapy necessitating eventual surgical decompression.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of patients who require surgical decompression following minimally invasive procedures to treat lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent minimally invasive procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis (Percutaneous Image-guided Lumbar Decompression [PILD] or interspinous spacer device [ISD]) and progressed to subsequent surgical decompression within 5 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of surgical decompression within 5 years following the minimally invasive approach. Secondary outcomes included demographic and comorbid factors associated with increased odds of requiring subsequent surgery.

METHODS

Patient data were collected using the PearlDiver-Mariner database. The rate of subsequent decompression was described as a percentage while univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used for the analysis of predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 5278 patients were included, of which 3222 (61.04%) underwent PILD, 1959 (37.12%) underwent ISD placement, and 97 (1.84%) had claims for both procedures. Overall, the incidence of subsequent surgical decompression within 5 years was 6.56% (346 of 5278 patients). Variables associated with a significantly greater odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of requiring subsequent surgical decompression included male gender and a prior history of surgical decompression by 1.42 ([1.14, 1.77], p = 0.002) and 2.10 times ([1.39, 3.17], p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, age 65 years and above, a diagnosis of obesity, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of three or greater were associated with a significantly reduced OR [95% CI] by 0.64 ([0.50, 0.81], p < 0.001), 0.62 ([0.48, 0.81], p < 0.001), and 0.71 times ([0.56, 0.91], p = 0.007), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive procedures may provide an additional option to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis in patients who are poor surgical candidates or who do not desire open decompression; however, there still exists a subset of patients who will require subsequent surgical decompression. Factors such as gender and prior surgical decompression increase the likelihood of subsequent surgery, while older age, obesity, and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score reduce it. These findings aid in selecting suitable surgical candidates for better outcomes in the elderly population with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Design: This was a retrospective observational study that assessed the clinical outcome of ageing patients who received ultrasound-guided (USG) mechanical needling with sterile water injection. In addition, the clinical outcome of age-and gender matched patients randomly selected from patients who received needling with sterile water was compared to the patients injected with lidocaine in a 1:1 ratio.Objective: This present study aimed to explore the clinical effects of USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).Methods: The data was extracted from the medical records of ageing patients with LSS who received USG injection at the lumbosacral spine by the first author. Low back pain or axial pain, and leg pain or radicular pain were assessed by the visual analogue scale, and gait ability with walking distance were obtained at six different time points.Results: A total of 4328 medical records were examined. Four thousand two hundred and twenty-eight ageing patients received mechanical needling with sterile water injection and found the efficacy lasted up to 6 months. One hundred patients were compared with 100 patients who received lidocaine injection. Those who received lidocaine had pain returned at 3 months and 6 months post-injection.Conclusions: USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection could help relieve axial and radicular pain for at least 6 months. Removal of calcification and fibrosis as well as reduction of sensitization are all possible mechanisms.

Correction of Spinal Sagittal Alignment after Posterior Lumbar Decompression: Does Severity of Central Canal Stenosis Matter?

STUDY DESIGN

This study adopted a retrospective study design.

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to investigate the impact of central canal stenosis severity on surgical outcomes and lumbar sagittal correction after lumbar decompression.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Studies have evaluated sagittal correction in patients with central canal stenosis after lumbar decompression and the association of stenosis severity with worse preoperative sagittal alignment. However, none have evaluated the impact of spinal stenosis severity on sagittal correction.

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression (PLD) of ≤4 levels were divided into severe and non-severe central canal stenosis groups based on the Lee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading system. Patients without preoperative MRI or inadequate visualization on radiographs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and sagittal measurements were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors of pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL).

RESULTS

Of the 142 patients included, 39 had severe stenosis, and 103 had non-severe stenosis. The mean follow-up duration for the cohort was 4.72 months. Patients with severe stenosis were older, had higher comorbidity indices and levels decompressed, and longer lengths of stay and operative times (p <0.001). Although those with severe stenosis had lower lordosis, lower SS, and higher PI-LL mismatch preoperatively, no differences in Delta LL, SS, PT, or PI-LL were observed between the two groups (p >0.05). On multivariate regression, severe stenosis was a significant predictor of a lower preoperative LL (estimate=-5.243, p =0.045) and a higher preoperative PI-LL mismatch (estimate=6.192, p =0.039). No differences in surgical or clinical outcomes were observed (p >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Severe central lumbar stenosis was associated with greater spinopelvic mismatch preoperatively. Sagittal balance improved in both patients with severe and non-severe stenosis after PLD to a similar degree, with differences in sagittal parameters remaining after surgery. We also found no differences in postoperative outcomes associated with stenosis severity.

Comparing 30-Day Outcomes After Emergent Spine Procedures Performed "During Hours" vs "After Hours"

BACKGROUND

Spinal injuries, whether mechanical or neurological, frequently require urgent intervention. Superior outcomes are associated with earlier intervention, which often requires operating overnight and on weekends. However, operating after hours has been associated with increased risks of complications in selected studies. The authors sought to determine whether there are differences in outcomes for "after hours" surgery compared with "during hours" surgery for spinal emergencies.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of spine surgery patients who underwent urgent surgery within 6 hours, from January 2015 through December 2019. Surgery was considered during hours if it started between 8 am and 5 pm Monday through Friday. After hours was defined as from 5 pm through 8 am on a weekday or Saturday or Sunday. We assessed 30-day outcome measures for differences between operations performed during hours or after hours.

RESULTS

There were 241 spine procedures performed (49 during hours and 192 after hours). There was no significant difference between the length of operation (145.3 vs 129.8 minutes, P = 0.29), estimated blood loss (303.9 vs 274.4 mL, P = 0.61), improvement in American Spinal Injury Association scale (0.26 vs 0.24 grade, P = 0.85), 30-day return to the operating room (OR; 14.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.09), 30-day readmission (2.0% vs 6.3% P = 0.24), intensive care unit length of stay (4.6 vs 6.3 days, P = 0.27), hospital length of stay (13.5 days vs 14.2 days, P = 0.72), or 30-day mortality (4.1% vs 7.3%, P = 0.42) for cases performed during hours compared with those after hours, respectively. On multivariate analysis, prior malignancy (P = 0.008) and blue immediate status (P = 0.004) were predictors of 30-day mortality. However, "after hours" surgery was not a predictor of 30-day return to the OR, readmission, or mortality in either univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine surgery must often be performed after hours. However, the time of day does not significantly impact the 30-day outcomes for emergent spine surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Surgery rates for lumbar spinal stenosis in Denmark between 2002 and 2018: a registry-based study of 43,454 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Over the last decades, many countries have shown increased surgery rates for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), but little information is available from Denmark. We describe the development in diagnosis and surgery of LSS in Denmark between 2002 and 2018.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected diagnostic ICD10-codes and surgical procedure codes from private and public hospitals in Denmark from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients diagnosed with LSS and those with surgical procedure codes for decompression surgery with or without fusion were identified. Annual surgery rates were stratified by age, sex, and type of surgery.

RESULTS

During these 17 years, 132,138 patients diagnosed with LSS and 43,454 surgical procedures for LSS were identified. The number of surgical procedures increased by 144%, from 23 to 56 per 100,000 inhabitants. The proportion of patients diagnosed with LSS who received surgery was about 33%, which was almost stable over time. Decompression without fusion increased by 128% from 18 to 40 per 100,000 inhabitants and decompression with fusion increased by 199%, from 5 to 15 per 100,000.

INTERPRETATION

Both the prevalence of LSS diagnoses and LSS surgery rates more than doubled in Denmark between 2002 and 2018. However, the proportion of patients diagnosed with LSS who received surgery remained stable. Decompression surgery with fusion increased at a higher rate than decompression without fusion, although recent evidence suggests no advantage of decompression plus fusion over decompression alone.