Lymph node metastasis in endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus with occult cervical involvement

ER-positive endocervical adenocarcinoma mimicking endometrioid adenocarcinoma in morphology and immunohistochemical profile: A case report of application of HPV RNAscope detection

RATIONALE

Usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA), high-risk HPV associated, is the most common type of glandular carcinoma in the endocervix. Mucin-depleted usual-type ECA is 1 end of morphological lineage of usual-type ECA and morphologically may show endometrioid features, which could cause diagnostic challenge with uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEC) and primary endometrioid ECA, especially in the setting of small biopsy and endocervical curettage (ECC).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 37-year-old women presented with dyspareunia for 1 year, showing atypical glandular cell on a liquid-based Pap TCT examination and positive for HPV16 detection. ECC showed EEC in another hospital based on its "endometrioid" morphology and immunohistochemical profiles (ER/PR/PAX8 strongly positive, though p16 also strongly positive).

DIAGNOSES

The specimen of hysterectomy in our hospital displayed a lesion confined to the uterine cervix showing the same morphology and immunohistochemical profiles as ECC. Finally, we successfully performed HPV RNAscope and detected high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA particles in tumor cells in situ, which warranted usual-type ECA with mucin-depleted feature, a rare deviation of usual-type of ECA.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent total hysterectomy with lymph node dissection.

OUTCOMES

To date, 14 months after surgery, the patient is well without recurrence or distant metastasis, and undergoes regular reexamination.

LESSONS SUBSECTIONS

We report a rare case of mucin-depleted usual-type ECA showing overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical profiles with EEC. The pathological diagnosis was confirmed by high-risk HPV RNAscope detection which is superior than immunohistochemistry to identify usual-type ECA, warranting an important role in assisting the diagnosis of morphological vague cases.

Cervical invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and ovarian metastasis as predictors of lymph node metastasis and poor outcome on stages I to III endometrial cancers: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine pathological factors that increase the risk of LNM and indicate poor survival of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and treated with surgical staging.

METHOD

Between January 2010 and November 2018, we enrolled 874 eligible patients who received staging surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The roles of prognostic risk factors, such as age, histological subtype, tumor grade, myometrial infiltration, tumor diameter, cervical infiltration, lymphopoiesis space invasion (LVSI), CA125, and ascites, were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of LNM. Kaplan-Meier and COX regression models were utilized to study the overall survival.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis confirmed cervical stromal invasion (OR 3.412, 95% CI 1.631-7.141; P < 0.01), LVSI (OR 2.542, 95% CI 1.061-6.004; P = 0.04) and ovarian metastasis (OR 6.236, 95% CI 1.561-24.904; P = 0.01) as significant predictors of nodal dissemination. Furthermore, pathological pattern (P = 0.03), myometrial invasion (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.139-6.40; P = 0.01), and lymph node metastasis (OR 9.675, 95% CI 3.708-25.245; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical invasion, lymphopoiesis space invasion, and ovarian metastasis significantly convey the risk of LNM. Pathological type, myometrial invasion, and lymph node metastasis are all important predictors of survival and should be scheduled for completion when possible in the surgical staging procedure.

Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Nodal Metastases in Endometrial Carcinoma: Is it Possible?: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors in endometrial cancer and crucial for deciding adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the different models used to predict lymphatic nodal disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A literature search was conducted to detect the relevant studies.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Relevant papers comparing the preoperative modality with the final histopathological results including randomized clinical trials, case-control studies, and any publications with a minimum of 50 patients in the report.

RESULTS

Molecular-based predictors are still far from a practical application. Preoperative radiological scans (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound) have shown the best predictor of lymphatic dissemination. However, there is currently no ideal model available, which can be used within standard clinical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical staging still remains the criterion standard in the determination of lymph node status in endometrial cancer.

Treatment outcomes of patients with stage II pure endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: a Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG-2006) retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Choice of hysterectomy and adjuvant treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is still controversial. Aims of this study were to evaluate survival benefits and adverse effects of different hysterectomies with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

The patients at 14 member hospitals of the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into simple hysterectomy (SH) alone, SH with RT, radical hysterectomy (RH) alone, and RH with RT groups. Endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), adverse effects and prognostic factors for survival.

RESULTS

Total of 246 patients were enrolled. The 5-year RFS, OS, DSS and recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 89.5%, 94.3%, 96.2% and 10.2%, respectively. Patients receiving RH had more adverse effects including blood loss (p<0.001), recurrent urinary tract infections (p=0.013), and leg lymphedema (p=0.038). Age over 50-year (HR=9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.2-70.9) and grade 3 histology (HR=7.28; 95% CI=1.45-36.6) were independent predictors of OS. Grade 3 histology was an independent predictor of RFS (HR=5.13; 95% CI=1.38-19.1) and DSS (HR=5.97; 95% CI=1.06-58.7). Patients receiving adjuvant RT had lower locoregional recurrence (p=0.046), but no impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Different treatment modalities yield similar survival outcomes. Patients receiving SH with RT had lower locoregional recurrent with acceptable morbidity. Age and tumor grading remained significant predictors for survival among patients with FIGO 2009 stage II EEC.

STARD: How many lymph nodals needed to be dissected in corpus carcinoma?

During corpus carcinoma surgery, there is uncertainty as to how many lymph nodes should be dissected and examined to determine lymph invasion.In this study, we evaluated a beta-binominal model in data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, which contains 22,372 complete records. We quantified the relationship between examined node number and the probability of missing invaded nodes. Survival curves were used for further validation.We found that for stage T1-T4, 1, 10, 23, and 37 lymph nodes, respectively, needed to be examined to minimize the missing positive nodal probability (1-nodal staging score, NSS) to less than 5%. A hypothetical lymph node examination rate was calculated. Survival rate of T2 and T3 stage samples was significantly associated with NSS, but T1 and T4 sample survival rate was not.The currently dissected nodal should be reduced to 1 to 2 for T1, remains to 10 for T2, and increases to 23 for T3.

Lymphovascular space invasion and cervical stromal invasion are independent risk factors for nodal metastasis in endometrioid endometrial cancer

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential roles of pathological variables in the prediction of nodal metastasis in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women who underwent surgery for endometrioid EC between 1995 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who underwent prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy and inadequate lymphadenectomy as well as those with nonendometrioid histology, synchronous cancers, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV disease, gross uterine serosal and/or gross adnexal involvement were excluded. Lymph node dissemination was defined as occurring in the following circumstances: (i) when nodal metastasis with pelvic and/or para-aortic (P/PA) lymph node dissection (LND) was performed or (ii) when there was recurrence in the P/PA lymph nodes after a negative LND or when LND was not performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the pathological predictors of lymphatic dissemination.

RESULTS

A total of 827 women with endometrioid EC were assessed; 516 (62.4%) of whom underwent P/PA LND and 205 (24.8%) underwent P LND. Sixty-seven (13%) women in the P/PA LND group and 5 (2.4%) in the P LND group had positive lymph nodes. Multivariate analysis confirmed cervical stromal invasion (OR 4.04, 95% CI 2.02-8.07 (P < 0.001)) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (OR 110.18, 95% CI 38.43-315.87 (P < 0.001)) as independent predictors of lymphatic dissemination.

CONCLUSION

Cervical stromal invasion and LVSI are highly associated with LN metastasis. These markers may serve as a surrogate for nodal metastasis.

Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer

Background:

The histology and grade of endometrial cancer are important predictors of disease outcome and of the likelihood of nodal involvement. In most centres, however, surgical staging decisions are based on a preoperative biopsy. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between the preoperative histology and that of the hysterectomy specimen in endometrial cancer.

Methods:

Patients treated for endometrial cancer during a 10-year period at a tertiary cancer centre were identified from a prospectively collected pathological database. All pathology reports were reviewed to confirm centralised reporting of the original sampling or biopsy specimens; patients whose biopsies were not reviewed by a dedicated gynaecological pathologist at the treating centre were excluded. Surgical pathology data including histology, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, cervical stromal involvement and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as well as preoperative histology and grade were collected. Preoperative and final tumour cell type and grade were compared and the distribution of other high-risk features was analysed.

Results:

A total of 1329 consecutive patients were identified; 653 patients had a centrally reviewed epithelial endometrial cancer on their original biopsy, and are included in this study. Of 255 patients whose biopsies were read as grade 1 (G1) adenocarcinoma, 45 (18%) were upgraded to grade 2 (G2) on final pathology, 6 (2%) were upgraded to grade 3 (G3) and 5 (2%) were read as a non-endometrioid high-grade histology. Overall, of 255 tumours classified as G1 endometrioid cancers on biopsy, 74 (29%) were either found to be low-grade (G1–2) tumours with deep myometrial invasion, or were reclassified as high-grade cancers (G3 or non-endometrioid histologies) on final surgical pathology. Despite these shifts, we calculate that omitting surgical staging in preoperatively diagnosed G1 endometrioid cancers without deep myometrial invasion would result in missing nodal involvement in only 1% of cases.

Conclusions:

Preoperative endometrial sampling is only a modest predictor of surgical pathology features in endometrial cancer and may underestimate the risk of disease spread and recurrence. In spite of frequent shifts in postoperative vs preoperative histological assessment, the predicted rate of missed nodal metastases with a selective staging policy remains low.