Infrarenal lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies: Two laparoscopic approaches

Ureter Injury in Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer by the Transperitoneal Approach

The patient was 66 years old, had three pregnancies and two deliveries, and was menopausal at the age of 51. She had irregular bleeding and was found to have a chicken-egg-sized uterus and a thickened endometrium (23 mm). She underwent laparoscopic surgery for uterine endometrial cancer (endometrioid carcinoma G1, stage IB). Laparoscopic simple hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, para-aortic lymph node dissection, and partial omentectomy were performed using the transperitoneal approach (TPA). The patient was obese, with a height of 148 cm, a weight of 68 kg, and a body mass index of 31 kg/m2. She had a large amount of visceral fat, which made it difficult to expand the surgical field during para-aortic lymph node dissection. A laparoscopic fan retractor (EndoRetract II, Medtronic) was used to lift the intestinal tracts and expand the field of view. It broke the fat around the left kidney, and the exposed left ureter was heat-damaged using a vessel sealing device (LigaSure, Medtronic). Postoperatively, a left ureteral stent was placed, and continuous urine draining into the retroperitoneum was performed. To prevent injury to the left ureter, the left ovarian vein branching from the left renal vein should be exposed as a landmark before the left ureter running parallel to it is isolated. It is essential that the fat around the left kidney is not broken during this operation. The left iliopsoas muscle should be exposed, and using this as a base, the left ovarian vein, left ureter, and left perirenal fat should be compressed and moved to the left side using a fan retractor to ensure a safe operation.

Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach for aortic sentinel node detection in endometrial cancer

•

Overall, aortic and pelvic detection rate is not influenced by the surgical approach.

•

The number of aortic sentinel nodes above or below the inferior mesenteric artery is not influenced by the surgical approach.

•

The extraperitoneal approach detects a greater number of left lateroaortic aortic sentinel nodes.

BACKGROUND

Although the sentinel lymph node technique in endometrial cancer is currently replacing pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for the evaluation of lymph node status in endometrial cancer, its performance is not yet standardized.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the detection rates and locations of aortic sentinel lymph node detection after dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection in patients with endometrial cancer, using the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Between June 26, 2014 and December 31, 2019, 278 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer at our institution. In all cases, we performed sentinel lymph node biopsy with dual cervical and fundal indocyanine green injection, and back-up lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases. A post hoc analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach to aortic sentinel lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The detection rates were as follows: overall detection rate: 93.2% (259/278); pelvic detection rate: 90.3% (251/278); bilateral pelvic detection rate: 68.0% (189/278); aortic detection rate: 66.9% (186/278); and isolated aortic detection rate: 2.88% (8/278). Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal aortic detection rates were similar (65.0% and 69.6%, respectively), with no significant differences (P=.441). Isolated aortic metastases were similar in both groups (2% vs 4.7%, respectively; P=.185). The laterality of aortic sentinel lymph node detection was influenced by the surgical approach (P=.002), but not its location above or below the inferior mesenteric artery (P=.166 and P=.556, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The detection rates at the aortic level were similar between the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, with no impact on subsequent pelvic detection. The transperitoneal approach detected more laterocaval, precaval, and interaortocaval nodes, whereas the extraperitoneal approach detected more preaortic and left lateroaortic nodes.

The Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Extraperitoneal Approach for Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: A Technique Note and Feasibility Study

Background

Nowadays, lymphadenectomy could be performed by the transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach. Nevertheless, each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Under these circumstances, we developed a transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (TU-LESS) extraperitoneal approach for lymphadenectomy. In this research, the primary goal is to demonstrate the feasibility of the novel approach in systematic lymphadenectomy and present the surgical process step-by-step.

Methods

Between May 2020 and June 2021, patients who had the indications of systematic lymphadenectomy underwent lymphadenectomy via the TU-LESS extraperitoneal approach. This new approach was described in detail, and the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results

Eight patients with gynecological carcinoma were included in the research, including four with high-risk endometrial cancer and four with early-stage ovarian cancer. The TU-LESS extraperitoneal approach for pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was successfully performed in all patients without conversion. In all, a median of 26.5 pelvic lymph nodes (range 18–35) and 18.0 para-aortic lymph nodes (range 7–43) were retrieved. There was a median of 166.5 min of surgical time (range 123–205). Patients had speedy recoveries without complications. All patients had positive pain responses after surgery, as well as satisfactory cosmetic and body image outcomes.

Conclusion

Our initial experience showed that it is feasible to perform systematic lymphadenectomy with the TU-LESS extraperitoneal approach. And this new approach may provide a new measure or a beneficial supplement for lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer.

Surgical Outcomes of Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Compared With Extraperitoneal Approach in Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The optimal surgical approach for para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALND) in gynecologic cancers using minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopy or robotic-assisted) is controversial. This study summarizes the current evidence on the extraperitoneal (EP) approach and compares its perioperative, surgical outcomes, and complications to the transperitoneal (TP) approach in an updated meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compare EP to TP for PALND. The main outcomes included surgical, perioperative outcomes, and complications. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were applied for the comparison of continuous and dichotomous variables with 95% CIs. Three RCTs and 10 non-RCTs trials, including 2,354 patients were identified and enrolled in the meta-analysis. Results: A total of three RCTs and ten non-RCTs trials, including 2,354 patients were identified and enrolled in the meta-analysis. We reported similar results for EP and TP in terms of the hospital stay, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, conversion to laparotomy, total operative time, and postoperative complications (Clavien grade ≥ 1 and Clavien grade ≥ 3). However, the PALND operative time (WMD -10.46 min, 95% CI -19.04, -1.88; p = 0.02) and intraoperative complications (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23, 0.69; p = 0.001) were less with EP. Also, more nodes were removed in EP compared with the TP (WMD 1.45, 95% CI 0.05, 2.86; p = 0.04). Conclusions: The EP approach did not show differences regarding surgical and perioperative parameters compared with the TP approach. However, the number of aortic nodes retrieved was higher. Furthermore, The PALND operative time and intraoperative complications were less in EP.

Extraperitoneal laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma staging: an approach with higher efficiency

Background

Removing more inframesenteric nodes is not only significantly increases the likelihood of finding metastasis for endometrial cancer, but also can add survival advantage. As most patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer are overweight or obesity, a high efficiency approach is important. Aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of extraperitoneal laparoscopic, transperitoneal laparoscopic, and laparotomic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma staging.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients diagnosed with primary endometrial carcinoma who were treated at the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. The numbers of para-aortic lymph nodes, surgical time, complications, blood loss and hospital stay were compared. The patients’ medical records and pathological reports were carefully reviewed. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

We retrospectively compared patients who underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopy (Group E, n = 20), transperitoneal laparoscopy (group T, n = 21), and laparotomy (group L, n = 135). The median number of para-aortic lymph nodes was significantly higher in group E than in groups T and L (9.5, 5, and 6, respectively; p = 0.004 and 0.0004, respectively). All patients in group E underwent successfully dissection to the renal vessel level. The median operation time was significantly shorter in group L than in groups T and E (94, 174, and 233 min, respectively; p < 0.0001). The median estimated blood loss volume was higher in group L than in groups T and E (200, 100, and 142.5 ml, respectively; all comparisons p < 0.001), and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer in group L than in Groups T and E (6, 5, and 6 days, respectively; all comparisons p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach for staging endometrial carcinoma harvested higher numbers of para-aortic lymph nodes which could be considered for endometrial carcinoma staging, especially for para-aortic lymph node harvest.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02416-x.

Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the extraperitoneal approach for paraaortic staging lymphadenectomy results in a lower rate of surgical complications compared to the transperitoneal approach, without compromising oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective randomized multicenter study of patients with early endometrial or ovarian cancer undergoing paraaortic lymphadenectomy in 2010-2019. Patients were randomized to minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopy or robotic-assisted) using an extraperitoneal or a transperitoneal approach. The primary end point measure was a composite outcome that included developing one or more of the following surgical complications: bleeding during paraaortic lymphadenectomy ≥500 mL, any intraoperative complication related to paraaortic lymphadenectomy, severe postoperative complication (Dindo ≥ IIIA), impossibility to complete the procedure, or conversion to laparotomy.

RESULTS

There were 103 patients in the extraperitoneal group and 100 in the transperitoneal group. Differences in the composite outcome (transperitoneal 26.0% vs, extraperitoneal 18.4%; P = 0.195) were not found. Differences in the operative time, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative bleeding, or survival were not observed. A higher number of lymph nodes were retrieved through the extraperitoneal approached (median, interquartile range [IQR] 12 [7-17] vs, 14 [10-19]: P = 0.026). Older age and greater body mass index (BMI) or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) increased the risk for surgical complications independently of the laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The extraperitoneal approach did not show differences regarding surgical and oncological parameters compared with the transperitoneal approach, although the number of aortic nodes retrieved was higher. The decision to use one or another laparoscopic route is a matter of the surgeon preference. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov.identifier: NCT02676726.

Learning curve of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: A cumulative sum analysis

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive surgery including lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer is widely standardized for the management of endometrial cancer in recent decades. However, the learning curve for laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy is poorly reported, specifically that for the extraperitoneal approach.

METHODS

We examined the learning curve for laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis by retrospectively analyzing 134 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who had undergone laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy, including the first case. Data on the surgical factors that improved and were statistically correlated with the number of procedures experienced were extracted and used to create CUSUM curves.

RESULTS

The average time for para-aortic lymphadenectomy was 149.4 min to harvest an average of 65.3 para-aortic lymph nodes. Intra- and postoperative complications were observed in nine cases (6.7%). A switch to the transperitoneal approach was necessary in three cases (2.2%). The number of harvested para-aortic lymph nodes and the procedure time were strongly correlated with the number of procedures the patient underwent (p < 0.01). The CUSUM curve of the number of harvested para-aortic lymph nodes indicated an inflection point at the 51st case. The procedure time for para-aortic lymphadenectomy stabilized after the 59th case. CUSUM analysis of "unexpected events," including intra- and postoperative complications and switch to the transperitoneal approach, showed an improved incidence at 60 cases and later.

CONCLUSION

Gaining proficiency in laparoscopic extraperitoneal thorough para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with a long learning curve of over 60 procedures. Careful management is required when introducing the procedure.

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?

Objective: To explore if obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² represents a limiting factor for para-aortic lymphadenectomy done with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study with 146 consecutive patients, diagnosed with a gynecological cancer submitted to para-aortic surgical staging between January 2010 and December 2018. The mean age was 52 years and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m². 72.6% (106 patients) had BMI <30 kg/m² and 27.4% (40 patients) had BMI ≥30 kg/m². Half of the patients did not have prior abdominal surgeries. Results: The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between two groups depending on their BMI in the lymph node count: BMI <30 kg/m² 14 nodes versus BMI ≥30 kg/m² 10 nodes (P = .122); rate of intraoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.3% versus BMI ≥30: 0% (P = .180), postoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.6% versus BMI ≥30: 5% (P = .723); feasibility rate: BMI <30: 97.1% versus BMI ≥30: 95.6% (P = .063) or the mean hospital stay BMI <30: 2.47 ± 2.05 days (standard deviation [SD]), BMI ≥30: 2.64 ± 0.93 days (SD) (P = .171). The only significant difference observed was due to the operating time: BMI <30: 103.1 ± 60.8 (SD) versus BMI ≥30: 146.9 ± 82.5 (SD) (P = .019), being longer in obese patients. Conclusions: Obesity, estimated by BMI, does not seem to represent a limiting factor for this surgical procedure in our series. We feel it is a feasible and justified approach in obese patients when other surgical procedures have to be carried out in the same surgical act. Probably, other factors and anthropometric measurements are more accurate to select patients in which this approach is feasible.

Periaortic Abdominal Fat Area as a Predictor of Surgical Difficulties during Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether obesity is a marker of surgical difficulty during extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center in the Kanazawa area of Japan.

PATIENTS

Eighty-four patients with primary endometrial cancer who underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LPAND) between January 2005 and December 2017 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

We investigated the correlation between operative times and body mass indexes, visceral fat areas, and periabdominal artery fat areas (PAFAs). The number of lymph nodes harvested was used as an indicator of the degree of surgical completion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was no correlation between the operative time and body mass index. Significant correlations were observed between operative time and visceral fat area (p = .026; r = 0.243) and between operative time and PAFA (p = .007; r = 0.293). A multivariate analysis showed that PAFA was a significant independent marker that could be used to predict prolonged operative times for extraperitoneal LPAND (p = .045; odds ratio, 3.05). The number of para-aortic lymph nodes harvested was not significant in the high- and low-PAFA groups (22 and 25, respectively; p = .525).

CONCLUSION

PAFA is an adequate marker of prolonged operative time for extraperitoneal LPAND among patients with endometrial cancer.

Simultaneous resection of endometrial cancer and high-level paraaortic paraganglioma using retroperitoneoscopic surgery

•Paraganglioma is sometimes suspected as lymph node metastasis or lymph node recurrence of various malignant tumors.•Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is a valid approach to treat the tumor, located above the renal vein.•Resection using retroperitoneoscopic surgery without catecholamine-related complications is possible.