Seizures by the clock: Temporal patterns of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Melatonin supplementation for the treatment of infantile spasms: protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial

INTRODUCTION

Infantile spasms (IS) is a type of severe epileptic encephalopathy that occurs in infancy and early childhood. IS is characterised clinically by epileptic spasms, often accompanied by sleep disorder and abnormal circadian rhythm. The endogenous circadian rhythm disorder, in turn, can make spasms worse. Melatonin has also been found to have anticonvulsant and neuroprotective properties by adjusting the circadian rhythm. However, there are lack of relevant studies on controlling IS by using melatonin. This study aims to analyse the therapeutic effect of melatonin supplementation for the treatment of IS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a triple-blinded (trial participant, outcome assessor and the data analyst), prospective, randomised controlled trial to be conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China from November 2020. Patients (n=70) aged 3 months to 2 years with IS will be recruited in this study after receiving written consent from their parents or guardians. Patients will be randomly divided into two equal groups and treated with a combination of adrenocorticotropic hormone, magnesium sulfate and either melatonin or placebo. Clinical data from the patients in the two groups before and after the treatment will be collected and compared. The primary outcome will be assessed 2 weeks later by seizure diaries and reported as the average reduced rate of spasms frequency. Secondary outcomes include the response rate (the rate of spasms-free), electroencephalogram hypsarrhythmia assessment and the psychomotor development assessment (Denver Developmental Screening Test). Sleep quality and safety will also be assessed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol for this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (reference number S2020-337-01) and was reported according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement. Findings of this research will be disseminated through national and international meetings, conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2000036208.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and symptoms for psychogenic nonepileptic attacks versus epileptic seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEA) are events of altered behavior that resemble epileptic seizures (ES) but are not caused by abnormal electrical cortical activity. Understanding which clinical signs and symptoms are associated with PNEA may allow better triaging for video-electroencephalogram monitoring (VEM) and for a more accurate prediction when such testing is unavailable.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 29, 2019. We included original research that reported at least one clinical sign or symptom, included distinct groups of adult ES and PNEA with no overlap, and used VEM for the reference standard. Two authors independently assessed quality of the studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of studies were evaluated using a bivariate random effects model.

RESULTS

We identified 4028 articles, of which 33 were included. There was a female sex predominance in the PNEA population (n = 22). From our meta-analysis, pooled sensitivities (0.27-0.72) and specificities (0.51-0.89) for PNEA were modest for individual signs. History of sexual abuse had the highest pooled specificity (89%), while the most sensitive feature was female sex (72%). Individual studies (n = 4) reported high levels of accuracy for ictal eye closure (sensitivity 64-73.7% and specificity 76.9-100%) and post-traumatic stress disorder (no reported sensitivity or specificity). Assuming the pre-test probability for PNEA in a tertiary care epilepsy center is 14%, even the strongest meta-analyzed features only exert modest diagnostic value, increasing post-test probabilities to a maximum of 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reflects the limited certainty afforded by individual clinical features to distinguish between PNEA and ES. Specific demographic and comorbid features, even despite moderately high specificities, impart minimal impact on diagnostic decision making. This emphasizes the need for the development of multisource predictive tools to optimize diagnostic likelihood ratios.

Sleep Disturbances in Patients with Nonepileptic Seizures

OBJECTIVE

Up to 20% of patients treated for epileptic seizures experience psychogenic nonepileptic paroxysms (PNES). These patients present a significant burden for the health care systems because of poor treatment outcomes. The presented review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on sleep disturbances in patients with nonepileptic seizures.

METHODS

Articles were acquired via PubMed and Web of Science, and papers between January 1990 and March 2020 were extracted. Inclusion criteria were (1) published in a peer-reviewed journal: (2) studies in humans only; or (3) reviews on a related topic; (4) English language. The exclusion criteria were: (1) abstracts from conferences; (2) commentaries; (3) subjects younger than 18 years. From primary assessment, 122 articles were extracted; after obtaining full texts and secondary articles from reference lists, 45 papers were used in this review.

RESULTS

Limited data are available regarding sleep disorders in PNES patients, over the last 30 years only nine original research papers addressed sleep problems in patients with PNES with only six studies assessing objectively measured changes in sleep. Current literature supports the subjective perception of the sleep disturbances with mixed results in objective pathophysiological findings. Conflicting results regarding the REM phase can be found, and studies reported both shortening and prolonging of the REM phase with methodological limitations. Poor sleep quality and shortened duration have been consistently described in most of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Further research on a broader spectrum of patients with PNES is needed, primarily focusing on objective neurophysiological findings. Quality of life in patients suffering from PNES can be increased by good sleep habits and treatment of comorbid sleep disorders.