The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass

Demons-Meigs syndrome caused by a giant ovarian fibroma: A case report

Demons-Meigs syndrome is a very rare entity. It combines a benign ovarian "fibroma-like" tumor with ascites and hydrothorax. The notion of benignancy is the key point. CA-125 levels are most of the time normal, but high levels can be observed in rare cases which makes it difficult to have a diagnostic. We present here the case of a 43-year-old female patient who presented with abdominopelvic pain. Imaging discovered a 30 cm large intraabdominal mass with ascites and bilateral pleural effusion. Surgical resection of the tumor was performed, and pathology identified an ovarian fibroma. No postintervention complications were observed, with resorption of the ascites and hydrothorax.

Human epididymis protein 4: Analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey data

BACKGROUND

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a tumor marker overexpressed in ovarian cancer and is commonly utilized to aid with diagnosis of an adnexal mass. HE4 levels vary based on pregnancy, age, menopausal status, and tobacco use.

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this study was to evaluate population-based data to examine factors that affect HE4 among adult women in the United States and stratify levels of HE4 by demographic and gynecologic factors.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 2,480 women aged 20 + who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2002). From these cross-sectional data, serum HE4 and cotinine, a marker of tobacco exposure, were combined with demographic and interview data. Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were based on serum creatinine, age, sex, and race. Other variables of interest included menopausal status, pregnancy, and various gynecologic factors. Summary HE4 data are provided as geometric means with associated 95 % confidence intervals.

RESULTS

HE4 levels were independently associated with age, renal function, and nicotine use, all p < 0.001. Pre-menopausal women with a history of endometriosis were found to have elevated HE4 levels compared to those without, p < 0.01; however, we found no such difference among post-menopausal women. Adjusting for age, no differences in HE4 were found based on race/ethnicity, p = 0.29. HE4 levels showed statistically significant associations with income level; however, these were small and clinically irrelevant.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evaluation of HE4 levels among a data set representative of 98.5 million non-institutionalized women in the United States and gives insight into extraneous factors that may influence these levels.

Ovarian Cancer surgical consideration is markedly improved by the neural network powered-MIA3G multivariate index assay

Background

Surgery remains the main treatment option for an adnexal mass suspicious of ovarian cancer. The malignancy rate is, however, only 10-15% in women undergoing surgery. This results in a high number of unnecessary surgeries. A surveillance-based approach is recommended to form the basis for surgical referrals. We have previously reported the clinical performance of MIA3G, a deep neural network-based algorithm, for assessing ovarian cancer risk. In this study, we show that MIA3G markedly improves the surgical selection for women presenting with adnexal masses.

Methods

MIA3G employs seven serum biomarkers, patient age, and menopausal status. Serum samples were collected from 785 women (IQR: 39-55 years) across 12 centers that presented with adnexal masses. MIA3G risk scores were calculated for all subjects in this cohort. Physicians had no access to the MIA3G risk score when deciding upon a surgical referral. The performance of MIA3G for surgery referral was compared to clinical and surgical outcomes. MIA3G was also tested in an independent cohort comprising 29 women across 14 study sites, in which the physicians had access to and utilized MIA3G prior to surgical consideration.

Results

When compared to the actual number of surgeries (n = 207), referrals based on the MIA3G score would have reduced surgeries by 62% (n = 79). The reduction was higher in premenopausal patients (77%) and in patients ≤55 years old (70%). In addition, a 431% improvement in malignancy prediction would have been observed if physicians had utilized MIA3G scores for surgery selection. The accuracy of MIA3G referral was 90.00% (CI 87.89-92.11), while only 9.18% accuracy was observed when the MIA3G score was not used. These results were corroborated in an independent multi-site study of 29 patients in which the physicians utilized MIA3G in surgical consideration. The surgery reduction was 87% in this cohort. Moreover, the accuracy and concordance of MIA3G in this independent cohort were each 96.55%.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that MIA3G markedly augments the physician's decisions for surgical intervention and improves malignancy prediction in women presenting with adnexal masses. MIA3G utilization as a clinical diagnostic tool might help reduce unnecessary surgeries.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Selected Biomarkers and Their Combinations in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer

One of the greatest challenges in modern gynecological oncology is ovarian cancer. Despite the numerous studies currently being conducted, it is still sometimes detected at late clinical stages, where the prognosis is unfavorable. One significant contributing factor is the absence of sensitive and specific parameters that could aid in early diagnosis. An ideal screening test, in view of the low incidence of ovarian cancer, should have a sensitivity of greater than 75% and a specificity of at least 99.6%. To enhance sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic panels are being created by combining individual markers. The drive to develop better screening tests for ovarian cancer focuses on modern diagnostic methods based on molecular testing, which in turn aims to find increasingly effective biomarkers. Currently, researchers' efforts are focused on the search for a complementary parameter to those most commonly used that would satisfactorily enhance the sensitivity and specificity of assays. Several biomarkers, including microRNA molecules, autoantibodies, cDNA, adipocytokines, and galectins, are currently being investigated by researchers. This article reviews recent studies comparing the sensitivity and specificity of selected parameters used alone and in combination to increase detection of ovarian cancer at an early stage.

Resonating with Cellular Pathways: Transcriptome Insights into Nonthermal Bioeffects of Middle Infrared Light Stimulation and Vibrational Strong Coupling on Cell Proliferation and Migration

Middle infrared stimulation (MIRS) and vibrational strong coupling (VSC) have been separately applied to physically regulate biological systems but scarcely compared with each other, especially at identical vibrational frequencies, though they both involve resonant mechanism. Taking cell proliferation and migration as typical cell-level models, herein, we comparatively studied the nonthermal bioeffects of MIRS and VSC with selecting the identical frequency (53.5 THz) of the carbonyl vibration. We found that both MIRS and VSC can notably increase the proliferation rate and migration capacity of fibroblasts. Transcriptome sequencing results reflected the differential expression of genes related to the corresponding cellular pathways. This work not only sheds light on the synergistic nonthermal bioeffects from the molecular level to the cell level but also provides new evidence and insights for modifying bioreactions, further applying MIRS and VSC to the future medicine of frequencies.

The effectiveness of CA125 and HE4 as clinical prognostic markers in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in predicting survival outcomes based on breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutational status in epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Medical records of 448 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at a single tertiary institution in Korea were retrospectively analyzed. Area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed using the CA125 and HE4 values after surgery and 3 cycles of chemotherapy to predict 1-year survival based on the BRCA mutational status. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to obtain progression-free and overall survival to evaluate CA125 and HE4 effectiveness in predicting survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients were analyzed, including 180 (42.6%) who underwent interval debulking surgery (IDS) and 243 (57.4%) who underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS). BRCA mutations were observed in 37 (15.2%) and 44 (22.4%) patients in the PDS and IDS groups, respectively. CA125 and HE4 normalization demonstrated the highest specificity in patients with or without BRCA mutations, with specificities of 97.1% and 99.1% in the PDS group and 78.6% and 86.2% in the IDS group, respectively. Normalizing HE4 alone may be an effective prognostic marker, with an area under the curve of 0.774 and specificity of 75.0%, in patients with BRCA mutations.

CONCLUSION

Normalizing both biomarkers emerged as the most effective predictive marker for the 1-year recurrence rate, regardless of BRCA mutational status. A negative HE4 value can be a useful predictor for 1-year recurrence-free survival in patients with BRCA mutations.

HE4 and CA-125 kinetics to predict outcome in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: the META4 clinical trial

HE4 and CA-125 are used for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) screening, diagnosis, and follow-up. Our objective was to study HE4 and CA-125 kinetics in patients treated for recurrent EOC. Serum samples were prospectively collected before the first chemotherapy cycle and every 3 months until disease progression. Data from 89/101 patients could be analyzed. At baseline, the median CA-125 and HE4 concentrations were 210 IU/L (7-10,310) and 184 pM (31-4,836). Among the 12 patients (13%) with normal CA-125 (<35 IU/L) concentration, eight had HE4 concentration ≥75 pM, and among the 16 patients with normal HE4 concentration (18%), 12 had increased CA-125 concentration. The median nadir concentrations were 31 IU/L (3-8,744) for CA-125 and 75 pM (20-4,836) for HE4. The median times to nadir were 14 (0-130) weeks for CA-125 and 12 (0-52) weeks for HE4. In multivariate analysis, CA-125 and HE4 nadir concentrations (<35 IU/L, HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.72 and<75 pM, HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79) and time to CA-125 and HE4 nadir (>14 weeks, HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20-0.70 and >12 weeks, HR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23-0.83) were prognostic factors of progression-free survival. More investigations on HE4 kinetics could help to better monitor patients with CA-125 concentration within normal values.

A disposable impedimetric immunosensor for the analysis of CA125 in human serum samples

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is the most common biomarker used to diagnose and monitor ovarian cancer progression for the last four decades, and precise detection of its levels in blood serum is crucial. In this work, label-free impedimetric CA125 immunosensors were fabricated by using screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with poly toluidine blue (PTB) (in deep eutectic solvent)/gold nanoparticles (AuNP) for the sensitive, environmentally friendly, economical, and practical analysis of CA125. The materials of PTBDES and AuNP were characterized by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR), Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM), and X-ray Diffraction (XRD). The analysis of the CA125 was performed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the developed immunosensor. The immunosensor's repeatability, reproducibility, reusability, selectivity, and storage stability were examined. The developed label-free immunosensor allowed the determination of CA125 in fast, good repeatability and a low limit of detection (1.20 pg mL-1) in the linear range of 5-100 pg mL-1. The stable surface of the fabricated immunosensor was successfully regenerated ten times. The application of immunosensors in commercial human blood serum was performed, and good recoveries were achieved. The disposable label-free impedimetric CA125 immunosensor developed for the rapid and practical detection of CA125 is a candidate for use in point-of-care tests in clinical applications of ovarian cancer.

Comparison of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm and Copenhagen Index for the preoperative assessment of Japanese women with ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) in their ability to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and malignant ovarian tumors (MLOT) from benign ovarian tumors (BeOT) in Japanese women.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically diagnosed ovarian tumors were included in this study. The study validated the diagnostic performance of ROMA and CPH-I.

RESULTS

Among the 463 Japanese women included in this study, 312 had BeOT, 99 had EOC, and 52 had other MLOT. The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUCs) of ROMA (0.89) and CPH-I (0.89) for distinguishing EOC from BeOT were significantly higher than that of CA125 (0.82) (CA 125 vs. ROMA; p = 0.002, vs. CPH-I; p < 0.001). The ROC-AUCs of ROMA (0.82) and CPH-I (0.81) for distinguishing MLOT from BeOT were significantly higher than that of CA125 (0.75) (CA 125 vs. ROMA: p = 0.003, vs. CPH-I: p < 0.001). The sensitivity (SN)/specificity (SP) of ROMA and CPH-I for distinguishing EOC from BeOT at standard cut-off points were 69%/90%, and 69%/90%, respectively, those for distinguishing MLOT from BeOT were 54%/90%, and 55%/90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ROMA and CPH-I performed comparably well and better than CA125 in distinguishing EOC from BeOT in Japanese women. ROMA and CHP-I should be used with caution in practical situations, where all histological possibilities for must be considered, because the SNs of ROMA and CPH-I were only 54% and 55%.

Revised Cut-Off Value of Human Epididymis Protein 4 Enhances Its Use as an Ovarian Tumor Marker

OBJECTIVES

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), a protein secreted by ovarian tumors, has been used as an ovarian tumor marker. This study aimed to improve the usefulness of HE4 to detect malignant ovarian tumors by reviewing the cut-off values.

DESIGN

A retrospective study without intervention was conducted.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-nine healthy women (premenopausal, 126; postmenopausal, 23) and 24 patients with ovarian tumors (malignant, 12; benign, 12) participated in the study.

SETTING

The study used the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a university hospital in Japan and the university hospital as a workplace from 2016 to 2018.

METHODS

The basic performance of the HE4 assay was evaluated, and the serum HE4 levels of participants were measured. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed using the HE4 data of the patients.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in HE4 levels between the pre- and postmenopausal groups of healthy women. When the global cut-off values (premenopausal, 70 pmol/L; postmenopausal, 140 pmol/L) were adopted, the clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 41.7%, 91.7%, 83.3%, and 61.1%, respectively. Based on the results of the receiver operating characteristic analysis, we set the HE4 cut-off level at 60 pmol/L, regardless of the menopausal status. With the newly set cut-off value, the clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 66.7%, 91.7%, 88.9%, and 73.3%, respectively. That is, the clinical sensitivity of HE4 was improved without lowering specificity.

LIMITATIONS

The small number of subjects and the fact that the health status of the healthy women was evaluated based on questionnaires were limitations to the study.

CONCLUSION

A clinically useful cut-off value for HE4 as an ovarian tumor marker was established regardless of the menopausal status of the women, with improved clinical sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value without lowering specificity. Currently, different cut-off values for HE4 in pre- and postmenopausal women are used globally. The cut-off value for CA125 was the same between pre- and postmenopausal women. Therefore, with the newly established cut-off value, HE4 can be used more conveniently in a non-specialized setting, especially when it is used in combination with CA125.

Tumor Markers and Their Diagnostic Significance in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is characterized by silent progression and late-stage diagnosis. It is critical to detect and accurately diagnose the disease early to improve survival rates. Tumor markers have emerged as valuable tools in the diagnosis and management of OC, offering non-invasive and cost-effective options for screening, monitoring, and prognosis.

PURPOSE

This paper explores the diagnostic importance of various tumor markers including CA-125, CA15-3, CA 19-9, HE4,hCG, inhibin, AFP, and LDH, and their impact on disease monitoring and treatment response assessment.

METHODS

Article searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Keywords used for the searching process were "Ovarian cancer", "Cancer biomarkers", "Early detection", "Cancer diagnosis", "CA-125","CA 15-3","CA 19-9", "HE4","hCG", "inhibin", "AFP", "LDH", and others.

RESULTS

HE4, when combined with CA-125, shows improved sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage detection. Additionally, hCG holds promise as a prognostic marker, aiding treatment response prediction and outcome assessment. Novel markers like microRNAs, DNA methylation patterns, and circulating tumor cells offer potential for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and personalized management. Integrating these markers into a comprehensive panel may improve sensitivity and specificity in ovarian cancer diagnosis. However, careful interpretation of tumor marker results is necessary, considering factors such as age, menopausal status, and comorbidities. Further research is needed to validate and refine diagnostic algorithms, optimizing the clinical significance of tumor markers in ovarian cancer management. In conclusion, tumor markers such as CA-125, CA15-3, CA 19-9, HE4, and hCG provide valuable insights into ovarian cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis, with the potential to enhance early detection.

Comparison of Human Epididymis Protein 4, Cancer Antigen 125, and Ultrasound Prediction Model in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses

Background

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of carcinogenic antigen (CA) 125, (HE)-4 (Human epididymis protein 4), and ultrasound (International Ovarian Tumor Analysis [IOTA]) Simple Rules individually and to derive a composite score in the differentiating ovarian cancer from benign ovarian mass.

Subjects and Methods

Consecutive patients (n = 100) with pelvic mass admitted during February 2018-August 2019 were included prospectively. Patients with either known case of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or metastatic EOC were excluded. The primary outcome was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CA-125, HE-4, and IOTA Simple Rules in predicting benign from malignant mass independently, while secondary outcome was derivation of a new model incorporating these variables using multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict benign from malignant lesions. Receiver operator curve (ROC) was drawn to redefine the best-performing cutoff values and difference between area under the ROC (AUROC) were compared by DeLong's method.

Results

Out of 100 cases of adnexal mass selected, the sensitivity and specificity of CA-125 were 73.8% and 77.6%, HE-4 were 90.5% and 87.9%, and IOTA Simple Rules were 92.9% and 81.0%. CA-125, HE-4, and IOTA Simple Rules were independently associated with the likelihood of malignancy/borderline (P < 0.001). The area under the curve for the "composite score" (AUC = 0.93) was the highest and was significantly better than that of CA-125 (AUC = 0.786) (P = 0.004 using DeLong's test) and comparable with HE-4 (AUROC = 0.90; P = 0.128 using DeLong's Test).

Conclusion

The sensitivity and specificity of HE-4 and IOTA Simple Rules for predicting malignant ovarian tumor was better than those of CA-125. The diagnostic performance of "composite score" was comparable to those of either HE-4 or IOTA Simple Rules and significantly better than CA-125.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Copenhagen Index in ovarian malignancy: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic value of the Copenhagen index for ovarian malignancy.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched throughout June 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan 5.3. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve was calculated.

RESULTS

Ten articles, including 11 studies with a total of 5266 patients, were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.82 [95% CI (0.80-0.83)], 0.88 [95% CI (0.87-0.89)], and 57.31 [95% CI (32.84-100.02)], respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve and the Q index were 0.9545 and 0.8966, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review shows that the sensitivity and specificity of the Copenhagen index are high enough for it to be used in a clinical setting to provide accurate ovarian cancer diagnosis without considering menopausal status.

Individual recombinant repeats of MUC16 display variable binding to CA125 antibodies

BACKGROUND

Despite its importance in the clinical management of ovarian cancer, the CA125 biomarker - located on the mucin protein MUC16 - is still not completely understood. Questions remain about MUC16's function and structure, specifically the identity and location of the CA125 epitopes.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to characterize the interaction of individual recombinant repeats from the tandem repeat domain of MUC16 with antibodies used in the clinical CA125 II test.

METHODS

Using E. coli expression, we isolated nine repeats from the putative antigenic domain of CA125. Amino acid composition of recombinant repeats was confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. We characterized the binding of four antibodies - OC125, M11, "OC125-like," and "M11-like" - to nine recombinant repeats using Western blotting, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and localized surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Each recombinant repeat was recognized by a different combination of CA125 antibodies. OC125 and "OC125-like" antibodies did not bind the same set of recombinant repeats, nor did M11 and "M11-like" antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Characterization of the interactions between MUC16 recombinant repeats and CA125 antibodies will contribute to ongoing efforts to identify the CA125 epitopes and improve our understanding of this important biomarker.

Point-of-care testing: a disposable label-free electrochemical CA125 and HE4 immunosensors for early detection of ovarian cancer

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) are critical biomarkers for ovarian cancer diagnosis and progression monitoring; therefore, sensitive determination of their levels in body fluids is crucial. In recent study, label-free CA125 and HE4 immunosensors were prepared using disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with reduced graphene oxide, polythionine, and gold nanoparticles for the sensitive, fast, and practical determination of CA125 and HE4. Differential pulse voltammetry, square wave voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy methods were used for the electrochemical determination of antigens in four different linear ranges (1-100 pg mL^- 1, 0.01-10 ng mL^- 1, 10-50 ng mL^- 1, and 50-500 ng mL^- 1). High sensitivity, low limit of detection, and limit of quantification were obtained for each linear range with a correlation coefficient above 0.99. The application stability of CA125 and HE4 immunosensors was determined as 60 days, and the storage stability was determined as 16 weeks. Immunosensors showed high selectivity in nine different antigen mixtures. The reusability of the immunosensors has been tested up to 9 cycles. The Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm score% values were calculated using the concentration of CA125 and HE4 in the blood serum and evaluated in terms of ovarian cancer risk. For the point-of-care testing, CA125 and HE4 levels at pg mL^- 1 concentration were measured in blood serum samples using the developed immunosensors and a hand-held electrochemical reader in approximately 20-30 s, and high recoveries were obtained. These disposable label-free immunosensors are user-friendly and can be used in point-of-care tests for rapid and practical detection of CA125 and HE4 with high selectivity, sensitivity, and repeatability.

HE4 overexpression in mice leads to leydig cell hyperplasia and spermatogensis impairment: Pathological implications for oligospermia

Previous studies have shown that HE4 cancer biomarker promoted cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in mouse xenograft models. Interestingly, HE4 levels are significantly increased in the seminal plasma of oligoasthenospermia patients, raising a question on HE4 role(s) in spermatogenesis. We constructed an HE4 overexpression mouse model (HE4-OE), and observed that HE4-OE male adult mice had small testes, low sperm counts, and elevated serum/testis testosterone levels. These mice exhibited disorganized seminiferous tubules and impaired spermatogenesis. HE4 overexpression concentrated in Leydig cells, and these cells had hyperplasia and increased testosterone biosynthesis. Mechanistic studies indicated that the impaired spermatogenesis was likely caused by a local and direct action of HE4 in the testis rather than by a hypothalamus/pituitary-initiated dysregulation. The new findings reveal a novel HE4 function in male reproductive system, and suggest the existence of a subtype of primary oligoasthenospermia characterized by HE4 overexpression, Leydig cell hyperplasia, and elevated testosterone levels.

A label-free dual immunosensor for the simultaneous electrochemical determination of CA125 and HE4 biomarkers for the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer

The blood levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) are measured in the diagnosis and progression monitoring of ovarian cancer (OC), and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) score% values are calculated for cancer risk assessment. For the first time, disposable dual screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with reduced graphene oxide, polythionine, and gold nanoparticles were used to fabricate label-free electrochemical dual CA125-HE4 immunosensors for the sensitive, fast, and practical simultaneous determination of CA125 and HE4. DPV and SWV methods were used to simultaneously determine antigens in two different linear ranges (1-100 pg mL^-1 and 1-50 ng mL^-1). High sensitivity, low LOD, and LOQ were obtained for two linear ranges with a correlation coefficient above 0.99. The application stability of the dual CA125-HE4 immunosensors was determined as 60 days, and the storage stability was determined as 16 weeks. The dual immunosensors exhibited high selectivity in eight different antigen mixtures. The reusability of the dual immunosensors has been tested up to 9 cycles. ROMA score% values for pre-menopausal and post-menopausal status were calculated using the concentration of CA125 and HE4 in the blood serum and assessing OC risk. The disposable dual immunosensors can be used in point-of-care tests for rapid and practical simultaneous determination of CA125 and HE4 with high selectivity, sensitivity, and repeatability.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in Indian women with suspected ovarian cancer

Background

"Liquid biopsy," where body fluids are screened for biomarkers, is gathering substantial research. We aimed to examine women with suspected ovarian cancer for the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and study its role in prediction of chemoresistance and survival.

Methods

Magnetic powder labeled monoclonal antibodies for epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), mucin 1 cell surface associated, mucin 16 cell surface associated, or carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), were prepared according to the manufacturer's protocol. Expression of three ovarian cancer related genes was detected in CTCs using multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. CTCs and serum CA125 were measured in 100 patients with suspected ovarian cancer. Correlations with clinicopathological parameters and treatment were analyzed.

Results

CTCs were detected in 18/70 (25.7%) of women with malignancy compared to 0/30 (0.0%) in those with benign gynecologic diseases (P = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the CTC test for predicting a malignant histology in pelvic masses were 27.7% (95% CI: 16.3%, 37.7%) and 100% (95% CI: 85.8%, 100%), respectively. The number of CTCs correlated with stage of ovarian cancer (P = 0.030). The presence of EpCAM + CTC at primary diagnosis in ovarian cancer was found to be an independent predictor of a poor progression free survival (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.4; P = 0.010), overall survival (HR, 2.6; 95% CI,1.1-5.6; P = 0.019), and resistance to chemotherapy (OR 8.6; 95% CI, 1.8-43.7; P = 0.009).

Conclusion

Expression of EpCAM + CTC in ovarian cancer predicts platinum resistance and poor prognosis. This information could be further used in investigating anti-EpCAM-targeted therapies in ovarian cancer.

Sensitive Detection of the Human Epididymis Protein-4 (HE4) Ovarian Cancer Biomarker through a Sandwich-Type Immunoassay Method with Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Detection of cancer before the appearance of any symptoms is crucial for successful treatment. Early detection is, however, very challenging, particularly for the types of cancer with few or no symptoms at early stages, such as epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Developing a user-friendly method that can detect biomarkers with sufficient selectivity, sensitivity, and reproducibility is a promising approach for overcoming the challenges of early detection of EOC. In this study, we report a sandwich-type microparticle immunoassay for sensitive detection of the HE4 biomarker with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Here, we cross-linked elemental particles to a specific functional group of the targeted biomolecules based on a covalent and non-covalent linking chemistry to improve the sensitivity and selectivity of biomarker detection, in which Fe₃O₄ and SiO₂ microparticles were used to conjugate and purify the antibody-antigen in complex media. Simultaneous detection of Fe and Si from a magnetically purified assay significantly improves the HE4 biomarker's detectability, in which HE4 was detected with a limit of detection of 0.0022 pM. We also determined the coupling ratio between HE4 and silica particles using a silicon calibration curve.

A Dual Biomarker TK1 Protein and CA125 or HE4-Based Algorithm as a Better Diagnostic Tool than ROMA Index in Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

The early detection of ovarian cancer is presently not effective, and it is crucial to establish biomarkers for the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer to improve the survival of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) in combination with CA 125 or HE4 to serve as a potential diagnostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer. In this study, a set of 198 serum samples consisting of 134 ovarian tumor patients and 64 healthy age-matched controls were analyzed. The TK1 protein levels in serum samples were determined using the AroCell TK 210 ELISA.

RESULTS

A combination of TK1 protein with CA 125 or HE4 showed better performance than either of them alone in the differentiation of early stage ovarian cancer from the healthy control group, but also a significantly better performance than the ROMA index. However, this was not observed using a TK1 activity test in combination with the other markers. Furthermore, the combination of TK1 protein and CA 125 or HE4 could differentiate early stage disease (stage I, II) more efficiently from advanced-stage (stage III, IV) disease (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TK1 protein with CA 125 or HE4 increased the potential of detecting ovarian cancer at early stages.

Urine CA125 and HE4 for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer in Symptomatic Women

The symptoms of ovarian cancer are vague, and current risk assessment tools such as serum CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound scan fail to reliably detect the disease early. This study aimed to evaluate urine CA125 and HE4 as diagnostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer in symptomatic women. Paired urine and serum samples were collected from women undergoing treatment for ovarian cancer (cases) or investigations for gynaecological symptoms (controls). Biomarkers were measured using an automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay analyser. Standard diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated. In total, 114 women were included, of whom 17 (15%) were diagnosed with an epithelial ovarian malignancy. Levels of urine CA125 and HE4 were significantly elevated in women with ovarian cancer compared to controls [CA125: 8.5 U/mL (IQR: 2.4-19.5) vs. 2.3 U/mL (IQR: 1.0-6.4), p = 0.01. HE4: 12.0 nmol/L (IQR: 10.3-23.1) vs. 6.7 nmol/L (IQR: 3.4-13.6), p = 0.006]. Urine CA125 and HE4 detected ovarian cancer with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.55-0.82) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.82), respectively (p = 0.73). A combination of urine CA125 and HE4 at optimal thresholds had a sensitivity of 82.4% (95% CI: 56.6-96.2) and was comparable to the sensitivity of serum CA125 [88.2% (95% CI: 63.6-98.5)]. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings, standardise urine collection, and evaluate optimal biomarker thresholds. Urine CA125 and HE4 may be useful non-invasive diagnostic tools to triage women for formal ovarian cancer investigations.

Individual recombinant repeats of MUC16 display variable binding to CA125 antibodies

BACKGROUND

Despite its importance in the clinical management of ovarian cancer, the CA125 biomarker-located on the mucin protein MUC16-is still not completely understood. Questions remain about MUC16's function and structure, specifically the identity and location of the CA125 epitopes.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to characterize the interaction of individual recombinant repeats from the tandem repeat domain of MUC16 with antibodies used in the clinical CA125 II test.

METHODS

Using E. coli expression, we isolated nine repeats from the putative antigenic domain of CA125. Amino acid composition of recombinant repeats was confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. We characterized the binding of four antibodies-OC125, M11, "OC125-like," and "M11-like"-to nine recombinant repeats using Western blotting, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and localized surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Each recombinant repeat was recognized by a different combination of CA125 antibodies. OC125 and "OC125-like" antibodies did not bind the same set of recombinant repeats, nor did M11 and "M11-like" antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Characterization of the interactions between MUC16 recombinant repeats and CA125 antibodies will contribute to ongoing efforts to identify the CA125 epitopes and improve our understanding of this important biomarker.

The role of urine and serum biomarkers in the early detection of ovarian epithelial tumours

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of gynaecological cancer mortality in women worldwide. If detected at an early stage (I, II), OC has a 90% 5-year survival rate; nevertheless, symptoms are often hidden, leading to late-stage (III, IV) diagnosis and a poor prognosis. The current diagnostic procedures, such as a pelvic exam, transvaginal ultrasound, CA-125 blood tests, serum HE4 tests and multivariate index assays (MIA), are insufficient. Sadly, surgery is frequently required to confirm a positive diagnosis. Therefore, there has been an increased interest in different biomarkers using a non-invasive test as a tool for the earlier diagnosis of OC to resolve the need for precise and non-invasive diagnostic methods. This review article aims to investigate how biomarkers influence early OC detection and to emphasise the role of using a combination of serum biomarkers panel rather than a single biomarker. In addition, this review provides insights into the current serum biomarkers, urine biomarkers and other emerging biomarkers in the early detection of OC for better specificity and sensitivity and to improve the overall survival (OS) rate.

Current and emerging biomarkers in ovarian cancer diagnosis; CA125 and beyond

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Its five-year survival rates are worse than the two most common gynecological cancers, cervical and endometrial. This is because it is asymptomatic in the early stages and usually detected in the advanced metastasized stage. Thus, survival is increasingly dependent on timely diagnosis. The delay in detection is contributed partly by the occurrence of non-specific clinical symptoms in the early stages and the lack of effective biomarkers and detection approaches. This underlines the need for biomarker identification and clinical validation, enabling earlier diagnosis, effective prognosis, and response to therapy. Apart from the traditional diagnostic biomarkers for OC, several new biomarkers have been delineated using advanced high-throughput molecular approaches in recent years. They are currently being clinically evaluated for their true diagnostic potential. In this chapter, we document the commonly utilized traditional screening markers and recently identified emerging biomarkers in OC diagnosis, focusing on secretory and protein biomarkers. We also briefly reviewed the recent advances and prospects in OC diagnosis.

Combining TNFR2-Expressing Tregs and IL-6 as Superior Diagnostic Biomarkers for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Masses

We hypothesised that the inclusion of immunosuppressive and inflammatory biomarkers in HGSOC patients would improve the sensitivity and specificity of the preoperative marker prediction of malignancy in patients with ovarian masses. We tested a panel of 29 soluble immune factors by multiplex bead immunoassay and 16 phenotypic T cell markers by flow cytometry in pre-treatment blood samples from 66 patients undergoing surgery for suspected ovarian cancer or ovarian cancer risk reduction. The potential diagnostic utility of all parameters was explored using Volcano plots, principal component analysis (PCA) and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. We also assessed the effect of culturing PBMCs from 20 healthy donors in the presence of malignant ascites fluid. The combination of TNFR2⁺ Tregs and IL-6 in the pre-treatment blood of patients with advanced HGSOC effectively discriminated patients with benign or malignant ovarian masses. In vitro culturing of the PBMCs of healthy donors in malignant ascites promoted an increase in TNFR2-expressing Tregs, which were decreased following blockade with IL-6 or STAT3 activity. Pre-treatment serum IL-6 and peripheral blood TNFR2⁺ Tregs may be potential clinical biomarkers that can discriminate patients with malignant compared to benign ovarian cancer masses, and the relationship between IL-6 and TNFR2⁺ Treg is likely to be mediated via the STAT3 signalling pathway.

GD2 and GD3 gangliosides as diagnostic biomarkers for all stages and subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the deadliest gynecological cancer, often diagnosed at advanced stages. A fast and accurate diagnostic method for early-stage OC is needed. The tumor marker gangliosides, GD2 and GD3, exhibit properties that make them ideal potential diagnostic biomarkers, but they have never before been quantified in OC. We investigated the diagnostic utility of GD2 and GD3 for diagnosis of all subtypes and stages of OC.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated GD2 and GD3 expression in biobanked tissue and serum samples from patients with invasive epithelial OC, healthy donors, non-malignant gynecological conditions, and other cancers. GD2 and GD3 levels were evaluated in tissue samples by immunohistochemistry (n=299) and in two cohorts of serum samples by quantitative ELISA. A discovery cohort (n=379) showed feasibility of GD2 and GD3 quantitative ELISA for diagnosing OC, and a subsequent model cohort (n=200) was used to train and cross-validate a diagnostic model.

Results

GD2 and GD3 were expressed in tissues of all OC subtypes and FIGO stages but not in surrounding healthy tissue or other controls. In serum, GD2 and GD3 were elevated in patients with OC. A diagnostic model that included serum levels of GD2+GD3+age was superior to the standard of care (CA125, p<0.001) in diagnosing OC and early-stage (I/II) OC.

Conclusion

GD2 and GD3 expression was associated with high rates of selectivity and specificity for OC. A diagnostic model combining GD2 and GD3 quantification in serum had diagnostic power for all subtypes and all stages of OC, including early stage. Further research exploring the utility of GD2 and GD3 for diagnosis of OC is warranted.

Circular RNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer, and more than 70% of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Despite the application of surgery and chemotherapy, the prognosis remains poor due to the high relapse rate. It is urgent to identify novel biomarkers and develop novel therapeutic strategies for EOC. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of noncoding RNAs generated from the "back-splicing" of precursor mRNA. CircRNAs exert their functions via several mechanisms, including acting as miRNA sponges, interacting with proteins, regulating transcription, and encoding functional proteins. Recent studies have identified many circRNAs that are dysregulated in EOC and may be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers. Increasing evidence has revealed that circRNAs play a critical role in ovarian cancer progression by regulating various cellular processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and chemosensitivity. The circRNA-based therapy may be a novel strategy that is worth exploring in the future. Here, we provide an overview of EOC and circRNA biogenesis and functions. We then discuss the dysregulations of circRNAs in EOC and the possibility of using them as diagnostic/prognostic markers. We also summarize the role of circRNAs in regulating ovarian cancer development and speculate their potential as therapeutic targets.

Serum CA125 and HE4 as Biomarkers for the Detection of Endometrial Cancer and Associated High-Risk Features

Early detection of endometrial cancer improves survival. Non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers would improve triage of symptomatic women for investigations. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) and Human Epididymis 4 (HE4) for endometrial cancer and associated high-risk features. Serum samples from women investigated for gynaecological symptoms or diagnosed with endometrial cancer were analysed for CA125 and HE4. Conventional diagnostic metrics were calculated. In total, 755 women were included; 397 had endometrial cancer. Serum CA125 and HE4 were significantly elevated in cases compared with controls (both p < 0.001), and with pathological markers of disease severity (p < 0.05). A combination of CA125 and HE4 detected endometrial cancer with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74−0.81). In a model with body mass index (BMI) and parity, HE4 predicted endometrial cancer in pre-menopausal women with an AUC of 0.91 [sensitivity = 84.5%, specificity = 80.9% (p < 0.001)]. In women with abnormal ultrasound, HE4 ≥ 77 pmol/L improved specificity compared with imaging alone [68.6% (95% CI: 75.0−83.6) vs. 34.4% (95% CI: 27.1−42.3), respectively], but at a cost to sensitivity. HE4 ≥ 77 pmol/L improved the detection of myometrial invasion ≥50% in women with stage I disease compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone [sensitivity = 100% (95% CI: 54.1−100)]. CA125 ≥ 35 U/mL did not add to imaging. HE4 is a good predictor of poor prognostic features which could assist staging investigations.

Clinical usefulness of circulating tumor markers

Tumor markers are a heterogeneous group of substances released by cancer cells into bloodstream, but also expressed by healthy tissues. Thus, very small concentrations can be present in plasma and serum from healthy subjects. Cancer patients tend to show increased levels correlating with tumor bulk, but false positive results could be present in patients with benign conditions. The correct interpretation of TM results could be challenging and many factors should be considered, from pre-analytical conditions to patient concomitant diseases. In this line, the Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine journal has made important contributions though several publications promoting the adequate use of TM and therefore improving patient safety. TM measurement offers valuable information for cancer patient management in different clinical contexts, such as helping diagnosis, estimating prognosis, facilitating early detection of relapse and monitoring therapy response. Our review analyzes the clinical usefulness of tumor markers applied in most frequent epithelial tumors, based on recent evidence and guidelines.

HE4 and CA125 serum biomarker monitoring in women with epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

CA125 is the gold standard serum biomarker for monitoring patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) is a novel serum biomarker for EOC patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this trial was to examine the utility of measuring serum HE4 levels for monitoring EOC patients and to compare HE4 performance parameters to serum CA125.

METHODS

A retrospective trial using residual longitudinal serum samples drawn during treatment and monitoring from EOC patients. Serum CA125 and HE4 levels were analyzed at each time point, and a velocity of change was calculated and correlated with clinical status. The null hypothesis was that HE4 is inferior to CA125, and this was tested using concordance and two-sided Fisher's exact testing. McNemar's test was used to assess the overall agreement of the two assays with the clinical status.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients with 272 separate clinical periods and 1739 events (serum samples) were evaluated. Using a 25% change in serum biomarker levels to indicate change in disease status, the accuracy and NPV determined for HE4 versus CA125 were 81.8% versus 82.6% (p = 0.846) and 87.4% versus 89.7% (p = 0.082), respectively. Concordance comparison of HE4 accuracy / CA125 accuracy was 0.990, indicating HE4 was not inferior to CA125 (McNemar's test p-value = 0.522). Performing a velocity of change analysis, the accuracy and NPV determined for HE4 versus CA125 were 78.3% versus 78.6% (p = 0.995) and 74.9% versus 76.3% (p = 0.815), respectively. Concordance comparison of HE4 velocity accuracy / CA125 velocity accuracy was 0.996, again indicating HE4 was not inferior to CA125 (McNemar's test p-value = 0.884). The combination of HE4 and CA125 velocity changes showed a similar accuracy of 81.3% (p = 0.797 compared to HE4 and CA125 alone) and NPV of 81.1% (p≥0.172 compared to HE4 and CA125 alone), and an increased sensitivity of 70.5% (p≤0.070 compared to HE4 and CA125 alone).

CONCLUSION

HE4 is equivalent to CA125 for monitoring of EOC patients. The combination of CA125 and HE4 velocities is superior to either marker alone.

Malignancy Assessment Using Gene Identification in Captured Cells Algorithm for the Prediction of Malignancy in Women With a Pelvic Mass

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the detection of malignancy in women with a pelvic mass by using multiplexed gene expression analysis of cells captured from peripheral blood.

METHODS

This was an IRB-approved, prospective clinical study. Eligible patients had a pelvic mass and were scheduled for surgery or biopsy. Rare cells were captured from peripheral blood obtained preoperatively by using a microfluidic cell capture device. Isolated mRNA from the captured cells was analyzed for expression of 72 different gene transcripts. Serum levels for several commonly assayed biomarkers were measured. All patients had a tissue diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for the prediction of malignancy using gene expression and serum biomarker levels were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 183 evaluable patients were enrolled (average age 56 years, range 19-91 years). There were 104 benign tumors, 17 low malignant potential tumors, and 62 malignant tumors. Comparison of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for individual genes and various combinations of genes with or without serum biomarkers to differentiate between benign conditions (excluding low malignant potential tumors) and malignant tumors showed that a multivariate model combining the expression levels of eight genes and four serum biomarkers achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) (95.1%, 95% CI 92.0-98.2%). The MAGIC (Malignancy Assessment using Gene Identification in Captured Cells) algorithm significantly outperformed all individual genes (AUC 50.2-65.2%; all P <.001) and a multivariate model combining 14 different genes (AUC 88.0%, 95% CI 82.9-93.0%; P =.005). Further, the MAGIC algorithm achieved an AUC of 89.5% (95% CI 81.3-97.8%) for stage I-II and 98.9% (95% CI 96.7-100%) for stage III-IV patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

Multiplexed gene expression evaluation of cells captured from blood, with or without serum biomarker levels, accurately detects malignancy in women with a pelvic mass.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02781272.

FUNDING SOURCE

This study was funded by ANGLE Europe Limited (Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom).

Value of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm index in predicting the recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer

Aim: This study aimed to assess the predictive and diagnostic value of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) index for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) recurrence. Materials & methods: The clinical features and follow-up data of 159 EOC cases were studied. The ROMA index was calculated by serum CA125 and HE4 levels with menopausal status. Recurrence-free survival was evaluated for an end point. Results: The ROMA was strongly associated with clinical characteristics. The ROMA index above the cutoff value (34.71%) was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival. The ROMA index had a significantly higher sensitivity (90.59%) than CA125 (84.71%) and HE4 (80.80%) for recurrence diagnosis, and its optimal cutoff value was 17.07%. Conclusion: The primary ROMA index is a predictive factor in EOC recurrence and has better performance in the diagnosis of EOC recurrence.

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 for identifying early-stage ovarian cancer

Objective

This work was designed to investigate the performance of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) ADNEX (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa) model combined with human epithelial protein 4 (HE4) for early ovarian cancer (OC) detection.

Methods

A total of 376 women who were hospitalized and operated on in Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were selected. Ultrasonographic images, cancer antigen-125 (CA 125) levels, and HE4 levels were obtained. All cases were analyzed and the histopathological diagnosis serves as the reference standard. Based on the IOTA ADNEX model post-processing software, the risk prediction value was calculated. We analyzed receiver operating characteristic curves to determine whether the IOTA ADNEX model alone or combined with HE4 provided better diagnostic accuracy.

Results

The area under the curve (AUC) of the ADNEX model alone or combined with HE4 in predicting benign and malignant ovarian tumors was 0.914 (95% CI, 0.881–0.941) and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.883–0.942), respectively. With the cutoff risk of 10%, the ADNEX model had a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97) and a specificity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67–0.78), while combined with HE4, it had a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84–0.95) and a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.86). The IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 was better at improving the accuracy of the differential diagnosis between different OCs than the IOTA ADNEX model alone. A significant difference was found in separating borderline masses from Stage II–IV OC (p = 0.0257).

Conclusions

A combination of the IOTA ADNEX model and HE4 can improve the specificity of diagnosis of ovarian benign and malignant tumors and increase the sensitivity and effectiveness of the differential diagnosis of Stage II–IV OC and borderline tumors.

Roles of Antimicrobial Peptides in Gynecological Cancers

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are essential components of the mucosal barrier of the female reproductive tract (FRT) and are involved in many important physiological processes, including shaping the microbiota and maintaining normal reproduction and pregnancy. Gynecological cancers seriously threaten women's health and bring a heavy burden to society so that new strategies are needed to deal with these diseases. Recent studies have suggested that AMPs also have a complex yet intriguing relationship with gynecological cancers. The expression level of AMPs changes during tumor progression and they may act as promising biomarkers in cancer detection and prognosis prediction. Although AMPs have long been considered as host protective, they actually play a "double-edged sword" role in gynecological cancers, either tumorigenic or antitumor, depending on factors such as AMP and cancer types, as well as AMP concentrations. Moreover, AMPs are associated with chemoresistance and regulation of AMPs' expression may alter sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy. However, more work is needed, especially on the identification of molecular mechanisms of AMPs in the FRT, as well as the clinical application of these AMPs in detection, diagnosis and treatment of gynecological malignancies.

The clinical role of glycobiology on ovarian cancer progression

Diverse carbohydrate (glycan) structures are located on lipids and proteins that cover the surface of human cells known as the glycocalyx. Research over many decades have illustrated that the glycan structures located in the glycocalyx change dramatically with cancer contributing to the early development and progression of tumors. New therapeutic and diagnostic applications for cancers based on targeting glycan changes are now in development and in early stage clinical trials. There is an abundance of research for ovarian cancer indicating that certain glycoproteins and glycolipids play major roles in the progression, recurrence, and chemoresistance of this disease. This review is focused on discussion of these biomarkers and how translational medicine for ovarian cancer can be further defined focusing on targeting glycans, glycoproteins, and glycan-mediated interactions.

HE4 as a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of pelvic masses: a prospective, multicenter study in 965 patients

Background

To evaluate the diagnostic value of adding human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to ultrasound for detecting ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Patients aged > 18 years who were scheduled to undergo surgery for a suspicious pelvic mass had CA125 and HE4 levels measured prior to surgery, in addition to a routine transvaginal ultrasound scan. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4 and ROMA for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Of 965 evaluable patients, 804 were diagnosed with benign tumors and 161 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. In late-stage ovarian cancer, CA125, HE4 and ROMA all had an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC > 0.92), whereas in stage I and II, diagnostic performance of all three biomarkers was less adequate (AUC < 0.77). In the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and endometriosis, ROMA and HE4 performed better than CA125 with 99 and 98.1% versus 75.0% sensitivity, respectively, at 75.4% specificity.

Conclusions

ROMA and HE4 could be valuable biomarkers to help with the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in premenopausal patients in order to differentiate from endometriosis, whereas CA125 may be more adequate for postmenopausal patients.

• Serum biomarkers can help to distinguish benign from malignant pelvic masses

• We evaluated the diagnostic value of adding HE4, CA125 and ROMA to ultrasound for detecting ovarian cancer

• In stage III and IV ovarian cancer all three biomarkers showed excellent performance

• ROMA and HE4 performed better than CA125 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and endometriosis

Urine CA125 and HE4 for the Triage of Symptomatic Women with Suspected Endometrial Cancer

A simple, noninvasive and accurate detection tool that can triage women with suspected endometrial cancer for definitive testing will transform patient care. The aim of this study was to evaluate urine CA125 and HE4 levels for the detection of endometrial cancer in symptomatic women. This was a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study of 153 symptomatic women who underwent urgent diagnostic investigations for suspected endometrial cancer at a large gynecological cancer center. Urine samples were collected prior to routine clinical procedures. Urine CA125 and HE4 levels were determined using automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays. Univariate and multivariable receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Urine CA125 and HE4 were discovered to be significantly elevated in women with endometrial cancer, compared to controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Urine CA125 and HE4 detected endometrial cancer with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 (0.81, 0.98) and 0.69 (0.55, 0.83), respectively. CA125 exhibited good discriminatory potential for Type I and early-stage tumors (AUC 0.93 and 0.90, respectively). A diagnostic model that combined urine CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound-measured endometrial thickness predicted endometrial cancer with an AUC of 0.96 (0.91, 1.00). Urine CA125 displays potential as a diagnostic tool for symptomatic women with suspected endometrial cancer. When combined with transvaginal ultrasound-measured endometrial thickness, this patient-friendly, urine-based test could help triage women for invasive diagnostics or safe reassurance, reducing costs and improving patient experience.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2: A potential diagnostic marker for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVES

Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), CA19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) are widely used as tumor markers and algorithms for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer (OC). Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2) has been developed as a potential serodiagnostic marker for OC in Japan. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the six markers alone and in combination to find the best marker for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

METHODS

Frozen serum samples collected from 484 patients were divided into three groups based on histopathological results: OC (n = 119), borderline ovarian tumors (BR) (n = 48), and benign ovarian tumors (BN) (n = 317). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated with an area under a receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.

RESULTS

TFPI2 achieved the highest discrimination between the OC + BR group versus the BN group (AUC 0.8076). ROMA values best discriminated patients with OC from those with BN (AUC, 0.8966), which was equivalent to TFPI2 (AUC, 0.8937). For discriminating the OC group from the BR + BN group, the highest AUC value was achieved by ROMA values (AUC, 0.8884), and TFPI2 also showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (AUC, 0.8845). Combining TFPI2 with ROMA had the highest AUC (0.8420-0.9357).

CONCLUSION

TFPI2 may be a clinically useful single marker comparable to conventional ROMA values for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

Defining Models to Classify between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses Using Routine Laboratory Parameters

Simple Summary

In patients with adnexal masses, classification into benign or malignant tumors is essential for optimal treatment planning, but remains challenging. In the search for new models applicable in a routine clinical setting, we compared classical single parameters to multiparameter predictive models.

Abstract

Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses is essential for optimal treatment planning, but still remains challenging in a routine clinical setting. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare albumin as a single parameter to calculate models by analyzing laboratory parameters of 1552 patients with an adnexal mass (epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): n= 294; borderline tumor of the ovary (BTO): n = 66; benign adnexal mass: n = 1192) undergoing surgery. Models comprising classical laboratory parameters show better accuracies (AUCs 0.92–0.93; 95% CI 0.90–0.95) compared to the use of single markers, and could easily be implemented in clinical practice by containing only readily available markers. This has been incorporated into a nomogram.

The Performance of HE4 Alone and in Combination with CA125 for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer in an Enriched Primary Care Population

Human epididymis 4 (HE4) is a promising ovarian cancer biomarker, but it has not been evaluated in primary care. In this prospective observational study, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of HE4 alone and in combination with CA125 for the detection of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women attending primary care. General practitioner (GP)-requested CA125 samples were tested for HE4 at a large teaching hospital in Manchester, and cancer outcomes were tracked for 12 months. We found a low incidence of ovarian cancer in primary care; thus, the cohort was enriched with pre-surgical samples from 81 ovarian cancer patients. The Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) was calculated using age (</>51) as a surrogate for menopause. Conventional diagnostic accuracy metrics were determined. A total of 1229 patients were included; 82 had ovarian cancer. Overall, ROMA performed best (AUC-0.96 (95%CI: 0.94−0.98, p = <0.001)). In women under 50 years, the combination of CA125 and HE4 (either marker positive) was superior (sensitivity: 100% (95%CI: 81.5−100.0), specificity: 80.1% (95%CI 76.7−83.1)). In women over 50, ROMA performed best (sensitivity: 84.4% (95%CI: 73.1−92.2), specificity: 87.2% (95%CI 84.1−90)). HE4 and ROMA may improve ovarian cancer detection in primary care, particularly for women under 50 years, in whom diagnosis is challenging. Validation in a larger primary care cohort is required.

New Analytical Approach for the Alignment of Different HE4 Automated Immunometric Systems: An Italian Multicentric Study

Human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) elevation has been studied as a crucial biomarker for malignant gynecological cancer, such us ovarian cancer (OC). However, there are conflicting reports regarding the optimal HE4 cut-off. Thus, the goal of this study was to develop an analytical approach to harmonize HE4 values obtained with different laboratory resources. To this regard, six highly qualified Italian laboratories, using different analytical platforms (Abbott Alinity I, Fujirebio Lumipulse G1200 and G600, Roche Cobas 601 and Abbott Architett), have joined this project. In the first step of our study, a common reference calibration curve (designed through progressive HE4 dilutions) was tested by all members attending the workshop. This first evaluation underlined the presence of analytical bias in different devices. Next, following bias correction, we started to analyze biomarkers values collected in a common database (1509 patients). A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In post-menopausal women stratified between those with malignant gynecological diseases vs. non-malignant gynecological diseases and healthy women, dichotomous HE4 showed a significantly better accuracy than dichotomous Ca125 (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.74, p = 0.001 for age ≤ 60; AUC 0.78 vs. 0.72, p = 0.024 for age > 60). Still, in post-menopausal status, similar results were confirmed in patients with malignant gynecological diseases vs. patients with benign gynecological diseases, both under and over 60 years (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.73, p = 0.006; AUC 0.76 vs. 0.71, p = 0.036, respectively). Interestingly, in pre-menopausal status women over 40 years, HE4 showed a higher accuracy than Ca125 (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.66, p = 0.027), thus opening new perspective for the clinical management of fertile patients with malignant neoplasms, such as ovarian cancer. In summary, this model hinted at a new approach for identifying the optimal cut-off to align data detected with different HE4 diagnostic tools.

Urinary Biomarkers for Detection of Clinical Endometriosis or Adenomyosis

Endometriosis or adenomyosis can be clinically diagnosed by ultrasound, symptoms, physical examination, and serum CA125. The urinary markers need to be investigated. The aim of our study was to investigate the urinary markers of clinical endometriosis/adenomyosis, and the correlation of serum CA125 was also studied. From the literature, alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT), enolase-1, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and CA125 in urine and serum were used in our study and measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Further clinical correlation and detection performance were evaluated. We enrolled 19 normal controls and 33 patients clinically diagnosed with endometriosis/adenomyosis. There were significant differences between studied patients and normal controls, as follows: serum CA125 (130.91 vs. 19.75 U/mL, p = 0.004); urinary CA125-creatinine ratio (5.591 vs. 0.254 ng/mg, p = 0.028); and urinary VDBP-creatinine ratio (28.028 vs. 7.301 ng/mg, p = 0.018). For diagnostic performances, serum CA125 provided the best results, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.888 (p = 0.001) and accuracy of 86.5%. Other excellent results were also found using urinary VDBP (AUC 0.841, p = 0.001) and A1AT (AUC 0.722, p = 0.011) creatinine ratio. Using three combined biomarkers, serum CA125, urinary VDBP, and A1AT creatinine ratio, provided good detection power (AUC 0.913, p = 0.001, sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 76.5%). Double urine markers used in combination with VDBP and A1AT creatinine ratio also provided good diagnostic performance (AUC 0.809, p = 0.001, sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 76.5%, accuracy 80%). Further development of non-invasive point-of-care tests using these biomarkers could be a fruitful future endeavor.

The Role of Human Epididymis Protein 4 in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies

Background

The application of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in diverse health diseases, especially in cancers, has been extensively studied in recent decades. To summarize the existing evidence of the aforementioned topic, we conducted an umbrella review to systematically evaluate the reliability and strength of evidence regarding the role of HE4 in the diagnostic and prognostic estimate of diverse diseases.

Methods

Electronic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were conducted from inception to September 16, 2021, for meta-analyses, which focus on the role of HE4 in the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases. This study protocol has been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021284737). We collected the meta-analysis effect size of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value from diagnostic studies and gathered the hazard ratio (HR) of disease-free survival, overall survival, and progression-free survival from prognostic studies. For each systematic review and meta-analysis, we used a measurable tool for evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analysis (AMSTAR) to evaluate the methodological quality. Additionally, we assessed the quality of evidence on estimating the ability of HE4 in the diagnosis and prognosis of diverse diseases by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline.

Results

Overall, 20 meta-analyses including a total of 331 primary studies of different diseases were examined, mainly including ovarian cancer (OC) (n = 9), endometrial cancer (EC) (n = 6), and lung cancer (LC) (n = 4). The methodological qualities of all studies were rated as moderate (45%) or high (55%) by the AMSTAR. According to the GRADE, the certainties of 18 diagnostic pieces of evidence (9 for sensitivity and 9 for specificity) were rated as moderate (34%), low (33%), and very low (33%). Moreover, outcomes from prognosis studies showed evidence (1 for disease-free survival) with high certainty in regard to cancers (such as EC, OC, and LC) with the remaining three being moderate.

Conclusion

This umbrella review suggested that HE4 was a favored biomarker in the prognosis of cancers, which was supported by high certainty of evidence. Additionally, HE4 could provide a suitable method for the diagnosis of EC, OC, and LC with moderate certainty evidence. Further large prospective cohort studies are needed to better elucidate the diagnostic and prognostic role of HE4 in diseases.

Stacking Machine Learning Algorithms for Biomarker-Based Preoperative Diagnosis of a Pelvic Mass

Simple Summary

It is critical for women who are diagnosed with a pelvic mass, or an ovarian cyst to be accurately assessed for their risk of having an ovarian malignancy. Accurate risk stratification for these women will allow for appropriate triage and referral to centers best equipped to treat women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. In this study, machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to determine the optimal combination of biomarkers for prediction of malignancy in women presenting with a pelvic mass. Nine unique ML algorithms were employed to evaluate age, menopausal status, race, and levels of 67 biomarkers from serum, urine, and plasma samples prospectively collected in a cohort 140 women with a variety of pelvic mass diagnoses benign and malignant. A complex statistical algorithm using serum levels of CA125, HE4 and transferrin provided greater than 93% sensitivity and specificity for the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women presenting with a pelvic mass.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the most predictive parameters of ovarian malignancy and develop a machine learning (ML) based algorithm to preoperatively distinguish between a benign and malignant pelvic mass. Methods: Retrospective study of 70 predictive parameters collected from 140 women with a pelvic mass. The women were split into a 3:1 “training” to “testing” dataset. Feature selection was performed using Gini impurity through an embedded random forest model and principal component analysis. Nine unique ML classifiers were assessed across a variety of model-specific hyperparameters using 25 bootstrap resamples of the training data. Model predictions were then combined into an ensemble stack by LASSO regression. The final ensemble stack and individual classifiers were then applied to the testing dataset to assess model performance. Results: Feature selection identified HE4, CA125, and transferrin as three predictive parameters of malignancy. Assessment of the ensemble stack on the testing dataset outperformed all individual ML classifiers in predicting malignancy. The ensemble stack demonstrated an accuracy of 97.1%, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951, and a sensitivity of 93.3% with a specificity of 100%. Conclusions: Combining the measurement of three distinct biomarkers with the stacking of multiple ML classifiers into an ensemble can provide valuable preoperative diagnostic predictions for patients with a pelvic mass.

Prognostic Significance of HE4 Tissue Expression in Serous Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

Background Human Epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is expressed in ovarian cancer. Preoperative serum testing is still not widely available. This pilot study aimed to investigate the magnitude of expression of HE4 in tissue sections of serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma, its correlation with clinical outcome, and the feasibility of HE4 immunohistochemistry as a prognostic marker.

Materials and Method In this ambispective study, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to evaluate tissue sections of ovarian serous epithelial carcinoma at primary cytoreductive surgery. On HE4 immunohistochemistry (IHC), the magnitude of HE4 expression was assessed categorically as high or low HE4 expression and semiquantitatively by the H-score, and correlated with clinical outcome in terms of survival status, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Results Of 32 cases, most (n = 31, 96.8%) were positive for HE4 IHC. The mean age was 49 ± 8.2 years; 29 (90.6%) patients were in FIGO stage IIIC; 25 (78.9%) had ≥1cm residual disease after surgery; 31 (96.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, either 3-weekly (n = 25, 81.2%) or dose-dense weekly (n = 6, 18.8%) regimen. The majority (n = 31, 96.8%) had a high-grade tumor, of whom 19 (59.4%) had high HE4 expression and 13(40.6%) patients had H-score in the range of 5 to 8. The mean H-score was 6.97 ± 3.61 (range 0 to 12). The overall survival of the study population at 64 months was 36.65% (95% CI: 8.59–66.34), with median overall survival of 59 months. A new scoring system was developed combining categorical HE4 expression and serum CA-125 levels; the combination of HE4 expression with postoperative CA-125 levels was found to be the best prognostic marker for overall survival (p = 0.05). A composite score of 2 identified patients with poor progression-free survival (HR 4.64, p = 0.039) and overall survival (HR 5.45, p = 0.05).

Conclusion The new composite scoring system using HE4 IHC with postoperative serum CA-125 levels offers an extremely useful option for prognosticating patients with serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma than serum CA-125 alone. This is useful where preoperative records are not available to the treating clinician.

Evaluation of a symptom-based score in combination with CA125 to predict ovarian malignancy in women with adnexal mass

BACKGROUND

Adnexal masses are a common problem seen in women. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate cut-off for symptom-based score to predict ovarian malignancy in women with adnexal mass and to evaluate it in combination with CA125.

METHODS

This was a prospective study involving 341 women with adnexal mass who underwent surgery. A symptom-based scoring system was administered to the women, preoperatively, and CA125 levels were documented. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the appropriate cut-off for the symptom-based scoring. Results for this symptom-based scoring and CA125 were correlated with surgical pathological findings.

RESULTS

Out of the 341 women with adnexal mass, 112 were diagnosed to have ovarian malignancy. The mean age of women was 43.6±13.8 years. Using ROC analysis, symptom score ≥9 was determined to be the appropriate cut-off. The area under curve (AUC) at this cut-off score was found to be 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.91). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) at this cut-off was found to be 84.8%, 88.6%,78.5%, and 92.3%, respectively. Combining CA125 and symptom score resulted in higher sensitivity (96.4%) and NPV (97.4%) with specificity and PPV of 65.5% and 57.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Symptom score in combination with CA125 has good ability to predict ovarian malignancy in women with adnexal masses.

Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Tumors

(1) OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of CA125, HE4, ROMA index and CPH-I index to preoperatively identify epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or metastatic cancer in the ovary (MCO). (2) METHODS: single center retrospective study, including women with a diagnosis of adnexal mass. We obtained the AUC, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for the diagnosis of EOC and MCO. Subgroup analysis for women harboring adnexal masses with inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features and Stage I EOC was performed. (3) RESULTS: 1071 patients were included, 852 (79.6%) presented benign/borderline tumors and 219 (20.4%) presented EOC/MCO. AUC for HE4 was higher than for CA125 (0.91 vs. 0.87). No differences were seen between AUC of ROMA and CPH-I, but they were both higher than HE4 AUC. None of the tumor markers alone achieved a sensitivity of 90%; HE4 was highly specific (93.5%). ROMA showed a sensitivity and specificity of 91.1% and 84.6% respectively, while CPH-I showed a sensitivity of 91.1% with 79.2% specificity. For patients with inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features and with Stage I EOC, ROMA showed the best diagnostic performance (4) CONCLUSIONS: ROMA and CPH-I perform better than tumor markers alone to identify patients harboring EOC or MCO. They can be helpful to assess the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses, especially in cases where ultrasonographic diagnosis is challenging (stage I EOC, inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features).

[Clinical use and evolution of circulating biomarkers in the era of personalized oncology: From protein markers to bioclinical scores]

In oncology, the identification of targets that correlate with a type of cancer has led to a profound change in the notion of "tumor markers". Technological advances, in particular the development of high-throughput sequencing, have led to the emergence of a new generation of molecular biomarkers for tumors. Despite their limited utility for screening and diagnosis, conventional tumor markers remain interesting for evaluation of prognoses, the choice and optimization of treatments, as well as for monitoring the effectiveness of those treatments. In this article, we revisit the conventional serum markers that are enjoying a 'come back' thanks to the development of high-performance scores based on biological, cytological, clinical, or radiological criteria.