Uterine sarcomas 2013

Uterine Adenomyosarcoma Complicated by Uterine Prolapse and Necrosis: A Case Report

In this case, the patient had uterine adenocarcinoma with a huge necrotic mass prolapsed from the vagina, complicated by necrotic infection and massive bleeding. Based on ultrasound results preoperatively, uterine prolapse with infected necrosis was considered due to significant vaginal bleeding, prompting emergency surgery and blood transfusion. Postoperatively, pathology review indicated a misdiagnosis. This article aims to analyze the reasons for misdiagnosis through case review and literature review.

Carcinosarcoma of uterus

Uterine carcinosarcoma, which is categorized as high-grade endometrial cancer, is an uncommon kind of malignant gynecological neoplasms. Clinically, this tumor frequently affects menopausal women and the main symptom is abnormally postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Surgery continues to be the main treatment for carcinosarcoma. In this study, we wanted to discuss 2 cases of uterine carcinosarcoma in 2 women who were in menopause and who had been evaluated by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Uterine carcinosarcomas: From pathology to practice

OBJECTIVE

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare but aggressive cancer. In early-stage disease data guiding treatment is sparse. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings from the 2019 NRG oncology group summer symposium meeting as well as a review of the current literature, with a particular focus on molecular targets, ongoing clinical trials, and treatment of early and advanced/recurrent disease.

METHODS

A combination of expert presentations and an extensive literature search was undertaken to summarize the literature in this review. MEDLINE was queried for peer-reviewed publications on UCS. This search was not limited by year or study design, but was limited to English language publications. ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for ongoing trials in UCS.

RESULTS

UCS is a rare cancer that is biphasic, with the carcinomatous component driving its aggressive nature. Level 3 evidence regarding early stage disease is lacking, but retrospective data suggests adjuvant therapy is warranted. The recent results of GOG 261 have contributed valuable information towards treatment strategy, including use of paclitaxel and carboplatin for UCS. Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate new targeted agents in UCS.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing endometrial cancer clinical trials now include UCS patients. In combination with advances in molecular profiling, this will provide patients with UCS improved therapeutic options. Until that time, surgical resection and traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy remains standard of care.

Effect of adjuvant therapy on the prognosis in stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both following the primary surgery on the progression-free survival and 5-year overall survival in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma.

METHODS

A preliminary investigation was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant studies published up to March, 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by Revman 5.3 software to analysis outcomes.

RESULTS

Six retrospective cohort studies were involved in the analysis, including 1516 patients in observation group, 956 patients in chemotherapy group, 750 patients in radiotherapy group, and 1082 patients in raidochemotherapy group. The results indicated that chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38-0.91, p < 0.05) and radiochemotherapy (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24-0.53, p < 0.001) were associated with improved progression-free survival in patients. Similarly, pooled results suggested chemotherapy (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.71, p < 0.001) and radiochemotherapy (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.29-0.72, p < 0.001) promoted the 5-year overall survival compared with observation. However, radiotherapy alone had no statistical significance in improving progression-free survival (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.49-1.29, p = 0.36) and 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.38-1.12, p = 0.12).

DISCUSSION

Chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy appeared to be prognostic beneficial to early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to analyze the pathological aspects, diagnosis and treatment of rare mesenchymal uterine tumors.

METHODS

On August 2019, a systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes statement (PRISMA). The following words and key phrases have been searched: "endometrial stromal sarcoma", "low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "uterine sarcoma", "mesenchymal uterine tumors" and "uterine stromal sarcoma". Across these platforms and research studies, five main aspects were analyzed: the biological characteristics of the neoplasms, the number of cases, the different therapeutic approaches used, the follow-up and the oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 94 studies initially identified, 55 were chosen selecting articles focusing on endometrial stromal sarcoma. Of these fifty-five studies, 46 were retrospective in design, 7 were reviews and 2 randomized phases III trials.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasms and surgery represents the standard treatment. For uterus-limited disease, the remove en bloc with an intact resection of the tumor (without the use of morcellation) is strongly recommended. For advanced-stage disease, the standard surgical treatment is adequate cytoreduction with metastatectomy. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients with Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS), while is not clear whether cytoreduction of advanced tumors improves patient survival in High-grade ESS. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not routinely used and its role is still debated.

No 371 - Le morcellement durant la chirurgie gynécologique: Son utilisation, ses complications et les risques liés à la présence de tumeurs malignes insoupçonnées

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique conseille les gynécologues quant au recours au morcellement tissulaire pendant une chirurgie gynécologique. RéSULTATS: Le morcellement effectué au cours d'une chirurgie gynécologique peut permettre l'ablation de masses utérines volumineuses, offrant ainsi aux femmes une solution chirurgicale à effraction minimale. Les conséquences oncologiques indésirables du morcellement tissulaire devraient être atténuées par l'amélioration de la sélection des patientes, la tenue d'examens préopératoires et l'adoption de techniques novatrices réduisant au minimum la dispersion tissulaire. ÉVIDENCE: La littérature publiée a été récupérée au moyen de recherches menées dans PubMed et Medline au printemps 2014 à l'aide d'une terminologie contrôlée (« leiomyosarcoma », « uterine neoplasm », « uterine myomectomy », « hysterectomy ») et de mots-clés (« leiomyoma », « endometrial cancer », « uterine sarcoma », « leiomyosarcoma », « morcellation »). Les résultats retenus provenaient de revues systématiques, d'essais cliniques randomisés, d'essais cliniques contrôlés et d'études observationnelles de langue anglaise ou française. Aucune restriction de date n'a été imposée. Les recherches ont été refaites régulièrement, et les résultats ont été incorporés à la directive clinique jusqu'en juillet 2017. Nous avons également tenu compte de la littérature grise (non publiée) trouvée sur les sites Web d'organismes d'évaluation des technologies de la santé et d'autres organismes liés aux technologies de la santé, dans des collections de directives cliniques et dans des registres d'essais cliniques, et obtenue auprès d'associations nationales et internationales de médecins spécialistes.

VALEURS

La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée en fonction des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs. AVANTAGES, INCONVéNIENTS ET COûTS: Les gynécologues offrent aux femmes une chirurgie à effraction minimale pouvant comprendre le recours à un morcellateur électromécanique pour faciliter le retrait des tissus. Les femmes devraient être informées que l'utilisation d'un morcellateur en présence de tumeurs utérines (sarcomes, tumeurs endométriales), cervicales ou tubo-ovariennes jusque-là insoupçonnées est associée à un risque accru de dissémination. Le morcellement tissulaire devrait être précédé d'une évaluation complète, d'une sélection appropriée des patientes et de l'obtention du consentement éclairé de ces dernières, et devrait être effectué par des chirurgiens ayant une formation adéquate en matière de pratiques de morcellement tissulaire sûres. DéCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

No. 371-Morcellation During Gynaecologic Surgery: Its Uses, Complications, and Risks of Unsuspected Malignancy

OBJECTIVE

This guideline provides guidance to gynaecologists regarding the use of tissue morcellation in gynaecologic surgery.

OUTCOMES

Morcellation may be used in gynaecologic surgery to allow removal of large uterine specimens, thus providing women with a minimally invasive surgical option. Adverse oncologic outcomes of tissue morcellation should be mitigated through improved patient selection, preoperative investigations, and novel techniques that minimize tissue dispersion.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and Medline in the spring of 2014 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (leiomyosarcoma, uterine neoplasm, uterine myomectomy, hysterectomy) and key words (leiomyoma, endometrial cancer, uterine sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and morcellation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English or French language materials. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to July 2017. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Gynaecologists offer women minimally invasive surgery, and this may involve tissue morcellation and the use of a power morcellator for specimen retrieval. Women should be counselled that in the case of unexpected uterine (sarcoma, endometrial), cervical, and/or tubo-ovarian cancer, the use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of tumour dissemination. Tissue morcellation should be performed only after complete investigation, appropriate patient selection, and informed consent and by surgeons with appropriate training in the safe practices of tissue morcellation.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Tissue Extraction in Gynecologic Surgery: Past, Present, and Future

Fibroid tissue extraction during hysterectomy and myomectomy has become increasingly controversial. A wave of research has tried to clarify difficult questions around the prevalence of occult malignancies, the effect of morcellation on cancer outcomes, proper informed consent, and surgical options for tissue extraction. This review examines the history of these controversies and discusses tissue extraction techniques and continued areas of debate in the field.

Trends of uterine carcinosarcoma in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare type of high-grade endometrial cancer (EC) that has been understudied with population-based statistics due to its rarity. This study examined temporal trends in the proportion of UCS among women with EC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study examining The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1973-2013. Primary EC cases were eligible for analysis, and a time-specific proportion of UCS was examined during the study period.

RESULTS

UCS was seen in 11,000 (4.7%) women among 235,849 primary EC cases. Mean age at UCS diagnosis increased from 65.9 to 71.7 years between 1973-1989 and then decreased from 71.7 to 67.0 years between 1989-2013 (both, p<0.001). Proportion of Black women significantly increased during the study period (11.9%-20.0%, p<0.001), whereas the proportion of White women decreased from 86.0% to 60.5% between 1987-2013 (p<0.001). There was a significant increase in the proportion of UCS among primary EC from 1.7% to 5.6% between 1973-2013 (p<0.001). Among type II ECs (n=76,118), the proportion of UCS also increased significantly from 6.0% to 17.5% between 1973-2013 (p<0.001). An increasing proportion of UCS was seen in both young and older women but the magnitude of interval increase was larger in the older age group between 1973-2013 (<60 years, from 1.3% to 3.3%. p<0.001; and ≥60 years, from 2.6% to 7.0%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the proportion of UCS has significantly increased among EC, accounting for more than 5% in recent years.

Impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma

BACKGROUND

To examine recurrence patterns in women with stage I uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) stratified by adjuvant therapy pattern.

METHODS

We examined 443 cases of stage I UCS derived from a retrospective cohort of 1192 UCS cases from 26 institutions. Adjuvant therapy patterns after primary hysterectomy-based surgery were correlated to recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

The most common adjuvant therapy was chemotherapy alone (41.5%) followed by chemotherapy/radiotherapy (15.8%) and radiotherapy alone (8.4%). Distant-recurrence was the most common recurrence pattern (5-year cumulative rate, 28.1%) followed by local-recurrence (13.3%). On multivariate analysis, chemotherapy but not radiotherapy remained an independent prognostic factor for decreased risk of local-recurrence (5-year cumulative rates 8.7% versus 19.8%, adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.83, P=0.01) and distant-recurrence (21.2% versus 38.0%, adjusted-HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.27-0.62, P<0.001). The chemotherapy/radiotherapy group had a lower 5-year cumulative local-recurrence rate compared to the chemotherapy alone group but it did not reach statistical significance (5.1% versus 10.1%, adjusted-HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.13-1.58, P=0.22). Radiotherapy significantly decreased local-recurrence when tumors had high-grade carcinoma, sarcoma component dominance, and deep myometrial tumor invasion (all, P<0.05); and combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy was significantly associated with decreased local-recurrence compared to chemotherapy alone in the presence of multiple risk factors (5-year cumulative rates, 2.5% versus 21.8%, HR 0.12, 95%CI 0.02-0.90; P=0.013) but not in none/single factor (P=0.36).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be effective to control both local- and distant-recurrences in stage I UCS; adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be effective to control local-recurrence when the tumor exhibits multiple risk factors.

Uterine sarcoma Part II-Uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: The TAG systematic review

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine tumors (<1%). Four main categories include endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and uterine undifferentiated sarcoma (UUS). This review is a series of articles discussing the uterine sarcomas. LG-ESS, a hormone-dependent tumor harboring chromosomal rearrangement, is an indolent tumor with a favorable prognosis, but characterized by late recurrences even in patients with Stage I disease, suggesting the requirement of a long-term follow-up. Patients with HG-ESS, based on the identification of YWHAE-NUTM2A/B (YWHAE-FAM22A/B) gene fusion, typically present with advanced stage diseases and frequently have recurrences, usually within a few years after initial surgery. UUS is, a high-grade sarcoma, extremely rare, lacking a specific line of differentiation, which is a diagnosis of exclusion (the wastebasket category, which fails to fulfill the morphological and immunohistochemical criteria of translocation-positive ESS). Surgery is the main strategy in the management of uterine sarcoma. Due to rarity, complex biological characteristics, and unknown etiology and risk factors of uterine sarcomas, the role of adjuvant therapy is not clear. Only LG-ESS might respond to progestins or aromatase inhibitors.

MMPs and angiogenesis affect the metastatic potential of a human vulvar leiomyosarcoma cell line

Gynaecological leiomyosarcoma (gLMS) represent a heterogeneous group of soft tissue sarcoma, characterized by rare incidence, high aggressiveness and propensity to infiltrate secondary organs, poor prognosis and lethality, because of the lack of biological mechanisms that underlying their progression and effective pharmaceutical treatments. This study was focused on some of the aspects of progression and dissemination of a subtype of gLMS namely vulvar LMS (vLMS). We therefore used a vulvar LMS-derived cell line namely SK-LMS-1, coupled with in vitro and in vivo assays. We observed that SK-LMS-1 cells have a strong invasive capacity in vitro, through the activity of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, while in vivo these cells induce a strong angiogenic response and disseminate to the chick embryo liver. Therefore, we postulate that metalloproteinases are involved in the spreading behaviour of SK-LMS-1. Further investigations are necessary to better understand the molecular and cellular machinery involved in the progression of this malignancy.

Technical update on tissue morcellation during gynaecologic surgery: its uses, complications, and risks of unsuspected malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of tissue morcellation in minimally invasive gynaecological surgery.

OUTCOMES

Morcellation may be used in gynaecological surgery to allow removal of large uterine specimens, providing women with a minimally invasive surgical option. Adverse oncologic outcomes of tissue morcellation should be mitigated through improved patient selection, preoperative investigations, and novel techniques that minimize tissue dispersion.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and Medline in the spring of 2014 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (leiomyomsarcoma, uterine neoplasm, uterine myomectomy, hysterectomy) and key words (leiomyoma, endometrial cancer, uterine sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, morcellation, and MRI). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits but results were limited to English or French language materials. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to August 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. (Table 1) BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Gynaecologists may offer women minimally invasive surgery and this may involve tissue morcellation and the use of a power morcellator for specimen retrieval. Women should be counselled that in the case of unexpected uterine sarcoma or endometrial cancer, the use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of tumour dissemination. Appropriate training and safe practices should be in place before offering tissue morcellation. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Uterine sarcomas may be difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The risk of an unexpected uterine sarcoma following surgery for presumed benign uterine leiomyoma is approximately 1 in 350, and the rate of leiomyosarcoma is 1 in 500. (II-2) This risk increases with age. (II-2) 2. An unexpected uterine sarcoma treated by primary surgery involving tumour disruption, including morcellation of the tumour, has the potential for intra-abdominal tumour-spread and a worse prognosis. (II-2) 3. Uterus-sparing surgery remains a safe option for patients with symptomatic leiomyomas who desire future fertility. (II-1) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Techniques for morcellation of a uterine specimen vary, and physicians should consider employing techniques that minimize specimen disruption and intra-abdominal spread. (III-C) 2. Each patient presenting with uterine leiomyoma should be assessed for the possible presence of malignancy, based on her risk factors and preoperative imaging, although the value of these is limited. (III-C) 3. Preoperative endometrial biopsy and cervical assessment to avoid morcellation of potentially detectable malignant and premalignant conditions is recommended. (II-2A) 4. Hereditary cancer syndromes that increase the risk of uterine malignancy should be considered a contraindication to uncontained uterine morcellation. (III-C) 5. Uterine morcellation is contraindicated in women with established or suspected cancer. (II-2A) If there is a high index of suspicion of a uterine sarcoma prior to surgery, patients should be advised to proceed with a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and possible oophorectomy. (II-2C) A gynaecologic oncology consultation should be obtained. 6. Tissue morcellation techniques require appropriate training and experience. Safe practice initiatives surrounding morcellation technique and the use of equipment should be implemented at the local level. (II-3B) 7. Morcellation is an acceptable option for retrieval of benign uterine specimens and may facilitate a minimally invasive surgical approach, which is associated with decreased perioperative risks. Each patient should be counselled about the possible risks associated with the use of morcellation, including the risks associated with underlying malignancy. (III-C).