New anticonvulsant candidates prevent P-glycoprotein (P-gp) overexpression in a pharmacoresistant seizure model in mice

Mitigation of Acute Seizures and Neuropathology after Traumatic Brain Injury by Structure-Based Discovery-Identified Drugs

Our objective was to test the hypothesis that structure-based identified or designed compounds exhibiting neuroprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties in vitro will mitigate early seizures and neuropathology after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in vivo. The neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of 11 compounds identified by computer-assisted approximations were tested in vitro in neuronal microglial co-cultures. Among these, compound FBA exhibited the best neuroprotective (MAP-2, microtubule-associated-protein 2, a neuronal damage biomarker), antioxidative (nitrite production), and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro (all p < 0.01). Consequently, its neuroprotective and antiseizure effects were assessed in vivo in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to severe lateral fluid-percussion-induced TBI. Rats under continuous video-electroencephalogram monitoring received prophylactic treatment with an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of FBA (FBApro, 30 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH, 48% PEG in 0.9% saline, 3 mL/kg) at 2 and 24 h post-TBI. Rats that developed status epilepticus received 1-2 additional on-demand FBA doses (FBApro+, 100 mg/kg, i.p.) to stop epileptiform activity. FBApro treatment reduced the cortical lesion area (18.9 ± 4.1 mm2, n = 7) compared with VEH treatment (24.8 ± 5.7 mm2, n = 10, p < 0.05). FBApro treatment also showed a favorable effect on the white matter by reducing plasma levels of pNF-H, a biomarker of axonal injury, compared with VEH treatment (Cohen's delta 0.657). Both FBApro (368 ± 407 s) and FBApro+ (256 ± 327 s) treatments reduced the average cumulative seizure duration compared with VEH (896 ± 703 s, both p < 0.05). The FBApro+ treatment regimen also reduced the mean relative theta and alpha power and increased the mean relative gamma power in the electroencephalogram (p < 0.05). Our data identified FBA as a novel structure-based discovered compound with promising favorable effects on structural and functional recovery after TBI.

Evaluation of thiopyrano[2,3-d]thiazole derivatives as potential anticonvulsant agents

Anticonvulsant drug discovery has achieved significant progress; however, pharmacotherapy of epilepsy continues to be a challenge for modern medicine and pharmacy. To expand the chemical space of heterocycles as potential antiepileptic agents, herein we report on the synthesis and evaluation of anticonvulsant properties of a series of thiopyrano[2,3-d]thiazoles. The studied heterocycles are characterized by satisfactory drug-likeness and pharmacokinetics properties, calculated in silico using SwissADME. The anticonvulsant activity of thiopyrano[2,3-d]thiazole derivatives was evaluated in vivo using the subcutaneous pentylenetetrazole test. Three hits, that is, compounds 12, 14, and 16, that caused a pronounced anticonvulsant effect were identified. Derivatives 12, 14, and 16 positively affected the latent period of onset of clonic seizures, number of seizures, mortality rate, and duration of the seizure period of animals under experimental conditions. The anticonvulsant properties of compound 14 were equivalent to the effect of the reference drug, sodium valproate. All hit compounds are characterized by satisfying toxicity properties in the human lymphocytes and HEK293 cell line. The most active hit 14 possesses a potential affinity with the GABAA receptor in the molecular docking study and forms a stable complex in the molecular dynamics experiments equal to diazepam. Preliminary SAR results were obtained and discussed based on screening data.

An update on the novel methods for the discovery of antiseizure and antiepileptogenic medications: where are we in 2024?

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of around 30 antiseizure medications, 1/3 of patients with epilepsy fail to become seizure-free upon pharmacological treatment. Available medications provide adequate symptomatic control in two-thirds of patients, but disease-modifying drugs are still scarce. Recently, though, new paradigms have been explored.

AREAS COVERED

Three areas are reviewed in which a high degree of innovation in the search for novel antiseizure and antiepileptogenic medications has been implemented: development of novel screening approaches, search for novel therapeutic targets, and adoption of new drug discovery paradigms aligned with a systems pharmacology perspective.

EXPERT OPINION

In the past, worldwide leaders in epilepsy have reiteratively stated that the lack of progress in the field may be explained by the recurrent use of the same molecular targets and screening procedures to identify novel medications. This landscape has changed recently, as reflected by the new Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program and the introduction of many in vitro and in vivo models that could possibly improve our chances of identifying first-in-class medications that may control drug-resistant epilepsy or modify the course of disease. Other milestones include the study of new molecular targets for disease-modifying drugs and exploration of a systems pharmacology perspective to design new drugs.

Revisiting the concept of drug-resistant epilepsy: A TASK1 report of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force

Despite progress in the development of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), one third of people with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The working definition of DRE, proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 2010, helped identify individuals who might benefit from presurgical evaluation early on. As the incidence of DRE remains high, the TASK1 workgroup on DRE of the ILAE/American Epilepsy Society (AES) Joint Translational Task Force discussed the heterogeneity and complexity of its presentation and mechanisms, the confounders in drawing mechanistic insights when testing treatment responses, and barriers in modeling DRE across the lifespan and translating across species. We propose that it is necessary to revisit the current definition of DRE, in order to transform the preclinical and clinical research of mechanisms and biomarkers, to identify novel, effective, precise, pharmacologic treatments, allowing for earlier recognition of drug resistance and individualized therapies.

Identification of New Antiseizure Medication Candidates in Preclinical Animal Studies

Epilepsy is a multifactorial neurologic disease that often leads to many devastating disabilities and an enormous burden on the healthcare system. Until now, drug-resistant epilepsy has presented a major challenge for approximately 30% of the epileptic population. The present article summarizes the validated rodent models of seizures employed in pharmacological researches and comprehensively reviews updated advances of novel antiseizure candidates in the preclinical phase. Newly discovered compounds that demonstrate antiseizure efficacy in preclinical trials will be discussed in the review. It is inspiring that several candidates exert promising antiseizure activities in drug-resistant seizure models. The representative compounds consist of derivatives of hybrid compounds that integrate multiple approved antiseizure medications, novel positive allosteric modulators targeting subtype-selective γ-Aminobutyric acid type A receptors, and a derivative of cinnamamide. Although the precise molecular mechanism, pharmacokinetic properties, and safety are not yet fully clear in every novel antiseizure candidate, the adapted approaches to design novel antiseizure medications provide new insights to overcome drug-resistant epilepsy.

Impact of ABCC2 1249G>A and -24C>T Polymorphisms on Lacosamide Efficacy and Plasma Concentrations in Uygur Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy in China

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the ABCC2 1249G>A (rs2273697) and -24C>T (rs717620) polymorphisms on lacosamide (LCM) plasma concentrations and the efficacy of LCM in Uygur pediatric patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

We analyzed 231 pediatric patients with epilepsy, among which 166 were considered to be LCM responsive. For drug assays, 2-3 mL of venous blood was collected from each patient just before the morning LCM dose was administered (approximately 12 hours after the evening dose, steady-state LCM concentrations). The remaining samples after routine therapeutic drug monitoring were used for genotyping analysis. The χ 2 test and Fisher exact test were utilized for comparative analysis of the allelic and genotypic distribution of ABCC2 polymorphisms between the LCM-resistant and LCM-responsive groups. The Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze differences in plasma LCM concentration among pediatric patients with epilepsy with different genotypes.

RESULTS

Patients with the ABCC2 1249G>A GA genotype (0.7 ± 0.3 mcg/mL per kg/mg) and AA genotype (0.5 ± 0.3 mcg/mL per kg/mg) showed significantly ( P < 0.001) lower LCM concentration-to-dose (CD) ratios than patients with the GG genotype (1.0 ± 0.4 mcg/mL per kg/mg). Moreover, patients with the ABCC2 -24C>T CT genotype (0.6 ± 0.2 mcg/mL per kg/mg) and TT genotype (0.6 ± 0.3 mcg/mL per kg/mg) presented a significantly ( P < 0.001) lower LCM CD ratio than patients with the CC genotype (1.1 ± 0.4 mcg/mL per kg/mg).

CONCLUSIONS

The ABCC2 1249G>A (rs2273697) and ABCC2 -24C>T (rs717620) polymorphisms can affect plasma LCM concentrations and treatment efficacy among a population of Uygur pediatric patients with epilepsy, causing these patients to become resistant to LCM. In clinical practice, ABCC2 polymorphisms should be identified before LCM treatment, and then, the dosage should be adjusted for pediatric patients with epilepsy accordingly.

A complex systems view on the current hypotheses of epilepsy pharmacoresistance

Drug-resistant epilepsy remains to this day as a highly prevalent condition affecting around one-third of patients with epilepsy, despite all the research and the development of several new antiseizure medications (ASMs) over the last decades. Epilepsies are multifactorial complex diseases, commonly associated with psychiatric, neurological, and somatic comorbidities. Thus, to solve the puzzling problem of pharmacoresistance, the diagnosis and modeling of epilepsy and comorbidities need to change toward a complex system approach. In this review, we have summarized the sequence of events for the definition of epilepsies and comorbidities, the search for mechanisms, and the major hypotheses of pharmacoresistance, drawing attention to some of the many converging aspects between the proposed mechanisms, their supporting evidence, and comorbidities-related alterations. The use of systems biology applied to epileptology may lead to the discovery of new targets and the development of new ASMs, as may advance our understanding of the epilepsies and their comorbidities, providing much deeper insight on multidrug pharmacoresistance.

Polysaccharides, Next Potential Agent for the Treatment of Epilepsy?

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder. Current pharmacological therapies for epilepsy have limited efficacy that result in refractory epilepsy (RE). Owing to the limitations of conventional therapies, it is needed to develop new anti-epileptic drugs. The beneficial effects of polysaccharides from Chinese medicines, such as Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (COP) and Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides (GLP), for treatment of epilepsy include regulation of inflammatory factors, neurotransmitters, ion channels, and antioxidant reactions. Especially, polysaccharides could be digested by intestinal microbial flora, referred as “intestinal brain organ” or “adult’s second brain”, may be the target for treatment of epilepsy. Actually, polysaccharides can effectively improve the type and quantity of intestinal flora such as bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria and achieve the purpose of treating epilepsy. Therefore, polysaccharides are hypothesized and discussed as potential agent for treatment of epilepsy.

Antiseizure medication discovery: Recent and future paradigm shifts

Despite the ever-increasing number of available options for the treatment of epilepsies and the remarkable advances on the understanding of their pathophysiology, the proportion of refractory patients has remained approximately unmodified during the last 100 years. How efficient are we translating positive outcomes from basic research to clinical trials and/or the clinical scenario? It is possible that fresh thinking and exploration of new paradigms is required to arrive at truly novel therapeutic solutions, as seemingly proven by recently approved first-in-class antiseizure medications and drug candidates undergoing late clinical trials. Here, the author discusses some approximations in line with the network pharmacology philosophy, which may result in highly innovative (and, hopefully, safer and/or more efficacious) medications for the control of seizures, as embodied with some recent examples in the field, namely tailored multi-target agents and low-affinity ligands.

Central histaminergic signalling, neural excitability and epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by repeated and spontaneous epileptic seizures and is not well controlled by current medication. Traditional theory suggests that epilepsy results from an imbalance of excitatory glutamate neurons and inhibitory GABAergic neurons. However, new evidence from clinical and preclinical research suggests that histamine in the CNS plays an important role in the modulation of neural excitability and in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Many histamine receptor ligands have achieved curative effects in animal epilepsy models, among which the histamine H₃ receptor antagonist pitolisant has shown anti-epileptic effects in clinical trials. Recent studies, therefore, have focused on the potential action of histamine receptors to control and treat epilepsy. In this review, we summarize the findings from animal and clinical epilepsy research on the role of brain histamine and its receptors. We also identify current gaps in the research and suggest where further studies are most needed.

Transporter hypothesis in pharmacoresistant epilepsies Is it at the central or peripheral level?

The multidrug‐resistance (MDR) phenotype is typically observed in patients with refractory epilepsy (RE) whose seizures are not controlled despite receiving several combinations of more than two antiseizure medications (ASMs) directed against different ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors. Since the use of bromide in 1860, more than 20 ASMs have been developed; however, historically ~30% of cases of RE with MDR phenotype remains unchanged. Irrespective of metabolic biotransformation, the biodistribution of ASMs and their metabolites depends on the functional expression of some ATP‐binding cassette transporters (ABC‐t) in different organs, such as the blood‐brain barrier (BBB), bowel, liver, and kidney, among others. ABC‐t, such as P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp), multidrug resistance–associated protein (MRP‐1), and breast cancer–resistance protein (BCRP), are mainly expressed in excretory organs and play a critical role in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of all drugs. The transporter hypothesis can explain pharmacoresistance to a broad spectrum of ASMs, even when administered simultaneously. Since ABC‐t expression can be induced by hypoxia, inflammation, or seizures, a high frequency of uncontrolled seizures increases the risk of RE. These stimuli can induce ABC‐t expression in excretory organs and in previously non‐expressing (electrically responsive) cells, such as neurons or cardiomyocytes. In this regard, an alternative mechanism to the classical pumping function of P‐gp indicates that P‐gp activity can also produce a significant reduction in resting membrane potential (ΔΨ0 = −60 to −10 mV). P‐gp expression in neurons and cardiomyocytes can produce membrane depolarization and participate in epileptogenesis, heart failure, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. On this basis, ABC‐t play a peripheral role in controlling the PK of ASMs and their access to the brain and act at a central level, favoring neuronal depolarization by mechanisms independent of ion channels or neurotransmitters that current ASMs cannot control.

Noninvasive transcranial focal stimulation affects the convulsive seizure-induced P-glycoprotein expression and function in rats

Transcranial focal stimulation (TFS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation strategy that reduces seizure activity in different experimental models. Nevertheless, there is no information about the effects of TFS in the drug-resistant phenotype associated with P-glycoprotein (Pgp) overexpression. The present study focused on determining the effects of TFS on Pgp expression after an acute seizure induced by 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA). P-glycoprotein expression was analyzed by western blot in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of rats receiving 5 min of TFS (300 Hz, 50 mA, 200 μs, biphasic charge-balanced squared pulses) using a tripolar concentric ring electrode (TCRE) prior to administration of a single dose of MPA. An acute administration of MPA induced Pgp overexpression in cortex (68 ± 13.4%, p < 0.05 vs the control group) and hippocampus (48.5 ± 14%, p < 0.05, vs the control group). This effect was avoided when TFS was applied prior to MPA. We also investigated if TFS augments the effects of phenytoin in an experimental model of drug-resistant seizures induced by repetitive MPA administration. Animals with MPA-induced drug-resistant seizures received TFS alone or associated with phenytoin (75 mg/kg, i.p.). TFS alone did not modify the expression of the drug-resistant seizures. However, TFS combined with phenytoin reduced seizure intensity, an effect associated with a lower prevalence of major seizures (50%, p = 0.03 vs phenytoin alone). Our experiments demonstrated that TFS avoids the Pgp overexpression induced after an acute convulsive seizure. In addition, TFS augments the phenytoin effects in an experimental model of drug-resistant seizures. According with these results, it is indicated that TFS may represent a new neuromodulatory strategy to revert the drug-resistant phenotype.

Deceptology in cancer and vaccine sciences: Seeds of immune destruction-mini electric shocks in mitochondria: Neuroplasticity-electrobiology of response profiles and increased induced diseases in four generations - A hypothesis

From Rockefeller's support of patent medicine to Gates' patent vaccines, medical establishment invested a great deal in intellectual ignorance. Through the control over medical education and research it has created a public illusion to prop up corporate profit and encouraged the lust for money and power. An overview of data on cancer and vaccine sciences, the status of Americans' health, a survey of repeated failed projects, economic toxicity, and heavy drug consumption or addiction among young and old provide compelling evidence that in the twentieth century nearly all classic disease categories (congenital, inheritance, neonatal, or induced) shifted to increase induced diseases. Examples of this deceptology in ignoring or minimizing, and mocking fundamental discoveries and theories in cancer and vaccine sciences are attacks on research showing that (a), effective immunity is responsible for defending and killing pathogens and defective cancerous cells, correcting and repairing genetic mutations; (b) viruses cause cancer; and (c), abnormal gene mutations are often the consequences of (and secondary to) disturbances in effective immunity. The outcomes of cancer reductionist approaches to therapies reveal failure rates of 90% (+/-5) for solid tumors; loss of over 50 million lives and waste of $30-50 trillions on too many worthless, out-of-focus, and irresponsible projects. Current emphasis on vaccination of public with pathogen-specific vaccines and ingredients seems new terms for drugging young and old. Cumulative exposures to low level carcinogens and environmental hazards or high energy electronic devices (EMF; 5G) are additional triggers to vaccine toxicities (antigen-mitochondrial overload) or "seeds of immune destruction" that create mini electrical shocks (molecular sinks holes) in highly synchronized and regulated immune network that retard time-energy-dependent biorhythms in organs resulting in causes, exacerbations or consequences of mild, moderate or severe immune disorders. Four generations of drug-dependent Americans strongly suggest that medical establishment has practiced decades of intellectual deception through its claims on "war on cancer"; that cancer is 100, 200, or 1000 diseases; identification of "individual" genetic mutations to cure diseases; "vaccines are safe". Such immoral and unethical practices, along with intellectual harassment and bullying, censoring or silencing of independent and competent professionals ("Intellectual Me Too") present grave concerns, far greater compared with the sexual harassment of 'Me Too' movement that was recently spearheaded by NIH. The principal driving forces behind conducting deceptive and illogical medical/cancer and vaccine projects seem to be; (a) huge return of investment and corporate profit for selling drugs and vaccines; (b) maintenance of abusive power over public health; (c) global control of population growth via increased induction of diseases, infertility, decline in life-span, and death. An overview of accidental discoveries that we established and extended since 1980s, on models of acute and chronic ocular inflammatory diseases, provides series of the first evidence for a direct link between inflammation and multistep immune dysfunction in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Results are relevant to demonstrate that current emphasis on vaccinating the unborn, newborn, or infant would induce immediate or long-term immune disorders (eg, low birth weight, preterm birth, fatigue, autism, epilepsy/seizures, BBB leakage, autoimmune, neurodegenerative or digestive diseases, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular problems, or cancers). Vaccination of the unborn is likely to disturb trophoblast-embryo-fetus-placenta biology and orderly growth of embryo-fetus, alter epithelial-mesenchymal transition or constituent-inducible receptors, damage mitochondria, and diverse function of histamine-histidine pathways. Significant increased in childhood illnesses are likely due to toxicities of vaccine and incipient (eg, metals [Al, Hg], detergents, fetal tissue, DNA/RNA) that retard bioenergetics of mitochondria, alter polarization-depolarization balance of tumoricidal (Yin) and tumorigenic (Yang) properties of immunity. Captivated by complex electobiology of immunity, this multidisciplinary perspective is an attempt to initiate identifying bases for increased induction of immune disorders in three to four generations in America. We hypothesize that (a) gene-environment-immune biorhythms parallel neuronal function (brain neuroplasticity) with super-packages of inducible (adaptive or horizontal) electronic signals and (b) autonomic sympathetic and parasympathetic circuitry that shape immunity (Yin-Yang) cannot be explained by limited genomics (innate, perpendicular) that conventionally explain certain inherited diseases (eg, sickle cell anemia, progeria). Future studies should focus on deep learning of complex electrobiology of immunity that requires differential bioenergetics from mitochondria and cytoplasm. Approaches to limit or control excessive activation of gene-environment-immunity are keys to assess accurate disease risk formulations, prevent inducible diseases, and develop universal safe vaccines that promote health, the most basic human right.