Functional conserved non-coding elements among tunicates and chordates

Deuterostome Ancestors and Chordate Origins

The Deuterostomia are a monophyletic group, consisting of the Ambulacraria, with two phyla, Hemichordata and Echinodermata, and the phylum Chordata, containing the subphyla Cephalochordata (lancelets or Amphioxus), Tunicata (Urochordata), and Vertebrata. Hemichordates and echinoderms are sister groups and are critical for understanding the deuterostome ancestor and the origin and evolution of the chordates within the deuterostomes. Enteropneusta, worm-like hemichordates, share many chordate features as adults, including a post-anal tail, gill slits, and a central nervous system (CNS) that deploys similar developmental genetic regulatory networks (GRNs). Genomic comparisons show that cephalochordates share synteny and a vermiform body plan similar to vertebrates, but phylogenomic analyses place tunicates as the sister group of vertebrates. Tunicates have a U-shaped gut and a very different adult body plan than the rest of the chordates, and all tunicates have small genomes and many gene losses, although the GRNs underlying specific tissues, such as notochord and muscle, are conserved. Echinoderms and vertebrates have extensive fossil records, with fewer specimens found for tunicates and enteropneusts, or worm-like hemichordates. The data is mounting that the deuterostome ancestor was a complex benthic worm, with gill slits, a cartilaginous skeleton, and a CNS. Two extant groups, echinoderms and tunicates, have evolved highly derived body plans, remarkably different than the deuterostome ancestor. We review the current genomic and GRN data on the different groups of deuterostomes' characters to re-evaluate different hypotheses of chordate origins. Notochord loss in echinoderms and hemichordates is as parsimonious as notochord gain in the chordates but has implications for the deuterostome ancestor. The chordate ancestor lost an ancestral nerve net, retained the CNS, and evolved neural crest cells.

Developmental and evolutionary comparative analysis of a regulatory landscape in mouse and chicken

Modifications in gene regulation are driving forces in the evolution of organisms. Part of these changes involve cis-regulatory elements (CREs), which contact their target genes through higher-order chromatin structures. However, how such architectures and variations in CREs contribute to transcriptional evolvability remains elusive. We use Hoxd genes as a paradigm for the emergence of regulatory innovations, as many relevant enhancers are located in a regulatory landscape highly conserved in amniotes. Here, we analysed their regulation in murine vibrissae and chicken feather primordia, two skin appendages expressing different Hoxd gene subsets, and compared the regulation of these genes in these appendages with that in the elongation of the posterior trunk. In the two former structures, distinct subsets of Hoxd genes are contacted by different lineage-specific enhancers, probably as a result of using an ancestral chromatin topology as an evolutionary playground, whereas the gene regulation that occurs in the mouse and chicken embryonic trunk partially relies on conserved CREs. A high proportion of these non-coding sequences active in the trunk have functionally diverged between species, suggesting that transcriptional robustness is maintained, despite considerable divergence in enhancer sequences.

Summary: Analyses of the relationships between chromatin architecture and regulatory activities at the HoxD locus show that ancestral transcription patterns can be maintained while new regulations evolve.

The Degenerate Tale of Ascidian Tails

Ascidians are invertebrate chordates, with swimming chordate tadpole larvae that have distinct heads and tails. The head contains the small brain, sensory organs, including the ocellus (light) and otolith (gravity) and the presumptive endoderm, while the tail has a notochord surrounded by muscle cells and a dorsal nerve cord. One of the chordate features is a post-anal tail. Ascidian tadpoles are nonfeeding, and their tails are critical for larval locomotion. After hatching the larvae swim up toward light and are carried by the tide and ocean currents. When competent to settle, ascidian tadpole larvae swim down, away from light, to settle and metamorphose into a sessile adult. Tunicates are classified as chordates because of their chordate tadpole larvae; in contrast, the sessile adult has a U-shaped gut and very derived body plan, looking nothing like a chordate. There is one group of ascidians, the Molgulidae, where many species are known to have tailless larvae. The Swalla Lab has been studying the evolution of tailless ascidian larvae in this clade for over 30 years and has shown that tailless larvae have evolved independently several times in this clade. Comparison of the genomes of two closely related species, the tailed Molgula oculata and tailless Molgula occulta reveals much synteny, but there have been multiple insertions and deletions that have disrupted larval genes in the tailless species. Genomics and transcriptomics have previously shown that there are pseudogenes expressed in the tailless embryos, suggesting that the partial rescue of tailed features in their hybrid larvae is due to the expression of intact genes from the tailed parent. Yet surprisingly, we find that the notochord gene regulatory network is mostly intact in the tailless M. occulta, although the notochord does not converge and extend and remains as an aggregate of cells we call the "notoball." We expect that eventually many of the larval gene networks will become evolutionarily lost in tailless ascidians and the larval body plan abandoned, with eggs developing directly into an adult. Here we review the current evolutionary and developmental evidence on how the molgulids lost their tails.

Transphyletic conservation of nitric oxide synthase regulation in cephalochordates and tunicates

Nitric oxide synthase is ubiquitously present in metazoans and is involved in a wide range of biological processes. Three distinct Nos genes have been so far identified in vertebrates exhibiting a complex expression pattern and transcriptional regulation. Nevertheless, although independent events of Nos duplication have been observed in several taxa, only few studies described the regulatory mechanisms responsible for their activation in non-vertebrate animals. To shed light on the mechanisms underlying neuronal-type Nos expression, we focused on two non-vertebrate chordates: the cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum and the tunicate Ciona robusta. Here, throughout transphyletic and transgenic approaches, we identified genomic regions in both species acting as Nos functional enhancers during development. In vivo analyses of Nos genomic fragments revealed their ability to recapitulate the endogenous expression territories. Therefore, our results suggest the existence of evolutionary conserved mechanisms responsible for neuronal-type Nos regulation in non-vertebrate chordates. In conclusion, this study paves the way for future characterization of conserved transcriptional logic underlying the expression of neuronal-type Nos genes in chordates.