The impact of antidepressants on seizure frequency and depressive and anxiety disorders of patients with epilepsy: Is it worth investigating?

Management of anhedonia after epilepsy surgery

Anhedonia is clinically defined as difficulty or inability to feel pleasure or to be motivated to perform activities that were previously pleasurable. Anhedonia is a core feature of depressive disorders but can be present in other conditions such as substance use and anxiety disorders. Herein we report the case of a 34-year-old female who developed marked anhedonia after left cortico-amygdalohippocampectomy. Despite optimal seizure control, the person struggled with anhedonia and other depressive symptoms. After ruling out medico-neurologic complications, she was prescribed with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Anhedonia can be a challenging neuropsychiatric presentation that requires ruling out the effects of antiseizure medications, neurosurgery, and other drugs before prescribing antidepressants.

Mood disorders in adults with epilepsy: a review of unrecognized facts and common misconceptions

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic conditions. Its clinical manifestations are not restricted to seizures but often include cognitive disturbances and psychiatric disorders. Prospective population-based studies have shown that people with epilepsy have an increased risk of developing mood disorders, and people with a primary mood disorder have an increased risk of developing epilepsy. The existence of common pathogenic mechanisms in epilepsy and mood disorders may explain the bidirectional relation between these two conditions. Recognition of a personal and family psychiatric history at the time of evaluation of people for a seizure disorder is critical in the selection of antiseizure medications: those with mood-stabilizing properties (e.g., lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine) should be favoured as a first option in those with a positive history while those with negative psychotropic properties (e.g., levetiracetam, topiramate) avoided. While mood disorders may be clinically identical in people with epilepsy, they often present with atypical manifestations that do not meet ICD or DSM diagnostic criteria. Failure to treat mood disorders in epilepsy may have a negative impact, increasing suicide risk and iatrogenic effects of antiseizure medications and worsening quality of life. Treating mood disorders in epilepsy is identical to those with primary mood disorders. Yet, there is a common misconception that antidepressants have proconvulsant properties. Most antidepressants are safe when prescribed at therapeutic doses. The incidence of seizures is lower in people randomized to antidepressants than placebo in multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trials of people treated for a primary mood disorder. Thus, there is no excuse not to prescribe antidepressant medications to people with epilepsy.

Clinical side-effects based drug repositioning for anti-epileptic activity

Several generations of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are available but have several associated side effects apart from a limited success rate. Drug repositioning strategies have gained importance in the last two decades owing to lower failure rates and economic burden. Drugs with similar side effect profiles may share a common mechanism of action and thus can be linked to other disease treatments. The present study was carried out to identify the newly approved drug candidate(s) as AEDs using clinical side-effects drug repositioning strategy. The clinical side effect similarity of drugs available in the SIDER v4.1 database was estimated against common side effects of 5 major marketed AEDs, using the 'dplyr' package library in the R. Further drugs were filtered based on Blood Brain Barrier permeability prediction and FDA-approval status. Molecular docking studies were performed for selected 26 hits (drugs) against previously identified epilepsy target receptors: Voltage-gated sodium channel α2 (Nav1.2), GABA receptor α1-β1 (GABAr α1-β1), and Voltage-gated calcium channel α-1 G (Cav3.1). Only 2 drugs (Ziprasidone and Paroxetine) showed better binding affinities against studied epilepsy receptors Nav1.2, GABAr α1-β1, and Cav3.1, than their corresponding standard AEDs, i.e. Carbamazepine, Clonazepam, and Pregabalin, respectively. Ziprasidone reportedly showed seizure-like symptoms in ∼3% of patients and was hence omitted from further study. The MDS study of docked complexes of Paroxetine with selected epilepsy target receptors showed stable RMSD values and better interaction energies. The study reveals Paroxetine as a potential candidate to be repurposed for 1st line epileptic seizure medication.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Epilepsy is more than a simple seizure disorder: Parallels between human and canine cognitive and behavioural comorbidities

Psychiatric and cognitive comorbidities have been known to play a major role in human epilepsy for a long time. People with epilepsy (PWE) frequently express signs of varying psychiatric and cognitive disorders affecting their quality and quantity of life (QoL/QaoL). Over the last few years, research on behavioural comorbidities and their effect on the underlying disease have been performed in canine epilepsy. The following article reviews manifestations of comorbidities in canine epilepsy with an emphasis on patterns of clinical signs and their effects on QoL and QaoL. Cognitive and behavioural alterations in epileptic dogs are mainly represented by fear-/anxiety related behaviour and cognitive impairment (CI). Reduced trainability and altered reactions to daily situations are common results of comorbid changes posing obstacles in everyday life of owners and their dog. In addition, clinical signs similar to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in humans have been reported. Canine attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-like (c-ADHD-like) behaviour should, however, be evaluated critically, as there are no official criteria for diagnosis of ADHD or ADHD-like behaviour in dogs, and some of the reported signs of c-ADHD-like behaviour could be confused with anxiety-associated behaviour. Many intrinsic and extrinsic factors could potentially influence the development of behavioural and cognitive comorbidities in canine epilepsy. In particular, seizure frequency/severity, signalment and factors concerning disease management, such as pharmacotherapy and nutrition, are closely linked with the presence of the aforementioned comorbid disorders. Further studies of behavioural alterations in epileptic dogs are needed to comprehend the complexity of clinical signs and their multifactorial origin.

Panic disorder in epilepsy

A 51-year-old woman showed structural epilepsy following an atypical, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage in the right frontal area. Despite successful seizure control with lamotrigine, she developed severe morning anxiety and panic attacks, leading to agoraphobia, social withdrawal, and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neuropsychiatric and psychological assessments confirmed an anxiety disorder with no significant symptoms of depression. The patient received various psychopharmacological treatments with limited success. This case report illustrates that managing panic disorder in patients with structural epilepsy requires a comprehensive treatment approach that includes pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Differential diagnosis and accurate treatment are crucial because of the symptom overlap between panic attacks and peri-ictal fear. Screenings instruments such as the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) can aid in assessing anxiety-related symptoms. First-line pharmacotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, especially sertraline, or venlafaxine can effectively reduce panic attacks and can be recommended in patients with epilepsy. Psychotherapy, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, is the treatment of choice. Referral to a psychiatrist is indicated when symptoms are severe or refractory to treatment.

Clinical and economic implications of epilepsy management across treatment lines in Spain: a real-life database analysis

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a chronic brain disease characterized by recurrent seizures. We investigated real-world management of epilepsy across treatment lines in Spain, including healthcare resource use (HRU) and associated costs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of real-life data from epilepsy patients prescribed antiseizure medication (ASM) between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were grouped according to their line of treatment (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th +) during the recruitment period. Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities and concomitant medications were analyzed during the baseline period (6 months before starting treatment line); antiepileptic treatments, concomitant medications, HRU and associated costs were analyzed during follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 5006 patients. Treatment duration decreased as treatment lines progressed (mean ± SD progression time: 523.2 ± 279.1 days from 1st to 2nd line, 351.6 ± 194.4 days from 2nd to 3rd line; 272.7 ± 139.3 days from 3rd to 4th + line). Significant HRU differences were found with subsequent treatment lines, including an increase in hospital admissions and patients on sick leave. Mean (95% CI) adjusted total costs per patient were €2974/year (2773-3175) in the 1st line and €5735/year (5043-6428) in the 4th + line. There was an increase in adjusted direct and total costs with subsequent treatment lines; the mean difference in total costs between cohorts was €2761 (p < 0.001). The highest direct costs were associated with epilepsy medication, days at the hospital and specialist visits.

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed a progressive increase in the use of resources and associated costs across subsequent epilepsy treatment lines.

Drug-resistant epilepsy: Definition, pathophysiology, and management

There are currently >51 million people with epilepsy (PWE) in the world and every year >4.9 million people develop new-onset epilepsy. The cornerstone of treatment in PWE is drug therapy with antiseizure medications (ASMs). However, about one-third of PWE do not achieve seizure control and do not respond well to drug therapy despite the use of appropriate ASMs [drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE)]. The aims of the current narrative review are to discuss the definition of DRE, explain the biological underpinnings and clinical biomarkers of this condition, and finally to suggest practical management strategies to tackle this issue appropriately, in a concise manner.

A nationwide study of initiation of antidepressant pharmacotherapy and the risk of seizures

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to examine whether antidepressant initiation increases the risk of hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient visits for seizures. Research has provided conflicting evidence as to whether antidepressant initiation causes seizures. Because epilepsy and depression are comorbid, this remains an important question, particularly in the care of those already at-risk for seizures.

METHODS

We used Swedish-register data, including 658,766 antidepressant initiators and 1:1 age-, region-, and sex-matched non-initiators, ages 12-65. We used filled prescriptions to identify any antidepressant and serotonergic antidepressant and inpatient hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient (to avoid coding routine epilepsy maintenance as a seizure) visits to identify seizures, respectively. We first compared seizure visit incidence between antidepressant-initiators and matched non-users in the year following initiation from 2006 to 2013. To examine seizure risk over months pre- and post-initiation, within-individual analyses compared risk during the month one year prior to initiation with all subsequent months. We examined associations for any antidepressant and serotonergic antidepressants, as well as for any initiator and initiators with a history of seizures.

RESULTS

Our matched-cohort results showed higher incidence of seizure visits among antidepressant users compared with non-users (e.g., adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR]=3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.83-3.49). In within-individual analyses, the months after initiation were associated with higher incidence of seizure visits when compared with the month one year prior to initiation (e.g., one month after initiation IRR=1.96, 95%CI=1.64-2.34), but in individuals with a seizure history we observed weaker or no associations in the months after initiation (e.g., two months after initiation IRR=1.12, 95%CI=0.87-1.45). Notably, irrespective of potential seizure history, the months preceding initiation were associated with the greatest risk (e.g., one month before initiation IRR=2.86, 95% CI=2.42-3.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there may be an elevated risk of seizures during antidepressant treatment, though the period of highest risk was before the initiation of antidepressants. Risk for seizure visits was lower among individuals with a history of prior seizures, which may be reassuring for the clinical care of these patients or indicate lack of treatment seeking following seizures. This study highlights the need to consider seizure risk across time; the failure to account for these dynamics may help account for discrepant findings in previous studies.

Antidepressant Drugs for Seizures and Epilepsy: Where do we Stand?

People with epilepsy (PWE) are more likely to develop depression and both these complex chronic diseases greatly affect health-related quality of life (QOL). This comorbidity contributes to the deterioration of the QOL further than increasing the severity of epilepsy worsening prognosis. Strong scientific evidence suggests the presence of shared pathogenic mechanisms. The correct identification and management of these factors are crucial in order to improve patients' QOL. This review article discusses recent original research on the most common pathogenic mechanisms of depression in PWE and highlights the effects of antidepressant drugs (ADs) against seizures in PWE and animal models of seizures and epilepsy. Newer ADs, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRRI) or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), particularly sertraline, citalopram, mirtazapine, reboxetine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, duloxetine may lead to improvements in epilepsy severity whereas the use of older tricyclic antidepressant (TCAs) can increase the occurrence of seizures. Most of the data demonstrate the acute effects of ADs in animal models of epilepsy while there is a limited number of studies about the chronic antidepressant effects in epilepsy and epileptogenesis or on clinical efficacy. Much longer treatments are needed in order to validate the effectiveness of these new alternatives in the treatment and the development of epilepsy, while further clinical studies with appropriate protocols are warranted in order to understand the real potential contribution of these drugs in the management of PWE (besides their effects on mood).

A complex systems view on the current hypotheses of epilepsy pharmacoresistance

Drug-resistant epilepsy remains to this day as a highly prevalent condition affecting around one-third of patients with epilepsy, despite all the research and the development of several new antiseizure medications (ASMs) over the last decades. Epilepsies are multifactorial complex diseases, commonly associated with psychiatric, neurological, and somatic comorbidities. Thus, to solve the puzzling problem of pharmacoresistance, the diagnosis and modeling of epilepsy and comorbidities need to change toward a complex system approach. In this review, we have summarized the sequence of events for the definition of epilepsies and comorbidities, the search for mechanisms, and the major hypotheses of pharmacoresistance, drawing attention to some of the many converging aspects between the proposed mechanisms, their supporting evidence, and comorbidities-related alterations. The use of systems biology applied to epileptology may lead to the discovery of new targets and the development of new ASMs, as may advance our understanding of the epilepsies and their comorbidities, providing much deeper insight on multidrug pharmacoresistance.

Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Several studies investigated the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving poststroke recovery; thus, we have decided to conduct this systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs in poststroke recovery.

Methods and Results

In this meta‐analysis we searched the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The studies were included if they were placebo‐controlled trials in design and reported SSRIs’ effects on poststroke depression, anxiety, disability, dependence, motor abilities, and cognitive functions. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool for randomized trials. The search yielded 44 articles that included 16 164 patients, and about half of the participants were treated with SSRIs. Our results showed that SSRIs had a significant effect on preventing depression (weighted mean difference [WMD], −7.05 [95% CI, −11.78 to −2.31]), treating depression according to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score (WMD, −1.45 [95% CI, −2.77 to −0.14]), anxiety (relative risk, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09–0.61]), dependence (WMD, 8.86 [95% CI, 1.23–16.48]), motor abilities according to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (WMD, −0.79 [95% CI, −1.42 to −0.15]), and cognitive functions (WMD, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.12–1.89]). On the other hand, no significant effect of SSRIs on disability was observed. Additionally, we found that treating with SSRIs increased the risk of seizures (relative risk, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.13–1.83]), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms or bleeding between SSRIs and a placebo.

Conclusions

Our study showed that SSRIs are effective in preventing and treating depression, and improving anxiety, motor function, cognitive function, and dependence in patients after stroke. These benefits were only reproducible with the citalopram subanalysis but not fluoxetine. Further well‐conducted placebo‐controlled trials are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of citalopram among patients after stroke.

Registration

URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021285766.

Response to antidepressants among patients with unipolar depression with and without comorbid epilepsy-a nation-wide population-based longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

In a nation-wide population-based longitudinal register linkage study to investigate long-term response to antidepressants in patients with depression with and without comorbid epilepsy.

METHODS

We used Danish nation-wide population-based longitudinal register linkage to identify 1487 patients with depression and comorbid epilepsy and 71,163 patients with depression without comorbid epilepsy during a study period from 1995 to 2017. Response was defined as continuous monotherapy with an antidepressant drug without switch to or add-on of another antidepressant drug, an antipsychotic drug or lithium or hospitalization during an up to ten-year follow-up period. We calculated standardized absolute risks and differences thereof with respect to age, gender, socioeconomic status and comorbidity with other physical disorders than epilepsy.

RESULTS

In patients with depression, response to antidepressants was decreased with versus without comorbid epilepsy during the ten-year follow-up period. One year after start of antidepressant treatment the proportion of responders was 12% (CI: 10%-14%) lower in patients with versus without comorbid epilepsy in the standardized population. Response to antidepressants were specifically decreased among younger and unemployed patients with depression and comorbid epilepsy.

LIMITATIONS

We did not include sub-analyses according to subtypes of epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to antidepressants was decreased in patients with comorbid epilepsy versus without comorbid epilepsy at all time points during a ten-year follow-up period. The study highlights the need for closely clinical monitoring and psychological support for patients with depression and comorbid epilepsy and emphasize the need for further long-term studies of effect of interventions.

Fenfluramine modulates the anti-amnesic effects induced by sigma-1 receptor agonists and neuro(active)steroids in vivo

Fenfluramine (N-ethyl-α-methl-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenethylamine) is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) particularly effective in patients with Dravet syndrome, a severe treatment-resistant epileptic encephalopathy. Fenfluramine acts not only as neuronal serotonin (5-HT) releaser but also as a positive modulator of the sigma-1 receptor (S1R). We here examined the modulatory activity of Fenfluramine on the S1R-mediated anti-amnesic response in mice using combination analyses. Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine, racemate and isomers, were combined with either the S1R agonist (PRE-084) or the S1R-acting neuro(active)steroids, pregnenolone sulfate (PREGS), Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), or progesterone. We report that Fenfluramine racemate or (+)-Fenfluramine, in the 0.1-1 mg/kg dose range, attenuated the dizocilpine-induced learning deficits in spontaneous alternation and passive avoidance, and showed low-dose synergies in combination with PRE-084. These effects were blocked by the S1R antagonist NE-100. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate or PREGS attenuated dizocilpine-induced learning deficits in the 5-20 mg/kg dose range. Co-treatments at low dose between steroids and Fenfluramine or (+)-Fenfluramine were synergistic. Progesterone blocked Fenfluramine effect. Finally, Fenfluramine and (+)-Fenfluramine effects were prevented by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 or 5-HT2A antagonist RS-127445, but not by the 5-HT1B/1D antagonist GR 127935 or the 5-HT2C antagonist SB 242084, confirming a 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor involvement in the drug effect on memory. We therefore confirmed the positive modulation of Fenfluramine racemate or dextroisomer on S1R and showed that, in physiological conditions, the drug potentiated the low dose effects of neuro(active)steroids, endogenous S1R modulators. The latter are potent modulators of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in the brain, and their levels must be considered in the antiepileptic action of Fenfluramine.

Comorbidity of Epilepsy and Depression: Associated Pathophysiology and Management

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent unprovoked seizures. Depression may arise as a result of other mental or physical problems or as a side effect of the drugs used to treat such illnesses, or it could be caused by epilepsy-related structural abnormalities. However, physicians are hesitant to prescribe antidepressants to patients with epilepsy due to concerns about decreasing seizure thresholds and the harmful drug interactions between antidepressants and antiepileptic medicines. As a result, the question about the optimal care of epileptic patients who suffer from depression remains unanswered. Despite the complicated link between epilepsy and depression, the co-administration of antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is safe and beneficial when appropriately managed. A focused evaluation for depression (regardless of social, economic, or personal circumstances) might identify people who benefit from medical care and therapeutic assistance. Vagus nerve stimulation and psychological therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, individual or group psychotherapy, patient support groups, family therapy, and counseling are nonpharmacological therapeutic alternatives. In terms of treatment strategy, it is critical to optimize seizure control and limit antiepileptic medications' adverse effects. Psychotherapy for depression in epilepsy is underused, even though it has been shown to be helpful in well-controlled studies. This review article has discussed some parts of the most common pathophysiologies of depression in patients with epilepsy, highlighted the efficacy of psychotherapy and antidepressant drugs, and explored the optimal care of patients with epilepsy who suffer from depression.

Using integrated meta-omics to appreciate the role of the gut microbiota in epilepsy

The way the human microbiota may modulate neurological pathologies is a fascinating matter of research. Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, which has been largely investigated in correlation with microbiota health and function. However, the mechanisms that regulate this apparent connection are scarcely defined, and extensive effort has been conducted to understand the role of microbiota in preventing and reducing epileptic seizures. Intestinal bacteria seem to modulate the seizure frequency mainly by releasing neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators. In order to elucidate the complex microbial contribution to epilepsy pathophysiology, integrated meta-omics could be pivotal. In fact, the combination of two or more meta-omics approaches allows a multifactorial study of microbial activity within the frame of disease or drug treatments. In this review, we provide information depicting and supporting the use of multi-omics to study the microbiota-epilepsy connection. We described different meta-omics analyses (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics and metabolomics), focusing on current technical challenges in stool collection procedures, sample extraction methods and data processing. We further discussed the current advantages and limitations of using the integrative approach of multi-omics in epilepsy investigations.

Positive anxiety or depression screen despite ongoing antidepressant prescription in people with epilepsy: A large cross-sectional analysis

Purpose

While antidepressants are recommended to manage anxiety or depression in epilepsy, limited effectiveness data exist in real-world epilepsy samples, and prior work indicated frequent positive screens despite antidepressant prescription. In response, this study evaluates factors associated with positive anxiety or depression screen during ongoing antidepressant prescription.

Methods

Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were collected among consecutive adult epilepsy clinic patients completing validated anxiety and depression instruments. The sample was divided by presence vs absence of existing antidepressant prescription at time of screening. Among those on an antidepressant, multivariable logistic regression was performed on pre-selected characteristics to evaluate for association with positive anxiety and/or depression screen. Pre-selected characteristics included: antidepressant dose, antidepressant prescriber specialty, antiseizure medications (number, potential psychotropic effects), seizure frequency, employment, visit no-shows, and medical insurance.

Results

Of 563 people with epilepsy, 152 had evidence of antidepressant prescription at time of screening and 73/152(48%) had positive anxiety and/or depression screen. Multivariable modeling demonstrated low antidepressant dose and no-show visit(s) were associated with positive screens (adjusted OR 2.29, CI 1.00-5.48 and 3.11, 1.26-8.22 respectively).

Conclusion

Low antidepressant dose and factors potentially associated with adherence (visit no-shows) may contribute to persistent anxiety and/or depression among epilepsy patients on an antidepressant.

Bidirectional Relations Among Depression, Migraine, and Epilepsy: Do They Have an Impact on Their Response to Treatment?

The evaluation and treatment of patients with epilepsy is not limited to the type of epilepsy, but it must incorporate the common comorbid neurologic, psychiatric, and medical disorders, as the latter can bare an impact on the course and response to treatment of the seizure disorder and vice versa. In this article we review the bidirectional relations among epilepsy and two of its most common comorbidities, mood disorders and migraine and examine the implications of these relations on the selection of therapies of these three disorders and their response to treatment. We also review the most salient common pathogenic mechanisms that may explain such relations.

An Emerging Role for Sigma-1 Receptors in the Treatment of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are complex conditions characterized primarily by seizures associated with neurodevelopmental and motor deficits. Recent evidence supports sigma-1 receptor modulation in both neuroprotection and antiseizure activity, suggesting that sigma-1 receptors may play a role in the pathogenesis of DEEs, and that targeting this receptor has the potential to positively impact both seizures and non-seizure outcomes in these disorders. Recent studies have demonstrated that the antiseizure medication fenfluramine, a serotonin-releasing drug that also acts as a positive modulator of sigma-1 receptors, reduces seizures and improves everyday executive functions (behavior, emotions, cognition) in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Here, we review the evidence for sigma-1 activity in reducing seizure frequency and promoting neuroprotection in the context of DEE pathophysiology and clinical presentation, using fenfluramine as a case example. Challenges and opportunities for future research include developing appropriate models for evaluating sigma-1 receptors in these syndromic epileptic conditions with multisystem involvement and complex clinical presentation.

Awakening from post anoxic coma with burst suppression with identical bursts

Background

Electroencephalography (EEG) is commonly used after cardiac arrest. Burst suppression with identical bursts (BSIB) has been reported as a perfectly specific predictor of poor outcome but published case series are small. We describe two patients with BSIB who awakened from coma after cardiac arrest.

Methods

We identified two out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with coma and BSIB. We determined the etiology of arrest, presenting neurological examination, potential confounders to neurological assessment, neurodiagnostics and time to awakening. We reviewed and interpreted EEGs using 2021 American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guidelines. We quantified identicality of bursts by calculating pairwise correlation coefficients between the first 500 ms of each aligned burst.

Results

In case one we present a 62-year-old man with OHCA secondary to septic shock. EEG showed burst suppression pattern, with bursts consisted of high amplitude generalized spike waves in lock-step with myoclonus (inter-burst correlation = 0.86). He followed commands 3 days after arrest, when repeat EEG showed a continuous, variable and reactive background without epileptiform activity. Case two was a 49-year-old woman with OHCA secondary to polysubstance overdose. Initial EEG revealed burst suppression with high amplitude generalized polyspike-wave bursts with associated myoclonus. She followed commands on post-arrest day 4, when repeat EEG showed a continuous, variable and reactive background with frequent runs of bifrontal predominant sharply contoured rhythmic delta activity.

Conclusion

These cases highlight the perils of prognosticating with a single modality in comatose cardiac arrest patients.

Do Psychotropic Drugs Cause Epileptic Seizures? A Review of the Available Evidence

Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy are common. A bidirectional relationship has been well described where not only patients with epilepsy have a higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities but also patients with primary psychiatric disorders are at an increased risk of developing seizures. The aim of this review is to highlight the complex relationship between epilepsy and common psychiatric disorders and to answer the question whether psychotropic medications are proconvulsant by reviewing the preclinical and clinical literature. The evidence shows that the majority of psychotropic medications are not proconvulsant when used in therapeutic doses with the exception of a subset of medications, mainly bupropion IR and certain antipsychotic drugs such as clozapine. An effective treatment of psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy must consider not only the potential therapeutic effect of the drug, but also its potential iatrogenic effects on the seizure disorder.

Serotonin and dopamine receptors profile on peripheral immune cells from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

The role of inflammation and immune cells has been demonstrated in neurological diseases, including epilepsy. Leukocytes, as well as inflammatory mediators, contribute to abnormal processes that lead to a reduction in seizure threshold and synaptic reorganization. In this sense, identifying different phenotypes of circulating immune cells is essential to understanding the role of these cells in epilepsy. Immune cells can express a variety of surface markers, including neurotransmitter receptors, such as serotonin and dopamine. Alteration in these receptors expression patterns may affect the level of inflammatory mediators and the pathophysiology of epilepsy. Therefore, in the current study, we evaluated the expression of dopamine and serotonin receptors on white blood cells from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-HS). Blood samples from 17 patients with TLE-HS and 21 controls were collected. PBMC were isolated and stained ex vivo for flow cytometry. We evaluated the expression of serotonin (5-HT_1A, 5-HT_1B, 5-HT₂, 5-HT_2B, 5-HT_2C, 5-HT₃, 5-HT₄), and dopamine receptors (D₁, D₂, D₃, D₄, and D₅) on the cell surface of lymphocytes and innate immune cells (monocytes and granulocytes). Our results demonstrated that innate cells and lymphocytes from patients with TLE-HS showed high mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) for 5-HT_1A, 5-HT_1B, 5-HT_2A, and 5-HT₄ compared to controls. No difference was observed for 5-HT_2B. For dopamine receptors, the expression of D₁, D₂, D_4, and D₅ receptors was higher on innate cells from patients with TLE-HS when compared to controls for the MFI. Regarding lymphocytes population, D₂ expression was increased in patients with TLE-HS. In conclusion, there are alterations in the expression of serotonin and dopamine receptors on immune blood cells of patients with TLE-HS. Although the biological significance of these findings still needs to be further investigated, these changes may contribute to the understanding of TLE-HS pathophysiology.

Epilepsy Associated Depression: An Update on Current Scenario, Suggested Mechanisms, and Opportunities

Depression is one of the most frequent psychiatric comorbidities associated with epilepsy having a major impact on the patient's quality of life. Several screening tools are available to identify and follow up psychiatric disorders in epilepsy. Out of various psychiatric disorders, people with epilepsy (PWE) are at greater risk of developing depression. This bidirectional relationship further hinders pharmacotherapy of comorbid depression in PWE as some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) worsen associated depression and coadministration of existing antidepressants (ADs) to alleviate comorbid depression has been reported to worsen seizures. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are first choice of ADs and are considered safe in PWE, but there are no high-quality evidences. Similar to observations in people with depression, PWE also showed pharmacoresistant to available SSRI/SNRIs, which further complicates the disease prognosis. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials are necessary to report efficacy and safety of available ADs in PWE. We should also move beyond ADs, and therefore, we reviewed common pathological mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, dysregulated hypothalamus pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, altered neurogenesis, and altered tryptophan metabolism responsible for coexistent relationship of epilepsy and depression. Based on these common pertinent pathways involved in the genesis of epilepsy and depression, we suggested novel targets and therapeutic approaches for safe management of comorbid depression in epilepsy.

Risk of seizures with antidepressants: what is the evidence?

Topics for DTB review articles are selected by DTB's editorial board to provide concise overviews of medicines and other treatments to help patients get the best care. Articles include a summary of key points and a brief overview for patients. Articles may also have a series of multiple choice CME questions.

Depression and Anxiety in the Epilepsies: from Bench to Bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Depression and anxiety substantially contribute to interictal disability in patients with epilepsy (PWE). This review summarizes current studies that shed light on mechanisms of comorbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mounting epidemiological data implicate shared risk factors for anxiety/depression and seizure propensity, but these remain largely elusive and probably vary by epilepsy type. Within PWE, these symptoms appear to be associated with unique genetic, neuropathological, and connectivity profiles. Temporal lobe epilepsy has received enormous emphasis particularly in preclinical studies of comorbidity, where candidate neurobiological mechanisms underlying bidirectionality have been tested without psychopharmacological confounds. Depression and anxiety in epilepsy reflect dysfunction within broadly distributed limbic networks that may be the cause or consequence of epileptogenesis. In refractory epilepsy, seizures and/or certain anticonvulsants may distort central emotional homeostatic mechanisms that perpetually raise seizure risk. Developing future safe and effective combined anticonvulsant-antidepressant treatments will require a detailed understanding of anatomical and molecular nodes that pleiotropically enhance seizure risk and negatively alter emotionality.

Risk factors for depression in patients with epilepsy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Depression is common and associated with reduced quality of life (QoL) in people with epilepsy (PWE). Although multiple studies have investigated the relevant predictors, the results have been inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the risk factors that might increase the possibility of depression in this population.

METHODS

Medline, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were comprehensively searched for cross-sectional studies on the occurrence of depression in PWE. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Heterogeneity between the study results and the probability of publication bias were also assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cross-sectional studies with sample sizes ranging from 36 to 1763 were included in this meta-analysis. The significant factors associated with an increased risk of depression were older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04; p = 0.019), female gender (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.30-1.93; p < 0.001), low education level (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.86-4.00; p < 0.001), not being employed (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.38; p = 0.019), poor antiepileptic drug (AED) adherence (OR: 2.84, 95% CI: 1.94-4.16; p < 0.001), polytherapy (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.48-3.41; p < 0.001), stigma (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.71-2.88; p < 0.001), and anxiety (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.66-2.94; p < 0.001). A shorter epilepsy duration was significantly associated with a lower risk of depression (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-0.99; p < 0.001), whereas marital status (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.90-1.20; p = 0.684), economic level (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.95-1.08; p = 0.684), age at seizure onset (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.29; p = 0.912), and seizure control (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.65-1.63; p = 0.900) did not increase the risk of depression.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis defined several factors related to an increased risk of depression in PWE and can contribute to better prevention and screening strategies for depression in this group. The mechanisms behind this comorbidity remain to be further investigated to determine individually appropriate and targeted interventions.

Raloxifene potentiates the effect of fluoxetine against maximal electroshock induced seizures in mice

The evidence to guide clinicians regarding rationale polytherapy with current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is lacking, and current practice recommendations are largely empirical.  The excessive drug loading with combinatorial therapies of existing AEDs are associated with escalated neurotoxicity, and that emergence of pharmacoresistant seizures couldn't be averted. In pursuit of judicious selection of novel AEDs in combinatorial therapies with mechanism based evidences, standardized dose of raloxifene, fluoxetine, bromocriptine and their low dose combinations, were experimentally tested for their impact on maximal electroshock (MES) induced tonic hind limb extension (THLE) in mice. Hippocampal neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels, oxidative stress and histopathological studies were undertaken. The results suggest the potentiating effect of 4 mg/kg raloxifene on 14 mg/kg fluoxetine against MES induced THLE, as otherwise monotherapy with 4 mg/kg raloxifene was unable to produce an effect. The results also depicted better efficacy than carbamazepine (20 mg/kg), standard AED. Most profoundly, MES-induced significant (P < 0.001) reduction in hippocampal NPY levels, that were escalated insignificantly with the duo-drug combination, suggesting some other mechanism in mitigation of electroshock induced seizures. These results were later corroborated with assays to assess oxidative stress and neuronal damage. In conclusion, the results demonstrated the propitious therapeutic benefit of duo-drug low dose combination of drugs; raloxifene and fluoxetine, with diverse mode of actions fetching greater effectiveness in the management of generalized tonic clonic seizures (GTCS).

Epilepsy Benchmarks Area I: Understanding the Causes of the Epilepsies and Epilepsy-Related Neurologic, Psychiatric, and Somatic Conditions

The 2014 NINDS Benchmarks for Epilepsy Research included area I: Understand the causes of the epilepsies and epilepsy-related neurologic, psychiatric, and somatic conditions. In preparation for the 2020 Curing Epilepsies Conference, where the Benchmarks will be revised, this review will cover scientific progress toward that Benchmark, with emphasize on studies since 2016.

Normalization of EEG in depression after antidepressant treatment with sertraline? A preliminary report

BACKGROUND

MDD patients with abnormal EEG patterns seem more likely to be non-responsive to the antidepressants escitalopram and venlafaxine, but not sertraline, than patients without EEG abnormalities. This finding suggests that patients with both MDD and abnormal EEGs may differentially respond to antidepressant treatment. In the current study, we investigated whether depressed patients with an abnormal EEG show a normalization of the EEG related to antidepressant treatment and response and whether such effect is drug specific, and whether having had early life stress (ELS) increases the chance of abnormal activity.

METHODS

Baseline and week 8 EEGs and depression symptoms were extracted from a large multicenter study (iSPOT-D, n = 1008) where depressed patients were randomized to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR treatment. We calculated Odds Ratios of EEG normalization and depression response in patients with an abnormal EEG at baseline, comparing sertraline versus other antidepressants.

RESULTS

Fifty seven patients with abnormal EEGs were included. EEGs did not normalize significantly more with sertraline compared to other antidepressants (OR = 1.9, p = .280). However, patients with a normalized EEG taking sertraline were 5.2 times more likely to respond than subjects taking other antidepressants (p = .019). ELS was not significantly related to abnormal activity.

LIMITATIONS

Neurophysiological recordings were limited in time (two times 2-minute EEGs) and statistical power (n = 57 abnormal EEGs).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates in patients with normalized EEG taking sertraline were significantly larger than in subjects treated with escitalopram/venlafaxine. This adds to personalized medicine and suggests a possible drug repurposing for sertraline.

Psychiatric comorbidities go unrecognized in patients with epilepsy: "You see what you know"

Patients with epilepsy (PWE) have a significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbid disorders involving depression, anxiety, psychotic, and attention-deficit disorders compared with the general population or patients with other chronic medical conditions. Currently, there is no systematic approach in the evaluation and management of psychiatric comorbidities in these patients. In addition, neurologists are not trained to recognize these disorders, and consequently, they remain undertreated. Despite the high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery, most epilepsy centers in North America do not include a psychiatric evaluation as part of the presurgical work-up. Despite the intimate relationship between psychiatric comorbidities and epilepsy, collaboration between epileptologists and psychiatrists is sparse at best and nonexistent at worse. The purpose of this paper was to highlight and try to understand the causes behind the persistent lack in communication between neurologists and psychiatrists, the gap in the training of neurologists on psychiatric aspects of neurologic disorders and vice versa and to propose new initiatives to fix the problem. This article is part of the Special Issue "Obstacles of Treatment of Psychiatric Comorbidities in Epilepsy".

Adult neurogenesis in the mouse dentate gyrus protects the hippocampus from neuronal injury following severe seizures

Previous studies suggest that reducing the numbers of adult-born neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the mouse increases susceptibility to severe continuous seizures (status epilepticus; SE) evoked by systemic injection of the convulsant kainic acid (KA). However, it was not clear if the results would be the same for other ways to induce seizures, or if SE-induced damage would be affected. Therefore, we used pilocarpine, which induces seizures by a different mechanism than KA. Also, we quantified hippocampal damage after SE. In addition, we used both loss-of-function and gain-of-function methods in adult mice. We hypothesized that after loss-of-function, mice would be more susceptible to pilocarpine-induced SE and SE-associated hippocampal damage, and after gain-of-function, mice would be more protected from SE and hippocampal damage after SE. For loss-of-function, adult neurogenesis was suppressed by pharmacogenetic deletion of dividing radial glial precursors. For gain-of-function, adult neurogenesis was increased by conditional deletion of pro-apoptotic gene Bax in Nestin-expressing progenitors. Fluoro-Jade C (FJ-C) was used to quantify neuronal injury and video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) was used to quantify SE. Pilocarpine-induced SE was longer in mice with reduced adult neurogenesis, SE had more power and neuronal damage was greater. Conversely, mice with increased adult-born neurons had shorter SE, SE had less power, and there was less neuronal damage. The results suggest that adult-born neurons exert protective effects against SE and SE-induced neuronal injury.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury - A population based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common and associated with a marked increased risk of developing epilepsy. Animal studies indicate that treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may increase the risk of epilepsy after TBI. The aim of this study was to investigate whether use of SSRIs modifies the risk of epilepsy after TBI.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of 205,715 persons, who suffered a TBI in Denmark from 1996 to 2013. For each person with TBI, we matched 10 reference persons (N = 2,057,150) who were alive on the day of TBI and who had the same age and gender but had no history of TBI. We used a stratified Cox regression to calculate the relative risk of epilepsy after TBI for persons exposed to TBI, SSRI or both after adjustment for income, civil status, medical and neurological comorbidities, severe mental disease, and substance abuse.

RESULTS

The risk of epilepsy was 5.61 times higher for persons who used SSRI at time of TBI (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR): 5.61 (95% CI: 4.88; 6.45)), 3.23 times higher for persons who had a TBI but did not use SSRI at time of TBI (aHR: 3.23 (95% CI: 3.12;3.35)), and 1.31 times higher for persons who used SSRI but had no TBI (aHR: 1.31 (95% CI: 1.18; 1.45)) compared to persons unexposed to both TBI and SSRI.

CONCLUSIONS

This large population based cohort study showed that people using SSRI at the time of a TBI had higher risk of developing epilepsy compared to people not using SSRI at the time of TBI. The results are in line with those of animal studies and calls for further studies to evaluate whether the association is due to SSRIs or to the underlying disease (e.g. depression or anxiety).

BDNF and COMT, but not APOE, alleles are associated with psychiatric symptoms in refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether three common genetic polymorphisms [apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 (rs42938 and rs7412), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Met (rs6265), and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val (rs4680)] are associated with increased psychiatric symptomatology in individuals with pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

METHODS

One hundred forty-eight adults (M_age = 38 years; 53% female) with refractory epilepsy completed self-report measures of mood, anxiety, and/or personality/psychopathology. Mann-Whitney U, t-tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine if APOE4, BDNF Val66Met, or COMT Val158Met are associated with increased psychiatric symptomatology in people with epilepsy.

RESULTS

As a group, BDNF Met carriers reported greater symptoms of depression on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) than those without a Met allele (p = 0.004); COMT Val carriers reported greater symptoms on the PAI Schizophrenia (p = 0.007), Antisocial Features (p = 0.04), and Alcohol Problems (p = 0.03) scales than noncarriers. On the individual level, a significantly greater proportion of BDNF Met carriers demonstrated elevated PAI Depression scores compared to those without a Met allele (p = 0.046). There was also a larger proportion of COMT Val carriers with elevated PAI Anxiety scores as compared to those without a Val allele (p = 0.036).

SIGNIFICANCE

This retrospective cross-sectional study provides preliminary evidence for a genetic basis of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and suggests that BDNF and COMT may play an important role in the pathophysiology of mental health problems in this vulnerable population.

Antiepileptic and psychiatric medication in a nationwide cohort of patients with glioma WHO grade II-IV

INTRODUCTION

Glioma is the most common intracranial primary brain tumor. Patients with glioma often suffer from epilepsy, anxiety and depression. Aims of this study were to identify risk factors for drug-treated anxiety and depression, and to determine the use of psychiatric medication in a national glioma cohort.

METHODS

Data from the Cancer Registry of Norway on all persons diagnosed with glioma WHO grade II-IV 2004-2010 were linked with data from the Norwegian Prescription Database. Cox regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for drug-treated anxiety and depression. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated for psychiatric medication dispensed to glioma patients and compared to the general population.

RESULTS

The glioma cohort consisted of 1056 males and 772 females. Of the 1828 patients, 565 had glioma grade II-III, and 1263 had grade IV. The patients with glioma grade II-III who were treated with levetiracetam had an increased risk for drug-treated anxiety compared to patients without levetiracetam; hazard ratio 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.7-4.9). Female gender increased the risk for drug-treated anxiety compared to males in patients with glioma grade IV; hazard ratio 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.0). Antidepressants were less frequently dispensed to patients with glioma grade II-III and epilepsy than to the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with glioma grade II-III on levetiracetam had an increased risk for drug-treated anxiety. The subgroup of patients with glioma grade II-III and epilepsy received less antidepressants than the general population.

Bidirectional relations among common psychiatric and neurologic comorbidities and epilepsy: Do they have an impact on the course of the seizure disorder?

The treatment of epilepsy is not limited to the achievement of a seizure‐free state. It must also incorporate the management of common psychiatric and neurologic comorbidities, affecting on average between 30 and 50% of patients with epilepsy, which have a significant impact on their lives at various levels, including quality of life and the prognosis of the seizure disorder. Mood and anxiety disorders are the most frequent psychiatric comorbidities, whereas stroke and migraine are among the more common neurologic comorbidities, migraine among the younger patients and stroke among the older patients. Not only do these psychiatric and neurologic comorbidities each have a bidirectional relation with epilepsy, but primary mood disorders have a bidirectional relation with these 2 neurologic disorders. Furthermore, depression and migraine have been each associated with a more severe epilepsy course, whereas depression has been associated with a more severe course of stroke and migraines. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical implications of the complex relations among epilepsy and these 3 comorbid disorders, and to identify any clinical and/or experimental evidence that may suggest that having more than one of these comorbid disorders may increase the risk of and course of epilepsy.

Antidepressants in epilepsy

People with epilepsy (PWE) frequently suffer from comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Depression is one of the major psychiatric comorbidities having a negative impact on the quality of life in people with epilepsy. A review of the literature indicates that the majority of antidepressant-related seizures have been associated with either ultra-high doses or overdosing and, generally, the risk of antidepressant-associated seizures is low. Correspondingly, there is some evidence indicating that antidepressants of most widely used groups may additionally lower the risk of triggering seizures. Four antidepressants are not recommended for patients with epilepsy, i.e.: amoxapine, bupropion, clomipramine and maprotiline. Clinicians applying first line of depression treatment in patients with epilepsy should consider use of SSRIs or SNRIs, particularly sertraline, citalopram, mirtazapine, reboxetine, paroxetine, fluoxetine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, duloxetine. Implementation of anticonvulsive drugs in depressed patients should include valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin. The paper reviews the evidence for the clinical use of antidepressants in PWE.

Assessing depression severity with a self-rated vs. rater-administered instrument in patients with epilepsy

RATIONALE

Up to 30-50% of individuals with epilepsy have depressive symptoms, which often complicate seizure management and reduce overall quality of life. To identify and manage depressive symptoms appropriately, clinicians need standardized instruments that can accurately identify and monitor those with clinically significant depression. The self-reported 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has been used relatively widely to screen and monitor depression in epilepsy. The rater-administered Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a rater-administered instrument widely used in depression treatment trials but less widely applied in epilepsy. This secondary analysis from 2 epilepsy self-management clinical trials compared depression severity ratings using the PHQ-9 and the MADRS instruments.

METHODS

Data for this analysis were derived from pooled baseline and longitudinal data from 2 prospective epilepsy self-management randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Both RCTs assessed depression with the PHQ-9 and the MADRS. For this analysis, total depression severity scores and case classification of individuals with no/minimal, mild, moderate/moderately severe, and severe depression were assessed using both PHQ-9 and MADRS.

RESULTS

The sample contained 164 individuals with epilepsy. Demographic and clinical variables between the 2 studies were generally similar. There were 107 women (64.8%), 106 African-Americans (64.2%), and 51 Whites (30.9%). Individuals had epilepsy for an average of 22.1 (SD: 15.5). Mean past 30-day seizure frequency at baseline was 3.1 (SD: 11.6). Baseline mean PHQ-9 was 10.7 (SD: 6.80) with depression severity of 32 (19.6%) not or minimally depressed, 47 (28.8%) mildly depressed, 37 (22.7%) moderately depressed, 27 (16.6%) moderately severely depressed, and 20 (12.3%) severely depressed. Baseline mean MADRS severity was 18.5 (SD: 11.3) with 30 (18.8%) not or minimally depressed, 27 (16.9%) mildly depressed, 92 (56.1%) moderately depressed, and 11 (6.9%) severely depressed. The correlation between total PHQ-9 and total MADRS was 0.843 (p < .01) although case classification by depression severity varied somewhat between the two instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized measures to evaluate depression severity in people with epilepsy can help identify cases and monitor treatment. The PHQ-9 and MADRS both perform well in assessing depression in people with epilepsy although administration burden is less with PHQ-9 thus making it likely preferable for settings where time and epilepsy specialty resources are limited.

A review of treatment options for behavioural manifestations of clinical anxiety as a comorbidity in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy

Psychiatric comorbidities affect a large percentage of people with epilepsy and have a detrimental impact on their quality of life. Recently, behavioural comorbidities, with similar characteristics to human psychiatric diseases, have been identified in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy. In particular, behaviours motivated by the fear-anxiety emotional system have been found to be associated with the occurrence of idiopathic epilepsy in both dogs receiving anti-epileptic drugs, and drug-naïve dogs. There has been little research into the relationship between epilepsy and behavioural signs, and even less into potential treatment protocols. The following article will review available literature from human medicine to describe the current state of knowledge about the bi-directional relationship between anxiety and epilepsy, draw parallels from reported anxiogenic and anxiolytic properties of anti-epileptic drugs and attempt to provide pharmaceutical and behavioural guidance for veterinary patients with epilepsy and comorbid anxiety.

The prescribable drugs with efficacy in experimental epilepsies (PDE3) database for drug repurposing research in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have several shortcomings. For example, they fail to control seizures in 30% of patients. Hence, there is a need to identify new AEDs. Drug repurposing is the discovery of new indications for approved drugs. This drug "recycling" offers the potential of significant savings in the time and cost of drug development. Many drugs licensed for other indications exhibit antiepileptic efficacy in animal models. Our aim was to create a database of "prescribable" drugs, approved for other conditions, with published evidence of efficacy in animal models of epilepsy, and to collate data that would assist in choosing the most promising candidates for drug repurposing.

METHODS

The database was created by the following: (1) computational literature-mining using novel software that identifies Medline abstracts containing the name of a prescribable drug, a rodent model of epilepsy, and a phrase indicating seizure reduction; then (2) crowdsourced manual curation of the identified abstracts.

RESULTS

The final database includes 173 drugs and 500 abstracts. It is made freely available at www.liverpool.ac.uk/D3RE/PDE3. The database is reliable: 94% of the included drugs have corroborative evidence of efficacy in animal models (for example, evidence from multiple independent studies). The database includes many drugs that are appealing candidates for repurposing, as they are widely accepted by prescribers and patients-the database includes half of the 20 most commonly prescribed drugs in England-and they target many proteins involved in epilepsy but not targeted by current AEDs. It is important to note that the drugs are of potential relevance to human epilepsy-the database is highly enriched with drugs that target proteins of known causal human epilepsy genes (Fisher's exact test P-value < 3 × 10^-5 ). We present data to help prioritize the most promising candidates for repurposing from the database.

SIGNIFICANCE

The PDE3 database is an important new resource for drug repurposing research in epilepsy.

Can Neurochemical Changes of Mood Disorders Explain the Increase Risk of Epilepsy or its Worse Seizure Control?

The existence of a bidirectional relation between mood disorders and epilepsy has been suggested by six population-based studies. Furthermore, three studies have associated a higher risk of treatment-resistant epilepsy with a history of depression preceding the onset of epilepsy. Common pathogenic mechanisms operant in depression and epilepsy may provide a possible explanation of these observations. This article reviews some of the leading pathogenic mechanisms of depression with respect to potential proconvulsant properties that may provide explanations for these phenomena.