Tectal corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neurons respond to fasting and a reactive stressor in the African Clawed Frog, Xenopus laevis

Early life nutrient restriction affects hypothalamic-pituitary-interrenal axis gene expression in a diet type-specific manner

Stressful experiences in early life can alter phenotypic expression later in life. For instance, in vertebrates, early life nutrient restriction can modify later life activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal/interrenal axis (the HPI in amphibians), including the up- and downstream regulatory components of glucocorticoid signaling. Early life nutrient restriction can also influence later life behavior and metabolism (e.g., fat accumulation). Yet, less is known about whether nutrient stress-induced carryover effects on HPA/HPI axis regulation can vary across environmental contexts, such as the type of diet on which nutrient restriction occurs. Here, we experimentally address this question using the plains spadefoot toad (Spea bombifrons), whose larvae develop in ephemeral habitats that impose intense competition over access to two qualitatively distinct diet types: detritus and live shrimp prey. Consistent with diet type-specific carryover effects of early life nutrient restriction on later life HPI axis regulation, we found that temporary nutrient restriction at the larval stage reduced juvenile (i.e., post-metamorphic) brain gene expression of an upstream glucocorticoid regulator (corticotropin-releasing hormone) and two downstream regulators (glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors) only on the shrimp diet. These patterns are consistent with known diet type-specific effects of larval nutrient restriction on juvenile corticosterone and behavior. Additionally, larval nutrient restriction increased juvenile body fat levels. Our study indicates that HPA/HPI axis regulatory responses to nutrient restriction can vary remarkably across diet types. Such diet type-specific regulation of the HPA/HPI axis might provide a basis for developmental or evolutionary decoupling of stress-induced carryover effects.

Sub-chronic administration of fluoxetine does not alter prey-capture or predator avoidance behaviors in adult South African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis)

Animals will halt foraging efforts and engage defensive behaviors in response to predator cues. Some researchers have proposed that the switch from appetitive to avoidance behavior resembles anxiety, but most work on this has been performed in a limited number of animal models, primarily zebrafish and rodents. We used adult South African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) to determine if the canonical anxiolytic fluoxetine alters predator-induced changes in appetitive and avoidance behavior in a laboratory-based trade-off task that mimics foraging/predator avoidance tradeoffs in the wild. We hypothesized that sub-chronic fluoxetine treatment (20 d) would not affect baseline behavior but would reverse predator-induced changes in food intake, appetitive and avoidance behavior, and the abundance of anxiety related gene transcripts in the optic tectum, a brain area central to ecological decision making in frogs. We found that fluoxetine significantly reduced baseline locomotion compared to vehicle-treated animals. Fluoxetine had no effect on appetitive and avoidance behaviors that were sensitive to predator cues in this assay and did not alter any of the anxiety-related transcripts in the tectum. We conclude that while peripheral sub-chronic administration of fluoxetine significantly reduces locomotion, it does not modify predator-induced changes in approach and avoidance behaviors in this assay. Our findings are not consistent with visual predator cues causing state anxiety in adult frogs.

Tectal CRFR1 receptor involvement in avoidance and approach behaviors in the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis

Animals in the wild must balance food intake with vigilance for predators in order to survive. The optic tectum plays an important role in the integration of external (predators) and internal (energy status) cues related to predator defense and prey capture. However, the role of neuromodulators involved in tectal sensorimotor processing is poorly studied. Recently we showed that tectal CRFR1 receptor activation decreases food intake in the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, suggesting that CRF may modulate food intake/predator avoidance tradeoffs. Here we use a behavioral assay modeling food intake and predator avoidance to test the role of CRFR1 receptors and energy status in this tradeoff. We tested the predictions that 1) administering the CRFR1 antagonist NBI-27914 via the optic tecta will increase food intake and feeding-related behaviors in the presence of a predator, and 2) that prior food deprivation, which lowers tectal CRF content, will increase food intake and feeding-related behaviors in the presence of a predator. Pre-treatment with NBI-27914 did not prevent predator-induced reductions in food intake. Predator exposure altered feeding-related behaviors in a predictable manner. Pretreatment with NBI-27914 reduced the response of certain behaviors to a predator but also altered behaviors irrelevant of predator presence. Although 1-wk of food deprivation altered some non-feeding behaviors related to energy conservation strategy, food intake in the presence of a predator was not altered by prior food deprivation. Collectively, our data support a role for tectal CRFR1 in modulating discrete behavioral responses during predator avoidance/foraging tradeoffs.

The transcripts of CRF and CRF receptors under fasting stress in Dabry's sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus Dumeril)

Dabry's sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus Dumeril, 1868) belongs to Sturgeon and is distributed throughout the mainstream of the upper Yangtze River. While there is little research onphysiological mechanism of Dabry's sturgeon, such as feeding regulation by the CRF system. At present, CRF is thought to regulate feeding via CRF receptors (CRF-Rs) in several mammals, but relatively few studies of CRF and feeding exist in teleosts. Herein, the transcripts of CRF and CRF-Rs under fasting stress in Dabry's sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus Dumeril) have been explored. A full length Dabry's sturgeon CRF cDNA of 953 bp was identified, which contained a 447 bp open reading frame (ORF). A partial CRF-R1 cDNA of 1053 bp and CRF-R2 cDNA of 906 bp corresponding to the coding sequences (CDS) was obtained. In addition, analysis of the tissue distribution of CRF and CRF-Rs mRNAs revealed they were widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Furthermore, periprandial (preprandial and postprandial), fasting, and re-feeding experiments revealed CRF mRNA was significantly increased 1 h and 3 h after feeding and CRF and CRF-Rs transcripts were significantly decreased after 10 days fasting, and significantly increased on re-feeding on day 10. These results suggest that CRF and CRF-Rs might regulate feeding by acting as satiety factors.

Tectal CRFR1 receptors modulate food intake and feeding behavior in the South African clawed frog Xenopus laevis

The optic tectum and superior colliculus rapidly inhibit food intake when a visual threat is present. Previous work indicates that CRF, acting on CRFR1 receptors, may play a role in tectal inhibition of feeding behavior and food intake. Here we test the hypothesis that tectal CRFR1 receptors modulate food intake and feeding behavior in juvenile Xenopus laevis. We performed five experiments to test the following questions: 1) Does tectal CRF injection decrease food intake/feeding behavior? 2) Does a selective CRFR1 antagonist block CRF effects on feeding/feeding behavior? 3) Does a reactive stressor decrease food intake/feeding behavior? 4) Does a selective CRFR1 antagonist block reactive stress-induced decrease in feeding/feeding behavior? 5) Does food deprivation increase food intake/feeding behavior? Tectal CRF injections reduced food intake and influenced exploratory behavior, hindlimb kicks, and time in contact with food. These effects were blocked by the selective R1 antagonist NBI-27914. Exposure to a reactive stressor decreased food intake and this effect was blocked by NBI-27914. Neither food intake or feeding behavior changed following 1 wk of food deprivation. Overall, we conclude that activation of tectal CRFR1 inhibits food intake in juvenile X. laevis. Furthermore, tectal CRFR1 receptors appear to be involved in the reduction of food intake that occurs in response to a reactive stressor.

How Metabolic State May Regulate Fear: Presence of Metabolic Receptors in the Fear Circuitry

Metabolic status impacts on the emotional brain to induce behavior that maintains energy balance. While hunger suppresses the fear circuitry to promote explorative food-seeking behavior, satiety or obesity may increase fear to prevent unnecessary risk-taking. Here we aimed to unravel which metabolic factors, that transfer information about the acute and the chronic metabolic status, are of primary importance to regulate fear, and to identify their sites of action within fear-related brain regions. We performed a de novo analysis of central and peripheral metabolic factors that can penetrate the blood–brain barrier using genome-wide expression data across the mouse brain from the Allen Brain Atlas (ABA). The central fear circuitry, as defined by subnuclei of the amygdala, the afferent hippocampus, the medial prefrontal cortex and the efferent periaqueductal gray, was enriched with metabolic receptors. Some of their corresponding ligands were known to modulate fear (e.g., estrogen and thyroid hormones) while others had not been associated with fear before (e.g., glucagon, ACTH). Additionally, several of these enriched metabolic receptors were coexpressed with well-described fear-modulating genes (Crh, Crhr1, or Crhr2). Co-expression analysis of monoamine markers and metabolic receptors suggested that monoaminergic nuclei have differential sensitivity to metabolic alterations. Serotonergic neurons expressed a large number of metabolic receptors (e.g., estrogen receptors, fatty acid receptors), suggesting a wide responsivity to metabolic changes. The noradrenergic system seemed to be specifically sensitive to hypocretin/orexin modulation. Taken together, we identified a number of novel metabolic factors (glucagon, ACTH) that have the potential to modulate the fear response. We additionally propose novel cerebral targets for metabolic factors (e.g., thyroid hormones) that modulate fear, but of which the sites of action are (largely) unknown.