Disparities in the management and outcome of cervical cancer in the United States according to health insurance status

Cancer statistics for African American and Black people, 2025

African American and other Black individuals (referred to as Black people in this article) have a disproportionate cancer burden, including the lowest survival of any racial or ethnic group for most cancers. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society estimates the number of new cancer cases and deaths for Black people in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence (herein through 2021), mortality (through 2022), survival, screening, and risk factors using population-based data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2025, there will be approximately 248,470 new cancer cases and 73,240 cancer deaths among Black people in the United States. Black men have experienced the largest relative decline in cancer mortality from 1991 to 2022 overall (49%) and in almost every 10-year age group, by as much as 65%-67% in the group aged 40-59 years. This progress largely reflects historical reductions in smoking initiation among Black teens, advances in treatment, and earlier detections for some cancers. Nevertheless, during the most recent 5 years, Black men had 16% higher mortality than White men despite just 4% higher incidence, and Black women had 10% higher mortality than White women despite 9% lower incidence. Larger inequalities for mortality than for incidence reflect two-fold higher death rates for prostate, uterine corpus, and stomach cancers and for myeloma, and 40%-50% higher rates for colorectal, breast, cervical, and liver cancers. The causes of ongoing disparities are multifactorial, but largely stem from inequalities in the social determinants of health that trace back to structural racism. Increasing diversity in clinical trials, enhancing provider education, and implementing financial incentives to ensure equitable care across the cancer care continuum would help close these gaps.

Standard of care treatment for stage IVB cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of standard treatment for stage IVB cervical cancer.

METHOD

Databases were searched for Phase III trials evaluating stage IVB CC patients according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Systematic review included Phase III trials evaluating first-line treatment of stage IVB cervical cancer (CC). A meta-analysis was pursued for Phase III trials establishing standard of care treatment that included independent analyses of stage IVB, persistent, and recurrent CC.

RESULTS

For the systematic review, 8 studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 3,161 CC patients analyzed. Of these studies, three met criteria and included suitable data for meta-analysis - GOG 240, KEYNOTE-826, and BEATcc. Of the 1,479 women included in the meta-analysis, 289 (19.5 %) had stage IVB and 1,190 (80.5 %) had persistent or recurrent CC. HR of OS was 0.64 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.75) and 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.64-1.14) for persistent/recurrent and stage IVB CC, respectively. In the test of group differences, p-value was insignificant at 0.098.

CONCLUSION

While trials have assessed outcomes in stage IVB, persistent, and recurrent CC, new treatments demonstrate poorer PFS and OS for stage IVB compared to persistent and recurrent CC. The exact benefit for current standard of care for stage IVB CC could be better defined. Given that stage IVB CC has a different clinical course and treatment history compared to persistent and recurrent disease, stage IVB CC should be analyzed independently in future clinical trials.

Racial disparities in receipt of radiation and brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients: Do they exist in a SEER-Medicare population?

Objectives

To evaluate if race is associated with disparities in receipt of radiation (RT) and outcomes for Medicare patients with cervical cancer who are candidates for primary radiation-chemotherapy.

Methods

This SEER-Medicare retrospective study included White and Black patients with stage IB1 through IVA squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma diagnosed 2000-2017 who were candidates for primary radiation-chemotherapy. Receipt of treatment by race and associated cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed using frequency distributions, chi squared, log rank, multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models, and multivariable logistic models.

Results

1038 patients (84.9 % White and 15.1 % Black) were included. 825 (79.5 %) received RT, and 601 (57.9 %) received brachytherapy (BT). Blacks were more likely to undergo RT than Whites (86.0 % vs. 78.3 %, p = 0.028) and had similar rates of BT (58.0 % vs. 57.9 %, p = 0.986). Median RT duration was 64.0 days (IQR 52.0, 75.0), and 276 (33.5 %) completed treatment in ≤ 56 days, with no differences by race (p = 0.488, 0.303, respectively). BT was more frequently provided at larger hospitals, National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, and teaching hospitals. When adjusted for covariates, no significant differences in RT, BT, or RT duration by race were identified. Median unadjusted OS was 3.58 years (95 % CI 2.92, 4.42) for White patients and 2.50 years (95 % CI 2.0, 5.25) for Black patients, with no differences in OS (HR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.75, 1.13) or CSS (HR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.86, 1.43).

Conclusions

Black Medicare patients with cervical cancer had greater receipt of RT than White patients, similar rates of BT, and no difference in survival.

A systematic review of stage IVA cervical cancer treatment: Challenges in the management of an understudied group

OBJECTIVE

Stage IVA patients comprise a small proportion of participants in cervical cancer trials, yet survival outcomes are disproportionately poor. We aim to perform a systematic review evaluating stage IVA cervical cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review was completed via PRISMA 2020 guidelines using two databases. Inclusion criteria comprised Phase III trials (2004-2024) assessing stage IVA cervical cancer including patients by stage. Searches had MeSH terms: ((cervical cancer) AND (stage IVA) AND (locally advanced)). 761 were articles identified, including books, trials, reviews, and meta-analyses. Of the articles identified, 12 met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 133 (3.8% of study populations) stage IVA and 818 (40% of study populations) stage III-IVA cervical cancer patients were analyzed. Two studies (stage IVA n = 15; 3.1%) established cisplatin as chemoradiotherapy agent of choice, while one study (stage IVA n = 2; 1%) showed no benefit with cisplatin versus radiotherapy alone. Four studies (stage IVA n = 32; 3.6%; stages IIIB-IVA n = 220; 24%) found no benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy, with one analyzing stage IIIB-IVA patients (progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-1.23). Three studies (stage IVA n = 71; 5%) found no benefit adding immunomodulator (stage IVA overall survival HR = 3.48; 95% CI: 0.52-23.29), hypoxic cell sensitizer, or immunotherapy (stage III-IVA PFS HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.49-1.03) to chemoradiotherapy. One study (stages III-IVA n = 598; 56%) found benefit adding immunotherapy to chemoradiotherapy (stage III-IVA PFS HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.42-0.8). One study (stage IVA n = 13; 3.5%) showed benefit with induction chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Trials have not included substantial IVA patients to draw reasonable conclusions. Despite mixed results for immunotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and induction chemotherapy, the exact benefit for stage IVA patients remains unknown. Future clinical trials should include a greater number of stage IVA cervical cancer patients and analyze them individually.

Survival disparities in non-Hispanic Black and White cervical cancer patients vary by histology and are largely explained by modifiable factors

PURPOSE

We investigated racial disparities in survival by histology in cervical cancer and examined the factors contributing to these disparities.

METHODS

Non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White (hereafter known as Black and White) patients with stage I-IV cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 in the National Cancer Database were studied. Survival differences were compared using Cox modeling to estimate hazard ratio (HR) or adjusted HR (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The contribution of demographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors to the Black vs White differences in survival was estimated after applying propensity score weighting in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC).

RESULTS

This study included 10,111 Black and 43,252 White patients with cervical cancer. Black patients had worse survival than White cervical cancer patients (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.35-1.45). Survival disparities between Black and White patients varied significantly by histology (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.15-1.24 for SCC; HR = 2.32, 95% CI = 2.12-2.54 for AC, interaction p < 0.0001). After balancing the selected demographic, socioeconomic and clinical factors, survival in Black vs. White patients was no longer different in those with SCC (AHR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.06) or AC (AHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.96-1.24). In SCC, the largest contributors to survival disparities were neighborhood income and insurance. In AC, age was the most significant contributor followed by neighborhood income, insurance, and stage. Diagnosis of AC (but not SCC) at ≥65 years old was more common in Black vs. White patients (26% vs. 13%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Histology matters in survival disparities and diagnosis at ≥65 years old between Black and White cervical cancer patients. These disparities were largely explained by modifiable factors.

Survival rates in Hispanic/Latinx subpopulations with cervical cancer associated with disparities in guideline-concordant care

BACKGROUND

Failure to deliver guideline-concordant treatment may contribute to disparities among Hispanic/Latinx cervical cancer patients. This study investigated the association between survival rates in Hispanic/Latinx subpopulations and the provision of guideline-concordant care.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with primary cervical cancer from 2004 to 2019 (National Cancer Database). We developed nine quality metrics based on FIGO staging (2009). Clinical and demographic covariates were analyzed using Chi-squared tests. Adjusted associations between receipt of guideline-concordant care and races and ethnicities were analyzed using multivariable marginal Poisson regression models. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to evaluate survival probability.

RESULTS

A total of 95,589 patients were included. Hispanic/Latinx and Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) populations were less likely to receive guideline-concordant care in four and five out of nine quality metrics, respectively. Nonetheless, the Hispanic/Latinx group exhibited better survival outcomes in seven of nine quality metrics. Compared to Mexican patients, Cuban patients were 1.17 times as likely to receive timely initiation of treatment in early-stage disease (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.37, p < 0.001). Puerto Rican and Dominican patients were, respectively, 1.16 (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.27, p < 0.001) and 1.19 (RR 1.19, 95% 1.04-1.37, p > 0.01) times as likely to undergo timely initiation of treatment in early-stage disease. Patients of South or Central American (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.27, p < 0.001) origin were more likely to undergo timely initiation of treatment in locally advanced disease.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in survival were identified among our cohort despite the receipt of guideline concordant care, with notably higher survival among Hispanic/Latinx populations.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (HR-LACC).

METHODS

This retrospective study identified and randomly selected adults diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset. For patients initially treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we estimated real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) among those with persistent disease, real-world time on CCRT, and recurrence-free survival (rwRFS) using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

The cohort included 300 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years. 53.7 % were White and 30.0 % were Black; 52.0 % were premenopausal; 89.3 % had squamous cell histology; 75.3 % had stage III disease, and 92.7 % had no evidence of performance status impairment. Initial treatment included CCRT (N = 229), surgery (N = 28), antineoplastics only (N = 11), and radiation only (N = 5). Twenty-seven patients were untreated. Baseline characteristics for the CCRT-first patients were similar to the overall cohort; their median real-world time on treatment was 1.6 months; 78.2 % received cisplatin for a median of 1.2 months; 28.4 % received antineoplastics after CCRT, and 11.8 % initiated a second antineoplastic therapy. Of the CCRT-first patients, 27/143 with a complete response had subsequent recurrent disease (median rwRFS not reached). 179 patients had persistent disease, among whom median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS was 29.7 (16.9-59.3) months.

CONCLUSION

In this study of United States-based clinical practices, most HR-LACC patients received CCRT as initial treatment. Many patients developed persistent disease after CCRT indicating a need for improved first treatment and maintenance options.

The interaction between social determinants of health and cervical cancer survival: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to investigate what are the most relevant social determinants of health (SDH), how they are measured, how they interact among themselves and what is their impact on the outcomes of cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

Search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from January 2001 to September 2022. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022346854). We followed the PICOS strategy: Population- Patients treated for cervical cancer in the United States; Intervention - Any SDH; Comparison- None; Outcome measures- Cancer treatment outcomes related to the survival of the patients; Types of studies- Observational studies. Two reviewers extracted the data following the PRISMA guidelines. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies was used for risk of bias (ROB) assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included (22 had low and 2 had moderate ROB). Most manuscripts analyzed data from public registries (83.3%) and only one SDH (54.17%). The SDH category of Neighborhood was not included in any study. Although the SDH were measured differently across the studies, not being married, receiving treatment at a low-volume hospital, and having public insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) or not being insured was associated with shorter survival of cervical cancer patients in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a deficit in the number of studies comprehensively assessing the impact of SDH on cervical cancer treatment-related outcomes. Marital status, hospital volume and health insurance status are potential predictors of worse outcome.

Disparities in brachytherapy utilization in cervical cancer in the United States: A comprehensive literature review

Brachytherapy (BT) is an integral component of treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, significantly improving local control and overall survival. There is an overall trend of decreased utilization of BT in United States (US) in the last few decades with around 50% of patients being treated without BT. The cause of decreased utilization is multifactorial including physician comfort, facility volume, low reimbursements rates and costs of starting and maintaining a brachytherapy program. This decrease coincides with an increase in the use of newer advanced techniques like intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) boost resulting in inferior oncological outcomes and increased toxicity. Moreover, racial and socioeconomic disparities in BT utilization have been widely reported in the US. Various factors including age, race, socio-economic status, location, facility type, facility volume and insurance status result in limited access to brachytherapy, which jeopardizes oncologic outcomes. This comprehensive review discusses the BT utilization in the US, examines the impact of race and socioeconomic factors on BT utilization, and highlights its impact on outcomes.

Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers

ABSTRACT

Gynecologic cancer disparities have different trends by cancer type and by sociodemographic/economic factors. We highlight disparities in the United States arising due to poor delivery of cancer care across the continuum from primary prevention, detection, and diagnosis through treatment and identify opportunities to eliminate/reduce disparities to achieve cancer health equity. Our review documents the persistent racial and ethnic disparities in cervical, ovarian, and uterine cancer outcomes, with Black patients experiencing the worst outcomes, and notes literature investigating social determinants of health, particularly access to care. Although timely delivery of screening and diagnostic evaluation is of paramount importance for cervical cancer, efforts for ovarian and uterine cancer need to focus on timely recognition of symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, and delivery of guideline-concordant cancer treatment, including tumor biomarker and somatic/germline genetic testing.

The impact of health insurance affiliation and socioeconomic status on cervical cancer survival in Bucaramanga, Colombia

Cervical cancer is still an important cause of death in countries like Colombia. We aimed to determine whether socioeconomic status of residential address (SES) and type of health insurance affiliation (HIA) might be associated with cervical cancer survival among women in Bucaramanga, Colombia. All patients residing in the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (ICD-0-3 codes C53.X) between 2008 and 2016 (n = 725) were identified through the population-based cancer registry, with 700 women having follow-up data for >5 years (date of study closure: Dec 31, 2021), yielding an overall 5-year survival estimate (95 % CI) of 56.4 % (52.7 - 60.0 %). KM estimates of 5-year overall survival were obtained to assess differences in cervical cancer survival by SES and HIA. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards modeling was also conducted, including interaction effects between SES and HIA. Five-year overall survival was lower when comparing low vs. high SES (41.9 % vs 57.9 %, p < 0.0001) and subsidized vs. contributive HIA (45.1 % vs 63.0 %, p < 0.0001). Multivariable Cox modeling showed increased hazard ratios (HR) of death for low vs. high SES (HR = 1.78; 95 % CI = 1.18-2.70) and subsidized vs. contributive HIA (HR = 1.44; 95 % CI = 1.13-1.83). The greatest disparity in HR was among women of low SES affiliated to subsidized HIA (vs. contributive HIA and high SES) (HR=2.53; 95 % CI = 1.62-3.97). Despite Colombia's universal healthcare system, important disparities in cervical cancer survival by health insurance affiliation and socioeconomic status remain.

Mediation of Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Cervical Cancer by Insurance Status

Importance

Black and Hispanic or Latina women are more likely than White women to receive a diagnosis of and to die of cervical cancer. Health insurance coverage is associated with diagnosis at an earlier stage of cervical cancer.

Objective

To evaluate the extent to which racial and ethnic differences in the diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer are mediated by insurance status.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, cross-sectional population-based study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program on an analytic cohort of 23 942 women aged 21 to 64 years who received a diagnosis of cervical cancer between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from February 24, 2022, to January 18, 2023.

Exposures

Health inusurance status (private or Medicare insurance vs Medicaid or uninsured).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer (regional or distant stage). Mediation analyses were performed to assess the proportion of observed racial and ethnic differences in the stage at diagnosis that were mediated by health insurance status.

Results

A total of 23 942 women (median age at diagnosis, 45 years [IQR, 37-54 years]; 12.9% were Black, 24.5% were Hispanic or Latina, and 52.9% were White) were included in the study. A total of 59.4% of the cohort had private or Medicare insurance. Compared with White women, patients of all other racial and ethnic groups had a lower proportion with a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer (localized) (American Indian or Alaska Native, 48.7%; Asian or Pacific Islander, 49.9%; Black, 41.7%; Hispanic or Latina, 51.6%; and White, 53.3%). A larger proportion of women with private or Medicare insurance compared with women with Medicaid or uninsured received a diagnosis of an early-stage cancer (57.8% [8082 of 13 964] vs 41.1% [3916 of 9528]). In models adjusting for age, year of diagnosis, histologic type, area-level socioeconomic status, and insurance status, Black women had higher odds of receiving a diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer compared with White women (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.08-1.29]). Health insurance was associated with mediation of more than half (ranging from 51.3% [95% CI, 51.0%-51.6%] for Black women to 55.1% [95% CI, 53.9%-56.3%] for Hispanic or Latina women) the racial and ethnic inequities in the diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer across all racial and ethnic minority groups compared with White women.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study of SEER data suggests that insurance status was a substantial mediator of racial and ethnic inequities in advanced-stage cervical cancer diagnoses. Expanding access to care and improving the quality of services rendered for uninsured patients and those covered by Medicaid may mitigate the known inequities in cervical cancer diagnosis and related outcomes.

Disparities in Fertility-Sparing Treatment and Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology After a Diagnosis of Cervical, Ovarian, or Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the presence of sociodemographic and clinical disparities in fertility-sparing treatment and assisted reproductive technology (ART) use among patients with a history of cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients aged 18-45 years who were diagnosed with cervical cancer (stage IA, IB), endometrial cancer (grade 1, stage IA, IB), or ovarian cancer (stage IA, IC) between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, using linked data from the CCR (California Cancer Registry), the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The primary outcome was receipt of fertility-sparing treatment , defined as surgical or medical treatment to preserve the uterus and at least one ovary. The secondary outcome was fertility preservation , defined as ART use after cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% CIs for the association between fertility-sparing treatment and exposures of interest: age at diagnosis, race and ethnicity, health insurance, socioeconomic status, rurality, and parity.

RESULTS

We identified 7,736 patients who were diagnosed with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer with eligible histology. There were 850 (18.8%) fertility-sparing procedures among 4,521 cases of cervical cancer, 108 (7.2%) among 1,504 cases of endometrial cancer, and 741 (43.3%) among 1,711 cases of ovarian cancer. Analyses demonstrated nonuniform patterns of sociodemographic disparities by cancer type for fertility-sparing treatment, and ART. Fertility-sparing treatment was more likely among young patients, overall, and of those in racial and ethnic minority groups among survivors of cervical and ovarian cancer. Use of ART was low (n=52) and was associated with a non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity designation, being of younger age (18-35 years), and having private insurance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that clinical and sociodemographic disparities exist in the receipt of fertility-sparing treatment and ART use among patients with a history of cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer.

Patient perspectives on cervical cancer screening interventions among underscreened women

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is highly preventable with regular screening, yet over 4,000 women die from it annually in the United States. Over half of new cervical cancer cases in the U.S. are attributable to insufficient screening.

METHODS

Participants were 23 low-income, uninsured or Medicaid-insured women in North Carolina who were overdue for cervical cancer screening according to national guidelines. Semi-structured interviews examined perspectives on barriers to cervical cancer screening and on interventions to reduce these barriers. We also elicited feedback on three proposed evidence-based interventions: one-on-one education, coupons to reduce out-of-pocket costs, and self-collection of samples for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the primary cause of cervical cancer.

RESULTS

Reported barriers included high cost, inconvenient clinic hours, lack of provider recommendation, poor transportation, difficulty finding a provider, fear of pain, and low perceived need. Participants suggested interventions including reducing cost, improving convenience through community-based screening or extended clinic hours, strengthening provider recommendations, and providing one-on-one counseling and education outreach. HPV self-collection was most frequently selected as the "most helpful" of 3 proposed interventions (n = 11), followed by reducing out-of-pocket costs (n = 7) and one-on-one education (n = 5).

CONCLUSION

Cost was the most reported barrier to cervical cancer screening, although women experience multiple simultaneous barriers. Novel interventions such as HPV self-collection promise to reduce some, but not all, barriers to primary screening. Interventions that work on reducing multiple barriers, including obstacles to receiving follow-up care, may be most effective to prevent cervical cancer among these high-risk women.

Association of medical uninsurance with sociodemographic attributes in US cancer population: A cross-sectional study of NHANES data 2013 to 2018

Medical uninsurance (MU) is associated with cancer disparities, particularly among underprivileged and minority sections of the United States. In this cross-sectional study of National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2013 to 2018, we evaluated sociodemographic attributes of MU disparity in the US cancer population. Those aged ≥20 years with a history of cancer and disclosed MU status were included. We calculated the descriptive statistics of the population stratified by insurance type and performed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models to assess the association of sociodemographic attributes and MU and reported unadjusted (UOR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR). Among the 1681 participants (US estimated, 25,982,352), 4.3% ± 0.62 were uninsured. Uninsured individuals were 13.5-year younger, largely female, less educated, and non-US born compared to insured individuals. Age (UOR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96), female sex (UOR: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.73-7.19), Hispanics (UOR: 4.30, 95% CI: 2.45-7.54), <high school education (UOR: 7.41, 95% CI: 2.51-21.86), and non-US born with <20-years-stay in US (UOR: 7.69, 95% CI: 3.32-17.82) were associated with MU. In the multivariate model, age (AOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96), female sex (AOR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.25-6.62), <high school education (AOR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.24-13.00), and non-US-born status with <20-years stay (AOR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.44-8.11) were independent predictors of MU. Income was not a predictor of MU. The US cancer population has unique determinants of MU. Ethnicity alone is not a predictor of MU, whereas income is not correlated with MU. Public health interventions focusing on the attributes of MU are needed.

Relative importance of individual insurance status and hospital payer mix on survival for women with cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative contributions of individual insurance status and hospital payer mix (safety net status) to quality of care and survival for patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with cervical cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2017. Patients were classified by insurance (uninsured/Medicaid/private/Medicare/other) and hospitals were grouped into quartiles based on the proportion of uninsured/Medicaid patients (payer mix) (top quartile defined as safety-net hospital (SNHs) and lowest as Q1 hospitals). Quality-of-care was assessed by adherence to evidence-based metrics. Individual contributions of insurance status and payer mix to survival was assessed with a proportional hazards Cox model.

RESULTS

A total of 124,339 patients including 11,338 uninsured (9.1%) and 27,281 Medicaid (21.9%) recipients treated at 1156 hospitals were identified. Quality-of-care was not significantly different across hospital quartiles. Adjusting for patients' clinical/demographic characteristics, treatment at a SNH was associated with a 14% higher mortality (HR = 1.14; 95% CL, 1.08-1.20) than at Q1 hospitals. Testing for individual insurance, uninsured patients had 32% increased mortality (HR = 1.32; 95% CI,1.26-1.38) and Medicaid recipients 40% increased (HR = 1.40; 95%CI,1.35-1.44) compared to privately insured patients. Examining both payer mix and insurance, only individual insurance retained a significant impact on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual insurance may be a more important predictor of survival than site-of-care and hospital payer mix for women with cervical cancer. There is substantial variation in outcomes within hospitals based on individual insurance, regardless of hospital payer mix.

Reoperation rates for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women after undergoing Mid-Urethral sling with or without concomitant colporrhaphy in academic centers within the United States

In this study, the rates of reoperation for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women who underwent a mid-urethral sling (MUS) with or without concurrent colporrhaphy were evaluated. An academic faculty practice consortium database was used to identify a cohort of patients treated surgically for SUI with or without concurrent POP repair (apical, anterior, posterior, or a combination of the three) with or without hysterectomy between 2009 and 2011. A total of 20,484 patients matched the criteria. Of patients who underwent a MUS, 7.2% underwent secondary surgery, with a higher rate of 8.6% associated with those who underwent concurrent prolapse repair (Apical repair HR 1.84, p < .01; Anterior compartment repair HR 1.47, p < .01). Concurrent hysterectomy was associated with a lower hazard of secondary prolapse surgery (HR 0.48; p < .01) if the initial surgery involved a complete POP repair. Prolapse mesh repair resulted in a higher hazard of additional surgery (HR 1.43, p < .01). Medicaid insurance was also associated with an increased hazard ratio compared to commercial insurance for secondary surgery (HR 1.32, p < .01). For women undergoing MUS with complete prolapse repair, concurrent hysterectomy is associated with lower secondary surgery rates. Concurrent prolapse repair with mesh is associated with higher secondary surgery rates.Synopsis: For women undergoing MUS (mid-urethral sling) with complete prolapse repair, concurrent hysterectomy is associated with lower secondary surgery rates. Concurrent prolapse repair with mesh is associated with higher secondary surgery rates.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can present at the same time and negatively impact patients' quality of life. There is little data regarding reoperation rates for patients who undergo both MUS and colporrhaphy in one setting.What do the results of this study add? This study found that patients who undergo concurrent MUS (mid-urethral sling) and complete POP repair with the addition of hysterectomy had a lower risk of secondary surgery.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our data can be used by surgeons to counsel patients on the risks of re-operation for SUI for those who would like to undergo concurrent POP repair with or without hysterectomy.

Cancer statistics for African American/Black People 2022

African American/Black individuals have a disproportionate cancer burden, including the highest mortality and the lowest survival of any racial/ethnic group for most cancers. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society estimates the number of new cancer cases and deaths for Black people in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence (herein through 2018), mortality (through 2019), survival, screening, and risk factors using population-based data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2022, there will be approximately 224,080 new cancer cases and 73,680 cancer deaths among Black people in the United States. During the most recent 5-year period, Black men had a 6% higher incidence rate but 19% higher mortality than White men overall, including an approximately 2-fold higher risk of death from myeloma, stomach cancer, and prostate cancer. The overall cancer mortality disparity is narrowing between Black and White men because of a steeper drop in Black men for lung and prostate cancers. However, the decline in prostate cancer mortality in Black men slowed from 5% annually during 2010 through 2014 to 1.3% during 2015 through 2019, likely reflecting the 5% annual increase in advanced-stage diagnoses since 2012. Black women have an 8% lower incidence rate than White women but a 12% higher mortality; further, mortality rates are 2-fold higher for endometrial cancer and 41% higher for breast cancer despite similar or lower incidence rates. The wide breast cancer disparity reflects both later stage diagnosis (57% localized stage vs 67% in White women) and lower 5-year survival overall (82% vs 92%, respectively) and for every stage of disease (eg, 20% vs 30%, respectively, for distant stage). Breast cancer surpassed lung cancer as the leading cause of cancer death among Black women in 2019. Targeted interventions are needed to reduce stark cancer inequalities in the Black community.

Decision support needs for shared clinical decision-making regarding HPV vaccination among adults 27-45 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Identify HPV information needs and shared clinical decision-making preferences among adults 27-45 and describe differences in needs and preferences among underserved and vulnerable populations.

METHODS

Participants 27-45 years old with no history of HPV vaccination completed a cross-sectional web-based survey between April-May 2020 (N = 702). Preferred role in shared clinical decision making was described across demographic groups and sociodemographic correlates of HPV vaccine information needs.

RESULTS

Most (77.6%) reported a preference to make a medical decision on their own or after consulting with a healthcare provider, while the remaining respondents preferred to make a joint decision (17.0%) or for their doctor to make the decision (5.4%). Over 80% needed more information about safety, effectiveness, personal benefit, provider recommendation, side effects, and risks. Education was the strongest demographic factors associated with higher information needs (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The majority of individuals across demographic groups were individually focused with regard to their healthcare decisions and wanted more information about HPV vaccine safety, side effects, and risks, in addition to personalized information about benefits from HPV vaccination.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Patient-centered interventions are needed to engage adults in shared decision-making regarding HPV vaccination.

Association of Medicaid expansion and insurance status, cancer stage, treatment and mortality among patients with cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently, little is known about the effect of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on care delivery and outcomes in cervical cancer.

AIM

We evaluated whether Medicaid expansion was associated with changes in insurance status, stage at diagnosis, timely treatment, and survival outcomes in cervical cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a difference-in-differences (DID) cross-sectional analysis to compare insurance status, stage at diagnosis, timely treatment, and survival outcomes among cervical cancer patients residing in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states before (2011-2013) and after (2014-2015) Medicaid expansion. January 1, 2014 was used as the timepoint for Medicaid expansion. The primary outcomes of interest were insurance status, stage at diagnosis, treatment within 30 and 90 days of diagnosis, and overall survival. Fifteen thousand two hundred sixty-five patients (median age 50) were included: 42% from Medicaid expansion and 58% from nonexpansion states. Medicaid expansion was significantly associated with increased Medicaid coverage (adjusted DID = 11.0%, 95%CI = 8.2, 13.8, p < .01) and decreased rates of uninsured (adjusted DID = -3.0%, 95%CI = -5.2, -0.8, p < .01) among patients in expansion states compared with non-expansion states. However, Medicaid expansion was not associated with any significant changes in cancer stage at diagnosis or timely treatment. There was no significant change in survival from the pre- to post-expansion period in either expansion or nonexpansion states, and no significant differences between the two (DID-HR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.83, 1.09, p = .48).

CONCLUSION

Although Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in Medicaid coverage and decrease in uninsured among patients with cervical cancer, the effects of increased coverage on diagnosis and treatment outcomes may have yet to unfold. Future studies, including longer follow-up are necessary to understand the effects of Medicaid expansion.

Impact of Race and Insurance Status on Primary Treatment for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of sociodemographic factors on primary treatment choice (surgery vs radiotherapy) in patients with human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database.

SETTING

Data from >1500 Commission on Cancer institutions (academic and community) via the National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Our sample consists of patients diagnosed with HPV+ OPSCC from 2010 to 2015. The primary outcome of interest was initial treatment modality: surgery vs radiation. We performed multivariable logistic models to assess the relationship between treatment choice and sociodemographic factors, including sex, race, treatment facility, and insurance status.

RESULTS

Of the 16,043 patients identified, 5894 (36.7%) underwent primary surgery while 10,149 (63.3%) received primary radiotherapy. Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive primary surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.96). When compared with privately insured patients, those who were uninsured or on Medicaid or Medicare were also less likely to receive primary surgery (OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.56-0.86]; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]; OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96], respectively). Patients receiving treatment at an academic/research cancer program were more likely to undergo primary surgery than those treated at comprehensive community cancer programs (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.14-1.56).

CONCLUSION

In this large sample of patients with HPV+ OPSCC, race and insurance status affect primary treatment choice. Specifically, Black and nonprivately insured patients are less likely to receive primary surgery as compared with White or privately insured patients. Our findings illuminate potential disparities in HPV+ OPSCC treatment.

Elimination of cervical cancer in U.S. Hispanic populations: Puerto Rico as a case study

Cervical cancer remains a major burden for women around the world. In 2018, the World Health Organization called for the elimination of cervical cancer worldwide (<4 cases per 100,000 women-years), within the 21st century. In the U.S., despite great progress toward this goal, existing disparities among racial/ethnic groups in cervical cancer raise concerns about whether elimination can be achieved for all women. We describe: 1) disparities in cervical cancer among Hispanics in the U.S. and factors that contribute to their increased risk, 2) prevention and control efforts to increase equity in the elimination of cervical cancer in this population, and 3) cervical cancer control efforts in Puerto Rico (PR), a U.S. territory, as a case study for cervical cancer elimination among a minority and underserved Hispanic population. Hispanics have the highest incidence rates of cervical cancer among all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. Despite being more likely to complete HPV vaccination series, lower cervical cancer screening and access to treatment may lead to a higher cervical cancer mortality in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic White women. These disparities are influenced by multiple individual-, sociocultural-, and system-level factors. To achieve the goal of cervical cancer elimination in the U.S., systematic elimination plans that consider the needs of Hispanic populations should be included within the Comprehensive Cancer Control Plans of each state. Because PR has implemented coordinated efforts for the prevention and control of cervical cancer, it represents a notable case study for examining strategies that can lead to cervical cancer elimination among Hispanics.

Changes in treatment trends in the early glottic cancer population after the Affordable Care Act

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of Medicaid expansion in otolaryngology is uncertain. Herein, we evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion on treatment patterns (primary radiotherapy vs surgery) in the early glottic cancer population.

METHODS

Data regarding adults with Tis-T2N0M0 glottic cancer that were treated with either surgery or radiotherapy between January 2010 and December 2016 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer database. Changes in treatment trends and survival in the Medicaid expansion setting were discerned.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients undergoing radiotherapy decreased from 64.8% to 59% after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was implemented. State Medicaid expansion status was associated with reduced odds of radiation therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66). Patients were diagnosed more often with earlier stage disease (20.6% vs 17.0% T2 diagnoses) in the Medicaid expansion cohort.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the PPACA was associated with a significant increase in surgical therapy for and earlier diagnosis of glottic cancer.

The Impact of Insurance and Marital Status on Survival in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Objective: This study aimed to explore the influence of social support on the survival outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We examined whether the combined proxy influenced whether patients were more likely to receive radiotherapy. Methodology: data were collected from the 18 registries of the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The association between both insurance status and marital status and disease-specific survival rates were evaluated with a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model to calculate the hazard ratios and associated confidence intervals. Odds ratio (OR) computed by logistic regression was also used to examine the relationship between the receipt of radiotherapy and insurance and marital status. Results: insured and uninsured patients differed significantly in T-stage, N-stage, M-stage, radiotherapy use, race, and marital status. The uninsured-non-married patients showed the lowest 5-year disease-specific survival rates. We further found unmarried patients with either Medicaid (OR, 0.40), or no insurance (OR, 0.24) had lower odds of receiving radiotherapy than those with insurance at diagnosis. Conclusions: uninsured-unmarried NPC patients had a significantly higher risk of distant metastasis at diagnosis, poorer 5-year disease-specific survival, and were less likely to receive radiotherapy than insured-married patients.

Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving Brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of race and insurance status on the use of brachytherapy for treatment of cervical cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database. We identified 25,223 patients diagnosed with stage IB2 through IVA cervical cancer who received radiation therapy during their primary treatment from 2004 to 2015. A univariate analysis was used to assess covariate association with brachytherapy. A multivariable regression model was used to evaluate the effect of race and insurance status on rates of brachytherapy treatment. The Cox proportional hazards model and the multiplicative hazard model were used to evaluate overall survival. P<.05 indicated a statistically significant difference for comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic black patients received brachytherapy at a significantly lower rate than non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-0.99; P=.036); Hispanic (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.85-1.02; P=.115) and Asian (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.99-1.29; P=.074) patients received brachytherapy at similar rates. Compared with patients with private insurance, those who were uninsured (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.65-0.79; P<.001), had Medicaid (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89; P<.001) or Medicare insurance (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.78-0.92; P<.001) were less likely to receive brachytherapy. Brachytherapy was not found to be a mediator of race and insurance-related disparities in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Racial and insurance disparities exist for those who receive brachytherapy, with many patients not receiving the standard of care, but overall survival was not affected.

Area-specific economic status should be regarded as a vital factor affecting the occurrence, development and outcome of cervical cancer

For patients with cervical cancer, despite the incidence and mortality rates have been declining in recent years, due to its huge population base, cervical cancer has always been a serious public health problem. Our research placed emphasis on the indices greatly associated with overall area-specific social economic status, making up for the defects of traditional research which only pay attention to the situation of some specific disease or patients’ individual social status. A total of 39160 women identified cervical cancer were concluded in our study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Program data between 1980 and 2014. With improving the area-specific social economic factors in recent years, the occurrence and prognosis of cervical cancer showed different variation patterns respectively. Some states like California and Georgia for their better economic status and more healthcare investment by local medical institution, population there showed a lower prevalence, incidence, more timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and better prognosis. According to our study, we aimed to give a scientific interpretation on how the area-specific social economic factors affect the disease situation at the macro level and help local medical institution make advisable decisions for controlling cervical cancer.

Effects of insurance status on long-term survival among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Beijing, China: A population-based study

Objective

To evaluate the effects of health insurance status on long-term cancer-specific survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Beijing, China, using a population-based cancer registry data.

Methods

Information on NSCLC patients diagnosed in 2008 was derived from the Beijing Cancer Registry. The medical records of 1,134 cases were sampled and re-surveyed to obtain information on potential risk factors. Poorly-insured status was defined as Uninsured and New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance Scheme (NRCMS), while well-insured included Urban Employees Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) and Free Medical Care (FMC). To estimate survival outcomes, individuals were followed-up until December 31, 2018. Cancer-specific survival probabilities at 5 and 10 years after diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare long-term survival with different characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to examine the relative effect of insurance status on cancer-specific mortality.

Results

Well-insured NSCLC patients have longer cancer-specific survival than poorly-insured individuals [hazard ratio (HR)=0.81; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.67−0.97), even after adjusting for age, gender, cancer stage, smoking status, family history and residential area. Older age and rural residence were associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR=1.03; 95% CI: 1.02−1.03 and HR=1.25; 95% CI: 1.07−1.46, respectively). Smoking individuals had a 41% higher long-term cancer-specific mortality risk than non-smoking ones (HR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.20−1.66).

Conclusions

NSCLC patients with good insurance status had better survival rates than those with poor insurance. An association was significant even after 10 years. Large population-based studies are needed to validate that high reimbursement insurance status can lead to the improvement of long-term cancer prognosis in China.

Predictors of quality of care and survival in a three-state cohort of locally advanced cervical cancer patients and development of a predictive model to identify women at risk of incomplete treatment

To expand our prior statewide analysis of care distribution for locally advanced cervical cancer in Virginia to include 2 more states and to develop a tool for predicting quality of care. Complete treatment was defined as receiving chemotherapy (CT), brachytherapy (BT), and external beam radiotherapy.State cancer registry databases yielded a three-state cohort of 3197 women diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer from 2000 to 2013. A logistic regression evaluated predictors for receipt of BT, CT, and high (2-3 modalities received) versus low (0-1 modalities received) quality care. A Cox proportional hazards models determined predictors of survival. Finally, a predictive model was developed and preliminarily validated using our cohort.Only 35.3% of the cohort received complete treatment and only 57.3% received BT. Significant predictors of lower odds of receiving high quality care varied by state but included: 66+ age at diagnosis as compared to 18 to 42, 42 to 53, or 53 to 66; cancer stage IVA as compared to IIIx, IIx, or IB2; public insurance with supplement as compared to private; treatment at a low volume facility; and closer distance quintiles to a high volume treatment center as compared to the furthest quintile. Significant predictors of worse survival varied by state but included: low quality score (0-1 modalities received); 2000 to 2004 or 2005 to 2009 year of diagnosis as compared to 2010 to 2013; 66+ age at diagnosis as compared to 18 to 42, 42 to 53, or 53 to 66; cancer stage IVA as compared to IIIx, IIx, or IB2; treatment at a low volume facility; and unmarried/unknown marital status as compared to married. Our treatment quality prediction tool included age, age, treatment at high volume facility, and cancer stage and demonstrated 78.2% sensitivity and a 62.9% specificity.Only 35.3% of patients received complete guidelines-concordant treatment. Additionally, in 2/3 states it appeared that BT usage may have decreased during the study period. Our predictive model may help identify patients/regions at risk of receiving low quality care to target interventions aimed at improving cervical cancer treatment quality and survival.

Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019

In the United States, African American/black individuals bear a disproportionate share of the cancer burden, having the highest death rate and the lowest survival rate of any racial or ethnic group for most cancers. To monitor progress in reducing these inequalities, every 3 years the American Cancer Society provides the estimated number of new cancer cases and deaths for blacks in the United States and the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, survival, screening, and risk factors using data from the National Cancer Institute, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, approximately 202,260 new cases of cancer and 73,030 cancer deaths are expected to occur among blacks in the United States. During 2006 through 2015, the overall cancer incidence rate decreased faster in black men than in white men (2.4% vs 1.7% per year), largely due to the more rapid decline in lung cancer. In contrast, the overall cancer incidence rate was stable in black women (compared with a slight increase in white women), reflecting increasing rates for cancers of the breast, uterine corpus, and pancreas juxtaposed with declining trends for cancers of the lung and colorectum. Overall cancer death rates declined faster in blacks than whites among both males (2.6% vs 1.6% per year) and females (1.5% vs 1.3% per year), largely driven by greater declines for cancers of the lung, colorectum, and prostate. Consequently, the excess risk of overall cancer death in blacks compared with whites dropped from 47% in 1990 to 19% in 2016 in men and from 19% in 1990 to 13% in 2016 in women. Moreover, the black-white cancer disparity has been nearly eliminated in men <50 years and women ≥70 years. Twenty-five years of continuous declines in the cancer death rate among black individuals translates to more than 462,000 fewer cancer deaths. Continued progress in reducing disparities will require expanding access to high-quality prevention, early detection, and treatment for all Americans.

Cervical cancer outcome by type of health care facilities: National Cancer Database, 2004-2015

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 was analyzed to identify cervical cancer outcomes associated with demographic and clinical characteristics measured by types of facility. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions and logistic regression to determine factors associated with cervical cancer outcomes. Women treated at Academic/Research Programs (ARPs) were younger at diagnosis, more likely black, less educated and more in Stage 2, lived further away from treatment facilities, had less comorbidities and better 5-year survival, and were more likely to be alive at 30 and 90 days after surgery compared to other programs. Women treated at Community Cancer Programs were more likely 75 and older at diagnosis, more likely to receive radiation treatment and more in Stage 4, more living in rural areas and less than 10 miles from the facility, and had more comorbidities, and lower 5-year survival compared to other programs. Women treated at Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs were more likely white and educated, had more private insurance, and underwent surgery. Women treated at Integrated Network Cancer Programs were more likely to live in urban, south region, and in Stage 1B2, had more surgery and one comorbidity, and died fewer than 30 days after surgery. The type of facility and treatment had varied effects on mortality and 5-year survival. Considering the different cervical cancer outcomes from different health care facilities, further research is needed to identify what factors influence women to choose a health care facility for their treatment and how this choice can affect different health outcomes.

Current Quality of Gynecologic Cancer Care in North America

Evaluating the quality of care received by gynecologic cancer patients in the real world is essential for excellent outcomes. The recent population-based literature looking at quality of care was reviewed for all gynecologic malignancies. Outcomes are generally highest when care is provided by high-volume providers in high-volume cancer centers. Provision of care according to clinical practice guidelines has also been demonstrated to improve outcomes in many situations. Disparities exist for marginalized groups in terms of the care they receive and subsequent outcomes. Health systems need to improve care for these populations.

Changes in insurance coverage for cancer patients receiving brachytherapy before and after enactment of the Affordable Care Act

PURPOSE

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act called for expansion of Medicaid in 2014. As some states elected to expand Medicaid and others did not, the goal of this study was to determine the effect of Medicaid expansion on the insurance status at cancer diagnosis of brachytherapy patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients aged 19-64 years with breast, cervical, uterine, or prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy from 2011 to 2014 with known insurance status were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Fisher's exact test was used to test for associations of insurance status with expanded versus nonexpanded states. For multivariate analysis, a binomial logistic regression was performed, dichotomized to uninsured versus any insurance.

RESULTS

Fifteen thousand four hundred ninety-seven subjects met entry criteria. In the entire cohort, rates of uninsurance were higher in nonexpanded states at baseline (4.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.00001). With selective Medicaid expansion in 2014, expanded states had a reduction in uninsurance rates (2.9-1.8%, p = 0.026), whereas nonexpanded states had a nonsignificant increase in uninsurance (4.5-5.0%, p = 0.371). There was a reduction in uninsurance in expanded states in areas of highest poverty (2.9-1.1%, p = 0.0004) not seen in nonexpanded states. These associations remained significant on multivariate analysis (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.8, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received brachytherapy were less likely to be uninsured in states where Medicaid was expanded, particularly evident in regions with highest poverty levels. These results should help inform policy decisions and efforts to ensure that all patients have access to high quality treatments, such as brachytherapy.

Impact of para-aortic recurrence risk-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer with positive pelvic lymph nodes

OBJECTIVES

A previous study has suggested the benefit of sub-renal vein radiotherapy (SRVRT) for pelvic lymph node (PLN)-positive cervical cancer. In order to better select patients for SRVRT, this study aimed to evaluate the value of a risk-based radiation field based on PLN location and number in PLN-positive cervical cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed 198 patients with FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer, positive PLNs, and negative para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) from 2004 to 2015 at two tertiary centers. All patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) or SRVRT with IMRT. The SRVRT extended the PRT field cranially to the level of the left renal vein. The prescribed doses were 45-50.4Gy in 1.8Gy per fraction.

RESULTS

Overall, 118 and 80 patients underwent PRT and SRVRT, respectively. The SRVRT group had more advanced disease based on FIGO stage, common iliac PLNs, and number of PLNs. The median follow-up was 63months (range: 7-151months). PALN failure was experienced by 28 patients (23.7%) in the PRT group and 1 patient (1.3%) in the SRVRT group (p<0.001). Compared with PRT, SRVRT significantly improved 5-year PALN recurrence-free survival (56.8% vs. 100%, p<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (56.5% vs. 93.9%, p<0.001) among patients with common iliac PLNs or ≥3 PLNs. No significant differences were observed in these outcomes among patients with PLNs below the common iliac bifurcation and 1-2 PLNs. The SRVRT did not increase severe toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-based radiation field based on PLN location and number could optimize outcomes for PLN-positive cervical cancer.

Definitive radiation therapy for cervical cancer: Non-white race and public insurance are risk factors for delayed completion, a pilot study

This is a pilot study to assess whether racial disparities exist in time to initiation and completion of external beam pelvic radiation therapy and brachytherapy in cervical cancers treated with definitive chemoradiation.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy between 2006 and 2016 at a single institution. Patient demographics including age, race, insurance status and stage at diagnosis were obtained. Analyses were performed according to the following definitions of wait times: interval from pathologic diagnosis of cervical cancer to (Siegel et al., 2016) initiation of radiation therapy, (Yoo et al., 2017) completion of external beam radiation therapy and (DeSantis et al., 2016) completion of external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy if indicated.

Of 50 women, 21 self-identified as white, 25 as black and 4 as Hispanic. Due to small numbers, Hispanic women were included with black women as a non-white group. The average age was 52 years for women in this cohort. Mean days to initiation of radiation therapy were 41.8 days: 33.7 days among white patients versus 47.8 days for non-white patients (p-value 0.101). Mean days from diagnosis to completion of external beam pelvic radiation therapy were 81.3 days: 70.9 days among white patients versus 88.9 days among non-white patients (p-value 0.006). Non-white patients were more likely to have public insurance, which was also associated with a longer time to completion of radiation treatment.

We conclude that non-white patients experienced delays to completing external beam radiation therapy, which was no longer present after adjusting for insurance status.

•

Non-white patients experience delayed completion of external beam radiation therapy for cervical cancer.

•

Public insurance is associated with delayed completion of therapy.

•

Receipt of standard of care does not vary by race.

Pattern of Care, Health Care Disparities, and Their Impact on Survival Outcomes in Stage IVB Cervical Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Although locally advanced cervical cancer can be cured, patients with stage IVB disease have poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Our aim was to describe the pattern of care and analyze health disparity variables that may account for differences in treatment modalities and survival in this population.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Codes representing parenchymal and lymphatic metastasis (beyond the para-aortic radiation fields) were used to identify the cohort. Variables included age, race, insurance status, comorbidity, treatment modality, and outcomes. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to compare survival curves and Cox proportional hazards to estimate the association between variables and overall survival (OS). Log-rank method was used to compare Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

There were 4576 patients identified. The majority was white (59.7%); 19.5% were Hispanic, and 9.6% were black. Fifty-one percent had Medicare/Medicaid; 33.7% had private, and 12.5% had no insurance. The majority (56.3%) received chemotherapy (CMT) alone or in combination with radiation therapy (RT) and/or surgery. Median follow-up was 7.3 months (0-124.8 months). Median OS was 11.5 months (10.5-12.5 months). Higher probability of receiving CMT and RT was associated with having private insurance (P < 0.001). Significant prognostic values positively affecting survival on multivariate analysis included black and Asian race, private insurance, comorbidity index of 0, metastatic site at initial presentation (lung), and treatment modality. Patients treated with CMT + RT with or without surgery had significantly better median OS (12 months) compared with those treated with CMT alone (8.3 months), RT alone (4.8 months), or those untreated (2.3 months) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance status influences treatment options in patients with distant metastatic cervical cancer. Race, comorbidity index, metastatic site, and suboptimal treatment appear to affect survival outcomes. Regardless of treatment, survival was extremely limited.

Recent trends in racial and regional disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in United States

BACKGROUND

Although black women experienced greater cervical cancer incidence and mortality rate reduction in recent years, they continue to have higher incidence rates than whites. Great variations also exist among geographic regions of the US, with the South having both the highest incidence and mortality rates compared to other regions. The present study explores the question of whether living in the South is associated with greater racial disparity in cervical cancer incidence and mortality by examining race- and region-specific rates and the trend between 2000 and 2012.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Program data was used. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates, annual percent changes, and disparity ratios were calculated using SEER*Stat software and Joinpoint regression for four groups: US14-Non-Hispanic White (NHW), US14-Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), South-NHW, and South-NHB, where South included 4 registries from Georgia and Louisiana and US14 were 14 US registries except the four South registries.

RESULTS

The average age-adjusted cervical cancer incidence rate was the highest among South-NHBs (11.1) and mortality rate was the highest among US14-NHBs (5.4). In 2012, the degree of racial disparities between South-NHBs and South-NHWs was greater in terms of mortality rates (NHB:NHW = 1.80:1.35) than incidence rates (NHB:NHW = 1.45:1.15). While mortality disparity ratios decreased from 2000-2012 for US14-NHB (APC: -1.9(-2.3,-1.4), mortality disparity ratios for South-NHWs (although lower than NHBs) increased compared to US14-NHW. Incidence rates for NHBs continued to increase with increasing age, whereas rates for NHWs decreased after age 40. Mortality rates for NHBs dramatically increased at age 65 compared to a relatively stable trend for NHWs. The increasing racial disparity with increasing age in terms of cervical cancer incidence rates became more pronounced when corrected for hysterectomy prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Black race and South region were associated with higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality. Cervical cancer rates uncorrected for hysterectomy may underestimate regional and racial disparities. Increasing incidence rates for older NHBs compared to NHWs warrant further research to determine whether screening should continue for NHBs over age 65.

Comparison of Secular Trends in Cervical Cancer Mortality in China and the United States: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis

Background: As one of the most common cancers in the female population, cervical cancer has ranked as the second most incident gynecological cancer in recent years, trailing only breast cancer. We aimed to assess and compare the secular trends in cervical cancer mortality in China and the United States and analyze the independent effects of chronological age, time period and birth cohort using age-period-cohort (APC) analysis. Methods: We performed an age-period-cohort analysis using the intrinsic estimator method to estimate the independent effects of age, time period, and birth cohort on cervical cancer mortality. We collected mortality data for China and the United States from the WHO Mortality Database and China Health Statistical Yearbook database. Results: We examined the general trends in cervical mortality rates in China and the United States during the periods 1988-2012 and 1953-2012, respectively. The age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) for cervical cancer in urban China, rural China and the U.S. showed a general decreasing trend during the observation period, except for urban China, which experienced a significant increase beginning in 2002. The mortality rates for cervical cancer in the three areas showed a general increasing trend with age, regardless of the period effect. Period effects declined steadily in both rural China (from 0.19 to -0.26) and the U.S. (from -0.20 to -0.43); however, a slight increasing trend was identified (from -0.25 to 0.33) in urban China, which indicated that the risk of mortality increased with time. Cohort effects peaked in the cohort born in 1911-1915 in both rural China and urban China, declined consistently in the cohort born before 1950, and then decreased again in the cohort born after 1976-1980. The cohort effect in the U.S. peaked in the birth cohort born in 1876-1880, then leveled off and slightly decreased in younger generations. Conclusions: Our study showed that in general, cervical cancer mortality rates increased with age and decreased with birth cohort in the U.S., while the risk of mortality was highest in the cohort born during 1946-1975 in urban China. Additionally, the risk of mortality consistently increased with age in women younger than 64 years old in urban and rural China and began to decline in older groups. Although the age and cohort effects were relatively strong, the period effect may be the key factor affecting cervical cancer mortality trends, mainly reflecting the immediate effects of effective treatment and the implementation of screening.